6205C15 SHSpec-145  New TR's

     Above TR-4, there is a TR which is auditor query.  This is the 2WC TR for
CCH's and Model Session.  In CCH's, the PC's physical reaction is considered
to be an origination.  The auditor asks, "What happened just then?" Pc:
"What?" Auditor: "That jerk of your head, just then." Pc: "Oh.  I had a
somatic." Auditor: "Thank you." This is the only communication used in the
CCH's!  If the PC originates something verbally, you acknowledge it per TR-4
and go on.  Do not indulge in any extensive 2WC on the PC's answer to your
query.  You ask the 2WC question at the end of a command cycle.  This prevents
him from taking control of the session, though by the end of the command
cycle, he will frequently have forgotten what it was.  This form of 2WC is
intended only to exteriorize the PC from a somatic by getting him to look at
it.  If his answer, when you ask, "What happened?", doesn't pertain to the
physical change you noticed, you can ask, "What happened with your shoulder?",
etc.  Otherwise the PC can grind on and never notice what he is doing.  It is
allowable to encourage him a bit, e.g.  by Asking "How is it going?", as
needed, but this should only be done rarely.

     There are E-meter drills to teach auditors to recognize body motion and
PC "sell".  Pcs will try to make items appear to read, or to make ruds look
clean by gradually loosening their can grip.

     Learn to set up the meter smoothly and quietly so that you don't distract
the PC.  Needle pattern reading is rather new.  "A [needle] pattern is a
series of missed withholds culminating in a constantly active needle." It is a
dirty needle that can be wide or narrow.  You can and should correct such a
pattern.  Get the ruds back in.  If you get a dirty needle on calling a goal,
you need to know that the goal isn't in.  It is kicking because there is a
missed withhold connected with it.  Goals and items can be held in and made to
look like goals and items by suppressions, invalidations, and missed
withholds.  If you are good at it, you can tell whether a PC has a missed
withhold or an invalidation by the needle pattern.  You can and should correct
the needle pattern to keep the PC's ruds in so that you can do Routine 3.
Needle patterns vary from little "buzzt" patterns (not just a tick) [to larger
patterns].  It is rare to find one on a goal or item, but it causes trouble if
it is there, so clean up the missed withhold.  Inval reads with a tick.  The
dirty needle has given Routine 3 more trouble than anything else.

     There is a TR for testing for a clean needle, described in an HCOB of
recent date.  It asks if something is free [i.e.  clean on the needle] and
then repeats the same action.  This applies to all auditing.  You go out by
the same door you came in.  In other words, when leaving an item, you must
check it for cleanness by using exactly the same phrase you originally used
when starting to run the item.  If you ask, "Has this goal been invalidated?",
don't leave it with, "Are there any more invalidations on this goal?" That is
a different question and you don't know if the first one cleared.  So this
applies to all metered questions.  And if you are checking something, tell the
PC that that is what you are doing.

     The best PTP process is the responsibility process ["What part of that
problem could you be responsible for?", possibly?].

     Q and A with the PC ranges from doing what the PC says to worrying about
what the PC was worried about.  Q and A tempters could be done as a drill to
teach the student to just clear his original question.  Holding up against PC
suggestions is also an anti Q and A drill.  "Holding a constant against
adversity is learning to answer with the usual when the unusual is being
demanded of you."