From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Jun 04 18:56:46 1999 Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!news-out.uswest.net!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news Date: 5 Jun 1999 01:56:46 -0000 Subject: FZBA 3/14 SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology Message-ID: <3aeb06fc889d4e6a05023a9c1160424b@anonymous.poster> Sender: Secret Squirrel Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to . The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable. From: Secret Squirrel Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net Lines: 2075 Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:801326 alt.clearing.technology:83828 FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 3 ************************************************** The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of: 1. The Old Tech Volumes 2. The New Tech Volumes 3. Confidential Material 4. BTBs 5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech 6. Anything else appropriate that we can find They do not include a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those) b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately) Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice as much material as the old tech volumes), and because the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each year as a separate volume. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** 040 HCOB 14 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-ROUTINE 3, ARC BREAKS, HANDLING OF (TV5 p. 251-4, NTV VII p. 62-7) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 14 MARCH 1963 Central Orgs Franchise URGENT ROUTINE 2 - ROUTINE 3 ARC BREAKS, HANDLING OF (HCO Secs: Check this out thoroughly on all students and staff. D of T: Use this drill early in Practical, add to all Check Sheets.) Some day you will be awfully glad you read and learned this HCO Bulletin. The only things that can ruin the future of R2 and R3 are: 1. ARC Breaks because of bad R2 and R3; and 2. The Sad Effect. THE ARC BREAK There is nothing more nerve-racking to an auditor than an R2 or R3 ARC Break. They are not like other ARC Breaks from a common missed withhold. They are nerve-shattering and far reaching in consequence. If you can't handle an R2 or R3 ARC Break you have no business using the techniques as you'll wrap more than one pc around a telephone pole. The only real damage R2 and R3 can do to a case is when one fails to handle an R2 or R3 ARC Break. Good R2 or R3 repairs bad R2 or R3, but one sometimes has to be awfully clever to repair a case once the auditor has let an ARC Break go by. Indeed, so important is the ARC Break in R2 and R3 that it is actually used as one means of testing the correctness of the R2 or R3. CAUSE OF ARC BREAKS The untried auditor is always sure the R2 or R3 ARC Break happens because of auditing blunders (Mid Ruds, etc), failure to pull ordinary missed withholds or auditor auditing goofs. This is not true. The truth is that R2 and R3 ARC Breaks are caused by a mistake in Goals, Items or GPMs, and that's the whole cause. The pc, however, unable to grasp this, turns his reasoning upon the auditor and blames the auditing. Therefore, this rule must be thoroughly learned and experienced by the auditor before he or she is "safe" in auditing R2 and R3. ARC BREAK RULE IN R2 AND R3 WHEN THE PC CRITICIZES OR ATTACKS THE AUDITOR OR GOES INTO GRIEF OR APATHY, AN R2 OR R3 ERROR HAS JUST OCCURRED. THE AUDITOR MUST IGNORE THE PC'S STATEMENTS AS TO THE CAUSE OF THE ARC BREAK AND QUICKLY REMEDY THE R2 OR R3 AND DO NOTHING ELSE. There are no exceptions to this rule in R2 and R3. The auditor, having goofed in some other way, is liable to see reason in what the pc is saying, do something like missed withholds or Mid Ruds and drive the ARC Break into heights that can make the pc much more upset. MID RUD RULE IN AN R2 OR R3 ARC BREAK, MISSED WITHHOLDS AND MID RUDS ARE USED, IF AT ALL, ONLY AFTER THE ARC BREAK HAS BEEN HEALED BY CORRECTING THE R2 AND R3. If an auditor tries to get in his Mid Ruds or pull missed withholds in the face of an ARC Break in an R2 or R3 session the pc is likely to be driven down to the Sad Effect which is harder to salvage. THE SAD EFFECT We could call this Tearaculi Apathia Magnus and everyone would be in great awe of it. But I see no reason to follow the Latinated nonsense of yesterday's failured sciences. Call it something simple and the auditor will feel he can do something about it and even the pc will cheer up a bit. So it's "the Sad Effect". This is a state of great sadness, apathy, misery and desire for suicide and death. I have been on the trail of the causes of this condition for about 20 years. Like nearly everything else in Scientology this is a new high point in achievement. We have the highest state, OT, and we have the lowest states of being recognized and know the roads to them. RULE NEGLECT OR OVERWHELM AN R2 OR R3 ARC BREAK (PC ANGER OR ANTAGONISM) AND YOU WILL CAUSE THE PC TO DROP INTO THE SAD EFFECT. RULE THE SAD EFFECT IS CAUSED BY NEGLECTING OR OVERWHELMING AN R2 OR R3 ARC BREAK AND THE STATE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL REMEDIED BY CORRECTING THE R2 OR R3. RULE ALL PCS WHO ARE SAD, HOPELESS, ETC HAVE HAD THEIR R2 OR R3 MISHANDLED BY LIFE OR AUDITING. ARC BREAK CAUSE RULE ALL R2 OR R3 ARC BREAKS STEM FROM WRONG ITEMS OR GOALS, INCOMPLETE LISTS, WRONG WAY TO OPPOSE OR NO AUDITING. ALL THESE ARE IN ESSENCE MISSED WITHHOLDS OF THE GREATEST POSSIBLE MAGNITUDE AND THEREFORE CAUSE ARC BREAKS OF THE GREATEST POSSIBLE MAGNITUDE. Bad auditing only serves to key in an existing R2 or R3 Error. In actual fact, a missed withhold can amount to a whole section of the GPM (goal error or leaving the GPM section before it is clean), a wrong goal, a wrong Item, a wrong way to Item or, of lesser degree, not finding an Item. RULE THE COMMON DENOMINATOR OF ALL R2 R3 ARC BREAKS CONSISTS OF A MISSED OR WRONGLY DESIGNATED GPM, GOAL OR RELIABLE ITEM. THERE ARE NO OTHER SOURCES OF R2 OR R3 ARC BREAK. Bad sessioning, poor auditing, ordinary life missed withholds are only contributive to R2 and R3 ARC Breaks and are incapable of doing more than keying in and intensifying the magnitude of the ARC Break which has already been caused by errors in R2 and R3. THE FIFTEEN PRINCIPAL CAUSES The fifteen principal causes of ARC Break in R2 and R3 are: 1. Failure to complete a list; 2. By-passing an Item; 3. Giving the pc a wrong Item; 3a.Opposing an Item wrong way to; 4. Giving the pc an Item with altered wording; 5. Giving the pc no Item; 6. Failure to complete a goals list; 7. By-passing the pc's goal; 8. Giving the pc a wrong goal; 9. Giving the pc a goal with altered wording; 10.Giving the pc no goal; 11.Failure to complete a GPM before going to the next; 12.By-passing a GPM; 13.Getting the pc into the wrong GPM; 14.Going too far into a GPM without finding a goal; 15.No auditing. The fifteen apply to both R2 and R3, all of them. They can be made up into an assessment list (shortly to be issued), which list, assessed by elimination, will give you the exact cause of the ARC Break (which I think is pretty clever of me) and permit you to heal it rapidly. While you will feel on occasion that the assessment result is no more easily interpreted then fortune telling, you will find that it is always right. It spots the missed R2-R3 missed withhold. If it comes up "By-Passed Item" you'll have a scramble trying to find it, but you at least know why the pc ARC Broke and the pc will permit you to look (even while screaming at you). THE CYCLE OF THE ARC BREAK STAGE ONE: The ARC Break starts always in the same way. The pc finds something wrong with the auditor, the subject, or tools of auditing or the auditing room. He does this in varying intensity, ARC Break to ARC Break. STAGE TWO: This is followed by misemotion, also directed at the auditor, subject, tools or room. STAGE THREE: If the auditor continues on with auditing the pc will drop into grief, sadness or apathy. This is an inevitable cycle and may be followed by the pc with greater or lesser intensity of emotion, or loudness or lack of response. A skilled auditor will recognize and stop it at Stage One above. It is sometimes not possible to stop the cycle because it enters the stages and completes them too swiftly, but it must be cared for, and no further R2 or R3 may be done until the R2 or R3 is corrected. THE AUDITOR'S VIEW The auditor must realize that the ARC Break is caused by an error which has just occurred - within seconds or minutes, and must not go back a half a dozen sessions unless the pc has been pretty upset all along. Something has just happened, usually, that is wrong R2 or R3. The auditor must stop all forward action and must not do anything except correct what has already happened. Do not continue on, do not get in Mid Ruds, do not pull missed withholds or do anything else but correct the R2 and R3. Do not do new lists or new approaches or new actions until the old action is straightened up. To continue is to produce the Sad Effect. If the pc is already in the Sad Effect at session start, treat it as an ARC Break with the Drill given. The pc does not realize that anything has been missed. He or she thinks it's the auditor, the subject or the tools and will target only these. The fact of the ARC Break must be noted and the substance of the criticism must be ignored by the auditor. If the pc knew what had been missed there would be no ARC Break. The missed withhold of the Item or whatever is not only missed by the auditor but by the pc. The pc won't ever spot it, left on his own. It's up to the auditor. The auditor only must make up his or her mind as to what's wrong. The directions of the pc (even a skilled Scientologist as a pc) are nearly always wrong. The auditor is there to listen and compute. As it's the pc's bank, the pc can't compute on his or her own case. Taking the pc's directions will always involve and prolong the ARC Break. What really caused it will be occluded to the pc. Don't always do something different than what the pc says. By averages the pc might have accidentally hit on it. Just do what is necessary to straighten out the R2 and R3. Just don't depend on the pc to tell you. Know your R2 and R3. You, the auditor, are the only one present who can think clearly. That's what you're for. THE D OF P'S VIEW The D of P has a different view of an ARC Break. It is by sessions according to auditors' reports. To get a case going again that has gone into Stage Three, examine yesterday's reports. Look for a change in pc's goals and gains and correct the session before the one in which they changed. When, an auditing supervisor becomes an auditor he or she carries this habit forward into auditing and presented with an ARC Breaking pc in session, tends to look to yesterday. But in a session, the ARC Breaking action usually occurs only seconds or minutes before the ARC Break. Look there when auditing. THE DRILL This drill is to be used in all Practical Sections before the student is turned loose on R2 or R3. Designation: R2 and R3 Drill One. Purpose: To prevent errors in R2 and R3 and to prevent upsets in the pc's case. Theory: The effort of a pc at the start of an ARC Break is to stop the auditor. The pc's effort is aimed at the auditor's skill, person, the subject, auditing tools or the room. The comments are critical, whether jocular or misemotional. When this effort fails to stop the auditor, and the auditor presses on with auditing, the pc is overwhelmed and goes rapidly down tone scale. In a severe R2 or R3 ARC Break the pc will stay down scale for minutes, hours, days, weeks or months until the ARC Break is repaired by correcting the R2 or R3 error made immediately before the ARC Break. The correct action is to prevent all possibility of the auditor becoming too enturbulated to think, prevent all engagement in refutation of the pc's accusations, give the auditor time and calm to correct the R2 or R3, test the correction by seeing if it stops the ARC Break, and only then re-commence the session. The key is that even the most startled auditor, seeing an ARC Break begin, can associate it with the word "Break". The drill is always used in actual sessions even when the auditor thinks he knows the reason for it. DRILL: Auditor: List the Items in this room. Coach: Privately makes up his mind which of the ARC Break points is wrong. Does auditing command briefly and then unexpectedly criticizes (with greater or lesser violence) auditor, room, tools, subject or self or drops into simulated tears or apathy. Auditor: Thank you. We will now take a short break. (Gathers papers and leaves room. Shuffles papers and returns into room.) Auditor: I would like to do a short assessment on you. (Auditor does actual E-Meter assessment from a standard HCO Bulletin question list which will be provided from time to time, based on the Principal Causes of R2-R3 ARC Breaks. Finds the one the coach was hiding by actual meter reaction.) Auditor: I find we have (gives cause found) and we will now locate it. is that all right with you? Coach: Okay. Auditor: The session is resumed. Coach: That's it. In actual practice the auditor would have examined the papers of the pc to come to some conclusion about the case in private and seen what was wrong or seen the D of P or somebody else for help. And then would have confirmed it by assessment. History: Developed at Saint Hill by L. Ron Hubbard in March AD 13, to prevent severe upsets in R2 and R3. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:gl.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 041 HCOPL 15 MAR 63 CHECKSHEET RATING SYSTEM (OEC V4 p 164) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 MARCH AD13 Sthil Students Info Central Orgs Academies CHECK SHEET RATING SYSTEM A system of rating of material will hereafter be employed in all Theory and Practical Examinations in all Scientology training activities. Bulletins, tapes and Drills will be assigned each one a rating as follows: 1. STAR RATING. Passing Grade 100% on extensive verbal examination and/or inspection. 2. 75 RATING. Passing Grade 75% on simple written examination of which True and False questions can comprise 75% or more of the questions asked. 3. ZERO RATING. Passed by proof of having read or listened to the material (such as notes or a general verbal statement of the subject which assures the Theory Examiner that the material has been covered). STAR RATING MATERIAL THEORY: Bulletins and tapes of material vitally necessary in making the currently used processes work, Auditor's Code, Axioms, etc. PRACTICAL: TR0, 1, 2, 3, 4, Anti Q and A, Meter Reading, Session Script, etc. 75 RATING MATERIAL THEORY: Basic Theory Bulletins and Tapes. PRACTICAL: None. ZERO RATING MATERIAL THEORY: Texts of Scientology, background material, older processes not now in use, etc. PRACTICAL: All remaining drills (passed by student on the evidence of another student). It is hoped that this system will speed training and ease its burden on students and instructors. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 042 HCOB 17 MAR 63 R2-R3 CORRECTIONS TO 13 MAR 63 (NTV VII p. 68-9, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH AD 13 Central Orgs Missions URGENT R2-R3 CORRECTIONS TYPOGRAPHICALS AND ADDED NOTES HCOB 13 Mar. 63 II, THE END OF A GPM In the line plot, correct just below "The Most Screamish," "Goal Small R/S." to "Goal Small RR." Correct below "Loud Voices" "Goal Large R/S" to "Goal Large RR." A goal always rocket reads in the early part of a line plot. It does not R/S until somewhere around "Whatever might make a sound." Before starting into the GPM a goal must RR. Do not take an R/Sing goal as the goal. On prepchecking it, a goal that originally is found by R/S will begin RR. In some cases the GPM item first contacted from a goal oppose list may not RR but R/S. Delete the arrow from "The Goal to Scream" to "Happy People." Extend arrow from "To Scream" to "Happy People." Also the goal oppose list may have given "The Most Screamish" instead of "A Mute." This is quite ordinary. If so, then the horizontal arrows throughout the plot would be pointing to the right in each case and the arrow from the "Goal Oppose List" would point to "The Most Screamish" instead of "A Mute." And the diagonal arrows would go from the terms down to the left to the next oppterm. Which way these arrows face is of small importance so long as the line plot shows which RI came, on listing, from which RI. If you did not get an RI from an RI you listed or got one wrong way to, put all items found on the line plot anyway. The span of a GPM mentioned in the 4th paragraph page 1 of HCOB 13 Mar. 63 II, THE END OF A GPM, is only approximate and has no actual technical value. Page 3, 3rd paragraph from bottom: change figure 12 to "about 20." HCOB 15 Feb. 63, LISTING RULES. Last paragraph, first line (following numeral 8) last word: Change to "rocket reading" not "rock slamming" as given. R3 deals in rocket reads. Add to HCOB 15 Feb. 63, LISTING RULES: General Note A pc who is reading small on a meter should be listed at higher sensitivity than 4. The sensitivity rule is: IN LISTING, SET THE SENSITIVITY LOW ENOUGH TO MAKE CONSTANT METER ADJUSTMENT UNNECESSARY AND HIGH ENOUGH TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE PC'S READS. Some auditors strew their reports with question marks instead of R/Ses and RRs after items because they have their sensitivity too low. Mask your listing paper from the pc with any barrier. If a pc sees what R/Ses or RRs he or she may start to represent it and wreck the list. Seat the pc back far enough from the auditing table so you can see the cans in his or her lap and tell whether or not the pc is fidgeting with them. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 043 HCOB 18 MAR 63 R2-R3, IMPORTANT DATA, DON'T FORCE THE PC (TV5 p. 255-9, NTV VII p. 70-75) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1963 Central Orgs Franchise R2-R3 IMPORTANT DATA DON'T FORCE THE PC Never force a pc to list when doing R2-12 or 3-M, especially 3-M. If the pc has difficulty listing, three things may be wrong: 1. The Item being listed is wrong way to; 2. It may be a Wrong Item (even from another GPM); 3. It may be an Item from some other GPM. A pc actually can't help but list easily if it's the right Item that the list is coming from. In the usual case, listing from a right Item requires only the most occasional giving of the auditing question by the auditor. Once at the start of the list, once after each interruption to check something. Between, the pc just gives Items in a steady flow. Occasionally the pc asks for the question. If the auditor has to give a question for each item he gets, Man there's one of the above 3 wrong. WRONG WAY TO Mass moves in on a wrong way to list question. It's being given, "Who or what would loud voices oppose" and it should be "Who or what would oppose loud voices". If it's wrong: (1) the mass moves in; (2) the pc starts to discolor; (3) the pc has to continuously repeat the question to himself; (4) the pc can't wrap his mind around the question; (5) the pc discolors or darkens; (6) the tone arm goes unreasonably high (above 5 in some cases); (7) the pc may ARC Break. If in the presence of such symptoms the auditor forces the pc to go on listing, real trouble can then develop, as the mass caves in on the body. BODY VS THETAN To understand this trouble we have to review what we have known for years about bodies and thetans. The thetan is not the body. The bank belongs to the thetan, not to the body. You are running a thetan and his bank while helped and hindered by the body. The body helps the auditor because it provides a communication relay to a thetan who cannot yet speak, hear or act without a body. The E-Meter cans are held by the body's hands, the body's voice box magnifies the thetan's speech and body lips, larynx, etc, add diction. The ears magnify the auditor's voice. The body relays various senses and somatics to the thetan. The body discolors when mass from the bank is brought in on it. Further, because he is in a body you can tell if the pc is sitting in the pc's chair (joke). The body hinders the auditor by being fragile. Life, long before auditing, has been keying the thetan's masses in on this body. In auditing, masses are released off the body and out of the thetan's bank. The body, accustomed after all to masses keying in on it in life, can still survive a lot of bad auditing. But why? As you go earlier and earlier in the bank the "power" of the thetan's mock-ups increases. Earlier on the track the thetan was more powerful and made more formidable mock-ups. Thus the earlier the GPM you are addressing (certainly beyond the 3rd), the more care you have to use not to pull masses in on the body, which is to say the more accurate you have to be. Now, as the thetan, by clearing GPMs, becomes more and more able to handle and recognize goals and Items, the auditor tends to more and more abandon the safety points of R3-M. These are, testing the goal, making the oppterm-terminal test for each RI, watching the tendency of the needle to tighten, watching for pc's darkening. Abandoning these, the auditor tends to race on, finding more GPMs, goals and RIs, cleaning up nothing behind him. This is wrong. Test the goal after every RI you find; test every RI you find for terminal or oppterm; really stay alert for the tightening needle and high TA that shows an error; watch carefully for pc darkening. The more advanced the GPM, the more careful you have to be of the body. Don't go plunging on after an ARC Break. Find why by the ARC Break assessment and straighten it up. When you complete a GPM, go about 2 Items deep into the next one, find its goal and then go back and put in the BMRs on every Item in the former line plot and give the gone goal an 18 button prepcheck. Only then, proceed on into the next GPM whose goal has been found. Items get easier to find as you advance into new GPMs, lists get shorter, but the RIs are harder and harder on the body when done wrong. So be sure and then proceed. And if the pc won't list for any reason (even his own balkiness) find out what's wrong before the current action and be sure that was it before proceeding. It's easier to lose session time in looking for former errors than in trying to revive a pc or heal a screaming ARC Break. Even the most accurate auditing gives the pc heavy somatics. That's ok. Just don't force the pc beyond where he can easily go. The real howling ARC Breaks only come after you have forced the pc onward after something has gone wrong. If you have howling ARC Breaks with a pc you have forced the pc into a channel where the pc cannot easily go. WRONG ITEM Listing a completely wrong Item (which did not fire or which did) can happen in a number of ways: If you list an RI wrong way to you will get a high TA and fewer RRs on the list. Further, you may just run out of RRs on the next list or one or two lists down. And, a real catastrophe, you can find, on a wrong way oppose, an Item out of an adjacent GPM for which you have no found goal. The Item you find won't fit the goal of the GPM you are supposed to be running. Best thing to do is abandon it (but put on the plot) and go back and find which RI behind you was wrong way oppose (it will tick or fire), put in the BMRs on it and list it the other way to. On later GPMs the pc will easily overlist and list beyond the one you are trying for and get the next in line. The way to tell is test the listing question for clean every five Items the pc gives. The moment it's clean, stop listing. For instance, in the 4th GPM, you are listing "Somebody Who Can't Whisper" (Line plot HCO Bulletin of March 13) and you overlist. You will get "Loud Voices" on the list but you will find "A Whisperer" as the last RRing Item which will read. Then, if you omit the term-oppterm test and assume "A Whisperer" is an oppterm, you will do a wrong way oppose and may get into another GPM entirely. However, especially after BMR on it, "A Whisperer", wrong way opposed, will now fire again with an RR. But the pc still ARC Breaks. Why? You overshot on the "Somebody Who Can't Whisper" oppose list and you have a by-passed RI, "Loud Voices". BMR the RRs earlier on the "Somebody Who Can't Whisper" oppose list and you'll find "Loud Voices" probably fires now. Or do it by pc's recognition (but the Item recognized has to fire with an RR). Or when you do "A Whisperer" right way oppose, you'll also get "Loud Voices". Auditing on 3-M is like threading through a mine field with the pc ready to explode if you stray. Experience will let you relax. TRAVELING RR In Listing the RR travels down the list. It comes from the goal charge. Therefore it can travel. You can sometimes bring it back up a list with enough BMR to an earlier RR seen on listing. The most weird thing in 3-M is the Goal as an RI behavior (on Mar 13 HCO Bulletin, "To Scream" as an RI, bottom of plot, page 2). As you list it, as an RI in its proper sequence on the plot, not as a goal oppose, it behaves as an RI oppose list, not as a source list. On it the pc will put, usually, the goal of the next GPM. On it will usually be found, as the last RR Item on the list, "Happy People". But the goal of the next GPM on that list will not RR when said to pc! Not until you take all the goals off the RI oppose list and nul them as a goals list. Then the goal of the next GPM will fire and prove out. In short, only the last RR seen on nulling on an RI oppose list, will fire with an RR. This does not mean the remaining Items seen to RR while listing are not RIs in their own right. It only means that on any list, the RR travels to the last RRing Item seen on listing when the list is complete. Items which RRed on listing will not fire as part of the list but, taken off the list and known by the pc to be off the list and called as themselves will RR. When you get a pc into the 5th GPM this becomes very invariable and gets vastly in your road, as you can by-pass the next RI you should get and find the one after that, or you can lose the next GPM's goal as it doesn't RR on the RI oppose list from the last goal while still on that list. It's okay if you know it can happen. It will help you cure an ailing line plot or goals list in a hurry. RRs travel on 3-M lists down to the last RR. And if it has travelled, the earlier RRs (Items or Goals on an RI List) seen on listing will not RR until they have been taken off that list and are called in their own right. WRONG WORDING Always be sure you have the right wording for an Item or a goal. A slightly wrong wording for a goal will cause it to RS and fizzle out. Get the pc to change the wording on it and it may RR on and on. If a pc ARC Breaks on a goals list, you had and passed the goal or you had the goal with a slightly wrong wording. The pc still ARC Breaks on a wrong wording as it's a missed withhold. Pcs usually put down varied wordings on goals lists. Encourage it, even though it's representing an RRing Item. If a goal fires, RSes, fizzles, vanishes, get other wordings for it. And it may RR beautifully. Example: To Succeed. On checking, RRed six times, blew TA down, RSed madly. RSed, dwindled and then ticked. Auditor went on. Pc ARC broke. Auditor went back over list, got wording for To Succeed as "To be successful". Goal RRed beautifully. No ARC Break. Onward bound into next GPM. Items with the article "A" or "The" omitted or added, or plural for singular, will not fire well or at all. Example: Item listed "A Sensation". Checked out as "Sensation". No fire. Pc recalls it should be "A Sensation". Item fires and is an RI. Accuracy of listing exactly what the pc said is important. He usually said it right the first time. Say it back and check it out the same way. Sometimes a pc wants to change a word in an item being called. Always let him but check both versions, the one listed and the one changed. The one listed is usually right if recorded right by the auditor. ITEM FROM ANOTHER GPM A STRAY RI is an RI from a GPM of another goal than the one being worked. You can get a goal or Item from another GPM by backwards oppose or overlisting. In finding the goal of another GPM than the one you want to enter, this is easy. It fires very badly, ticks and fools around. An RI from another GPM on the other hand fires well. When you do the "How does the goal relate to _______" step and the pc can't relate it, or mass appears when he tries, watch it. You probably have a backwards oppose behind you or have by-passed an RI by overlisting or underlisting, or, more probably, both. What to do? Put the stray RI on the plot marked as a "Stray" and locate the wrong way oppose or by-pass on your Line Plot and correct. It will do no harm to 4 way package the STRAY RI. But it probably won't do any good either. Two GPMs later you suddenly find it as a new RI. The pc will probably ARC Break at this time. But the reason for the ARC Break lies in an earlier wrong way oppose or a by-passed RI or RIs. Use the STRAY RI as a signal that a wrong way oppose exists behind you or an RI has been by-passed. The proper order of actions, if the above happens, is to 1. Locate the By-Passed Item; 2. Use it to continue your RI oppose (spiral staircase); 3. Ignore the wrong way oppose Item (don't instantly right way oppose it) and any stray RI, letting them come up in their proper sequence, no matter how much later that is. MINIMIZE GOAL OPPOSE LISTS Only do a goal oppose list at the start of the first GPM and that's it. You don't need any more if you go right. You'll go into GPMs in proper sequence on the spiral staircase with no further goal oppose lists for any goal. You will find, however, that the goal as an RI (see "To Scream" as an RI, page 2, HCO Bulletin March 13, 1963) operates as an RI oppose list and will be done in its proper time and place. This is not a source list and behaves as an RI oppose list. Take the goals off it to another list and nul them for the next GPM. Only one Goal Oppose List is needed for a case. After that, always use the last RI that still fires with an RR as your source for RI oppose lists. CLEAR TEST You don't need to do a Clear Test. It might mess up the bank. A natural free needle without prepcheck begins to appear around the fifth GPM. Check out a first goal clear by his or her Line Plot. If it compares in all respects to that of HCO Bulletin March 13, and the goal is clean saying it to the pc, call it a first goal clear. A bracelet clear would be, actually, a theta clear, and would emerge after the 5th to 8th GPM had been cleaned up. By present calculation a free needle, totally stable theta clear emerges after the 8th GPM has been run. No calculation on Operating Thetan exists at this moment, but at a guess, it's well beyond the 8th GPM. Up to the 6th GPM a clear test is liable to foul up the case a little. So save it for later and really send up rockets in celebration. Thetans have done a lot of living. Routine 3-M is complex and, unless the auditor is well trained, has pitfalls. But we have years to learn it. Clearing is the real thing. It's worth it. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 044 HCOPL 23 MAR 63 CLASSIFICATION OF AUDITORS, CLASS II AND GOALS (OEC Vol 4 p. 340, NTV VII p. 76-77) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MARCH 1963 Issue III CenOCon Missions CLASSIFICATION OF AUDITORS CLASS II AND GOALS (Modifies all HCO Policy Letters on classes of auditors) Goals finding is declared herewith to be a Class II activity. Using Class II goal-finding skills as released, any Class II Auditor may employ them to find goals. Running the goal found on Routine 3 processes is not authorized for Class II Auditors This authorization is based on the following technical discoveries: 1. It is highly beneficial to a case to have goals-finding processes run on it, regardless of whether a goal is found or not; 2. The only danger in finding a wrong goal lies in running it; 3. The public at large can understand and respond to the finding of a basic purpose; 4. I have made a breakthrough in expediting the finding of goals. 5. The longest period in clearing is now goal finding. Any goal found may be prepchecked by a Class II Auditor using standard Prepchecking. No goal found may be run on Routine 3 processes by a Class II Auditor. Any goal found must be checked out by a Class IV Auditor. A correct goal may be run on Routine 3 processes by a Class III Auditor under the supervision of a Class IV Auditor. CLASS II AWARD Class II may be awarded by reason of attendance and satisfactory completion of an Academy course specifically designated for Class II, or satisfactory work in an HGC. CLASS III AWARD A Class III may be awarded to auditors satisfactorily completing an advanced Academy course and satisfactory work under staff contract in an HGC. SAINT HILL AWARDS Class III and IV awards are given to Saint Hill graduates who satisfactorily complete their training for these classes. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 045 HCOB 23 MAR 63 CLEAR AND OT (TV5 p. 260-1, NTV VII p. 78-9) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MARCH AD13 Franchise CLEAR & OT DON'T TRY TO MAKE AN OT BEFORE YOU MAKE A CLEAR. One of the enduring observations which has arisen in clearing and which will always remain true is summed up in this line: DON'T TRY TO MAKE AN OT BEFORE YOU MAKE A CLEAR. Stressing this conclusion is vitally important and will always be important. Why? In their understandable enthusiasm to do "the most for the pc" and obtain the "highest gain" auditors tend to get as many RIs and goals as possible. The "face" acquired in making a "third goal clear" also operates. On the part of the pc there is always some pc pressure to "get on with it", find more RIs, find more goals. There is also "face". "I'm a 3rd goal clear." The auditor, in his own enthusiasm for more GPMs, heeds the pc's protest against case repair and prepchecks and commits the following crime: WITHOUT MAKING A FIRST GOAL, ATTEMPTS TO MAKE AN OT. He does this in gradients. Without making an actual first goal clear, the auditor, with the pc's full insistence, makes a "Third Goal Clear". This law takes over in the face of such "press on" tactics: RULE: YOU CANNOT HAVE AN ANY GOAL CLEAR WITHOUT CLEARING THE GOAL AND ALL ITS GPM. To do this it is necessary to observe this rule: RULE: A GOAL IS NOT CLEAR UNTIL ALL ROCKET READING ITEMS IN THAT GOAL HAVE BEEN FOUND, PROPERLY ALIGNED AND DISCHARGED, AND THE GOAL HAS BEEN FULLY PREPCHECKED. The next Goal is available and easily found, RIs in the next GPM are readily found, there seems to be no reason to waste auditing time by cleaning up the last GPM. This is true of any next GPM. However, just going on and on carries its penalties. IF WE PERSIST IN FAILING TO FULLY CLEAR EACH GPM, WE CAN EXPECT A GENERAL BOG DOWN IN ALL OF SCIENTOLOGY. Why? Because we will all become subject to the very real penalties of failing to clear GPMs before going on. It is alright to find 2 RIs into the next GPM and to find its goal. That is as it should be. But it is not alright not to go back and fully polish up the GPM just left. This is true for all GPMs. You haven't got a first goal clear if you haven't cleared the first GPM and Goal. So don't announce first goal clears if you haven't cleared fully the first goal. Having the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc, goals and some RIs in each still doesn't make a first goal clear. The following liabilities occur when the GPM just left is not fully cleaned up: 1. The pc drags mass from the last GPM into the next GPM; 2. Accuracy of RI finding in the next GPM is diminished; 3. The pc, being more subject to errors in auditing, is far more likely to heavily ARC Break; 4. Body mass (weight) does not diminish; 5. Pc's reality on the next GPM RIs is diminished; 6. A feeling of lassitude (a shadow of the Sad Effect) comes over the pc and he or she does his own work in life with less enthusiasm; 7. The pc's health and actions are better but one does not see what one expects from clearing. Therefore clearing is downgraded by the auditor and pc and others; 8. The actual soaring gains of clearing are not observed, since the GPM and its goal are not actually cleared but only de-intensified. Clear tests, which will be issued from time to time, should be scrupulously passed before going on to the actual running of the next bank. If these simple precautions are observed, clearing is formidable to behold. If they are not observed, then clearing won't be observed - because it hasn't been done. Don't try to make an Operating Thetan before you make a clear. The results will be far, far below that of just first goal clear. A lot of time and agony went into discovering these things. I hope you will benefit by them. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 046 HCOB 29 MAR 63 SUMMARY OF SEC CHECKING (BTB?) (BY REG SHARP) (Not in either set of tech vols. Probably considered to be a BTB as it is by Reg Sharpe. In the late 70's this still appeared on course checksheets as an HCOB even though it was not in the tech volumes. This copy is from a class II pack.) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 29 MARCH 1963 Central Orgs Franchise SUMMARY OF SECURITY CHECKING (As Security Checking is the one form of auditing that does not interfere with R2 or R3, I asked Reg Sharpe to do a run-down on what we know about it. RON HUBBARD.) ____________ Security Checking has an important part to play in modern auditing. We have the datum that as a PC comes up in responsibility so does his recognition of overts. This factor can seriously hamper a PC's progress. Security Checking is a case cleaning activity and it should be thoroughly and competently applied. It is not something to be done just for form's sake. It is done to speed up the advance of the case. A PC who has overts ready to be pulled just cannot make the rapid progress which modern clearing techniques make possible. So don't underestimate the value of Sec Checking. Learn to do it. Learn to do it well and when you do it, go in and do an expert and thorough job. Security Checking is a specialized type of auditing, and it takes a lot of skill and at times some courage to do it well. Auditors must not be kind nor yet unkind. This does not mean that you steer a luke warm middle course between kindness and unkindness. Neither of these two impostors have anything to do with it. You Just go in and audit, you go in to find—and that means dig for OVERTS. If you go in with PC's needle clean and your questioning can get that needle to react, then you are winning. The success of an auditor can be measured by the extent to which he can get reactions on the needle and then cleaning those reactions getting more reactions and cleaning those and so on. It's a probing operation like probing for sore places on a body, locating them and then healing them. The skilled auditor, however, gets to the root of the trouble and clears up a whole batch of overts at once. Security Checking is done in Model Session. The beginning rudiments are put in and by the time you start the body of the session, in this case the security check, the PC should have a nice clean needle. The next thing is to tell the PC that you are going to help him to clean up, and really clean up, the questions on the Form that you are using. REMEMBER IT IS THE QUESTION YOU ARE GOING TO CLEAN - NOT THE NEEDLE. You've already got a clean needle and you could probably keep it clean by Bad TR 1, failure to dig, or just sheer bad auditing. No, it's the question you are cleaning, and in the process you are going to get a dirty or reacting needle. So really get it over to your PC that you are going to CLEAN THE QUESTION. The next action is to announce the first question that you are going to clean. The important thing at this stage is to groove in the question. There are a variety of ways to do this, e.g., ask what the question means. What period or time the question covers. What activities would be included. Where the PC has been that might be something to do with the question. If any other people are likely to be involved. In other words you are steering the PC's attention to various parts of his bank and getting him to have a preliminary look. When this has been done, using very good TR l, you give him the question-OFF THE METER. You can forget your anti Q and A drill. You take your PC's answer and bird dog him about it. If he gives you a general answer you ask him for a specific time (or a specific example) DON'T ACCEPT MOTIVATORS. If he gives you a motivator you say "OK, but what did you do there?" and you want something before the motivator. Example:- PC: "I got mad at him because he kicked my foot." Aud: "What had you done before he kicked your foot?" In this case the PC is giving an overt "I got mad at him" but in fact he is cunningly selling the motivator "He kicked me in the foot". So the rule here is "go earlier than the motivator". Similarly you don't accept criticisms, unkind thoughts, explanations. You want what the PC has done and you want the Time Place Form and Event. When you have succeeded in this you don't leave it there. You ask for an earlier time he had done something like it and you keep going earlier. What you are after is the earliest time he stole, hit somebody, got angry with a PC or whatever is his "crime". Get the earliest one and you will find that the others will blow off like thistledown. Keep a sly eye on your meter and you can tell when you are in a hot area. Use it to help you to know where to dig, but don't use it to steer the PC at this stage. This encourages laziness on the part of the PC. YOU want him in there foraging about and digging up his bank in the process. Only when your PC is thoroughly and healthily exhausted do you check the question on the meter. If you have done an excellent job the question will be clean. However if you get a read you steer your PC by saying "There", "There" whenever you see a repetition of the original read. When he finds it you repeat the procedure outline above. YOU don't go back to the meter until you have really got all there is to be got. When you have got a clean needle you put in your mid ruds on the session, and if these are clean and only if they are clean you go on to the next question. If the ruds do bring out something then you go back to the question and start over again. And so you go on cleaning question after question. The success of a Sec Check Session is not judged by the number of questions cleaned but by the amount of looking you succeeded in making your PC do. If you do this properly, that is the whole outline, you will have a well satisfied PC. If he ARC breaks then you have missed something, so pull your missed withholds. A Rising TA is a clue to something missed. If a PC isn't happy—very happy—at the end of a question then you have missed something. PC's will tell you a hundred and one things that are wrong with your auditing, the D of P's instruction, the form of the question, etc., but they all add up to the same thing-something has been missed. Finally do end Ruds and these should run quickly and smoothly. Run a bit of havingness if necessary. Sharpen your pencil for the goals and gains and you'll leave the session happy and satisfied because that's how your PC feels. One word of warning. If you leave a question unflat, mark it on your auditor's report and TELL YOUR PC it isn't flat. Good digging. Issued by: Reg Sharpe SHSBC Course Secretary for L. RON HUBBARD ================== 047 HCOPL 29 MAR 63 CLEAR REQUIREMENT (OEC V4 p 429) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 MARCH 1963 Sthil Students CLEAR REQUIREMENT Regarding getting clear, as a student on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, the following should be noted: There is no obligation on the part of the course to clear a student before termination. While everything will be done to assist clearing the student and while it is my desire to clear the student, this is a favor extended, not a student's right. Some students will not industriously apply themselves in their course periods and cannot therefore be graduated up through units fast enough to get them clear before termination. The better students are matched in so far as possible in auditing teams. This leaves the unwilling student auditor teamed with auditors of less skill. This reduces chances of getting clear on those who do not apply themselves or will not audit well. The Course is not an HGC and those who attend it only in the hope of receiving auditing are therefore disappointed as they will receive only as much auditing as they give and only of the quality they seem to deserve. The rule of "Help to be helped" is adhered to in so far as possible. While almost all students are people we are proud of, some few waste their case by running up overts against the course and causing administrative upsets. There are then three general categories of upset: 1. The student who won't study; 2. The student who won't audit; and 3. The student who causes heavy administrative upsets by spreading rumors, writing untrue tales home, constantly nagging instructors, etc. Among these we do not include students ARC Broken in session, as this is a fairly routine occurrence and passes away. But included are students who claim they are so ARC Broken in session they cannot study or work. We know this doesn't hold true as others can study and work and audit after session ARC Breaks. Therefore, the course instructors reserve the right, when authorized by the Course Supervisor, to suspend or cancel the "clearing requirement" of any student consistently falling into categories (1), (2) or (3) above, regardless of explanations given by the student. This may or may not affect classification. It certainly does affect the amount of time and effort spent by instructors on getting a student clear. "Suspension or cancellation of the clearing requirement" means that the course resigns any further responsibility for getting the student clear and is at liberty to terminate the student at the end of the course period with or without classification. A student who spends three weeks with minimal study effort, a student who consistently fails to follow directions in auditing his pc or who does not produce results, and the student who consistently runs up overts against the course, is liable to suspension or cancellation of the clearing requirement. In short, if a student by studying and auditing won't help us get other students clear, or if a student seeks to damage our course and its efforts to clear others, through graduating students, we cannot honestly endeavor to clear that student. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 048 HCOB 30 MAR 63 ROUTINE 3M SIMPLIFIED (NTV VII p. 80-88, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MARCH 1963 Missions CenOCon URGENT URGENT URGENT AFFECTS EVERY CASE BEING CLEARED ROUTINE 3M SIMPLIFIED (CANCELS EARLIER R3M STEPS) (R3M2 = R3M Issue II) AN INTERIM RAPID SUMMARY OF CLEARING Suspend any 3M you are doing (except goal finding) and proceed with the following steps only. Leave all reliable items and goals already found by the original version of 3M on the line plot. Don't invalidate the pc's goals and items. Patch in any items you already have with what you will find in doing these steps. Doing the following steps will REPAIR and forward or START any 3M case on which one or more goals have been found. In repair, address the first GPM you contacted. l. CHECK OUT GOAL: Make sure it fires once in any three consecutive times read. (Or make sure a Class IV has seen it RR at sometime.) 2. OBTAIN CONDITIONAL TOP OPPTERM: (See line plot HCOB 13 Mar. 63.) DO NOT DO A GOAL-OPPOSE LIST TO START. (Abandon any goal-oppose list you have done.) This is done by listing only this question with this wording: "WHO OR WHAT WOULD BE MOST LIKELY TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL?" (Pc knows what goal it is. Don't name it in the question.) Do a relatively short list. List only until the question above no longer reads on the meter. Check the question for read about every five items. When it no longer ticks (make sure it isn't ticking from Protest or Decided) add five more items. Test read it. If it still doesn't tick, end list. If it does, continue list. Null this list by elimination, starting at the top of the list, calling each item three times and marking in or out, until only 1 or 2 are in. Put in left-hand buttons on remaining items. One should now rocket read. That is your top oppterm RI. This source list is a source list. The reliable item may appear anywhere on it. (Consider all lists of 3M as source lists now. In R2-12 RI oppose lists still exist.) This "most likely" list will probably be less than a hundred items long. It may be only 10 items long. If it's longer, the question is being protested which makes the question read. This gives you the top of the GPM, hitherto hard to get and usually missing in case repairs. (I had to get clever on this one. Everybody was missing the top of GPMs until case was repaired.) (Note: The exact listing rules for this "most likely" list will be published in a subsequent HCOB. Take whatever you get that is an unmistakable top oppterm [see line plot HCOB 13 Mar. 63 II, THE END OF A GPM where it is "The Most Screamish"]. Use it and go on with the following steps. After you find 3 or 4 RIs downwards, go back and see if the RI you found for top oppterm ticks when read to pc on meter. If it does now, don't throw away the RIs you've just gotten. Just extend the "most likely" list and null what you extended. Take the RI you now find for top oppterm and use it as per steps below. You will find you are going up now higher in the GPM. Complete it upwards until you reach the real top of the oppterm column. Then resume with the former last RI lower in the GPM where you left off going down and continue to the bottom of the GPM exactly as in these steps below. The toughest part of the GPM to get is the top end, and as it's the one most dramatized by the pc, it is the most important in his estimation. If you don't get it all at the top, the pc will drag that mass down through the lower GPMs and things will be less real on the lower RIs and harder to find. The only time you will have difficulty is when a "few RI GPM" extends into present time up from the "first GPM" you contact. That means a goal above the "pc's first goal." You can also have trouble when this "most likely" listing system is used if the pc's first GPM is only half lived through and has its top missing [never formed]. This will become apparent as the pc lists and tests will show you have a terminal. You can in such a case cope by using what you find but realizing you have a terminal on the "most likely list." This is rare so don't invite it. The status of a pc's "first GPM" can be established by meter questions, "Do you have a goal closer to present time?" or " above this?" If the pc's first GPM [meaning the first one contacted by the auditor, always, not the earliest one on the track] is "truncated," missing at the top, the remaining GPMs in the bank will still be of standard size and content. Even if you have trouble finding the top of a "truncated" GPM, still don't do a goal-oppose list. If "most likely" doesn't work on a truncated GPM, try a least likely version.) 3. COMPARE AND TEST RI: Note if getting RI blew down TA. Ask pc if this is the item, if it turns on more mass. Ask how it relates to the goal. Check goal for read. Read next question to pc as a terminal, then as an oppterm. Determine which one gives least mass and use that way of oppose. However, if this RI found in step (2) is anything but an oppterm you have bypassed an item or over- or underlisted or it's not pc's goal. Also, the "first GPM" can have been only partially formed and the top oppterm does not easily express the goal, in which case you'll get a terminal. If so, you'll know by test. 4. OBTAIN CONDITIONAL TOP TERMINAL: Using question "Who or what would oppose (top oppterm just found)?" list. Check the question about every five items given. Immediately that it no longer ticks, add five more. Test RI and question again for tick. If it still doesn't tick, null it. If it does, get five more, etc. Null either by calling each item 3 times in sequence until only one is left and put in left hand buttons on it (Suppress, Careful of, Failed to Reveal), or by calling only the RRs seen on listing each one one time and put in left-hand buttons on it. As all lists in R3M are now all to be considered source lists, the former method is safer but harder on the pc. These are very short lists. All RI oppose lists are. They may be as small as 10 items, certainly seldom more than 20. Length is determined by the needle tick of the question (read to pc) vanishing. If you overlist you will miss an RI, err with a bypassed item, do the next one wrong way oppose and send the pc into another GPM! The whole error in listing is bypassing items by over- or underlisting. That the listing question ticks means the reliable item is not yet on the list or there are more items needed to discharge the tick. That the listing question ceases to tick means the reliable item is either on the list or will be in the next three or four given by the pc. 5. COMPARE AND TEST RI: Ask the pc if item turned on more mass. Ask pc if it's the item. Ask pc if RI found opposes the one it was listed from. Ask pc how it relates to goal. Test RI for term or oppterm by asking next listing question one way and then the other. " Who or what would oppose ? " " Who or what would ____oppose?" The one that turns on the least mass is it. This is, however, a terminal and if it isn't, the list you did to find it was a little too long or a little too short. Find an earlier RI on it or extend it for another RI. 6. OBTAIN NEXT OPPTERM: List "Who or what would (RI just found) oppose?" Null list by elimination or by RRs as above. Find RI. Always read the RI you are listing from and then the question you are listing on. Doing this jogs the question to read again when it might not. If the read won't go off the RI you are listing from, it is surely arrived at after an RI has been bypassed. Redo the list it came off from. 7. COMPARE AND TEST RI: Ask pc if RI turned on more mass. Ask pc if it's pc's item. Ask pc if RI is opposed by terminal it was listed from. Ask pc how RI relates to goal. Test goal. Test RI for term or oppterm. 8. OBTAIN NEXT TERMINAL: List "Who or what would oppose_____(RI just found)?" Complete by testing question for reads. Null by elimination or by RRs seen on listing. Obtain RI. Test RI you're listing from for a tick. 9. COMPARE AND TEST RI: Ask pc if RI turned on more mass. Ask pc if it's pc's item. Ask pc if RI opposes the one it was listed from. Ask pc how it relates to the goal. Read goal. Test RI for term or oppterm. It should be a terminal. 10. CONTINUE STEPS 6, 7, 8, 9 ABOVE IN SEQUENCE. 11. Toward bottom of the GPM, 20 or 30 (number is a guess) RIs from top, you will find (and this is not a guess) a terminal "Somebody or something with the goal (pc's goal)" or "Somebody with the goal (pc's goal)." There will be an oppterm, then "The goal (pc's goal)." Then an oppterm. Then just the pc's goal "To whatever." This last RI is called "the goal as an RI." There we stop all actions as above. The pc can know that these pat bottom GPM RIs exist. He can even be shown a model line plot. In a misguided enthusiasm the pc can put all of them on the list at once. Only the right one in sequence will RR, and if he's been premature in putting them down they won't fire, so don't worry about it. Just be sure you get those RIs. (See HCOB 13 Mar. 63 for the pattern.) 12. LIST FINAL LIST: When you definitely arrive honestly at "the goal as an RI" ("To Scream," "To Whatever,") just the goal all by itself, you will find that although the goal has ceased to RR, this "goal as an RI" still has an RR on it. Now, the list we do from this is the final list of that GPM. And it works like the old goal oppose list. And it is the only place we now do a goal oppose list. It's a long list. The only long list we now do. The list wording is exactly and only this "Who or what would (pc's goal) oppose?" (Who or what would To Scream oppose?) We ignore any complaints from the pc that he or she can't answer the question. Even hint there are some goals it might oppose as well as items. This is listed to fifty beyond the last RR or R/S on the list and until the question no longer ticks. THIS LIST WILL HAVE ON IT THE NEXT GOAL WHEN COMPLETE. (And so, I found a way to give you the next goal without any fumbling.) It may be very long. It must have goals on it as well as items. Don't do it until the line plot is complete. Or you'll get an item off it, not a goal. 13. NULL THE FINAL LIST: Null by elimination. The RRs seen on listing will have no real bearing on the final RI, so don't just read off the RRs. Chances are the final item (the goal) won't RR while listing and won't RR until the list is completely nulled. Find item. It should be a goal. The goal of the next GPM. 14. SMOOTH OUT LAST GPM: As soon as the goal of the next GPM is found, make sure it fires nicely but don't get pc involved in it. Don't start to find RIs in it yet. Or you'll have to go on with next GPM and be trying to make an OT before you make a Clear! 15. INSPECT OLD LINE PLOT: Each GPM should have its own line plot. Make sure pc's line plot is complete, particularly at the top. 16. INSPECT RIs: Read over each RI on old line plot to see if one ticks. INCLUDE THOSE ON THE PLOT THAT OBVIOUSLY BELONG TO SOME OTHER GPM. If one is found ticking, take the list off which it came (not the list listed from it) and renull it or extend it somewhat and renull. A new heretofore missing RI will turn up. Oppose it gently (short list) and in short, do steps 6, 7, 8, 9 on it (depending for sequence on whether it's a terminal or an oppterm) until the RR vanishes. Be careful not to leap into a new GPM by overlisting or opposing backwards. (Wrong-way oppose lands you in a different GPM usually.) If during inspection you find a firing RI on the line plot rocket reading even though it was opposed, the rule in the above paragraph still applies. It was backwards oppose. BUT, the fault is that an RI was bypassed on an earlier list. Find the bypass and oppose it. In this patch up (or patching up a GPM done by earlier versions) you will find a list, even though RRs were seen on listing, suddenly fail to give up an RI. That's usually because the RI is already found. The list has been tied back into the already existing RIs. PUT EVERYTHING YOU FIND RIGHTLY OR WRONGLY ON THE LINE PLOT. THEY'RE ALL THE PC's ITEMS. When the line plot is all smooth and looks like the 13 Mar. 63 HCOB model, go to next step. However, if the auditor has already found and listed other goals and the pc has 3 or 4 incomplete GPMs, the line plots will have become interdependent and straightening them up depends on running the last goal found as per this HCOB (finding the next goal but no RIs into its GPM) and then going back for a smooth-out of the others. No danger, only discomfort and more frequent ARC breaks attend the condition where the auditor tried to make an OT before making a Clear. Just do the goal with the biggest read, complete its plot, but don't find RIs in a new goal found from it, and work around as you can in the old mess until each GPM is complete. 17. PREPCHECK OLD GOAL: Only when you've done all these steps on a GPM do an 18 button Prepcheck on the old goal (no counter-button as it may be the next goal!). Get in the BMRs on listing and on auditing on GPMs. 18. DO NEXT GPM: Exactly in accordance with the above steps 1 to 17 inclusive, do the next GPM. NOTES Pcs attach far more importance to GPM mess-ups and goal mess-ups than they deserve. Just handle ARC breaks with HCOB 14 Mar. 63, ARC BREAKS, HANDLING OF, and assessments for the cause of them and correct accordingly-the ARC break assessment is always right. Bypassed items, even bypassed goals and GPMs won't kill the pc. I know. I've been in every cross-fire that goals and GPMs could produce as a pc and I'm still alive even if occasionally frayed. So stop worrying and do a good job and do what you consider correct, not what the pc insists upon, and you'll win through with your pc. I admit it takes a high level of courage to audit Routine 3M. But it's the only safe road out from aberration. _____________ In nulling a single list: That an item appears earlier on a list is no guarantee it doesn't appear later in the bank than the one you want. _____________ Don't fail to let a pc have his RIs and goals. That they aren't the RIs or goals of the GPM you have to work doesn't make them not his. Develop the H Factor: "It's yours but it's not due quite yet." "This is undoubtedly your goal (on one that stayed in but isn't it) but we have to find the GPM closer to where we're working." "That's your RI all right. But we need the consecutive one to the last we found." _____________ In case repair, use the above rundown. To repair R3M2 (when you run out of RIs suddenly) the rule is to find the item on the line plot that reacts on the meter, renull or extend the list it came from and locate the bypassed item and proceed with that as though you hadn't found anything else. _____________ If you encounter an RI that, given to the pc, turns on more mass, extend or renull the list it came from and get another RI that doesn't. But don't be too harsh with this rule. Some RIs do turn on a bit more mass, particularly when the top of a GPM has not been found. _____________ If you find an RI that doesn't belong in this GPM, put it on the line plot. Realize it came from a wrong-way oppose. See if the list the RI you just opposed came from doesn't have a bypassed item on it. If so, don't bother to right-way oppose the RI you wrong-way opposed. Use the earlier RI and go on. The reason you can't find an RI on a list even though you saw RRs on listing is because the RI for that list has already been found, or your list is just a trifle short. If you suddenly find no RRs seen on listing a list, an earlier item was wrong, bypassed or wrong-way opposed. Locate and go on. _____________ If RR on items is getting smaller, beware of having a wrong goal, or having gone into a GPM you have no goal for. Don't find more RIs until you find what's wrong. Only finding RIs for which you have no goal will shut off the RR and R/S. Finding the goal for them will turn the RR and R/S back on. _____________ If you have to put a question mark after the list RRs and R/Ses, you are nulling with too low a sensitivity setting. Put up the sensitivity until you can see what's happening. Or get one of the new listing meters. _____________ If a pc cognites on an item as you list and it RRs (it must RR to be an RI), say "Very good." Test the question for a read. If the question is clean, read the item to the pc to make sure it RRs. If the question still reads say, "I'm sure you're right. However, give me a few more so I can get the tick off this question." Do so, test the question and read the pc the RI. If it doesn't read, put left-hand buttons in on it. If it still doesn't read, find the one that does. Pc won't ARC break unless you give him an item that doesn't RR. _____________ There are no bonus packages in R3M. If two items RR or R/S on the list, the list is incomplete. Complete it until question doesn't tick. _____________ We will no longer consider there are two kinds of lists. Due to the traveling nature of the RR on the list, the last RR always reads, but it may be after the RI we need. To avoid bypassed items consider every list a source list, the RI can appear anywhere on it. Considering them all source lists ensures your finding the RI that should RR and in sequence. _____________ The main danger in R3M is not wrong-way oppose. You can tell that fairly easily. The danger lies in bypassing RIs. The way these get bypassed is to overlist or underlist. _____________ If the RR seen on consecutive RIs found is getting smaller as you find more, you have the wrong goal for the GPM you're in. Either get into the right GPM or, less preferably, find the goal of the one you're working. You can only get into the wrong GPM by having a wrong goal in the first place or by bypassing RIs, resulting in opposing an RI wrong way to and getting thrown into another GPM, or by moving down into the next GPM after the old goal has ceased to tick. _____________ A goal RR improves as you find successive RIs, right up to the moment it begins to occasionally R /S and RR, as marked on the line plot of HCOB 13 Mar. 63. If a goal doesn't read better on the meter after you find the top oppterm and terminal, there's something wrong with that goal. If the goal was wrong and the RIs you found did RR, use the oppterm to list goals from and the terminal to list goals against. "What might be the goal of (oppterm)?" and "What goal would (terminal) be an overt against?" _____________ Watch overshooting into the GPM below the one you should be working in. You can miss the low RIs ("Somebody with the goal," etc.) and plow on into the GPM below it without its goal. After a dozen or so RIs without having the goal, the pc's ability to R/S and RR will shut off, to be restored only when the goal for them is found. _____________ Tell your pc the best way in the world to commit thetancide is to self-audit or self-list on R3M, or to dope the line plot in advance. If the pc thinks of goals or items out of session, make the pc write them down and bring the list in. But discourage it. _____________ I saw the troubles you were having and have been researching swiftly to remedy it with a more positive version of R3M. It's getting simpler. It can't get much easier. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ==================