CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 16/16 CLASS VIII COURSE PACK CONTENTS: ( Hand = Handwritten materials, transcribed into text files for this posting) Part 16 214. HCOB 14 SEP 71 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS 215. HCOB 18 SEP 69 DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III 216. HCOB 8 JUN 70 SECRET 217. Hand 20 APR 68 IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III 218. HCOB 20 OCT 70 CONFIDENTIAL EP'S 219. HCOB 4 JUL 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs 220. HCOB 15 AUG 83 FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE 221. HCOB 17 AUG 83 LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE 222. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: OT Section III - List of Volcanos 223. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT TWO 224. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT ONE 225. HCOB 2 JAN 70 CONFIDENTIAL - AUDITING BY R3R 226. HCOB 3 JAN 70 SOLO & R3R 227. HCOB 10 NOV 81 OT III AND OT III ATTEST 228. HCOPL 14 JAN 72 THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED 229. HCOB 12 OCT 69 r. 20 Sep 78 LDN OT III RB CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 16/16 214. HCOB 14 SEP 71 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 14 SEPTEMBER 1971 OT III Packs Class VIII's Adv. Case C/S S E C R E T SOLO C/S SERIES No. 7 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS As per HCOB 26 August 1969 "OTIII Case Supervision", ruds go out on BTS. In this respect the following scale based on HCOB 23 August 1971 C/S Series No. 1 "Auditors Rights" is of use to the Solo Auditor: When the ruds go out on BTs during the session the Solo auditor recognizes the following: BT critical = W/H from auditor. BT antagonistic = BPC in session. No TA = Problem. BT sad = ARC Brealk Soaring TA = Overrun or protest; (also more than one BT being run in error or it's a Cluster.) Auditor tired = No sleep or incomplete Inc 1's. Auditor dope off = By-passed FN or not enough sleep Auditor no interest = Out ruds on BTs. A solo auditor who isn't sure what it is but runs into trouble with a BT is smart to end off the session quickly, write down the full observation and get it to the C/S. The Solo auditor who knows what he is looking at as per the above scale (and the C/S the C/ S would give), handles it promptly, BT critical = pull the W/H. BT antagonistic = BPC = assess proper list (such as L1C) and handle. No TA = (or case gain) = Problem = locate the problem and handle. BT sad = ARC Break = locate and handle, itsa earlier itsa. Soaring TA = O/R or Protest (Also more than one BT being run in error or it's a Cluster) = find which and handle. (Running more than the one intended comes from too WlDE an intention.) Auditor tired = no sleep or incomplete Inc 1's = check which it is and handle . Auditor dope off = lack of sleep or BP FN = check on sleep or rehab FN. Auditor no interest = out ruds on BTs = put in ruds. Flag A/Advance Course Supervisor for Training and Services Aide for L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: BW: LR: mo Copyright (c) 1971 By L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 215. HCOB 18 SEP 69 DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1969 OT III Pack Class VIII CONFIDENTIAL DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III After a person has been on OT III for awhile and he is audited by a Dianetic Auditor (who must be a Grade OT II working on OT III or an OT III himself, unless you want to wreck your Dianetic Auditors and break security), certain phenomena develop: It will be found that emotions and somatics etc., will assess as ever without difference on a Health Form. There is no change in this. However, in running, the chain may be found to consist of incidents which are connected with OT III Solo auditing as well as events. Thetans which were not run due to interruptions of Solo III, due to errors by the Solo auditor and incidents in which the pc received BTs as well as impacts making clusters may be encountered. Such auditing can be apparently full of ARC Breaks but only if the Dianetic auditor departs from the Auditors Code or regular procedure. The auditing situation may seem to demand changed commands etc., but the only fallability can occur if the auditor goes non-standard. For Example: The pc cognites he is not running his own incident but a body thetan. This requires only TR 4 as it is only an origin. Acknowledging the fact, the auditor simply goes on. Evaluation by the Auditor can easily and dangerously occur. For example, the pc finds he is relaying the auditing commands to the BT. This would seem to indicate that the auditor changed the wording of R3R to "Have him move ________" or some such alteration. To alter commands is fatal. Soon the pc will find the BT is taking the auditing commands directly and and no change of command was needed. The pc relaying BT comments back to the auditor is only a TR 4 situation unless, of course, the command was wrong or a clarification is requested. Even then the auditor does not go non-standard. The primary Dianetic Auditor error in running one BT on Inc 1 after another is to use ABCD instead of 1, 2, 3, 4. The last BT blew. The new BT hasn't got a date to move to if you just use ABCD. You do 1,2,3,4 on the next BT. You should realize he is a different pc. Running a chain of one emotion or somatic you can get lots of BTs who have a part of that chain. So if one goes down the chain to Inc 1 and blows with an F/N, you may find the same somatic or emotion on a new BT which will run as in any R3R and again get down to an Inc 1. Example: The Solo auditor has not audited for 6 months. He gets a Dianetic session. Assessed is "A feeling of sadness." The Dianetic auditor runs a chain consisting of : 1. An interrupted Solo session. 2. An overrun Inc 2. 3. An Inc 1 to blow and F/N. Now the same item "A feeling of sadness" reads. A chain is run consisting of 1. An interrupted Solo session 2. Where the BT picked up the pc. Blow F/N. Now the same item reads - " feeling of sadness ". A chain is run 1. An overrun on Inc 2 BT. 2. The cluster the BT was in. Blow F/N. Once more "a feeling of sadness" reads. The chain is run 1. An ARC Brk from now getting audited. 2. Inc 2 overrun 3. Inc 1. Blow F/N. The somatic is checked and the item does not read, only F/Ns. So that's all there is to that. Reassess or add to the Health form. __________________ This does not apply to Dianetic preclears. It applys ONLY to Dianetic auditing done on Solo Auditors who are incomplete or overdue or hungup on OT III. __________________ One word of warning. BTs are sometimes not very bright and perceive poorly. The Dianetic auditor whose TR 1 is adequate to a regular Dianetic pc but inadequate to auditing a solo auditor's BTs on a via can cause a lot of ARC Brk, and upset. The BT misses or doesn't hear some of the commands and gets confused if the Dianetic auditor has a too quiet or poorly pronounced TR 1. In auditing a former Solo Auditor on Dianetic auditing, the Dianetic Auditor's TR 1 must be clearly hearable and carefully said. Also, as above, it is easy to mess up on TR 4 and evaluate for the solo-auditor-now-pc "clearing it up by telling him what reads on the meter" etc. __________________ OT III pre OTs got a reputation of being hard to run on Dianetics early in Dianetic re-development. Only five reasons exist for this: 1. A person that high on OT grades audits fast and a comm laggy Dianetic auditor can drive him up the wall. 2. Too quiet or too blurred TR 1. 3. A tendency to evaluate instead of using TR 4. 4. The numerousness of BT chains on the same item (The BTs being separated now) making several chains of the same item which if not all run separately leave the pc ARC Broken with the by-passed charge of unrun BTs. 5. The OT II who is still an OT III and has been on it awhile probably himself has no pictures and all the pictures he has are BT pictures. The lower grade pc (before clear) reacts as a composite being all on one chain, so to speak. He is separared into himself and individual BTs and clusters of them when he gets to OT II and so "audits differently". He easily misowns the pictures, thinking they are his. And the big Blowdowns you get on such a pc's item indicates several BTs have it in common. If a lower grade pc ever got separated out like this, it could be that "he" has several chains of the same item, meaning he has separated BTs. If the Class VIII sees a lower grade pc whose "illness won't recover" he need only have the same items checked that have already been run on the pc and if one gives a BD, get it run again or again and again. But this means this pc was already-chopped up in sessions in some way so that, unknown to the pc (and you don't inform him or her) other BTs than that one run had the same somatic or emotion and only one was run on it. You just leave all items already run on the list and run them again if they read again. If really flat the item briefly F/Ns but you disregard the F/N while assessing in this case. The phenomenon is rare that a lower grade pc has to run more than one chain on the same item. A Solo III, however, will be found to have the same Item on more than one BT in many cases. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:rs Copyright (c) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 216. HCOB 8 JUN 70 SECRET HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstecd, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JUNE, 1970 Issue II Class VIIIs OT IlI Class VIII Checksheet S E C R E T The reason for low TA is unflat OTIII phenomena. If a person has had a low TA in lower grades (see HCOB 8 June, 70, Issue 1) the keynote is take it very easy as auditor and C/S. This applies also to any auditing given on upper OT Levels. That a Pc's TA goes below 2.0 is a certain indicator of unflat OT III. He's still got some. When a person cannot handle OT III he is too much at effect. He cannot project his intention. And so can't run OT III. The new OT I and OT II, particularly OT II, are designed to increase a pc's ability to project his intention to others. If he can't, they overwhelm him and you get low TA or "none on III". Harsh, overbearing auditing or life incidents have to occur, apparently to drive the TA down. Overts, disagreements expressed as obsessive agreement and other lower lovel matters are at the bottom of this in any being. But any "case of low TA" I have ever found has been: (1) Overwhelmed in life; (2) Unable to project intention; (3) Physically inactive; (4) Loaded with BTs; (5) Tends to go out of valence easily . In all this (4) is the important point. The cure is given in HCOB 8 June, 70, Issue 1, and the only thing that this HCO B, Issue II, adds is that it IS (4) above. Endless OT III and Low TA are alike - inability to project intention, pc at effect. Remedy by lightly causing pc to come to cause, to be able to project his intention and thus flatten OTIII. That will complete and finish off low TA. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: dz Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 217. Hand 20 APR 68 IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III (HANDWRITTEN) Include in all original III Packets. 20 Apr 68 IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III III Completion It does not matter whether or not you ran Incident 1 and 2 on self. The End Phenomena of III is getting rid of all body thetans. This does not necessarily include self. If you overrun Ill it will be by trying to get rid of more body thetans than there were or by then, having gotten rid of the others, starting In on self. [in the handwritten original, "getting" in the above paragraph is crossed out and replaced by "having gotten"] So III is COMPLETE for purposes of overrun as above. [complete is underlined rather than capitalized in the handwritten] If you have not done Incident 1 and 2 on self when above is achieved, attest completion and then do 1 and 2 on self. [handwritten has the LRH initial (big H with a bit of an L blended into it) at the bottom] ************** 218. HCOB 20 OCT 70 CONFIDENTIAL EP'S HUBBARD COMMUNICATION OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1970 OT III OT IV CONFIDENTIAL EP'S No BTs left = OT III Exterior = OT IV L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: rr Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 219. HCOB 4 JUL 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JULY 1979 Limited Distribution NED for OTs Auditors AO Review Auditors, OT III ACS Checksheet Class XII C O N F I D E N T I A L HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs When you get a read on a correction list on a Pre-OT who is on OT III or above, you should find out from what area it is reading. i.e. find the position in relation to the body, of the BT or cluster on whom that correction list question read. Otherwise, the reading correction list line gets assigned to all areas, when it only applied to one. This creates BPC as it gives the rest a wrong item or wrong indication, and it makes the reading question appear to be a generality, when in fact it only applied to one BT or cluster. By finding the BT or cluster that the read applied to, the auditor then clears the read on that BT or cluster. And then takes any additional steps to get it to blow and blow it. The above does not apply to cases below OT III and must never be mentioned to such a case. There is a tendency of an auditor trained on general correctlon lists to simply clear the read without finding where it is coming from and as this omission can jam up a case who is on OT III or on NOTs, such auditors when doing NOTs or actions on Pre-OTs OT III or above must learn to handle correction lists in this way. It can mean the difference between failure and success. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: DM: kjm Copyright © 1979 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 220. HCOB 15 AUG 83 FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 AUGUST 1983 AOs OT Review Auditors C/Ses Solo OT III Course and above CONFIDENTIAL FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE ( Ref:HCOB 16 Aug 83 CONFIDENTIAL SOLO C/S Series No. 7 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS HCOB 11 Aug 78 RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS AND PATTER ) Flying rudiments at OT III and above is a piece of tech a Solo Auditor on III must know and be able to use. At this level, when a rudiment is out the Pre OT must be able to determine whose out - rudiment it is - his own, a BT's or that of a cluster. MISOWNERSHIP Scientology axiom 29: "In order to cause an As-is-ness to persist, one must assign other authorship to the creation than his own. Otherwise his view of it would cause it's vanishment." This Axiom is especially relevant to auditing at the level of OT III and above because at this level the Pre OT is handling other being than himself ( BTs and Clusters). Axiom 29 tells us that it is necessary to establish correct ownership of charge in order to get an As-is-ness of the charge. Furthermore, incorrectly assigning charge to the wrong being can cause by-passed charge ( BPC ) as it is now misowned. Hence the instruction in the OT III materials that one must use a narrow attention span so as not to restimulate or confuse other BTs with the one being audited. Finding charge without establishing whose charge it is, and fully handling the charge for that being, can result in a generality - the idea that the charge belongs to all - when it only belongs to one being. This can cause a wrong indication to the others to whom it does not belong. Finding more than one charge without establishing whose charge it is, and fully handling that being, can result in a generality - the idea that the charge found belongs to all - when it only belongs to one being. This can cause an ARC Break or bad reaction as it acts as a wrong indication to the others to whom the charge does not belong. By correctly establishing the ownership of charge, and handling the correct charge on the being to whom it belongs, you get an As-is-ness of the charge. HOW TO FLY THE RUDS The rudiments questions which contain the word "you" (i.e. "Do you have an ARC Break?") are for use on lower level Pcs, but not at OT III or above. When the word "you" is used in a rudiments question on a Pre OT who is OT III or above, it is evaluative. It says whose charge it is. The correct wording of rudiments questions for use by the Solo Auditor on OT III or above is: " Is there an ARC Break ?" " Is there a present time problem ?" " Is there a withhold ?" " Is there an overt ?" and when full ruds are being flown: " Is there an invalidation ?" " Is there an evaluation ?" By using "Is there an/a ________ ?" you are not evaluating whose charge it is. Then the Solo Auditor can establish whose charge it is by asking: " Is ( charge found ) mine? A BT's ? A Cluster's ? and handle which of these read. Note: Sometimes you may find that a charge can belong to and read on more than one of the above, in which case you would handle both reads, one at a time. It is also possible that an ARC Break, for example, could be shared by all present, and that it is the Pre OT's out rud and also a BT's or Cluster's. The question used in this case would be " Is it also ( mine ) ? ( a BT's ) ? ( a cluster's ) ?". When one rudiment has been fully handled, using the steps above, the Solo Auditor continues on down the rudiments questions to the next reading rudiment and handles it as above. EXCEPTION Sometimes the rudiment will run and F/N and blow just on one of the first rudiment questions alone ( such as, " Is there an ARC Break ?" or " Is there a present time problem?", etc. ), and without differentiating whose charge it is. It is possible that the Solo Auditor may not be able to determine whose it is. This is how rudiments run all the time on lower level cases. It just runs generally as the rudiment, without establishing whose it is. The trouble one can get into, however, is misownership, whereby you are running a charge that belongs to a BT as if it were your own ( the Pre OT's ) charge. Or the charge of one BT is misowned as belonging to some other BT or Cluster. When misownership of charge occurs, it won't run or as-is or blow, you can't F/N it, and it will start turning on more mass or solidity. If you get into this sort of situation, narrow enough attention span, sort out whose it is and handle accordingly. But if when flying a rudiment, or other charge found such as a reading line on a prepared list, it just runs and blows, realize you've had a lucky break. Don't interrupt this to try to find out whose it is or try to take it up again after it has blown. This is obvious enough when it happens because as soon as you get onto the reading rudiment or reading line the charge starts coming off and the whole thing F/Ns and blows. This is a special condition and if it doesn't occur you always proceed according to the steps given under "How To Fly The Ruds". RULE Unless you get a discharge and blow of the rudiment as described under "Exception" above, it is essential to find out if any charge found belongs really to the Pre OT himself or to a BT or a Cluster when the charge is found. Don't fly all the ruds, for example, and then ask: " Are all these .... ?" as that would generalize it. The rule is : ON RUDS, OR ON A PREPARED LIST, OR WHEN FINDING A CHARGE ON A CASE, AT ONCE CHECK IF THAT CHARGE BELONGS TO A BT OR CLUSTER, and if so, find where that BT or Cluster is and limit your attention to that specific area when F/Ning the read. And then take any additional steps to blow that BT or Cluster. And blow it. These rules for the Solo Auditor on OT III or above apply when putting ruds in at the start session and apply as well to ruds going out during the session. ( Ref: HCOB 16 Aug 83, CONFIDENTIAL, SOLO C/S Series No. 7, RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS. ) The handling in the later case is the same. CAUTION The ruds question : " Is there a/an .... ?" can be asked of any case, but the remainder of the data in this HCOB does not apply to cases below OT III and must never be mentioned to such a case. SUMMARY Before you begin solo auditing on OT III get this procedure drilled until you can do it smoothly and precisely. With the principle of misownership and As-is-ness understood and the procedure well drilled, flying ruds at OT III and above is a piece of cake. Good auditing! L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: sk Copyright © 1983 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 221. HCOB 17 AUG 83 LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1983 AOs, FSO ONLY Solo OT III C/Ses Solo OT III Course Supervisors Solo OT III Course CONFIDENTIAL LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE The following is a list of all LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERALS which should be in all OT III Course packs. OT III students are to check their packs against this list and ensure all of these handwritten materials are there and have been studied before attesting to completion of either the Study Section or the Auditing Section of the Course. PART TWO: STUDY OF OT III DATA 1. DATA, 3 pages LRH handwriting. 2. 2nd NOTE, INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 5 pages LRH handwriting. 3. 1st NOTE, INCIDENT I, 28 Oct 68, 1 page LRH handwriting. 4. INSTRUCTIONS ( revised 12 Aug 1969 ), 4 pages LRH Handwriting. 5. SECTION III OT, ADDITIONAL SHEET, NOTES ON RUNNING, 2 pages LRH handwriting. 6. 3rd NOTE, RUNNING INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 2 pages LRH handwriting. 7. IMPORTANT NOTE SECTION III, 20 April 69, 1 page LRH handwriting. PART THREE: AUDITING SECTION 1. OT III SECTION, LIST OF VOLCANOES, 1 page LRH handwriting. 2. INCIDENT TWO, 1 page LRH handwriting. 3. INCIDENT ONE, 1 page LRH handwriting. The above-listed materials are modified only by the data contained in HCOB 2 Nov 78R, Rev. 10.12.78, CONFIDENTIAL, URGENT, IMPORTANT, DIANETICS DELETED FROM OT III MATERIALS, and HCOB 2 Oct 68R, Rev., 16 Aug 83, CONFIDENTIAL, OT III. ALL OT III Course materials must be returned to the Advanced Courses Admin at the completion of the OT III Course. Upon return of these materials, the Advanced Courses Admin must check the pack contents against the OT III Course Checksheet to ensure all materials ( LRH handwritten materials, HCOBs and HCO PLs ) have been returned. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: pm: sk Copyright © 1983 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 222. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: OT Section III - List of Volcanos [Handwritten] OT Section III List of Volcanos There were 2 zones of assembly after the thetan was implanted. Thetans of volcanos in Asia and the Pacific were taken to Hawaii. Thetans of Atlantic areas were taken to Las Palmas. Asia and Pacific North Japan Mt. Shasta South Japan San Gorgornio Krakajawia Indonesia Mount Washington Philippines (Alaska) Mount Ranier Himalayas Mount Hood (Hawaii) Andes Atlantic Tangier (Las Palmas) St. Helena Canada Kolomonjero (Kenya) (Spelling not guaranteed) (List may be incomplete) ************** 223. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT TWO [Handwritten Platen] INCIDENT TWO 75,000,000 years ago on this planet. Sometimes capture was on another planet and explosion on this planet, then called Teegeeack. Locate area of explosion. PICTURES of explosion follow. Get original explosion. Effort to stop usually present. H-BOMB DROPPED ON VOLCNO EXPLOSION TERRIFIC WINDS THETAN CARRIED OVER PEAK ELECTRONIC RIBBON CAME UP HE STUCK TO IT IT WAS THEN PULLED DOWN AND HE WAS (AS PART OF A GROUP) IMPLANTED WITH R6 PICTURE OF PILOT SAYING HE IS MOCKING IT UP (R6 materials follow, then DAYS of pictures of God, Devil, etc.) (Thetan usually cognites on pilot or before (or on first incident) and leaves.) ************** 224. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT ONE [Handwritten platen] INCIDENT ONE Occurs at START of track (4 quadrillion years ago). LOUD SNAP WAVES OF LIGHT CHARIOT COMES OUT, TURNS RIGHT AND LEFT CHERUB COMES OUT BLOWS HORN, COMES CLOSE SHATTERING SERIES OF SNAPS CHERUB FADES BACK (RETREATS) BLACKNESS DUMPED ON THETAN Effort to stop must be gotten off (sometimes to hurry). Run as an engram. ************** 225. HCOB 2 JAN 70 CONFIDENTIAL - AUDITING BY R3R HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JANUARY 1970 Class VIII OT III Study Pack CONFIDENTIAL AUDITING BY R3R Elsewhere earlier HCOBs forbade Inc II and Inc I to be run when encountered by a Dianetic auditor on an OT III student. This restriction is lifted. Experience shows they must be run if encountered by a Dianetic Auditor who must be OT III. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH; rs Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 226. HCOB 3 JAN 70 SOLO & R3R HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1970 Issue II AOs Class VIIIs OT III Study Pack R6EW Study Pack CONFIDENTIAL SOLO & R3R DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RUN R3R as a SOLO Action. Tests show that while one occasionally can "get away with it" the practice can be dangerous. Solo Auditing is addressed to specific areas of the mind as given in the auditing materials of R6EW and upwards as issued. One can run Rudiments on oneself successfully with "Itsa earlier Itsa" meaning finding an earlier similar ARC Brk etc. But when one tries to run engrams by R3R on Solo one can run into trouble. When engrams not related to Auditing materials get in one's way on Solo OBTAIN A DIANETICS SESSION from the org. It is also very bad in Solo to wander around the bank looking over various ideas instead of auditing the materials. No org can be responsible for somatics and case upsets occurring because one has departed from the exact regimen given in the materials for Solo Auditing. Get a Review or a Dianetic session from a Dianetic auditor who is OT III or above. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:rs Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 227. HCOB 10 NOV 81 OT III AND OT III ATTEST HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1981 LIMITED DISTRIBUTION OT III & above ONLY AO C/Ses AO Solo C/Ses NOTs C/Ses AO Review Auditors C O N F I D E N T I A L OT III AND OT III ATTEST This issue changes the current handling of OT III and OT II: attests and the next step after OT III. We want to end off "endless III's". Starting now, AO C/Ses are to handle PreOTs on OT III as follows. Let the person audit on OT III as long as he wishes. But at the first slackening or abandonment or EP or if he is just going on and on into "endless III", look for a nice win and tell him that's it and shunt him over to Audited NOTs. An AO Review may be necessary before sending the person to attest. On an "endless III" or some of these people who have been incomplete on OT III or who have been on and off OT III for a long time, a Review would be necessary. The Review could be as short as an LDN OT III and Rehab their best win on OT III or as long as a C/S 53 to F/Ning list followed by an LDN OT III and then Rehab their best win on OT III. On some you might only need to find a nice win they had on OT III and indlcate that that was it, or get it rehabbed in session (this would mainly apply to persons currently on OT III). Some of this termination of III would depend on auditor availability for Audited NOTs, but if this is a situation the solution is to train up more NOTs auditors. The whole intention here is to take PreOTs who have "completed" OT III per the above qualification and shunt them over to Audited NOTs. Let's start maklng OTs in VOLUME. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: DM: kjm Copyright ( c ) 1981 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 228. HCOPL 14 JAN 72 THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 JANUARY 1972 ISSUE I AO's OT III Students For use in Advance Courses Section III and above C O N F I D E N T I A L THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED (Revises HCO PL 1 May, 1968 "Green Green Form") This form is called a "Green Green Form" because it can be done over and over. It is not a Review form. It is an auditing form done on or by the student. The stable datum of awareness and reality is "Reality increase is proportional to the amount of charge taken off the case." NAME:___________________DATE:________________TIME: _________ Name of Auditor (if audited by another) ______________________ One uses these words to see if the subject of the word is hot. Questions can be made up around the word then. Usually one realizes what it is. F/N each read by finding an earlier similar incident if it doesn't F/N in the first place. Do not use to get the TA down. 1. ENVIRONMENT _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 2. ARC Break Find any ARC Breaks. Run them: (a) Date ___________________ (b) Identify what it was ________________________________ (c) Find if it was a break in: i. Affinity ____________________ ii. Reality ____________________ iii. Communication ______________ iv. Understanding _______________ v. Incomplete action cycle ________ vi. Overrun of an action __________ 3. Ignored originations _____________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 4. Missed withold ___________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Who ________________When ________________How _____________ 5. Motivator ________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 6. Overt ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 7. Present time problem _____________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 8. Problem __________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 9. Evaluation _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 10. Invalidation ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 11. False meter read ________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 12. Thetan (BT) overrun _____________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 13. Self overrun ____________________________________________ 14. Grade unflat - Whose?____________________________________ 15. Cluster _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 16. Switched Thetans (BTs) __________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 17. Out of valence __________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 18. Wrong date ______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 19. Wrong item ______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 20. Assertion _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 21. Suppress ________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 22. Invalidate ______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 23. Improperly Audited ______________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 24. Quit ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 25. Didn't leave ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 26. Left ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 27. Came back _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 28. New one _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 29. Nervous _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 30. Not you _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 31. Abused __________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 32. Not-ised ________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 33. Suppressed out of existence _____________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 34. Thinks he's you _________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 35. You think you're another ________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 36. R3R Incomplete __________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 37. Run too many times ______________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 38. Protesting ______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 39. Helping _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 40. Dead ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 41. Animal __________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 42. Bird ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 43 Insect ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 44. Putting them there to run _______________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 45. Still more left _________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 46. Trying not to be ________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 47. Stopped _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 48. Getting too many restimulated ___________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 49. An earlier Inc 1. _______________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 50. (A.) An earlier Inc. 2 __________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 50. (B) Earlier mutual cluster-forming incident. ____________ ___________________________________________________________ 51. Too late on the track ___________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 52. Needs dating ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 53. Needs locating __________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 54. Part done then abandoned ________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 55. Too many incomplete cycles ______________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 56. Misunderstood word ______________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 57. Pretending ______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 58. Lying ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 59. Suppressed hate _________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 60. Love ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 61. Promised never to leave _________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 62. Something else wrong ____________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 63. It was all ok ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Time ___________ TA ___________ Compiled from LRH writings by Advance Courses Supervisor by L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: PS:ne:fmg Copyright (c) 1972 for L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 229. HCOB 12 OCT 69 r. 20 Sep 78 LDN OT III RB HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 12 OCTOBER 1969RB REVISED 25 AUGUST 1975 RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978 Class IV, OT III Auditors AO Review Auditors Class X-XII AO C/Ses (Revised 25 August 1975 and renumbered to delete Question 21 which was not written by me.) (Re-revised 20 September 1978 and renumbered to delete any Dianetic handling - as Dianetics, R3R, or R3RA is forbidden on any Clear or above.) (Revisions not in script.) CONFIDENTIAL SECRET LDN OT III RB This list is for use on a pc who is OT III or above. When an impasse occurs or the pc gets upset, the auditor (who must be an OT III or above) assesses this list and works out from what is found to read, what has gone wrong. DO NOT RUN ANY R3R, R3RA OR ANY DIANETICS LlC can be used on a BT. L7 can be used on a BT. GRADES You can also run Grades O-IV on a BT. OUT INT A BT can be having trouble with Out Int, requiring the End of Endless Int Repair RECALL process (but no R3R). EARLIER INC I, EARLIER UNIVERSE The most common difficulty you get into with a BT that doesn't blow is there was an earlier Inc I , some have several earlier Inc I's, and when you get down to the first Inc I you're liable to jump from one BT to another, if you keep asking for an earlier. And if earlier Inc I doesn't work, then it's "earlier universe?" - the BT recognizes there was an earlier universe - the BT will spot this and blow. (Caution: There is an implant which miscounts the number of earlier universes, making it seem there were far more than there were.) LDN OT III RB PreOT's Name_________________ Auditor_____________________ Date ________________ 1. WAS THERE AN EARLIER INC I? _________ (Some BTs have several earlier Inc I's, the earliest for that BT will run through and blow.) 2. WAS THERE AN EARLIER UNIVERSE? _________ (Get BT to recognize it and it will blow.) 3. JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER BT? _________ (Indicate and handle each BT restimulated. Usually happens when auditor asks for an "earlier" when there was none, or when overrun past an erasure.) 4. IS THIS BEING MOCKED UP AGAIN SO IT CAN BE RUN? _________ (Indicate, if no F/N, D/L when it was mocked up.) 5. ONE INDIVIDUAL WHO THINKS HE IS A CLUSTER? _________ (Handle as an individual.) 6. A CLUSTER WHO THINKS IT IS AN INDIVIDUAL? _________ (Handle as a cluster, D/L, Inc II, Inc I.) 7. THE DATE WAS ACTUALLY FROM A DATE GIVEN IN AN IMPLANT? _________ (Indicate. Find the actual date to blow. Locate to blow.) 8. WRONG DATE FOR INCIDENT? _________ (Correct the date to blow. Locate to blow.) 9. NO DATE WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________ (Date to blow. Locate to blow.) 10. WRONG LOCATION WAS GIVEN FOR INCIDENT? _________ Correct the location to blow, handle individuals.) 11. NO LOCATION WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________ (Locate the incident to blow, handle individuals.) 12. INCIDENT Is GOT INTO RESTIMULATION? _________ (Handle the Inc Is.) 13. EARLIER BEGINNING UNDETECTED? _________ (Find the correct beginning and it will blow.) 14. BYPASSED BASIC ON A CHAIN? _________ (Indicate, if no F/N, D/L.) 15. STIRRED UP INCIDENTS EARLIER THAN BASIC? _________ (Indicate.) 16. MORE THAN ONE CLUSTER IN A CLUSTER? _________ (Handle as a cumulative cluster.) 17. SOMEBODY COPYING WHAT WAS JUST ERASED? _________ (Indicate, if no blow, find out who was copying.) 18. RANDOM PICTURES COMING IN INDICATING A CLUSTER? (D/L the cluster. Inc II, Inc Is.) _________ 19. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY AND DATE A CLUSTER-MAKING INCIDENT? _________ (Identify the incident and handle as a cluster.) 20. JUMPED FROM ONE CHAIN TO ANOTHER? _________ (Indicate. Handle individual BTs.) 21. JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER? _________ (Indicate. Handle both BTs.) 22. ANOTHER BT RESTIMULATED? _________ (Handle the BT.) 23. FALSE TRACK THAT WAS REALLY PART OF AN IMPLANT? (Indicate, if necessary D/L the implant.) _________ 24. BASIC KEEPS REAPPEARING BECAUSE IT IS A CLUSTER? _________ (Handle as a cluster by D/L.) 25. AN EARLIER ERROR MADE? _________ (Find and correct the error.) 26. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE ACTION BEGUN? _________ (Find what action and complete it, but no R3R or R3RA.) 27. LOCATION OF INCIDENT NEEDS ATTENTION? _________ (Locate the incident to blow.) 28. A BT IS PROTESTING? _________ (Handle the protest.) 29. YOU WERE PROTESTING? _________ (Handle the protest.) 30. LEANING ON A WALL? _________ (Indicate-find what the Pre-OT is leaning on.) 31. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS INCORRECT? _________ (Correct the sequence.) 32. INCORRECT OWNERSHIP OF INCIDENT? _________ (Indicate.) 33. RUDIMENTS WERE OUT? _________ (Fly the out Ruds.) 34. A THETAN HAS BEEN INVALIDATED? _________ (Handle the invalidation.) 35. A BT HAS BEEN OVERRUN? _________ (Indicate it to correct BT.) 36. YOU ARE COPYING A BANK YOU USED TO HAVE? _________ (Indicate.) 37. YOU ARE JUST MOCKING UP BTs? _________ (Indicate.) 38. THESE ARE PICTURES OF PAST CLUSTERS? _________ (Indicate.) 39. THERE ARE NO BTs LEFT? _________ (Indicate.) 40. YOU ARE JUST AUDITING COPIES OF BT PICTURES? _________ (Handle copies ) 41. THESE ARE YOUR OWN PICTURES? _________ (Find whose pictures, and blow the BT. If they really were the pc's pictures it would mean s/he wasn't Clear. These will usually turn out to be a BT's pictures misowned.) 42. AUDITING ITSELF IS MAKING A CLUSTER? _________ (D/L the session.) 43. A BT IS HAVING CASE TROUBLE? _________ (Indicate. Handle the BT.) 44. YOU ARE CREATING THE INCIDENT I'S AND BLOWING THEM? _________ (Indicate.) 45. YOU FAILED TO QUIT ON A WIN? _________ (Indicate. Rehab by D/L.) 46. USED TOO WIDE AN INTENTION SPAN? _________ (Indicate. Pick out individuals and handle.) 47. RESTIMULATED MORE THAN WERE BLOWN? _________ (Indicate. Handle restimulated individuals.) 48. ARC BROKE A BT? _________ (Assess BT's ARC Break and handle.) 49. GOT MISEMOTIONAL TOWARD A BT? _________ (Indicate. Find the BT, and handle to blow.) 50. AUDITOR CODE BREAKS ON BTs? _________ (Repair the Code breaks and handle each to blow.) 51. DIDN'T ACKNOWLEDGE A BT? _________ (Indicate. Acknowledge the BT and handle to blow.) 52. DIDN'T BELIEVE A BT OR CLUSTER? _________ (Get off the disbelief, handle the BT or cluster.) 53. A BT WHO HAS AN ARC BREAK? _________ (Handle the ARC Break.) 54. A BT WHO HAS A PTP? _________ (Handle the PTP.) 55. A BT WHO HAS A WITHHOLD? _________ (Pull the withhold.) 56. A BT WHO HAS AN OVERT? _________ (Pull the overt.) 57. OVER-REPAIR? _________ (Indicate.) 58. YOU WEREN'T ALLOWED TO ATTEST? _________ (Indicate. Get off the non-acceptance and any Invalidation.) L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:dm:kjm Copyright © 1969 1975, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** END OF CLASS VIII MATERIALS **************