CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 11/16 CLASS VIII COURSE PACK CONTENTS: Part 11 120. HCOB 18 APR 68 NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV 121. HCOB 14 OCT 68 METER POSITION 122. HCOB 5 MAR 65 BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES - APPLICATION OF TECH 123. HCOB 12 DEC 68 INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR 124. HCOB 23 AUG 68 WORKABILITY OF TECH 125. HCOB 23 AUG 68 ARBITRARIES 126. HCOB 28 AUG 68 OUT TECH 127. HCOB 7 MAY 69 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, ... 128. HCOB 4 SEP 68 CLASS VIII 129. HCOB 6 SEP 68 CHECKING FOR FALSE READS 130. HCOB 10 SEP 68 "STANDARD" TECH DATA 131. HCOB 28 FEB 75 add. 10 Sep 68 GREEN FORM, S & D 132. HCOB 10 SEP 68 FLUNKS 133. HCOB 11 SEP 68 FALSE READS 134. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII (re Purpose List) 135. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII "The first thing...." 136. HCOB 19 SEP 68 (re Old Lists) 137. HCOB 28 SEP 68 REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO 138. HCOB 20 SEP 68 GLEE 139. HCOB 22 SEP 68 CLASS VIII "Auditors must always...." 140. HCOB 25 SEP 68 CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS 141. HCOB 26 SEP 68 "The study of the 'Well Done' LRH C/Sed Folders..." 142. HCOB 11 APR 77 LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF 143. HCOB 30 SEP 68 LISTS 144. HCOB 20 APR 72 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION 145. HCOB 23 SEP 68 DRUGS & TRIPPERS 146. HCOB 20 SEP 78 LX LIST HANDLING 147. HCOB 2 AUG 69 r. 4 Sep 78 "LX" LISTS 148. HCOB 5 NOV 69 r. 4 Sep 78 LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2) 149. HCOB 3 AUG 69 r. 22 Aug 78 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST 150. HCOB 9 AUG 69 r. 4 Nov 78 LX1 (CONDITIONS) 151. HCOPL 7 APR 70 r. 8 Dec 78 GREEN FORM 152. HCOB 25 NOV 71 RESISTIVE CASES - FORMER THERAPY 120. HCOB 18 APR 68 NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 APRIL 1968 Remimeo Qual Divs Rev AOs OT Study Materials NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV In doing Green Forms or Analysis Lists on any Clears (but not in nulling) or doing them on most cases above 5 and some cases below it, there are 2 different E-Meter needle phenomena which have to be given attention: 1. As a Clear's postulates read as a surge, usually fairly long (over 1"), "No" can read if the pc says it to himself as an answer to a question asked. A read, therefore, does not mean invariably "yes" or that the question is charged. All it means is that the Meter has read. The Auditor must now find out what the read was before determining he should do something about that portion of the Green Form or List. One doesn't just assume the read was "yes". One asks about the read as a general rule, not assuming at once the thing asked was charged. Example- Auditor: "Do you have a missed withhold?" Meter surges. Auditor: "What was that?" Pre OT: "I thought No I don't." Auditor: "Ok. Do you have a missed withhold?" Pre OT: "No."-Meter didn't read. Auditor: "Anything suppressed-asserted-protested-invalidated. Ok that's clean." Ticks ( 1 / 8 inch) often mean something is there. A Pre OT's postulates have greater length when they surge. It is not important how you handle this phenomena of postulate or to-oneself comment by a high level case. It i s important that the Auditor does not hang the case with a wrong adjudication of what's wrong by thinking every surge means "yes", or that the question is charged because it surges. A question is charged only if it won't clean up with buttons until the action itself is taken. A Pre OT, unlike pcs below Grades I or II, usually recognizes what is wrong as soon as it is mentioned. He or she is more aware. 2. A response like a brief dirty needle on a Pre OT means "No" always. So there is a certain and trustworthy negative to be had on a Pre OT. A real dirty needle is constant and continues. The same small jerky needle action on a person Grade 5 or above means "No!" or that the question is negative. On pcs below 5 it means a withhold or an ARC break or almost anything and is of course continuous. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jc.rd Copyright © 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 121. HCOB 14 OCT 68 METER POSITION HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 14 OCTOBER 1968 Remimeo METER POSITION YOU MUST NEVER NEVER NEVER HAVE YOUR METER IN A POSITION WHERE THE PRECLEAR CAN READ THE TA. To do so can cause the pc worry about his TA position and take his attention off his case. It violates Clause 17 of the Auditor's Code. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH :jp.ei.rd Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 122. HCOB 5 MAR 65 BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES - APPLICATION OF TECH HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MARCH 1965 Issue II Remimeo Franchise Sthil Students Sthil Staff ALL LEVELS BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES APPLICATION OF TECH A sure road to award and glory is to find a new application for an existing Scientology process or principle or book. The period of the discovery of principles, processes or original works is surely over as we have everything between the snake's stomach and the high sky by way of natural laws. Inventing and using new processes is a sure way to slow down the advance. There were only so many anyway and it's been done. But new ways to apply or disseminate what we've got are welcome, welcome, welcome. We've not nearly enough of those and we'll be inventing or seeing them for the next umpty trillion years. So my hat is off to Beth Fordyce, HCO Area Sec Detroit, U.S.A., who informed us via U.S. Continental of a new use for The Book of Case Remedies for which she'll receive a bow and appropriate award, to wit her DScn. Here is her report. "At the January D.C. Congress, I had some interesting data about The Book of Case Remedies that you (HCO Cont Sec U.S.) thought I ought to write up for Ron because you felt he'd be interested in it. Here it is. "We've had several instances where people have read the remedies and come in to tell me that certain ones 'fit' them. Then when they started to tell me which ones specifically, they couldn't remember them-or they would be able to remember only one. The book obviously indicates by-passed charge, and handles most of the problems. They find out what their problem actually is. "One fellow who has been ARC broken with Scientology for years (even before I heard of Scn), came in and I asked him to find himself in the remedies. He started reading them, and each one seemed to fit him (except about 3 or 4 of them). I noted them down one by one, as he called them to me. When he finished, I said no more about it. "Later on-about 15 minutes-he decided he'd better look through those again because he 'was sure that they didn't all fit-maybe some of them have changed'. So he went through them again, one by one, and only 3 still seemed to apply-and only ONE of them was strongest, he felt. The other two seemed to have lost their punch. "He was quite different after that. I also did what the remedy called for, which cleaned it up. The last time I saw him-at our Congress-he not once mentioned the problem he's always had with eye-spots. (And, frankly, I was afraid at that point to say 'eye-spots' to him for fear he'd key it back in again, so I just settled for HIS not mentioning it!) "As soon as we get our next batch of Remedies, I intend to send at least 4 of them as gifts to people who are badly ARC broken with us. If they actually read them, I know exactly what will happen-they can't stay ARC broken. Best, Beth So there's a wide open door. Try it out on "rough cases" and demand ARC Broken ones do it and write you back or tell you which one it is. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.pw.rd Copyright © 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 123. HCOB 12 DEC 68 INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 12 DECEMBER 1968 Class VIII INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR It was discovered in the Sea Organisation that proven high calibre good standard Class VIII auditors suddenly without any apparent reason ceased to be able to audit well, made gross goofs and backed off from auditing completely. Its source was traced back to INVALIDATION. The cases on whom it occurred were handled very speedily, very simply with ASTOUNDING RESULTS. The remedy was simply asking them in 2 way comm who had told them they couldn't audit. No meter, no complications, just very simple 2 way comm. One of the cases was in fact handled in a room full of people. This case was black in the face and most adamantly refused to audit and ARC broken to the extent that she PHYSICALLY WALKED AWAY from the idea. The question was simply asked "WHO told you you couldn't audit?", or "that your auditing wasn't any good?" "Nobody did." "OK. WHO told you your auditing wasn't any good?" Sudden misemotion "you all did" ... "OK WHO?" ... BRIGHTENS ..says a name. "OK ... did somebody at some earlier stage tell you you couldn't audit?" "No...but sos and so told me that I wasn't doing any good in such and such...ooooooh..line charge...my mother always told me that I couldn't do...bla bla bla..." Very bright now, still slightly hesitant.."OK..when is ALWAYS?"..."When I was 6"...BINGO. Back to auditing, and ... getting "WELL DONES", and pc's WINNING, auditor getting STANDARD sessions and STANDARD results. And that is ALL there is to it. We are talking here about the Class VIII auditor giving this assist and the Class VIII auditor receiving it. Scientologists of this calibre and standard of training can be expected to have the awareness and ability to bring these results about. The length it took for these actions was from about 3 to 5 minutes. The Class VIII auditor is an outstanding target for invalidation. BEWARE!! The actions described above were done virtually off the cuff by a Class VIII auditor on other Class VIII's, and were done when the INVALIDATION factor was isolated as the common denominator. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:OJR:ldm:de Copyright © 1968 by L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 124. HCOB 23 AUG 68 WORKABILITY OF TECH HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968 Class VIII WORKABILITY OF TECH The quality of technology is to the degree it increases percentages of cures it obtains within the framework of the society in which it operates. 22 1 / 2 % will change for the better or "get well" on sugar pills. 33% will make it regardless of how the tech is applied. The percentages from these on up are determined by the formula. Early Dianetics with a raw book auditor run well over 50%. Then into Scientology shot the percentages up to 97%, 3% here being those heavily PTS and so on. Even these are being handled with standard tech eventually. These percentages are all inclusive of all possible tech errors because we do get the percentages finally. This then shows that Scientology technology, when applied by standard tech action, will give a fantastic percentage of successes to the auditor who does only standard tech actions. The older practices have a very hard time showing 10% even though 22 1/2% recover on sugar pills. The quality of Scientology technology is in the percentages, provable and observable. The workability of Scientology can be shown. Do so. Older practices can't. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 125. HCOB 23 AUG 68 ARBITRARIES HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968 Class VIII ARBITRARIES Any arbitrary entered into any line is a way to stop that line. An auditor doing a job of auditing suddenly enters an arbitrary such as "The pc now has a grief charge so he must have a withhold as I've just cleaned up ARC breaks." Or any such wild think. This arbitrary would stop that pc's case right now. You get all there is to know about tech from HCOBs, tapes, books. This is all. Here's one-when the needle on an E-Meter read in the response to an auditor's question, all you know is that the needle on the E-Meter read. That's all you know. Now in the next few seconds you will prove out, as to whether the read was to the question or to something else like a protest. To assume anything else in regard to meter reads is an arbitrary and will close up that pc with a bang. That's the data. Knock off all the arbitraries NOW. Punch in hard standard tech. Standard tech is that tech which has absolutely no arbitraries. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ja.pc Copyright © 1968 By L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 126. HCOB 28 AUG 68 OUT TECH HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 28 AUGUST 1968 Remimeo Class VIII All Orgs OUT TECH After Standard Tech is out for just so long in an org, Scientology ceases to have any meaning. Squirrel processes and repairs wind the staff up in a ball, enturbulate the field and cause a general lethargy and trouble. Ethics then goes in hard or it all goes up in smoke. There is only one Standard Tech! It contains only a few dozen processes and actions. It was not complete before 1966. Students study mainly the Research Line. Standard Tech consists of the exact grade processes and Case Repair. Some still look for magic buttons that resolve a case all at once. Some can't duplicate what they read and hear. They need the broad body of knowledge. BUT the actual application of Dian & Scn today contains only a few dozen STANDARD INVARIABLE SIMPLE actions and processes. When these are not used, when opinion enters, it's all gone. STANDARD TECH ALONE RESOLVES ALL CASES. No matter how bright, the other processes and new inventions of someone else (a) work only on a few and (b) are efforts to solve one's own case by auditing others. To let Standard Tech go out is an act of Treason as Scientology then loses all meaning in an org. This is why I am teaching a Class VIII Course. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH-jp.ei.bh Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 127. HCOB 7 MAY 69 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, ... HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1969 (Revision of HCOB 1 September 1968) Issue VI Remimeo Cl VIII Dianetic Course SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, WORKSHEETS AND SUMMARY REPORT, WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AUDITOR'S REPORT An Auditor's Report should contain: Date Name of Auditor Name of Pc Condition of Pc Length of Session Time Session started and ended TA at beginning and end of Session Rudiments What Process was run-LISTING THE EXACT COMMANDS (often forgotten by most auditors) Time of Start and End of Process Whether Process is flat or not Any F/Ns. WORK SHEETS A Work Sheet is supposed to be the complete running record of the session from beginning to end. The Auditor should not be skipping from one page to another but should just be writing page after page as the session goes along. A Work Sheet is always foolscap, 8 x 13 inches, written on both sides and each page is numbered. Pc's name is written on each separate sheet. A Work Sheet may be in 2 columns depending on how big the writing is of the Auditor. When the session is completed, the Work Sheets are put in proper sequence and stapled with the Auditor's Report Form on top from beginning to end of session. TA and time notations should be made at regular intervals throughout the session. When making a list on a Pc: 1. Always mark a read as it reads-F. LF. BD. 2. Always circle the reading item. Mark if indicated to the Pc with IND. 3. Always when extending a list put in a line from where it has been extended, e.g. Item Joe Shoes Socks ____________________ extended Sky Wax Pigs, etc., etc. NOTE: When you repair an old auditing session you always write on the old auditing report and W/sheets in a different coloured pen with the date of the-report. When running various processes in a session, mark each F/N clearly noting time and TA. SUMMARY REPORT A Summary Report is written exactly as per HCOB 17 March 1969, "Summary Report". Two gross goofs I have noticed since case supervising folders on the RSM is that Auditors have not been turning in Ethics cases to the MAA. In one instance, a Pc was audited by 2 auditors in 2 different sessions, got a R/S on crimes against Scientologists and M/W/Hs and neither auditor turned the Pc in to Ethics. This is not the only instance. The second thing is that Auditors are very evaluative of the Pc's case as indicated by their comments on the Summary Report. This is incorrect; this report is used simply as an exact record of what happened during the session. It is not up to the auditor to evaluate the Pc's Case, this is the Case Supervisor's job. The auditor may suggest what is to be run, at which time the Case Supervisor will review the session, what was run, how the Pc went in relation to what was being run and then give his directions. ------------- Auditor Report Forms or W/sheets are never recopied. The Auditor should always read over his W/sheets before turning in folder to the Case Supervisor and, if any words or letters are missing or cannot be read, they should be written in with a different coloured pen. If these rules are followed it will make the Case Supervisor's job much much easier and auditors' reports more valuable. To add the obvious, it is a CRIME to give any session or assist without making an Auditor's Report or to copy the original actual report after the session and submit a copy instead of the real report. Assist reports that use only contact or touch assists may be written after a session and sent to Qual. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.an.cs.ei.cden Copyright © 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 128. HCOB 4 SEP 68 CLASS VIII HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII Don't force a pc who is ill. The whole intention when auditing a pc who is sick is making him well. If overts, or M/W/Hs don't read, even though he is nattering, then they are not available to be run right then. A preclear who is not well cannot look, his havingness is down and he must be handled permissively-always. The mechanism of RELEASE must be well understood to make an ill person well. They plunge down the track madly on any excuse. They require much lighter auditing than they stand up to when well. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 129. HCOB 6 SEP 68 CHECKING FOR FALSE READS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII CHECKING FOR FALSE READS When you check for earlier auditor false reads on a GF or rudiment type read: When follow-up of the read seems to bog down, get nowhere and when pc has no answers. When the pc protests, seems ARC Broken by the read or seems resigned. When the pc starts to explain how the thing has been run before. When there is protest or inval. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 130. HCOB 10 SEP 68 "STANDARD" TECH DATA HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead. Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII "STANDARD" TECH DATA "Standard" in standard tech auditing is a precise activity, done with good TRs, exact grade processes and exact actions. A Green Form is done by handling every read, not by "uhuh" or nulling it, or doing it after the GF is all done. Observe the Auditor's Code in every line and do the usual and solve the case. Standard action in handling Green Form ARC Brks PTP and M/W/H (a) Itsa (b) If not cleared on Itsa get the basic on the chain. All GF and L and ruds follow this rule. A process is not used except ARC break ARCU CDEI. Always do a list like L1, L4 or GF, etc., by handling each read as it's found. Random auditing on pcs and pre-OTs should not be done. Knock off these arbitrary "Somebody else thinks he needs a_____." This is evaluative and a break of the Auditor's Code. Pcs can be stopped by over-repairs they just need to get on with it. Do standard GF and remedy actions and let pc or pre-OT get on with the next cycle of section or grade. It's the grade processes and OT levels that improve cases. The process the pc should be on is always the next grade. If TA rises between sessions. get it down with ruds and if that doesn't get it down, a Green Form. This is a standing order. TAs that won't come down with routine rudiments come down with GF. True of ALL rehabbing actions is you don't rehab on a high TA at session start. Only when it is just then overrun. Then you rehab it back to F/N. In ruds, all you know when you see a read is that the meter read and the question you asked. The meter read is not uniformly what you asked and can be a protest or a REPEATING FALSE READ. Usually one goes right along auditing but when pc shows any sign of protest or bafflement on a rud read, you routinely trace it for an earlier false read, find and clean it. If an R/S won't clean up on a pc, clean up "Have you ever been accused of things you haven't done" as a process as the R/S may be from invalidation. Can also clean up protest. R/S on a child may be: (A) Don't tell. Somebody told him not to. (B) Crime. (C) Accusation-said you did something you didn't do. You set up a case with F/N before you undertake major new actions. Always set up a case to be run. End off an action at F/N. It's not safe to begin a session without an ARC Br check when there's been a time between sessions. With pcs in sad effect, you should always check ARC break of long duration. You treble time in session every time you take any breaks. To economize in auditing time (session time) you should cut out breaks as they get the pc in trouble when he's out of the room, then you have to clean it up and so time is lost. No TA on a Sec Check means pc tends to be out of valence. Anybody has a few. TA goes high and low when a pc is going into and to PT from a heavy past life. Never tell a pc he will have another session in session as it continues the session and doesn't end it. An old old old rule. You never let pc off cans in standard tech. A persistent item that doesn't blow is usually a wrong item. Other symptoms could proceed from a wrong item. A Prepcheck in nearly every case turns on and uncovers old ARC breaks. In doing a Prepcheck be alert for BIs, and ask ARC Br question. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jp. ja Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 131. HCOB 28 FEB 75 add. 10 Sep 68 GREEN FORM, S & D HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968-1 ADDITION OF 28 FEBRUARY 1975 Remimeo Class VIII (This is an amendment of HCO B 10 Sept 68, "Green Form, S & D, Remedy B". NOTE: Original HCO B 10 Sept 68 is changed in distribution to Solo C/S Crse and is not cancelled as it contains vital data for the Solo C/S.) GREEN FORM, S & D It was found in C/Supervising aboard the RSM that the following additives had been entered and are not altogether correct. 1. "Green Form to Free Needle." Not necessarily correct. It may or may not. Each item on the Green Form is independent of the rest. However it can be a serious blunder to continue a GF past an F/N. I have seen TAs then rise. The only time you would ever do this (go past an F/N on a Green Form) would be when GIs were not in and the pc still felt he was in trouble. In this case the F/N is probably an ARC Brk needle and an ARC Break should be checked. 2. "S & Ds to F/N" (WSU). Not necessarily true. You stop as per listing rules. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.nt.rd Copyright © 1968,1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 132. HCOB 10 SEP 68 FLUNKS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII FLUNKS These are the most common goofs found made by auditors in case supervising over a hundred folders. (1) Pc audited with no instructions from C/S. (2) Audited on squirrel process. (3) False Auditor Report-FLUNK FLUNK. (4) Audited past F/N. (5) Auditing a pc while on medication. (6) Auditing a pc while ill. (7) Leaving pc with a problem. (8) Auditing a pc on no sleep. (9) Nulling an L1 to largest read. (10) Not giving pc his item. (11) Not tracing an ARC break, M/W/H or PTP down to basic when it doesn't blow. (12) Not handling reading GF items as they occur. (13) Failure to use ruds on even GF when TA rises between session before starting major action of session. (14) Not following C/S instructions. (15) Taking frequent breaks. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.wa Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 133. HCOB 11 SEP 68 FALSE READS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII FALSE READS False Reads are handled by checking back any that are false to when they were first "seen" by an auditor. Sometimes a false read goes on and on, never cleans because there wasn't anything there in the first place. Find when and where somebody thought it read when it didn't. Can ask, "Who said you had an______reading when you didn't have one?" Also check Protest, Invalidate and Suppress to clean up a false read. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jpts Copyright © 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 134. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII (re Purpose List) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII Pc looking or continually feeling tired = blunted purpose, evaluation and invalidation . M/W/H gives a nattery critical aspect, not "Pc looks tired" as one auditor thought. Pc feels tired. Do a purpose list as follows: What purpose has been blunted? (You can also use "abandoned" if it reads better.) Find an item. If no F/N, Prepcheck it to F/N. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 135. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII "The first thing...." HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII The first thing I learned about teaching a Class VIII auditor is he thinks he can fly before he can even creep. Such is the power of standard tech, it can go to his head as an auditor and as a Case Supervisor before he learns even the barest essentials. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 136. HCOB 19 SEP 68 (re Old Lists) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1968 Remimeo L&N Chksht Class VIII (Reissued 8 May 72 with extended distribution) Old lists are NOT TO BE COPIED. They are to be corrected in their original form but using a different coloured pen to show what has been done-always date new uses of these lists also using the same colour pen as used for renulling or addition to them. When listing you always note down F, BDs, SF, LF, etc, next to the items. This is done AS YOU LIST. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.nt.rd Copyright © 1968, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 137. HCOB 28 SEP 68 REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1968 Remimeo Class VIII REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO Ordering people to Review for rehab or Review of grades when they are not ethics cases and no outness is found in the folder acts as an Invalidation of gains and can react seriously on a case. It must cease. A specific folder outness or a chronic low conditions case are the only reasons to review grades. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.ts Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 138. HCOB 20 SEP 68 GLEE HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1968 Remimeo Class VIII GLEE When you see glee on some fellow on a post, realize it's because he doesn't understand what he's doing. He's ignorant about something and above that is confusion and above the confusion you see glee. People who make fun of a serious needful action or duty just don't dig it, that's all. There are remedies. There's instruction or Remedy B. And these should be used. But this glee is nevertheless a kind of insanity. Freud mentioned that people who couldn't understand something sometimes giggled in an embarrassed kind of way. I rarely take any data from him but in this case, he was right. It was a good observation. However, he had no cure for it. You can get a whole area into a kind of glee when they don't grasp what they are doing. If you see somebody in glee, get a Remedy B run on them in Qual. Glee is a special kind of embarrassed giggling. You'll know it when you see it. L. RON HUBBARD LRH :jp.rd Copyright ©1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 139. HCOB 22 SEP 68 CLASS VIII "Auditors must always...." HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII Auditors must always put the pc's grade or OT level very prominently on the Auditing Report. A Case Supervisor cannot properly C/S a case without having this data. To not do this is out admin and gets Liability. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 140. HCOB 25 SEP 68 CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1968 (Reissued broadly 5 Oct '72) Remimeo SHSBC Class Vl Class IV GF-40XRR CHECKSHEET CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS A listing question used to handle the continuous present time overt question on the Green Form is: "What are you trying to prevent?" This is listed and follows all listing and nulling rules and lists to one item reading. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.nt.rd Copyright © 1968, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 141. HCOB 26 SEP 68 "The study of the 'Well Done' LRH C/Sed Folders..." HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1968 Class VIII The study of the "Well Done" LRH C/S Folder-the actual sessions themselves, makes the difference between a probable six months or 3-week course. This is the difference between making auditors and not making auditors and anyone who removes them from the line will be shot. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp Copyright © 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 142. HCOB 11 APR 77 LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1977 Remimeo Level III Level IV Snr Class IV Ex Dn All Cl IV Auditors LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF It has been found that the correction of lists, a very vital piece of tech, has been a source of confusion in the field as it apparently has never been written up in an issue. It really is simple if you know your Laws of L & N. VERIFYING A LIST The correct procedure for verifying/correcting past L & Ns is to check the items as to whether or not they are correct. Then do an L4BRA on each list where the item is found to be incorrect. You would have to orient the pc to the listing question and the item. You do not direct the question to see if it read. And don't just do an L4BRA and then not find the right item for the pc as part of the handling (unless the question proves to be uncharged or some such). NULLING A LIST One nulls a list when he doesn't get a BD F/N item on listing. The Laws of L & N strictly apply. An L4BRA would be used if the action bogs with still no item found. One would also null lists the pc made where no item had been found such as a 2WC which turned into a listing action with the pc giving off items or a list the pc somehow made while not on a meter. In these cases there is no item to verify with the pc as correct. Just cull the items into a list, work out with the pc what the question was if it's not already noted, and null the list. RECONSTRUCTING A LIST Sometimes you just don't have the list and can't get it or it's an old Why Finding or PTS interview for which there are no worksheets. In this case you get from the pc what the question was and then get him to give you the items that were already on the list as the item probably was already on the list and you don't want the pc to get into newly listing the question in PT and then getting into an overlisting situation. Just get him to give you the items he had already put on the list and more often than not you will get a BD F/N item. If you don't get the item that way then you can extend the list. SELF-LISTING Watch it on these as every random stray thought a person has about "why this or that" does not mean it's a self-list. But do look for it on a person who is manifesting the horrendous BPC an out list can generate, who is introspected or has been trying to figure out who is doing him in after just having seen the Ethics Officer. Just don't get into trying to make a list out of some non-standard listing question that won't give you an item. And actually the usual reason for self-listing is a prior wrong L & N item or an item not found. People will self-list to try to find the right item. So find and correct the earlier out list. LIST CORRECTION BLOW-UP When you are going along correcting lists and suddenly you get a big pc blow-up and it is not resolving on the list you are correcting you had better quickly realize that you probably are not correcting the list that is out and you'd better find out which list it is. There is usually an earlier out list to be found, if the list you are correcting does not resolve the upset. LISTS NOT READING When you start getting key lists such as Grades III and IV not reading and no items found it's time for that auditor to get a thorough overhaul on his metering, eyesight and to get off all his MUs on L & N. You also could be setting the pc up for a self-listing situation as he has been given the listing question but no item has been found. So be very sure the question did not read even with Suppress and Inval and TRs were in before getting off a key L & N process. USE OF L4BRA The prepared list L4BRA corrects L & N lists. It can be run on old lists, current lists, general listing. When a pc is ill after a listing and nulling session or up to 3 days after, always suspect that a listing action done on the pc had an error in it and get those lists corrected. Sometimes it is obvious what the error was per the Laws of Listing and Nulling. For example there could be two reading items left on the list in which case you would know to extend the list as it has been underlisted. If this didn't go, then an L4BRA would be done on the list. HANDLING AN L4BRA You handle reading questions on the L4BRA by the directions under the question that read. You don't just 2WC these questions. For example say question 4 read on the L4BRA, "Is a list incomplete? SF." You then ask the pc, "What list is incomplete?" Locate it and get it completed to a BD F/N item. You don't just 2WC "incomplete lists" to an F/N and leave it at that. By the way the L4BRA is missing a line which is "Was it the first item on the list?" This is being added as it's quite common that it is the first item and is most often missed. DO IT RIGHT An out list can create more concentrated hell with a pc than any other single auditing error. So it's imperative that listing errors get properly corrected. The best thing to do is to have the Laws of Listing and Nulling drilled line by line and down cold and just do it right in the first place. Then you will also see at once where old lists violated these laws and you will not be yourself doing lists that have to be corrected later. L. RON HUBBARD Founder Assisted by CS-4/5 LRH:JE:dr Copyright © 1977 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 143. HCOB 30 SEP 68 LISTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1968 Remimeo L&N Chksht Class VIII (Reissued 8 May 1972 with extended distribution) LISTS When doing a correction of lists in a folder to get the correct item and clean the folder up, these rules apply- 1. Get one F/N per type of list. Example: 3 S & Ds type U are in the folder-you get the item on the first S & D and an F/N-leave the other two. 2. You can get F/Ns on S & D types WSU, Rem Bs old, new and environment. But only on each type. 3. To go for any more on one type is dangerous and should not be done. This whole procedure should be done only if ordered by the C/S. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.nt.rd Copyright © 1968, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 144. HCOB 20 APR 72 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972 Issue II Remimeo C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION Where untrained Auditors are finding Whys for a Danger Formula, or post purposes or post products as called for in the Est O System you will get a certain amount of error and case disturbance. Such upsets also come from word clearing by incompetent persons. The C/S should look for these especially when such campaigns are in progress. He should suspect them as a possibility when a case bogs. A C/S must be sure all such papers and worksheets get into pc's folders. A common repair action is to 1. Do an assessment for type of charge. 2. Handle the charge found by the assessment done. 3. Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by 2wc or direct handling. 4. Suspect LISTING ERRORS on any Why or purpose or product found even though no list exists and reconstruct the list and L4B and handle it. 5. Handle word clearing of any type in or out of session with a Word Clear Correction List done in session by an Auditor. 6. When word clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn't clean up suspect he has been thrown into implants which are mostly words or the words in some engram. As Implants are actually just engrams, handle it with an L3B. LISTING Any item found out of session or by a non-auditor is suspect of being a Listing and Nulling (L&N) error even though no list was made. TODAY A CORRECT L&N ITEM MUST BD AND F/N. So treat such items as you would list errors and try to reconstruct the list and either confirm the item or locate the real item (may have been invalidated and suppressed) or extend the list and get the real item. The real item will BD F/N. One can establish what the situation is with a post purpose, a Why or a product or any other such item by doing an L4B. SELF AUDITING The commonest reason for self auditing is a wrong or unfound L&N item. People can go around and self list or self audit trying to get at the right Why or product or purpose after an error has been made. REACTION NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A WRONG LIST. Even, rarely, a DIANETIC LIST can produce wrong list reactions. Ask the pc for his somatics and he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor. ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc come from out lists. Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even illness. OUT LISTS Therefore when one gets a sharp change in a case (like lowered tone, violence, blows, "determination to go on in spite of the supervisor", long notes from pcs, self C/Sing, etc, etc, the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT LIST. This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the item was said to BD F/N. It can occur in "Coffee shop" (out of session auditing of someone), or by Est Os or poorly trained or untrained staff members or even in life. PTS When such actions as finding items by non-auditors are done on PTS people the situation can be bad, so one also suspects the person to be PTS to someone or something. "PTS" does not communicate well in an assessment question so one says, "Someone or something is hostile to you" and "You are connected to someone or something that doesn't agree with Dianetics or Scientology." REPAIRS The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a) that such situations as wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where untrained people are also using meters and (b) THAT IT IS UP TO THE C/S TO SUSPECT DETECT AND GET THEM HANDLED IN REGULAR SESSION. Do not ignore the possible bad influence. As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a correct answer to forbid such actions. It is a correct answer to require all such actions and worksheets become part of the folder. One can also persuade the D of T or Qual to gen in the people doing such actions. And do not ignore the effect such actions can have on cases and do not neglect to include them in C/Ses before going on with the regular program. They can all be repaired. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.rd Copyright © 1972 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 145. HCOB 23 SEP 68 DRUGS & TRIPPERS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1968 (Reissued 22 January 1972 as "Remimeo") Remimeo DRUGS & TRIPPERS Any case that won't run or won't rehab is probably a "tripper", meaning somebody who has taken drugs. Standard practice for anyone who has ever taken drugs or even alcohol is to rehabilitate the moments of releases in these. Drugs (or alcohol) give an enforced moment or period of release. It is surrounded in mass. LSD, marijuana (pot, hashish), peyote, opium, ether (in operations), nitrous oxide (laughing gas in dental operations), weird "biochemical" compounds used by "psychiatrists", Benzedrine, solid alcohol (canned heat), alcohol, turpentine, gasoline, witch herbs of various kinds, and even certain rays, in this lifetime and on the back track, could have caused a moment of release. Death does also but it's a bit steep to rehab. In a rehab session, or before such a this lifetime one is audited on grades, the moments of release should be rehabbed. The C/S directs this to be done before a rehab of ARC Straight Wire. Such releases usually need rehabbing only once. Tough rehabbing and probably all "Black Vs" probably trace to these chemical "releases". They are deadly because they give the sensation of release while actually pulling in mass. When "All black" reads on a GF one of these chemical release periods is probably in restim. These "Chemical releases" give us a lot of trouble unless (a) detected and (b) rehabbed. Such pcs often withhold the fact (non-acceptable or discreditable datum) quite madly and thus make detection difficult unless directly asked for on a hard to run case. Such persons can also be a mess on III if the chemical period rehabs aren't done. Delusory or dub-in cases also sometimes trace to chemical "releases". Painkillers, tranquilizers or morphine can also be explored where no "drug taking" is traced. All the above come under the heading of forceful exteriorization and can inhibit the act of exteriorization on V. Such pcs are a bit blank, irresponsible or detached. Each TYPE of chemical which produced "release" must be rehabbed and it is best to count how many times released on each type. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.mes.rd Copyright ©1968, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 146. HCOB 20 SEP 78 LX LIST HANDLING HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978 Issue II Class IV Grad Check sheets Snr VI (Cancels and replaces BTB 26 Nov 71, Issue III OUT OF VALENCE - 220H and BTB 25 Mar 72R URGENT IMPORTANT LX3 HANDLING REVISED AND REISSUED. This bulletin does not change in any way the Class VIII data on LX Lists or Out of Valence handling.) LX LIST HANDLING Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 RA II NED Series 6RA R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS HCOB 5 Nov 69R LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2) HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX2 HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX1 (CONDITIONS) HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS In handling Out of Valence from the GF 40 or the Expanded GF 40RD the LX Lists are used in this order: LX3, LX2, LX1 and if necessary, the last step, 220H. END PHENOMENA The end phenomena of the LX Lists is a remarkable valence shift. The pc will cognite on having been out of valence and will become himself. It is a cognition on beingness, not doingness or havingness that indicates the EP of the LX Lists. DO NOT OVERRUN A PC PAST THIS POINT. PROCEDURE Clear each word on the list before assessing it and note any instant reads which appear while clearing the item. These are valid reads. (Ref: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS) Assess the list Method 5 and take up the largest reading item. Run each recall flow of that item, then check with the pc to see if he is interested in running it R3RA. Handle each flow of the item to EP. After a complete handling of the item handle the lesser reading items (if any) as above. LX3 ATTITUDES LX3 is the first list assessed. Run reading LX3 items 3 Way or Quad Recalls and 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA. Use the following commands: Recalls: F1: Recall a time you took the attitude of _______. F2: Recall a time you caused another to take the attitude of _______. F3: Recall a time others caused others to take the attitude of _______. F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to take the attitude of _______. Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you took the attitude of _______. F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your causing another to take the attitude of _______. F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others causing others to take the attitude of _______. F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you causing yourself to take the attitude of _______. LX2 EMOTIONS LX2 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA as above, substituting the reading emotion for the attitude. LX1 CONDITIONS LX1 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA using the following commands: Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were _______. F2: Recall a time you caused another to be _______. F3: Recall a time others caused others to be _______. F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be _______. Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you were _______. F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your causing another to be _______. F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others causing others to be _______. F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you causing yourself to be _______. Note: On items "grief" and "loss" the command would be "Recall a time you had (a) _______." and "Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you had (a) _______.", etc. 220H 220H is done after completing LX3, LX2 and LX1 if the pc has not experienced a remarkable valence shift and had a valence cognition. If the valence shift and cognition occur any time during the handling of the LX Lists, that is the end phenomena for LX handling and all further actions connected with LX Lists handling are ceased. 220H is run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA, using the following commands: Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were being someone else. F2: Recall a time you caused another to be someone else. F3: Recall a time others caused others to be someone else. F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be someone else. Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you were being someone else. F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your causing another to be someone else. F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others causing others to be someone else. F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you causing yourself to be someone else. Each recall flow is run to F/N, cognition and VGIs. Each engram flow must go to F/N, postulate and VGIs. (This will be the erasure.) If you encounter any trouble, use an L3RF. Done correctly, LX Lists will bring about some very major changes in your pc. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:kjm Copyright © 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 147. HCOB 2 AUG 69 r. 4 Sep 78 "LX" LISTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 2 AUGUST 1969R REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978 (Revisions in this type style) (Ellipses indicate deletions) Cl IV Grad Checksheets Snr Cl VI Checksheets C/Ses (Class VIII tapes contain much data on Out of Valence handling. This Bulletin, formerly Class VIII distribution, has been revised to present a procedure whereby Snr Class IV and VI auditors can do LX Lists and Out of Valence handling on their pus. This revision in no way revises Class VIII data.) "LX" LISTS There are now three "LX" Lists: LX3-Attitudes LX2-Emotions LX1-Conditions. Originally they were called "X" because they were experimental. They still are to some extent so the X is retained. These serve to isolate REASONS A BEING IS CHARGED UP TO SUCH an extent that he is OUT OF VALENCE. When a person is out of valence he does not easily as-is his bank. These lists are assessed Method 5. The best reading item (and then subsequently reading items) are taken up and run by: 3-Way or Quad Recalls 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA... END PHENOMENA We now have a new discovery. I have found that a person who is out of valence ex-periences, when run on LX1 lists (and now the others above, LX2 and LX3) and 220H, a remarkable valence shift if he is run on enough items. In one fashion or another he comments on this in session. This is the end phenomena of Out of Valence processes (the LX items and 220H). It is always attained if enough items are run. Quite ordinary cases are out of valence. If their folder gets too fat you can assume they are out of valence. Perverts, suppressives and critical, snide, ruthless, arrogant or contemptuous per-sonalities are always out of valence. A person who is in treason on the 1st dynamic is always out of valence. So whether GF No. 40 (h) OUT OF VALENCE reads or not, if the folder is fat, you play safe and assess and run LX items until the person has the Valence cognition. Without being coached, a person who is out of valence always has the cognition if he is run on enough items and 220H. USE OF LISTS One begins with LX3. He assesses it Method 5 and takes the item that read best, handles it, then the item that read next best, and so on down the list. If no EP, LX2 is taken up and handled in the same manner, then LX1. 220H is the last step of Out of Valence handling if the EP has not yet been reached. Today you can assume safely that anyone out of valence can be put in valence quietly and efficiently with LX items and 220H if he is audited and if the auditing is standard. This is quite a worthwhile development as it resolves the heavily overcharged case. A symptom of a heavily charged case is F/Ning too quickly to be processed well. Using these lists on a pc is not a critical action. Even (and especially) children are too overcharged to be easily audited. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ldm.rd.dr Copyright © 1969, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 148. HCOB 5 NOV 69 r. 4 Sep 78 LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1969R Issue V (HCOB 4 Aug 69 Amended and Revised) REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978 (Revisions in this type style) Class IV Grad Checksheets Snr C/ass VI Checksheets C/Ses LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2) Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS HCOB 26 Jun 78 RA II NED Series 6RA R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS HCOB 20 Sep 78 LX LIST HANDLING 3 Way or Quad Recall 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA Date: __________________________________ Pc Name:_______________________________ Treachery ___________ Disloyalty ___________ Helplessness ___________ Hostility ___________ Rudeness ___________ Cruelty ___________ Disobedience ___________ Rebelliousness ___________ Wastefulness ___________ Stinginess ___________ Cowardliness ___________ Dirtiness ___________ Ungodliness ___________ Wickedness ___________ Cunning ___________ Criticism ___________ Falsity ___________ Pretense ___________ Glee ___________ Laughter ___________ Mockery ___________ Embarrassment ___________ Feeling Hurt ___________ Oppressive ___________ Ridicule ___________ Good ___________ Persecution ___________ Betrayal ___________ Guilt ___________ L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ldm.rs.rd.kjm Copyright © 1969, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 149. HCOB 3 AUG 69 r. 22 Aug 78 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 3 AUGUST 1969R REVISED 22 AUGUST 1978 (Revisions in this type style) (Ellipses indicate deletions) Cl IV Grad Checksheets Snr Cl VI Checksheets C/Ses LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST (To be done before LX1) 3 Way or Quad Recall 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING Date: _____________________________________ Pc Name:__________________________________ Apprehension ____________ Fear ____________ Hate ____________ Agitation ____________ Shame ____________ Blame ____________ Regret ____________ Grief ____________ Remorse ____________ Sorrow ____________ Sadness ____________ Despondency ____________ Depressed ____________ Despair ____________ Anger ____________ Rage ____________ Greed ____________ Haughty ____________ Arrogant ____________ Cold ____________ Contemptuous ____________ Hostility ____________ Resentment ____________ Antagonism ____________ Boredom ____________ Conservatism ____________ Enthusiasm ____________ Proud ____________ Elation ____________ Serenity ____________ Unemotional ____________ L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rs.rd.jk Copyright © 1969, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 150. HCOB 9 AUG 69 r. 4 Nov 78 LX1 (CONDITIONS) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1969R REVISED 21 AUGUST 1978 REISSUED 4 NOVEMBER 1978 (Revisions in this type style) (Ellipsis indicates deletion) Class IV Grad Checksheet Snr Class VI Checksheet C/Ses LX1 (CONDITIONS) (Formerly issued to Class VIII auditors as a research list on 5 October 1968) Used after LX3 and LX2. 3 Way or Quad Recall 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING Date: _____________________________________ Pc Name:__________________________________ Assessment for largest read. Overwhelmed ____________ Made Wrong ____________ Forced ____________ Frightened ____________ Suppressed ____________ Crushed ____________ Oppressed ____________ Denied ____________ Overpowered ____________ Overthrown ____________ Defeated ____________ Destroyed ____________ Vanquished ____________ Wiped Out ____________ Annihilated ____________ Changed ____________ Identified ____________ Recognized ____________ Driven Out ____________ Driven Away ____________ Grief ____________ Loss ____________ L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rs.rd.kjm Copyright © 1969, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 151. HCOPL 7 APR 70 r. 8 Dec 78 GREEN FORM HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1970RB REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978 (Revisions not printed in a different type style) Remimeo Class IV Grad Checksheet Class VI Checksheet Class IV Grad Auditors C/Ses GREEN FORM The Green Form is used to detect the peculiarities and elements of a pc's life which are causing case trouble or preventing gains. (It is not used to cure high or low TA.) You can assess it Method 3 and handle, not going beyond the first F/N, but its real use is Method 5 and send to the C/S for programming. It can also be used in combination with the Expanded Green Form 40RD to precisely locate and solve any resistiveness of a pc's case. Directions for use of the Green Form and the Expanded Green Form 40RD are given in HCOB 8 December 78 11, GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF. It is vital, before using these lists, that any auditor or C/S first checks out on the above issue. PC NAME: DATE:_______________ AUDITOR: ______________________________________ 1A. HAVE YOU NOT HAD SUFFICIENT SLEEP? _________ 1B. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY TIRED? _________ 1C. HAVE YOU NOT HAD ENOUGH FOOD? _________ 1D. ARE YOU HUNGRY? _________ 1E. HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________ IF. HAVE YOU TAKEN ASPIRIN? _________ 1G. HAVE YOU TAKEN TRANQUILIZERS? _________ 1H. HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS? _________ Do not audit a pc who has not had sufficient food or rest or who has taken aspirin or drugs. If one of the above questions reads, assess no further; take the question up with the pc. If he is tired, send him home to rest, if he is hungry, send him to get well fed, and if he has taken drugs, he will have to dry out for the time specified in HCOB 17 Oct 69RA, DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS. 2A. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING? _________ If the pc is Clear, Dianetic Clear or OT and has not had an Int RD, do the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series 4R. Do not run any Dianetics. Otherwise, if the pc has never had an Int RD, give him a standard Int RD per Int Series 2. 2B. HAS YOUR INT RD BEEN MESSED UP? _________ Do an Int RD Correction List Revised (HCOB 29 Oct 71RA). If Int Correction has already been done on the pc get an FES of the Int RD and its corrections. When all errors are corrected the C/S may order the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series 4R. 3. HAS THERE BEEN A LIST ERROR? _________ Find out which and handle with an L4BRA. 4A. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________ Handle with ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. 4B. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK WITH THE ENVIRONMENT? _________ ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N or Remedy B if ordered by the C/S. (Ref: BTB 14 Aug 68R, REMEDY B-ENVIRONMENT AND "NEW STYLE.") 4C. DO YOU HAVE A PRESENT TIME PROBLEM? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 4D. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? _________ Get what, who nearly found out, what they did to miss it, E/S M/W/H to F/N. 4E. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _________ Who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate it was a false read. 2WC the concern. 4F. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT? _________ Pull it, E/S to F/N. 5. ARE YOU EXPERIMENTING? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 6. ARE YOU ALTERING TECH? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 7. ARE YOU DOING SOMETHING ELSE WITH TECH? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 8. HAVE YOU TYPED, HANDWRITTEN OR TAPED COPIES OF ANY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 9. ARE YOU HERE TO GET DATA FOR SOMEONE ELSE? _________ Get what, when, all, who E/S to F/N. 10. DO YOU HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD OR CRIMES FOR WHICH YOU COULD BE ARRESTED? _________ Note all crimes, with what, when, all and who and handle with E/S to F/N. 11. ARE YOU HERE TO BE CURED OF SOMETHING NOT MENTIONED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 12. DO YOU HAVE UNPAID DEBTS TO ORGS? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 13. DO YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF A CRIME AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY? _________ Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N. 14. ARE THERE IGNORED ORIGINATIONS? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 15. HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING! _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or L1C on the prior upset. If prior upset was in auditing, use the appropriate correction list. 16A. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED BY A NONSTANDARD AUDITOR? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 16B. HAS THERE BEEN A NONSTANDARD PROCESS? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 16C. HAS THERE BEEN A BAD AUDITING COMM CYCLE? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. L1C if necessary. 16D. HAVE THERE BEEN CODE BREAKS? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 17A. IS THERE AN ENGRAM IN RESTIMULATION? _________ L3RF and handle. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the read. You may do an L3RF if needed, however. do no handling beyond indicating the read. See HCOB 30 Oct 78 C/S Series 53, USE OF for further data on handling reading Dianetic items on Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears.) 17B. IS A PICTURE NOT ERASED? _________ Handle as in 17A above. 18. IS THERE AN ENGRAM EXACTLY MATCHING PT DANGERS? _________ Run it out Triple or Quad. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in 17A above.) 19. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further handling if needed. 20. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further handling if needed. 21. IS THERE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MENACE? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S. 22. ARE YOU HERE BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE DEMANDED IT? _________ 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S. 23A. DO YOU HAVE A HIDDEN STANDARD? _________ L&N "What hasn't been handled?" L&N "Who or what would have (item above) ?" Run O/W on the item. 23B. WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR YOU TO KNOW SCIENTOLOGY WORKS? _________ Handle as in 23A above. 24. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF SCIENTOLOGY WORKED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 25. CAN'T YOU STUDY? _________ Assess and handle a Study Green Form. 26. HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 27. HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 28. HAS ANYTHING BEEN EVALUATED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 29. HAS ANYTHING BEEN RUSHED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 30. HAS ANYTHING BEEN MISSED? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 31. HAS A PROCESS BEEN LEFT UNFLAT? _________ 2WC for data to F/N. Return to C/S. 32. HAS A PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN? _________ Rehab. 33. HAS A RELEASE BEEN BYPASSED? _________ Rehab. 34. HAVE YOU BEEN OVERREPAIRED? _________ Repair Correction List. 35. HAVE YOU GONE DIANETIC CLEAR? _________ Date/Locate. 36. IS THERE ANYTHING UPSETTING ABOUT THIS REVIEW? _________ Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. 37. IS THIS LIST UNNECESSARY? _________ Indicate. If no F/N rehab or Date/Locate. 38. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED? _________ Find out what and handle or return to the C/S. 39. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________ Find out what and handle or return to C/S. RESISTIVE CASES ASSESSMENT Assess Method 5 the following resistive cases. If any item reads, go to its corresponding section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD and assess Method 5 all the items in that section. Assess the section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD that corresponds to each reading item. When all sections corresponding to the reading resistive cases items are assessed you will have a full picture of the pc's resistiveness. Then, if you have C/S okay, take up each reading section on the EXGF 40RD in the order in which they are listed below and handle reads per the instructions given. Otherwise, return to the C/S for programming. A-1. WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED _________ A-2. HAD ENGRAMS RUN AFTER BEING DIANETIC CLEAR _________ B. DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _________ C. AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT _________ D. OVERWHELMED _________ E. CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _________ F-1. SUPPRESSED _________ F-2. CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON _________ G. SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL _________ H. HAS NOT HAD AUDITING _________ I-1. SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________ I-2. HAS TAKEN DRUGS _________ J. FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY _________ K. HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES _________ L-1. OUT OF VALENCE _________ L-2. ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE _________ M. PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED _________ N. AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _________ O. MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING _________ L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nc Copyright (c) 1970, 1974, 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ************** 152. HCOB 25 NOV 71 RESISTIVE CASES - FORMER THERAPY HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 NOVEMBER 1971 Issue II REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974 (Only change is signature) Remimeo GF-40X Checksheet (HCO Bulletin of 23 September 1968, a Class VIII Confidential Bulletin edited and reissued for information of Auditors handling GF-40. NOTE: This does not cancel or replace HCOB 23 Sept 1968 which contains further vital data for the Class VIII Auditor.) RESISTIVE CASES FORMER THERAPY Hypnotism, "psycho" analysis, "psychiatry" and other implant type therapies often key in and jam the track. These characters here, on any other planet and on the whole track dramatize implanting. The "therapy" involved would be a temporary relief brought by suggestion. The wrong data of the "science" itself operates as a whole track lie. Getting well or able depends on establishing truth. These "scientific" lies are alterations of actual laws. We often note electronics men have a rough case time. This traces to the lies Man uses for his "electrical science". As the subject is based on false assumptions, it itself tends to aberrate. Therefore we get out of the road any former "therapy". We can rehab any moment of release in it, handle any overrun, etc. We also do a New Style Remedy B to get old therapies spotted and run back. The only cases which hang up are: 1. Unaudited cases (lies about grades, etc). 2. Drug cases (who seek in processing the delusions or madness which exhilarated them on drugs). 3. Former therapy cases. (In this or past lives.) 4. Out of valence cases. 5. Cases who continue to commit overts on Scn. 6. Cases "audited" with their ruds or grades out. 7. Seriously physically ill cases (where the illness makes too much PTP in PT). Of all these the former therapy case is apt to be the roughest as any auditing session can be reactively mistaken for the "treatment". The next roughest is the drug case as a false exteriorization often occurs on an enforced basis and may go into restim. Some drug takers go plowing back into early implants and drug therapies so the two get crossed up on a case. To isolate the reason for a highly resistive case or high TA you can assess the above 7 items and get a clue. Don't limit it to this lifetime. And don't do it so as to key the person in hard on things he wasn't in. And don't do it unless the case is very hard to get a gain on. Engram running of a crude sort can be found hundreds, thousands or billions of years ago and consists if it appears, of an overrun. They didn't know much about it and overran them badly. Implants, psychoanalysis, psychiatry, hypnotism get all snarled up with sex as these birds would commonly (and do) stage insane sex scenes. They violate the children and wives of officials even today to produce a degrade and to make a scene so insane that the "patient" if he remembers it really thinks he is insane. And if he tries to tell anybody (or if she tries to tell her husband) it's a prompt mess, so these "practitioners" hide their activities in this fashion. The trouble with such former "therapies" and electric shock, etc, is that it: (a) groups track by the command of the practitioner (b) sends the pc to the start of track WAY back and sticks him there out of PT. The keynote of piloting through messes like this is to (A) Know what kind of a mess it is and (B) Don't EVER force a pc back track or into anything he doesn't want to confront easily. Drugs force the person back into these messes and stick him. One of these former therapy or drug messes is only hard to untangle because they are full of incredibles. The pc doesn't accept them or just try to see what's in them. The basic rule in any case is Reality is proportional to the amount of charge removed and so Reality can be increased simply by removing charge. These surges of the needle as well as the BDs of the TA are "charge coming off". Anything eventually resolves if the pc just keeps on getting charge off. The earliest charge is the most important. Charge off the exact grades is the most valuable. But ANY charge off will make it, even on former "therapies". L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.bh.rd Copyright © 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED **************