6810C15 Class VIII TAPE 19



AN EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION ANSWERS AND DATA ON

STANDARD TECH



Thank you. Thank you. We have come to the end of the trip.

That sounds very bad in some connotations. Now, you

probably want to know what you got wrong on the

examination. The examination is what processes do you use

on the green form. Well for some reason or another you

characters have forgotten that you can have, and have

issued, and have done green forms.



It is the ordinary Qual action. Now the reason why this was

not hit hard in this course, is that so many green forms

had already been handed out amongst the students that we

did not heavily use green forms.



The best thing you can do with a green form is to itsa,

earlier itsa. That's the best thing you can do with it. And

out of that you could even omit ARCU, CDEI, if the guy

didn't even know what he was doing on that. Just itsa,

earlier itsa. Do you follow?



You can run ARC breaks with this. So, an auditor, you could

train an auditor to use a green form rather easily if he

could recognize an F/N, and knew enough to get an earlier

incident.



But a green form. Apparently your answers on a green form

were very poor. Now it takes a rather skilled auditor to

run listing and nulling, so you tend to minimize that. And

you tend to minimize that, but when environment reads on a

green form, the proper thing, the actual proper thing to

call for if your auditor is skilled, is a remedy B. When

you get a continuous present time overts reading, the best

thing on that is the listing and nulling question, which is

actually of the family of S and D questions. It's one of

those very good questions. Is, "What are you trying to

prevent?" And that is what you use to handle continuous

present time overts.



Now an S and D reads if the person is connected to a

suppressive person or group. And you would do an S and D.

And the S and D, of course, is done on WSU, an assessment

of which S and D is required, and if you start doing too

many S and Ds on a case all it does is invalidate the last

S and D. But you can run one of each kind. There's an F/N

available on W. which is withdraw, there's an F/N available

on stop, there's an F/N available on unmock. So there're

actually three types of S and Ds that can be run. You

wouldn't even bother much to clarify that, but beyond

saving that if a person has been run on a withdraw S and D,

then it should not he run.



I don't know if you could get, if you realize this, but

your recall or remember being blank, is a sort of an S and D 

all by itself on your LX-1. That type of list.



Now there's several of these types of lists, by the way,

just as a notation here. There's several of these types of

lists. They're all handled the same way. Don't all of a

sudden believe that they are something brand new and

wonderful and strange. For instances the Money Course

people are giving all over the place, is just one of these

L-list. It would be handled exactly the same way. Run the

motivator engram, run the overt engram, and the thing would

be in actual fact, just those things associated with money.

And it'd simply be a list of these things associated with

money, gives the person a prepared list, it's already

prepared, it's issued, it's not changed, not added to. And

it's simply assessed, and you do a recall or remember, and

so forth on that. Just filling you in on a little bit of

data here. The lists have not at this moment been prepared.

And as a result, I didn't give them to you.



But your LX-1, your LX-1 is simply the pattern. That is,

the pattern. The other pattern, the LX-1 is the pattern by

which you run a recall, get an F/N, run a motivator chain

of engrams or secondaries, get an F/N. You can get an F/N

from secondaries, and you'd get an F/N from engrams.

overts, secondaries, you can get an F/N for overts,

secondaries. You can get an overt for F/N engrams. And that

is one pattern.



Another pattern of action is you assess this little

prepared list. A very simple little list. And you can do,

for something like auditing or something like that, you can

do the L-1 on the result of this little prepared list, or

you can prep check it.



These are all of a family of actions. They actually can be

addressed to anything. I just saw about a, I don't know.

Must be a twenty page auditing report on a prep check of

what you have been going over, called, you know, they make

a list like, "Auditing, auditors", you know, so and so, so

and so. That little list. And then prep check it. And that

little list, all by its' little lonesome, produced twenty

pages worth of session, on a case that has been a kind of a

no-case gain case, and all that sort of thing. But that's

all by itself, you see? Now actually you can prepcheck

floating needles. You can do all that sort of thing. But

this is all outside the zone of green form. You don't

discover these things on a green form. These are the things

which a case supervisor adds up as necessary on the case,

and he puts the thing together. Now when you send somebody

over for a green form, over to Qual, your ordinary action

would be something on the order of omit lists. You haven't

got any security in your auditing, your lists. And they've

done too damn many lists already. So just omit lists, do

the green form, itsa, earlier itsa. And you'll just be

surprised what these characters can run into on this.



So, you apparently forgot the green form. And that is

Quals' chief weapon. Now one of the things about the green

form is people mustn't send people to Qual to get a

disagreements check, to get a sec check, to get a bop bop

bop bow bow. People cannot dictate what happens in Qual

except the case supervisor. Do you see? So that executives

throughout an organization can send their staff in for

anything they please, as long as it isn't done.



This also follows on into the field of the ARC break

registrar. It's very unfortunate that it is known as the

ARC break registrar, because what they ought to be doing on

those people is a green form. And what they ought to be

using is itsa, earlier itsa. That's all they ought to be

doing on the whole ARC break program, the ARC break

registrar, the ARC break auditor.



That's all they ought to be specializing in. Because it's

very safe. Very safe. And if you omit lists off of it

you've got an unlimited run. It really doesn't matter how

often or how long you go on this sort of thing.



But I didn't issue these green forms to you for the reason

that anybody can do a green form.



It's very simple. I've taught you some very standard

actions. Now remember, when you've been putting in the

Ruds, exactly the same action you use in putting in the

Ruds is what you use in handling a green form. Except it

ceases to be what is just in the rudiments, and it becomes

the whole green form goes that way.



Now, this has, you had another one here. What does setting

up a case mean? And apparently you missed this left, right

and center. And some of you undoubtedly got it, but it was

a common miss. It was question 246. You fly the Ruds or

green form to F/N before starting a major action. And

brother, you better remember that. 'Cause if you missed

that on the examination, man, wow, you're going to have

trouble. We had somebody just a day or two ago in auditing

do the unforgivable thing. The guy had a somatic so they

thought they'd put the full four rundown through. They're

gonna handle a lousy little PT somatic with a full four

rundown. Why that somatic ought to have been handled and

everything ought to have been handled on the case. They guy

was set up to go. Don't you see? And so, setting up a case

is, you fly the Ruds or green form to F/N before starting a

major action, and that, you wouldn't attempt any major

action on a case. Don't attempt a major action on a case

that apparently has something wrong with it. Handle

whatever is wrong with it before you attempt a major action.



And if I can give you that the case'll fly.



You're handling a guy who is dead in his head or stuck here

on earth, or something like this.



The major actions of a case are to fly this thetan. I don't

know. I might even go so far as to have somebody who is

having consistent tonsillitis and lumbosis and bog-woggus,

and that sort of thing, make him get himself straightened out

medically before I'd touch him. Yeah, the case is obviously

going to get audited with all the grades to cure his god

damn tonsillitis.



Now the difference of viewpoint is, is you really shouldn't

give a damn what shape the body is in as long as it does

not deter the PC from flying. So your Ruds, and your little

green forms, and your actions of this character, and how

you set these cases up, you set the case up before you

attempt a major action. And you're going to have terrific

wins. Because the major action is for something else. It's

to fly the guy. Not to handle his ingrown toenails. Do you

see that? So I'm clarifying it here, because it possibly

wasn't clear.



Question number 247, how do you set up a case? There is no

consistency on this. There, some said just Ruds, some

didn't mention F/N. Hardly any mentioned a green form.

Others went into more complex action of setting up a case,

such as running engram chains and that sort of thing. But,

you set up a case with Ruds or green form to F/N, or list

1, or list 4. But you set up the case somehow. See? You

can, you can go into more complex actions. Yes, that's very

true.



You can run engram chains. You can do this, you can do that

and the other thing, see? But where you haven't set up the

case you throw away the major action. And when you've

thrown away the major action you've got no place to go. So

you set up the case. You don't run somebody with a

constant, persistent present time problem on a major action

like grades. Don't say, "Well it'll all be handled when we

do problems." Bunk! Problems are addressed more or less to

the whole track.



I had somebody the other day, had somebody the other day

run on the grades, and all that handled was her present

time problems as a messenger. See, that was a flunk. That's

a throw away of the whole line of grades, because in actual

fact, the present time problem wasn't really straightened

out on the case. You want this person to look at life. See?

We want him to look all around and we want him examine his

track and we want him to fly on this stuff. So this, this

you've got to get. Because it's the very guts of modern

auditing.



Alright, and question 250. Is "Explain the mechanism of

release, and at which point you get an F/N." The F/N occurs

when the PC disconnects from the mass. That's a release.

When he disconnects from the mass, that's a release. Oddly

enough, it translates through to the person that when he,

for instance was in prison, and they let him out, that'll

read as a release too.



Which is perfectly OK. Cause it was a release from the

mass. Do you understand? But it's a release from the mass.

And the comment here on the case, these, not my comments

but the people who corrected the examinations, quite a few

amazingly had this wrong. And for some reason had it

confused with other thetan pictures. And some even said

it's when you create the mass. I wouldn't know how you got

that wrong.



If it's too, the trouble with it is, it's too damn simple.

It's too simple. That's what's wrong.



It's actually almost impossible to complicate the answer.

So I'll give you the answer very bluntly. Here is a mass.

When you take the thetan out of it, it's a release. When

you erase the mass and leave the thetan there, it's an

erasure. And there is no other complexity to it. Pleased

That's all there is. That's all there is. There isn't any

other complexity to it whatsoever.



I'll go over it again. There's a mass. Any old damn mass.

Mental mass, prison, cat fights.



Alright. The mass. Alright. Here's a thetan. He's stuck in

this thing, see? And he's saying, "I'm not happy. I get

yowl all the time. You know? I yowl. I keep seeing these

bars in front of my face. Yap yap yap yap yap. Complain,

complain, complain, complain, complain. Why is he

complaining? 'Cause he's stuck in a mass. He's out of time,

he's in a mass, and so forth. You come along, you audit

him, you go poof! Do you see? This, oddly enough, will drop

out of sight. And he'll say, "Whee!" That's a release.



Alright. Now, we've got another action. And here he is,

stuck in prison. He's really stuck. 199 years to go. And we

come along and we erase this. The engram he's stuck in. The

mass he's stuck in. We get it as-ised. It doesn't

disappear. It's gone. Gone. It ain't never gonna come back

no more. And that's an erasure.



Only two actions. He gets out of the car, or you scrub the

car. That's all there is to it. You try to make anything

else out of it, and boy, you gonna go around in circles.

Sure we know he makes up the mass. Sure, we know all kinds

of complications. Sure, we know that the mechanics of

electricity show that ohms, volts often resist. Yes, we

could probably fix up slide rules that would tell us the

exact density of the release he's stuck on, and I imagine

somewhere up the track if I don't keep my eye on it some

damn fool will do this! But that's all there is to it.



He gets out of the car or you erase the car.



In either way he's rid of the car. But if he just gets out

of the car he's still got a car somewhere.



If you erase the car he isn't ever gonna have any more

trouble with that car, because it's gone.



We don't care that he mocked up the car in the first place,

he usually hasn't found this out. And very often he's so

disowned something he has mocked up that it appears to be

something somebody else mocked up. And sometimes it is

something somebody else mocked up. Who is right there that

moment looking down his throat. But we don't care what the

hell! I don't know why you worry about where the hell the

mass came from at the stage of defining release. Who cares

where the mass came from? It is. And you can take him out

of it, or you can erase it. You got it?



Brother, that's all there is to it. Wow, wow, wow.



Now you could exteriorize and get him out of the body, and

then you can get complexities like that. You can

exteriorize him, and get him out of the body only he took

the mass with him. So he complains that it really wasn't a

release, 'cause he didn't think he was stuck in the body,

he thought he was stuck in some mass. It's what he thinks

he's stuck in. It isn't his idea. He's really stuck in it -

Like, like fly paper. But you can do those two actions and

they're entirely different.



Now, here's another one - "What is the matter, and how do

you handle someone who found 'none' on three?" And I got one 

on you guys. You never checked out on your study materials

at an AO on 3. You never did - You never did, and by god,

from the lesson I've had here, you know what I'm gonna do?

Dey gonna give star rate checkouts before dey ever get 3-

And that's going on right now. Going on right now. That was

telexed to them yesterday. They study it and study it and

study it, and they can call it name, rank, serial number,

everything else. Whether they can confront it or not we

don't give a damn. And then we fly the Ruds, and let them

go at 3. And of course when they fly the Ruds they go F/N,

they say, "It's all gone." We say, "Very good. It's all

gone. That's great. You didn't find any?" "Oh, no, no. I

never had any. I'm peculiar. I'm one of those people whose

feet never stick. I was actually born in the universe as a

free being, and I am still a free being. This stuff

crawling on me is simply a rumor." And at that moment we

will fly a rud, run incident II, capture to pilot, find

some engram incident I's, and run them. And the funny part

of it is, is you know sometimes this happened? It sometimes

has happened that after we've done this once or twice the

guy all of a sudden wakes up. And he says, "Hey, you know?

There's a lot of these, hahaheheeheehoo."



We say, "Here's your study materials and your pack again.

Guess you go back to the old salt mines, boy." You understand?



Now we're not trying to invalidate his 3, we're not trying

to get him to audit 3 forever, or anything like that. But

he ought to be reasonable clear of fleas. So we don't have

to use through the following OT sections flea powder on him

every few minutes. And the reason for OT section failure is

a failure, not to audit 3, but a failure to check out the

materials of 3. The most abysmal ignorance you ever heard

of seems to exist on this subject. I don't know why - Maybe 

a body thetan reads it. (Laughter.)



So you're going to find a lot of these cats, and the thing

to do is to pat them on the back, and say, "Cheers." And

not evaluate for him and tell him it's an unflat 3. Throw

him into session, run an incident II capture to pilot, run

him back, run some incident I's, and then they either don't

have any more or they do. See? It's an open and shut

proposition. If you can't clear it up in a review session

they've got more. If you can clear it up in a review

session, that's it. Do you follow? And they're going to

have to do it all over again at 7 anyhow. It isn't that they

departed. It's that there's other phenomenon of a case at

7, almost as startling as that of 3. And if you make them

go back and audit 3 too often and too many times, and so

on, you'll start running into phenomena of 7. And then the

guy sort of gets plowed in and doesn't know where the hell

he's going or coming, boy. And he can really get chewed in.

But the way you'd straighten it out, is just take the

repair actions which you've been taught on this course.



You could do an assessment of them, and ba ba ba body

thetans and sessions, and invalidations and solo auditing,

and bow-wow, and examiners, and review, and auditors and so

forth. And I don't care, run it on L-1, prepcheck it,

whatever you want to do with it. You could straighten him

out. Do you understand?



If he overruns 3, there's another trick, I think I've told

you that already. You can overrun a body thetan on 3, so

it'll then read as an overrun 3. Well the answer to that is

always "who".



Who overran 3? Who's overrun on 3? And you'll get all of a

sudden, we had one case who had apparently run 3, and in

great thoroughness had overrun and ARC broken every body

thetan he had. Actually it didn't take more than about a

half an hour review session, or something like this, to

clean him up both ways from the middle, and he was getting

more blowing off than you could count. Because that's ail

we were picking up, you know? Overrun, ARC broke, overrun,

ARC broke, overrun, ARC broke, overrun, ARC broke. And it

was running, Overrun, F/N. ARC break, overrun, F/N. F/N. 

Overrun, F/N. He looked like somebody'd left open the gate 

of a menagerie. But the guy really started to fly. So you 

can set 'em up. You can set 'em up. It doesn't matter.



They can also do a gorgeous job of plowing themselves in on

this. But we can pick them out of it. So, so what?



Also, the larger majority of it, when they do study the

study materials, and they do audit, go clear as a bell. You

hit them on the left ear and they ring for half an hour.

And of course, the trick of it all is, is after you've done

the Clearing Course the guy usually goes free of the body

thetans, so he parks them all over in left field. He is

clear. Do you see? But his environment isn't. So therefore

he often goes clear, has a ball, thinks that life is

wonderful. And suddenly falls on his head again and can't

understand it. Actually what he's done is run in some body

thetans.



The reason why you discharge it on 2 is so the body thetans

won't be so charged up they can spin him when they hit 3.

And if the guy's fixed up 2, and discharged the thing a bit

on 2, when he hits 3 he won't spin.



If you were to take somebody who was a wag, right straight

off the street, run Incident 2, not as the capture, but

just run Incident 2, just the volcano, and let him walk

off, you'd probably have a dead man on your hands within

five or six days. And the way we're getting away with it is

fantastic. But let me point out, that it's we're getting

away with it. Because once they start to freewheel through

this stuff, they can't sleep, they can't eat, and they're

finished. The body dies for lack of rest and so on. Because

the incident itself is set up to do just that. So it's

nothing to play with.



Isn't it interesting that we haven't had it happen? Well

it's an attestation of modern auditing and the preparation

of cases. And the way it doesn't happen, is to get the bank

discharged a bit.



Show the guy what to do. And it doesn't happen. It's really

remarkable.



Also, we've already pointed out the by-passed charge. If he

didn't know about Incident 1, and nobody pointed out the

fact that there was an earlier Incident 1, and he ran the

volcano he would spin for sure. But the mere fact that he

knows there's an earlier Incident 1, and I don't know how

it got removed from the materials because there was no

doubt of it in the original material release, Incident 1 is

way earlier. And you point out the fact that Incident 1

exists, and that all by itself tends to discharge 2, so it

can't wrap somebody around a telegraph pole. And that's why

it isn't happening. I'm just telling you the other

phenomena could happen, however.



You don't...  He doesn't study the materials, never reads

the materials, he's never been audited, he's never come up 

through the grades, and some how or another we force him back 

and run a volcano. Just that. Only we erase the volcano, and 

let him freewheel. Well the whole bank freewheels. All thetans 

in coordination do a beautiful freewheel, straight through R-6.



And he'll freewheel for days and days. By freewheel I mean

it's automatic run. It Must starts and it keeps going. Do

you see? Basically that's why the materials are

confidential, so just that won't happen to somebody. That's

why we say the case should be prepared; Well, prepared.



He should be run up through the grades. That's why we say

he takes OT 3 when he's supposed to take OT 3. That's why

the guy, when he runs OT 3, should run the study materials

of OT 3. He should know them, and no casualties will

occur.. It's something on the order of, you take and put a

knife through the right hand tire of a car while it's doing

sixty miles an hour. It'll go off the road. Well, that's a

stupid thing to do, isn't it? That'd be a very stupid thing

to do. Well so you don't do that to somebody.



Now I don't know if you knew or not, that there was any

liability to 3. But there is. That liability to 3. That it

is prematurely run and so on.



Now the material is somewhat self protecting. Because very

often somebody gets a hold of the OT section materials, and

we have had that happen. And they looked at it and said,

"What's this got to do with? It doesn't have anything to do

with me. And so forth. There isn't any picture on it.

There's no realitv on that." And they walk off and leave

it. And they don't even know they got their hands on

anything. In other words, it's so far beyond their reality

that they don't even contact it. Which is quite remarkable.



Additionally, supposing somebody came along to get the

materials, didn't run any of the materials, and then all of

a sudden accidentally ran a piece of 3. There he would go.

But he would have done himself in with his own lies. Well

the materials, to that degree, is self protecting. I

imagine some psychiatrist who got a hold of it would decide

to test it out on some patient. He'd probably go mad far

quicker than the patient.



Alright. But the answer to the question, "What is the

matter", and "How do you handle someone who found none on

3?" He had a severe physical injury and got them all packed

together, and run it like an engram. It's the melazzo,

actually.



The majority of you got this wrong. Some said you check it

and run the grades, and others that you unburden the case

with LX-1 assessments and prepchecks, and so forth. No.

The guy who found none on 3 has been packaged by a severe

injury, and what you do is run the engram of the severe

injury, and then blow some of them off the cluster, and

then you can run some Incident 1's, or you can run an

Incident 2, and then some Incident 1's, do you see? But the

mechanism of the cluster is what you haven't understood.

Supposing you had twenty gum balls, and they all rolled

around independently of each other just great. Now these

twenty gum balls are somewhat loosely heaped up. And

somebody hits them with a sledge hammer.



Now can you tell one gumball from another gumball? No. But

if you run the engram of being hit with a sledge hammer,

then they get separate again. You get the mechanism? And

that's the basic mechanism by which you handle one of these

none on 3's. It's just one of these simple things like

release. See?



Here's a whole bunch of body thetans all piled up around

this bird, and somebody comes along with a baseball bat and

hits the lot. And they go squash. And now they can't tell

the difference between one or another. And each one has a

different viewpoint of being squashed. And so the thing

doesn't as-is, and they're all tangled up, and that usually

puts each one of them in a different position of the back

track in addition to the squash. It's a mess, man! So, you

just run the engram of the squash. They all come apart and

run individually. And that's the melazzo.



And that is what you do with a none on 3. He's had a severe 

injury.



Now it may be a whole chain of injuries before you suddenly

get a release, but the top one was the cluster. Even though

is didn't erase, you at least got the thing that

disconnected it. Do you follow?



Funny part of it is you can do that two or three times. If

you ever ran into a cluster of a person who had been

electric shocked. Violently electric shocked, it's liable

to come off piece meal as a cluster. You know, it isn't a

PC, but some electric shock case, having kicked the bucket

under the gentle ministrations of what they laughingly call

the butchers. Alright, that character goes out as one

piece, don't you see? And he sort of flies around and then

he hits somebody.



That's a cluster. There be a pressure on the body. Now the

preclear won't be a part of this cluster. It'll simply be

hitting him. So the thing you do is you've still got to

find a mutual engram of the cluster. And then the PC may be

very confused, because he's never had that experience. Well

that's right. But it's still just the mutual engram of the

cluster and then you run the Incident 1s out of it, and it

all goes sssssl It's a very easy operation if you know the

mechanics of the thing.



So if you're ever puzzled about this, remember hitting a

pile of gumballs with a sledge hammer, and then figure out

how you would fix that up. And that's all there is to it.



Once more you're making too much out of it! Simple.

Elementary. Alright? Now, the next one is, "What do you

know when you ret a read on overrun on 3?" Well there's

been one incident, number, an Incident 1 overrun on

somebody or something. But it doesn't mean 3's overrun. It

means somebody has been overrun on an engram in 3. Got it?

Alright.



And most of you said to handle it like an overrun. Boy,

you'd go mad trying to handle it as an overrun. Somebody's

got to find what, who, which, has been overrun? Therefore,

it's a very peculiar overrun. Don't you see? If

somebody,...  People who've run the thing verbally, "Go back

to the beginning of the incident," see? They've said this a

half a dozen times. The thing is already erased. The thetan

parks back at the beginning of the incident. But there

ain't anything there! And so he stays there in confusion.

"What am I supposed to do here? What am I supposed to do

here? What am I supposed to do here? What am I supposed to

do here?" You catch him a month or two later, and all you

do is indicate the fact that he's overrun it, and he goes

thump! "What do you know? Sssst!" Gone. See, it's one of

these damn fool foolishnesses, see?



"Everybody knows the mind is so complicated that nobody

could possibly figure any of these things out." Truth of

the matter is, they're so buried under complexity that

they've been very hard to dig up. But once they're dug up,

boy, they look as plain as a dogs' bone on the lawn.



And then you come along and you say, "See that over there?

That's a dogs' bone. It's just been dug up.' And people

say, "Now let's see. Is it the bone of a cow?" It's

irrelevant. It doesn't matter what it's a bone of.



Alright. Here was question 270, "Should you find out what

the TA is up on before you get it down?" No. Mostly said

yes. Should you find out what the TA is up on before you

get it down? Not necessarily. Not necessarily at all. You

can simply ask the guy, "What has been overrun?" It very

ordinarily comes down. Do you follow? I'm afraid that was

one of these trick questions. One of these sneaky

questions. But, if you first try to find out what it was up

on before you did something to get it down, you would very

often miss. This is one of these wild questions.



The TA that starts going up, don't you ever as an auditor

sit there and watch a TA go up. You indicate, ask if

something's been overrun, PC can't find anything, come

down. You start messing around with it at that particular

point and you're liable to be in severe trouble. Right in

the middle of a session. He can't answer the question. He

doesn't know what's been overrun.



That's not been overrun. You shoot at it a couple of times

and it doesn't come down. You had better instruct any

auditor auditing for you to pack it up and ask for a C/S.

Don't go on with the thing going up and don't get in a fire

fight over the PC trying to get it down. Similarly, a low

TA. Don't do that. In the middle of a session all of a

sudden the guy's TA goes low. Don't start bugging him.

Don't start chopping him up about it, because he'll get

frantic. That's why PCs should never be able to see the TA.

Never. He starts getting frantic. You've entered a present

time problem into this thing. And you know very well, by

the mechanics of it, the person who has a present time

problem, he doesn't make any case gain.



Well let's look at it now. The guy knows he's got his TA

high, or he knows he's got his TA low. He now has a present

time problem, right? The weird part of it is, you're not

going to solve it. Your chances of setting the TA down at

that moment are zero. That's how you get into these fire

fights, 'cause the guy's now got a present time problem. If

you're going to ask him anything, "Do you have a present

time problem?" "Yes I have a present time problem. I have a

TA that's high." "Well good. Thank you very much." You'll

watch the TA come down. You see it's idiocy, but if the

guy's TA is starting to rise and you can't immediately go

back and say, "Hey, wait a minute. It goes back to here",

and rehab it right now, pack it up. Don't just sit there

and fool with it.



A TA which inexplicably goes up when it shouldn't be going

up usually forecasts itself a long time before. You'll see

this person's TA acts up. Suddenly. Why? Actually, the

thing I would do on it, is I wouldn't fool around with a TA

that suddenly, inexplicably goes up. The auditor tried to

rehab, say, "Did I bypass an F/N?" So forth, and yip yip,

and so on. "Was something been overrun?" And the TA keeps

going up. Oh brother. Unload, unload. Knock it right off

right there. Pack it up, and say, "Thank you very much."

And send it, send the thing for a C/S.



Or make somebody send it to you for a C/S.



What you normally order, what you normally order that is

the most successful, is seven special cases. Something has

appeared on this case that wasn't here before. And you're

liable to get the most astonishing result out of this. And

once you do that, wham wham wham wham. Now don't, in a

session, try to C/S it at the same time. I've tried to keep

you from doing that. But if you can't immediately spot,

"Hey wait a minute. I by-passed an F/N on you." You should

see it right in front of you. You say, What the hell was

the matter with me? I mean, there it was.



He got an F/N on clearing the command and I thought he was

still F/Ning on the last process.



And obviously he F/Ned on clearing the command and I missed

it. The TA'll go flow, boom.



F/N. See? Nothing to it. But if that doesn't happen, and it

doesn't clear it and so on, then you had better do an

assessment and every other damn thing.



Those are the proper actions for handling high TA or low

TA. But if the guy's TA is going low, and he's getting ARC

break needles with the TA down at 1.5, and all of this sort

of thing, and oh wow, wow wow. You can get into an awful

fire fight with a PC under that one, too.



And the best thing to do if you don't immediately

rehabilitate it, wham wham wham, and it's quite obvious

what this thing was all about, in the first place it isn't

gonna do him a bit of harm running with a low TA, 'cause

it'll come right back up again. Usually a low TA'll come

right back up again. There's case after case around, that

every time you ask them a question the TA goes down to 1.7.

And then as they answer it, it goes back up to 2. So why

get, why get all sweated us about it? But he goes down to

1.5 and has an F/N, well that's for sure an ARC break. So

that you can check that out easily enough. You can check it

out now. But if it's getting difficult to check out, pack

it up. Get another C/S. Get back off of this thing and take

a look at it. And see what's wrong with this case. All of a

sudden, all will meet the eye.



You're busy processing somebody who is so PTS it is

pathetic. The whole behavior of the case is this. You start

tracing back through other ARC breaks the person's had.

It's always an ARC breaK with mother, or it's an ARC break

with something, or it's an ARC break with wuf wuf wuf, and

each time they have this ARC break the TA is sunk. A

person's PTS as hell, this is the time to run an S and D,

something of that sort. He's PTS.



You know that a low TA equals invalidation, high TA equals

overrun. There's nothing more simple than that. Do you

follow? Alright.



Now whether you know it, the thetan starts to spin on

Incident 1. Well he doesn't spin on Incident 1 really in

the first place, but he has run an incident that should be,

what do you know if the thetan starts to spin on Section 3?

And so forth. Or something. He normally has run a 1 on one

thetan, and a 2 on another thetan, so that's he's got a 2

which has been run without its' 1. And it's when you run a

2 without its' 1 that the guy spins. Yet people will do

this. Every now and then they run...  They will run on this

one and 1 on Joe, and 2 on Pete. Now Pete starts to

freewheel. So all you have to ask is, "When did you run the

Incident 2?" Something like that. And, alright, then get

the same thetan down, and run an Incident 1 - And he

unspins, just like that. Magical. Right now. That's all

thatts wrong. Do you follow? Some said not enough food and

rest, and other said the case was overcharged. Both of

which are probably true. But the actual action is, he's

run, usually run an Incident 1 on one thetan, an Incident 2

on another thetan, and you've got an Incident 2 run now,

with the thetan going through the thirty six days, all on a

big freewheel. And maybe a whole cluster started through

it. And the thing to do is to whip it back, and get the 1

run on the guys who are going through 2. And you get the

Incident 1 run, it'll unspin, just like that. There's

nothing to it.



Alright, "Explain the mechanics of LX-1." It's the basic

postulate he made to move off the track. The mechanics of

LX-1 is simply he couldn't stand it anymore, so he decided

he had been wiped out, driven off, over powered,

overwhelmed, whatever the words are of LX-1, and he's moved

off the track. And he's not now in his own valence. And by

running recall you discharge the top of the engram and you

can run the engram out to then, and he will get back in his

own valence. And he can stay in his own valence. As long as

the case is very badly over charged he's not likely to stay

in his own valence.



Some two or three people, by the way, believe implicitly,

for some reason or other, I don't know why, but some two or

three people believe that if you'd run LX-1 you omitted the

valence shifter on the full four rundown. And I don't know

how anybody would figure that out, because the full four

rundown doesn't have anything to do with LX-1. And one case

that had, had the valence shifter left out of the full four

rundown had a lot of trouble at once. So it's not something

that you would leave out.



There's probably fifty ways you could handle the guy out of

valence. Well the first way that was ever written about is

in Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health. It says,

"Get into your own valence." There's was after way you can

handle it. But the case is so over charged he can't stay in

his own valence. So you have to discharge the case. So

anyway a case can be discharged will eventually get him

back into his own valence. But the full four rundown flips

him out of the valence as a body thetan and gets him into

his own valence, so that you can run confront on him. If

you run the full four... 



You recall the being, you run the motivator chain, you run

the engram-overt chain. Those are the actions you take, and

that is the only actions which you take. You actually could

prepcheck it or something. But it seems silly to prepcheck 

it, because it's too hot a button. And that isn't what's 

wrong with him. OK?



Actually I think you did most remarkably well. And I have

noticed, I have noticed that anybody who can pass a long

examination with high grade normally knows what he's doing.



Now there are a few more points I'd like to make here,

before, while I still have a chance to explain them to you.

Now one, at this juncture, it will be available to you. I

have been working too hard with you, and so on, to actually

put together your book of case supervision. And what you

lack is why certain things are done here and there. And I

haven't explained that in all things. It seems sort of

mysterious. And it's funny to me to have to explain it,

because it sort of feels to me like I'm explaining why a

lead pencil makes a mark. You know? Here is this bird and

he has...  It's so damn simple some of these things, you

see? He's got a folder six inches thick! Well now look, if

that many auditors had worked on him for that long,

and he is still getting audited, the case is overcharged.

That's a very clever analysis, isn't it? Thick folder.



So we're going to undertake a lot of actions to take charge

off the case, because it's all on the basis that reality is

proportonal to the amount of charge off it. Alright? But

it's that kind of think. That kind of think. And you

wonder...  Actually C/S 7 was saying to me the other day on

one case here, "God that was clever. To prepcheck a

floating needle. Look what it did for that case. How on

earth did you ever guess that?" 'Cause it just says,

"Prepcheck floating needle." See? Bong. You know? No

assessment, nothing. Bang! You know? And, prepcheck it, and

wow! It goes on and on and on and on and on. And it's all

straightened out. And the case does beautifully.



I'm afraid I can't take too much credit for it, because the

guy has complained to his auditor about floating needles,

and he has even said that every time he gets a floating

needle he feels horrible. He's complained to the examiner

about a floating needle. Not, not very mysterious.



So I just looked at this, and read it over and so forth,

and I was reading through it to find where I could

straighten this case out a little bit more, and I ordered

three prepchecks on it. And the first one to prep check

floating needles. Naturally. You see? So you're not very

mysterious.



It's sort of like asking me to explain why is that white

sign white. What color paint do we use to paint a white

sign? And I look sort of blank, and I say, "Well alright.

White paint." "Great! I never would have guessed it!" You know?



Alright, so this guy, this guy...  It's reading the folder,

it's reading the folder. It's reading what's going on.

That's why auditors have to be able to write. And if you

want to keep yourself from getting headaches as a case

supervisor, you should insist like hell that auditors

either clarify what they've written, or write plainly.

Because otherwise you can pick up a case, you know? Trying

to make the damn thing out, and you want to help the guy,

and somebody's standing in your road with a horrible

scribble, and, and you get strained up on it. Boom.



But you look through this thing and you say, "Well I don't

find my wife, and so on, but in the next session, wa wa wa

wa gab gab and my wife, and so on." Aw, for Christs' sakes!

There's no mystery about it. The guy keeps getting off the

same withhold, and he keeps getting off the same PTPs, and

so forth. And in setting up the case let's just make sure

that these things get cleaned up, that's all. They

obviously aren't getting cleaned up.



One of the ways, and the ways, the idiot way they don't get

cleaned up is, the guy has a withhold, and he gives it as

an ARC break. The guy has a PTP and he gives it as a missed

withhold. So I'm likely to be as evaluative as this. "Prepcheck 

the missed withholds." He keeps giving them as ARC breaks and 

PTPs, and they're very obvious. It's no guesswork on my part. 

I mean, they are. 



See, an ARC break, "I don't know how I'm going to pay for... " 

Oh, god, Christ! That's not an ARC break. Never has, never will 

be. And yet, somebody's running ARCU, CDEI. And then they run 

this column after column, and page after page, and ARCU, CDEI,

and "Do you have an ARC break?" And here's a big fall, and

then they clean up false. And the guy never does give them

anything under gods' green earth but PTPs. And then I'm

liable to say, "Fly the Ruds, but clear each command." And

the case straightens out.



You see, you can't straighten out a case on missed

withholds if nobody asks him for anything but ARC breaks.

You see, it's all this idiot stuff. Like the way to cross

the river, you cross the river. You know? The way to get in

the boat is you get in the boat. If you want to get the PC

someplace in a boat, you have to have a boat to put him in.

You know, it's this kind of stuff.



And the violation of logic is so fantastic as you wouldn't

believe it. And until you're case supervising you won't

believe how easy it is to do. It's terribly easy. Very,

very simple.



Well you can't clean up one rudiment if the guy never,

doesn't know what the rudiment is, and is always cleaning

up some other rudiment. Right? You see, the case, the case

is always having trouble with X, A, or something. He's

always having trouble with this guy, he's always having

trouble with this guy, he's always having trouble with this

guy. Hmm. Well yes, he's at least got a problem with him.

See? So you could actually specify. "Ask him about the

problem with Joe, and by earlier similar itsa get rid of

it." Because he's obviously got Joe identified with Admiral

Henobarbus back in someplace, you know? Wow. It's not

complicated. Cases are not complicated when you know this.

They're very simple. But you have to do the thing you're

supposed to do. And that's what standard tech becomes. For

instance the guy's got to have his ARC break cleaned up.

He's in a sad effect. Alright? He's in a sad effect. What

you gonna do? Sit there and pull missed withholds? Well you

know very well that's idiotic. But it's just as idiotic to

clear up his missed withholds by running ARC breaks. Or,

try to clear up his PTPs by, he keeps saying they're ARC

breaks. Do you see? There's some illogic about all this.

There's something that doesn't add up about all this. And

all you'd have to do is look for what doesn't add up and

that's that.



But I want to make this point with you very sharply. And

that is the available F/Ns. How many F/Ns can you get? Now

you're liable to get yourself a problem that runs something

like this.



Some weird problem. See? And it runs something like this.

Former therapy. And you run the motivator engram. And the

guy's still got a somatic, but it's F/Ned. Well, it F/Ned.

Well you can't do anything more with that, can you? Still

got a somatic. And you know he's still got a somatic of

having his guts cut out or whatever they do. And he ran the

engram of it. Oh, what can we do? All is lost. There's an

available F/N on the overt. You find and run an overt

chain, you find out he was making a specialty of cutting

people's guts out. And that's the somatic.



And that's why it's still there.



Now let's say, here's an actual case, of somebody who had

an Incident 2, shot in the brisket.



Run out, discharge to F/N. Alright, great. Still sore!

Still got the somatic. You say, "Oh wow.



We failed." No, no, there's another F/N available on

shooting people in the brisket. So you run the overt side

of it, and the somatic goes pft! Magically. So you don't do

any more work than you have to do, if you got rid of it

running the motivator side, great. But if you ran the

motivator side, and the guy's left with a somatic, you

still got an F/N on the overt side. Do you follow? Now

sometimes you run "Recall being... ", and then you run

"Doing it... ", and you'll get rid of both sides very

nicely. But it sometimes doesn't work. And remember you've

still got an F/N left. Look at the number of F/Ns

available. On the recall process, any recall process,

there's an F/N available. Any motivator chain of

secondaries, there's an F/N available. Any motivator chain

of engrams, there's an F/N available. Any overt chain of

motivators, there's an F/N available.



There's an F/N available on secondaries, overt secondaries.

There's an F/N available on overt engrams. And there's an

F/N available on recall the overt. So you got one item

assessed off a list, and what do you know? You got six F/Ns

available. The possibility of running them all on most

cases is slight, because you try to run the secondary, and

they're liable to plunge into the engram. But at the very

least you've got two. You have been given a sketchy line up

of it, because it's usually sufficient. But look how many

are available.



Now we've got "Assess the item kicked" on some list. So we

could run "Recall being kicked." Bang. Recall being kicked.

We could also run "Recall kicking." That's two F/Ns. Now we

could run the engrams of being kicked, and we could also

run the engrams of kicking. And that's four F/Ns. That's

four F/Ns on the same subject. It's just which way did the

flow go? So don't feel all is lost if you've run an engram

chain to an F/N. All is not lost. You've got the other

chain you can run. This fellow says, "Well I got this

horrible head, this horrible head, and it doesn't go away,

and my back hurts and my head hurts, and it just doesn't go

away." And you've run all of his head injuries and his back

injuries, and well...  Well get clever. You get clever. You

have an engram chain on the other side you can run also to

F/N, which is him, hurting peoples' heads, hurting peoples'

backs. And you've probably got one on heads, and you've

probably got one on backs. Do you follow? There's a lot of

F/Ns available. But your minimum number of F/Ns on any

button is four. Recall motivator, recall overt, engram

motivator, engram overt And if you, if it's all very sad

and misemotional also, why you've got two secondaries

available. "Recall this death." Whatever it is, see? Being

sad about some relatives' death, see, and you run that

thing out, and that's all squared around. Alright, did you

ever think or running somebody being sad about your death?

Do you see?



See, there's two different things available, see? And very

often when your death engrams or your death secondaries,

rather, won't run, it's because, you know, the fellow just

lost his uncle, and he felt very sad about it, and he's

griefy, and he runs it through and he still feels griery

about death. And it went to F/N but he didn't, didn't feel

so good. And so forth. Run the secondary, run the secondary

of somebody feeling bad about his death. And all of a

sudden the whole thing will go zzzt! And this is the phenomena.



Now hear me now, 'cause every once in a while you're going

to have gotten an F/N on some injury, and then have the

person complain that it F/Ned before he got rid of it. Have

you ever had that happen? It shows up every now and then.



Well it F/Ned on the motivator, or it F/Ned on the overt.

And it hasn't F/Ned on the other side, and there's still

mass there. They're not, they actually if they checked it

over, they're not now sad about their uncles' death. They

just know they got this funny griefy feeling stuck on their

skull. So they say, "Well it F/Ned. I think it F/Ned too

quick. Well sure. It didn't all disappear." Well if that

side of it F/Ned he's released from that side of it.

There's two sides to that, you know. Now you can turn

around and run the other side, whichever way it is, and the

rest of the mass goes pffft! And then that really does F/N.

It'll be a relatively small F/N. But if you've ever had

somebody complain, "Oh well yes. Well I F/Ned on it, but it

really ended off too quick." Yeah well they had it coming

one way and went the other way. You pay a lot of attention

to that. 'Cause you know you're running this guy with

motivators when he's guilty as sin of a bunch of overts. So

he F/Ns on the motivators, but the overts are still there

bugging him. But of course they're all ready to blow.

They'll blow now, go binge You could just run them very

briefly, and they'd blow. But he deserves the motivator,

don't you see? And you ran out the motivator. Now he hasn't

got a motivator, but he's got the overt. So he gets sort of

unhappy. You got it?



That's how many F/Ns there are available. Theoretically

there're six F/Ns available on any button. You should be

able to plot this course off the top of your head. There's

nothing to it.



Alright. Now there's another point here which I haven't

covered with you too well. Missed withholds. Missed

withholds. Missed withholds. You are always asking for

missed withholds, and so forth, and I very often say

missed withholds when I say rudiments. But the rudiment is

withhold. The rudiment is not missed withhold. The standard

rudiment is withhold. Not missed withhold, but withhold.

And here and there in your sessions you've missed a time or

two, because you haven't used withhold. Because there's a

whole line of the whole subject of withhold is absolutely

fascinating. The whole subject of withhold is miraculous

and marvelous.



Guys who go around withholding, and guys who have

withholds, and all of this sort of thing.



You get so accustomed to thinking that a guy is bad off

because he has withholds, that you don't wonder whv he's

bad off because he has withholds. Well, he's bad oft

because he has withholds, not because he's dishonest, but

because he's not flowing in a certain direction. And he

can't flow in that direction, and he keeps it piled up on

himself. And you can get the same action.



Now, as, well you can practically push his face in. You can

get something that feels very much like body thetans, and

so forth, just because the guy is withholding. Just that.

Just withholding. Nobody's missing a withhold. He's just

withholding.



I'll give you an example. Way back when I was fooling

around and doing some research thing, I all of a sudden

found out sitting at breakfast that it was a very

unpleasant proceeding sitting at breakfast, for the

excellent reason that the wax type of milk carton which is

cold, clammy and slimy, sitting only three or four feet

from me, if I would become incautious enough to let my

perceptivity slide out if that far, I would collide with

this damned, cold, slimy milk carton. See? Waxed paper milk

carton. So I'd have to eat breakfast held back from this

milk carton. After a while I'd find myself getting sort of

cross. And I'd get up, and I'd be fine. And then I suddenly

realized, maybe other people get up against things and they

don't go back out in that direction. So I have checked this

out, and that turned out to be the case.



Thetans withhold. They withhold energy, they withhold

beams, they withhold emotion, they withhold mass, they

withhold from going someplace, when they shoot somebody

they withhold from being him. Nobody missed it. And a case

can get just gorgeously stacked up, because of withholds.

Withhold, withhold.



Thus American girls are very often quite withholdy, and the

reason why is, is over in America the girls don't, aren't

taught to shake hands. And they're taught that they must be

reached for, and never to reach. And that it's unladylike

to reach, and that sort of thing. No criticism of it one

way or the other. But you will eventually find them sort

of, and anybody else in the world that's been trained that

way, you eventually find them sort of caved in. And you, as

an auditor, might think they've committed some fabulous

crime. Whereas it's no more important than the fact that

they must not ever reach in the direction of a man. Or

mustn't ever reach in the direction of another person. It's

which directions they mustn't reach. And they're withheld

permanently from that area. See? There they are,

withholding. Withholding, withholding, withholding,

withholding, withholding. Eventually they squash their noses.



And now you come along, and you're asked to perform some

miracle. "Freed me from squashing my nose" sort of miracle,

you know? Now this is very unimportant in the lower grades,

but when you get up into the OT sections, what I'm telling

you now, is very, very important. Because you are going to

find some guys have nothing more wrong with them than the

damn fools keep on holding onto their bodies from in front.

And that those horrible somatics they've got that is

tearing their knees apart, or something like that, is

simply them pushing on their knees. It's very mysterious.



"Oh, what can be wrong with George? He seems to have these

sore throats all the time." Well now the guy is up around

an honest 5, or something like this, and he starts

developing sore throat and so on. You of course don't audit

in this fashion, but you could say, you know, "Why don't

you let go of your throat, boy?" So he'll say, "Oh. Have I

got ahold of my throat? Ha ha ha ha, yes." Very difficult.

Very difficult.



The guys get into OT sections, they one, will withhold from

things, and they can damn near pull their skulls off or

crush their chests or something, see? Or, they've got hold

of the body, or somebody has offered them something and

they've suddenly tensed back from it. And it's practically

busted their ribs or something. And you run into one of

them right after he's flinched from something of this sort.

He walked out of the building and he comes back in and he's

all caved in. And you say, "Oh my god, what masses have we

got? He must have more body thetans. Let's see, what can we

do? What wonderful process do we have to run on this bird?"

And the funny part of it is, if you use the rudiment

withhold, particularly as you get up into the upper

sections, as well as the rudiment missed withhold...  And

the way you do that is you ask for a withhold, and then

determine whether or not it's the kind of withhold which is

discreditable so somebody would miss it, or whether it's

just plain withhold. And you'll ask for the missed

afterwards. Or not ask for it. But the actual proper

rudiment question on OT levels is withhold, not missed.



"Do you have any missed withholds?" Now I've been watching

it go on here for some time, and been expecting in vain for

some of you to suddenly ask the ordinary, garden variety,

way back when rudiment, "Do you have withholds? Or, are you

withholding anything?" Now you start asking OTs if they're

withholding anything, and fifty percent of their somatics

will just go up in smoke. See? So you're missing one.



This is the great ease with which some of this stuff works.

So the guy has just went up and pulled himself back on the

curb suddenly so that he couldn't be hit by the taxi cab.

And he comes in and he's all, so on. You set in, you're

getting in the Ruds. You don't have to know all that. See?

You're getting, "Are you withholding anything?", and "Have

you withheld anything?" Or something like that. And you get

a little read. And he feels wonderful. "Oh yeah! Taxi cab.

I got myself back off the curb. I withheld...  Yeah, that's

it." WhmI Because you're dealing with somebody who is

already pulling, and squashing, and grabbing.



Now theoretically you could also ask somebody, "Where you

got hold of the body?" And that would cause it. On the OT

sections you can't figure out what in the hell is going on,

add that to your repertoire. Just, "Do you have hold of the

body, or are you pushing on the bony in some way?" If

they're not, you won't get any read, and if they are, the

damn meter will blow up.



You got the point? Because you're dealing with somebody who

holds onto bodies, who pulls back bodies, who withholds

bodies, who withholds energy, who pulls in energy beams. Do

you follow? So that you certainly check this on the upper

levels. Not very important on the lower grades.



We found out that newspaper reporters were never, never,

never able, never, never, never, never able to make a

little beep meter we had work. Whereas any, anybody who had

been audited at all could make the thing connect and spark,

and short circuit. We had a little machine.



We'd set it up. And we found that newspaper reporters,

wogs, guys off the street, they'd look at this thing, and

they'd try to do it, see? Rather pathetic. You know? They'd

try to do it, and nothing happened. They couldn't make the

thing close. Actually all you had to do is put a spark

between it, and a buzzer went off. You can set up two, two

contacts, or hold one contact next to a body while the body

is also connected to another contact, a very low voltage.

And you hold that out from the cheek, and then somebody

stands off thirty feet and makes a beam. He puts a beam

between the cheek and the finger, and the buzzer goes. And

he can turn the buzzer on and off at will. It's one of the

most remarkable experiences you ever saw in your life.



The lower level guy, he couldn't do it. And anybody who had

been audited at all, boy he could make that thing go beeps

And off and on, and first he'd say, "Christ, I couldn't be

doing that. That is not possible." And then, ding, "Yes, that 

was me. Hey! I'm an electric eel." See, he could do it. He could 

do it thirty, forty, fifty feet away as far as he could see

it. Which is very interesting indeed.



Now if a guy can do that he also can of course apply close

up on his own body the most fantastic amounts of energy.

Actually you can apply him almost at any distance. You got

that one?



Now also, let me give you another one that goes along with.

Some OTs go around, get a high TA because they lean on

things. And if all else fails, remember that they also can

lean on things. They habitually push against a wall because

rooms are too small. And they don't catch themselves doing

it, and it pushes up their TA. they lean on the wall. Very

simple. They will do anything that a guy would do with

current. Current or force. You can expect anybody to do.



One guy had terrible trouble because he had ringing in his

ears. And he was ringing them.



Now to show you how far out some things can as, there is a

dictionary which I did not do, which is called the

Scientology dictionary. I've never read it. It was called

to my attention the other day that the definition of recall

in it is to reexperience, which is completely wrong. I

merely bring this up as what happens when I start

clarifying materials. A few bulletins, a few things come

out that I haven't written, I haven't said anything about,

there's some errors creed un in those things, and it throws

technology out. This is what you've got to keep an eye out

for. If you run into this sort of thing, why, send it

through to me and let me find out whether or not it is

factual or not, on a clarification. Because you're liable

to get in some arguments with somebody on it.



Another datum I wanted to give you, is you can do two or

three assessments on LX-1 and run each one of them with

engram chains and recalls, and everything else. I mean,

it's quite remarkable. They move upscale on LX-1. They'll

get different buttons. And you can do the same things with

them all over again.



Now, we have, we have pretty well reached the end of the

line here. We have pretty well reached the end of the line,

and we have the general situation pretty well in hand. Not

to pile you up with a tremendous amount of data here in the

last few minutes of play, but I will tell you this. That

putting through this Org VIII Course as we have called it

aboard, has been quite a tour de force. It has been, called

for a lot of coordination in a lot of ways. And I noticed even

down in the last few minutes of play that we were still

riding close to the edge in some instances. And all that

got straightened out.



Now I want to talk to you for just a few minutes here on

the subject of what you will be doing, what your

difficulties might be. First and foremost people are going

to ask you, "What is so different about standard tech that

is different from Scientology?" And a wise guy sort of

answer, which is perfectly legitimate is, "Well you see,

standard tech is the way Ron does it." That was sort of,

just, you know, floor the opposition.



But, the truth of the matter is, is standard tech is a

standardization of processes, so that they apply to a

hundred percent of the cases to which they are addressed.

And that was the main thing. And it was codifying a style

of auditing which produced maximum results in minimum time.

And that was what standard tech was. And they're going to

say, "Well that therefore invalidates my Class IV, my Class

VI." And you say, "Oh no. No, no, no, not, not at all, not

at all. But in due course, when you have learned all there

is to know about everything you can also learn to be

totally simple. And when you achieve that you have achieved

then maximum velocity and maximum gain."



Standard tech is simply how to achieve maximum velocity,

maximum gain in processing, and what are the real

importances in processing, and how do you set cases up, and

what do you do with them. The truth of the matter is, the

subject itself was pretty well wrapped up in 1966, but

required settling down. And it hasn't been until now that I

have settled the whole subject down, and have begun to take

out of the lineup additives which have been put in there

that were unnecessary, and made it come back and do what is

was supposed to do. For instance, as you've seen even on

the OT sections I have taught you how to get something like

maximum gain out of the OT sections. I've taught you how to

get more gain, more velocity, out of the actions which

other people would say, "Well I don't see how that's any

different than anything I've been doing. I sit down at a

table, I let people talk to me while I fiddle with my

E-meter. I don't see how anything's different about that,

and so forth." Well, I'll tell you to whom it will make a

great deal of difference. It'll make a deal of difference

to somebody who has been trying to put across to somebody

that his case hasn't been handled, and people have gone on

not handling it for some time. It will make a great deal of

difference to that person. It will also start to make

difference to anybody else in the vicinity who is audited

by comparison. He's been audited one way, and he suddenly

starts getting audited in a highly simple way, and he

starts making much faster case gains in the same line of

direction.



So in actual fact, standard tech, for all of the

technology, or for all of the work which has gone into the

simplification of it, for all the work of codification of

how I got it across to you, and so on, is more of an

experience than an action. It is something which is

experienced. And after you've been at it for a while you've

either got it or you ain't. You see? It's something you

experienced.



Now just as the lowest mark on the course was the one who

had been audited the least, this coordinated. He started to

catch up undoubtedly in the last couple of days. But it

took a catch up. Because it's something one experiences.



Now I don't want auditors at large across the world to

believe that all of their training is invalidated. Quite

the contrary. What I believe is that somebody has

invalidated their training.



What we're doing is de-invalidating training. What they

have learned, they have learned. And then somebody has

pushed it aside so they felt that is was not learned. And

what it required was a stabilization. And giving one back a

security of the data. And if one had a security of data, he

could then carry on very nicely and very smoothly, because

with that security of data and with somebody holding him on

the square, hair line road of it, he all of a sudden

realized that by doing it just this way, and using just

this data, he all of a sudden got things to fly, which have

never been flown before. And so therefore, the biggest hump

in standard tech is the auditor making it work and the

auditor having it work on him. Can he make it work as an

auditor? Does it work on him? And so on. And out of that of

course, you get your superlative auditor. 



For instance, it'd be very difficult to kid me about how 

this worked or that worked, or something else worked. I 

know how these things work. And anybody who has worked 

very long in this field with standard tech, and he's seen 

this work, and he's seen the put together, and he's managed 

to cut it down to where he's, to look at it is totally simple, 

and so forth, to jar him out of that rut would be very, very 

difficult indeed. In fact people are liable to accuse him of 

being unbudge-able, or conservative, or a fuddy-duddy. "What's

the matter? You mean he won't run PCs wiggling their ears

anymore?" and so forth?



But people are going to ask you. People are going to ask

you, "Why is standard tech so different than just general

tech?" Well actually there is no general tech. There has

really never been anything but standard tech. But, it

required codification, it required delivery, it required

simplification, and once the research line was completed on

it, it had to be delivered and it had to be delivered in

the simplest possible fashion. It is necessary, actually,

for an auditor to go all over the research lines and datas

and side panels, and everything else of this whole subject,

as he does on the Class VI course, before he can appreciate

all there is to know, and how little of it is a main line

action. And if he gets that all settled and straightened

out, he knows a tremendous body of data about the mind.

There are fabulous amounts of it.



You actually, if you settle down on just standard tech only

and didn't know the other lines, then people would think

they were making fabulous discoveries every time they found

out that you could match terminal a couple of mock ups.

See, they didn't know that that was ever part of the

subject matter. But do you know, oddly enough if hypnotism,

and a lot of other subjects of one kind or another went

this route, the material which was evolved in the days of

Mesmer and Charcreax was considerable. There was an

enormous amount of it. And it's been boiled down now to

some little, tiny balderdash that doesn't even work. But

there was a lot known in this particular field. There was a

lot known. And it has all more or less disappeared. It

isn't know to anybody anymore.



It's very funny. Now any day now I expect somebody to break

out and find out that there is such a thing as an hypnotic

rapport. A guy pinches himself in the shoulder and somebody

else feels the pinch. And they're going to be very

fascinated. "How did that happen?" Actually it's all part,

and is called actually, Mesmerism. Back in the eighteenth

century. If one doesn't know the scope of discovery of a

subject he cannot then take hold of its' various

importances. If one doesn't know how wide the study is,

then he cannot also find out how narrow is the walk that

goes through it. If you can grasp that you've got it made.



And you're going to see that when you talk to an academy

student. And you're going to tell him just exactly what

you're doing is great. And he's doing just exactly this,

and you actually think you have a cracker jack auditor, and

he can do exactly what you say, and go ahead and this is

great. And you think that's fine. There is no reason to

make a Class VI out of him, he's doing so well. This guy is

in danger of stepping off the edge of the sidewalk, and

finding out some horrendous thing, like "invent a problem",

get himself some big win, feel that the field has not been

covered or researched, and then he's completely off into

some brand new field.



Scientology being only this tiny, little, simple thing, you

see? He's in this brand new field, which has a vast ocean

of data in connected to it, because he's never been exposed

to the data.



He actually won't be an auditor who can hold the line until

he's also found how much there is to hold. And then he will

understand it.



Now when you try to relay to somebody, "This is standard

tech. I am a Class VIII." Yes, people are going to be

making a bunch of, a lot of fuss over you. That's for sure.

And you have deserved it. You've earned it. They will try

to feel un-invalidated, not invalidated, and this sort of

thing, and be happy about this. Well you can help them be

happy about the whole thing by saying, oh well you see, the

funny part of it is, is all the simple things you know are

true.



And the only difference is, is you don't know how true they

are. And Ron said for me to tell you that standard tech

does not invalidate anybody's tech, but is just the high

velocity, fast, streamlined way through, and it takes the

total expert to do it. It is the road to total gains. Well,

you have to know a great deal.



Now all of you have been trained a great deal down through

the years. You've had lots of training of this way and that

way, and you've done this and you've done that and you've

done the other thing. The net result of it is that you can

look back over it, and you can see, you can see where it's

shined up, and you can see where it was rather dim. And you

undoubtedly, those of you who have been through Saint Hill

recently and so on, and those of you who are very old

timers indeed, have a very good grasp on the whole width of

the subject, have a very, very good grasp on the subject

itself, and know very well it is only where your own

insights have been themselves, then invalidated, by bad

training or by counter-data or something of this sort, that

you've had any loses at all.



Now I'm not trying to tell you you might have known all

this before. That would be a little bit too much. That

would be me bowing out of the picture too much. I have done

a re-evaluation of materials, a re-evaluation of add-ups,

and that is a very definite part of the speed which you

attain in them. These materials have been groomed within an

inch of their lives, really. And this of course is not

something that one normally sees. When one is trained in

some subject he does not see the amount of research or

testing, or other things that go on with it. Well that's

all been there too. But if you notice you have not been

trained anything that was very contrary to anything in your

training. It's more main line than otherwise. But you

certainly have shed a lot of complexities that somebody or

another has given you.



The main, the thing that you will run into is the fact that

auditing is a team action. It's a team action. It requires

the Ethics Officer and the HCO Exec Sec and the Org Exec

Sec and the Qual Sec. and the this one and the that one,

and the promotions people and the this, and so on, and the

handling it up. What I expect you to do, what I expect you

to do is set and hold the standard, and continue to go

forward with the standard. And by doing that, and by doing

that consistently, set up examples of what can be done, and

continue to set up those examples of what can be done, so

that people eventually realize that that's what can be

done. And then they start doing it too. That I do expect

you to do.



And I know you'll do that. It has been an all night, all

day proposition of training the first Org VIIIs. You have

had some fairly damp times of it. I have had some rather

snarly times. I have never read, my C/S 7, the LRH Comm

staff has never made the tape of me snarling over some of

these folders, and so forth, but she often threatened to do

so. Because some of them were pretty gruesome. I mean the

snarls, not much the folders. And somehow or another we

would bring it all off, and somehow or another, why,

amongst us we seem to have gotten through with it. And you

all made it for which I thank you very much.



Now you've contributed a great deal to this class. You have

made the grade in more ways than one. And I appreciate very

much what you've done. And I respect you a great deal for

coming here and going through the lineup, and coming out

the other end victorious. And for that I wish to thank you.



Thank you very much.





*************