6403C05 SHSpec-8 Case Analysis -- Healing

     Ian Tampion audited PCs on TV for the benefit of the Victoria
legislature, at some hearings in Australia.  This is the ultimate TVD! The
legislators were very interested.

     LRH has started running his goals plot:  the research activities have
left holes in his bank.

     There are [about 350] different goals series, in sets of 42.  Since the
same things went in, over and over, if you run one too deeply, you can drop
through into the next series.  You also get awful somatics if you do this.  The
goals series are consecutive, and it just goes in, over and over again, with
different GPM's.  Same line plot; same goal series.  They just go on and on.
So if you run out one, you are convinced that you couldn't possibly have run
it out, because it is sitting on one of the same GPM's of an earlier series,
so it looks like all the goals are still alive, there.  So if you run one too
deep, you fall through, into an earlier goals series.  So you can leave BPC by
going on to the earlier one, which gives you bad somatics.  You've got 42
goals in a series, for a total of 15,000 GPM's.  They get bigger and bigger as
you go back.  Early track RI's are about the size of a mountain.  If you don't
get the first (PT) series right, the PC will go into a sad effect of great
magnitude with great speed.  It will take only four or five seconds, from
where where you found the wrong GPM to start from, to the toboggan.  This can
happen because you may well not have completed the current series.  Only some
of the 42-goal series closest to PT is formed [because the current series has
not yet been completed].  Therefore it is easy to fall back into the next
series.  Also, the PT GPM itself is truncated, so you can get the first actual
goal, but it is hard to get the first actual GPM.  Everyone has the same
actual line plot in common.  We learned our lesson well before the track
began.

     The consequences of running these GPM's out of order and with wrong line
plots are pretty horrendous, which is why we are not broadly releasing the
line plots.  Incidentally, there are no 2D goals on the actual GPM line plot,
as far as LRH has been able to tell.  There are plenty of implant goals on the
2D, however.

     Case analysis tells you how to become a healing wizard and upset the
AMA.  Man has no real tradition of healing.  There is a lot of charlatanism.
The AMA is into plumbing, not healing, anyway.  Of course, doctors are
necessary -- like plumbers.  They never reveal their stats, or -- not often
enough.  You hear that 600 people have received kidney transplants.  What you
don't hear is that all of them were dead within two years.  Previous attempts
to heal overts have consisted of things like calling for repentance.  This is
not an adequate process.  Man got healing closely associated with structure
and became successful, where structure is concerned.  He knew nothing of
disease.  Infection may or may not have to do with bacteria.  There are too
many variables to say for sure.  The fact that you can see the bugs under a
microscope is insufficient.  LRH has found that infection many be the result
of a GPM.  Healing is done by the body.  The doctor merely arranged the parts
so that they could go back together and hoped that the individual would do the
rest.  Until you have solved the problem of how the individual influences his
own healing process, you can do nothing broadly about healing.  So the healing
professions have tended to be monopolists or frauds.  The modern medicos and
psychiatrists have gone towards a monopoly.  They have also made research a
lucrative profession, but they tend to keep the door shut on a real search into healing by others, not part of their club.  Authority has become "fact"  in courtrooms.  We don't communicate with the medicos, not so much because they are evil as because they have certain stylized ways of thinking into which we do not fit.  They use research as a way of raising money, which is another incomprehensible.  We would have been incomprehensible anyway, because we have gone forward on the basis that there is such a thing as truth, and that using what we know of it, we can help our fellow man.

     Our real goals as scientologists are unreal to the public, so there has
to be a bridge.  We do want some way to bridge in to the fellow on the
street.  Healing can be a part of the lower part of such a bridge, because it
is real to people.  Freedom from psychosomatic illness is something that we
can produce easily at lower levels, even though healing isn't our main
interest.  This makes the monopolists attack us.  The second thing that we
need to know about healing is: if you are going to heal, heal.  Don't heal "in
order to _______ ."  You would gain great acceptance in a community if you
worked on that, avoiding or handling the attacks of the monopolists, and
escaping the wrath of the frauds.

     If you do go in for healing someone, make sure that you also teach him a
little and broaden his horizon beyond his goal of getting rid of his
lumbosis.  You do have a technology for healing any chronic disease or
illness, provided that you can read a meter and keep the auditing comm cycle
going.  A chronic disease is a disease that exceeds its expected duration.
But don't assume that because you can see that someone is sick from something,
you should heal it.  To say what someone is suffering from is very
adventurous.  The person's mental mechanisms can bring about and perpetuate
virtually anything.  Actually, all illness is psychosomatic, even broken
bones.  It shows poor judgement to put one's body in a position where its
bones can be broken, after all.  The genus of psychosomatic illness is in
suggestion [the hypnotic variety].  And suggestion comes down to postulation.
Nothing can be suggested to the individual [with any effect] that he has not
earlier postulated himself.  Thus an overt would be to key in something that
the person had already postulated for himself.  The person must have willed
the destruction of bodies before he could get his body in bad shape.  It
really isn't what has happened to a person that brings about a psychosomatic
illness.  It is what the person is willing to have happen [e.g. to another].
But it is neither possible nor necessary to trace a psychosomatic illness back
to the individual's basic intention to have it, to cure a psychosomatic
illness.  Though all psychosomatic illnesses are self-caused and stem from
early thetan postulates, the key-in of such an illness can be
other-determined.  He doesn't have to have a key-in to make his postulates
come true, but when one of his early postulates sometimes mysteriously
materializes in the physical universe and he doesn't know anything about it,
it is necessary for something else around him to key it in.  He did it himself
and knew he did.  But if it is happening and he doesn't now know that he did
it himself, it must be the result of a key-in.  Hypnotism, for instance, is
merely a key-in of a person's earlier postulates.  [Cf. HCOB 10Aug73 "PTS
Handling"]

     To keep an environment calm, you must be careful of what gets keyed in.
For instance, a war environment is restimulative enough to cause the keying in
of a lot of brutality.  A thetan is unbelievably numerously pre-postulated!!
With 15,000 GPM's, each containing 16 RI's, with locks galore, there is lots
to be keyed in.

     So when you heal psychosomatics, you are not dealing with the thetan's
basic postulations, unless you are auditing at Levels V and VI.  Below Level
V, basic postulates are out of reach of the thetan.  They are neither
necessary nor possible to use, in handling psychosomatic illness.  It is
fortunate that you don't require them.

     Here are the steps in the formation of a psychosomatic illness:

     1.  The thetan postulates it, i.e. he postulates that it could be done or
         that it could happen.  This was trillenia ago, probably.

     2.  Then he did it to someone else.

     3.  Then he could and did have it keyed in on himself, and he got the
         experience.

The key-in could be anything.  It could be something quite mild:  a symbol,
for instance.  Step (1)would be taken up at Level VI if anywhere.  But trying
to handle illness at Level VI is too restimulative.  Someone who is sick is
probably not up to any part of it, and you don't do Level VI partially,
anyway.  Handling Step (2), getting the basic overt on the track, is equally a
matter of going 'way back and is therefore probably impossibly difficult to
get at.

     But you can easily handle Step (3), picking up the key-in in PT, which is
some tiny motivator or a small overt that keys in the big overt, and you can
make the person well by using it.  To cure somebody, find the most recent
key-in that you can get your hands on, or "the latest overt on that subject."
[Again, Cf. HCOB 10Aug63 "PTS Handling"] Don't try to heal with heroic
methods.  Take care of the key-ins, even though you know, correctly, that
there is far, far more behind it.  You want the lightest key-in that you can
approach.  By the nature of the case, you won't be able to reach that big
postulate, until the case as a whole is up to Level VI.  Try to pick up the
key-in that is as close to present time as you can get, not as far back as you
get.  If the recent key-in is too heavy to confront, e.g. if it is something
three lifetimes ago, you can even pick up the key-in of the key-in.  Go easy;
use a feather duster:  The lightest of methods is what succeeds in healing.
Curing bunions is not the same game as restoring to a being his full powers.
But it is a useful skill, and a very "lightly-lightly" one.  You are not
trying to get to basic.  The "heroic" measures indulged in by desperate
doctors are just physical dramatizations of a needless search for basic.
Cutting out the brain to handle things is the effort to arrive at prime
postulate dramatized as a physical action.

     The mystery is how something can be keyed out.  But it can, and it heals
the PC to do so.  He is likely to get the somatic back when he gets up to
Level VI, but there, you will be running it out.