6106C27 SHSpec-21  CCH's -- Circuits

     The way to bust up machinery on CCH-1 is to vary the pace.  He'll jump
the command if a machine is doing it.

     One effect of the CCH's is to help the PC find the auditor.  If he goes
on automatic, he doesn't have an auditor.  Just running the CCH's will run it
out; varying one's pace will prevent it from starting.

     If you just use intention on the PC and no verbal commands, your
intention may be good, but the PC's command circuits may be goofed up, and you
may not get the response you expected.  He may not be hooked up the way he
should.  You can have fun with a meter talking to the entities in a body.  You
could start talking to the PC's circuit, but it hooks in harder and harder.
It hooks in on a drop of havingness, and you are making a comm line talk
across to his circuit.  You're validating the circuit and lowering [the PC's]
havingness.

     If the PC has a problem and you try to run, "Think of a solution,"
repetitively, the PC caves in.  You are running off the core of an Area of
motion, leaving the motion on automatic.  The PC is not confronting the
actuality of the thing; he's not confronting what's going on at all; he's
confronting a solution to it.  That is, he's trying to not-is what it is, and
the problem mass moves in on him.  If you get him to spot the mass connected
with the problem, then describe the problem, then spot the mass, it moves
further away.  If you get him to think of solutions, the mass will move in.
Problems of comparable magnitude will also move the problem out.  This occurs
because of confront.  If the PC avoids it, it moves in.  You can also move the
mass out with havingness.  A solution is a stable, no-motion datum amidst a
confusion.

     Circuits can be used to get data, to verify answers to calculations,
confirm if they are right or wrong, or to give you tomorrow's weather.  The
latter takes the increment of time that is tomorrow and inspects it.  This is
possible if you can look with equanimity at tomorrow, at least its
insignificant aspects.  You can predict to the degree that you can confront.
People who can't confront PT obsessively try to confront tomorrow or
yesterday, but it's not a real tomorrow, and probably not a real yesterday
either.  The way you go nuts on circuits is to ask yourself, "Who put that
there?" or "Who else put that there and what does it mean?" This gives you a
mystery.  Pc's who don't control their circuits and haven't inspected them for
many years or eons have things popping up all the time when you audit them.
Some get auditing answers from their circuits.  The circuits were put up as a
substitute for confronting and are so old and forgotten that now nothing about
them is confronted.  When the PC nears one of them, it tells him what to do or
say.  Since a circuit is just a no-confront, running havingness and confront
improves circuits.  The PC may have originally put a circuit there for
convenience and then come to believe that it was unconfrontable because there
was a circuit there.

     You could say to the PC, "We're going to handle your primary aberration,
so make a picture of it and look at it.  Tell me what you see." You'd get
amazing answers.  The action of taking a picture of it, then looking is, of
course, an alter-is of confront.  In auditing, you want people to look
directly at things.  Circuits encourage them not to because they think they
can't confront something.  As you audit a PC, these things go live.  As
havingness drops, the PC gets anxious, keys in circuits to predict, or
confront drops.  Or, as the PC improves, and circuits can be activated as the
PC comes up through them.  So everything goes on a via.  Auditing walks him up
to less and less vias; more and more confidence.  The reason confront isn't on
the prehav scale is that it isn't a doingness; it's an ability.  [Cf p. 22,
where confront is described as an action.] [Also Cf. p. 40, where confront is
defined as subjective havingness, or or at least the process is defined as a
subjective havingness process.]

     That explains oddities you get running CCH's.  You're activating and
knocking out circuits because direct control and communication brings about
continuous shift of circuitry in terms of havingness.  Then, since he's been
gotten to PT, confronting the auditor, this brings his havingness up.  If you
talked to those circuits, they might well say anything, which is also true of
the PC on CCH's.  So the less attention you Day to what the PC is saying or
thinking, the better.  Dope off and comm lag indicate things happening to the
PC's confront and havingness.

     Circuits go haywire when they contain the postulate that the thetan is
unable to confront.  Apart from that, they can be useful.