From: squirrel@echelon.alias.net (The Tech Lion) Subject: FZ BIBLE - LEVEL 3 COURSEPACK [6/7] Date: 14 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT Message-ID: <3ed8d81610325a6e83010d5392896798@anonymous.poster> Sender: Secret Squirrel Organization: FreeZone Bible Association Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to . The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable. Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST ACADEMY LEVEL III COURSEPACK: Part 6 of 7 *************************************** Continuing our quest to spread the Tech on the internet, we bring you the Academy Level 3 coursepack from the late 1980s, in 7 parts. The full table of contents is in Part 1 only. To see the proper formatting, use a fixed-pitch font such as Courier to view this file. Looking forward to a Tech-filled Millenium, -The Tech Lion ******************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************ PART 6 23. HCOB 19 Mar. 1971 List 1C--L1C 24. HCOB 23 July 1980R Confessional Repair List--LCRE 25. HCOB 22 Aug. 1966 Floating Needles, Listing Processes 26. HCOB 1 Aug. 1968 The Laws of Listing and Nulling 27. HCOB 19 Sept 1968 "Old lists..." 28. HCOB 7 Oct. 1968 Assessment 29. HCOB 20 Sept 1978 An Instant F/N is a Read 30. HCOB 22 Apr. 1980R Assessment Drills [encore] 31. HCOB 20 Apr. 1972 II Product Purpose and Why and W/C Error Correction C/S Series 78 32. HCOB 11 Apr. 1977 List Errors, Correction of 33. HCOB 15 Dec. 68RA L4BRA, for Assessment of All Listing Errors 34. HCOB 6 Aug. 1968 R3H ****************************************************************** 23. HCOB 19 Mar. 1971 List 1C--L1C HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 19 MARCH 1971 Remimeo LIST 1C--L1C (Cancels earlier L1 Lists such as HCOB 8 Aug. 70) Used by auditors in session when an upset occurs, or as ordered by C/S. Handles ARC broken, sad, hopeless or nattery pcs. Questions can be prefaced with "Recently" "In this life" "On the whole track" or used without. DO NOT USE ON HIGH TA TO BRING IT DOWN. USE HI-LO TA LIST. TAKE ALL READING ITEMS OR VOLUNTEERED ANSWERS earlier-similar to F/N as they occur. 1. Has there been an error in listing? (If this reads change to L4B at once.) 2. Has a withhold been missed? 3. Has some emotion been rejected? 4. Has some affinity been rejected? 5. Has a reality been refused? 6. Has a communication been cut short? 7. Has a communication been ignored? 8. Has an earlier rejection of emotion been restimulated? 9. Has an earlier rejection of affinity been restimulated? 10. Has an earlier refusal of reality been restimulated? 11. Has an earlier ignored communication been restimulated? 12. Has something been misunderstood? 13. Has someone been misunderstood? 14. Has an earlier misunderstanding been restimulated? 15. Has some data been confusing? 16. Has there been a command you haven't understood? 17. Has there been some word you haven't known the meaning of? 18. Has there been some situation you haven't grasped? 19. Has there been a problem? 20. Has a wrong reason for an upset been given? 21. Has a similar incident occurred before? 22. Has something been done other than what was said? 23. Has a goal been disappointed? 24. Has some help been rejected? 25. Has a decision been made? 26. Has an engram been restimulated? 27. Has an earlier incident been restimulated? 28. Has there been a sudden shift of attention? 29. Has something startled you? 30. Has a perception been prevented? 31. Has a willingness not been acknowledged? 32. Has there been no auditing? 33. Did you go exterior? 34. Have actions been interrupted? 35. Have actions continued too long? 36. Has data been invalidated? 37. Has someone evaluated? 38. Has something been overrun? 39. Has an action been unnecessary? L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:mes.rd.gm  ****************************************************************** 24. HCOB 23 July 1980R Confessional Repair List--LCRE HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JULY 1980R REVISED 26 JULY 1986 Remimeo C/Ses Auditors, Class II and above CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST--LCRE This HCOB cancels and replaces all of the following: HCOB 30 July 70 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST L-CR HCOB 8 Dec. 72 INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST L1R HCOB 8 Dec. 72R INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST Rev. 12.2.73 L1R BTB 8 Dec. 72R INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST L1R BTB 8 Dec. 72RA INTEGRITY PROCESSING AND O/Ws REPAIR LIST-L1RA BTB 8 Dec. 72RB CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRB BTB 8 Dec. 72RC CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRC HCOB 20 July 80 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRD This is the prepared list to use for repairing a Confessional, whether done as auditing or as an HCO Confessional. It is also for use in handling BPC from other O/W actions such as O/W write-ups. If, after a Confessional or O/W write-up, the person red tags at the Examiner or if he gets sick or upset or falls on his head, this list is assessed and handled to straighten the matter out. The repair action would be a 24-hour repair priority. If there is a bog during a Confessional action, the auditor would first check for missed withholds, false reads and ARC breaks, in that order, and handle what he found. (Ref: HCOB 30 Nov. 78R, CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE) If this does not resolve the difficulty, one should use the LCRE. The list is usually assessed Method 3, but may be assessed Method 5 in the case of a severe pc upset or as directed by the C/S. The list should be used with a prefix which acts as a time limiter, such as "In this session, ______?" or "On your O/W write-up, ______?" PRECLEAR:___________________________________ DATE:________________ AUDITOR:____________________________________ 1. OUT-INT? ________ (If you get a valid read, not a false or protest read, indicate it. If the pc has had an Int RD or End of Endless Int RD previously, assess and handle the Int RD Correction List. If the pc has not had previous Int handling or if the Int RD Correction List does not fully resolve the situation, do an Int RD or, on a Clear or OT, the End of Endless Int RD. If you are not qualified to deliver the Int RD or the End of Endless Int RD, end off for a qualified auditor to handle.) 2. LIST ERROR? ________ (Indicate. If Class III or above, find out what list and repair with L4BRA. If not Class III, end off for handling by a Class III or above.) 3. WRONG ITEM? ________ (Handle as in #2.) 4. WAS THERE AN ARC BREAK? ________ (ARCU, CDEINR E/S to F/N.) 5. WAS THERE A PROBLEM? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 6. WAS A WITHHOLD MISSED? ________ (Pull it getting who nearly found out, etc. E/S to F/N.) 7. DID YOU TELL PART OF A WITHHOLD BUT NOT THE REST? ________ (Get all of the withhold, flatten it E/S to F/N.) 8. DID YOU MISDIRECT THE AUDITOR? ________ (Handle as an overt, E/S to F/N. Flatten any unflat Confessional chain uncovered.) 9. DID YOU AVOID TELLING ONE OVERT BY GIVING A DIFFERENT ONE? ________ (Pull the overt the pc avoided telling, E/S to F/N.) 10. WERE YOU WAITING FOR A MORE SPECIFICALLY WORDED QUESTION? ________ (Find out what Sec Check question the pc was waiting for and get it answered, to F/N.) 11. DID THE AUDITOR FAIL TO FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT YOU? ________ (Handle as a missed withhold, E/S to F/N.) 12. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER A SEC CHECK QUESTION? ________ (Find out which question and handle to F/N.) 13. DID YOU DELIBERATELY NOT ANSWER A SEC CHECK QUESTION? ________ (Find out what question and handle to F/N.) 14. DID YOU WITHHOLD SAYING SOMETHING FOR FEAR OF GETTING INTO ETHICS TROUBLE? ________ (Handle to F/N as per Sec Checking procedure.) 15. DID YOU TRY TO LESSEN AN OVERT? ________ (Find out how he tried to lessen the overt and complete its handling to F/N.) 16. HAS AN OVERT BEEN JUSTIFIED? ________ (Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete to F/N.) 17. WAS THERE SOME OTHER WAY YOU JUSTIFIED THE OVERT? ________ (Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete its handling to F/N.) 18. WORRIED ABOUT REPUTATION? ________ (Clean it up with 2WC E/S to F/N.) 19. ARE THERE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 20. WAS THERE AN EARLIER OVERT UNDISCLOSED? ________ (Pull it E/S to F/N.) 21. WAS A CHAIN OF OVERTS NOT TAKEN BACK TO BASIC? ________ (Take it back to basic.) 22. WAS AN OVERT TOO LATE ON THE CHAIN? ________ (Get the earlier overt and take the chain to F/N.) 23. JUMPED TO A DIFFERENT OVERT CHAIN? ________ (Reorient to the original chain and take it to F/N. Then flatten the chain the pc jumped to, if reading.) 24. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING? ________ (Get what it is, E/S to F/N.) 25. DID YOU TELL A HALF-TRUTH? ________ (Get all of the withhold, handle E/S to F/N.) 26. WAS THERE SOMETHING THE AUDITOR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT YOU THAT HE DIDN'T? ________ (Get what. Pull it E/S to F/N.) 27. WAS THERE AN UNDISCLOSED OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? ________ (Get it off as a missed W/H, E/S to F/N.) 28. HAS A CRIME BEEN COVERED UP? ________ (Pull it, E/S to F/N.) 29. WAS THERE MORE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN ABOUT SOME OVERT? ________ (Get it all, E/S to F/N.) 30. WAS THERE A QUESTION THAT THE AUDITOR SAID DIDN'T READ THAT SHOULD HAVE? ________ (Find out what question and get in Suppress and Inval on it. Then handle it to F/N.) 31. DID THE AUDITOR CALL AN F/N WHEN YOU DIDN'T FEEL YOU WERE F/Ning? ________ (Find the point and get in Suppress on it, and complete the action to F/N.) 32. DID YOU TELL A LIE? ________ (Handle as a W/H, to F/N.) 33. WAS A QUESTION LEFT UNFLAT? ________ (Find out which one, indicate it and handle to F/N.) 34. WAS AN F/N OVERRUN? ________ (Find out on what Sec Check question or overt chain and rehab.) 35. WAS AN F/N MISSED? ________ (Find out on what Sec Check question or overt chain and rehab.) 36. DID SOMEONE DEMAND A W/H YOU DIDN'T HAVE? ________ (Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N.) 37. HAD YOU TOLD ALL? ________ (Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N.) 38. WAS AN OVERT PROTESTED? ________ (Get what it was and get in Protest button on it. Fully clean up the overt to F/N.) 39. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? ________ (Get who wouldn't accept it or said it still read. Indicate it was a false read. 2WC the concern to F/N.) 40. DID YOU HAVE TO GET THE SAME WITHHOLD OFF MORE THAN ONCE? ________ (Handle as in #39.) 41. DID SOMEONE SAY YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN'T? ________ (Indicate it, 2WC E/S to F/N. For auditors trained to D/L, date to blow and locate to blow the first instance of the pc being told he had that W/H when he didn't.) 42. DID SOMEONE SAY OR SEEM TO INFER THAT SOMETHING READ WHEN IT DIDN'T? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N. For auditors trained to D/L, date to blow and locate to blow the first instance of the pc being told that.) 43. WAS THERE AN OVERT OR WITHHOLD THAT WASN'T ACCEPTED? ________ (Get what. Get who wouldn't accept it. Get off any protest and inval, and clean it up E/S to F/N.) 44. DID SOMEONE INVALIDATE YOU FOR GETTING OFF A WITHHOLD? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 45. DID SOMEONE PUNISH YOU FOR GETTING OFF A WITHHOLD? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 46. WAS THERE A FALSE ACCUSATION? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 47. NOT YOUR OVERT? ________ (Indicate it. If it doesn't F/N on indication, take it E/S to F/N.) 48. WERE YOU NOT HONEST WITH THE AUDITOR? ________ (Handle as a missed withhold, E/S to F/N.) 49. DID YOU HAVE AN INTENTION TO MAKE OTHERS WRONG? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for full service fac handling and False Purpose Rundown.) 50. WAS THERE A COMPUTATION YOU USED TO MAKE YOURSELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program for full service fac handling.) 51. FALSELY VILIFYING SOMEONE TO COVER UP AN EVIL PURPOSE? ________ (Get it off as an overt E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for Truth Rundown.) 52. WAS THERE AN EVIL PURPOSE? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose Rundown.) 53. WAS SOME BAD INTENTION NOT DISCOVERED? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose Rundown.) 54. WAS SOME HIDDEN EVIL IMPULSE NOT REVEALED? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose Rundown.) 55. WAS THERE SOME NONSURVIVAL CONSIDERATION YOU DIDN'T MENTION? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose Rundown.) 56. WERE YOU PRETENDING TO BE PTS TO AVOID TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR SOME OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? ________ (Handle as a withhold to F/N. Pull any overts.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose Rundown.) 57. DID THE AUDITOR NOT HEAR OR ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT YOU SAID? ________ (Indicate the BPC. Get what the auditor missed and clean it up E/S to F/N.) 58. DID THE AUDITOR GET ANGRY AT YOU? ________ (If this happened, indicate it is illegal to do so. 2WC E/S to F/N. Clean up any ARC break to F/N.) (C/S to program for a QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I.) 59. WERE THERE AUDITOR'S CODE BREAKS? ________ (Get what. Indicate it was illegal and 2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program for a QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I.) 60. WERE YOU AFRAID OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 61. WAS THERE AN INJUSTICE? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 62. WAS THERE A BETRAYAL? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 63. WAS ANYTHING SUPPRESSED? ________ (Clean it up E/S to F/N.) 64. WAS ANYTHING INVALIDATED? ________ (Clean it up E/S to F/N.) 65. WAS ANYTHING FALSIFIED? ________ (Clean it up as a W/H E/S to F/N.) 66. WAS ANYTHING PROTESTED? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 67. WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 68. WAS SOMETHING MISUNDERSTOOD? ________ (Clean it up, clearing any MU words each to F/N.) 69. WERE YOU TIRED OR HUNGRY? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N.) 70. HAD YOU RECENTLY TAKEN DRUGS? ________ MEDICINE? ________ ALCOHOL? ________ (2WC E/S to F/N. Note for C/S.) 71. WERE YOU BEING SEC CHECKED ON A WRONG AREA? ________ (2WC to F/N, getting the area or subject pc feels he should be sec checked on and noting these for the C/S.) 72. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? ________ (If so and it doesn't clean up on 2WC, GF M5 and handle.) 73. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED? ________ (2WC If so, indicate it to F/N.) L. RON HUBBARD Founder Revision assisted by LRH Technical Research and Compilations LRH:RTRC:rw.sep.ja  ****************************************************************** 25. HCOB 22 Aug. 1966 Floating Needles, Listing Processes HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 AUGUST 1966 Remimeo All Exec Hats Qual Hats Tech Hats HCO Hats FLOATING NEEDLES, LISTING PROCESSES In sessions where the process being run on a pc involves a listing question (including S&D), please note that after the listing question has been thoroughly cleared with the preclear and then given to the pc that the process IS being run. Should it happen, then, that while the pc is actually listing off the question (and has not gone momentarily out of session), the needle floats, this is the flat point or end phenomenon of the process and the whole subject and all further steps of it are dropped at once. Whatever charge was on the listing question has blown, either with or without the preclear being analytically aware of it. To continue the process beyond this point is out-tech by the process being overrun and is also a violation of our basic fast flow system. Please note that whether there is a second leg to the process or not, like fitting an item found off a list into a bracket of commands, has no bearing on the fact that the process is flat. If the needle floats while the pc is in-session listing off a question, then there is no charge left on that question and there will be no item to fit into the second leg of the process. The process has served its purpose. With training as immaculately precise as it is and auditors' comm cycles becoming effortlessly superlative, the gradients of our technology are so fine that the results of each process on each level will be achieved faster and faster. Sometimes the velocity of the processing is such that the end phenomenon will occur on the process without the preclear being aware of what has happened. Ending the process at this point then gives the preclear the chance to move into the velocity of the process. Please then acknowledge the power of our technology and keep winning. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:lb-r.cden.gm  ****************************************************************** 26. HCOB 1 Aug. 1968 The Laws of Listing and Nulling HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF I AUGUST 1968 Remimeo CLASS III, SOLO VI & VII, ACADEMY AND SHSBC REQUIRED REVIEWED FOR SOLO AND VII (Compiled from earlier HCOBs and tapes of the early 60s to give the exact stable data) THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING (Star-rate. No attestations allowed, Clay and demos required) The following laws are the ONLY important rules of listing and nulling. If an auditor doesn't know these, he will mess up pcs thoroughly and awfully. An auditor who doesn't know and can't apply these is not a Level III auditor. LAWS 1. The definition of a complete list is a list which has only one reading item on list. 2. A TA rising means the list is being overlisted (too long). 3. A list can be underlisted in which case nothing can be found on nulling. 4. If after a session the TA is still high or goes up, a wrong item has been found. 5. If pc says it is a wrong item, it is a wrong item. 6. The question must be checked and must read as a question before it is listed. An item listed from a nonreading question will give you a "dead horse," (no item). 7. If the item is on the list and nothing read on nulling, the item is suppressed or invalidated. 8. On a suppressed list, it must be nulled with suppressed. "On ______ has anything been suppressed." 9. On an item that is suppressed or invalidated, the read will transfer exactly from the item to the button and when the button is gotten in the item will again read. 10. An item from an overlisted list is often suppressed. 11. On occasion when you pass the item in nulling, all subsequent items will read to a point where everything on list will then read. In this case take the first which read on first nulling. 12. An underlisted and overlisted list will ARC break the pc and he may refuse to be audited until list is corrected, and may become furious with auditor and will remain so till it is corrected. 13. Listing and nulling or any auditing at all beyond an ARC break without handling the ARC break first, such as correcting the list or otherwise locating it, will put a pc into a "sad effect." 14. A pc whose attention is on something else won't list easily. (List and null only with the rudiments in on the pc.) 15. An auditor whose TRs are out has difficulty in listing and nulling and in finding items. 16. Listing and nulling errors in presence of Auditor's Code violations can unstabilize a pc. 17. The lack of a specific listing question or an incorrect nonstandard listing question which doesn't really call for item will give you more than one item reading on a list. 18. You cease listing and nulling actions when a floating needle appears. 19. Always give a pc his item and circle it plainly on the list. 20. Listing and nulling are highly precise auditing actions and if not done exactly by the laws may bring about a down tone and slow case gain, but if done correctly exactly by the laws and with good auditing in general will produce the highest gains attainable. NOTE: There are no variations or exceptions to the above. (Does not alter VA Power procedure.) A failure to know and apply this bulletin will result in the assignment of very low conditions as these laws, if not known or followed, can halt case gain. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.js.cden.gm  ****************************************************************** 27. HCOB 19 Sept 1968 "Old lists..." HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1968 Remimeo L&N Checksheet Class VIII Old lists are NOT TO BE COPIED. They are to be corrected in their original form but using a different colored pen to show what has been done -- always date new uses of these lists also using the same color pen as used for renulling or addition to them. When listing you always note down F, BDs, SF, LF, etc., next to the items. This is done AS YOU LIST. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.nt.rd.gm  ****************************************************************** 28. HCOB 7 Oct. 1968 Assessment HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 OCTOBER 1968 Class VIII (SH, ASHO) ASSESSMENT Assessment means the locating on a prepared list, one item. Listing and nulling means the pc lists. The laws of listing and nulling apply only to LISTING and nulling. It IS auditing. The actions of assessment do not apply to listing and nulling and never have. Assessment is from a prepared list. It was done around 1960. It still is used. It has its own actions. But as the prepared lists as in Prehav became bulky, I then developed a NEW action where the pc listed. DO NOT apply the rules of assessment, as in the E-Meter book, to listing and nulling. These are two different actions entirely. The key is that a list for assessment is always from a list prepared by the auditor or from an HCOB as in "7 resistive cases." S&Ds, Remedy Bs, etc., are LISTED by the pc and follow the LAWS of listing and nulling. This is assessment, a list prepared by the C/S or auditor, not the pc. To get a clue to what happened, the C/S prepares a list: Lions X Big Game / X Cats X Felines / X Tigers X Bearers X Trucks X Elephants X Killing F LFBD [Editor: this item is circled] Camping X Then the auditor nulls it to ONE item. This is then prepchecked or done on an L1 as a subject. When you list and null, the pc gives the list. Who got shot? Me X X Joe X X Bearers F / X Elephants X X Tigers LFBD F X The auditor nulls this (Xes and second action noted). TWO items are now reading so the auditor EXTENDS the list-- Ext IND --> The White Hunter F LFBD [Editor: this item is circled] The Dog X And then the auditor renulls the WHOLE list (second X, etc.) and only one item stays in, which is a complete list. That is the item. It is given to pc. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ei.rd.gm  ****************************************************************** 29. HCOB 20 Sept 1978 An Instant F/N is a Read HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978 Remimeo AN INSTANT F/N IS A READ Refs: HCOB 2 Nov. 68R CASE SUPERVISOR CLASS VIII THE BASIC PROCESSES HCOB 20 Feb. 70 FLOATING NEEDLES AND END PHENOMENA An instant F/N is an F/N which occurs instantly at the end of the major thought voiced by the auditor or at the end of the major thought voiced by the pc (when he originates items or tells what the command means). It will most usually be seen as a LFBD / F/N or a LF / F/N. So what does this mean, "An instant F/N is a read"? A read means there's charge there to handle. It means there is force connected with that significance which is available to the pc to view and run. It means that item is real to the pc. An F/N means something has keyed out. Now, a key-out is what we are looking for on many processes which are run. It means "Stop. End of process, end of rud, end of action." So an instant F/N does not always mean you should take up that item. To sort this out, you will have to understand the basic mechanics of key-out, key-in and erasure. It will then become clear why an F/N is a read and when it is taken up. To confuse this could really mess up a pc. For example, on ruds, Prepcheck questions, protest, overrun, rehabs, to name a few, an instant F/N would not be taken up. The EP of charge keyed out has been attained. But to ignore an instant F/N on Dianetic items and certain correction lists, etc., will leave the pc with bypassed charge and major areas of case unhandled. The key is "Is a handling required on the item or is an F/N the legitimate EP?" You will also have to understand that we are talking about INSTANT F/Ns. An F/N which continues to F/N through an assessment means "No Charge." An instant F/N on an item means charge has just keyed out on that item and that it can key back in again. There are actions, as in Dianetics, where a key-out is not what you are going for. You want the postulate off the basic incident of the chain, which indicates you have an erasure. In Dianetics an instant F/N takes precedence over all other reads. This is because the pc, having just keyed out the charge on that item, will find it most real. It will be the most runnable item. An instantly F/Ning item is taken up first. LFBD, LF, F and sF follow in their usual order. The use of this thing is mainly a C/S use. A C/S can look down a column of two-way comm or look down an L and N list and spot what F/Ned. If the C/S doesn't realize that this was the item, he can then take erroneously some LFBD item or F item out of the columns of two-way comm as the resulting item for that subject. The use of an F/N as a read is almost entirely relegated to the next C/S except when used in Dianetics. Example: A C/S is looking for the actual service facsimile in two- way comm. (You usually L and N to find service facs but you may have an instance where you found one in two-way comm.) The pc mentions several and finally one F/Ns. The C/S knows at once it is the service fac. Example: A two-way comm has operated as a list and the C/S is trying to reconstruct it. Unless he knows that an F/N is a read, he might overlook the actual item on that list which is the one which occurred immediately before the F/N. This is the item. When used in the session itself, the auditor has to know that an F/N is a read in doing L and N. The item which F/Ned is of course the item. In a Dianetic session it is not uncommon to find a brief F/N occurring on a list or a preassessment. In Dianetics we are not interested in key-outs. We are interested in chains and erasures. So the "hottest reading item" on the list is the one that gave an F/N. Usually it will be a BD F/N. If the Dianetic auditor does not know that an instant F/N is a read, he is likely to ignore the item that F/Ned. In Dianetics, you will find that an F/N taken up again will immediately key in, but this is what the Dianetic auditor wants. The Scientology auditor is usually handling other phenomena, and if he bypassed an F/N and kept on going, the TA would go up and he would have trouble. So the use of this principle is a very touchy thing and has to be understood. Of course, the first thing you have to know about is what an F/N looks like. This tech fully understood and applied will mean the difference between a case being fully handled and "just doing better." Understand it and use it. You'll see the difference in your results. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nc.mf.gm  ****************************************************************** 30. HCOB 22 Apr. 1980R Assessment Drills [encore] [FZBA Editor: This bulletin appears twice in the coursepack. Presumably this is because the Level 3 checksheet calls for this item to be studied at two different places on the checksheet. To save space we won't repeat the bulletin.] ****************************************************************** 31. HCOB 20 Apr. 1972 II Product Purpose and Why and W/C Error Correction C/S Series 78 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972 Issue II Remimeo C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND W/C ERROR CORRECTION Where untrained auditors are finding Whys for a Danger Formula, or post purposes or post products as called for in the Esto System, you will get a certain amount of error and case disturbance. Such upsets also come from Word Clearing by incompetent persons. The C/S should look for these especially when such campaigns are in progress. He should suspect them as a possibility when a case bogs. A C/S must be sure all such papers and worksheets get into pcs' folders. A common repair action is to 1. Do an assessment for type of charge. 2. Handle the charge found by the assessment done. 3. Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by two-way comm or direct handling. 4. Suspect LISTING ERRORS on any Why or purpose or product found, even though no list exists, and reconstruct the list and L4B and handle it. 5. Handle Word Clearing of any type in or out of session with a Word Clearing Correction List done in session by an auditor. 6. When Word Clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn't clean up, suspect he has been thrown into implants which are mostly words or the words in some engram. As implants are actually just engrams, handle it with an L3B. LISTING Any item found out of session or by a nonauditor is suspect of being a listing and nulling (L&N) error even though no list was made. TODAY A CORRECT L&N ITEM MUST BLOWDOWN AND F/N. So treat such items as you would list errors and try to reconstruct the list and either confirm the item or locate the real item (may have been invalidated and suppressed) or extend the list and get the real item. The real item will BD F/N. One can establish what the situation is with a post purpose, a Why or a product or any other such item by doing an L4B. SELF-AUDITING The commonest reason for self-auditing is a wrong or unfound L&N item. People can go around and self-list or self-audit trying to get at the right Why or product or purpose after an error has been made. REACTION NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A WRONG LIST. Even, rarely, a DIANETIC LIST can produce wrong list reactions. Ask the pc for his somatics and he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor. ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc come from out-lists. Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even illness. OUT-LISTS Therefore, when one gets a sharp change in a case (like lowered tone, violence, blows, "determination to go on in spite of the Supervisor," long notes from pcs, self C/Sing, etc., etc.), the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT-LIST. This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the item was said to BD F/N. It can occur in "coffee shop" (out of session auditing of someone) or by Estos or poorly trained or untrained staff members or even in life. PTS When such actions as finding items by nonauditors are done on PTS people, the situation can be bad, so one also suspects the person to be PTS to someone or something. "PTS" does not communicate well in an assessment question so one says, "Someone or something is hostile to you" and "You are connected to someone or something that doesn't agree with Dianetics or Scientology." REPAIRS The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a) that such situations as wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where untrained people are also using meters and (b) THAT IT IS UP TO THE C/S TO SUSPECT, DETECT AND GET THEM HANDLED IN REGULAR SESSION. Do not ignore the possible bad influence. As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a correct answer to forbid such actions. It is a correct answer to require all such actions and worksheets become part of the folder. One can also persuade the D of T or Qual to gen in the people doing such actions. And do not ignore the effect such actions can have on cases and do not neglect to include them in C/Ses before going on with the regular program. They can all be repaired. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd.gm  ****************************************************************** 32. HCOB 11 Apr. 1977 List Errors, Correction of HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1977 Remimeo Level III Level IV Snr Class IV Snr SHSBC Ex Dn All Class IV Auditors LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF It has been found that the correction of lists, a very vital piece of tech, has been a source of confusion in the field as it apparently has never been written up in an issue. It really is simple if you know your laws of L&N. VERIFYING A LIST The correct procedure for verifying/correcting past L&Ns is to check the items as to whether or not they are correct. Then do an L4BRA on each list where the item is found to be incorrect. You would have to orient the pc to the listing question and the item. You do not direct the question to see if it read. And don't just do an L4BRA and then not find the right item for the pc as part of the handling (unless the question proves to be uncharged or some such). NULLING A LIST One nulls a list when he doesn't get a BD F/N item on listing. The laws of L&N strictly apply. An L4BRA would be used if the action bogs with still no item found. One would also null lists the pc made where no item had been found, such as a two-way comm which turned into a listing action with the pc giving off items or a list the pc somehow made while not on a meter. In these cases there is no item to verify with the pc as correct. Just cull the items into a list, work out with the pc what the question was if it's not already noted, and null the list. RECONSTRUCTING A LIST Sometimes you just don't have the list and can't get it or it's an old Why Finding or PTS interview for which there are no worksheets. In this case you get from the pc what the question was and then get him to give you the items that were already on the list as the item probably was already on the list and you don't want the pc to get into newly listing the question in PT and then getting into an overlisting situation. Just get him to give you the items he had already put on the list and more often than not you will get a BD F/N item. If you don't get the item that way, then you can extend the list. SELF-LISTING Watch it on these, as every random stray thought a person has about "why this or that" does not mean it's a self-list. But do look for it on a person who is manifesting the horrendous BPC an out-list can generate, who is introspected or has been trying to figure out who is doing him in after just having seen the Ethics Officer. Just don't get into trying to make a list out of some nonstandard listing question that won't give you an item. And actually, the usual reason for self-listing is a prior wrong L&N item or an item not found. People will self-list to try to find the right item. So find and correct the earlier out-list. LIST CORRECTION BLOWUP When you are going along correcting lists and suddenly you get a big pc blowup and it is not resolving on the list you are correcting, you had better quickly realize that you probably are not correcting the list that is out and you'd better find out which list it is. There is usually an earlier out-list to be found, if the list you are correcting does not resolve the upset. LISTS NOT READING When you start getting key lists, such as Grades III and IV, not reading and no items found, it's time for that auditor to get a thorough overhaul on his metering, eyesight and to get off all his MUs on L&N. You also could be setting the pc up for a self- listing situation, as he has been given the listing question but no item has been found. So be very sure the question did not read even with Suppress and Inval and TRs were in before getting off a key L&N process. USE OF L4BRA The prepared list L4BRA corrects L&N lists. It can be run on old lists, current lists, general listing. When a pc is ill after a listing and nulling session or up to three days after, always suspect that a listing action done on the pc had an error in it and get those lists corrected. Sometimes it is obvious what the error was per the laws of listing and nulling. For example, there could be two reading items left on the list in which case you would know to extend the list as it has been underlisted. If this didn't go, then an L4BRA would be done on the list. HANDLING AN L4BRA You handle reading questions on the L4BRA by the directions under the question that read. You don't just two-way comm these questions. For example, say question 4 read on the L4BRA. "Is a list incomplete? SF." You then ask the pc, "What list is incomplete?" Locate it and get it completed to a BD F/N item. You don't just two-way comm "incomplete lists" to an F/N and leave it at that. By the way, the L4BRA is missing a line which is "Was it the first item on the list?" This is being added as it's quite common that it is the first item and is most often missed. DO IT RIGHT An out-list can create more concentrated hell with a pc than any other single auditing error. So it's imperative that listing errors get properly corrected. The best thing to do is to have the laws of listing and nulling drilled line by line and down cold and just do it right in the first place. Then you will also see at once where old lists violated these laws and you will not be yourself doing lists that have to be corrected later. L. RON HUBBARD Founder Assisted by CS-4/5 LRH:JE:dr.gm  ****************************************************************** 33. HCOB 15 Dec. 68RA L4BRA, For Assessment of All Listing Errors HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1968RA RE-REVISED 11 APRIL 1977 Remimeo L4BRA FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING ERRORS ASSESS THE WHOLE LIST (METHOD 5) THEN TAKE biggest reads or blowdowns and handle. Then clean up the list. PC'S NAME________________________________ DATE____________________ AUDITOR _________________________________ 0. WAS IT THE FIRST ITEM ON THE LIST? ________ (Indicate and give pc his item.) 1. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THE LISTING QUESTION? ________ (If it reads, find out what question, clear the question noting whether it reads, if so, list it, find the item and give it to the pc.) 2. WAS THE LIST UNNECESSARY? ________ (If it reads, indicate BPC and indicate that it was an unnecessary action.) 2A. DID THE QUESTION HAVE NO CHARGE ON IT? ________ (Indicate.) 2B. WERE YOU ASHAMED TO CAUSE AN UPSET? ________ (L1C after list corrected.) 2C. WERE YOU AMAZED TO REACT THAT WAY? ________ (Same as 2B.) 2D. THE QUESTION HAD ALREADY BEEN LISTED BEFORE? ________ (Indicate, rehab.) 2E. YOU HAD NO INTEREST IN THE QUESTION? ________ (Indicate that the auditor missed that it didn't read.) 3. WAS THE ACTION DONE UNDER PROTEST? ________ (If it reads, handle by itsa earlier-similar itsa.) 4. IS A LIST INCOMPLETE? ________ (If reads, find out what list and complete it, give the pc his item.) 5. HAS A LIST BEEN LISTED TOO LONG? ________ (If so, find what list and get the item from it by nulling with Suppress, the nulling question being "On ______ has anything been suppressed?" for each item on the overlong list. Give the pc his item.) 6. HAS THE WRONG ITEM BEEN TAKEN OFF A LIST? ________ (If this reads, put in Suppress and Invalidate on the list and null as in 5 above and find the right item and give to the pc.) 7. HAS A RIGHT ITEM BEEN DENIED YOU? ________ (If this reads, find out what it was and clean it up with Suppress and Invalidate and give it to the pc.) 8. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PUSHED OFF ON YOU YOU DIDN'T WANT? ________ (If so, find it and get in Suppress and Invalidate on it and tell pc it wasn't his item and continue the original action to find the correct item.) 9. HAD AN ITEM NOT BEEN GIVEN YOU? ________ (If reads, handle as in 7.) 10. HAVE YOU INVALIDATED A CORRECT ITEM FOUND? ________ (If so, rehab the item and find out why the pc invalidated it or if somebody else did it, clean it up and give it to pc again.) 11. HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF ITEMS THAT YOU DID NOT PUT ON THE LIST? ________ (If so, add them to the correct list. Renull the whole list and give the pc the item.) 12. HAVE YOU BEEN LISTING TO YOURSELF OUT OF SESSION? ________ (If so, find out what question and try to write a list from recall and get an item and give it to the pc.) 13. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN SOMEBODY ELSE'S ITEM? ________ (If so, indicate to the pc this was not his item. Don't try to find whose it was.) 14. HAS YOUR ITEM BEEN GIVEN TO SOMEONE ELSE? ________ (If so, find if possible what item it was and give it to the pc. Don't try to identify the "somebody else.") 14A. WERE EARLIER LISTING ERRORS RESTIMULATED? ________ (Indicate and correct earlier lists then check the current.) 14B. HAD THIS LIST ALREADY BEEN HANDLED? ________ (Indicate.) 15. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BYPASSED ON LISTING? ________ (If so, indicate the overrun to the pc, rehab back.) 16. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BYPASSED ON THE QUESTION ONLY? ________ (If so, indicate the overrun to the pc and rehab back.) 17. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR WHILE LISTING? ________ (If so, rehab. If Ext Rundown not given, note for C/S.) 18. HAS IT BEEN AN OVERT TO PUT AN ITEM ON A LIST? ________ (If so, find out what item and why.) 19. HAVE YOU WITHHELD AN ITEM FROM A LIST? ________ (If so, get it and add it to the list if that list available. If not, put item in the report.) 20. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? ________ (If so, get it; if discreditable ask "Who nearly found out?") 21. HAS AN ITEM BEEN BYPASSED? ________ (Locate which one.) 22. WAS A LISTING QUESTION MEANINGLESS? ________ (If so, find out which one and indicate to the pc.) 23. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ABANDONED? ________ (If so, locate it and get it back for the pc and give it to him.) 24. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PROTESTED? ________ (If so, locate it and get the Protest button in on it.) 25. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ASSERTED? ________ (if so, locate it and get in the Assert button on it.) 26. HAS AN ITEM BEEN SUGGESTED TO YOU BY ANOTHER? ________ (If so, get it named and the protest and refusal off.) 27. HAS AN ITEM BEEN VOLUNTEERED BY YOU AND NOT ACCEPTED? ________ (If so, get off the charge and give it to the pc, or if he then changes his mind on it, go on with the listing operation.) 28. HAS THE ITEM ALREADY BEEN GIVEN? ________ (If so, get it back and give it again.) 29. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FOUND PREVIOUSLY? ________ (If so, find what it was again and give it to the pc once more.) 30. HAS AN ITEM NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD? ________ (If so, work it over with buttons until pc understands it or accepts or rejects it and go on with listing.) 30A. WAS THE LISTING QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD? ________ (Get defined and check for read. It may be unreading. If so, indicate that an uncharged question was listed because it read on a misunderstood.) 30B. WAS A WORD IN THE QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD? ________ (Same as 30A.) 31. WAS AN ITEM DIFFERENT WHEN SAID BY THE AUDITOR? ________ (If so, find out what the item was and give it to the pc correctly.) 31A. DID THE AUDITOR SUGGEST ITEMS TO YOU THAT WERE NOT YOURS? ________ (Indicate as illegal to do so. Correct the list, removing these.) 32. WAS NULLING CARRIED ON PAST THE FOUND ITEM? ________ (If so, go back to it and get in Suppress and Protest.) 33. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FORCED ON YOU? ________ (If so, get off the reject and suppress and get the listing action completed to the right item if possible.) 34. HAS AN ITEM BEEN EVALUATED? ________ (If so, get off the disagreement and protest.) 35. HAD EARLIER LISTING BEEN RESTIMULATED? ________ (If so, locate when and indicate the bypassed charge. Find and correct the earlier out-list.) 36. HAS AN EARLIER WRONG ITEM BEEN RESTIMULATED? ________ (If so, find when and indicate the bypassed charge. Find and correct the earlier out-list.) 37. HAS AN EARLIER ARC BREAK BEEN RESTIMULATED? ________ (If so, locate and indicate the fact by itsa earlier-similar itsa.) 38. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK BECAUSE OF BEING MADE TO DO THIS? ________ (If so, indicate it to the pc. Handle the ARC break. Correct the list if it's a list ARC break.) 39. HAS THE LIST CORRECTION BEEN OVERRUN? ________ (If so, rehab.) 39A. WAS THE LIST DONE WHILE YOU ALREADY HAD AN ARC BREAK, PTP OR W/H? ________ 39B. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE? ________ 39C. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THE AUDITOR? ________ 39D. DIDN'T THE AUDITOR ACKNOWLEDGE YOU? ________ 40. IS THERE SOME OTHER KIND OF BYPASSED CHARGE? ________ (If so, find what and indicate it to pc.) 41. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE? ________ (If so, indicate it to pc.) 42. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED? ________ (If so, indicate it to the pc.) 43. HAS A LIST PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN? ________ (If so, find which one and rehab.) L. RON HUBBARD Founder Assisted by CS-4/5 LRH:JE:Idm.rw.dz.rr.nt.dr.kjm.gm  ****************************************************************** 34. HCOB 6 Aug. 1968 R3H HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 AUGUST 1968 Remimeo LEVEL III IMPORTANT--STAR-RATED R3H (Takes precedence over all other HCOBs and tapes) The way to handle the ARC breaks of a case with R3H as the process for Level III is 1. Locate a change in life by listing to a blowdown. Use that period. "What change has happened in your life" is a version of the question. 2. Get it dated. 3. Get some of the data of it (don't run as an engram) so you know what the change was. 4. Find out by assessment if this was a break in Affinity Reality Communication or Understanding and have the pc examine that briefly. 5. Taking the one found in (4), find out by assessment if it was Curious about _________ Desired _______________ Enforced ______________ Inhibited _____________ That is all there is to it. That was the research process. It works like a bomb. To make sure it works well, get in the rudiments before you do it. ---------- It has been said that you can do this several times on a pc beyond a floating needle on one. I have not verified this. ---------- Doing Know-Unknown-Curious, etc., first is definitely wrong. ARC is dominant. ARC is done first as above. Understanding is the composite of ARC and so is added to ARC as U in (4) above. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.js.cden.gm