A Freezone Bible Supporter Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s being posted in 11 parts. Contents below following the FZ Bible mission statement. Much Love, Tech Lover ************************************************** FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** ******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ******** Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976, Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this] Dark blue soft cardboard cover 8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US. This is complete including book excerpts but does not include the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the level (it was posted to the internet last year). This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but we are working on those and will post them eventually. Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent "reissued as BTB" designation. Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating where they are to be used. A common distribution is "remimeo" which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines. Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central Orgs Continental". Others such as "D of T" (director of training) refer to posts in the Scientology organization. ******** CONTENTS: part 1 01. BPL 26 JAN 72R SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET 02. HCOPL 7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working 03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades 04. HCOB 11 JUN 64 New Student Data 05. HCOB 25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study 06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors 07. BPL 17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions 08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing part 2 09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior 10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology 11. HCOB 27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality 12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech 13. HCOPL 8 JUN 70 Student Auditing 14. BPL 25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades 15. HCOB 25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full 16. BTB 20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills 17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code part 3 18. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets 19. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form 20. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form 21. BTB 20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report 22. BTB 6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report 23. HCOPL 8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form 24. BTB 5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary 25. BTB 24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet 26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms 27. HCOB 16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized part 4 28. HCOB 24 OCT 71 False TA 29. HCOB 24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 30. HCOB 15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2 31. HCOB 18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3 32. HCOB 29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist 33. HCOB 23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA 34. HCOB 21 OCT 68 Floating Needle 35. HCOB 11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC 36. HCOB 21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle 37. HCOB 20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena 38. HCOB 8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N 39. HCOB 21 MAR 74 End Phenomena 40. HCOB 14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything 41. HCOB 14 OCT 68 Meter Position 42. BTB 14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams" 43. HCOB 18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors 44. BTB 16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills 45. HCOB 11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check 46. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering 47. HCOB 10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching part 5 48. HCOB 7 APR 64 Q And A 49. HCOB 3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption 50. HCOB 5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa 51. HCOB 7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs 52. HCOB 17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles 53. BTB 4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears 54. BTB 17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors 55. HCOB 29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels 56. BTB 26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators 57. HCOPL 4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech 58. HCOB 14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands 59. BTB 2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands 60. BTB 18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session 61. HCOB 12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds 62. HCOB 23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights 63. HCOB 6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing part 6 64. HCOB 30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle 65. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing 66. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines 67. HCOB 23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle 68. HCOB 23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing part 7 69. HCOB 12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement 70. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand 71. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements 72. HCOPL 1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives 73. HCOB 29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes 74. HCOB 17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions 75. BOOK Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes part 8 76. HCOB 16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference part 9 77. HCOB 20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process 78. HCOB 16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running 79. HCOB 8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes 80. HCOB 9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two 81. HCOB 20 APR 60 Processes 82. HCOB 27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire 83. BTB 9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills 84. BTB 15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads 85. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-31 86. PAB 8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing part 10 87. PAB 18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear 88. HCOB 17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions 89. HCOB 4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process 90. HCOB 2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command 91. HCOB 25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit 92. HCOB 21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes 93. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-60 94. HCOB 13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale 95. HCOB 7 MAY 59 New Process Theory 96. BOOK Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5 97. HCOB 11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes 98. HCOB 26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded part 11 99. BTB 9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills 100. BTB 15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads ******** 77. HCOB 20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER AD9 HCO Secs Franchise Holders D of P Central Orgs AN EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS Recall Processes have always worked well. But it has been hard to get the most fundamental processes that would reach the lowest cases. Here are some Recall Processes that work way down South of the Auks: COMM RECALL PROCESS: "Recall a Communication" KNOW MYSTERY RECALL PROCESSES: "Recall an Unconsciousness" "Recall Waiting" "Recall a Mystery" "Recall Sex" "Recall Eating" (or a variation "Recall Food") "Recall a Symbol" "Recall Thinking" "Recall an Effort" "Recall an Emotion" "Recall Looking" "Recall Knowing" "Recall Not-Knowing" These are very good, especially on bad off cases. They all work. When the lowest seems flat one can go to one above. Probably there is an E-Meter tellingness that denotes flatness. I'm working on this and will have the gen soon. The earliest experiments of this were on "Recall a Mystery" as a method of raising IQ and the pc was spouting poetry he'd "forgotten". There are many possible versions of these simplicities as one can run them on terminals and significances. Also, remember that these things (Recall Processes) take the pc out of PT and put him back in. You stop one with the PC back in PT. The Comm bridge to be used on this process is: "When you next get an answer close to present time we will end this process if it is all right with you." Then don't go on for an hour or two, catch it with 8 or 10 commands by seeing the pc is doing a short cycle at the time and has started back up. "Recall Exhaustion" is a simple, very effective version of a work process. "Recall Creating" is a good way, apparently, to mop up Step 6 flubs. Therefore you can use these processes in the HGC or you can, when it is okayed, use them in training. These are individual processes and not co-audit. As a note on co-audit, the process, the only basic affinity process, "What would you like to confront," could cut your co-audit attendance losses. It is now allowed, having been carefully tested. Man, do they get interested in cases and hence into session. This is a fine individual process for pcs that "have no reality on pictures". L. RON HUBBARD LRH :js.rd Copyright c 1959 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 78. HCOB 16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. HCO BULLETIN OF 16 FEBRUARY 1959 HGC PROCESSES FOR THOSE TRAINED IN ENGRAM RUNNING OR TRAINED IN THESE PROCESSES STARTING A CASE: BEGIN EVERY SESSION AS FOLLOWS WITH THESE RUDIMENTS. USE RUDIMENTS. FIND THE AUDITOR, FIND THE PC, FIND THE AUDITING ROOM. ESTABLISH A GOAL FOR THE SESSION. ASK FOR PRESENT TIME PROBLEM. PRESENT TIME PROBLEM: If PTP exists then run it as follows and in no other way. Do not yak around about it. Just ask if there is one, see if one registers on the meter. On the PT PROBLEM THAT REGISTERS ON THE METER (not some other one) do the following. Ask for and write down all the persons connected with this problem. That problem includes the preclear. On each of these persons, one after the other, beginning with the one most real to the pc, run this: "Think of something you have done to (selected person)." "Think of something you have withheld from (selected person)." These commands are run one after the other until the selected person chosen is somewhat flat. (Pc begins to repeat things he has recalled before.) Do this to each person involved in the problem. PT PROBLEMS WERE CUT OUT OF HGC BECAUSE AUDITORS BURNED UP HALF AN INTENSIVE ON THEM. A PT PROBLEM NEVER REQUIRES MORE THAN A COUPLE OF HOURS TO FLATTEN. NO "WHEN" IS USED WITH PT PROBLEM BY SELECTED PERSONS. USE RUDIMENTS AND CHECK PT PROBLEM EACH SESSION AND HANDLE AS ABOVE. DYNAMIC STRAIGHT WIRE: Do a survey, one time on the pc, not every session, to discover any errors in their dynamics. This is done with an E-Meter. On pcs not familiar with Sci. terms use the following words: Self, sex, family, children, groups, mankind, the animal kingdom, birds, beasts, fish, vegetables, trees, growing things, matter, energy, space, time, spirits, souls, gods, God. Assess with this question only, "Tell me something that would represent (each of the above, one after the other)." When one changes the pattern of the needle action or when it is definitely balmy, write it down. When list is completed, take those items written down and run: "Think of something you have done to (selected terminal you wrote down)." "Think of something you have withheld from (selected terminal, same one)." Run these questions on each, one after the other, until pc seems flat. IF NO DAFFY TERMINALS ARE FOUND ON SURVEY, SURVEY IT ALL AGAIN. IF NONE ARE FOUND THIS SECOND TIME, SKIP THIS PROCESS. DO THIS ONLY ONCE PER AUDITOR PER PC. PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE: This process goes rapidly into engrams but can be continued even if engrams are contacted. Run these two questions one after the other, one time per each. "What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?" "What part of the future would you be willing to experience?" KEEP AN ACCURATE RECORD OF ANY ENGRAMS CONTACTED. WHEN ENGRAMS PERSIST IN THE PC'S VIEW, CAREFULLY SPOT THEM IN TIME FOR HIM. ENGRAM RUNNING: Find the engram necessary to resolve the case. ONCE YOU HAVE CHOSEN IT AND HAVE BEGUN TO RUN IT, BE SURE YOU HAVE THE MOTIVATOR AND THE OVERT AND THEN DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT DEPART FROM THAT INCIDENT TO RUN ANOTHER THAT "DROPS BETTER" OR COMES UP. IN OTHER WORDS ONCE YOU HAVE FOUND AN INCIDENT STAY ON IT UNTIL IT IS FLAT. NOT-IS STRAIGHT WIRE: When you have flattened an engram thoroughly with all five commands gone over twice, run Not-Is Straight Wire between incidents. In other words, flatten an engram, then run Not-Is Straight Wire, get that a bit flat and locate and run the next incident. Selected Person Overt Withhold, and General Overt and Withhold can be run on a pc only if they are biting. This is also true of Not-Is Straight Wire. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:-.rd Copyright c 1959 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 79. HCOB 8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL AD 8 Issue II A PAIR OF PROCESSES Now and then I overhaul some old process once in use and see what can be done to make it work. Op Pro by Dup and Forgetting are a pair that recently showed up as having a possible specific value—i.e. to create a specific effect upon a specific difficulty. Evidently Admiration and Critical are a dichotomy. Maxine Kozak suggests that Duplication is Admiration. From this I looked over Critical on the APA (OCA) profile and saw that the low critical might be influenced by Op Pro by Dup. A test should be made of this. The other process is less nebulous in action. The specific for a bad memory is Forgetting run in Brackets. You will ordinarily find an automaticity of forgetting when you ask "Recall something you wouldn't mind other people forgetting." This is a "bad memory". Nothing like a good conscience to retain a good memory. The commands of Forgetting would be a 6-way bracket. Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind 1. Forgetting yourself 2. Another person forgetting 3. Forgetting about another 4. Another forgetting about you 5. Other people forgetting 6. Another person forgetting about another person. Each command is cleared. The commands are run in sequence rather than repetition. This is a low scale process. Goes lower than "Not know" but graduates into it. This is a basic on unknowns and fields of whatever kind. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:bt.cden Copyright c 1958 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Ed Note: This bulletin was also reproduced verbatim in PAB 143] ******** 80. HCOB 9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MARCH 1960 Fran Hldrs Central Orgs EXPANSION OF OT-3A PROCEDURE, STEP TWO HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES Step Two of OT-3A Procedure is as follows: Run Cause ARC Straight Wire to give pc a win on getting audited. Once each over and over. End process only with pc in present time on cycle. "Recall communicating to someone" "Recall a time you felt affinity for someone" "Recall something that is really real to you" Now people do have time tracks, the time span of the individual from beingness to present time on which lies the sequence of events of his total existence. And when the preclear is in session and is being run on a recall type process, he, with his attention, goes up and down this time track. He may recall things only from this life or he may recall things from his whole past track; but however that may be, his attention cycles from early on the track to present time or from present time to early on the track to present time. This is known as the cycle aspect of recall type processes. In ending such a process, it is of utmost importance that the auditor end it with the preclear in present time on the cycle. The auditor wants to watch ending the process when the preclear has not made a smooth cycle into present time, but has made a big jump from way back in the past to present time. In such a case, the preclear has really bounced out of the past incident into present time, and it is only an apparency that the preclear is in present time. So when ending such a process, the auditor must exert caution to be certain the preclear is in present time. Being left with one's attention back on the track is not a comfortable sensation and sometimes can be quite painful, despite any justification offered by an auditor who himself has no reality on the time track, and I hope there are no such auditors. With Cause ARC Straight Wire, the auditor must forget his fastidiousness about ending the process precisely so on the last command, "Recall something that is really real to you." He ends the process, no matter on what command of Cause ARC Straight Wire, when the preclear's attention has come into or close to present time, close to present time being the last day or two. In ending such a process the communication bridge used is as follows: "The next time you come close to present time I am going to end this process." He continues to give the commands using the question, "When was that?", after each answer the preclear gives and before the acknowledgement. When the preclear gives an answer close to present time, he says, "That was the last command of that process; end of process." Bang. With processes that cycle, there can be no communication bridges like, "If it's alright with you in a few more commands I am going to end this process." It could take fifty more commands until the preclear is close to present time; and by that time, the preclear has entirely forgotten that there ever was any intention on the auditor's part to end the process as it seems to him that the auditor must have changed his mind and decided to run the process longer than a few commands. An auditor should not get upset with a preclear when the auditor, in an effort to get the preclear to give an answer right in present time, starts the preclear back down the time track again. Remember it is the auditor who calls the shot, and if he misses, then he had better learn to gage it a bit better. A good auditor allows himself time in which to properly end a process. Now two further cyclic processes which can be seen under Step Two of OT-3A are: 1. "What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?" 2. "What would you permit to have happen again?" These are called Cause Elementary Straight Wire and are two separate processes which are not to be run alternately. The first process puts the preclear at cause over forgetting, and the second process rehabilitates the preclear's ability to duplicate. These are both terrific processes in turning on recall in the preclear. All processes under Step Two are unlimited, with the "make forgotten" one only slightly less unlimited as it has a bit of a tendency to run down havingness. Havingness, however, should be checked upon in each session and run as needed. The auditor should not consider Step Two of OT-3A lightly. These processes are, in reality, very potent and will certainly do more for CCH-step cases than anything we have had before. An example of this is how preclears broke through from psychosis to neurosis to sanity with the simplified version of ARC Straight Wire as given in the original Self Analysis. So use these processes and win faster. Note: On second thoughts for purposes of differentiation, the first process, "What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?", should be termed Cause Elementary Straight Wire; and the second process, "What would you permit to have happen again?", shall be called Duplication Straight Wire. These two processes were first used in early Advanced Clinical Courses in Phoenix and were called at that time "Elementary Straightwire". The commands of "Elementary Straightwire" as given in Dianetics 1955 were: "Give me something you wouldn't mind remembering" and "Give me something you wouldn't mind forgetting". As the ability to recall depends upon the mechanisms of forgetting and remembering (the ability to duplicate) you can easily understand the importance of these in Step Two of OT-3A. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:js.rd Copyright © 1960 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 81. HCOB 20 APR 60 Processes [Ed. Note: This was an HCOB and is on the checksheet but it was not by Ron and therefore is not in the Tech volumes. It is present in the 1974 pack but missing from the 1976 one.] HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF APRIL 20, 1960 CenO. Franchise Holders PROCESSES Dick Halpern, in charge of the First South African ACC in Johannesburg, has sent a dispatch to Ron in which he states that Cause Elementary Straight Wire is most suitable for raising low tone arms, while Duplication Straight Wire is most suitable for lowering high tone arm. Dick has tested this on ACC students, and found the results excellent. The command of Cause Elementary Straight Wire is "What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?" The command of Duplication Straight Wire is: "What would you permit to have happen again?" Issued by:- PETER HEMERY HCO Secretary WW for L. RON HUBBARD LRH:js:mb Copyright c. 1960 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 82. HCOB 27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968 Issue II Remimeo All Dianetic Courses ARC STRAIGHT WIRE (Corrects HCO B 30 June 1962 and also in the HDA Course book. Corrects p. 102 [soft-cover edition] of Self Analysis.) (Paste over HDA Course page 15.) (Corrects earlier HCO B of same date & title.) The correct commands for ARC Straight Wire, as researched and as successful in test in cracking even neurotic cases, with one command added to modernize it, were and are: Recall a time that was really real to you. Recall a time you were in good communication with someone. Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone. Recall a time you knew you understood something. Run ONLY on a Meter. Run ONLY to Floating Needle and NOT beyond. (Don't abruptly cut pc's Comm.) A true fact is that ARC always must precede an ARC Break. Also ARC = Understanding and Time. A = Space and the willingness to occupy the same space of. R = Mass or agreement. C = Energy or Recognition. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ei.rd Copyright c 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 83. BTB 9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N 9 OCTOBER 1971 RA REVISED 8 AUGUST 1973 REVISED & REISSUED 28 JUNE 1974 AS BTB ( REVISION IN ITALICS ) Remimeo Level 0 Chksht Level VI Chksht CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 9 OCTOBER 1971 R SAME TITLE Auditor Drills Series No. 1RA ARC STRAIGHTWIRE DRILLS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON CORRECT APPLICATION OF SELF ANALYSIS PROCESSING. PURPOSE: To improve the quality of auditing by familiarizing Auditors with the exact procedure of each auditing action through the use of drills. HOW TO USE: These drills are in order by levels . The first number indicates the level taught on. Those that begin with TR 00 - ( drill No . ) are Level Zero Drills . The double zero is to differentiate the drills from TR 0-4. Unbullbaited drills end in odd numbers; and bullbaited end in even numbers. Most drills are done within the basic formats as laid out. Any that don't will be fully covered in the specific drills themselves. Simply start with the first actions and work through the drills in the order given as it's the same order as the ARC ST. Wire Expanded Grade BTB 4 Jan 72 RA. Each drill is done until you know you can do it flawlessly, even while being bullbaited. If a student has trouble on a drill, locate whether the student has a misunderstood or has a skipped gradient and handle either or both with standard Study Tech. This can lead back to outnesses on basics such as TRs, codes or scales. Whatever it is, find out why and handle. NOTE: If coach upset occurs because of restimulation, fruit words should be inserted in the place of the process Key Words, for bullbaited drills only. FORMAT FOR UNBULLBAITED DRILLS NAME: Auditing on a doll unbullbaited. COMMANDS: As for each separate process. PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action with the actual doingness of auditing. POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter, worksheets and auditing forms as needed. In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying the position of the PC. (During drill the coach is seated or standing beside the Auditor. He does not take the position of the doll.) TRAINING STRESS: This drill is coached. The student sets up the E-Meter and worksheets exactly as in a session - as follows: 1. Set up E-Meter as for E-Meter drills. 2. Set up shield to prevent TA and admin being seen by PC (doll). 3. Have extra pens under the E-Meter. 4. Have C/S face down between the bottom of the E-Meter and the table. 5. Have W/S and Lists readily available in sequence required for the session. Auditor starts the session and runs a standard session with the particular auditing action being taken up on the doll, keeping full session admin and using all standard procedures of the auditing action. Coach watches drill and points out any outnesses noted giving a"that's it"and a re-start. Outnesses should be handled one at a time until none exist.. The drill is done on a steeper and steeper gradient until the student can very quickly do the action correctly. The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with good TRs 0-4, correct procedure and commands, without comm lags or confusion; ie. flawlessly! FORMAT TO BE USED FOR BULLBAITED DRILLS NAME: Auditing _____________ Bullbaited. COMMANDS: As for each separate auditing action. PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action in a drill similar to a real auditing session and thereby become flawless in applying it. POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and Auditor forms, as needed. In the chair opposite the Auditor is a doll as PC. Coach sits beside doll and is the bullbaiter and gives answers as PC, not about his own case. TRAINING STRESS: The drill is the same as for auditing on a doll except that the "PC"coach bullbaits the student Auditor using "fruit"answers during the session in an attempt to throw the student off session. On any list, the coach squeezes the cans to simulate reads. He still uses "fruit"answers (six apples, blue pears) when asked to speak, but as the student Auditor reads off the list items (eg. L3RF) he squeezes the cans for reads. When bullbaiting an auditing action the coach should THROW IN VARIOUS SIGNS OF PC OUT OF SESSIONNESS. (Per HCOB on Good Indicators and BTB on Bad Indicators.) The student Auditor must: 1. Obnose the out of sessionness. 2. Align this to the process run. 3. Handle. An example is, on a Listing and Nulling procedure an out of sessionness is observed, the Auditor queries and follows through with an L4BRA at once. (An L4BRA is a repair list.) The PC bullbaiter can throw in situations, originate troubles or gains, be tricky, etc. But he must never lose sight of HCOB 24 May 1968 "Coaching", especially the second paragraph -" Coach with reality". Once the coach throws out a situation, etc. he must allow the student Auditor to carry it out, and handle the situation before the coach calls a new situation. Stress is on training the student Auditor to have his TRs 0 - 4 in on the bullbaiter. The coach (bullbaiter) does the "start", flunking or "That's it". Flunks are given for any improper commands, procedure, comm lags, break in TRs or improper session admin. Each drill is to be done thoroughly, building up the speed of Auditor commands and actions. ("It's the number of auditing commands per unit of auditing time which makes gains in a session." LRH) When the student Auditor has done these steps to his satisfaction, he gets a starrate checkout. The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with excellent TRs 0 -4, correct procedure and commands, without comm lags or confusion. These are the drills that train the student Auditor to handle all the elements in a session, so be exact and be real. NOTE: Clearing of commands is per BTB 2 May 72R and other Bulletins and PLs on the subject (ie. clearing each word of command backwards). TR 00-1 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" UNBULLBAITED. TR 00-2 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" BULLBAITED. Ref. Dianetics ‘55 STEPS: 1. R- factor to PC that you are going to run ARC Straightwire Expanded processes. Clear "ARC", "What does ARC mean to you?" Then clear the words "Straightwire and expanded" in the same way. Use a Scientology and regular dictionary do clear up any the PC doesn't know or has confusion on. Make sure the PC understands what is going to happen and is happy to be run on the processes, and that a good Auditor - PC- Auditor Comm Cycle is in. 2. Tell the PC "The first process of ARC SW Expanded is a repetitive process." Clear the word "repetitive"so that the PC understands how the process is to be run. Tell the PC that when he has carried out the auditing command he should tell you what he recalled or thought of, not just an answer like "yes"to the command (ref. HCOB 30 June 62). This applies to all processes of this level and PC must understand this. 3. Clear the command with the PC - "What is the definition of the word ___________ ?" Clear the word "something"first - then the word "remember". 4. Run the process repetitively, same command over and over, to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-3 "RECALL A TIME" UNBULLBAITED TR 00-4 "RECALL A TIME" BULLBAITED Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 18 Feb 59 STEPS: l. R-factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW process. This is a repetitive process." 2. Clear the command - "What is the definition of the word __________ ?" clear "Time, A, Recall" in that order. Be sure to use the Scientology Dictionary definition of"recall". 3. Run the process repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-5 COMM RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED. TR 00-6 COMM RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED. Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process STEPS: 1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called Comm Recall Process. "Make sure PC understands that "Comm" is short for "Communication". Tell PC - "This is a repetitive process." 2. Clear the command word by word backwards as in the above drills. 3 . Run the process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs . TR 00-7 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS UNBULLBAITED TR 00-8 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process STEPS: 1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called The Only Basic Affinity Process." 2. Tell PC "This process has three commands, each is run separately in a repetitive manner." 3. Clear the first command as in the earlier drills. 4. Run the first process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 5. R-factor - "Now we'll run the second command." 6. Clear the second command as in the earlier drills. 7. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 8. R-factor - "Now we'll run the third command." 9. Clear the third command as in the earlier drills. 10. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-9 EXHAUSTION UNBULLBAITED TR 00-10 EXHAUSTION BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process STEPS: 1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called 'Exhaustion'. This is a repetitive process with one command. 2. Clear the command as in the earlier drills. 3. Run the process command repetititvely to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-11 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE UNBULLBAITED TR 00-12 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those trained in engram running or trained in these processes. STEPS: 1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called "Past and Future Experience". This process has two commands which are run alternately, one after the other, over and over. 2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. Then clear the second command. 3. Run the process commands alternately (1-2-1-2, etc. ) over and over until the PC has F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-13 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET UNBULLBAITED TR 00-14 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 8 April 58 A Pair of Processes PAB 143 STEPS: 1 . R-factor - "We are going to run a process called 'Forgetting'. It has six commands, each of which is run by itself repetitively." 2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. PC must understand that he is to recall when he himself forgot something. 3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs . 4. R-factor. "Now we'll run the second command." 5. Clear the second command. 6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. Repeat steps 4 - 7 on each command 3 through 6 in turn (R - factor each time refers to "third command", "fourth command", etc.) TR 00-15 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED TR 00-16 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two HGC allowed processes. HCOB 20 April 60 Processes. STEPS: 1. R - factor - "We are going to run a process called 'Cause Elementary Straightwire'. Clear the words "Cause" and "Elementary". This process has three commands; each is run by itself repetitively. 2 . Clear the first command. 3. Run the first command of the process repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 4. R-factor "Now we are going to run the second command." 5. Clear the second command. 6. Run the second command of the process repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. R - factor - "Now we are going to run the third command." 8. Clear the third command. 9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-17 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED TR 00-18 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two HGC Allowed Processes. STEPS: 1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called ‘Duplication Straightwire'." Clear the word "Duplication" with the PC. "This process has three commands , each run by itself repetitively." 2. Clear the first command. 3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second command." 5. Clear the second command. 6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. R - Factor "Now we are going to run the third command." 8. Clear the third command. 9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. TR 00-19 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED TR 00-20 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale STEPS: 1. R- factor "We are going to run the ‘Know to Mystery Recall Process'. This process is used with a scale called the Know to Mystery Scale. It has a number of commands, each of which is run by itself repetitively." 2. Clear the first command. 3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 4. R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command." 5. Clear the second command. 6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. Do steps 4 - 6 on each command in turn 3 through 13 ( R - factor on each matches the number of the command"third command","fourth command", etc. Also that command is the one cleared and then run). TR 00-21 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS UNBULLBAITED TR 00-22 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS BULLBAITED Ref: Book - Self Analysis PAB 46 R-FACTOR TO AUDITOR: It is very important that the Auditor have a fuIl understanding of the purpose and technique of Self Analysis processing. This data is contained in the book and must be thoroughly studied with particular attention to the "Processing Section." THESE PROCESSES PREPARE THE PC'S CASE FOR AUDITING ON DIANETICS. In running these lists the Auditor directs the PC to moments action took place, not when somebody said it took place or merely the concept that it did happen. YOU GET THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL OCCURRENCE. Each time you ask the PC to recall an incident of a certain kind you then ask, after he recalls it, to pay attention to a certain sense channel which was present during the time he experienced it. The circular disc is provided for the purpose of directing which sense to pay particular attention to. You place the disc over the question you are going to ask and the sense perception at the top is asked for. When you go to the next list question you move the disc over it and rotate it one sense counter-clock- wise so that you have a new sense to ask for. When you go to a new page of questions in the book you turn over the disc so that you have a new set of senses to ask for. If you don't have a disc use the same senses as listed on the bottom of each page and tick them off one after the other as you go along. The Auditor should make sure that the PC speaks aloud the things he is recalling. The preclear's nod or "yes" to signify that he has recalled something is insufficient. Have him select an actual moment in his life called for by the question. Try to get him to re-sense that moment with the perceptic called for on the disc. If the PC finds it extremely difficult to recall any one question in these lists, simply pass over it and go to the next question. You can go over a list more than once if the PC does not reach EP the first time through. STEPS: 1. R- factor to PC - "We are now going to run the Self Analysis lists from the book Self Analysis. I will be asking you to recall specific incidents in your life. Try to recall the moment it actually occurred, not just the concept that it did occur. When you have recalled it tell me what it is. Then I will ask you to pay particular attention to a certain sense perception in the incident. Try to re-sense that moment with the perceptic called for." 2. Clear the sense perceptics with the PC. Clear "emotion"as that emotion the PC felt at the time of the incident. Clear "loudness" as the loudness of the various sounds in the incident. Clear "body position" as the position of his own body at the time the incident occurred. Clear "sound" as those sounds in the incident. Clear "weight" as the heaviness of the things , including the pull of gravity on the PC and the weight of anything he may actually be supporting in the incident such as his clothes, a ball or and other thing which he is actually holding at the time the incident occurred. Clear "personal motion" as the motion which the PC himself was undertaking at the time the incident occurred. Clear "sight" as what the PC actually saw at the time the incident was taking place. Clear "smell" as what odors were present during the scene he is recalling. Clear "touch" as anything he was actually touching at the time with the sensation of touch including pressure. Clear "colour" as the actual colour contained in the scene called for. Clear "tone" as the quality of the sound present when the scene occurred. Clear "external motion" as the motion of other people or objects or of energy. 3. Clear the commands for List 1, clearing each word of the basic question backwards. "What is the definition of the word ____________?" Clear - "Can you recall a time when _____________ ?" "Can you recall another time when ____________ ?" "Can you recall the earliest time when ____________ ?" 4. R- factor to PC "We will clear the additional words to each list question as we go along." 5. To PC - "This is the process." 6. Place the disk over the first question. 7. Clear the first question - "What is the definition of the word _________ ?" Clear "happy" and "were". "You" has already been cleared so needn't be again. In clearing the list questions the words that are repeated need only be cleared the first time they come up. 8. Ask PC - "Can you recall a time when you were happy?" 9. PC answers and Auditor acknowledges. If PC only nods or says "yes"Auditor asks "What was it?", gets the answer and acknowledges PC. 10. Auditor says "Try to see what you saw in the incident." ( Or whatever perceptic you start with. ) 11. PC indicates he has , Auditor acks and then asks - "What did you ‘see' at that time?" 12. PC answers and auditor acks. 13. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall another time when you were happy ?" 14. PC answers and auditor acks and then says - "Try to ‘see' what you saw in the incident." 15. PC indicates that he has, Auditor acks and then asks "What did you ‘see' at that time?" 16. PC answers and Auditor acks. 17. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall the earliest time when you were happy?" 18. PC answers and Auditor acks and then says - "Try to 'see' what you saw in the incident." 19. PC indicates he has, auditor acks and then asks "What did you ‘see' at that time?" 20. PC answers and auditor acks. 21. Auditor moves the disc down to question 2 and rotates the disc one perceptic counter - clockwise. 22. Clear the new words that are in question No.2 - "What is the definition of _______?" (Clear - something, constructing, finished, just, had). 23. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall a time when you had just finished constructing something?" 24. PC answers by telling auditor what it is and auditor acks. 25. Auditor says to PC - "Recall the odors that you smelled in the incident." 26. PC indicates he has, Auditor acks and then asks - "What odors did you smell at that time?" 27. Auditor continues as above handling each list question- by rotating the disc for each new question and asking for an incident, another incident and the earliest incident that he can recall. The questions to direct the PC to re - sense the different perceptions are not all the same exact patter as each must communicate as itself. The questions - would be: SIGHT: "Try to ‘see' what you saw in the incident." "What did you 'see' at that time?" SMELL.: "Recall the odors that you smelled in the incident" "What odors did you smell at that time?" TOUCH: "Recall what you were touching in the incident." "What were you touching at that time?;' COLOR: "Try to perceive the colors in the incident." "What colors did you perceive at that time?" TONE: "Try to contact the tone of the sounds present in the incident." "What tones were present at that time?" EXTERNAL "Try to perceive the external motion in the incident." MOTION: "What external motion did you perceive at that time?" EMOTION: "Try to recall and feel again the emotion you felt in the incident." "What emotion did you feel at that time?" LOUDNESS: "Pay particular attention to the loudness of the sounds in the incident." "What was the loudness of the sounds at that time?" BODY "Pay particular attention to your own body position in the POSITION: incident." "What was your body position at that time?" SOUND: "Pay particular attention to the sounds in the incident." "What sounds were there at that time?" WEIGHT: "Pay attention to the weight of things in the incident." "What was the weight of things at that time?" PERSONAL "Pay attention to your personal motion in the incident." MOTION: "What personal motion was there at that time?" Each list is run to F/N Cog VGIs. You would then go on to the next list. In List 2 each list question has sub-questions which are also asked, such as - "Can you recall an incident which happened a long time ago?" "What year was it?" "What was the month?" "What was the date?" "What was the hour?" You would then direct him to pay particular attention to one of the senses and so on as in the earlier list. All new words must be cleared as you go along, clearing the words of the questions backwards. When starting List 5 give the PC an R-factor: "In answering these questions particular attention should be paid to happier incidents. (See preface to List 5) TR 00-23 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES UNBULLBAITED TR 00-24 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straightwire STEPS: 1. R- factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW Expanded process called ‘ARC SW Triples'. This process has three sets of commands with 4 commands in each set. Each set will be run separately with the commands in that set run alternately, one after the other, over and over." 2. Clear the first set of commands starting with the first command clearing each word going backwards through the command . 3. Run the first set of commands alternately, over and over 1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4, etc. ) to F/N Cog VGIs. End off the series of commands for that flow when F/N Cog VGIs is reached. 4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second set of commands." 5. Clear the commands of Flow 2 in the same way as in Step 2. 6. Run the second Flow in the same way as in Step 3 to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. R-factor "Now we are going to run the third set of commands" 8. Clear the commands of Flow 3 as in Step 2. 9. Run Flow 3 as in Step 3. TR 00-25 HAVINGNESS UNBULLBAITED TR 00-26 HAVINGNESS BULLBAITED Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques PAB 54 STEPS: 1. R- factor "We are going to run the Havingness process for ARC SW." Clear the word "Havingness". "This process has three commands; each is run by itself repetitively." (NOTE: As with the other processes PC is to tell you what he found when he did the command. ) 2. Clear the first command. 3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 4 . R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command." 5. Clear the command of Flow 2. 6. Run Flow 2 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs. 7. R-factor - "Now we are going to run the third command." 8. Clear the command of Flow 3. 9 . Run Flow 3 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs . Mark Ingber Flag Tech Compilations Revised & Reissued as BTB By Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:SW:AL:MH:MI:mh Copyright c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Ed Note: The later 1976 pack has the identical BTB with the name Mark Ingber, which appears in the 1974 pack, removed from the signature] ******** 84. BTB 15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads [Ed. Note: This is the QUAD version from the 1976 pack. The 1974 pack contained the TRIPLES version. This Quad version adds a 4th flow (flow 0, you to yourself) command to processes 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 below but is otherwise identical to the previous Triples version. The triples version was 4 JAN 72RA revised 14 JUL 73, revised & reissued 28 JUN 74 as BTB cancelling HCOB of 4 JAN 72R same title.] B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N 15 NOVEMBER 1976 ISSUE I Remimeo CANCELS BTB 4 JANUARY 1972RB "0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - TRIPLES PART A ARC STRAIGHTWIRE" ( Revisisions in script. ) O-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - QUADS PART A ARC STRAIGHTWIRE This Bulletin gives a checklist of the Expanded Quad Grade Process Commands. It is not all the possible processes for this level. If more are needed to attain full EP for the level, additional processes can be found in LRH Bulletins, Books, Tapes, PABs and other issues. Each process is run to its full End Phenomena of F/N, Cog, VGIs. Any previously run are rehabbed or completed and and missing flows run. A copy of this checklist is placed in the folder of a pc being run on Expanded Grades and the processes checked off with the date each is run to EP. On any of these processes where the pc answers only" yes" or that he did it, find out what it was by asking" What was it?" This keeps in the itsa line from pc to auditor. (Reference HCOB 30 June 62.) This Bulletin does not replace Source data. 1. REMEMBER SOMETHING Ref: Dianetics 55 (page 129 in 1971 Edition) "Remember something." Repetitive to EP. __________ 2. RECALL A TIME Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 16 Feb 59 (refers to HCOB of 16 Feb 59 HGC processes for those trained in engram running or trained in these processes). "Recall a time." Repetitive to EP. __________ 3. COMM RECALL PROCESS Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process. "Recall a communication." Repetitive to EP. __________ 4. THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process. "What would you like to confront?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would another like to confront?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would others like to confront?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would you like to confront in yourself?" Repetitive to EP. __________ 4A. EXHAUSTION Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process. "Recall exhaustion." Repetitive to EP. __________ 5. PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those trained in engram running or trained in these processes. HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference. "What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?" "What part of the future would you be willing to experience?" Run Alternately to EP. __________ 6. FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET Ref: HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes. PAB 143. "Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind" Run the bracket in sequence to EP. 1."Forgetting yourself." __________ 2."Another person forgetting." __________ 3."Forgetting about another." __________ 4."Another forgetting about you." __________ 5."Other people forgetting." __________ 6."Another person forgetting about another person." __________ 7 . CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two HGC allowed processes. HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes. "What would it be all right for another to make forgotten?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?" Repetitive to EP . __________ "What would it be all right for others to make forgotten?" Repetitive to EP . __________ "What would it be alright for you to make forgotten about yourself ?" Repetitive to EP. __________ 8 . DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two HGC allowed processes "What would another permit to have happen again ?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would you permit to have happen again ?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would others permit to have happen again ?" Repetitive to EP. __________ "What would you permit to have happen to yourself again ?" Repetitive to EP. __________ 9. KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale "Recall an unconsciousness." to EP __________ "Recall waiting." to EP __________ "Recall a mystery." to EP __________ "Recall sex." to EP __________ "Recall eating" to EP __________ "Recall a symbol." to EP __________ "Recall thinking." to EP __________ "Recall an effort." to EP __________ "Recall an emotion." to EP __________ "Recall looking." to EP __________ "Recall knowing about." to EP __________ "Recall not knowing." to EP __________ "Recall knowing." to EP __________ 10. SELF ANALYSIS LISTS Ref: PAB 46 Book Self Analysis (Run per instructions in book.) List One. to EP __________ List Two. to EP __________ List Three: Time Sense to EP __________ Sight to EP __________ Relative Sizes to EP __________ Sound to EP __________ Olfactory to EP __________ Touch to EP __________ Personal Emotion to EP __________ Organic Sensation to EP __________ Motion Personal to EP __________ Motion External to EP __________ Body Position to EP __________ List Four. to EP __________ List Five. to EP __________ List Six. to EP __________ List Seven. to EP __________ List Eight. to EP __________ List Nine. to EP __________ List Ten. to EP __________ List Eleven. to EP __________ List Twelve. to EP __________ 11. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straight Wire SW Fl. "Recall a time that was really to you." "Recall a time someone was in good communication with you." "Recall a time someone really felt affinity for you." "Recall a time anothor knew he/she understood you." to EP __________ SW. F2. "Recall a time that was really real to another." "Recall a time you were in good communication with someone." "Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone" "Recall a time you knew you understood someone." to EP __________ SW. F3. "Recall a time that was really real for others." "Recall a time another was in communication with others." "Recall a time another really felt affinity for others." "Recall a time another knew he/she understood others." to EP __________ SW. F0. "Recall a time you were really real to yourself." "Recall a time you were in good communication with yourself." "Recall a time you really felt affinity for yourself." "Recall a time you knew you understood yourself." to EP __________ 12. HAVINGNESS Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques PAB 54 SWH F1. "Look around here and find something that is really real to you." to EP __________ SWH F2. "Look around here and find something that would be really real to another." to EP __________ SWH F3. "Look around here and find something that would be really real to others." to EP __________ SWH F0. "Look around here and find something that you could make really real to yourself." to EP __________ Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Revised by FMO 1689 I/C for Tr & Serv Aide Approved by Snr C/S Flag, CS-5 Authorized by AVU and LRH Pers Com for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:KU:DM:JE:JG:PD:AL:MH:lf Copyright c 1973, 1974, 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Ed Note: The previous TRIPLES version mentioned at the begining had W/O (Warrant Officer) Mark Ingber as the author followed by the begining of the signature above up to but not including FMO 1689.] ******** 85. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-31 R2-31: BEINGNESS PROCESSING Exerpted from the Book: Creation of Human Ability The cardinal rule where mental or physical compulsions are concerned follows: WHATEVER THE THETAN IS DOING OBSESSIVELY OR COMPULSIVELY, HAVE HIM DO IT ON A SELF-DETERMINED BASIS. This applies to machines, habits, twitches, etc. There is a gradient scale of exteriorization which could be described as follows: first, the thetan without contact With a universe then a thetan in full contact with a universe then a thetan in contact with part of a universe, who considers the remainder of the universe barred to him then a thetan in a universe without any contact with any part of the universe then a thetan unknowingly in contact with a large part of a universe. The first condition would be a true Static, the last condition is called colloquially in Scientology, ‘buttered all over the universe. As it is with a universe such as the physical universe, so it is with physical bodies. The thetan who has already gone through the cycle on the universe itself may be in contact with a physical body in the same order. At first he would be without association with a physical body then with occasional contact with bodies then with a fixed contact on one body, but exteriorized then interiorized into a body, but easy to exteriorize then in contact with and interiorized into a body, but withdrawn from the various parts of the body and then obsessively ‘buttered all through the body' then obsessively and unknowingly drawn down to some small portion of the body, and so forth. This is the gradient scale which includes inversion and then inversion of the inversion. The auditor will discover preclears are very variable in the matter of exteriorization. Some preclears, even when they have a dark field, exteriorize rather easily. Others, after a great deal of work, are still found to be difficult to exteriorize. The matter of exteriorization is the matter of which level of inversion the preclear is in. One of the more difficult levels to work is so inverted that he thinks that a thetan is running him. In other words, here is a thetan functioning in a body and actually running it through various covert communication lines, who yet believes he is a body to such an extent that he considers himself, or any life around him to be some other being. When discussing the matter of a thetan, this preclear is likely to tell the auditor, ‘I'm over there'. This is about the only signal the auditor gets from such a case which tells him that the preclear is being a body, and considers that he is being run by another thetan. Very often an auditor will "exteriorize" such a person, he thinks, only to have the preclear say, "I'm over there". A thetan who knows he is a thetan is always "here" and never "there". The diagnostic manifestation, however, which the auditor first encounters in any case where he is having difficulty with exteriorization is contained in Beingness. Those on lower levels of inversion are having a great deal of difficulty being anything. Such people are below the level of being a body, therefore it would be far up-scale for this person to be able to be a body with certainty. A person who cannot exteriorize easily must be brought up to the level where he can be a body before he can then be exteriorized from the body. In other words, an auditor exteriorizing anyone has to follow such a scale as Beingness Processing. Oddly enough, Beingness Processing is an excellent exteriorization tool, and I say ‘Oddly enough' because, in one sense, Beingness Processing is an Alter-is-ness process. When a case is extremely inverted it is necessary to get the case up to a level where it can identify itself with something. Beingness is essentially an identification of self with an object. The commands used in Beingness Processing should begin with the environment and the vicinity of the preclear. One has the preclear look around the auditing room and select an object, let us say a chair. The auditor does this by saying ‘Look around the room and discover some object which you don't mind being present'. Remember always, that when an auditor asks a question, that question has to be answered by the preclear. It is the auditor's bad luck if he asks a question which introduces an enormously long communication lag in the preclear. The preclear must still answer the question. At this question, then, ‘Discover something you don't mind being present', it is necessary that the preclear actually locate something, even if a dust mote. The auditor then asks the preclear to ‘Locate something else you don't mind being present'. And when all communication lag is gone from this level of process, the auditor then picks out an object which the preclear was comfortable about and says: ‘Now see this (chair) here', ‘All right, what else wouldn't you mind this (chair) being?' And then, as the preclear answers this, and using this same object, the auditor continues to ask the same question until all communication lag is gone from the question: ‘What else wouldn't you mind this (chair) being?' The auditor then selects other objects in the area and uses the same question on them: ‘What wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?', ‘What else wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?' When the preclear is perfectly willing to have anything in the room be a large number of things, including the walls, the ceiling, and the floor the auditor asks: 'Now what wouldn't you mind your body being?' And whatever the preclear answers, 'And now what else wouldn't you mind your body being?' Finally, when the preclear is able to do all the foregoing in Beingness Processing, the auditor commands him: 'Now let's find something you wouldn't mind being', and, as this is the question for which the auditor has been working, he uses this question for a very long period of time, asking over and over, 'What else wouldn't you mind being?' It will be discovered in working Beingness Processing that the entire mechanism of winning Valences occurs. Here, for instance, is a thetan who is caught in a theta trap. After a while he will consider that the trap itself is surviving, which is to say that the motions of the trap have themselves set the thetan into motion so that he now thinks of himself totally as a trap. (This is how anybody gets to be anything -- by getting set into motion by the vibrations in his vicinity.) At first the thetan is willing to be the trap, but after a while, if asked to be the trap and then asked to be the thetan (and this is not a process), the most terrible apathy will be found to intervene between the two steps. The thetan, while fairly comfortable being the trap, on beginning to recover some of his own identity, will be found to be at a point on the tone scale so low as to contain an unbearable and agonizing apathy. Beingness Processing recovers the various valences which the thetan is trying to avoid. As a practical example in life, we find a housewife who is incapable of keeping house. Although intelligent and able in most things, we find she cannot sweep, make beds, or even shop for the house. We discover that her mother was an excellent housekeeper, an excellent cook, and could shop very well. If this is the case, then we would also discover that the one person in this world our preclear does not want to be is her mother. In other words, by being unable to be her mother, she is also unable to be all those things which her mother could do or be. In other words, the matter of valences is also a matter of packages of abilities, and where an individual is unable to be something which has certain definite abilities, he also cannot achieve those abilities, and this, in itself, is the heart of disability. In running Beingness Processing it will be discovered that the imagination of the preclear revives to a marked extent. This is a process which requires a skilled auditor, a patient auditor, and one who is willing to level every communication lag he encounters by repeating the same question over and over, each time waiting to receive a definite answer. It is not a process which one starts and leaves uncompleted. ******** 86. PAB 8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing P.A.B. No. 56 PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN From L. RON HUBBARD Via Hubbard Communications Office 163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11 _____________________________________ 8 July 1955 AXIOM 51 AND COMMUNICATION PROCESSING Let me give you a small review on communication. Axiom 51 says that MEST cannot change MEST, and we find that postulates and live communication do change MEST. MEST cannot change MEST, therefore a pair of forceps cannot basically change a tooth condition. This is sweeping and I want you to realize how sweeping it actually is. A medical doctor would not be able to alter completely a broken leg. You may say, "That's silly, of course he could. He could come in and snap the bone back into place and the fellow would feel a lot better." No, I'm sorry, a medical doctor cannot over a period of time change a broken leg. Do you know what will happen? Let's look at it from the standpoint of life, now, and we find out that the individual got attention for his broken leg, didn't he? It will emerge as rheumatism some day. In the next life it will emerge as two broken legs! We're going to get a repetition of this because as soon as you attempt to change MEST with MEST in one fashion or another you are going to get persistence, and that is all. Persistence of what? In view of the fact that all conditions are postulated conditions, and that the consideration behind them that they are bad or good is simply again a consideration, if we say persist it doesn't mean that it is either bad or good, it simply means that condition. What condition is it? The condition we are trying to change. And whenever we try to change MEST with MEST we get a persistence of that condition. It will crop up one way or another, and you will see this time after time. Dealing as we are in a very high echelon of live communication, when we try to alter a condition with MEST we get this persistence. Restimulation is the condition persisting in the auditor, as an auditor who goes around altering energy masses gets restimulated. The auditor comes along and says, "Now all I have to do is change this energy mass one way or the other," and he may succeed in doing so as far as he can see for the moment. So he goes off restimulated. That is the condition persisting. It's going to persist, one way or the other. The only motto back of MEST is "PERSIST." But we have this licked. Hence Axiom 51. Postulates and live communication actually can bring about a permanent change and can actually stop a persistence. Now, this process, "What wouldn't you mind ____ communicating with?" "What wouldn't mind you communicating with?" is actually not a low echelon process. A low-echelon preclear, one with no mock-ups and very little reality, one who is not well off, will not be touched by this process. He cannot assimilate the process. Why? Because, to run this process, you have to have the cooperation of the preclear's ability to as-is. You have to have the ability of the preclear to have a cognition and the ability of the preclear to as-is a piece of energy, that is, to make a perfect duplicate of it. Where, then, does that leave this process to be totally functional? It leaves it upstairs, because when you run it downstairs, the individual begins to "chew energy." Just "chewing the energy around" doesn't make it persist, but, with all this chewing, he isn't as-ising anything. All he is doing is moving mass "A" to position "B." Anybody who is doing this gets no cognition out of it at all. He is waiting for that piece of energy to tell him something, and this tells you a great deal about the preclear who couldn't run an engram. He was waiting for the MEST to say something. The preclear who could run engrams could still play a game well enough to make the MEST say over and over again what the MEST had imprinted on it. That is exactly why an engram could run and why we had success in running engrams, and when an engram disappeared that is exactly what happened. It was up there all right, it was up there in lights, but it wasn't saying anything. It was a bunch of sound waves imprinted on a bunch of molecules of one kind or another, and the preclear had to sort of pretend it was saying these things over and over. In other words, he made it talk. Now today an individual gets an engram in front of his face and you just tell him to make it talk. Make it say, if you please, exactly what is in the engram, or make it say anything—it doesn't matter which. As we look over this running of an engram, let us say that we are getting an individual to run birth. What we are doing is to get an energy mass called birth to articulate to an individual, and it would run very handsomely indeed if we had the preclear saying Okay. This is actually a terrifically effective way to run an engram. If we wanted to start today running engrams, we could, full out, and achieve tremendously superior successes because we could certainly run any kind of an engram in the bank. We could dream it up, and the preclear could dream it up, could do anything he wanted to, just to make these energy masses talk. Of course very strange phenomena happen on an occluded case when you have him dream up the fact that he has the concept of an engram in front of him. You just look at him and you say, "Now let's make believe that you have birth in restimulation in front of you." (This would be a roughie, and a weird way to go about it.) "And now let's pick up the engram at the point where the doctor is saying, 'If you will just take this pint of strychnine, mamma, the child will be born much earlier.' " You have him to make this concept say this, and have him say Okay to that. The strange part of it is that you don't have to pay any attention to whether birth shows up or not. I counted the number of births on an individual one time and it was several thousand, believe me, and they all go back to Fac Ones and things like that. So we just have him get the idea that he has birth in front of him and have it articulate. Quite often this totally occluded case will have a complete birth show up and begin to run off. But, he was totally occluded, wasn't he? He couldn't run an engram. We could just buckle right down at that point and actually run that engram with Okays from the preclear, just as it showed up, or we could go on running a synthetic engram. In either case facsimiles would go out of restimulation in the individual. As long as we have communication those energy masses will disintegrate and you will stop the persistence of the condition. So let's look at the optimum way that I know of at this moment—the best way I know of—to separate universes, on which I have had considerable success and to date have had no failures as long as the preclear could at least articulate anything. As long as you can make him do anything at all you can make him do this. You have seen the process already. "Give me some things you could say to your mother." If you wanted to make this very perfect, if he is unable to play a game you don't have to (very often the preclear is unable to play a game), you would say, "Now get the idea mamma is out there saying Okay to all of this." "Now give me something else you could say to your mother." Then you say, "Get the idea mamma is out there and have her say 'Okay.' " "Now give me some things that mamma could say to you." Now you will get a positive blow-apart in a fairly rapid order of the interiorization of the universe. We know very well that people interiorize into a body, into other bodies, into MEST objects, into planets. So, if you were to run this one all the way backward you would take somebody who is obviously seen to be interiorized into earth, and what would you have him do? You would say, "All right now, give me something earth could say to you." If he is really interiorized into earth he'll think up something. Then you have him say Okay. The next thing you know he will get the ball of earth 'way out there somewhere. Maybe it's the first picture he has ever had! You will say, "That's fine. Now give me some more things that earth could say to you." "Now give me some things you could say to earth," and very ordinarily he will come right on up the tone scale. You will never see such perfect behavior of a tone scale as when you use a MEST object. Then we would pick out (if we really were bent on exteriorizing Mr. Doakes and Mr. Doakes was interiorized into the interiorizations) another universe when we knew that we had the first one blown, and we would know that because his physiological condition would very definitely alter. We would go on to the next likely universe. We find this fellow who has been a linotype operator for eight thousand seven hundred and sixty-two months, or something of the sort. We don't have to be specific. We pick a linotype machine, and we say if he got into earth he certainly got there via some sort of apparatus he was controlling, so we say, "All right, what could a linotype machine say to you?" He would think it over for a moment. A very literal-minded fellow would probably say, "It could say 'clank.' " "Okay, have it say clank." "You know, I don't get any sonic on this," he'd say. (I've had this happen.) "Well, just get the idea of its saying clank." "Well, it's going clank, all right." ("Oh no you don't," says the auditor, aside and to himself.) "Have it SAY clank." "Have it SAY clank? A linotype machine can't . . . well, I guess it could. On thinking it over I guess a linotype machine could.... All right, I'll have it say clank." "All right. Now have it say something else." He does, and we blow him out of the universe of the linotype machine. Now let's pick the wife he hates worst, or something like that. What could she say? etc. Admittedly this is not a short process, but it keeps going faster and faster. Next we would pull him out of papa and mamma, and maybe grandma and grandpa, and so on. We are doing one of these schoolbook, by the table, separations. Then we say, "Now give me something your body could say to you." "My body say something to me?" And away we would go, and we would blow him out of his head. It will work with almost that mechanical ease. The question is, how many hours of auditing would it take to bring somebody who is totally interiorized into a planet out through these various stages and finally out of his head? As far as I'm concerned it is the minimum number of hours he could be audited for maximum result. We could do a tremendous number of things for him. We could do a momentary patch-up on a lot of things, we could do this and we could do that, but if we were going straight toward the goal of making this individual into the highest level of condition that we could make him into, we would follow a process just about like this. It would be slow, and it would be arduous, but we would get better, and better, and better. He would finally get to a point where he could feel these things blow off and blow out on him. I went so far one time as to try to exteriorize a fellow from his engram bank. I think I exteriorized a lot of thetans from that bank, but I never got the fellow out of it entirely because I didn't have the time. His track finally stretched out in all directions and he could view it clearly, and then he was terribly interested and wanted to run and have to do with each individual engram and there were about seventy-six trillion years worth of them. Then there was the whole GE line. So I abandoned that attempt. He felt wonderful, though, and went around telling everybody he was cleared. Compared to his earlier state he sure was. He was cleared easily from eight or nine heavy engrams in about eight or nine hours' auditing. The articulation of the actual communication would be something you would do on an individual who is having the vaguest difficulty playing a game, who couldn't as-is birth at a glance. And this is the conclusion I have reached rather arduously over these past weeks on this. I give you data when I have it. Axiom 51 is right. It says you can't change MEST with MEST, but postulates and live communication can change it. But realization on the part of a preclear with no cognition is not possible. So if he can't realize, that means he can't as-is, so if he can't as-is, there he is. But I have seen preclears pass right on up the line from cognition zero to almost instantaneous cognition. In the Air Force they have ceiling zero. We have cognition zero, but it's the same thing—total fog. It is immensely safe for an auditor to change by communication. There is no restimulation involved. (the following is handwritten) Text: R-39 Conceiving Something Interesting. Interest is the keynote of attachment. ********