6106C05 SHSpec-8  Routine One, Two and Three

     An auditing result is determined by:

          1. The adequacy of the tool being applied.

     Modified by:

          2. What auditor's will use.

     Which is modified by:

          3. What they can use.

A good process is one that can be widely applied.  A good procedure is to ask
an auditor what he's had gain on himself.  Let him run that until he gets
reality (with training) on something else.  He'll get a result where he
himself believes he can get a result.

     If you increase a person's potential responsibility without letting them
be responsible for what they've done, it is vicious.  The person will feel
miserable, which is better than being irresponsible, but they'll stop getting
case gain because they feel it's not deserved or safe.  As a PC gets
processed, his reality level on his life and overts comes up.  That's why sec
check reads change as the person gets new auditing.  The point of doing O/W is
to bring responsibility up, but this is only possible where there is some
responsibility.  The "dead thetan" case won't read on O/W.  He has total
irresponsibility.  But a person can't take responsibility for his acts unless
you let him do it and communicate them.