Subject: Re: Whip's legal lesson From: mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) Date: 1996/02/02 Message-Id: <4esnmc$i90@light.lightlink.com> Sender: electra@light.lightlink.com Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Whippersnapper wrote: > >In message <4ejh14$kgm@light.lightlink.com>, >mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote: > >>Whippersnapper wrote: > >>>In message <199601240856.DAA25574@light.lightlink.com>, >>>mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote: > >>>>Whippersnapper wrote: > >>>>>mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote: > >>[...] >>>>>>>>What wrong was David Mayo supposedly trying to right? The guy >>>>>>>>did vast damage and was thrown out of the Church. I *saw* some >>>>>>>>of that damage, very, very, VERY directly. >>[...] >>>The talk over meals had mainly to do with Confessionals and some very >>>specific point of technical practice that was a tad beyond my ken, >>>but considered diametrically opposed to LRH's data on same. > >>What you are describing is second or third hand information which you >>didn't even understand. > >Direct contact with persons directly involved whom I've known for years >and have every reason to trust is enough for me. In any case, I was not >referring to these technical matters in that statement you quoted. > Then you now admit that your statement above, "I *saw* some of that damage, very, very, VERY directly." was false. I think this is a prima facie case of malicious defamation. > >>Did you see any damage directly? Do you now >>publicly retract your original statement? > >I saw enough. And no, any retraction would be false. > And you here refuse to retract. So be it. > >>>>>Later I was part of a unit producing public services. Your >>>>>"office," in the person of a slightly stupid and constantly-ill >>>>>"missionaire," inexplicably extended its tentacles to that unit and >>>>>almost instantly halted its work and tore it apart. >>[...] > >>>>I didn't send out any "missionaires". Missionaires were sent by >>>>either Action FB or Action CMO INT, which was probably being run >>>>by John Nelson or David Miscavige or Jon Horwich at the time. Do >>>>you recall the slightly stupid and constantly-ill"missionaire"'s >>>>name and what year this was? The public services unit was in >>>>existence prior to me having anything to do with it. Perhaps the >>>>missionaire went there before I knew of it. Give me a name. > >>>This guy called himself a "missionaire" and his contact in your >>>office his "ops." He carried a hand-typed and photocopied set of >>>"project orders." Of course you weren't responsible. > >>Are you being facetious? > >Yes. Wilful mailicious intent. > > >>Correct. I was not responsible. I did not have any missionaires, >>I did not send out any missionaires, and what's more I had no guy(s) >>working in my office. Now retract your statements AND state the >>"missionaire"'s name, for the record, if there was one. >> [...] >No, I will not name him. It serves no purpose, despite the damage he did >on orders he said came from you directly. Perhaps you'll recall him on >your own. As I said there was no such person. I repeat I had no missionaire(s) and there was no male working in my office or unit. > >- Whippersnapper David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMRHfe+mCyCdNXuVZAQGjyAP+OtxY/gVQKJB2dmVFkpKQCFTa7b1PwuOG p34nxp+FOb/W5Vv7bv0e+ItrJ6sZ3DtQiIKjMgzmrL52ioMiN8JAT+m1I25wTJzc MImyAmYL5yBIcHix79n2wrgkG6Of7KOq4NcUfJghfE/qb34mpvgS5bpNDyzYA/R6 +verTAaO5cY= =jgOL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ******************************* David Mayo (finger for key) PGP ID: 1024/4D5EE559 1996/01/04 David Mayo PGP Fingerprint: 0D 69 92 87 79 2F 38 72 FE 03 CE 51 31 D5 6D E9 *****************************************************************