6110C17 SHSpec-67 Problems Intensives Procedure Heroic measures have been used, on the time track, when lighter efforts to get into communication have failed. Brutality follows failed communication; overts are always to be found in the wake of no-communication. The auditor who gets annoyed with the PC has just failed to audit the PC; he has just failed to get the PC to communicate. He has had no methodology, or he hasn't applied it. If this were widespread, scientology would go the way of all former religions -- towards ritual and brutality. The real overt is not bad auditing, it's bad dissemination, i.e. bad teaching, bad comm of how to apply, not insisting that it be done right. It's your inability to get information from PC's which leads to your not trying to get any, which drives you into a vicious frame of mind about PC's, which drives you into not wanting to audit any at all. The auditor who has withholds won't ask for withholds. If on top of that, he can't get information from the PC and doesn't know how to go about it, he'll end up not auditing. That's why any auditor who is not now auditing, isn't auditing: he's lost his confidence in his ability to obtain the information necessary to resolve the case. As long as you have social mores, people will violate them and go out of comm with the group. The auditor-PC relationship is a group, and if they are out of comm with a group, they will tend to be out of comm with all groups. You've got to raise their group consciousness before you get an auditor-PC relationship. So, by using the White Form, you get the withholds off from the sections where they are likely to be concealing anything: present physical condition, 2D stuff, crimes, past mental treatment, etc. All societies set themselves up to be ill, because as soon as you have a bunch of thou-shalt-nots, you will get the two phenomena of withholds and make guilty. So you get people out of comm, no as-ising of those conditions, so civilizations grow ill and die. When mores are your sole method of being civilized, you'll get destruction. Scientology is the first civilization not to operate this way. As long as you can get people to talk, so that they can as-is sin instead of repressing it, you can truly handle the ills of civilizations. Up to now, repression was the only available method. Someone could prove that civilization was made possible only by this mechanism of withholding and making guilty, but only as long as his premise was that Man is basically evil. You have to process somebody and find they are nicer people than you thought previously before you can accept the idea that another basis for civilization is possible. Otherwise you'd think that if you freed Man, he'd become more evil. If you audit someone and see him becoming more vital, active, polite, and freer, you don't get the impression that he's more evil at all. Where an individual has withdrawn out of earlier groups, he becomes harder to process in the group called auditor-PC and harder to get along with in the group called scientology. A failed group member doesn't make a good group member. This applies to this lifetime; former lives have an effect, but the force comes from the this-lifetime groups that he has left. You could do a sec check on each of the groups they had left to get them going into session more easily. Pay particular attention to this with people who are renegades from groups which intended to help: doctors, psychiatrists, etc. Run out his O/W's on that earlier group. You have to be clever to do it, because you have to find out the mores of the earlier group. So do get all you can on his former groups, at least as to what he's been in and left. Only take self-determined changes for the problems intensive processing. They don't give you anything to handle, e.g. graduation. But, e.g., dropping out of school you would be interested in. What you want is his solutions to problems he didn't know he had. Other determined changes aren't his solutions. You'll get reads on them because they are charged, but they are not what you want. [Details on running the process] Stable datum: If you have to remedy havingness a lot, ruds are out. Never run a stop. Avoid stills. Unless you've got movement in the command, the mechanics of the prior confusion will hang you up in the stillness. If you can get the PC to restate it so it's got action in it, great. A "preventing" type action is questionable, but it will run, perhaps slowly, but better than a stop. [More details on procedure]