Subject: Re: time shifts From: David Mayo Date: 1996/05/13 Message-Id: <4n8eqt$dl0@light.lightlink.com> Sender: electra@light.lightlink.com Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 11 May 1996 10:32:26 -0600, anon47fa@nyx.cs.du.edu (tritium) wrote: >in _lonesome squirrel_, fishman cognites that time shifts can happen >when the thetan picks up a new body. that is, when he goes to >the between-lives implant station, his new body can be on any >time track. steve's fear was getting a new body in a previous time, This is not part of any of Scientology(tm)'s teachings, beliefs or practices. They only think of time as linear --with a beginning and then everything follows sequentially and precisely. I have never heard of a scientologist having the idea expressed above. I am not stating that Fishman did not have that idea, just that I never encountered it and I consider the probability low. >where he wouldn't be able to continue up the bridge. steve received >a pilot rundown from l.ron, but continually got in trouble with >the rest of his scientology contacts because they'd never heard about >it, and as far as they were concerned fishman was squirreling the tech. I can believe that his contacts would think he was squirreling but I do not believe that he received a pilot rundown from Hubbard. > >but dennis erlich in a different thread confirmed (raised the issue?) >that parallel time tracks were indeed part of the tech, and his I don't think Dennis did or would have confirmed that parallel time tracks were part of the tech; they never were. Hubbard did tell a story about "bodies in pawn" and at another time he talked about a person having two different bodies concurrently (but only being in or operating one of these at a time --presumably while the other was asleep). In both stories, time was presumed linear, i.e., neither of these included or implied parallel universes or parallel time. >information had to (?) have come from a time before steve was involved >in scientology. > >so what's the story on time shifts or parallel time tracks or whatever >you want to call it being part of the tech? was it a particularly >esoteric part of the tech? was it eliminated at some point in time? Time shifts and parallel time tracks never were part of the "tech" esoteric or otherwise. Those ideas are also inconsistent with the basic Scientology(tm) belief that "it all" started with a postulate, the decision "to be", (rather than a big bang) as expressed in The Factors and in the first ten Scientology(tm) axioms. > >=== tritium (h3) ---- anon47fa@nyx.cs.du.edu >It's like the scieno way of confessing: to accuse. - Dennis Erlich, on a.r.s > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMZd/ROmCyCdNXuVZAQF7HwQAkmK/vRH2GYnMECmWr7ye4BneytXxqJ/p 0lFBsjHiCEwmodAxtKyCsU84di0xXaRtrvG9E6gk21ldtNVd3kQHvWM3eciUcvQo U76r47ilR7MZWGWTzdQdqwjD1j7JkQUr9+HKG8cWEOxvRaNmlohhWHFX08NoVaNI 7CDMFpakzQo= =92Jr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----