A Freezone Bible Supporter Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s being posted in 11 parts. Contents below following the FZ Bible mission statement. Much Love, Tech Lover ************************************************** FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** ******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ******** Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976, Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this] Dark blue soft cardboard cover 8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US. This is complete including book excerpts but does not include the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the level (it was posted to the internet last year). This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but we are working on those and will post them eventually. Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent "reissued as BTB" designation. Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating where they are to be used. A common distribution is "remimeo" which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines. Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central Orgs Continental". Others such as "D of T" (director of training) refer to posts in the Scientology organization. ******** CONTENTS: part 1 01. BPL 26 JAN 72R SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET 02. HCOPL 7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working 03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades 04. HCOB 11 JUN 64 New Student Data 05. HCOB 25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study 06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors 07. BPL 17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions 08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing part 2 09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior 10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology 11. HCOB 27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality 12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech 13. HCOPL 8 JUN 70 Student Auditing 14. BPL 25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades 15. HCOB 25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full 16. BTB 20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills 17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code part 3 18. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets 19. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form 20. BTB 6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form 21. BTB 20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report 22. BTB 6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report 23. HCOPL 8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form 24. BTB 5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary 25. BTB 24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet 26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms 27. HCOB 16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized part 4 28. HCOB 24 OCT 71 False TA 29. HCOB 24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 30. HCOB 15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2 31. HCOB 18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3 32. HCOB 29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist 33. HCOB 23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA 34. HCOB 21 OCT 68 Floating Needle 35. HCOB 11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC 36. HCOB 21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle 37. HCOB 20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena 38. HCOB 8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N 39. HCOB 21 MAR 74 End Phenomena 40. HCOB 14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything 41. HCOB 14 OCT 68 Meter Position 42. BTB 14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams" 43. HCOB 18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors 44. BTB 16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills 45. HCOB 11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check 46. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering 47. HCOB 10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching part 5 48. HCOB 7 APR 64 Q And A 49. HCOB 3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption 50. HCOB 5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa 51. HCOB 7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs 52. HCOB 17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles 53. BTB 4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears 54. BTB 17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors 55. HCOB 29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels 56. BTB 26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators 57. HCOPL 4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech 58. HCOB 14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands 59. BTB 2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands 60. BTB 18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session 61. HCOB 12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds 62. HCOB 23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights 63. HCOB 6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing part 6 64. HCOB 30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle 65. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing 66. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines 67. HCOB 23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle 68. HCOB 23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing part 7 69. HCOB 12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement 70. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand 71. HCOB 23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements 72. HCOPL 1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives 73. HCOB 29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes 74. HCOB 17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions 75. BOOK Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes part 8 76. HCOB 16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference part 9 77. HCOB 20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process 78. HCOB 16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running 79. HCOB 8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes 80. HCOB 9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two 81. HCOB 20 APR 60 Processes 82. HCOB 27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire 83. BTB 9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills 84. BTB 15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads 85. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-31 86. PAB 8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing part 10 87. PAB 18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear 88. HCOB 17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions 89. HCOB 4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process 90. HCOB 2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command 91. HCOB 25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit 92. HCOB 21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes 93. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-60 94. HCOB 13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale 95. HCOB 7 MAY 59 New Process Theory 96. BOOK Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5 97. HCOB 11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes 98. HCOB 26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded part 11 99. BTB 9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills 100. BTB 15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads ******** 01. BPL 26 JAN 72R SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R 26 JANUARY 1972R ISSUE IV REVISED AND REISSUED 11 OCTOBER 1974 AS BPL CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JANUARY 1972 ISSUE IV SAME TITLE SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET ( HRS ) Hubbard Recognised Scientologist Remimeo Scn Orgs Academies Level 0 Students THIS COURSE CONTAINS KNOWLEDGE VITAL TO SUCCESSFUL LIVING. PREREQUISITE: (1) Word Clearing Method 1 with all words taken to FN. (2) Applied Scholastics Basic Study Manual ( Unless the student has already done a non- superliterate Student Hat or PRD & M1 with each word fully cleared to FN.) ORGANIZATION:_____________________________ STUDENT'S NAME:__________________________ POST:___________________ DATE STARTED:____________________ DATE COMPLETED:______________ This checksheet contains the vital survival knowledge of Scientology Sub-Zero and Zero Level technology. It covers the technology dealing with "memory" and "communication". REQUIREMENTS: Full Study Tech is to be used throughout this course. Standard classroom Word Clearing methods are required. The course is done fast flow per HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Issue II Fast Flow Training Reinstated. CERTIFICATE: Completion of this checksheet entitles you to a "Provisional Hubbard Recognized Scientologist Certificate". A Provisional Certificate is only valid for one year at which time it must be validated. When you have completed through to Class IV training you should Intern in this Organization under the professional guidance of our Technical Experts. When you can then apply the processes of the grade flublessly you will be awarded your full permanent Hubbard Recognised Scientologist Certificate. For Classification a minimum of completing one person on the Expanded Grade is required. This is best done on a 3 way Co-Audit where student A audit student B who audits student C who audits student A. Study the data in checksheet order. Do not go past a word you do not understand. Use a dictionary and for Scientology (R) terms, use a Scientology dictionary and refer to the Symbols and Definitions list (HCOB 23 Aug 65 - Abbreviations and Symbols of Dianetics (R) and Scientology). * = 100% knowledge of and understanding and ability to apply. Not starred = read and listened to the data and understanding of. A demonstration of any of the materials may be requested to give you full understanding of them. The checksheet is one time through materials and practical. WORD CLEARING METHOD NO. 1 TO END PHENOMENA HAS BEEN DONE, WITH ALL WORDS TAKEN TO FN. ________________ A. ORIENTATION SECTION * HCO PL 15 Jun 70 Keeping Scientology working ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 17 Jun 70 Technical Degrades ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 11 Jun 64 New Student Data ____ ____ ___ HCOB 25 Jun 71 The Three Barriers to Study ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 31 May 68 Auditors ____ ____ ___ HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Fast Flow Training Re- instated ____ ____ ___ B. POINT SYSTEM BPL 17 May 71 RA II Rev. 10 Jun 74 Study Points & Conditions ____ ____ ___ C. GENERAL COURSE DATA * HCO PL 27 May 65 Processing ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 15 Dec 65 Student's Guide to Acceptable Behaviour ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 14 Feb 65 Safeguarding Technology Reissued 7 Jun 67 ____ ____ ___ HCO PL 27 Sep 66 The Anti- Social Personality ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 22 Nov 67 Out Tech ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 8 Jun 70 Student Auditing ____ ____ ___ D. BOOKS ( to be read by end of course ) Dianetics 55 ____ ____ ___ Self Analysis ____ ____ ___ Axioms & Logics ( Axioms Section ) ____ ____ ___ E. CHARTS BPL 25 Jun 70R Classification & Gradation Chart Level 0 Section ____ ____ ___ HCOB 25 Sep 71R Tone Scale in Full Rev. 4 April 74 ____ ____ ___ DRILL : REF: BTB 20 July 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 1 Basic Drills ED 3 Observing the Obvious Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 4 Observing the Obvious Bullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 5 Learning the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 6 Learning the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 7 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 8 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___ F. CODES * HCO PL 14 Oct 68 Auditors Code AD18 ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 2 Nov 68 Auditors Code AD18 Additions ____ ____ ___ CLAY DEMO : Each point of the Auditors Code. ____ ____ ___ G. AUDITOR ADMIN SECTION BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin series No. 14 The Worksheets ____ ____ ___ BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 13 Auditors Report Form ____ ____ ___ BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 12 Summary Report Form ____ ____ ___ BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 11 Exam Report ____ ____ ___ BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 7 Folder Summary ____ ____ ___ BTB 24 Apr 69R PC Assessment Sheet Rev. 8 Sept 74 ____ ____ ___ BPL 23 Apr 68 Parent/Guardian Consent Form ____ ____ ___ DRILL : Make up a " Dummy " PC Folder with all the proper forms and worksheets filled out and in correct order in the folder ____ ____ ___ DO IT : Check your PC's folder to see if the folder summary is up to date and accurate ; if it is not, then bring it up to date accurately ____ ____ ___ H. TRs HCOB 16 Aug 71 Training Drills Modernised ____ ____ ___ CLAY DEMO: Axiom 28 ____ ____ ___ Listen to an LRH Demo tape of an Auditing Session before and while drilling each TR. Listen specifically for the aspects of TR 0 ( presence ), TR 1, TR 2, TR 3 and TR 4 for each Tr as you get to it. * OT TR 0 ____ ____ ____ * TR 0 ____ ____ ____ * TR 0 BB ____ ____ ____ * TR 1 ____ ____ ____ * TR 2 ____ ____ ____ * TR 3 ____ ____ ____ * TR 4 ____ ____ ____ I. FALSE__TA * HCOB 24 Oct 71 False TA ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition 1 ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2 ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 18 Feb 72R False TA Addition 3 ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 29 Feb 72R False TA Checklist Rev. 23 Nov 73 ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands make False TA ____ ____ ___ DRILL : Identifying and handling False TA. ____ ____ ___ J . FN_DATA * HCOB 21 Oct 68 Floating Needle ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 11 Feb 66 Free needles & how to get them on a PC ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 21 Sep 66 ARC Break Needle ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 20 Feb 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 8 Oct 70 Persistent FN ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 21 Mar 74 End Phenomena ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 14 Mar 71 FN Everything ____ ____ ___ CLAY DEMO : A full EP showing PC's Bank etc. ____ ____ ___ K. METER_DATA * The Book "Introducing the E- Meter" ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 14 Oct 68 " You must never never . . ." ____ ____ ___ HCOB 11 May 69 Meter Trim Check ____ ____ ___ BTB 14 Jan 63 Rings causing Rockslams ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 18 Mar 74 E- Meter Sensitivity Errors ____ ____ ___ DRILL : BTB 16 Jun 71 Advanced E - Meter Drills Trim Check Drill ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 11 May 69R Meter Trim Check Rev. 8 Jul 78 ____ ____ ___ L. METER_DRILLS HCOB 23 May 71 IX Metering ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 10 Dec 65 E - Meter Coaching ____ ____ ___ * 1. ____ ____ ___ * 10. ____ ____ ___ * 19. ____ ____ ___ * 2. ____ ____ ___ * 11. ____ ____ ___ * 20. ____ ____ ___ * 3. ____ ____ ___ * 12. ____ ____ ___ * 21. ____ ____ ___ * 4. ____ ____ ___ * 13. ____ ____ ___ * 5. ____ ____ ___ * 14. ____ ____ ___ * 6. ____ ____ ___ * 15. ____ ____ ___ * 7. ____ ____ ___ * 16. ____ ____ ___ * 8. ____ ____ ___ * 17. ____ ____ ___ * 9. ____ ____ ___ * 18. ____ ____ ___ M. AUDITOR MUST NOTS * HCOB 7 Apr 64 All Levels Q & A ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 3 Aug 65 Auditor Goofs - Blowdown Interuptions ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 5 Feb 66 II "Letting the PC Itsa" The Properly Trained Auditor ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 7 May 69 5 GAEs ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 17 May 69 TRs & Dirty Needles ____ ____ ___ BTB 4 July 69 Auditing of OT III Preclears ____ ____ ___ BTB 17 July 69 Flagrant Auditing Errors ____ ____ ___ * CLAY DEMO : (a) The 5 GAEs. ____ ____ ___ (b) The effect on the PC of Blowdown interuption. ____ ____ ___ (c) Three examples of Q & A. ____ ____ ___ N. INDICATORS * HCOB 29 Jul 64 Good Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___ * BTB 26 Apr 69 Bad Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___ DRILLS: BTB 20 Jul 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 1 Basic Auditing Drills ED 13 Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 14 Bullbaited ____ ____ ___ O. MODEL SESSION & RUDIMENTS * HCO PL 4 Apr 72R Ethics and Study Tech Rev. 7 Apr 72 ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 14 Nov 65 Clearing Commands ____ ____ ___ * BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands Rev. 10 Jun 74 ____ ____ ___ * BTB 18 Nov 68R Model Session ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 15 Aug 69 Flying Ruds ____ ____ ___ * BTB 11 Apr 74 Handling ARC Breaks ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 Aug 71 C/S Series No. 1 Auditors Rights ____ ____ ___ DRILLS: BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 2 Basic Sessions Actions Drills ED 21 Flying Ruds Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___ ED 22 Flying Ruds Bullbaited ____ ____ ___ DO IT : Fly Ruds on another student; turn your PC's folder in to the Academy C/S when done. ____ ____ ___ P. THEORY OF THE COMM CYCLE HCOB 6 Nov 64 Styles of Auditing ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 30 Apr 71 Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 May 71 II The 2 Parts of Auditing ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 May 71 III The Three Important Comm Lines ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 May 71 IV Communication Cycles Within the Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 23 May 71 V The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 12 Jan 59 Tone of voice acknowledgements ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 17 Oct 62 Auditor Failure to Understand ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 7 Apr 65 Premature Acknowledgements ____ ____ ___ * HCO PL 1 Jul 65 Comm Cycle Additives ____ ____ ___ HCOB 29 Sep 65 Cyclical & Non-Cyclical Process Conclusions ____ ____ ___ Q. TAPES * 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part I ____ ____ ___ * 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part II ____ ____ ___ * 25 July 63 Comm Cycles in Auditing ____ ____ ___ * 6 Aug 63 Auditing Comm Cycles ____ ____ ___ * 20 Aug 63 Itsa Line ____ ____ ___ * 21 Aug 63 Itsa Line ( Cont'd ) ____ ____ ___ * 6 Feb 64 The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___ CLAY DEMO : 1. The Auditing Comm Cycle and what happens in the bank. ____ ____ ___ 2. Axiom 28. ( Ref: HCO PL 7 Apr 74 Ethics and Study Tech. ) ____ ____ ___ 3. The purpose of Level 0. ____ ____ ___ 4. The Full End Phenomena of Grade 0 Ability Attained. ____ ____ ___ R. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE PROCESSES NOTE: See HCOB 17 Mar 74 TWC Checksheets. " TWC Using Wrong Questions " before studying, Drilling and using the processes. USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R ARC Straightwire Drills ____ ____ ___ REMEMBER SOMETHING * BOOK: Dianetics 55! Chapter on Six Basic Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-1 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-2 ____ ____ ___ RECALL A TIME * HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-3 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-4 ____ ____ ___ COMM RECALL PROCESS * HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-5 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-6 ____ ____ ___ THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS * HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-7 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-8 ____ ____ ___ EXHAUSTION * HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-9 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-10 ____ ____ ___ PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE * HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for Those Trained in Engram Running ( applicable parts only ) ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-11 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-12 ____ ____ ___ FORGETTING SIX WAY BRACKET * HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes ____ ____ ___ PAB 143 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-13 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-14 ____ ____ ___ CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE * HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-15 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-16 ____ ____ ___ DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE * HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-17 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-18 ____ ____ ___ KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS * HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___ * BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-19 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-20 ____ ____ ___ SELF ANALYSIS BOOK: Self Analysis * and run per instructions in book, Lists 1 - 12 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-21 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-22 ____ ____ ___ ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES * HCOB 27 Sep 68 ARC Straightwire ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-23 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-24 ____ ____ ___ HAVINGNESS BTB 4 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grades Processes - Triples Part A Rev. 28 June 74 ARC Straightwire Havingness ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-25 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-26 ____ ____ ___ S. LEVEL 0 PROCESSES BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R Level 0 Drills ____ ____ ___ R2-31 BEINGNESS PROCESSING * BOOK Creation of Human Ability - R2-31 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-27 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-28 ____ ____ ___ AXIOM 51 COMM PROCESSING * PAB 56 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-29 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-30 ____ ____ ___ PAB 54 COMM PROCESS * PAB 54 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-31 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-32 ____ ____ ___ AN OBVIOUS BASIC PROCESS * HCOB 17 Mar 60 Standardised Sessions ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-33 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-34 ____ ____ ___ AN AFFINITY PROCESS * HCOB 4 May 59 An Affinity Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-35 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-36 ____ ____ ___ IN SEQUENCE * HCOB 2 MAR 61 New Pre-hav Command ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-37 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-38 ____ ____ ___ UNIVERSE PROCESSING * HCOB 25 Sep 59 HAS Co-Audit ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-39 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-40 ____ ____ ___ LOCATIONAL BODY COMM * HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-41 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-42 ____ ____ ___ A CLEARING PROCEDURE * HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-43 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-44 ____ ____ ___ PROCESS S-2 * HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-45 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-46 ____ ____ ___ R2-60 THE HIDDEN COMMUNICATION * BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___ * BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-47 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-48 ____ ____ ___ R2-60 KNOW TO MYSTERY PROCESS * BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-49 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-50 ____ ____ ___ EXPANDED CDEI COMM PROCESS * HCOB 13 Oct 59 DEI Expanded Scale ____ ____ ___ * BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-51 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-52 ____ ____ ___ LOCATIONAL COMM PROCESS * HCOB 7 May 59 New Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-53 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-54 ____ ____ ___ REMEDY OF COMM SCARCITY * BOOK: 8 - 8008 ( six levels of processing ) ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-55 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-56 ____ ____ ___ GRADE ZERO TRIPLE * HCOB 11 Dec 64 Scientology 0 Processes ____ ____ ___ * HCOB 26 Dec 64 Routine 0- A Expanded ____ ____ ___ BTB 5 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grade Processes Triples Part B Grade 0 Triple Processes ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-57 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-58 ____ ____ ___ HAVINGNESS BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes Havingness Process ____ ____ ___ DRILL: TR 00-59 ____ ____ ___ TR 00-60 ____ ____ ___ T. AUDITING SECTION Audit a minimum of one person to Expanded Grade 0 Release ____ ____ ___ STUDENT ATTEST : _________________________ DATE: ____________________ ACADEMY C/S : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________ U. STUDENT COMPLETION I have completed the requirements of this checksheet and I know and can apply this material. STUDENT ATTEST : _______________________ DATE: ____________________ V. SUPERVISOR I have trained this student to the best of my ability and he/she has completed the requirements of this checksheet and knows and can apply the checksheet data. SUPERVISOR : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________ W. STUDENT ATTEST AT C&A I attest: A. I have enroled on the course. B. I have paid for the course. C. I have studied and understand all the materials on the checksheet. D. I have done all the drills on this checksheet. E. I can produce an Expanded Grade 0 Release. STUDENT ATTEST : ________________________ DATE: ___________________ C&A : _______________________________________ X. CERTS AND AWARDS Provisional Class 0 Certificate issued. C&A : _____________________________________ DATE:____________________ Route to Course Admin for filing in the students folder. Training and Services Aide Revised by W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4 and Flag Mission 1234 Reissued as BPL by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorised by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:HH:BW:RS:AL:MH:mh Copyright c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 02. HCOPL 7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1965 REISSUED 15 JUNE 1970 (Corrected per Flag Issue 28.1.73) Remimeo Sthil Students Assn/Org Sec Hat HCO Sec Hat Case Sup Hat Ds of P Hat Ds of T Hat Staff Member Hat Franchise (issued May 1965) Note: Neglect of this Pol Ltr has caused great hardship on staffs, has cost countless millions and made it necessary in 1970 to engage in an all out International effort to restore basic Scientology over the world. Within 5 years after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation had almost destroyed orgs. "Quickie grades" entered in and denied gain to tens of thousands of cases. Therefore actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are HIGH CRIMES resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and EXECUTIVES. It is not "entirely a tech matter" as its neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump. IT IS THE BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it. ALL LEVELS KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check on all personnel and new personnel as taken on. We have some time since passed the point of achieving uniformly workable technology. The only thing now is getting the technology applied. If you can't get the technology applied then you can't deliver what's promised. It's as simple as that. If you can get the technology applied, you can deliver what's promised. The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs is "no results". Trouble spots occur only where there are "no results". Attacks from governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or "bad results". Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its ultimate success is assured if the technology is applied. So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the Case Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff members to get the correct technology applied. Getting the correct technology applied consists of: One: Having the correct technology. Two: Knowing the technology. Three: Knowing it is correct. Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology. Five: Applying the technology. Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied. Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology. Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications. Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology. Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application. One above has been done. Two has been achieved by many. Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct technology in a proper manner and observing that it works that way. Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the world. Five is consistently accomplished daily. Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently. Seven is done by a few but is a weak point. Eight is not worked on hard enough. Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not quite bright. Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity. Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are the only places Scientology can bog down in any area. The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak certainty that it works in Three above can lead to weakness in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. (b) Further, the not-too-bright have a bad point on the button Self-Importance. (c) The lower the IQ, the more the individual is shut off from the fruits of observation. (d) The service facs of people make them defend themselves against anything they confront good or bad and seek to make it wrong. (e) The bank seeks to knock out the good and perpetuate the bad. Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. In all the years I have been engaged in research I have kept my comm lines wide open for research data. I once had the idea that a group could evolve truth. A third of Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea. Willing as I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of suggestions (less than twenty) had long run value and none were major or basic; and when I did accept major or basic suggestions and used them, we went astray and I repented and eventually had to "eat crow". On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands of suggestions and writings which, if accepted and acted upon, would have resulted in the complete destruction of all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So I know what a group of people will do and how insane they will go in accepting unworkable "technology". By actual record the percentages are about twenty to 100,000 that a group of human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good technology. As we could have gotten along without suggestions, then, we had better steel ourselves to continue to do so now that we have made it. This point will, of course, be attacked as "unpopular" "egotistical" and "undemocratic". It very well may be. But it is also a survival point And I don't see that popular measures, self- abnegation and democracy have done anything for Man but push him further into the mud. Currently, popularity endorse degraded novels, self- abnegation has filled the South East Asian jungles with stone idols and corpses, and democracy has given us inflation and income tax. Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if the group had no supported me in many ways I could not have discovered it either. But it remains that in its formative stages it was not discovered by a group, then group efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or successfully alter it in the future. I can only say this now that it is done. There remains, of course, group tabulation or co-ordination of what has been done, which will be valuable-only so long as it does not seek to alter basic principles and successful applications. The contributions that were worth while in this period of forming the technology were help in the form of friendship, of defence, of organization, of dissemination, of application, of advices on results and of finance. These were great contributions and were, and are, appreciated. Many thousands contributed in this way and made us what we are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the broad picture. We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came to rise above the bank. We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-the group left to its own devices would not have evolved Scientology but with wild dramatization of the bank called "new ideas" would have wiped it out. Supporting this is the fact that Man has never before evolved workable mental technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he did evolve-psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock treatment, whips, duress, punishment, etc, ad infinitum. So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever good luck and good sense, and refuse to sink back into it again. See that Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten above are ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped. Relax them, get reasonable about it and we will perish. So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with all suggestions, I have not failed on Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten in areas I could supervise closely. But it's not good enough for just myself and a few others to work at this. Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight. Nine and Ten has been relaxed the whole organizational area has failed. Witness Elizabeth, N.l., Wichita, the early organizations and groups. They crashed only because I no longer did Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed up you saw the obvious "reasons" for failure. But ahead of that they ceased to deliver and that involved them in other reasons. The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank. Thetans without banks have different responses. They only have their banks in common. They agree then only on bank principles. Person to person the bank is identical. So constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad agreement in a human group. An individual must rise above an avid craving for agreement from a humanoid group to get anything decent done. The bank-agreement has been what has made Earth a Hell-and if you were looking for Hell and found Earth, it would certainly serve. War, famine, agony and disease has been the lot of Man. Right now the great governments of Earth have developed the means of frying every Man, Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank. That is the result of Collective Thought Agreement. The decent, pleasant things on this planet come from individual actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group Idea. For that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked by "public opinion" media. Yet there is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves. Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the bank and then, as a group of freed beings, achieve freedom and reason. It is only the aberrated group, the mob, that is destructive. When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you are working for the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely, surely (a) introduce incorrect technology and swear by it, (b) apply technology as incorrectly as possible, (c) open the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage incorrect application. It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual nothing. It's the Bank that says we must fail. So just don't play that tune. Do Seven. Eight, Nine and Ten and you will knock out of your road all the future thorns. Here's an actual example in which a senior executive had to interfere because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told Instructor A to have Auditor B run Process X on Preclear C. Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that "It didn't work." Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't really believe in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor A told the Case Supervisor "Process X didn't work on Preclear C." Now this strikes directly at each of One to Six above in Preclear C, Auditor B, Instructor A and the Case Supervisor. It opens the door to the introduction of "new technology" and to failure. What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor B's throat, that's all that happened. This is what he should have done: Grabbed the Auditor's report and looked it over, When a higher executive on this case did so she found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that. Process X increased Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for the session but that near session end Auditor B Qed and Aed with a cognition and abandoned Process X while it still gave high TA and went off running one of Auditor B's own manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear C. Auditor B's IQ on examination turned out to be about 75. Instructor A was found to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate anyone, even a lunatic. The Case Supervisor was found to be "too busy with admin to have any time for actual cases". All right, there's an all too typical example. The Instructor should have done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. This would have begun this way. Auditor B: "That process X didn't work." Instructor A: "What exactly did you do wrong?" Instant attack. "Where's your auditor's report for the session? Good. Look here, you were getting a lot of TA when you stopped Process X. What did you do?" Then the Pc wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these would have retained certainty. In a year, I had four instances in one small group where the correct process recommended was reported not to have worked. But on review found that each one had (a) increased the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had been falsely reported as unworkable. Also, despite this abuse, in each of these four cases the recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they were reported as not having worked! Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the more deadly as every time instruction in correct technology is flubbed, then the resulting error, uncorrected in the auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that auditor audits thereafter. So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more important in a course than in supervision of cases. Here's an example: A rave recommendation is given a graduating student "because he gets more TA on pcs than any other student on the course!" Figures of 435 TA divisions a session are reported. "Of course his model session is poor but it's just knack he has" is also included in the recommendation. A careful review is undertake because nobody at levels O to IV is going to get that much TA on pcs. It is found that this student was never taught to read an E-Meter dial! And no instructor observed his handling of a meter and it was not discovered that he "overcompensated" nervously swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond where it needed to go to place the needle at "set". So everyone was about to throw away standard processes and model session because this one student "got such remarkable TA". They only read the reports and listened to the brags and never looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making slightly less than average gain, impeded by a rough model session and misworded processes. Thus, what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was hidden under a lot of departures and errors. I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy course and running a lot of off-beat whole track on other students after course hours. The academy students were in a state of electrification on all these new experiences and weren't quickly brought under control and the student himself never was given the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten so they stuck. Subsequently, this student prevented another squirrel from being straightened out and his wife died of cancer resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at that moment could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the life of a girl. But no, students had a right to do whatever they pleased. Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering Scientology) only comes about from non-comprehension. Usually the non-comprehension is not of Scientology but some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid practice which in its turn was not understood. When people can't get results from what they think is standard practice, they can be counted upon to squirrel to some degree. The most trouble in the past two years came from orgs where an executive in each could not assimilate straight Scientology under instruction in Scientology they were unable to define terms or demonstrate examples of principles. And the orgs where they were got into plenty of trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened out easily because neither one of these people could or would duplicate instructions. hence, a debacle resulted in two places, directly traced to failures of instruction earlier. So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and his Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be merciless in getting Four, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten into effective action. That one student, dumb and impossible though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some day be the cause of untold upset because nobody was interested enough to make sure Scientology got home to him. With what we know now, there is no student we enrol who cannot be properly trained. As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress and should turn the sluggards inside out personally. No system will do it, only you or me with our sleeve rolled up can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only do it on an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's slow = something is awful wrong. Take fast action to correct it. Don't wait until next week. By then he's got other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with their good sense appealed to and wisdom shining graduate them in such a state of shock they'll have nightmares if they contemplate squirreling. Then experience will gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better than to chase butterflies when they should be auditing. When somebody enrols, consider he or she has joined up for the duration of the universe- never permit an "open-minded" approach. If they're going to quit let then quit fast. If they enroled, they're aboard, and if they're aboard, they're here on the same terms as the rest of us- win or die in the attempt. Never let them be half-minded about being Scientologists. The finest organizations in history have been tough dedicated organizations. Not one namby-pamby bunch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made anything. It's a tough universe. The social veneer makes it seem mild. But only the tigers survive-and even they have a hard time. We'll survive because we are tough and are dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes more and more tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are afraid to offend, scared to enforce, we don't make students into good Scientologists and that let's everybody down. When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that wandering doubt in he eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and she'll win and we'll all win. Humour her and we all die a little. The proper instruction attitude is, "You're here so you're a Scientologist Now we're going to make you into an expert auditor no matter what happens. We'd rather have you dead that incapable." Fitting that into the economics of the situation and lack of adequate time and you see the cross we have to bear. But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the more economics and time we will have to do our job. And the only things which can prevent us from getting that big fast are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in mind and we'll be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be less and less. Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us grow less. So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or the High Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and practise our technology. An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge with ferocity instances of "unworkability". They must uncover what did happen, what was run and what was done or not done. If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all by making sure of all the rest. We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't cute or something to do for lack of something better. The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman and Child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless trillions of years depends on what you do here and now with and in Scientology. This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting out of the trap now, we may never again have another chance. Remember, this is a our first chance to do so in all the endless trillions of years of the past. Don't muff it now because it seems unpleasant or unsocial to do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Do them and we'll win. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jw.rr.nt.rd Copyright c 1965, 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970 Remimeo Applies to all SHs and Academies Franchises URGENT AND IMPORTANT TECHNICAL DEGRADES (This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every study pack as the first items and must be listed on checksheets. ) Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without qualifying statements. Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry "A. Background Material - This section is included as an historical background, but has much interest and value to the student. Most of the processes are no longer used, having been replaced by more modern technology. The student is only required to read this material and ensure he leaves no misunderstood." This heading covers such vital things as TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood. These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use. Such actions as this gave us "Quickie Grades", ARC Broke the field and downgraded the Academy and SH Courses. A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any person found guilty, will be activated in the case of anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES. 1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and Scientology so as to lose the full theory, processes and effectiveness of the subjects. 2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labelling any material "background" or "not used now" or "old" or any similar action which will result in the student not knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being trained. 3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any course not authorized by myself and the SO Organizing Bureau Flag. 4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use meanwhile any such comments as "historical", "background", "not used", "old", etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS. 5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation. 6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV. 7. Failing to use all processes for a level. 8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as "I put in Grade zero in 3 minutes." Etc. 9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial or laborsaving considerations. 10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or shorten its materials or its application. REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The pressure exerted to speed up student completions and auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not delivering. The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by using 2 way comm and applying the study materials to students. The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make each level fully before going on to the next and repairing them when they do not. The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting materials and actions. Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and Scientology is the answer to any recovery. The product of an org is well taught students and thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright c 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 04. HCOB 11 JUN 64 New Student Data HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 JUNE 1964 Sthil Students NEW STUDENTS DATA STAR RATED FOR NEW STUDENTS Tape Passes On those live lectures you hear, when you take the Friday tape examination and keep your exam paper when it is handed back, and present it to Theory as evidence, any live lecture you have so heard is credited on your check sheet by Theory where the lecture appears on the check sheet. Not all the lectures I give appear later on check sheets but many do and you should get credit for those you have heard. If you have a Friday exam paper on any lecture you have heard live and the grade is above 90% for star rated and above 75% for a 75, any grade for a zero rate, if the lecture appears as a tape on your check sheets it will be marked off as passed and initialled by a Theory Instructor. Auditing Assignments In auditing before the Level VI Co-audit, it is customary to split up teams that will eventually co-audit to OT. The reasons for this are 1. Auditing skill tends to become adapted to one pc and deteriorate. This does not make a good pro, it makes only a co- auditor. I'm making you into a pro, not a co auditor regardless of classification status. I can't do that by giving you just the pc you are already educated to run. You'd be a one pc auditor. 2. Mutual withholds develop in teams and restrain auditing results. 3. Your auditing skill tends to look better or worse than it is. We don't even wholly guarantee you and your co-auditor that you will co-audit in the Level Vl Co-audit for one team member may be Case type A and the other B. A Case type A can run through anything. A Case type B stops at a comma. Thus one gets too far out of pace with the other and it's just too hard on one member of the team who would be, of course, the Type B and already in trouble. It would be selfish indeed of a Type A to force a Type B to run GPMs far beyond where he or she has had them run. We will try to put the team together in this Level VI Co-audit and mostly do but this AB factor is a technical one and we can't do anything about it short of good auditing. Student Rules A lot of students come a cropper on the rules and try to carry on without concurrence. You are only here for a few months. In your hands is your next multi-trillion years. The rules are there to get you through. Breaking them, in my opinion, is too pricey. Rapidity of Progress A few new students arrive here in a high state of "know it all, just want a few new gimmicks". Students who have this state of mind just don't learn or progress. And they really get stuck in. We're not doing it to them. They are trying to learn over the top of their own postulate that they already know it (when they don't) and so get into a ridge. They're not stuck in the course. They're stuck in this conflict. In the first place, no new student at Saint Hill has ever been known to give a standard session on arrival, despite all the data being available. But they don't know enough about auditing to know whether they're doing well or not, much less know how to audit. Factually they usually look pretty pitiful. There they are making Gross Auditing Errors in an avalanche, missing comm cycles, feet in the pc's face with their meter upside down, telling the Class Vl auditor who is his Instructor "I know all about it. We had a course in Slobovia much better than this one. The pcs audited the auditor and it . . . ." Well you can't blame the instructor if he seems to be having a hard time to keep from laughing in the new student's face. It's only their courtesy that keeps them from reaching over and connecting the unconnected cans this new genius has failed to plug into the meter as a fitting touche. Some auditors trained elsewhere with great ARC but precious little "do it", don't have enough training to know they aren't trained. And it's always the very worst trained auditors who how; the loudest about how they don't need to know. The majority relaxedly study and improve their skill, get results and there it is. I myself periodically study auditing and put a polish on my own skill. I don't have to say "I don't know", but I'm not so arrogant as to believe I'm above knowing how to do things. So if every year or two I can study how to audit without going into a long rigmarole about how I'm above all that, I can reasonably expect others to have a sane view of their own skill too. Any skill can be improved—one can know more about an subject—unless one has already decided he or she already knows all about it. The successful progress of a student is inversely proportional to the student preconception of knowing it already. An arrogant assumption of total knowing without inspection is the surest way to make no progress. One does or does not know the data before him. That's elementary. Why should it become involved with emotionalism? The fast student is not concerned with necessities to maintain status by asserting how much he or she already knows. The fast student is only interested in knowing what he does not know, studying it and then knowing that he knows it. The slow student is so busy putting on that he knows that he never finds out he doesn't in fact know. To do this before a lot of experts such as Saint Hill Instructors seems pretty pointless. Results today are by the text book. Lack of results are always attended by departures. One can or cannot get results with auditing. This means that one is or is not doing a text book job. In our case the text book has 14 years of hard won experience behind it. So text book auditing gets the best results. It's that simple. The statement "I know all about Scientology but I don't get very good results" is a pretty silly statement today. It's saying in fact "I pretend to more than I know and the flubs show up in my results". Well, that's getting right down to the reasons for slow progress and calling a spade a spade, but it's awful true. It's really the only reason back of slow progress on course. The speed with which you complete your course and get to OT is entirely regulated by the speed with which you discover there's something here to learn. Most students handle this very early. I'm sure you will. I give you my good wishes for a fast progress. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.rd Copyright c 1964 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 05. HCOB 25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 JUNE 1971 R REVISED 25 NOVEMBER 1974 Remimeo Tech & Qual All Students Supervisors Word Clearing Series 3R Supervisor's Course Cramming Word Clearers BARRIERS TO STUDY There are three different sets of physiological and mental reactions that come from 3 different aspects of study. They are three different sets of symptoms. ( 1 ) Education in the absence of the mass in which the technology will be involved is very hard on the student. It actually makes him feel squashed. Makes him feel bent, sort of spinny, sort of dead, bored, exasperated. If he is studying the doingness of something in which the mass is absent this will be the result. Photographs help and motion pictures would do pretty good as they are a sort of promise or hope of the mass but the printed page and the spoken word are not a substitute for a tractor if he's studying about tractors. You have to understand this data in its purity—and that is that educating a person in a mass that they don't have and which isn't available produces physiological reactions. That is what I am trying to teach you. It's just a fact. You're trying to teach this fellow all about tractors and you're not giving him any tractors—well he's going to wind up with a face that feels squashed, with headaches and with his stomach feeling funny. He's going to feel dizzy from time to time and very often his eyes are going to hurt. It's a physiological datum that has to do with processing and the field of the mind. You could therefore expect the greatest incidence of suicide or illness in that field of education most devoted to studying absent masses. This one of studying the something without its mass ever being around produces the most distinctly recognizable reactions. If a child felt sick in the field of study and it were traced back to this one, the positive remedy would be to supply the mass—the object or a reasonable substitute— and it would clear it up. (2) There is another series of physiological phenomena that exist which is based on the fact of too steep a study gradient. That's another source of physiological study reaction because of too steep a gradient. It is a sort of a confusion or a reelingness that goes with this one. You've hit too steep a gradient. There was too much of a jump because he didn't understand what he was doing and he jumped to the next thing and that was too steep and he went too fast and he will assign all of his difficulties to this new thing. Now differentiate here—because gradients sounds terribly like the 3rd one of these study hang-ups, definitions—but remember that they are quite distinctly different. Gradients are more pronounced in the field of doingness but they still hang over into the field of understanding. In gradients however it is the actions we are interested in. We have a plotted course of forward motion of actions. We find he was terribly confused on the second action he was supposed to do. We must assume then that he never really got out of the first one. The remedy for this one of too steep a gradient is cutting back. Find out when he was not confused on the gradient, then what new action he undertook to do. Find what action he understood well. Just before he was all confused what did he understand well—and then we find out that he didn't understand it well. It's really at the tail end of what he understood and then he went over the gradient you see. It is most recognizable and most applicable in the field of doingness. That's the gradient barrier and one full set of phenomena accompanies that. (3) There is this third one. An entirely different set of physiological reactions brought about through—a bypassed definition. A bypassed definition gives one a distinctly blank feeling or a washed-out feeling. A not-there feeling and a sort of nervous hysteria will follow in the back of that. The manifestation of "blow" stems from this 3rd aspect of study which is the misunderstood definition or the not comprehended definition, the undefined word. That's the one that produces the blow. The person doesn't necessarily blow on these other two—they are not pronouncedly blow phenomena. They are simply physiological phenomena. This one of the misunderstood definition is so much more important. It's the make-up of human relations, the mind and subjects. It establishes aptitude and lack of aptitude and it's what psychologists have been trying to test for years without recognizing what it was. It's the definitions of words. The misunderstood word. That's all it goes back to and that produces such a vast panorama of mental effects that it itself is the prime factor involved with stupidity and the prime factor involved with many other things. If a person didn't have misunderstoods his talent might or might not be present but his doingness would be present. We can't say that Joe would paint as well as Bill if both were unaberrated in the field of art, but we can say that the inability of Joe to paint compared with the ability of Joe to do the motions of painting is dependent exclusively and only upon definitions—exclusively and only upon definitions. There is some word in the field of art that the person who is inept didn't define or understand and that is followed by an inability to act in the field of the arts. That's very important because it tells you what happens to doingness and that the restoration of doingness depends only upon the restoration of understanding on the misunderstood word—misunderstood definition. This is very fast processing. There is a very swift wide big result obtainable in this. It has a technology which is a very simple technology. It enters in at the lower levels because it has to. This doesn't mean it is unimportant, it means it has to be at the entrance gates of Scientology. It IS a sweepingly fantastic discovery in the field of education and don't neglect it. You can trace back the subject a person is dumb in or any allied subject that got mixed up with it. The psychologist doesn't understand Scientology. He never understood a word in psychology so he doesn't understand Scientology. Well that opens the gate to Education. Although I've given this one of the misunderstood definition last it is the most important one. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rdjh Copyright c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MAY 1968 Issue II (Reissued from Flag Order 808) Remimeo AUDITORS Auditors have since the first session of Scientology been the only individual on this planet, in this Universe capable of freeing man. An Auditor is one who has been trained in the technology of Scientology. An Auditor applies standard technology to pre-clears. At times some will forget or chose to ignore the fact that the Auditor is not just another fellow or a guy who works in Scientology. An Auditor is a highly trained specialist, no matter what level of Auditor. He or she is the only one who can give man the truth, that man knows. An Auditor is to be respected. An Auditor is very important in Clearing this Planet, and this Universe. It's a big job and the Auditor will do it. All Auditors are appreciated. Special designations and insignia are to be developed to distinguish the Auditor from others and signalize his class. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:sb.js Copyright c 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 07. BPL 17 MAY 71RA r. 13 NOV 72 r. 10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R 17 MAY 1971 RA ISSUE II RA REVISED 13 NOVEMBER 1972 REVISED & REISSUED 10 JUNE 1974 AS BPL CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY 1971R ISSUE II SAME TITLE Remimeo All Staff All Students STUDY POINTS AND CONDITIONS (Revises and replaces HCO PL 25 Oct 70 of same title for all checksheets) GOES INTO EFFECT WEEK ENDING 27 JUNE 1974. This revised issue has been designed to even out earlier inequities which gave artificial surges and slumps in students' graphs, and adds points for handling misunderstoods to further reward application of Study Tech. The following point system is the standard point system and is to be used on all Scientology and Dianetics Courses. It cancels all previous point systems. A point system is used so that students may accurately measure their progress through a course. It further provides a quantitative measurement of the production of a course, Academy or Org. The system itself is based on (1) how long a particular study action takes and (2) the type of action it is. Thus the practical is more heavily weighted than the theory, since the purpose of study is application. ALL POINTS MUST BE EARNED. The point system assumes that the student knows and can apply all the data for which he has gotten points. (See HCO PL 26 May 1961 "Quality Counts".) PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON TOUGH EXCELLENT TRS AND METERING AND UNDERSTANDING OF AUDITORS CODE IS REQUIRED. SUPERLITERATES (those who have completed PRD) count their points exactly the same as others. Eg. .an item marked starrate on a checksheet is so counted by the SUPERLITERATE even though not checked out by another. STUDY ACTION ------------------- POINTS 0. Misunderstood word from 1 point per word. materials defined and cleared. or Word defined and cleared 3 points per word. on the PRD 1. Any written material (except O-rate 3 points per page as noted otherwise below). *-rate 5 points per page 2. Tapes O-rate 60 (60 min tape) O-rate 90 (90 min tape) *-rate 75 (60 min tape) *-rate 100 (90 min tape) 3. Clay demonstrations (only 25 credited if done precisely per HCO B 11 Oct 67 "Clay Table Training". Demos must be of good large size and show what's being demonstrated. Points are counted per demo rather than per item on check- sheet where any one item re- quired more than one demo.) 4. Essays 10 5. Study LRH C/Sed Sessions 10 per session 6. TRs (Wherever TRs are done,the following is required): OT TR-O to major stable win 50 per hour plus 50 for passing TR-O to a major stable win nonbullbaited pass. 50 per hour plus 100 for passing TR-O Bullbaited to a major 50 per hour plus stable win 50 for passing Other TRs to 10 unflunked 60 each consecutive actions. Each previous TR to be in. TR 101 25 TR 102 (All done thoroughly. 50 TR 103 All TRs to be in.) 75 TR 104 100 7. E-Meter Drills (except for 15 per drill the following) E-Meter Drills 17, 20, 21, 26 25 per drill Instant Read and Assessment 50 per drill Drills Dating drills 120 per drill 8. Doll Drills - All thoroughly 30 done to a good pass - thoroughly done with TRs in. Bullbaited Drills coached to 75 a flubless pass. 9. Films O-rate same as for tapes *-rate same as for tapes 10. Codes and Axioms- To O-rate 1 per code or Axiom be thoroughly under- *-rate 10 per code or Axiom stood. If clay demos done, the clay demo points apply. 11. Scales - To be O-rate 15 per scale thoroughly understood. *-rate 25 per scale If clay demos done, the clay demo points apply. 12. Charts *-rate 75 O-rate 25 1 column of a chart or *-rate 15 1 level O-rate 10 13. Student Auditing requirements: Flunked Session 0 Not Flunked Session 60 per auditing hr Well Done Session 100 per auditing hr Very Well Done Session 120 per auditing hr 14. Student Folder Error 10 per session Summaries Student PC Program - 100 correct and accepted. Dianetic Flow table 100 15. Student C/S - correct and 15 per C/S accepted. (includes session admin time) 16. Coaching another student same points as student through a drill for that drill Completing a student fully 500 point bonus - on Dianetics or on Ex- provided student panded Grade delivered at a minimum rate of 25 WDAHs in the chair per week in delivering the grade. Coaching another student 0 but failure to complete to a pass 17. Twin Checkouts - not 5 per checkout given coaching whether flunked or passed M3 on another student 3 points for each word found and cleared 18. Official Examinations 200 for exam passed or 100 for attest 19. Specialist Training - 60 points per hour practical, not other- wise covered. ADDITIONAL: A. Hat checkouts, etc. follow study points system for individual items B. Full Org Board drawn 120 up and posted - for any purpose. STUDENT CONDITIONS FULL TIME STUDY = 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. PART TIME STUDY = 2 1/2 hours a day, 7 days a week. CONDITION POINTS POINTS PART TIME FULL TIME POWER 1800 or above 5600 or above AFFLUENCE 1600 - 1799 5000 - 5599 NORMAL 1400 - 1599 4500 - 4999 EMERGENCY 1200 - 1399 4000 - 4499 DANGER 1000 - 1199 3400 - 3999 NON-EXISTENCE Less than 1000 Less than 3400 NOTE: The trend of the student's stat graph is always taken into account per HCO PL 3 October 1970 " Stat Interpretation ". Revised by Training & Services Aide Approved by L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER for the BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:RS:rs Copyright c 1971, 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ******** 08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 MAY 1965 Qual & Tech Divs ALL HATS HCO Div ALL HATS Remimeo Sthil Cl VII Course Students Sthil Staff Ethics Hats PROCESSING Since 1950 we have had an iron bound rule that we didn't leave pcs in trouble just to end a session. For fifteen years we have always continued a session that found the pc in trouble and I myself have audited a pc for nine additional hours, all night long in fact, just to get the pc through. Newer auditors, not trained in the stern school of running engrams, must learn this all over again. It doesn't matter whether the auditor has had a policy on this or not—one would think that common decency would be enough as to leave a pc in the middle of a secondary or an engram and just coolly end the session is pretty cruel. Some do it because they are startled or afraid and "Rabbit" (run away by ending the session). Auditors who end a process or change it when it has turned on a heavy somatic are likewise ignorant. WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF. This is the oldest rule in auditing. Of course people get into secondaries and engrams, go through misemotion and session because things are running out. To end off a process or a session because of the clock is to ignore the real purpose of auditing. The oldest rules we have are (a) GET THE PC THROUGH IT. (b) WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF. (c) THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY THROUGH. These now are expressed as POLICY. A falsified auditor's report is also subject to a Court of Ethics. Any auditor violating this policy letter is liable to an immediate Court of Ethics convened within 24 hours of the offence or as soon as is urgently possible. Auditing at all levels works well when it is done by the book. The purpose of Ethics is to open the way for and get in Tech. Then we can do our job. THERE IS NO MODERN PROCESS THAT WILL NOT WORK WHEN EXACTLY APPLIED. Therefore in the eyes of Ethics all auditing failures are Ethics failures—PTS, Suppressive Persons as pcs, or non-compliance with tech for auditors. And the first offence an auditor can commit is ceasing to audit when he is most needed by his pc. Hence it is the first most important consideration of Ethics to prevent such occurrences. Then we'll make happy pcs, Releases and Clears. L RON HUBBARD LRH:nt:rd Copyright c 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ********