6810C12 Class VIII TAPE 16





STANDARD TECH



Well you will be very happy to know, brethren as we are

assembled here together, that we have to bow our heads in

prayer for none of you at the moment since you've already

gotten, each one of you, a well done. Now all you have to

do is get your 85% on the final exam, and in any event you

can make your airline reservations for the sixteenth or the

seventeenth, whatever aircraft you can get on.



What lecture number is this? Sixteen. Fifteenth? Sixteenth.

Gee, I though you'd slipped, or I had. Sixteen. Lecture

number sixteen. And this is twelve Oct. correct? A.D.

eighteen. And the subject of this lecture is standard tech.



I do not envy you going almost single-handedly into an

organization at this particular state of affairs, and

having dumped on your lap what you dumped on my lap when

you arrived here.



(Laughter.) But I'm afraid it is that exact situation.



Now what you lack, because I've been too busy with your

folders, you lack a big chart which gives you the A, B, Cs

of C/Sing. You lack that chart. I've not been given the

space, nor the time to get you together with a big C/S

chart. The, a great deal of the auditing which you have

been doing is OT section auditing. Nevertheless, the

simpler actions apply to the lower grades.



Now remember that you've got to be backed up by the

examiner. Very often a session will look OK to you if you

don't look at the examiners' report. Now it's quite

remarkable, but those sessions wnich were done today, I

think all of them it is reported, got to the examiner with

an F/N. The whole, sweeping lot.



Now when you're really hotter than a pistol they come back

to the next session with an F/N.



They'll not only get to the examiner, but they come back to

the next session. That's asking a lot, but I'm telling you

that it's quite a triumph to get all the guys to the

examiner with an F/N.



Now you must realize that if the report looks absolutely

flawless, and by the time the person gets to the examiner,

he's fallen on his head, that you have a false auditing

report. And the most likely two things that have happened

is the auditor talked too much, and the auditor didn't talk

at all.



It isn't really that he even did something else. It's just

that he did too much in the way of gib, gab, gab, gab. He

got the PC distracted and upset, or he just didn't give him

the commands.



Now the other type of additive you can usually spot,

because it's very often in the auditing report. "Do you

have a present time problem? What postulate did you make

that gave you that problem? What counter postulate was

there to this. Very good. Then give me a problem of

comparable magnitude to it. Fine. Alright, good. Now invent

a problem. Good." You know there was actually a folder

around that's got that in it? From a Class VI auditor. Wow!

And of course the PC just fell on his head. Well that was

easy to spot. Don't you see? That's easy to spot. The

hidden one is all of the stuff that didn't get into the report.



Now you can very often tell all the stuff that didn't get

into the report by the time of the session. The session is

one and one half columns long, but consumed two hours. It

doesn't make any sense at all. How could they have only one

and one half column of work sheet, and worked at it for two

hours? See, that's impossible. So therefore that's a false

auditing report.



Just obviously on the face of it.



Now you are to use the examiner to investigate this sort of

thing, and you can ask your examiner to ask the PC things.

So you send the folder back to the examiner, and you say,

"Examiner, get the PC in and ask him... " Do you follow? So

then the examiner, and you just, you can even make together

a little, a little form. You can mimeo a few forms off, you

know? What you want the PC asked. See? You can get, you can

get another point of view on this.



You can get the examiners' point of view.



Now don't think that the examiner has to be very skilled.

People think they have to put Class VIs on, or something

like that on the examiner post. No, all you want is an

honest person on the examiner post. He doesn't even have to

be trained in tech. 'Cause what's he doing? He's reading a

meter, he has to know the state of the needle, and he has

to be able to write the language you're auditing in. He

also has to know that he must not make an evaluative glares

and sneers, and he mustn't ask a lot of silly questions,

unless he's been told to ask some questions.



Now when you, you can have a PC brought to the examiner.

You get this auditing report back, and you say, "Oh my god,

what the hell is this all about?" And you're trying to

figure out what the hell. It's this thing within two hours.

And you have one and a half columns of work sheet.



And it didn't seem to work out. And the guy got to the

examiner with a D/N and the TA at 5.



What in the name of god happened? He left the session three

minutes before with an F/N at 2, but now it's at 4. What the 

hell is going on? What is going on? Alright, well you don't 

know, so don't hang yourself up in a mystery. Any question 

you have about it, write out the questions and get the answers 

from the examiner. You don't call in the PC. You send the 

folder with some questions down to the examiner. Examiner 

calls in the PC, asks the questions.



Now you normally will get these things just on a straight

examiner form. That is an additional line I'm showing you

exists, don't you see?



Now, if you've got five, six, seven folders, which have

appeared to you totally well done, and the examiner report

was great on them, and you notice all of a sudden that four

of these five are back in review within about forty eight

hours, what do you do about that? You convene a board of

investigation, or a comm ev. 'Cause brother, you're dealing

with false reports. It goes straight onto the ethics line.



You can ask the ethics officer to interview these people.

It is the least action you'd take. And you can convene a

board of investigation, because your neck is out a miles.

Your neck is out a mile. People suddenly start accusing

you. You see, you get the condition you don't assign.



That's the horrible part of it. If some guy's in

non-existence and you don't assign nonexistence, first

thing you know you're in non-existence. It's a weird, it's

a weird mechanism. And it happens. It's actual factual.



So therefore, if you get the thing stacked up, now don't go

around grinding your teeth and snarling to yourself

quietly, and so forth, just put it on the ethics line very

forthrightly. What the hell happened? And you will just be

amazed at the grossness of the error it took.



The auditors, all of a sudden, were writing all of their

reports long after the session to make them look good.

There's a collusion with the examiner. Something weird has

gone on here, see? And the faster you cure it the faster

your tech lines are going to work. So you just are alert

all the way along the line when you're doing C/S work to

these oggilty-boggeldy weirdities.



And don't you try to get weird to solve the situation on

tech lines. These oggilty-boggeldy, what the hell is this?

A guy has Power, 5A, three days later he's reported sick.

Well you know the items of 5A are out. And although it

looks good in the auditors' report, it might even have slid

by the examiner somehow or another the fact that he fell on

his head in any way shape or form. He got sick, he turned

up as an ethics case, something like this. You know truly

a false auditing report.



Now these are the fine points. These are the fine points of

being a C/S. Where you have to be clever in being a C/S is

avoiding anybody pushing you into a position where you give

unusual solutions. 'Cause every time they goof they'll ask

you for an unusual solution. You're being asked to dig them

out of it after they haven't done anything they should have

done. Only they won't tell you they haven't done anything

they should have done. So you could easily push yourself

into a situation where you are being required to give

unusual solutions when all you really are dealing with

anyhow are false reports. So any unusual solution which you

give, which is, which is based on a false report, will just

wind the guy up in another ball. That's what I mean when I

say take it easy. Take it easy on your "He's got to be

audited this afternoon." This thing looks sour, looks like 

something unusual's going to have to be done, and so forth. 

Well  you can have the PC called in and re-examined on a set 

of questions. On the basis of that if it doesn't true up you

can turn it over to the ethics officer. You don't get any

satisfaction there you can turn it over to a B of I or a

comm ev. Do you follow? When these situations become

consistent you make it a B of I or a comm ev. Don't let

anybody get away with it. The next thing you know, you'll

be doing your nut.



Now I'll let you in on something. It's only the lousy

sessions that consume C/S time. It's only the lousy ones.

It'd be interesting to look at the time dates if you knew

the exact sequence of times, if you took a bunch of my

C/Ses you would find that the well dones take about two

minutes. And the lousy ones take up to half an hour. So,

that I would be able to get through a tremendous stack, and

I have done as many as forty six, forty six cases, C/Ses in

one evening, with great care every line, don't you see? And

the lapsed time was about ten hours. Now the funny part of

it is, is out of that ten hours the easy ones didn't

consume an hour of it. And the rest of the whole time was

in trying to unravel the lousy sessions. And it's

interesting that right at that state of time, not your

folders but another zone of folders, and so forth, were

being filled with false reports. And that was what was the

trouble. There were a great many additives in the sessions

which weren't being recorded. And very shortly I alerted,

looked up, and got ethics in with a crash. It straightened

out. It will straighten out. It'll all come out right now.



But when you find yourself then with C/S consuming too much

time, and it's rust a hard job plowing through this, know

then that you're dealing with out tech and false reports.

You just are. You could actually stack up the folders that

are probably false reports. It didn't make any sense. You

told him to do something Monday, and Tuesday it comes back

as apparently done.



And Wednesday, why the case is misbehaving most remarkably,

and that hasn't worked, so you say something else, and it

comes back to you on Thursday. And this TA is way up and

everything seems a bit awry. Well the first thing it tends

to do is shake your confidence in what you yourself are

doing. You can get into a "what the hell", you know? I

have. "What in the name of god is going on?" Perfectly

valid sessions, they're all written up beautifully. Only

those sessions didn't take place. Do you follow? Now that's

pretty gruesome. That's pretty gruesome. But somebody can

throw you an awful curve this way.



Now there isn't any unusual remedy for the situation. A

certain percentage of this sort of thing will happen, so

you simply take care of it that way. Any time, you make it

rule, any time you're asked for an unusual solution you

turn it over to the ethics officer or the examiner. You get

a note from an auditor. "This person is waf waf in waffle

waffle waffle, and yowf waf waft and you've already C/Sed

the folder twice let us say. Two times, and it's waffle

waffle waffle waffle. Don't you go waffle waffling. Your

line to that PC is being cut in some fashion or another,

and you'd what not or will not know until you get some

further information. So you, the least thing you can do is

turn it over to the examiner and have the PC interrogated.



The next thing you can do, maybe after you've done that, a

second action is turn it over to the ethics officer. Let

him look into this. What's the ethics records involved

here? See what I mean? In that way you'll stay out of

trouble. It'll all go smooth as glass. Standard tech is in

or it's out ethics. Do you see? You can't get standard tech

done while ethics is out. Somebody's giving you false

reports, somebody's getting away with murder, and it's just

amazing. It's amazing what can happen. Amazing. You will

find all kinds of weird things. I've been through all this

in organizations all over the place. I don't think there's

anything much could happen that hasn't happened in infinite

variety. I've had tremendous numbers of wins, tremendous

numbers of successes. But some of these points really stand

out.



One time I found that the D of P couldn't possibly get much

done. Yet there were thirty five auditors on staff. But

there was very little happening. And you know I found the

registrar was scheduling the PCs. They weren't being

scheduled by tech services, they were being scheduled by

the registrar. And the registrar would schedule them this

way. A person would come in, and the person didn't, wasn't

even asking when he should be audited or when he shouldn't

be audited, and the registrar would just automatically

volunteer, "Well how much time, how much spare time do you

have?" And the person would say, "Well I don't know. I'm

usually free after seven o'clock in the evening." "Well very 

good. Let's see. Eight o'clock Thursdays. How is that?" Every 

Thursday they were going to have a one hour session.



See, here was complete out-administration. Well nobody

could run that HGC. It was impossible. They had to have

this vast number of auditors who didn't have anything to do.



They didn't have anything to do because no PCs ever showed

up. In processing at any given time there were eighty or

ninety PCs. Well my golly. You would have figured that

thirty five auditors would have cleaned up eighty or ninety

PCs in one awful rush. They would've been out of work by

Thursday, don't you see? 'Cause the sessions weren't all

that long. But it was so fixed that an auditor was only

about doing an hour worth of work every two days. They

could have gone on this way for years. And they also could

have gone completely broke. Do you see?



Now a situation like that makes it impossible for a C/S to

keep anybody busy or live. So this is the other side of

out-admin. Now you, in the first place, don't care how much

time that PC hangs around, as long as when he is to get a

session he gets the session, and what happens in that

session is what you said was to happen in it. And then, you

take a look at the session, and then the next time he's to

get a session, somebody brings him in and gives him a

session. In other words, your tech services is operating

against the action of C/S and the availability of auditors.

Pongety pongety pong. Well that's all an administrative action.



Now it can go the other way around, where you have somebody

else entirely, who is completely out of a zone or area,

who's doing all the scheduling that hasn't anything to do

with anything. You know? It's all being scheduled by the

HCO Exec Sec. And therefore you can't get people audited

when they're supposed to be audited. The less days you

leave a bad 5 out of action, the less, the better. If

you've got to correct 5A, or something like that, and you

want it corrected now. That evening, if possible. So

somebody in tech services has got to be on the ball and be

able to call in whoever it is.



So they have troubles. So, tough. That's tough. You don't

care how much trouble they got.



You're whole action, you're whole action is getting the C/S

done. Getting the C/S done, and getting the case gaining.

Do you, do you see? So your administrative play, you see,

falls in against the tech. And these two things are

coordinated, one against the other. Now you don't want tons

of auditors sitting around on PCs who are falsely and

weirdly scheduled, and so forth. The scheduling of PCs is

very much in the hands of the tech services. And it's very

much under the orders of the C/S. Just recently, believe it

or not, in another zone I had two PCs who just plain

goofing it, boy. They were goofing it up most gorgeously.

And another PC who was pleading that he should go to the

hospital and have his throat cut or something. And he had

this as a thing. And, you ever once in a while go into a

hospital and you ask some of the patients. "Well I'm going

to have an operation, ha ha heh." So you say, "Is anything

wrong with you?" "I don't think so. Oh yes, I;ve, I've got

something. I don't know what it is, just something. I had

something else last week, but they're going to operate on

me." Guys are just dramatizing, see? So I was ordering

these people to be audited, and audited now. And boy, you

would be surprised at the amount of force and pressure I

had to bring in to get them audited, and the guy who was

pleading to have an operation, they didn't get around to

him. He went over, and the next thing I heard, he'd had his

operation. Ah! One useless hole.



So you see, tech services, and so on, can fail to back you

up. The auditing doesn't occur in terms of time when you

want it, or they are trying to force you to get the case

audited in some speedy fashion or something, to suit the

convenience. You don't care how inconvenient it is for the

PC. You get it? You don't care how inconvenient it is. You

don't care how hard tech services has to work. This is to

hell with it. You understand? And if it's a matter of

straightening that case out carefully, you want that case

straightened out carefully, and you want to watch every

step of the case as it comes along the line, to then the

ratio that the less trust you have in the auditor, the more

actions and the more times you want to inspect it. Why sell

down the river everything from zero to four? If you're

going to sell anything down the river, let's sell the Ruds.

Let him goof the Ruds. Let him goof a little assessment of

some kind or another. Why sell a grade down the river?



Now this is all part of setting the case up to have the

major action done. And you as a C/S have the job of setting

the case up to get a major action done. Do you understand?

So if there's any insecurity on your part that the case

isn't going to be set up for the major action, and

somebody's just going to slap-happy the major action on

through the lines, bah! At that point you start putting on

the brakes. See? Fly the Ruds. And give him any. Give him

anything.



Don't give him a grade. So you fly the Ruds and...  Don't

give him a grade.



So there's two ways you can use little prep checks and

L-1's and things. (Laughter.) In actual fact, in all

respect to this class, I haven't been doing that just to

give you something to do. I have used them meaningfully to

set the case up better. But I wouldn't, I wouldn't think

twice about it. Assess the following. And we've seen some,

way back here that the PC was once a bank cashier. And

seems to have failed at it. 'Cause it's back in some kind

of a withhold he was giving. But when he was a kid he

didn't want to be, he wanted to be a banker, but now he

tells he better not. Because so on and so on. Well good.

Alright. Alright. You got some clue.



We don't care where they got the clue. You can even issue

interrogations to get clues. You saw me do it recently.

"What is your state of OT?" And I picked out the

physiological illnesses and audited straight in the

direction to set the guy up, to bring up a section or zone

of his case which must be holding him down from

exteriorization.



Alight, now I gave you a drill on this, see? Now that isn't

a standard form to amount to anything. But you can call it

a standard form. You can make up these forms. "What careers

have you followed that you have failed at?" Turn it over to

the auditor and get it assessed. Prep check it. What you

gonna get? You're gonna get the rehabilitation of a failed

purpose. The guy is immediately going to be less tired.

Well when you know when these things are the interplay is

very simple. Once again under this heading, you're looking

for a zone or area to audit so that you can test fly this

PC. What's he gonna do?



So you never want to hand out major actions. "I have come

to Saint Hill to have Power. I'm going to want my Power

processing." "C/S, he's going to have his Power

processing." Alright, somebody's going to try to tell

whoever is C/Sing around there that it's really not

necessary to C/S the folder before he gets his Power

processing, because after all he hasn't had any Power

processing yet. You don't know where this guy is within

seven miles of being set up for Power. Power only works

like a bomb, and only works fast.



I'll show you how you can save time. It only works fast

when the PC is set up and pointed.



He's got to be all straight as a die, and then send him

through Power, and pongo! You really get results - I've seen

a PC completely change his character when he was set up for

Power and had Power.



Alright. Now a PC who isn't set up for it, it doesn't even

change his ARC breaks. So your proper action is to make

very sure that anybody coming in for Power, has his folder

at once turned over to C/S. And that the folder, whether or

not you are the C/S or not, just make sure that the folder

is turned over to C/S. And then they would test fly this

guy. So we take some completely unlimited process, you

know, like assess a list, prepcheck it, do L-1 on

auditors, anything, you know? Assess a list, auditors,

auditing, yowowowow. Do a list 1. Brrrrrr. See? Item by

item, item by item, item by item. To F/N. Well Christ, you

can tell by the length of that list how near he is to being

acceptable for Power. The auditor, it didn't fly until item

fifteen.



Wow! This case is charged up like a galvanic battery. I'll

bet you he has not even vaguely got his grades. It was hard

to do, don't you see? You could look over on the

assessment, and that all seemed a bit difficult. But they

managed to finally settle on 'auditing'. And then the L-1

on "auditing" went the whole page. Each one reading. Oh wow!

Now do you see as a C/S you have an estimate of charge? How

charged this guy is. Bow long does it take him to clean up

his ARC breaks? How long does it take him to do this? How

long does it take him to do that? It takes him a long time,

case is heavily charged. Doesn't take him very long, case

isn't heavily charged. It's elementary.



Now supposing the case has "been rehabbed" in Keckuk on all

grades. And your first action of a prepcheck took all

morning and half the afternoon to get it to F/N. Well I

wouldn't, I wouldn't say your auditors TRs were any good doing 

it. But this is against, also against the fact that you must be

dealing with a, a very charged up case. So alright. Let us

rehab or run ARC Straightwire. Not as you've been getting

ARC Straightwire to four. Fly the Ruds, rehab ARC

Straightwire or run. Get the folder back. Boy, you're now

liable to find the damndest things you ever heard of, see?

Well we actually, actually either he didn't know what ARC

Straightwire was. There was somebody that told him he was

once run on a recall process, and he couldn't remember very

much of the auditing. And it didn't F/N. The TA hasn't gone

up terribly, and nothing bad has happened, and so forth.

Now you're left with a riddle. Has he ever been run on ARC

Straightwire? Hell now if the case is charged up you know

at once that he hasn't actually gone up through the grades.

There's something missing on the grade line.



Now if you don't trust the auditor too much you're going to

make that; you're not going to throw away the whole rehab.

You're gonna get ARC Straightwire rehabbed or run. Fly the

Ruds, rehab ARC Straightwire or run it.



Now, if you really didn't trust the auditor at all you

would say, "Check the state of ARC Straightwire and send me

back the folder." Now from that data we could determine

whether or not to rehab it or run it. So we could say,

"Rehab it." Or we could say, "Run it." Do you follow? You

could, you could slow it down to that, that almost nowhere.

So the amount of action which you assign to be done is

proportional to your confidence in the auditor in turning

in a result and a factual auditing report.



And the action can get very damned complex after a while on

this sort of thing. You can say, do this, do that, do the

other thing, do the other thing, do the other thing, only

god, they don't have a ball, see? Because auditing which is

administered quickly without any chance for any intervening

PTPs or anything like this, really flies the guy. But also,

auditing which administered very badly is better done in

little pieces, so that you can straighten it out before it

all goes sour. Do you follow?



So this is the degree of approach, the degree of approach

in case supervision. Now what you audit, what you order to

be audited probably is occupying your attention. It

probably is. I can turn you a chart out. I've been too busy

working with your folders to give you a chart at this time,

a chart will be in existence at the time anybody is

listening to these lectures. And it's just an A, B, C

proposition. One of the reasons I don't get busy on it, and

so on, it looks too simple to me. The simplicity is so

simple, and I see people bongle-bingling around on this.



Well, my god. What could they possibly be floofing about? 

You know?



And yet I see, I see early on in the Org 8 Course and with

other experiences I've had recently teaching this, the most

complex damn C/Ses you ever heard of! People, you know,

they, they look at the - administrative blunders of sessions

as something that must be remedied. I don't know why they

have to go back to 1962 to get a comma corrected. What the

hell is going on? Don't you see? I mean, I'm very puzzled

about what is this surer complexity I suddenly see in my

lap? And it's interesting, that for OT cases, for OT

section repair and so forth, it's interesting that nearly

all or your suggestions here, toward the end of this

course, are dead on.



See? You're calling your shots dead on. And the only place

I am in disagreement with it, is I find another piece I can

take off. And you didn't quite see that I was heading cases

for exteriorization by discharging them. So I was looking

for another piece I could take some charge off, before I'd

finally let it go. See? You get, you get what I was going,

see? 'Cause I'm actually trying to set you up for 7 and 8.

And this, this is really the auditing you're getting.



I'm just setting you up for that.



It isn't, it isn't that it's terribly far to go, or

anything like that, or that you're in bad shape, or

anything like this. But in numerous instances we have

actually been able to bring about exteriorization and all

that sort of thing. And I've been working on that, and so on.



Well this is not necessarily the target that you will find

a lower grade case working toward.



What he thinks is wrong with him, what he thinks is wrong

with him will be of one or two categories. He isn't total

OT in the last ten minutes of the first session, you know,

so that gives him a lose. And it was totally unreal to him.

He wouldn't even know what the hell an OT was.



But it's usually he's measuring his gains about whether or

not he worries about his wife. You know? So all of his

gains are measured against something like this. Or, in the

morning he has, his foot hurts. And after he's been audited

does his foot hurt? See? This kind of thing.



So he has a tendency with his terrific complexity to start

backing you into the field of healing, or something. And

your stable datum, your stable datum on that is, is the

case will right itself by you simply finding any available

charge. You don't find any available feet. You just find

any available charge.



Now I've tried to teach you a few times. Somebody comes in

with a cold, or somebody comes in with an ear. Do you

follow? Alright. Now I say, I say so and so and so and so.

"Find an engram or chain and run it. First available that

you can find. Just any engram chain that you run. Any

engram chain you find on this case will have the ear on

it." Do you follows Yeah. So it's, it's so... 



So it's any available charge does anything. You see it's

that gross. And in doing case supervision and in auditing,

and so forth, you don't have to grope around to find the

head or the bottom of the pencil. It's just what I've been

trying to teach you. It's where can you get some charge

off? How can we get some charge off?



Alright, if we can get some charge off of the guy, well we

can straighten him up. If we can't get any charge off we

won't. There is no magic button which makes a case well

without taking charge off. See, all magic buttons, they

might be awfully magic. But they will depend on the amount

of charge they got off the case. Do you follow that?

That's, that's the whole of it.



Now there's various things that actually mechanically

render this, that and the other thing. Let's take an out of

valence case. A case that is out of valence is already

heavily charged. He'd have to be heavily charged. Now the

exact mechanics of this are very, very interesting. And

I'll let you in on one little series of processes.



You may or may not know that Power processing, in its'

entirety, was synthesized by myself without using it on one

single PC, and with having no subjective reality on it of

any kind whatsoever myself, because I was already clear. It

is one of those wild tours de force in the field of that. I

set up what a case will be in the state of, and then

figured out what it would take to bring about certain exact

end phenomenon. And then wrote up each Power process, and

then wrote up the three 5A processes on the same thing.

Without a single test, without a single case, with no

subjective reality on it, I didn't have any case that could

be run on that. A little bit afterwards, to give you a

laugh, I decided that I should probably be run on some

Power processes to get a subjective reality on it. And

about two commands later I was wrapped around seven

telegraph poles. It did not function, boy. Because I was

already clear. And I've noticed this before. When they try

to rehab Power after clear, when they try to run Power

after clear, it normally throws a guy into a rag bag,

because his case is not in the shape that it takes it. So

it's sort of cleaning a clean, it makes him look for things

that aren't there, there are computations he no longer has,

so to try to run them, he sort of has to mock them up, and

when he does that, why he says he doesn't quite own them.

And it tends to make them solid, and you're liable to put

him in the damndest black mass you ever heard of in your

life. And then you're going to wonder where it came from.



But below clear, Power was totally synthesized. Every

single step of it. And then, I wrote up the bulletins of

Power, and they were all experimental bulletins, and put

people onto Power, and did my first Power cases, and so

forth, and they all came out like that. And I was watching

it like a hawk, because I was doubly, trebly critical of

it, because it'd been totally synthesized.



How the hell did these end phenomena be so exact? He so

right on? See? They were perfect, on the line. So that was

the they were supposed to behave, and that was the way they

behaved.



And it wasn't because I was saying so, because I was saying

they shouldn't behave that way.



And they went right on up the line. Bong bong bong bong

bong. And we had Power processing.



Now, this is an interesting tour de force. Now there is

another zone where this has just occurred in the low TA

case. In order to teach this first Class VIII Course I had

to know what a low TA case was. I knew what a high TA case

was. But I had to solve, once and for all, what was the low

TA case, so I could give you the hot dope, because that

would make a zone or area in doubt, which was in the

technique which would continue to worry you. Now I could

handle a low TA case at OT 3, because it's forced into one

position or another by body thetans. Either the body

thetans are gone and he's still standing back thinking

they're still there, you can do various things at this, but

I had to know the identity of this. Well first it could be

cured, more or less, at Power. Pr pr 6 has a tendency if

run exactly correctly, to cure a low TA case. And it cures

a few of them. But I had to find out exactly what this was.

So I sat back and I figured out exactly what is a low TA

case. Exactly what is one? And I want to teach you this

exact mechanic, because this was totally by synthesis. I

hadn't had a low TA. Don't know anything about them. No

reality on this of any kind whatsoever. So I had to figure

it out from scratch.



And here is the basic background of the low TA case. Now

let me - Now let me show you here, let me show you here what

we will call a time track. Now, this time track here is

wide, from the bottom up, in terms of time. We don't care

what gradients they are. This is the actual time track in

which he would be in valence. You got it? He would be in

valence. OK? Now, at this low point of the time track we

have an area where the individual has had an incident on

his own time track, which is so gruesome that he has gone

into the behavior I have seen on some preclears. Some

preclears desert their own sphere and action to a point

where, in the engram, you pick it up originally, you fine

they're a little girl in the crowd at this execution, and

they can't quite tell what kind of an execution it is, but

they're a little girl in the crowd. And you run it through

the next time, and you fine out that there were actually a

post on they think maybe, the gallows. And then you run it

througn again, and you find out they finally discovered who

they were. They were the headsmans' axe. And it's a beheading.



And then you run it through again and you find out that

they're the headsman. And then you run it througn again,

and so help me Pete, there they are on the block and down

comes the axe.



In other words, they've gone out of valence successively

and repeatedly, further and further out of valence. You got

it? That was because they wouldn't want to be that, they

couldn't confront being there, and so on. Now that

experimental data is from way, way back. Way, way, way, way

back. 1952, and so forth. So I would action, "What the hell

is this low TA?" I know when the guy goes out of valence. I

have this much check on it. When he goes into valence of a

body thetan, or he goes out of valence, he goes into a low

TA. Well what the hell could this be?



Alright, well what it was is he had this horrible

experience. And he moved off there, off the time track. He

moved from here over to there. He went. He says, "To hell

with being that guy.



That guy gets into trouble. I'm somebody else now."



So there he was safely over there. Now that experience then

keys out and, you see by a dotted line here, he comes back

onto his own time track. And then he lives for a little

while on his own time track, and then one day somebody's

selling headsmans' axes or something, and he goes flip. And

actually he goes back into that incident. It's a lock. He's

now out of valence again. Do you see? You got it? And every

time you have a lock on this you charge that up some more.

Charge the basic incident up some more. See? So that's

another bar. Another bar on the side over here. See?



So now he comes up the line again, and he comes all

trustworthy, and everything is fine, and he thinks life is

gorgeous, and everything is OK. And all of a sudden he gets

himself into...  He finds himself standing on the platform

up amongst a crowd. And he says, "Oh my god!" You know,

reality break. "Ahhh!" Break. No where to go. Another lock.

Puts another one on here.



Down on this basic one. See? We'll try to label the engram.

And this is lock one, the first time it happened, lock two,

the second time it happened.



Now he comes back over here more cautiously. But when he

runs into a little girl like the one in the crowd, he goes

bango! Out here, out of valence, which is lock three. Got

it? Each time it's takes him longer and longer and longer to 

come back onto his own time track, and to be himself. Do you 

see? And every time this happens, there was lock one, lock two, 

and lock three. They're adding up charge down here.



Now after a while, down here in the engram, the guy, that

thing is just so charged up with locks he couldn't get

anywhere near it. He just couldn't come close to it. So

that if you tried to get it by normal engram running, he

just wouldn't go near it. And anybody who even faintly

invalidates him, he's in such a state after a while,

anybody who faintly invalidates him drives him out of

valence. So his tone arm goes down.



So on such a person invalidation knocks his tone arm out of

sight. That means that there is such an incident as this on

the track. It is so neglected that even though he knows

he's mocking things up and so forth, he doesn't even know

enough about it to know that he's still mocking it up. Do

you see that mechanism?



Well I figured this all out synthetically. This is all

synthetic. Cause I don't have it. So what I did is I put

together a whole bunch of words which when assessed would

make a guy have the idea of moving on his own time track

over to there. Overwhelmed, driven out, wiped out, anything

you could think of, whereby he was gone here, and appeared

over here at the engram.



Now when we assess that, this is the way it, this is the

reason it works. When we assess it by, wiped out,

overwhelmed, list LX1, when we assess this thing, why we

get the basic postulate that's got him over here. We've

kicked the edge of it. It's something like boy I don't want

there to be anymore of that, whoa...  And which comes under

dislocated, see? Or denied, or some... 



He's expressed it in some fashion, do you see? And now,

here's the oddity. In order to run this engram, or get near

this track, we have got to discharge the locks off the top

of it. So we recall being whatever assessed. And that wuf

wuf, that puts as you see these big X's, that knocks that

off. Then that also knocks that much charge off the engram.

Now we find the engram of being, he goes right there, and

you get the engram wiped out. Now all of a sudden he can

get into valence.



Now just to make sure that he isn't also hung with the

overt, you can also run the overt chain of engrams, doing

each one past an F/N. That is to say, you've got an F/N on

the locks, you got an F/N on the, on the motivator engram,

and you can get an F/N also on the overt engram.



Well by that time all of this slide out of valence every

time I turn around is cured. And then he can get back to

as-ising his own time track, because the trouble with this

guy is, is every time he goes out of valence or is the

least bit invalidated, he can't get any case gain. The

auditor sits into the session, and slightly invalidates

him, he slides out of valence, and therefore he doesn't

as-is what he's running. So it won't F/N. He actually ARC

break needles. He's just dead body. You got the silly

mechanics of this?



Well, apparently that's the way it is. That's exactly the

way it works out. The wildest thing you ever saw in your life.



So this type of action is as part and parcel of discharging

a case. Do I make my point? (Yes.) Now this was an

important zone or area of discharge, because I found there

was some people that even though you did a four rundown,

nothing much happened. So we had to figure out, because

that coordinated against the fact they were low TA cases.



Now the odd part of it is you can do this exact action at

engram level. Now this really puts one into your hands,

boy. That takes a case that's all the way down there at the

bottom of the grades. Well you can undoubtedly run it

again, up along the line someplace. It will have changed.

But this actually will run clear down at the level of

Dianetic engram. So you've got a powerful tool in your hands.



So you find this guy and he just can't seem to make it. And

he's got a black field, and he can't see anything. Well of

course what he should do is get OT 3. But as the chances of

running OT 3 on him without proceeding up through the grades 

is so slight as to skip it. You couldn't do anything with it.

He'd look at you incredulously. He wouldn't believe

anything about anything. But you can do this. He'll run

very shallowly, he'll probably stay in this lifetime.



The engram will erase. He won't have any real idea of

what's happening. But boy, will he discharge enough, and

all of a sudden he isn't the black field case. Now that's

your rough case. Not necessarily the case with the black

field, 'cause he intends to be very often high. But they're

alike overcharged. They alike don't as-is. But if you get

your low TA case, that's the one you use. Got it? I tell

you, it'd work on either one of them. But it's your low TA

case special. Any such put together as you see in LX-1. And

the handling of it is one, two, three, four. And you know

exactly what it is.



Alright, now let's take another case. Let's take this, well

let's take what used to be the black five. There's the

invisible one too. See? But there's the black five. And

he's way up through the roof. And he's reading at 5 on the

TA. Now that comes down, ordinarily, on the process, "What

has been overrun." Rehabbing each one.



You're going to have your heart broken here and there where

you give that process out, because somebody's liable to

just make a list. The worst you'll see on it is, they make

a list and they don't even put down what read, and they

don't rehab any of it. And they've made you your list. You

could even explain it to some guys and say, "Now look. You

list what has been overrun this way. What has been overrun?

It is not a legitimate listing question, it merely gives

you an assessment. It's a sort of a, of a horrible thing,

which lies between listing and nulling and assessment. See?

It's neither fish nor fowl. It is simply an auditing

question which you happen to write the answers down on.

That's all." You could do the same thing. You could write

the answers down to level zero. See? And, you'd find one

agreed and another agreed, and it wouldn't come out to one

item. 'Cause it's not a listing auestion. But you can use this.



So, the PC is asked, "What has been overrun?" And then he

lists, and he gets a long fall.



Maybe he lists the first one, and it doesn't read at all.

So you don't touch it. And then, long fall, "Alright, very

good. Peeling potatoes." You simply rehab peeling potatoes.

And you know, I've seen the most complicated rehabs

recently, and I suddenly remembered that the earliest rehab

bulletins, and so on, have not been condensed and

rewritten. There's too much tech in those things. Those,

they contain the actual complete steps of a rehab, and a

rehab does go that way, but it isn't that hard to rehab.

It's just how often was he released on the subject is all

you need for a rehab, and it goes F/N and that's it. So you

don't have to follow those, those early, early rehab... 

Remember, those were back written just about the time I was

synthesizing Power, and for the first time found that

auditors had been overrunning F/Ns. And experience since

that time has brought more data to view, and the data which

we have brought to view is simply that it is only necessary

to ask them the number of times they went release while

doing something. And they F/N. particularly if you make

them count up the times. It's very simple.



So you could, you could actually overrun rehabbing if you

get it too complicated. And the only reason people don't

rehab, and why it had to be trickily rehabbed, is because

the rehab itself was hard to deliver to the PC. So it's

been very simplified. "How often were you released?" See?

Count the number of times. "How often were you released

that didn't F/N?" Or, Were you released? Didn't F/N on

that, so count the number of times. And a guy counts the

number of times, and all of a sudden you get an F/N and

that's it. And it's an elementary action.



Now while you're doing that you have to watch it, 'cause

there's one thing that you don't at this time do, is you

have to watch it to make sure that your TRs remain in. You

watch it.



Because you see, you could rehab operations or something

like this, and get an ARC broke needle on it, and not

notice it. But an ARC break needle's very easy to

establish. Because you've got bad indicators with it.

Alright, rehab bad indicators with it. Why just ask if

there's an ARC break or something, in connection with this

subject. It's as easy to do as that. And, you put in the

Ruds before the release. And it then flies. And the actual

mechanism which you're using is, if you, you know, it won't

rehab or something like this, and the F/N is an ARC break

needle, there's trouble here. Some kind or another. Just

put in the Ruds on the subject. And that's quite allowable,

because it's on that subject, so it limits it.



Now when you try to put in the Ruds, if you put in the Ruds

generally, something like this, made me cough to think

about it. If you put in the Ruds, something weird like

this, "In living...  You know, "In living...  before, before

living, was there an ARC break?" Enough to make anybody cough.



Now this is a silly one. See? You see, you could ask the

guy in any limited way. So in the taking, in the taking of

ether; he's an ether sniffer or something. And it won't

F/N, something like this. And you could ask him, "Well, in

the taking of ether was there any ARC break or something

like that?" Because you've limited it. And actually what

you'll do is put in the ARC break, and so forth, and you'll

get your F/N probably on the ARC break. To hell with the

ether, it probably doesn't have any F/N in connection with

it. Do you follow? So that you can slide and get yourself

sideways out of a rehab by putting in the Ruds in the

vicinity of that rehab. You got it? So you don't get caught

in a trap of having a no F/N. I know it's, it's rather... 

It's, is it a going to?



I tested this out one time on the subject of death. Well it

was obvious that any mass existed because there had also

been a release. It's true, because it makes a sort of a

GPM. Freedom, trapped. Do you see? It's a sort of a GPM

sitting along here. So anyplace a guy's got a lot of mass

he must be comparing it to a release. So in any area of

mass there's a release available.



Somewhere in it. Now it takes considerable glib auditing

skill to all of a sudden say, "Da da da da, been released,

and so forth?" "Well yes." You get a fall on it. The only

reason it's hung up is there's also a release in it.



You ask this fellow, "Well now, you say you were taking

kerosene for kicks", and then it releases, and the needle

doesn't move and nothing happens, and no, no there isn't

anything to that. It's all the same. Well don't try to

force through a release, 'cause there is none. There's

gonna have to be some needle action, but if there's mass

there there's also a release there.



You can ask yourself if this guy is so stuck in the stuff,

how does he also get to here? 'Cause he is in PT. He is in

present time. Well how'd he get here? Well he must have

moved out of what he was in. See, that, that's quite, quite

obvious. So of course if he moved out of what he was in he

was stopping it, because it was overrun, as I gave you in

the last lecture, so he has the mass, which he's got a stop

on it. But remember he's still here, he isn't there. So

obviously you can find a release point. Do you see? There's

nothing much to this actually. But if you sweat at it too

hard you get him up to stopping it. And you can get the

stop point and then it won't release, and the TA will go

up. So it's a rather slippery action.



So you count the number of times, or something like that,

and you don't sweat at it very hard.



If it won't release it won't release. And you're going to

run into this sooner or later. Find somebody who won't release.



Now there is a way that you can still get a release on it.

You say, "Well did you take anything earlier on the track

that was similar to kerosene?" "Oh yes, yes. We used to

take balderdash in the old days. I just remembered. Yes."

F/N. "Thank you." You can get yourself out of that one.

Because the overrun is so overrun, that the releases are no

longer available in it, don't you see? But these few well

chosen approaches to the subject give you a road out.



So, we do what has been overrun. Anything he'd list can be

rehabbed. If it reads it can be rehabbed, because he's no

longer stall with it. So there is a release point which is

registered in it. All you got to do is make it do its'

release point again, and he'll come off the obsessive stop.



He'll cease to mock it up.



Now if it's driven down to an ARC break needle by this it

will be because there's roughness in the session, normally.

But you can now put in the Ruds with regard to it, or the

session, and it'll rehab. And if it just won't rehab at

all, then you just think, "Well what was similar to

kerosene earlier on the track?" And you can rehab that, and

that will rehab kerosene. Do you understand? That's a very

simple action. You've probably been amazed to sit there and

watch those F/Ns happen so fast. Well it is a tribute to

your smoothness as an auditor. But you're going to have a 

grade 2, a Class 2 trying to do this for you, and so forth. 

He will really be sweating. And he'll be saying, "But how 

could it?" You know? "What if it doesn't? What if I don't get 

an F/N on it?" That will be the question which you will be 

having to answer. And the answer is, "Well you better had." 

And you just tell him to ask for, if it was and how many times. 

And if he can't do it, to cease and desist the session at once 

and knock it off. On the first one. Don't let him go through 

twelve of them. If he can't do it he can't do it.



But the mechanism of it can be so exaggerated, and there

can be so much data on it, you know? Wow. You have to have

the idea however there is such a thing as mental mass. The

mental mass is there because it's hung up on the track

because of a GPM. The guy did get out of it.



One, he was released before he got into it, and two, he was

released when he got out of it. And in the middle of it

someplace he may have been released a half a dozen times.

because of it.  You see?  So it's the chances are there's 

several releases available.  And all of those get him off 

the kick of stopping it.  And it sort of occurs to him, "Hey 

wait a minute.  I got out of that.  Therefore, why mock it up 

to get out of?"  What you do is unstabilize it.



The electric eel characteristics of a thetan are plus and

minus.  You knock out the minus, the pluses go, you knock

out the plus, the minus'll go.  Well he's not going to get

out of it because you want him out of it.  The reason why

there's mass there, it's hung up with the release.  See? 

He, he's got it because he got out of it.  But the got out

of it, don't you see, is the plus-minus of a GPM.  It's

like they throw the R-6 pictures.  All the R-6 pictures are

in black and white, which hang him up, see?  Pink and

green, hang him up.  So you get your opposite numbers, your

opposite color wheel.  And it tends to hang him up.  Loud

and quiet, high and base, see any opposite.  Then you'll

find out the whole nomenclature and actions of implants and

everything else is based on plus and minus.  For some

reason or another they hang together.  So you got a plus

and you got a minus.  So you can knock out the minus, or

you knock out the plus, the other one'll go to hell.



So the guy is hung with a mass, you knock out the release,

and the mass vanishes.  Do you see?  That's actually the

only mechanic you're working with.



Fellow says, "Well I don't know, I'm in R-6 and I see only

these colors, you know?  There's green ushers, and there's

pink audience, and the things are turning pink, green..." 

And so forth.  You say, "What's pink?"  And the picture

will dim.  His attention is spread on both pink and green. 

See?  Just get him to look at pink.  And the green will

vanish, and there goes the pink.  You should know this

mechanic, because it's one of the simple mechanics of the

mind.  I ran into an engram which was silver and black. 

Very interesting.  Silver and black, half and half.  Which

made up white, black type of action, one against the other.



Now space and solid also makes a plus and minus.  Space and

a mass.  You see, this can be strained at fantastically to

make things hang together one way or the other.  So there's

always releases available, and in this whole subject of

overrun, when you run "What has been overrun?", there's one

of these doubles.  You don't even have to ask for it, if

the guy'll tell you what the half of it is, you're asking

for the release.  Well he's been concentrated on the mass. 

You ask him for the release and that is, you ask him for

the moments he didn't concentrate on the mass, and to that

degree, with relationship to the mass, you've moved him on

the time track.  So the mechanic of it is more simple than

was imagined originally.  He didn't have to think of

anything, really, to give him a release point.  It's just

all the auditor did the whole thing.



So anyway, the net result of this is, that you have a lot

that you can do. Now after the guy's gone along, I mean in

C/Sing you've got a lot of it. When a guy's gone along in

auditing for six and a half months, and he hasn't had a

session for that length of time, and he comes back in

again, and his TA is up and so forth, the probability is

that there's an overrun in between. And "What has been

overrun?" is a completely unlimited process. You're just

trying to find out what can we rehab on the case. So the

guy puts the item down, the item reads, the auditor rehabs

it. Do you see? "What's been overrun?" "Weighing fish

baskets." "Very good. Alright, is there a point of release

on your weighing fish baskets?" "Oh yes." F/N. "Alright."

"Oh yes." No F/N, "How many times?" "Ff ff ff ff, one, two,

three, four, five, six, every night. Every night there was

a moment of release, I would leave work." F/N. "Thank you."

So you're getting off those overruns, one right after the

other.



So, discharging the case with anything that would handle

throwing him out of valence, it's your LX-1 approach, and

they can do more than one of those. That's your low TA,

that, he R/Ses easily by the way. A low TA case also R/Ses

easily. And then your high TA, your high TA is overruns,

and it is vital that you rehab them. Now your normal TA,

your normal TA might be just nasty tempered or something.

But he is readily solvable. Readily solvable. But you still

might have to discharge this. So setting us a PC to have

the grades run gives a gain on the grades, the like of

which you never heard of before. Wheee!



Now it's a shame to see somebody use the grades to take the

TA down, or something dumb like this. Oh, I've seen it

done. I've seen it done. It's a shame to see somebody who

has come through the grades, and all he's handled is his

current PTP. He's actually worried about getting back to

Keokuk, and all you see in the grade responses is "Getting

back to Keokuk." "I could talk about getting back to

Keokuk, my wife will worry if she gets back to Keckuk,"

it's a service facsimile, "I could make people wrong by not

getting back to Keokuk." So the case isn't set up. So you

can always get an estimate, not on a personality analysis,

but you can always get an estimate. The length of time in

session, the thickness of the review forms, and so on. And

the number of actions which you take is proportional to the

numbers of actions which have had to be taken. It's a

direct coordination. So you know immediately it's a

resistive case.



Now some people are going to resist like mad, having a

resistive case run on them, because they thinks it's an

evaluation. So you can call it a special case. But it

doesn't mean anything. It just gives you something else to

run. And in a great many of these cases they won't solve

even vaguely before you pound right through on that

resistive case. That's your real resistive case.



Boy when you do the assessment on that thing, and it says

"former therapy", fall, fall, fall, fall, fall. You're

liable to find something on the order of, when you're

dealing with the public at large you're liable to find wild

ones. Nothing can...  Guy's in scientology in fairly good

shape, but boy you can find some wild ones in people

walking in off the street. They, after every session they

have to go see their priest to get their throat cut, or

something, you know, it's a crazy business. You know? They

can't have, sometimes only learn about it. They can't have

a session on Saturday because then that's when they go to

see their orthodoptrist or something. And you say, "Who's

this?" And then you find out he goes to a person who puts

his feet in a machine and turns on a bunch of electricity

in order to straighten out the bones.



And this is the general somatic which you've been trying to

handle on the case. So you can get some weird ones going. 

And they are interesting. And you can get very involved with 

these people. But actually he's doing something else, he's 

mixing therapies. That's for sure. But when you find these 

things are out, why you can correct them one way or the other.



But when you get right down to handling the actual C/S of

the run of the mill case, the only thing you're trying to

do is get enough charge off so that it can run the grade,

and then boy, will it make a gain. And there's several ways

you can do that. I haven't enumerated all the ways that you

could do it, but they're equally simple. They're all the

simple idiot order of things. Like you do a little

assessment, you prep check it. You take things like, well

items connected with his profession. Do an L-1 on it. Now

what determines what you do on it is relatively the mood

you're in. You say, actually I'm not gagging with it

because there is a determination on the thing. One of the

reasons you prepcheck the thing as it comes through, one

of the reasons why you prepcheck it as it goes through is

one, the action is easy to do and it's totally unlimited,

and you feel that the item is suppressed or is pushed down.

The reason you do an L-1 is you feel that he's upset about

it or ARC broken concerning it. You got it? There is, there

is a reason behind the two things. I'm giving you a gag, I

should be careful of my gags.



Now. But they're simple things. And they can apply to

anything. Now you've got, in the, there are several things

which have won out well. Trying to pull a missed withhold

by force and duress and so on, is very often, winds you up

in the soup. Very now and then, because you may be going up

against a low TA case, invalidation involved gives you

R/Ses all over the track. Or something dumb like this is

liable to occur. Did it ever occur to you to prepcheck the

missed withholds? They'll come out just the same. You

discharge it to a point where the guy is willing to look at

it, because he's sort of out of valence on the whole subject.



So your best answer to hard to pull missed withholds that

you can't get out, and that sort of thing, your best answer

to it is actually a prepcheck, rather than an auditor

pushing him up against the wall with a pistol. And a prepcheck 

works very well on it.



Your upset conditions are ordinarily best handled with a,

upset conditions are best handled in ordinarily actions,

with an L-1. Or some species of list like an L-1.



It can be handled in two ways. One, while the PC is upset

in the session, it can actually be assessed by general

assessment to one item, which you then give the guy as what

is wrong with him in the session. That actually can be

handled that way. To handle a session ARC break that you

don't seem to be able to get to first base on. That can be

handled that way. And that was actually its' first reason

for design. Couldn't talk to the PC anymore, but you could

still assess it. And you could go tearing down the line,

get the one that was left reading, indicate the by-passed

charge to the PC, and you with just absolute magic, the

pc'll just cool right off. That can be handled that way,

can be handled in auditing with an "On or in sessions

has...", and then just take that line and clear it. Take

the next line and clear it. Take the next line and clear it.



Take the next line and clear it. Those are the two methods

of handling an L-1.



You can always take any list and assess it. Now the one

thing that is adventurous to do is to assess a green form.

That has proven very unsuccessful. A green form is very

successful. It's handled itsa, earlier itsa. On cases that

do not have very many remedy B's or anything like that,

they haven't had S and D, something like this, they are

connected to a suppressive or something, such hatting of

that is best handled by an S and D with a W. with your

withdraws, unmock, stop assessment. Which one is it, and

then you do that remedy B. Now, and that's done by listing

and nulling, of course. I said an S and D. It's done by

just listing and nulling.



Now your remedy B. if environment beads, if a guy hasn't

had too many of them, and so on, your best bet at

environment and so on, is, in actual fact, a remedy B, new

style, and what you've got for your student who can't seem

to dig it, is to find out what the hell subject he's

trying to dig while he's trying to study Dianetics and

Scientology. It works like a bomb. You have to find the

former subject and what is misunderstood in that. In other

words, the study remedy B.



Now you can also take the Dianetics remedy B and you can

run it on an psychologist. And if you're ever gonna teach

him anything you damn well better had. And you handle it

the same way. This doesn't seem to, this hasn't been too

heavily stressed, but you could take "In psychology... ", do

you see? Why, "Who or what's been misunderstood?" Something

like this.



Then you take that item and you're past, but you wait a

minute. We're already handling the guys' past. No, no the

guy's got some earlier subject than psychology. See, there

was some earlier subject already hung him up. So you could

say, "In psychology who or what's been misunderstood?" And

you'd get an item and then that straightens out the subject

for him. A sort of a remedy A with regard to psychology,

you see? Or you could make it a remedy A, and you get

something, and you get an answer, and then you list for the

earlier subject. It was earlier in psychology, and then you

can find out what was misunderstood in that. So there's

several ways you can play this cat. It's all the same

thing, it's all the same action. So that we take a

psychologist, he comes in. He's unable to understand what

we're doing, he can't dig it any way or whatsoever. You can

run a remedy A, as though he's studying psychology. Do you

see? And get his misunderstood off the field of psychology.

And then he can study this. But that didn't work. So you do

the deeper one. Do you understand?



Now, your rule in case supervision simply follows this. Is,

the reality of the case is proportional to the amount of

charge off. You want to undertake, if possible, the

simplest possible action. Undertake the simplest action

available and don't undertake the deeper action until the

simpler action has proven ineffective. And then you've

still got a shot in your locker.



Now the next thing about it is, is all cases going in to

review, or something like that, should be run on some such

formulization as a green form. You'll never find out what's

wrong with him.



But you'd have to teach people to run the whole green form

with no lists, before you could trust them with it.

Otherwise you're gonna run us fabulous numbers of remedy

Bs, fabulous numbers of S and Ds, get into all kinds of

fire fights all over the place. Do you understand? You'll

get over-reviewing, only because there's listing on the

green form. Do you follow? Then you don't ever permit

anybody to ever send anybody over and say what Qual should

do with them. No. Do you understand? I mean, some

organizational executive cannot send the whole staff in for

sea checks. Cannot send the whole staff in for disagreement

checks. Cannot send the whole staff in for, you got it? To

hell with that. 'Cause it causes the case supervisor

infinite trouble. He's got more cases to straighten out now

than you can count. So you've had given too many sec checks.



So therefore, you make it a firm rule that nobody can order

Qual to do anything, and then to do that then you have to

hold Qual to a green form. And then you'll have to force

Qual never to run a green form past an F/N. And then don't

let them list. Because that's the one they'll goof up the

most. And then teach them itsa and eariler itsa.



Anyway, do you see the hang of it, the administration and

the general handling of the case supervisor? (Yes.)

Alright, very good. 



Thank you very much.



**************************************************