Subject: Re: SRCS attempts to dead agent Mayo From: David Mayo Date: 1996/05/15 Message-Id: <4nbl7l$pb0@light.lightlink.com> Sender: electra@light.lightlink.com Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Article Segment 1 of 2 (Get All 2 Segments) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 9 May 1996 20:47:22 UTC, an557846@anon.penet.fi (David Cooke) wrote: > >On Sun, 05 May 1996 smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel) wrote: > >>On Thu, 02 May 1996 22:29:05 -0400, Ed McCloskey >> wrote: > >>>dmorgan@cts.com wrote: > >>>>Would you care to mention Mayo's contributions >>>>to the technical side of Scientology >>>>that are still in place today? > >>>Nope. I haven't seen any useful creations of his. >>>It's interesting that Scientology bashers on ar$ >>>can support Mayo with a straight face. After all, >>>he claims to be the actual author of part of Scientology. > >>In an organization which regularly put Lumpy Ron's >>signature on other author's work, how would you know >>who wrote what?. Recall those Commodore Messengers who >>signed his name to orders he didn't write and the all >>those LRH Communicators who signed his name to SO-1 >>letters so the recipients believed they were receiving >>communication directly from Elron. > >L. Ron Hubbard made it very clear that all SO-1 mail was fowarded to him with >a reply already drafted by his staff. He would read the reply with the incoming >mail, sign if it was OK, or return it for rewriting if it was not. Not true. - From early on he didn't read or sign the SO #1 letters in the 1970s on the ship. Joyce Popham did. The the SO #1 Unit was formed. Alethia Taylor ran it for a while and you already heard, Cheryl Chopping. Ken Urquhart signed some of his letters too, as LRH Pers Com, and was in charge of the SO #1 Unit. At first, a rubber stamp was used. It didn't look at al authentic and so a clear plastic stencil was obtained --his signature was cut out of the plastic so that a ball point pen could be inserted and the signature faked so that members would think that they could always write to Ron and he would answer their letters Joyce Popham practiced his signature and was so good at it that she didn't need to use the stencil. Now all his letters could be signed with a ballpoint (instead of a rubber stamp.) Did you ever know Pat Brice and Julia Watson --you must have heard of Julia, a fellow countrywoman of yours.? > This is essentially the >procedure used by all high executives in government and business. >Deception? Hardly. (This may come as a shock, Neal, but even the letters >you write to Santa Claus have replies drafted for his signature by his helpers!) > >> How can you tell what Mayo wrote? > >There is an objective criterion. Standard tech is what has been found, over >many years and many cases, to work. It does not depend on any authority: it >exists objectively, like the laws of any science. Anything added to that tech, or >anything essential omitted, soon shows up in a lack of results - like a corrupted >or missing file in a software package. > So this means that if something "doesn't work" that proves it was written by Mayo and if something "does work" that proves it was written by El Ron. That's an extremely usual test. It has been suggested to me that Scientology(tm) needs "enemies" to explain away their failures. I see how that would "work", in fact I've seen it done with others. But that's another story that and it can wait until after May 18. >The real tech of Scientology is a logically consistent whole, and serious >departures from it stand out by their inconsistency as well as their unworkability. > So when someone says that Cooke: >rundowns can be shortened, Which rundowns are you saying that I shortened? Cooke: >or that solo auditors >needn't know their TRs, Yes, I take "full responsibility" for saying that right after Hubbard gave me a pep talk about it, the MOD (Messenger on Duty) gave me an order to do it and I sent the completed issues to Hubbard for his very own approval. But this is just you and me chatting about events that neither of us could prove. The proof would have been in the Mimeo files and in the CMO INT files and we can be sure DM had "Igor" take care of those. Have you ever met Igor, David? (Get Next Article Segment)