CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 12/16 CLASS VIII COURSE PACK CONTENTS: Part 12 153. HCOB 5 NOV 68 HOW TO HANDLE THE RESISTIVE CASE 154. HCOB 8 DEC 78 GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF 155. HCOB 30 JUN 71 r. 4 Dec 78 EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD 156. HCOB 1 OCT 69 WHY THETANS MOCK UP 157. HCOB 30 JUN 70 r. 6 Mar 73 VIII ACTIONS 158. HCOB 1 NOV 68 OVERT-MOTIVATOR 159. HCOB 5 DEC 68 UNRESOLVING CASES 160. HCOB 31 AUG 68 WRITTEN C/S INSTRUCTIONS 161. HCOB 1 SEP 68 POINTS ON CASE SUPERVISION 162. HCOB 10 SEP 68 CASE SUPERVISOR - ADMIN IN AUDITING 163. HCOB 11 SEP 68 CASE SUPERVISOR DATA 164. HCOB 17 SEP 68 GROSS CASE SUPERVISION ERRORS 165. HCOB 17 SEP 68 ETHNICS 166. HCOB 17 SEP 68 r. 31 Jan 75 SIX ZONES OF ACTION 167. HCOB 8 OCT 68 CASE SUPERVISOR - FOLDER HANDLING 168. HCOB 6 OCT 70 FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES 169. BTB 8 NOV 72 r. 4 Jun 75 FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES 170. HCOB 2 NOV 68 r. 31 Jan 75 THE BASIC PROCESSES ************************************************** CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 12/16 ************************************************** 153. HCOB 5 NOV 68 HOW TO HANDLE THE RESISTIVE CASE HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1968 Class VIII HOW TO HANDLE THE RESISTIVE CASE The following are the procedures for handling each type of resistive case. Refer 23/9/68 Resistive Cases Issue II (a) If (1) Check and audit the Missing Grades and sub-Zeros. Don't rehab. Just check and then run. Don't do Power after a person is Clear. Clean off false. (b) If (2) Rehab all drugs. Run engrams or chain of taking to F/N. Run engrams or chain of giving to F/N. (c) (3) Run engram or chain of receiving Former Therapy to F/N. Run engram or chain of giving Former Therapy to F/N. (d) (4) Don't handle but do LX1 as Valence shifter is used at OT IV only. (e) (5) Run by Listing and Nulling "What are you trying to prevent?" (f) (6) Ruds, run "In auditing did you have _____?" by itsa earlier similar itsa. (g) (7) Get medical treatment. Then audit engram of it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ldm Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 154. HCOB 8 DEC 78 GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 DECEMBER 1978 Issue II Remimeo Class IV Grad Checksheet Class VI Checksheet Class IV and above Auditors C/Ses GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF GREEN FORM The Green Form is a precision tool which covers the things bugging a case that no other list will detect. It is not intended to correct session errors or cure high or low TA. It specializes in picking up the peculiarities and elements of a pc's life which are out of view in normal auditing and which cause a case to behave unusually. The case may not be particularly resistive, just bugged or not making sense and the Green Form is the list to use to sort it out. It is an excellent C/S tool for getting an estimate of a case and getting it untangled. You can assess it Method 3 and handle, not going beyond the first F/N, when ruds won't fly at the start of session, but its real use is to assess Method 5 and then send to the C/S for programming. If the case appears to be resistive or hasn't sorted out after a full handling of all reading items has been done on the Green Form, then the No. 40 question, called the Resistive Cases Assessment, is assessed Method 5. RESISTIVE CASES Each item on the Resistive Cases Assessment has a corresponding section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD. When an item reads on the Resistive Cases Assessment, you go to the section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD which corresponds (by letter) and assess Method 5 that section. You assess one section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD for each Resistive Cases Assessment item that reads. For example, on the Resistive Cases Assessment, Item C "Audited With Ruds Out" and Item 1-2 "Has Taken Drugs" read. The auditor will now go to the Expanded Green Form 40RD, assess all of Section C "Audited With Ruds Out" and all of Section I "Has Taken Drugs." Then, depending on C/S instructions, the auditor will l) return the folder to the C/S for programming of the case based on the reads he has just gotten or, if he has C/S okay, 2) handle the reads per the instructions given for each reading question. HANDLING READS The sections of the Expanded Green Form 40RD have been arranged in the order in which they are to be taken up if reading. Occasionally an item may read on the Resistive Cases Assessment, but give no reads on the assessment of the appropriate section of the EXGF 40RD. (Example: Section G "Seriously Physically Ill" reads on the Resistive Cases Assessment, but when the auditor assesses Section G on the EXGF 40RD, even after putting in the buttons, there are no reads.) If this occurs, check False and Protest and take the item to an F/N. CLEARS, OTs AND DIANETIC CLEARS The Green Form and especially the Expanded Green Form 40RD call for Dianetic handlings (R3RA) on many items. In using these lists on someone who is Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, NO Dianetic handlings are done on any items, nor is ant activity to be engaged in which brings about further engram running. Where Dianetic handlings are called for on items, there are given additional, special handlings for Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, which consist of indicating the bypassed charge, letting the person tell you about it if he wishes and indicating the F/N. This, of course, cannot be considered a full handling for many items and the Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear should be programmed for NED for OTs as soon as possible to fully handle any areas of case which, due to his case state, are beyond the scope of New Era Dianetics. DRUGS If unhandled drugs are reading, drugs must be fully handled with the NED Drug Rundown as soon as the EXGF 40RD is complete. If a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear is being a resistive case due to unhandled drugs. the answer is to program the person for a Sweat Program and even Objectives. (You do not run engrams.) The Sweat Program and Objectives will handle drugs where they are hanging up a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear. END PHENOMENA Otherwise. unless you have missed a read, you will have handled the resistiveness of the pc's case upon completion of the EXGF 40RD. The Green Form, used by itself, or with the EXGF 40RD will solve cases that no other list will handle. They will get a pc winning who has been making no or slow case gains due to some peculiarity or element of his life or case, and they will do this faster and more easily than ever before. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: jk Copyright © 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 155. HCOB 30 JUN 71 r. 4 Dec 78 EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1971RB REVISED 1 DECEMBER 1974 CANCELS HCOB 3 DEC 71 HANDLING SHEET REVISED 15 FEBRUARY 1977 REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1978 (Revisions not printed in a different type style) Remimeo Class IV Grad Checksheet Class VI Checksheet Class IV Grad and above Auditors C/Ses EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD EXGF 40RD The Expanded Green Form 40RD is used with the Resistive Cases Assessment on a resistive case to precisely locate and solve its resistiveness. The assessment of the resistive cases will direct the auditor to the type of the pc's resistiveness. Further assessment is then done in the section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD appropriate to what has read on the Resistive Cases Assessment and handlings are given for what has been found. This list provides a fast and direct method for solving resistive cases. Before using this list on any pc the auditor must have first checked out on HCOB 8 Dec 78 Iss II GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF. RESISTIVE CASES ASSESSMENT (If this assessment has just been done on the Green Form No. 40 question, it is not repeated. Go right into the Expanded Green Form 40RD assessments.) Assess Method 5 the following resistive cases. If any item reads, go to its corresponding section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD and assess Method 5 all the items in that section. Assess the section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD that corresponds to each reading item. When all sections corresponding to the reading resistive cases items are assessed you will have a full picture of the pc's resistiveness. Then, if you have C/S okay, take up each reading section on the EXGF 40RD in the order in which they are listed below and handle reads per the instructions given. Otherwise, return to the C/S for programming. A-1 WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED _________ A-2 HAD ENGRAMS RUN AFTER BEING DIANETIC CLEAR _________ B DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _________ C AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT _________ D OVERWHELMED _________ E CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _________ F-1 SUPPRESSED _________ F-2 CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON _________ G SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL _________ H HAS NOT HAD AUDITING _________ I-1 SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________ I-2 HAS TAKEN DRUGS _________ J FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY _________ K HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES _________ L-1 OUT OF VALENCE _________ L-2 ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE _________ M PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED _________ N AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _________ O MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING _________ SECTION A-WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED If item A-1 reads, Date/Locate. If item A-2 reads, 2WC to F/N and return to the C/S. SECTION B-DOESN'T WANT AUDITING B-1 DO YOU NOT WANT AUDITING? _________ 2WC to find out why not. It will be an out-rud or an out-list. Handle appropriately. B-2 ARE YOU REFUSING AUDITING? _________ 2WC to find out why. It will be an out-rud or an out-list. Handle appropriately. B-3 ARE YOU PROTESTING AUDITING? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. B-4 DO YOU DISLIKE TALKING TO AN AUDITOR? _________ If so, run "Look at me. Who am I?" to F/N. Then "What could you say?" to F/N. B-5 HAS NO ONE ASKED WHAT YOU REALLY WANT? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. B-6 HAS THERE BEEN ANYTHING WRONG WITH F/NS? _________ Find the fault and handle with false TA HCOBs. Rehab any overruns due to false TA. SECTION C-AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT C-1 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT? _________ Find out which and handle to F/N. C-2 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? _________ ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. C-3 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A PROBLEM? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. C-4 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A WITHHOLD? _________ What was the withhold? Who missed it? E/S to F/N. C-5 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN OVERT? _________ What was the overt? E/S overt to F/N. C-6 ARE YOU LYING TO PEOPLE? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. C-7 DO YOU HAVE SECRETS? _________ 2WC what secrets E/S to F/N. C-8 ARE YOU HERE FOR REASONS NOT DISCLOSED? _________ If so, L&N "What was your original reason for coming here?" R3RA Triple or Quad if an evil purpose. Program for EX DN. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, do the L&N step only.) C-9 DO YOU HAVE AN EVIL PURPOSE? _________ L&N "What evil purpose do you have?" R3RA Triple or Quad. Program for EX DN. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, do the L&N step only.) SECTION D-OVERWHELMED D-1 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY AUDITING? _________ Run out the incident of overwhelm R3RA Narrative Triple or Quad. (On Flow 1, acknowledge what the pc says and continue with R3RA Narrative commands 2-9 A-EYE.) F2: Return to the time you caused another to be overwhelmed by auditing and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others caused others to be overwhelmed by auditing and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you caused yourself to be overwhelmed by auditing and tell me when you are there. ( Progress Program . ) (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear 2WC for data and use the appropriate correction list to locate and indicate the bypassed charge ) D-2 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY LIFE? _________ Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "by life." (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on Clears and above. D-3 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY FAMILY CONNECTIONS? _________ Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "by family connections." (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on Clears and above. D-4 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED ON YOUR POST? _________ (ON YOUR JOB?) Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "on your post" or "on your job" whichever is appropriate and has read. (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on Clears and above. D-5 ARE YOU RESTIMULATED IN YOUR CURRENT ENVIRONMENT? _________ Run out the time he felt restimulated in his environment R3RA Narrative Triple or Quad. (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on Clears and above. SECTION E-CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY E-1 ARE YOU CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY? _________ L&N "What are you trying to prevent?" R3RA Triple/Quad preventing (item). 2WC committing continuous overts and pull them, E/S to F/N. On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear the handling is: L&N "What are you trying to prevent?" 2WC committing continuous overts and pull them, E/S to F/N. E-2 DO YOU KEEP ON GOOFING? _________ Handle as in E-1. E-3 ARE YOU COMMITTING CONTINUOUS OVERTS IN LIFE? _________ Handle as in E-1. SECTION F-SUPPRESSED CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON F-1 ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE HOSTILE OR ANTAGONISTIC TO SCIENTOLOGY? _________ PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling. F-2 ARE OTHERS ANTAGONISTIC TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING? _________ PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling. F-3 HAVE YOU BEEN SUPPRESSED BY ANOTHER? _________ 2WC to F/N. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling. F-4 DO YOU MAKE GAINS AND THEN LOSE THEM? _________ PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling. F-5 DO YOU RECEIVE GAINS OR BENEFITS FROM BEING ILL OR DISABLED? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S. SECTION G-SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL G-1 ARE YOU SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL? _________ 2WC to find out what the illness or symptoms are. Return the folder to the C/S. Program per HCOB 24 Jul 69R SERIOUSLY ILL PCs and BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-2 IS YOUR BODY ILL? _________ 2WC "What seems to be wrong with your body?" to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-3 ARE YOU MENTALLY ILL? _________ Handle as a withhold. E/S "Is there an earlier time you were mentally ill?" to F/N. R3RA Narrative Triple/Quad. Then do a full preassessment on it. G-4 DO YOU HAVE ANY BROKEN BONES? _________ 2WC to F/N. Medical treatment followed by a program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES G-5 DO YOU HAVE ANY INFECTIOUS DISEASE? _________ 2WC to get the data on what it is to F/N. Medical treatment followed by a program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-6 DO YOU HAVE ANY HIDDEN ILLNESSES? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-7 DO YOU HAVE ANY TOOTH DECAY? _________ 2WC to F/N. Dental treatment followed by a program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES G-8 DO YOU HAVE ANY PHYSICALLY DAMAGED PARTS? _________ 2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-9 DO YOU HAVE ANY BODY PARTS MISSING? _________ 2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. G-10 HAVE YOU HAD ANY BODY PARTS REMOVED? _________ 2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. SECTION H - HAS NOT HAD AUDITING H-1 HAVE YOU NOT HAD AUDITING? _________ L&N "Who or what would prevent auditing?" Triple or Quad ruds and overts on the item. H-2 HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING? _________ 2WC to find out when the pc first started self-auditing. Do an L1C on the prior upset. If the prior upset was in auditing, use the appropriate correction list. H-3 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED IN AN EARLIER LIFE? _________ 2WC to F/N. C/S to program to handle any overrun or other difficulties with past auditing, if needed. SECTION I - SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS HAS TAKEN DRUGS I-1 ARE YOU SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you were seeking the same thrill attained from drugs?") Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, indicate the item. Do no further handling.) I-2 HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. If pc has had his Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-1.) I-3 DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO TAKE DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. If pc has had his Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in 1-1.) I-4 HAVE YOU NEVER TAKEN DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you never took drugs?") I-5 ARE YOU CURIOUS ABOUT DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you were curious about drugs?") I-6 HAS MEDICINE ACTED AS DRUGS? _________ 2WC to F/N. If pc has had a Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if needed. Advance Program to handle all reading drugs, medicine and alcohol with a full Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-1.) I-7 HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________ 2WC to F/N If pc has had a Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-l.) SECTION J-FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY (If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes, and indicate the F/N. Do no further handling.) J-1 HAVE YOU HAD A FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on having a former therapy. F1: Return to the time you had a former therapy and tell me when you are there. F2: Return to the time you gave a former therapy to another and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others gave a former therapy to others and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you gave a former therapy to yourself and tell me when you are there. J-2 HAVE YOU HAD MEDICAL THERAPY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "medical therapy." J-3 HAVE YOU HAD PSYCHIATRIC THERAPY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "psychiatric therapy." J-4 HAVE YOU HAD PSYCHOLOGY THERAPY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "psychology therapy." J-5 HAVE YOU HAD DENTAL THERAPY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "dental therapy." J-6 HAVE YOU HAD ELECTRIC SHOCK? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for okay to run out the electric shock Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, followed by a preassessment of the electric shock. SECTION K-HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES (If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes, and indicate the F/N. Do no further handling.) K-1 ARE YOU CURRENTLY DOING ANY BODY PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on body practices. F1: Return to the time you took part in body practices and tell me when you are there. F2: Return to the time you caused another to take part in body practices and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others caused others to take part in body practices and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you caused yourself to take part in body practices and tell me when you are there. K-2 ARE YOU CURRENTLY DOING ANY EXERCISES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "exercises." K-3 ARE YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICING ANY RITES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "rites." K-4 ARE YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICING YOGA? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "yoga." K-5 DO YOU HOLD ANY EASTERN BELIEFS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "eastern beliefs." K-6 ARE YOU DOING ANY MENTAL EXERCISES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "mental exercises." K-7 DO YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICE MEDITATION? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "meditation." K-8 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER PRACTICES BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier practices before Scientology." K-9 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER RELIGIONS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier religions." K-10 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER RITES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier rites." K-11 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EXERCISES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier exercises." K-12 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN HYPNOTISM? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "hypnotism." K-13 HAVE YOU HELD EASTERN BELIEFS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "eastern beliefs." K-14 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER INDOCTRINATIONS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier indoctrinations." K-15 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER SCIENTIFIC PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier scientific practices." K-16 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER ELECTRONIC PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier electronic practices." K-17 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER THOUGHT PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier thought practices." K-18 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER SPIRITUAL PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier spiritual practices." K-19 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EASTERN RITES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier eastern rites." K-20 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EASTERN PRACTICES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier eastern practices." K-21 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER IMPLANTING TECHNIQUES? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier implanting techniques." K-22 HAVE YOU PRACTICED WITCHCRAFT? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on practicing witchcraft. F1: Return to the time you had witchcraft practiced on you and tell me when you are there. F2: Return to the time you practiced witchcraft on another and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others practiced witchcraft on others and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you practiced witchcraft on yourself and tell me when you are there. K-23 HAVE YOU CAST SPELLS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on using spells. F1: Return to the time a spell was used on you and tell me when you are there. F2: Return to the time you used a spell on another and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others used spells on others and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you used a spell on yourself and tell me when you are there. K-24 ARE YOU DOING SOME EXERCISE BETWEEN SESSIONS? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "exercises." SECTION L-OUT OF VALENCE ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE If items L-l or L-2 read, the handling is LX3, LX2, LX1 and 220H if necessary. Ref: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS HCOB 5 Nov 69RV LX3 (ATTITUDES) HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX2 (EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST) HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX1 (CONDITIONS) HCOB 20 Sep 78 II LX LIST HANDLING (If one of these items read on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes, and indicate the F/N. Do no further handling.) SECTION M-PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED (If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes, and indicate the F/N.) M-1 ARE YOU PRETENDING? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending. F1: Return to the time another pretended to you and tell me when you are there. F2: Return to the time you pretended to another and tell me when you are there. F3: Return to the time others pretended to others and tell me when you are there. F0: Return to the time you pretended to yourself and tell me when you are there. M-2 ARE YOU PRETENDING TRAINING NOT ATTAINED? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1. M-3 ARE YOU PRETENDING ATTAINMENTS IN LIFE NOT REALLY ATTAINED? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1. M-4 ARE YOU PRETENDING GRADES NOT ATTAINED? _________ Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1. SECTION N - AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT N-1 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT? _________ 2WC to find out what grades the pc feels are out. Indicate it. If no F/N, "Is there an earlier time you were audited over that/those outgrade(s)?" Note for C/S. N-2 IS YOUR DIANETICS INCOMPLETE? _________ 2WC to F/N. Note for C/S. N-3 DO ENGRAMS FAIL TO ERASE? _________ L3RF Rundown. (R-Factor: "We are looking for engrams contacted in your early auditing and not fully handled." Assess L3RF Method 5 with the preface "In your early Dianetics ?" Handle with R3RA over and over until the entire list F/Ns ) (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the read If no F/N you may do an L3RF if needed, however do no handling beyond indicating the reading questions, to F/N.) N-4 IS YOUR COMMUNICATION GRADE OUT? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade 0 N-5 IS YOUR PROBLEMS GRADE OUT? _________ 2WC to F/N Program for Expanded or Quad Grade I. N-6 IS YOUR OVERT/WITHHOLD GRADE OUT? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade II. N-7 DO YOU HAVE PERSISTING ARC BREAKS? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade III. N-8 ARE YOU ANXIOUS ABOUT CHANGE? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade III. N-9 DO YOU HAVE SERVICE FACSIMILES? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV. N-10 DO YOU HAVE FIXED IDEAS? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV. N-11 ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT BEING RIGHT OR WRONG? _________ 2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV. N-12 HAVE YOU FAILED TO ATTAIN OTHER GRADES? _________ 2WC to F/N. Note for C/S. N-13 HAVE WINS ON GRADES BEEN BYPASSED? _________ Rehab each to F/N. SECTION O-MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING O-1 HAVE YOU HAD MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING? _________ Find and clear the misunderstoods or do a WCCL prefaced with "In auditing." Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed. O-2 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING WHAT WAS GOING ON IN A SESSION? _________ Clear this up with Word Clearing on the action that wasn't understood. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed. O-3 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING AN AUDITOR? _________ 2WC to F/N. Handle any MUs with Word Clearing on the area the pc didn't understand. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed. O-4 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE IN AUDITING BECAUSE OF MISUNDERSTOODS? _________ Find the misunderstoods and clear them up. Note what actions were done over misunderstood words and handle with the proper repair list if needed. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: jk Copyright © 1971, 1974, 1977, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 156. HCOB 1 OCT 69 WHY THETANS MOCK UP HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1969 OT VIII SECRET WHY THETANS MOCK UP This question has been the most plaguing one in Dianetics and Scientology. This question has been the most plaguing one in history of Clearing. The ONLY way a thetan ever gets into trouble, the ONLY way he can get trapped or become part of a cluster is by mocking up and making pictures of bad experiences. And why record all bad experiences? This too is not good sense. One can explain it by saying that thetans become bored and have "a yearning for event or excitement" or that thetans mock up pictures as an aberrated form of "havingness." Other ways can be invented to explain why thetans compulsively mock up bad pictures, but these do not factually lead to a total solution to the compulsion. The real reason stems from a basic characteristic of thetans and that is "a thetan never totally gives up." There is, seemingly, a streak of resistance or resentment that makes a thetan wish to persist in the same place or location. If he cannot, he will do so covertly. The definition of "power" is "the ability to hold a position in space." All power comes from the ability to occupy a point. In an electrical generator the base that separates two terminals must be firm or there will be no exchange of energy or power generated. The effort to weaken a thetan is to make him relinquish his point in space. Covertly or overtly a thetan seeks to assert his position in space. If he cannot do so overtly, he does so covertly or mentally. When a thetan is moved unwillingly from a point or position he even then refuses to give up that point and begins MOCKS IT UP mentally. He also mocks up the events of his departure as a part of the action of mocking up the point he is leaving. This, unwittingly, gives him a picture, an engram. Now let us see if this theory holds true in practice. A. Just ahead of any engram there must be an effort to retain a position and there must be a point or location thetan mocked up. This is true. You can blow an engram without running it by spotting its first point in space and time. In a secondary, "where did you first hear of the loss?" is a vital question. B. In a contact assist getting a person to touch again the point where he was hurt with what was hurt will blow the engram. C. Getting a person to locate areas (locations) that are not safe produce blows of engrams without running them. D. Exact and accurate dating sometimes blows an engram. Those times when it does not, it should blow when the location is exactly spotted. E. Implants and traps were done mainly to keep Thetans out of an area. The Thetan, resenting and resisting, mocks up the place anyway and so implants himself. A thetan too easily substitutes a mental mock up for a point in the real universe. One could also say that a thetan, by mocking up, warns himself against certain points in space or areas in the physical universe. Anxiety is solely not thetan able to be certain places and not thetan able to be where one is, either. Making people leave is the most unpopular action unless one also frees them to be anywhere. Transferring people is a degrading thing to do to them. Jail denies a thetan all spaces except where he has been placed; note that thetans are made very miserable in jail. Jailing is a sure way to make confirmed criminals and also to make them crazy as well. Any thetan, stuck in an engram, is asserting the effort to be at and hold the point where he was hit at the beginning of that engram. An engram therefore is a refusal to leave a place at which force was exerted to drive one away. Reversely, one can refuse to be held at a place where one does not wish to be but this is a negation of a place, a not-is of it and its time. Power of choice over where one is and where one is not is thus a key to engrams. Finally - a thetan mocks up because he covertly refuses to abandon a location under duress and not-ises the place where he does not wish to be but must. Using these facts one can blow engrams without running them. Some sample questions: "What point (location) is unsafe?" "What location could you have held absolutely?" "Where did you first get an intimation of danger?" "What place would you rather not be in?" "What effort would it take to hold (that) (a) location?" Working with this you will see a door open to a higher level than Dianetic R3R. But realize that it is only for a high level thetan. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH: rs Copyright (c) 1969 By L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 157. HCOB 30 JUN 70 r. 6 Mar 73 VIII ACTIONS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1970R (Revised 6 March 73. Changes on following three pages in this type style.) Remimeo C/S Series 13R VIII ACTIONS (GF 40, IV Rundown, VIII Case Supervision.) Inevitably, when any new approach or process is released, some will instantly assume that all "older" (actually more basic) data has been cancelled. There is no statement to that effect. It is not guessed that this will be assumed and so we could lose an entire subject. We did in fact lose Dianetics for a decade and all but lost Scientology in the following ten years. A subject can be reorganized and made more workable. That was done in 1969 for Dianetics. BUT IT HAD NEVER BEEN UNWORKABLE! The 1969 Dianetics Reorganization refined the 1962-63 discoveries of R-3-R. A better communication was made to the user and the preclear. Amazingly, the reissue of Dianetics as Standard Dianetics caused about a dozen people (even in high places unfortunately) to at once assume that Dianetics wiped out any need for Power, Scientology Clearing or anything else! Even an unauthorized Policy Letter (not signed by me) and an HCO B (also not signed by me) gave this impression. They were of course cancelled the instant they were discovered to have been sent out. This idea that the "old" is always cancelled by anything "new" has its root in the idea that a later order cancels earlier orders, which is true. But orders are one thing and Tech basics another. What if, in the science of physics, a book by Professor Glumph came out, omitting the three laws of motion and gravity. It is assumed then that Newton's laws are no longer valid. Because they are old. (Newton lived between 1642 and 1727.) So some young student engineer is baffled because bridges have weight and can't work out gravity or motion! And he and his fellows begin to build without knowing these laws and there goes the whole of engineering and the culture itself! This is no fantasy. As a college student in upper math I was utterly baffled by "calculus". I couldn't find out what it was for. Then I discovered it had been developed by Sir Isaac Newton, examined the basics and got the idea. My college text omitted all the basic explanations and even the authorship of the subject! Calculus today is really not enough used because it isn't understood. Anyway, here's the main surprise: Until 1970 the whole of Scientology was never in use in processing! Students had ridden along with the research line up into the OT sections, discarding the ladder behind them. For nearly 3 years an increasing proportion of preclears were not actually making it. The gradient to get them onto the bridge had been neglected as "old" when in fact they were not "old" but BASIC. The amazement of auditors (and their delight) when the HCO B on Auditor's Rights (C/S Series 1) was released indicated that they had become "process oriented" with all the WHY gone. VIII AUDITING The 1968 VIII Standardization aimed actually at good TRs, auditing presence, and basics in auditor performance. VIII auditing was developed to handle the OT band. It is entirely valid. Its only omission was detailed actions now developed as to how to handle a pc or Pre OT who had been pulled up the line and had fallen on his head. Out Grades was spotted and discussed in detail in VIII auditing. Giving lower grades fast was the only error. It was not realized in 1968 that End Phenomena of lower grades was not being required. The re-release of the entire band of Academy and Saint Hill materials in 1970 is a re-emphasis on the validity and necessity of using it ALL on pcs! And in understanding the mind and life! And all this is quite welcome and very successful. Not noticed is that this whole band was never before presented for full use on all pcs. As I say, 1950-1969 auditors had been riding with the "newest and latest" because it was "popular". Only a few wise old-timers continued to use the most basic actions. But just as VIII auditing was an unauthorized signal to suppress all that had been known before, so now, with the full release for use of Expanded Lower Grades, a few began to say that VIII auditing was now "old"! One assumes then that some like to be able to say that something is now "old". Has a superior sort of ring to it, I guess. Anyway we'd better disregard this tendency to retire basics. It is more amusing than otherwise. So let's get on with the job. RESISTIVE CASES The RESISTIVE CASE rundown is an VIII development TO HANDLE THOSE WHO CANNOT MAKE THE GRADES. It was put into the Green Form as GF 40 so as to preserve it. To it could now be added "Overwhelmed". This would indicate need of Repair (Progress) and Return (Advance) Programs. But many other indicators exist already. So when do you use a GF 40? Let us say the pc has been run on Grade Zero. And at the Examiner cannot or does not attest. One would first look for simple auditing errors in recent sessions. These would get reviewed and corrected. One would then look for lower actions than Grade Zero that had been missed. If it still seemed hard to figure out, one would use a GF 40, Resistive Cases. In essence, if one adds "Overwhelm" to the GF 40 list you have on it all the reasons a pc won't advance IF he has been run on all processes up to that point. Overwhelm would indicate need of a Repair and Return. Grade I, Problems, is the usual ordinary reason for no case advance. Problems shows up as an out-rud in GF 40 and is simply put in as a rud not as a grade. But if a Grade II or above has a Problem??? That means Grade I is out. GF 40 remains even more plainly as a "When all else fails". It is used that way. When a pc doesn't attest, and all has been done for him otherwise, you use a GF 40. This was its proper use in the first place. All such materials except Rapid or Quickie Grades are valid. And (joke) these remarks on GF 40 Resistive Cases do not wipe out "Repair and Return Programs". IV RUNDOWN The so-called IV Rundown as taught on the VIII Course is of course quite valid. Originally developed to catch cases that had somehow gotten up to OT III and were falling on their heads, it is a collection of actions. It salvaged many cases. The missing datum was that in recent times these cases were falsely reported to have had their lower grades. THEY, the cases themselves, said they had "had lower grades". This made a mystery. The fact is, with multiple declare (declaring 0 to IV to the Examiner all at one time mostly without any mention of End Phenomena of the grade) these cases were OUT GRADE in the extreme. The IV Rundown was an effort to catch it all up to make a real OT. "Out Grades" didn't read as it didn't mean anything to the pc and besides "they'd all been rehabbed a dozen times anyway". But nobody mentioned never having attained any End Phenomena and the Class Chart was never really gotten IN IN IN in the first place. You will find many pcs have had various parts of the "IV Rundown" run earlier. For a while it was the fashion to use the IV Rundown or a part of it on any balky case at any level. At OT IV (which was an audited step and none of it really confidential) the C/S simply ordered run whatever was left of it not already run. Somewhere on the case all of the IV Rundown still should be run. But of course that would now be on a Return (Advance) Program and well up the line. If Repair-Return doesn't get a grade made this is the time to do a IV Rundown. On (3) Valence Shifter-LX1, LX2, LX3 lists can be done in triple, recall, secondary, engram. Earlier Practices, Former Therapy can also be triple, recall, secondary, engram. This is on Page 28 (not 23) of the original VIII Case Supervisor Manual and part of it is also now GF 40. If a case really needs this he won't be making a lower grade really so the GF 40 or its slightly wider OT IV Rundown can be used. To both, "Overwhelmed by auditing" should be added in any future issue to indicate a needed repair action. CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS HCO B 10 Dec 1968, "Case Supervisor Actions" Confidential, VIIIs only, is still valid. It remains Confidential as it mentions some OT phenomena that would spin a Grade Va. However, some VIII C/S is going to be told that "Expanded Lower Grades changes all that". It doesn't. Listen: In the next to last paragraph of the cover page of this manual (HCO B 10 Dec 68) it says: "Standard Grades are not part of this set-up AS IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE AUDITOR KNOWS THESE. Directions to do Standard Grades are written on a blank sheet." (I have added the block letters for emphasis here.) At the time this was written I had not discovered that Lower Grades were gone out of use and I let be published Triple Grades which seemed to condense all lower grades. The Major Process or Major Grade Process is definitely not enough to make a pc make a lower grade. I am sorry I gave any support at all to such an idea by not examining the whole scene when it began to show up. / did find it and did correct it however when auditing statistics over the world showed the fault. (28 hours was the total weekly delivery of orgs!) If you add the dozens and dozens of Lower Grade Processes as given in Expanded Lower Grades to the VIII C/S HCO B of 10 Dec 68 and included this C/S Series and its new development of Repair (Progress) and Return (Advance) programs you would have the whole package of C/Sing. So the VIII actions are all valid. Auditor classes below VIII have this C/S Series. The AO C/S Course adds in the VIII actions as well. Any C/S who does not know well The Original Thesis, Dianetics: The Evolution of a Science, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, Scientology 8-80 and Scientology 8- 8008 will go badly astray. It is vital to know these books and others in this area, to know what one is trying to handle. Class VI (SHSBC) tapes and bulletins are all valid and vital to Lower Grade auditing and C/Sing. ------------- I trust this gives the C/S some idea of what is still "in". It all is. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: dz.nt.rd Copyright © 1970, 1973 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 158. HCOB 1 NOV 68 OVERT-MOTIVATOR HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1968 Issue II Class VIII OVERT-MOTIVATOR DEFINITIONS These are problems in FLOWS. They exist with or without intention. One can add "intentional" or "unintentional" to the definitions. An OVERT-An act by the person or individual leading to the injury, reduction or degradation of another, others or their beingness, persons, possessions, associations or dynamics. A MOTIVATOR is an act received by the person or individual causing injury, reduction or degradation of his beingness, person, associations or dynamics. An overt of omission-a failure to act resulting in the injury, reduction or degradation of another or others or their beingness, persons, possessions or dynamics. A motivator is called a "motivator" because it tends to prompt an overt. It gives a person a motive or reason or justification for an overt. When a person commits an overt or overt of omission with no motivator he tends to believe or pretends that he has received a motivator which does not in fact exist. This is a FALSE MOTIVATOR. Beings suffering from this are said to have "motivator hunger" and are often aggrieved over nothing. Cases which "cave in hard" suffer from false motivators and resolve on being asked for overts done for no reason. Cases which do not resolve on actual motivators have overts that have to be handled. There is also the case with FALSE OVERTS. The person has been hit hard for no reason. So they dream up reasons they were hit. Cases that go into imaginary cause (imagining they do or cause things bad or good) are suffering from false overt . They resolve on "When were you hit (punished, hurt, etc.) for no reason?" L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 159. HCOB 5 DEC 68 UNRESOLVING CASES HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 DECEMBER 1968 Class VIII UNRESOLVING CASES The mechanism of PTS is environmental menace that keeps something continually keyed-in. This can be a constant recurring somatic or continual, recurring pressure or a mass. The menace in the environment is NOT imaginary in such extreme cases. The action can be taken to key it out. But if the environmental menace is actual and persists it will just key-in again. This gives recurring pressure unrelieved by usual processing. In this event one can compare the environmental menace (by finding it, listing, 2-way comm etc.) and one will then find the incident or incidents being keyed-in are exactly similar in all respects or are thought so. These can be run out as secondaries or engrams. Theoretically an environmental continual overt would do the same thing. In which case the secondary or engram would match it. This is in fact the only engrams that will run and erase on a PTS case. Personal roller-coaster has this as its source. The person does not see or associate the two. This is why the PTS case does not respond to processing and gives a way for it to respond. This is also why the sick and insane do not respond. It is the same mechanism. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:bw Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 160. HCOB 31 AUG 68 WRITTEN C/S INSTRUCTIONS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 31 AUGUST 1968 Remimeo Case Supervisor Hat WRITTEN C/S INSTRUCTIONS It is a High Crime for a Case Supervisor not to WRITE in a preclear's folder what the case supervised instructions are and a High Crime for an auditor to accept verbal C/S instructions. To commit this crime causes: 1. Extreme difficulty when doing a folder error summary as there is no background of what was ordered and why. 2. Gives the auditor leave to do anything he likes as not in writing. 3. Is open to misduplication and can cause squirrel processes to be run and so mess up a preclear with Non-Standard Tech. Any C/Supervisor found guilty of this from this date is to be removed as this could only be considered a deliberate attempt to mess up preclears. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 161. HCOB 1 SEP 68 POINTS ON CASE SUPERVISION HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII POINTS ON CASE SUPERVISION 1. Check your orders to find out if auditor did them. 2. Check to see if commands correct and if pc's reaction was expected reaction for those commands. 3. Check any list and find out if there was mislisting. 4. Advise against a background of Standard Tech. 5. Order any errors corrected or get the case on further up the grades. 6. Beware of over-correction. 7. Beware of false, pessimistic or over-enthusiastic auditor reports. They are detected by whether the case responded to usual actions as they all do. 8. Beware of talking to the auditor or the pc. 9. Have implicit confidence in Standard Tech. If it is reported not working the auditor's report is false or the application terrible but not reported. 10. Above all else hold a standard and NEVER listen to or use unusual solutions. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 162. HCOB 10 SEP 68 CASE SUPERVISOR - ADMIN IN AUDITING HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII CASE SUPERVISOR ADMIN IN AUDITING A Case Supervisor cannot do a decent job of C/S when he is presented with lousy admin such as-no Auditor Report Forms, not handling Gr Form reads as they occur, not writing in F/Ns, not making a ring around the item found, not indicating where a list was extended. Also illegible writing, failure to go over a report when done and make obscure words plain in print is a NO REPORT and gets liability. When you run into a snag you can't handle, DON'T start inventing tech and doing something else other than the C/S instructions. End off the session and send it to the Case Supervisor. It is, I am told, the wild fashion in Quals and HGCs around the world that if one hits a snag, the auditor rushes out and asks the D of P who gives him an unusual solution without even looking at a folder. If I catch or hear of anyone doing that, it's the Deep 6. The CORRECT action and the ONLY correct action is to end the session and get folder and session paper to a Case Supervisor, who (I) does not see the pc and (2) does not talk to the auditor. Case Super is folder ONLY. Then there's a chance of standard tech. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH :jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 163. HCOB 11 SEP 68 CASE SUPERVISOR DATA HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII CASE SUPERVISOR DATA A Case Supervisor should watch for the Ethics record of Pcs who have been C/Sed. If they fall on their head, get into low conditions, the folder should be reviewed. Most probably the auditor did not do what was ordered and if folder looks okay, chances are the auditing report is false as SOMETHING IS WRONG or Pc would not be in trouble. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH :jp:de Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 164. HCOB 17 SEP 68 GROSS CASE SUPERVISION ERRORS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII C/S GROSS CASE SUPERVISION ERRORS 1. Ordering unnecessary repairs. 2. Trying to use repair processes to get case gain instead of getting the pc onto the next grade. 3. Not writing down C/S instructions, but giving them to an auditor verbally. 4. Talking to the auditor re the case. 5. Talking to pc re his case. 6. Falling to send pc to examiner if you're unsure why his folder has been sent up 7. Being reasonable. 8. Not having enough Ethics presence to get his orders followed. 9. Issuing involved repair orders. 10. BIGGEST GC/SE for C/S is not to read through the pc folder. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH :jp.ts Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 165. HCOB 17 SEP 68 ETHNICS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII C/S ETHNICS A Case Supervisor must watch Ethnics (customs) oddities and changing fashions because one race has different mores than another and changing fashions bring in new methods of degradation, i.e. Drug Rehab was not necessary in 1950, but is vitally necessary in 1968. Sex was not a button in Ancient Greece and is the total subject of Freudian analysis in 1894. For the 1930 period, C/S would have to pay attention to rehabbing periods of time pc went "release" when drinking. What you are looking for and what must be handled is euphoria caused by some external stimuli. This not only may be but must be rehabbed in many cases before they even begin to move. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 166. HCOB 17 SEP 68 r. 31 Jan 75 SIX ZONES OF ACTION HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1968R REVISED 31 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo Class VIII SIX ZONES OF ACTION There are 6 zones of action in Class VIII: 1. Auditing for Grades "obtains real case gain". 2. Repair of misaudited Grades. 3. Setting up cases to run a Grade. 4. Case Supervising the auditing of Grades. 5. Case Supervising the repair of misaudited Grades. 6. Case Supervision of setting up cases to audit Grades. Each of these is a separate skill and must be learned. Each has its precise and invariable actions and these must be learned. There are no others. A student's reality must be able to embrace that there are no others. His grip on tech must be so exact that he doesn't flub Standard Tech and so begin to look for unusual solutions in any of the six above actions. A good C/S is bound by the Case Supervisor's Code and a good C/S does not use 2 (two) or 5 (five) above as an excuse to give assists. Assists have no part in Class VIII skills which depend wholly on the grades for case advance. A pc released at Zero will of course soon begin to have problems. He goes to the next grade, not to Review for an assist. No one grade solves the whole case. That's why there are grades. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rs.nt jh Copyright © 1968, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 167. HCOB 8 OCT 68 CASE SUPERVISOR - FOLDER HANDLING HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 OCTOBER 1968 Remimeo Case Supervisor Hat CASE SUPERVISOR - FOLDER HANDLING Analyzing Folders Go back in the folder to the session where the Preclear was running well and come forward from it doing a folder error summary. Reviewing Folders In reviewing a folder, the first thing to do is to look at the CS to see if it was done Use the Summary Sheet to get the Auditor's attitude. Use the Auditor's Report Form to get the time of processes. Read and take all your data from Worksheets and compare it to and see that CS was complied with and ensure Standard Tech was applied. If you can't read the reports, send it back to have the Auditor over-print illegible words. Never try to case supervise (CS) an illegible worksheet as you'll only run into headaches. The After Session Examiner's Report gives you the first clue of how suspicious you should be in examining the folder and whether or not auditing reports contain falsities. Standard Tech You're never led by anything into departing from Standard Tech. The only reason it doesn't work is that it hasn't been applied. The main question of a Case Supervisor is: WAS IT APPLIED? If you follow this exactly, you'll never miss. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ei.rd copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 168. HCOB 6 OCT 70 FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1970 Remimeo C/S Hats C/S checksheet C/S Series 19 FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES A folder error summary, (FES) is usually done by a student especially an interne well taught, learning his practical tech or by an auditor especially hired to do FESs. It requires many hours to put a folder in sequence and then to list all errors in it. It should NEVER be done by a working C/S who is responsible for an org's delivery flow. COST It is costly to do an FES and where possible the cost, duly consulting the pc, should be borne by the pc as a special service. It can be directly paid for or simply deducted from auditing hours purchased. NECESSITY A good C/S looking over a folder usually goes back to the last time the pc was doing really well and notes actions necessary from that point. Programs of a lengthily audited case (fat folder) usually cover LIB, L3A, L4A lists and usually take up 2-way comm on earliest sessions and earliest auditing ever given (for auditors). Thus an FES is not vital in all cases. I like to have an FES done so I can compare areas covered by the pc in 2-way comm and be sure they come up in subsequent repair sessions. Also where I can see a lot of bad lists existed, I want to be able to assure they get handled. Thus an FES is useful. On Flag, an FES is carefully done so as to detect areas of out tech in the world. This is called "the Flub Catch System". Auditors and C/Ses so detected are sent to cramming in their areas to smooth out their tech knowledge or TRs, all to improve delivery of tech. Flub Catch makes an FES vital on Flag. Higher orgs have a similar interest in an FES. HALTING DELIVERY To halt delivery because of a missing folder or to do a long time-consuming FES is of course contrary to the need to deliver auditing and can result in a no-auditing situation worse than a Blind Repair. BLIND REPAIR When no FES is done, one is doing a Blind Repair. The Progress Pgm and Advance Pgm may have holes in them. However there are only five areas of danger: 1. Flubbed lists. 2. A bad series of evaluative sessions should be detected and directly handled. 3. Flubbed Power. 4. Extended or flubbed Interiorization. 5. Missed grades. If a C/S doesn't know about these it may be that the case will not properly repair and he also does not know what Advance Program to do. But as these are specific areas they can be done on a Blind Repair by making them into a list and getting them meter checked. Example: Pc has lost his folder. Has been audited for several years on and off. One can clear the idea of lists "Someone written down items you say to a question" and see if it gets a read and if so do L4A Method Three "On Lists". One can ask if any auditor ever told the pc what to think and if that reads 2-way comm or prepcheck those sessions by that auditor. Power can be checked by rehab unless the person has gone Clear on the Clearing Course since at which time Power will not need repair. The commands of Interiorization Rundown can be checked with 2-way comm or rehabbed. What won't rehab you run. Missed Grades can be checked, rehabbed or run including any Expanded Grades. The pc usually recognizes the process if it has been run. Thus one can wander through a Blind Repair without fouling up the case and add to it the inevitable actions common to all Progress Pgms. SUMMARY An FES has value. It is valuable to the pc to get one done. It is a long and extensive action. It can be sold directly or removed from hours bought. It is of vast interest in training auditors and should be done by already trained internes or specially hired auditors. It is NOT done by a C/S and it is NOT used to halt all delivery of auditing and jam up the C/S lines. A lost or delayed folder is not a barrier to a very well trained C/S who has starrated a C/S Course. An FES is very useful and tends to eradicate any mystery for a C/S. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: sb.td Copyright ©1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 169. BTB 8 NOV 72 r. 4 Jun 75 FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 NOVEMBER 1972RA Issue II Remimeo FES Units C/S Hats Revised 4 June 1975 Auditor Admin Series 22 RA FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES Ref: HCO B 6 Oct 70 C/S Series 19, "Folder Error Summaries" TAPE 7 Apr 72 Ex Dn Tape 3, "Auditor Administration" (NOTE: Data for this revision was taken from LRH's written reply to a letter from former Tech C/S ASHO.) TWO METHODS OF FESing There are two methods of FESing a case. The first is a full detailed FES where one goes back and picks up and notes down all past errors on the case so that a Progress and Advance Program can be done. Where the C/S is interested in handling the case more rapidly, the procedure is to go back to where the Pc was running well and come forward, looking for the goofs to repair. This would also apply in the case of a Pc who, already repaired, was goofed in further auditing. These are different FES methods-a Progress Program and Repair C/Sing. Neither one includes Admin errors or errors which do not affect the case. THE FLAW Folder Error Summaries (FESes) which do not show clearly whether an error has been corrected later in the Pc's auditing, can lead the C/S into over-repair. Such a flaw lessens the usefulness of an FES. NEW FORMAT To handle the above flaw, the layout and contents of the FES have been revised. The following is the format of the FES which should be on legal or equivalent size pink or red paper according to availability. One can see at a glance that all the noted errors have been corrected. A blank space in the right-hand column would indicate that the error had not yet been fixed. This column is filled in by the FESer as he goes along, or by the Auditor as correction is done. For example a note: "Chronic high TA" would be marked off by the Auditor "C/S 53RJ to F/N List. TA normal" with the date, when that action had been completed. Any error noted in the correction of the case IS NOTED AS A NEW ERROR ON THE FES. THE FES IS KEPT IN PT BY THE AUDITOR AS ERRORS ARE NOTED. The C/S will use the FES as a help in further programming of the Pc. It is kept in the inside back cover of the Pc's folder. WHAT IS WANTED IN AN FES An FES should contain those points of error in the auditing of a case which might cause the Pc future difficulty or may require handling. These would include rundowns left unflat or with missing steps; signs of unflat grades; absence of any of the parts of EP, noting what was being run; any chronic problem or difficulty; by-passed EP on any rundown; illness or ethics trouble after an auditing cycle. The most important points which can bog a case are well covered in the C/S Series, with which an FESer should be familiar. In particular, anyone doing an FES must know very well C/S Series 1, 2, 15, 19, 29, 30, 34, 38, 59. He must be able to recognize and pick out any of the case errors described in the above issues. Anyone doing FES work must be thoroughly familiar with the GF40XRR. Anything on the case which falls under any of the headings on this list should also be clearly noted in the FES, "Pc was a member of black magic society" could be the thing which is stalling her case. WHAT ISN'T WANTED An FES is NOT the same as an FS. The 2 must not be combined or confused. Opinions have no part in FES. Do not note admin errors in an FES. Any error which is not part of the case or its auditing has no place on the FES. It can be the subject of a chit or separate report. Examples of this would be: "Auditor did not fill in the Folder Summary" or "Pc not being audited on any program" or "No-one C/Sing the folder". Statements which R/Sed, and Ev Purps given off by the Pc are not usually noted in an FES. THE FACT THAT HE DOES R/S, OR DOES GIVE OFF EV PURPS MUST BE NOTED ON THE LEFT-HAND EDGE OF THE PC'S TOPMOST PROGRAM. R/S statements (which the Pc said that R/Sed when he said it) and Ev Purps are noted on the Pgm in red ink and may be noted on the FS. Dianetic chains that did not go to EP, flows not run, are noted on a Full Flow Table, not on the FES. The fact that a series of items was run F1 only, or did not EP, is noted on the FES, to be marked off when corrected. A C/S and his FES unit work closely together and the C/S would usually apprentice these people until they can very rapidly and accurately FES even a thick folder. Revised by Marion Kimmich Flag Tech Comps I/C for W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides and the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:RS:MK:nt jh Copyright © 1972, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 170. HCOB 2 NOV 68 r. 31 Jan 75 THE BASIC PROCESSES HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 2 NOVEMBER 1968R REVISED 31 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo Class VIII CASE SUPERVISOR CLASS VIII THE BASIC PROCESSES There are several processes which are unlimited. These are very valuable to the Case Supervisor. There are many processes which are limited. These must be traced as not having been done before the C/S orders them done. LIMITED PROCESSES The basic Grade Processes tend to produce Overrun if repeated once done. This is very true of Power and R6EW. Rehab of Grade Processes can be done far too often. Rehab of Grades should be limited to once just before Power and once in the OT IV Rundown. And that's it. S & Ds are more or less limited to one of each type. About one Remedy B on Dianetics and Scientology and one New Style is about it. In general a list question for listing and nulling is a one-shot affair. Lists are very fast actions requiring skilled auditing and should not be handed out carelessly. As a rule any of the above are limited because when repeated they can drive the TA up into overrun. UNLIMITED ACTIONS The most unlimited action is the running of engrams. So long as one uses different subjects one has an unlimited action, the only limitation being the subject of the engrams. This should not be repeated. A Case Supervisor only has to be alert that the chain on the subject has not been run. This is fortunate because running engrams also produces the most case gain. Secondaries rank with engrams on this unlimited sphere except that secondaries depend for their force on the engrams underlying them and if you run too many secondaries the pc drops into engrams anyway. Recall processes (where recall means only remembering) are unlimited, the only limitation being the subject. You can only run "recall Subject A" for each flow. Then you have to have another subject. There are to be very exact three flows for each Recall subject, three flows for the same subject as secondaries, three flows for the same subject as engrams. Let us take "eating" as a fictitious subject for example. Here is the practical list of obtainable F/Ns. RECALL 1. Recall yourself eating. 2. Recall another eating. 3. Recall another (watching, making) another eat. SECONDARY 1. Find and run a secondary or chain of being emotional about eating. 2. Find and run a secondary or chain of another being emotional about eating. 3. Find and run a secondary or chain of another being emotional about another eating. ENGRAM 1. Find and run an engram (moment of pain and unconsciousness) or chain of being eaten. 2. Find and run an engram (moment of pain and unconsciousness) or chain of eating another. 3. Find and run an engram (moment of pain and unconsciousness) or chain of another eating another. You could order or do all these on one pc. (Providing "eating" read well on the meter in the first place.) But to run a new "Recall" or "Secondary" or "Engram" you would have to avoid the subject already run. You'd have to find a new subject. These three flows and three actions are possible on any one subject that reads. Each is taken to floating needle. The TA would only rise if you overran any of the one actions or if you again tried to get it done on a new C/S action. The use of this is interesting. We can find that the pc in some old C/S was run through his operation and still has a somatic. A skilled Case Supervisor knows he can get rid of the somatic by running the remaining flows. It is common to run the motivator engram and find the pc still has a somatic. So you run the overt on the same subject. If he still has it you can run the third flow of another doing it to another. These lingering somatics used to be a bad thing, and were often a mystery. The engram (or recall) went to F/N but the pc still had a somatic. The answer is of course to order the other flow run. And the somatic will vanish. The dub-in case has a wholly one-sided flow and is trying to run the other side! He will obsessively seek to run the opposite flow to the one he should be running. He can have too heavy a "motivator" and be seeking wildly to run false overts to explain having been hit so hard. So he dubs in overts. Or he has committed some wild overt, intentional or unintentional and is trying to get false motivators. This can even go into the third flow where a person sees a man hit and tries to run being hit or hitting whereas he wasn't a party to either. (You solve this by assessment when you spot dub-in, or just by observing which side is dubbed. You order the other flows run or at least checked to see where the real charge lies.) These actions, then, are limited only by subject. This does not mean that you can't get a high TA suddenly on them. You can accidentally order the same subject as was ordered once before. Or wrong ownership can cause the TA to act up in a peculiar way that looks like an overrun. However, earlier incidents of a similar kind usually get this handled on down to F/N. In fact this crops up and is handled on lower grade pcs more often than you think. The PREPCHECK is another unlimited action. Once more it is the subject that limits it. Not in practice but in theory, on one subject you could Prepcheck, run 3 recalls, three secondaries and three engrams each to F/N. However it gets dicey in practice as the pc protests sometimes. And it is protest of doing it too often after all that pushes the TA up. Havingness is probably not limited. The ruds questions if not done in the same day tend to be unlimited. The TA going up on ruds is pc protest coming from cleaned cleans or false reads. Or he gave you his ARC Brks and now you're asking for more. Ruds, therefore are handled in moderation always. You don't for instance "fly a rud" when the pc comes into session with an F/N. The TA will go up in protest or down in overwhelm. If you put in all ruds to F/N, waited an hour and put in all ruds to F/N again the TA would either soar or drop below 2.0, depending on how the pc looked at it. Assessing prepared lists is unlimited so long as the items are varied. Doing L1C or L4BR or other such lists is unlimited SO LONG AS YOU DON'T BYPASS THE FIRST F/N ON THAT LIST IN ANY ONE SESSION. The GREEN FORM is of this nature. You can do a large number of "GFs" on pcs providing they are each time done to the first F/N. And providing you don't permit any listing and nulling. And providing enough time has gone by to let new data be available. 2 GFs in one day would be fatal. Two in a week risky. The Itsa Earlier Itsa approach to ruds and GF is safe and in general Itsa Earlier Itsa is unlimited. As soon as you let an auditor introduce any other process than Itsa Earlier Itsa on a form you get problems as he is stacking up potential overruns on limited processes. If each time an auditor had a Problem reading on a pc he ran a process, you'd soon have an overrun situation going. Itsa Earlier Itsa is unlimited. ARCU, CDEINR appears to be unlimited for ARC Brks. "WHO nearly found out" is unlimited for Missed W/Hs. But have a care here. In the OT sections pre-OTs often have plain withholds that have no overt connected with them, so withholds is always okay to use especially "In the last session_____" or "In Auditing_____ ". The approach here is: "In auditing has there been an ARC Brk?" ARCU CDEINR. "In auditing has there been a problem?" (not "PTP") Itsa Earlier Itsa. "In auditing has there been a withhold?" Itsa Earlier Itsa. Suppress and "Has anyone said you had a_____when you didn't" are always used in Rudiments, past sessions or current. You can only fly all ruds with the use of Suppress and False reads ("Has anybody said____"). Auditors who have to get into GFs in "flying a rud" either don't know an F/N when they see one or haven't any skill in using Suppress and False. These are all unlimited actions with the reservations as noted. THE PROBLEM OF THE C/S The main problem of a C/S comes about in trying to use the key law: "Reality is proportional to the amount of charge off." A fat review folder, a rollercoaster case, a pc who never gets out of this life, a pc who runs stubbing his toe yesterday as an engram, a pc who dubs in, are alike overcharged cases. To "send" one over the top requires lots of light charge off. The worse off the case, the lighter you handle it. Older practices matched a violent case with violence and never did win at all. They wound up with murder as the "best possible solution". The problem is to get off lots of charge without going very deep on heavily charged cases. Then they eventually come out right. You hold off main actions as long as you can and just work to get charge off. Then you eventually get deep enough to really shove a major action at them. For instance, by carefully preparing a case for a "full IV rundown" with lots of preparatory actions you get an OT every time. It seldom occurs to people that a lot of cases get the highest gains on the TRs of auditing only and the lower grade processes are far too steep and when run on them the pc on Communication Grade Zero does not stop stammering or doesn't cease to be shy. Zero was run on him too soon. You see a fabulous gain on some person doing TR 0. Or "just talking to an auditor to F/N". Study blows charge. Some persons (the insane) would have to rest for a week or two to stand up to a mild chat. Some other person could start at Grade IV and do just fine. So the only variable a C/S has is how charged up is a case. The cases all react to the same things, the same actions. But they differ in the amount of "charge". Determining and lightening the charge is the problem of the C/S. There are Personality, IQ and E-Meter tests that give an idea of how charged up the case may be. The thick folder, the times in Review, the thickness of a single session report are of great use. These things only say that some cases are more charged up than others. So the C/S has the actually infinite variety of ways he can apply the FEW actions described above in unlimited processes. Then he has the QUALITY of the charge he can remove. He can do 7 cases over and over so long as he removes the last one run from the new list to be assessed (as the list would F/N on the item just handled). He can comb the area of a pc's environ and with a synonym dictionary compile dozens of different lists. It isn't hard to find what recurring problems a pc has. These can go into lists for assessment and Prepcheck or II or each to F/N of 3 recalls or even 3 engrams on higher level cases. Think processes are also unlimited. And have 3 flows. There may be other such unlimited actions. A C/S is also limited by what his auditors can do. And is wise to stay within their training framework. So you see what's standard. The ACTIONS, the Auditing. The subjects used in these ways can be very wide. All you really have to be sure of is that the subject reads on the meter and that the way it's handled on the pc doesn't overwhelm the pc and that's the size of it. The Grades are already laid out like a carpet. You set up the case to run them. If the case is set up for the Grades then you really get wins wins wins. Some Case Supervisor, dazzled by the vast scope you can get from a pc being set up for OT IV overlooks the fact that he can set up pcs for wins on ARC Straight Wire that will look very dazzling to the pc. If the auditor flunks a C/S and can't get it going, the repair action would be (for non-rud sessions) one of the following- 1. Assess Upset, Problem, Not disclosing something, Unable to say something, Ignored, Didn't understand. (Be careful not to get an item because pc couldn't dig it.) 2. Handle what read with Itsa Earlier Itsa or 1. Assess Auditors, Auditing, Dianetics, Scientology, Sessions, Organization, Books. 2. Prepcheck or 1. Have pc explain why he doesn't want auditing and gently slide into Itsa Earlier Itsa. or 1. Assess 7 cases in an expanded list of each rud, omit grades or 1. Green Form to 1st F/N. Be sure questions phrased so pc understands them. So far as Sub-Zeroes go, you have to be very ready to send the pc to Review for the remedies. And you have to be ready to realize that each of these Sub-Zeroes is a grade and that some pcs just aren't set up for them. So you do your review actions before the pc gets in over his head. This is where the Personality Analysis, IQ, and meter test are invaluable. The worse off these come out, the more you work to set the pc up. It even goes down as low as: 1. Pc to handle environment before auditing or 1. Pc to eat better for a week or 1. Pc to rest a week before first session or 1. Pc to take care of physical illness or injury before auditing followed by, some time later, 1. Notice that object to F/N, or 1. Have pc find something in room that is really real to him to F/N. ----------- So you see that all auditing is built of the same stuff-the Code, the Actions, the smooth TRs. Standard C/Sing is the use of these actions. Setting pc up for the Grades. A C/S can appear very clever indeed. His cleverness is composed of just the things you find here and in the way he finds ways to use them. He orders auditing in accordance with where the pc is on the grades. He hoards his grades until he is sure they fly the pc. And that is good C/Sing. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: rs.rd Copyright © 1968, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED **************