Subject: RJ38 ... but then, what would I know? From: David Mayo Date: 1996/05/15 Message-Id: <4nbl86$pcc@light.lightlink.com> Sender: electra@light.lightlink.com Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sun, 12 May 1996 07:29:30 UTC, an557846@anon.penet.fi (David Cooke) wrote: > >In <4mfhsi$fej@light.lightlink.com>, David Mayo wrote: > >>OK, specify which bulletins Hubbard issued in 1983 or 1984... > >Two examples from my collection (no doubt much smaller than yours). >Naturally, I wouldn't quote confidential bulletins even if I had any. > >HCOB 30 Jan 1973RD [Method 9 Word Clearing the Right Way] was revised >on 13 Sept 1980 without LRH's knowledge, introducing additives. LRH >corrected this in an issue of 16 May 1984. You are right about El Ron not being "on the lines" in Sep 1980 but on what basis do you say that I revised that M9 bulletin? Are you sure it was not Sue Koon in LRH Tech Comps under Melanie Murray. I thought it would have been since LRH Tech Comps, the unit set up to write "LRH HCOBs" (inserted to ensure the folks out there don't get any MUs), wrote or revised all the Word Clearing bulletins. Go on, tell me I'm wrong. > >HCOB 6 Dec 1979R [Solo Auditor Drills] was written by "another", included >made-up drills and omitted some real ones. Cancelled by LRH in HCOB of 10 >Mar 1984. > Excellent. Hubbard was living in the Mayfair apartments (or was it Mayflower apartments) in Hemet and so was I. My apartment was so close to his that I could hear him. Those were the days. Messenger sticks her head in the door, "Commodore wants to see you." I'd drop everything and run to his apartment. Hubbard had the "Int stat reports" and "Int stat graphs" and an "Invest" done to find why there weren't more people doing AO services. Because the AO GI was down. Someone had figured out that it was because no-one was graduating from the PRO TRs Curse and that was a prerequisite to the Solo Auditor's course. That was the "stop on the lines". Hubbard was furious. He had just added a vast amount of material to the PRO TRs Curse and here was someone suggesting it was too long?! He figured it out, someone had made the TRs Curse a prerequisite to the Solo Auditor's course. (Hey, David, you're right. The "tech" was as immutable as physical laws. If it was not working, someone else had been meddling with it. Take a win. El Ron was using the test you described, David. Wow. That's GREAT, David.) It had to be an earlier CS 4, didn't really matter which one or even if the TRs had been made a prereq by an earlier CS 4. 'Any old Who will do!' He sent me off to make up the drills for the solo students and the "corrections" to the checksheet etc., right away and then back up knock on his door, MOD appears, Solo revisions ready for The Commodore's approval. He approved them and out they went. I am the the Who for that, too? Ah well, 'Any old Who will do!' >>So you know what I am setting you up for, Hubbard wrote >>very few of the bulletins "correcting errors" over >>the years. > I think I gave you fair warning, above. >Since neither of us were in direct comm with L.Ron Hubbard at that time we >have a stalemate here: you can't prove that bulletins over LRH's name were >not issued by him, any more than I can prove that they were. But isn't it more I was in direct comm with him for the Solo Auditor Drills. Did you we designed the "Wings", too. The badge with Wings that the solo auditors get when they fly their ruds. Get it? *Fly* their ruds, *wings*, wink, wink, say no more. I was living in the same apartments he was (flats to you) in Hemet, from April 1979, until he suddenly flew into deeper hiding in Feb 1980. I had a lot of "direct comm" with him in those days. Had some meals with him, too. Played roulette with him that Xmas of 1979. Can you believe that? >rational to take them at face value (Occam's razor and all that, y'know), unless >one is so paranoid as to expect subterfuge and deception as a matter of >course. Their style is LRH's; their content agrees with what he had been >developing since 1950. More importantly, the tech that they re-establish is a >consistent whole, and workable. Anyone who has audited realises that >standard tech isn't an arbitrary: it is what works. To readers more familiar with >computer tech than auditing, I might compare it to a piece of software that does >fantastic things - but change just one byte in the right place and it won't run at all. David, my namesake, why do I get the feeling that you are leading up to something. A really heavy point that you were going to make. This line about "style", "consistent whole", "... developing since 1950." I hope I didn't wait too long to answer this post to spoil your timing. Wink, wink, say no more! >>>For instance, Mayo had introduced arbitraries into the >>>Grades Chart; so L. Ron Hubbard had to issue a >>>simplified and corrected Grades Chart in 1983. > >>Oh dear, could you name one or a few? > >My source for this is RJ38 (to Koos and anyone else who believes this tape >was made by an LRH sound-alike, I can only suggest we agree to differ). One Let me try to use my Sooper Powerz. Who's voice was on that tape. Thinking , thinking, thinking, gets out crystal ball, takes trip to ethics for mixing practices, comes back, tries to use Std. Tech to solve it, gets tempted to use "Mayo tech", Oh what the hell. Let's try some "Mayo tech". OK, *I'm* for that. No let's see, Who's voice was on that RJ38 tape? Blinding flash, loud series of snaps, and , woops, looks like I did a "time shift" there BWAHAHAHAHA, gets serious again. Now using "Mayo tech" Whose voice was on RJ38? Cliff Clifford. Husband of Amy Clifford. Wow. BIG WIN! Now how many people in the whole world knew that one? Did I just move the F*'ng. Marble or what!! Bows, gracefully and exits. (Until May 18th, wink, wink, say no more!) > >Only if you report to Ethics at the next amnesty, work your way up through the >conditions and become eligible for upper levels again. Of course, you could >still assert the bulletins were forgeries - there's no answer to that, is there? Where's my nearest "ethics terminal"? ML, David > > >David Cooke >cooke.david@pi.sa.gov.au Rev. David Mayo "So many have fallen, yet so far left to go ... " (finger for key) PGP ID: 1024/4D5EE559 1996/01/04 PGP Fingerprint: 0D 69 92 87 79 2F 38 72 FE 03 CE 51 31 D5 6D E9 ***************************************************************** -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMZlTTOmCyCdNXuVZAQHcUQP+NWnxw/HzUKGDtjbKDkfIrpQLU5/w9+SZ s1Z87ZgXytOWtblbb6yppFGDF4omhTr6PEVxnM7XIXoxOKg7RmzjX/rNnMsaDATq VTMfYVUN7GF9LU2rC2PzJSBw1yOJB75VqBqwA+J0O/ILkZBxYuDF0A13UWgB8qNl QE1qpm31mY0= =CvuC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----