From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Jun 04 15:44:56 1999 Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news Date: 4 Jun 1999 22:44:56 -0000 Subject: FZBA 1/14 SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology Message-ID: <36468cdd4cb3429bf49d54c0d374572c@anonymous.poster> Sender: Secret Squirrel Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to . The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable. From: Secret Squirrel Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net Lines: 2211 Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:801049 alt.clearing.technology:83780 FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 1 ************************************************** The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of: 1. The Old Tech Volumes 2. The New Tech Volumes 3. Confidential Material 4. BTBs 5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech 6. Anything else appropriate that we can find They do not include a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those) b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately) Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice as much material as the old tech volumes), and because the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each year as a separate volume. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** CONTENTS: We have assigned item numbers to everything we feel belongs in this volume. We have also numbered items which are missing. For this year, the missing items primarily consist of HCO Information Letters (there are no official volumes which collect these) and a few policies and bulletins (which are probably BTBs) plus only one missing confidential HCOB. These are listed after the main table of contents. If anybody has copies of these, please post them. There are also a few BTBs which we have included, but for which we would like to see the original HCOBs if anybody has them. Those are listed after the missing issues. To aid in gaining an historical perspective, we have also listed the other HCOPLs which we did not to include in this volume. Following that, we have placed the section of Pilot's Master List of LRH Tapes which applies to this time period to make it easy to find out which tapes were given at the time these bulletins were written. FREEZONE SUPERSET TECH VOLUME FOR 1963 CONTENTS: (The approximate line number of the beginning of each part is shown in parenthesis. This assumes that the repeated headers are removed from parts 2 to 14 and the parts are combined into a single large file) part 1 (622) 001 HCOB 1 JAN 63 ACADEMY CURRICULUM, HOW TO TEACH AUD. & ROUTINE 2 002 HCOB 3 JAN 63 OPPOSITION LISTS, RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE 006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS" 009 HCOPL 15 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2-12 011 HCOB 27 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2 SIMPLIFIED 012 Ed. Note: OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES 013 HCOB 1 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3, URGENT, ALL CL III AND IV AUDITORS 014 HCOPL 8 FEB 63 CURRICULUM CHANGE 015 HCOPL 9 FEB 63 SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS part 2 (2210) 016 HCOPL 11 FEB 63 AUDITING REGULATIONS 017 HCOB 11 FEB 63 CURRENT AUDITING 018 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 V UNIT 019 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 ACADEMY TAUGHT PROCESSES 020 HCOPL 14 FEB 63 HOW TO EXAMINE; THEORY EXAMINATIONS 021 HCOB 15 FEB 63 R2-R3, LISTING RULES 023 HCOB 20 FEB 63 R 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION (CANC.BY HCOB 21 MAY 63) 024 HCOPL 21 FEB 63 GOALS CHECK 025 HCOB 22 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3M, RUNDOWN BY STEPS 028 HCOB 25 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3-M GOAL FINDING BY METHOD B 029 HCOB 4 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A 030 HCOPL 6 MAR 63 SELLING TECHNIQUES FORBIDDEN 031 HCOB 6 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO HCOB OF FEB 22, 1963 R3M 034 HCOB 8 MAR 63 USE OF THE BIG MIDDLE RUDIMENTS 036 HCOB 9 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14 037 HCOB 10 MAR 63 VANISHED R/S OR RR 039 HCOB 13 MAR 63 THE END OF A GPM part 3 (4638) 040 HCOB 14 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-ROUTINE 3, ARC BREAKS, HANDLING OF 041 HCOPL 15 MAR 63 CHECKSHEET RATING SYSTEM 042 HCOB 17 MAR 63 R2-R3 CORRECTIONS TO 13 MAR 63 043 HCOB 18 MAR 63 R2-R3, IMPORTANT DATA, DON'T FORCE THE PC 044 HCOPL 23 MAR 63 CLASSIFICATION OF AUDITORS, CLASS II AND GOALS 045 HCOB 23 MAR 63 CLEAR AND OT 046 HCOB 29 MAR 63 SUMMARY OF SEC CHECKING (BTB?) (BY REG SHARP) 047 HCOPL 29 MAR 63 CLEAR REQUIREMENT 048 HCOB 30 MAR 63 ROUTINE 3M SIMPLIFIED part 4 (6639) 049 HCOB 2 APR 63 DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING TAPE OF 28 MARCH 1963 050 HCOB 6 APR 63 R3M2, WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IN CLEARING 051 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, LISTING AND NULLING 052 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, CORRECTED LINE PLOTS 053 HCOB 13 APR 63 R2G, ORIGINAL R2, 3GA, 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A AND OTHERS 054 HCOPL 13 APR 63 POLICY OF HGCS 055 HCOB 17 APR 63 R3M2 REDO GOALS FOUND ON THIS PATTERN 056 HCOB 18 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, DIRECTIVE LISTING 057 HCOPL 19 APR 63 HANDLING ORG TECHNICAL QUERIES 058 HCOB 23 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, HANDLING THE GPM part 5 (8680) 059 HCOB 24 APR 63 R3M2, TIPS, THE ROCKET READ OF A RELIABLE ITEM 060 HCOB 25 APR 63 METER READING TRS 061 HCOB 28 APR 63 ROUTINE 3, AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT 062 HCOB 29 APR 63 ROUTINE 3, DIRECTIVE LISTING, LISTING LIABILITIES 063 HCOB 29 APR 63 MODERNIZED TRAINING DRILLS USING PERMISSIVE COACHING 064 HCOB 30 APR 63 ROUTINE 3 065 HCOPL 30 APR 63 THE SAINT HILL STAFF CO-AUDIT 066 HCOB 4 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT NO. 2 067 HCOB 5 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, R3 STABLE DATA 068 HCOB 8 MAY 63 THE NATURE OF FORMATION OF THE GPM part 6 (10828) 071 HCOB 11 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3 HEAVEN 072 HCOB 12 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, RI FORM (GPM RI FORM CORRECTED) 073 HCOB 13 MAY 63 R3N DIRECTIVE LISTING WITH NEW R3 MODEL SESSION 074 Hand ?? Handwritten note in New Tech Vols 075 HCOB 15 MAY 63 THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, BULLETIN 1 076 HCOPL 15 MAY 63 INSTRUCTOR HATS 077 HCOB 20 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3N, PROPER PROGRAMING, FAST BLOWING RIS 078 HCOB 21 MAY 63 R3R MODEL SESSION (CANCELLED - HCOB 19 NOV 63) part 7 (12944) 081 HCOB 26 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, LINE PLOT (LINE PLOT FIRST SERIES CORRECTED) 082 HCOTF 26 MAY 63 LINE PLOT FIRST SERIES CORRECTED 083 HCOB 27 MAY 63 CAUSE OF ARC BREAKS 084 HCOPL 31 MAY 63 TRAINING OF CLEARS 085 HCOB 1 JUN 63 ROUTINE 2, NEW PROCESSES 086 HCOB 4 JUN 63 ROUTINE 3, HANDLING GPMS 088 HCOB 8 JUN 63 THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, #2 089 HCOPL 10 JUN 63 SCIENTOLOGY TRAINING, TECHNICAL STUDIES 090 HCOB 13 JUN 63 NEW TRAINING DRILLS part 8 (14946) 091 HCOPL 17 JUN 63 STAFF CLEARING PROGRAM 095 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 STUDENTS BLOWING (CANC PER OEC) 097 HCOB 24 JUN 63 ROUTINE 3, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, BULLETIN 3 099 HCOB 25 JUN 63 ROUTINE 2H, ARC BREAKS BY ASSESSMENT 100 HCOB 1 JUL 63 ROUTINE 3R, BULLETIN 4, PRELIMINARY STEP 101 HCOTF 1 JUL 63 LINE PLOT, FIRST SERIES HELOTROBUS IMPLANTS 102 HCOPL 3 JUL 63 CHANGE OF ROUTING ORG TECH REPORTS part 9 (16965) 103 HCOB 5 JUL 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS 104 HCOB 5 JUL 63 CCHS REWRITTEN 105 HCOB 9 JUL 63 A TECH SUMMARY, THE REQUIRED SKILLS OF PROC. AND WHY 106 HCOPL 9 JUL 63 HPA/HCA CERTIFICATE CHECKSHEET 109 HCOB 11 JUL 63 AUDITING RUNDOWN - MISSED W/H - TO BE RUN IN X1 UNIT 110 HCOB 14 JUL 63 ROUTINE 3N, LINE PLOTS 111 HCOB 17 JUL 63 ERRORS IN RUNNING 3N 112 HCOB 21 JUL 63 CO-AUDIT ARC BREAK PROCESS 113 HCOB 22 JUL 63 I YOU CAN BE RIGHT 114 HCOB 22 JUL 63 III ORG TECHNICAL, HGC PROCESSES AND TRAINING part 10 (19283) 115 HCOB 23 JUL 63 AUDITING RUNDOWN, MISSED W\Hs, TO BE RUN IN X1 UNIT 116 HCOPL 23 JUL 63 RETREADS ON SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE 117 HCOB 24 JUL 63 R3N CORRECTIONS 118 BTB 26 JUL 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY COACHING THEORY 119 HCOB 28 JUL 63 TIME AND THE TONE ARM 120 HCOB 29 JUL 63 SCIENTOLOGY REVIEW 121 HCOB 29 JUL 63 R3R-R3N-R3T, CAUTIONARY HCOB 122 HCOPL 30 JUL 63 CURRENT PLANNING 123 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 PUBLIC PROJECT ONE 124 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 SAINT HILL COURSE CHANGES 125 HCOB 4 AUG 63 E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR 126 HCOPL 8 AUG 63 PLANTS IN ACADEMIES - INTRO. OF FORM B (CANC PER OEC) 127 HCOB 9 AUG 63 DEFINITION OF RELEASE 129 HCOB 11 AUG 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS 130 HCOPL 12 AUG 63 CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS part 11 (21392) 131 HCOB 14 AUG 63 LECTURE GRAPHS 133 HCOB 19 AUG 63 HOW TO DO AN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT 134 HCOB 20 AUG 63 R3R-R3N, THE PRECLEAR'S POSTULATES 135 HCOPL 21 AUG 63 CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TARGETS, PROJECT 80, A PREVIEW 137 HCOB 22 AUG 63 PROJECT 80, THE ITSA LINE AND TONE ARM 138 HCOPL 22 AUG 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS ON STAFF 139 HCOB 24 AUG 63 R3N, THE TRAIN GPMS, THE MARCAB BETWEEN LIVES IMPLANTS 140 HCOB 1 SEP 63 I ROUTINE THREE SC 141 HCOB 1 SEP 63 II SCIENTOLOGY TWO, ROUTINE 1C 142 HCOIL 1 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY ONE 144 HCOB 6 SEP 63 INSTRUCTING IN SCN AUDITING, INSTRUCTOR'S TASK, part 12 (23547) 145 HCOB 9 SEP 63 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING 146 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA 148 HCOPL 18 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY FIVE SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS (CANC PER OEC) 149 HCOB 22 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY TWO PREPCHECK BUTTONS 150 HCOB 23 SEP 63 TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY 151 HCOPL 24 SEP 63 URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS (CANC. PER OEC) 152 HCOB 25 SEP 63 ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION 153 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC (CANC PER OEC) 156 BPL 27 SEP 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS 157 HCOB 28 SEP 63 ACTUAL GOALS part 13 (25318) 159 HCOB 1 OCT 63 HOW TO GET TONE ARM ACTION 161 HCOB 2 OCT 63 GPMS, EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS WITHDRAWN 162 HCOB 8 OCT 63 HOW TO GET TA, ANALYZING AUDITING 163 HCOPL 8 OCT 63 I NEW SAINT HILL CERTIFICATES AND COURSE CHANGES 165 HCOB 16 OCT 63 R3SC SLOW ASSESSMENT 166 HCOB 17 OCT 63 I R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS 167 HCOB 17 OCT 63 II R-2C SLOW ASMT. BY DYN. DIR. FOR USE OF HCOB OF OCT 17 168 HCOPL 28 OCT 63 STUDENT ARC BREAKS 169 HCOB 31 OCT 63 R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS, CONTINUED part 14 (27982) 170 HCOB 19 NOV 63 R3 MODEL SESSION REVISED (CANCELLED BY HCOB 20 APR 64) 171 TAL 21 NOV 63 DATA TAKEN FROM RECENT LRH LECTURE 173 HCOB 25 NOV 63 DIRTY NEEDLES 174 HCOPL 26 NOV 63 CERTIFICATE AND CLASS CHANGES, EVERYONE CLASSIFIED 175 HCOB 26 NOV 63 A NEW TRIANGLE, BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE, CASE ANALYSIS 176 HCOPL 4 DEC 63 ORG STAFF W/H CHECKS 177 HCOPL 6 DEC 63 ORG PROGRAMING 178 HCOIL 10 DEC 63 THE DANGEROUS ENVIRONMENT, THE TRUE STORY OF SCIENTOLOGY 179 HCOPL 11 DEC 63 CLASSIFICATION FOR EVERYONE 180 HCOPL 13 DEC 63 CO-AUDIT 181 HCOB 14 DEC 63 CASE ANALYSIS, HEALTH RESEARCH 182 HCOB 28 DEC 63 ROUTINE 6, INDICATORS, PART ONE: GOOD INDICATORS 185 MESSAGE LATE 63 DEC RON'S JOURNAL end of volume (29793) MISSING MATERIALS 003 HCOIL 5 JAN 63 A STATEMENT BY L. RON HUBBARD FOR THE PRESS 004 HCOIL 8 JAN 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 3 005 HCOIL 10 JAN 63 T.V. DEMONSTRATION OF T.R'S 007 HCOB 14 JAN 63 DEFINITION OF RELEASE (SEE 9 AUG 63) 008 HCOIL 15 JAN 63 THE DC SITUATION 010 HCOIL 16 JAN 63 OUR ROLE IN THE WORLD 022 HCOIL 17 FEB 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 4 026 HCOPL 22 FEB 63 CLEAR TEST 1963 027 HCOIL 22 FEB 63 TO MAGAZINES 032 HCOPL 6 MAR 63 R3M, HCO WW FORM G3, REVISED, FAST GOALS CHECK 033 HCOIL 7 MAR 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO 5 035 HCOAL 8 MAR 63 OPERATION OF BRITISH MARK V E-METER 038 HCOB 13 MAR 63 URGENT ADDL. CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14 (The corrections in #038 are integrated into #036 of 9 MAR 63) 046 HCOPL 23 MAR 63 CLEAR TEST 1963, ISSUE II 053 HCOPL 11 APR 63 GOALS FINDING AND GOALS FINDERS 058 HCOPL 22 APR 63 HAT OF COURSE ADMINISTRATOR (CANC 16 MAY 69) 069 HCOPL 8 MAY 63 SQUIRREL PROCESS INVESTIGATION 070 HCOIL 10 MAY 63 THE E-METER 079 HCOB 21 MAY 63 INQUISITIVE TRS (BTB?) 080 HCOPL 24 MAY 63 CHANGES IN BASEMENT STUDENT FACILITIES 087 HCOB 4 JUN 63 CHECKING OUT THE JOBURG, TIPS TO ... INSTRUCTORS (BTB?) 092 HCOPL 17 JUN 63 RAY KEMP & SAN DIEGO 093 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 TAPE RELEASE 094 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 SUSPENSION OF CERTS 096 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 POLICY CHECKS (CANC PER OEC) 098 HCOB 24 JUN 63 CORR. OF R3 ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS (CORR. ONE WORD) 107 BPL 9 JUL 63 METER DEMONSTRATION BOOTH HAT R. 5 AUG 75 108 HCOIL 9 JUL 63 A TREATISE ON THE E-METER 122 HCOB 29 JUL 63 SHSBC TRAINING DRILLS 128 HCOIL 9 AUG 63 PUBLIC MEETINGS 132 HCOPL 16 AUG 63 INDIV. AUDITORS OPERATING IN A CENTRAL ORG CONTROL AREA 136 HCOIL 21 AUG 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 6 143 HCOB 4 SEP 63 ASSESSMENT TRS 147 HCOIL 16 SEP 63 NEW SCIENTOLOGY BASIC DEFINITIONS 154 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 RIGHT TO REFUSE HPA/HCA STUDENT APPLICATION 155 HCOB 25 SEP 63 L&N FOR LOCKS, NOT RIS (COMP. FROM EARLIER HCOBS) 158 HCOPL 28 SEP 63 STUDENT ARC BREAKS (CANC PER OEC) 160 HCOB 1 OCT 63 TRAINING CYCLES (BTB?) (DISPATCH TO LRH FROM JOE BREEDEN) 164 HCOPL 8 OCT 63 DOCTORS OF SCIENTOLOGY 172 SECED 23 NOV 63 RON'S INSTRUCTIONS [KENNEDY ...] 183 HCOIL 17 DEC 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 7 184 HCOB 31 DEC 63 (CONFIDENTIAL) LOOKING FOR HCOB ORIGINALS OF BTBS 006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS" 118 BTB 26 JUL 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY COACHING THEORY 145 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA 163 HCOB 17 OCT 63 I R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS 164 HCOB 17 OCT 63 II R-2C SLOW ASMT. BY DYN. DIR. FOR USE OF HCOB OF OCT 17 166 HCOB 31 OCT 63 R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS, CONTINUED NOTE: HCOB 12 FEB 63 R2-12,3-21,AND 3GAXX-TIGER DRILLING FOR NULLING BY MID RUDS - this is omitted because it is an identical Franchise reissue of of HCOB 29 NOV 62 POLICIES ETC. NOT INCLUDED HCOPL 1 JAN 63 OBJECTIVE THREE CELEBRITIES HCOPL 4 JAN 63 PATTERN OF DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC) HCOPL 22 JAN 63 REISSUE SER 9 HATS & OTHER FOLDERS (REISS OF PL 15 SEP 59) HCOPL 1 FEB 63 HCO AREA 5%S (CANC. PER OEC) HCOPL 6 FEB 63 HCO AREA 5%S (CANC. PER OEC) HCOPL 7 FEB 63 REISS SER 10 ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATIONS (PL 28 JUL 59) HCOPL 13 FEB 63 10% DUE TO WW HCOPL 14 FEB 63 SHSBC REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS HCOPL 14 FEB 63 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRAL ORGS CONTROL AREAS HCOPL 19 FEB 63 CLASSIFICATION OF CENTRAL ORGS CONTROL AREAS HCOPL 20 FEB 63 THE EVOLUTION OF A DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC) HCOPL 21 FEB 63 THE EVOLUTION OF A DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC) HCOPL 25 FEB 63 SOUTH AFRICA PERSONNEL DIRECTORY HCOPL 28 FEB 63 DEPUTY HCO WW EXEC SEC HCOPL 12 MAR 63 STAFF PERSONNEL ALLOWANCE, SAINT HILL HCOPL 13 MAR 63 AMNESTY HCOPL 15 MAR 63 ORG DESPATCH ROUTINGS TO/FROM USA/CANADA HCOPL 18 MAR 63 DISTRICT OFFICE TESTING (CANC PER OEC) HCOPL 20 MAR 63 I HCO WW ELECTRIC STENCIL-CUTTING MACHINE HCOPL 20 MAR 63 II SELF-DETERMINISM IN CENTRAL ORGANIZATIONS HCOPL 23 MAR 63 POLICIES IN FORCE, ORG/ASSOC SECS, HCO SECS HCOPL 25 MAR 63 REISS SER 11 A MODEL HAT FOR AN EXECUTIVE (PL 19 SEP 58) HCOPL 2 APR 63 CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION HCOPL 2 APR 63 FOOD & CLEANING REGULATIONS STUDENTS HCOPL 4 APR 63 II DIRECTOR OF TRAINING WEEKLY STUDENT INTERVIEWS HCOPL 4 APR 63 IMPORTANT CHANGES IN TECH REPORTS TO WW HCOPL 4 APR 63 DISTRICT OFFICES TECH REPORTS TO WW HCOPL 4 APR 63 HCO TECH SEC WW DISBANDED HCOPL 5 APR 63 ORGANIZATION STUDENTS ON SAINT HILL COURSE HCOPL 5 APR 63 AUDIT OF ORGANIZATIONAL BOOKS (CANC 21 JAN 68) HCOPL 10 APR 63 REISS SER 12 WHAT AN EXEC WANTS ON HIS LINES (PL 26 MAY 59) HCOPL 11 APR 63 ORG DESPATCH ROUTINGS USA/CANADA HCOPL 11 APR 63 EMERGENCY LIBRARY HCOPL 11 APR 63 TECH DIR'S WEEKLY REPORT HCOPL 11 APR 63 APPOINTMENTS HCOPL 11 APR 63 MEMBERSHIPS HCOPL 16 APR 63 HCO EXECS CURRENT LISTS HCOPL 25 APR 63 RREV. 29 AUG 90 DUTIES OF A STAFF MEMBER HCOPL 2 MAY 63 REISS SER 13 HOW TO DO A STAFF JOB (REISS PL 11 APR 61) HCOPL 5 MAY 63 SEC ED; STAFF MEMBER ENROLLMENTS HCOPL 9 MAY 63 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL HCOPL 9 MAY 63 CHANGE IN REPORT LINE (CANC. PER OEC) HCOAL 10 MAY 63 THE PATTERN FOR AN HCO AREA SECRETARY HCOPL 10 MAY 63 STUDENT RATES FOR HGC AUDITING IN SA ORG (CANC PER OEC) SECED 10 MAY 63 MAIDS HAT HCOPL 13 MAY 63 SUPPLIES OF BOOKS TO SCIENTOLOGY ORGS (CANC PER OEC) SECED 20 MAY 63 SCIENTOLOGY MISSIONARY HAT HCOPL 25 MAY 63 PRESS RELATIONS (CANC 11 OCT 65) HCOPL 29 MAY 63 REISS SER 14 HOW TO HANDLE WORK (REISS OF HCOB 19 AUG 59) HCOPL 24 JUN 63 REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTS HCOPL 26 JUN 63 REISS SER 15, ROUTING OF COMM (REISS OF HCOB 25 FEB 58) HCOPL 26 JUN 63 RESUME OF FRANCHISE POLICY HCOPL 5 JUL 63 SALES OF LIFETIME MEMBERSHIPS OR SHARES HCOPL 19 JUL 63 REISS SER 16 ADMIN STABLE DATA (REISS OF SECED 4 MAY 59) HCOPL 23 JUL 63 APPOINTMENT (USA) HCOPL 26 JUL 63 CONTINENTAL DIRECTOR HAT WRITE-UP (CANC PER OEC) HCOPL 14 AUG 63 PRESS POLICIES (REISS AS PR SERIES 31) HCOPL 2 SEP 63 STAFF CHANGES HCOPL 3 SEP 63 STATUS OF AUCKLAND HCOPL 7 SEP 63 COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE, SCN JURISPRUDENCE, ADMIN OF HCOPL 10 SEP 63 REISS 17 THE CREDO OF A GOOD & SKILLED MGR(HCOB 22 APR 59) HCOPL 22 SEP 63 CONCERNING COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE HCOPL 3 OCT 63 APPOINTMENT HCOPL 4 OCT 63 TECHNICAL COUNCIL HCOPL 7 OCT 63 FIRE SECURITY DOORS HCOPL 23 OCT 63 REFUND POLICY HCOPL 30 OCT 63 REISS 18 CONCERNING CITY OFFICES HCOPL 4 NOV 63 PAY CARD HCOPL 11 NOV 63 COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE HCOPL 22 NOV 63 APPOINTMENT HCOPL 27 DEC 63 THE "MAGIC" OF GOOD MANAGEMENT HCOPL 31 DEC 63 SH RE-ORGANIZATION ******************** From Pilot's Master List of LRH Tapes. See the full Master List (available at fza.org, fzint.org, etc.) for more info. on his complilation. ============ TAPES OF 1963 ============= Briefing course cassetts Level I contain new numbers 233 to 292 Briefing course cassetts Level J contain new numbers 293 to 360 Briefing course cassetts Level K contain new numbers 361 to 420 SHSBC-226 ren 253 8 Jan R2-10 and R2-12 SHSBC-227 ren 254 8 Jan Case Repair SHSBC-228 ren 255 10 Jan R2-12 SHSBC-229 ren 256 10 Jan How to Audit > Interview 10 Jan St. Hill Interview (LRH with Australian press) SHSBC-230 ren 257 15 Jan R2-12 Dead Horses SHSBC-231 ren 258 15 Jan R2-12 Nerves (labled Nevers on new list) TVD-16 ren BC-259 16 Jan TV Demo: TR 0 Demonstration SHSBC-232 ren 260 16 Jan TR 0 Lecture SHSBC-233 ren 261 6 Feb Instructors' Conference SHSBC-234 ren 262 7 Feb R3MX, Part I SHSBC-235 ren 263 7 Feb R3MX, Part II SHSBC-236 ren 264 12 Feb Routine 3M SHSBC-237 ren 265 13 Feb TV Demo: Ruds and Havingness SHSBC-238 ren 266 13 Feb Discussion of TV Demo Sessions SHSBC-239 ren 267 14 Feb Routine 3M Data SHSBC-240 ren 268 19 Feb Rundown on Processes TVD ... ren 269 20 Feb TV Demo: Finding RRs SHSBC-241 ren 270 20 Feb Talk on TV Demo -- Finding RRs SHSBC-242 ren 271 21 Feb R2 and R3: Current Auditing Rundown SHSBC-243 ren 272 26 Feb R3M: Current Rundown by Steps SHSBC-246 ren 273 27 Feb TV Demo: Case Repair (TVD-17) SHSBC-246A 27 Feb TV Demo cont.(TVD-17A) SHSBC-244 ren 274 28 Feb Goals Problem Mass SHSBC-245 ren 275 5 Mar R2 and R3: Urgent Data SHSBC-247 ren 276 7 Mar When Faced with the Unusual Do the Usual SHSBC-248 ren 277 19 Mar R3M: How to Find Goals SHSBC-249 .... 13 Mar Auditing & Assessing -- supposedly was a replay of SHSBC-185 of 14 AUG 62 originally titled "World Clearing" SHSBC-250 .... 19 Mar Flattening A Process -- supposedly was a replay of CSC-1 of 1 SEP 62 originally titled "Presentation of the GPM" TVD-18 ren BC-278 20 Mar TV Demo: Rudiments and Havingness Session and Short Lecture (LRH audits Reg Sharp) SHSBC-251 ren 279 21 Mar R2G Series SHSBC-252 ren 280 26 Mar Case Repair SHSBC-254 ren 281 27 Mar (TVD-19) TV Demo: Sec Checking -- with Comments by LRH (Reg Sharp audits Leslie Van Der Statten) SHSBC-253 ren 282 28 Mar The GPM SHSBC-256 ren 283 2 Apr GPM Items SHSBC-255 ren 284 4 Apr Anatomy of the GPM SHSBC-257 ren 285 16 Apr Top of the GPM SHSBC-258 ren 286 18 Apr Directive Listing On a Saturday afternoon at Saint Hill, LRH gave these two lectures to professional Scientologists and students currently on course in the Academy of Scientology in London. PAC-1 ren BC-286a 20 Apr What Clearing Is PAC-2 ren BC-286b 20 Apr Basic Purpose SHSBC-259 ren 287 23 Apr Goals SHSBC-260 ren 288 25 Apr Finding Goals SHSBC-261 ren 289 30 Apr Pattern of the GPM SHSBC-262 ren 290 2 May Running the GPM SHSBC-263 ren 291 14 May Implant GPMs SHSBC-264 ren 292 15 May TV Demo 20: Blocking Out and Dating Incidents SHSBC-265 ren 293 16 May The Time Track SHSBC-266 ren 294 21 May The Helatrobus Implants SHSBC-267 ren 295 22 May (TVD-21) TV Demo: Engram Running -- Helatrobus Implant Goal (LRH audits MSH) (the above 2 tapes are available online at operation clambake) SHSBC-268 ren 296 23 May State of OT SHSBC-269 ren 297 28 May Handling ARC Breaks SHSBC-270 ren 298 29 May Programing Cases, Part I SHSBC-271 ren 299 30 May Programing Cases, Part II SHSBC-272 ren 300 11 Jun Engram Chain Running SHSBC-273 ren 301 12 Jun ARC Straightwire SHSBC-274 ren 302 13 Jun Levels of Case SHSBC-275 ren 303 18 Jun Beingness SHSBC-276 ren 304 19 Jun Summary of Modern Auditing SHSBC-277 ren 305 20 Jun History of Psychotherapy SHSBC-278 ren 306 25 Jun Modern Processes SHSBC-279 ren 307 26 Jun TV Demo: Listing Assmt for Engram Running, I SHSBC-280 ren 308 27 Jun TV Demo: Listing Assmt for Engram Running, II SHSBC-281 ren 309 9 Jul The Free Being SHSBC-282 ren 310 10 Jul Auditing Skills for R3R SHSBC-284a ren 311 10 Jul Aud Session: Preliminary Steps of R3R, Part I SHSBC-284b ren 312 10 Jul Aud Session: Preliminary Steps of R3R, Part II SHSBC-283 ren 313 11 Jul ARC Breaks SHSBC-285 ren 314 16 Jul Tips on Running R3R SHSBC-286 ren 315 17 Jul Dating SHSBC-287 ren 316 18 Jul Errors in Time SHSBC-288 ren 317 23 Jul Between Lives Implants SHSBC-289 ren 318 24 Jul ARC Breaks and the Comm Cycle SHSBC-290 ren 319 25 Jul Comm Cycles in Auditing SHSBC-291 ren 320 6 Aug Auditing Comm Cycles SHSBC-292 ren 321 7 Aug R2H Fundamentals SHSBC-293 ren 322 8 Aug R2H Assessment SHSBC-294 ren 323 14 Aug Auditing Tips SHSBC-295 ren 324 15 Aug The Tone Arm SHSBC-296 ren 325 20 Aug The Itsa Line SHSBC-297 ren 326 21 Aug The Itsa Line (cont.) SHSBC-298 ren 327 22 Aug Project 80 SHSBC-299 ren 328 27 Aug Rightness and Wrongness SHSBC-300 ren 329 28 Aug The Tone Arm and the Service Facsimile SHSBC-301 ren 330 29 Aug The Service Facsimile SHSBC-302a ren 331 3 Sep R3SC SHSBC-302 ren 332 4 Sep How to Find a Service Facsimile SHSBC-303 ren 333 5 Sep Service Fac Assessment SHSBC-304 ren 334 10 Sep Destimulation of a Case SHSBC-306 ren 335 11 Sep Service Facs and GPMs SHSBC-305 ren 336 12 Sep Service Facsimiles SHSBC-307 ren 337 17 Sep What You Are Auditing SHSBC-308 ren 338 18 Sep Saint Hill Service Facsimile Handling SHSBC-309 ren 339 19 Sep Routine 4M TA SHSBC-... ren 340 24 Sep Summary I SHSBC-310 ren 341 25 Sep Summary II: Scientology 0 SHSBC-311 ren 342 26 Sep Summary III: About Level IV Auditing SHSBC-312 ren 343 15 Oct Essentials of Auditing SHSBC-313 ren 344 16 Oct The Itsa Maker Line SHSBC-314 ren 345 17 Oct Level IV Auditing SHSBC-315 ren 346 21 Oct Attack and GPMs SHSBC-316 ren 347 22 Oct The Integration of Auditing SHSBC-317 ren 348 23 Oct Auditing the GPM SHSBC-318 ren 349 29 Oct Routine 4 SHSBC-319 ren 350 30 Oct R4 Case Assembly SHSBC-320 ren 351 31 Oct R4M2 Programing SHSBC-321 ren 352 5 Nov Three Zones of Auditing SHSBC-322 ren 353 7 Nov Relationship of Training to OT > ... 11 Nov Interview with Sat. Evening Post - 1 > ... 11 Nov Interview with Sat. Evening Post - 2 SHSBC-323 ren 354 26 Nov R4 Auditing > ... 28 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH - 1 > ... 28 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH = 2 SHSBC-330 ren 355 28 Nov TV Demo 25: Auditing Demo with Comments by LRH SHSBC-324 ren 356 28 Nov Seven Classifications > ... 29 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH > ... 2 Dec PT Truncated GPM, LRH auditing MSH > ... 2 Dec Finding a Next Goal, LRH auditing MSH SHSBC-325 ren 357 3 Dec Certifications and Classifications SHSBC-326 ren 358 4 Dec TV Demo 24: Basic Auditing -- Lecture and Demo > ... 2 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH SHSBC-327 ren 359 5 Dec Basic Auditing > SHSBC-327E 10 Dec The Dangerous Environment SHSBC-328 ren 360 10 Dec Scientology Zero > ... 11 Dec Session Goals to Do and Think SHSBC-329 ren 361 12 Dec Summary of OT Processes > ... 13 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH > ... 15 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH > ... 20 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH > ... 22 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH > ... 23 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH > SC-1A 30 Dec Summary of R6, Part 1 > SC-1B 30 Dec Summary of R6, Part 2 > SC-2 30 Dec Objects of the Mind, Part 1 > SC-3 30 Dec Objects of the Mind, Part 2 > ... 31 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH SH Spec-1 ren 362 31 Dec Indicators **************************** FREEZONE TECH VOLUME 1963 ================== 001 HCOB 1 JAN 63 ACADEMY CURRICULUM, HOW TO TEACH AUD. & ROUTINE 2 (TV5 p. 227-9, NTV VII p. 4-8) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Central Orgs HCO BULLETIN OF 1 JANUARY AD13 ACADEMY CURRICULUM HOW TO TEACH AUDITING AND ROUTINE 2 INTRODUCTION With the placing of a clearing technology into HCA/HPA hands, we must revise our concept of training. Routine 2-12 is complicated and exact. But as it is the only thing known which cracks all cases, we have no choice in the matter. We can and must learn it well. It must not be indifferently learned. But as it is not going to change as is well proven, time and effort can be spent upon it and must be. We must rise to the occasion. We must use all we know to learn and teach all we have to teach to get Routine 2 done. CHECK SHEETS There are two distinctly different series of check sheets for doing Routine 2 processes and auditing. These are: (a) Those that apply to Routine 2, the GPM and data listing, nulling and case errors and repair; (b) Those that apply to auditing, its basics, skills, the meter. Although these associate and interlock, they are two separate subjects of study. For years we have faced the arbitrary that those whose cases got in the road of their auditing yet had to assimilate auditing theory and practice. Routine 2 well done removes with some rapidity these case barriers to auditing. Therefore there are several phases desirable in studying auditing and Routine 2. V UNIT CLASS 0 FIRST PHASE For a new student, doing Routine 2-10 precedes study of auditing and Routine 2. This is done under close supervision on a co-audit basis with the Co-audit Supervisor taking a hand on cases, checking out Items, correcting cases, etc. This is done until the student has found in another and has had found in himself 2 or 3 packages. Accuracy is the essence of this first step, otherwise the wasted time and wrong Items will give the whole action the tone of despair. Only good results are stressed, not the form of how they are achieved. In this first phase we want the student to see that Routine 2 produces changes for the better in himself and the pc and is worth learning. This is what we're trying to show. We remove, if the Routine 2 is good, the barriers to learning auditing and Scientology. All we want then from the first phase is: (a) Reality on the benefits of the process and auditing; and (b) Removal of the barriers to being a good auditor. W UNIT CLASS Ia SECOND PHASE This phase actually starts the training of a Scientologist. He or she, however, should have started its check sheets in the V unit. We teach the basics of Scientology, its history, the Auditor's Code, Axioms, the ARC triangle and Tone Scale out of the old Notes on Lectures booklet. In practical and auditing we teach and do objective processes, Op Pro by Dup and the CCHs. We wish to accomplish this in this phase: (a) A Reality that Scientology is a real subject and very precise, not a mixture of Indian philosophy and cute tricks, and give the student solid grounding on pure Scientology basics, disrelated from auditing; and (b) Get the student capable of repetition of commands and unafraid in actual physical handling of other bodies. X UNIT CLASS Ib THIRD PHASE We now enter the student upon a phase of formal auditing consisting of theory and practical, using all the basics of auditing, the TRs, the meter, fine points. This phase should specialize in basic auditing skills, very precisely applicable to handling an auditing session, a meter, meter drills, anti Q and A, TRs 0-4, Model Session, Mid Ruds, Missed Withholds, etc. And we get the student to run formal processes on the Meter until he or she understands a meter. These processes consist only of ARC Straight Wire, comm processes, nothing that will disturb 2-12 or run out Rockslams. The idea of this auditing is to get the student used to handling a session with competence. From this phase we expect: (a) The basics of auditing in theory and practical; and (b) Confidence in confronting a bank and handling a pc on a meter with good form. Y UNIT CLASS IIa FOURTH PHASE In the fourth phase our interest is in Prepchecking as an action and a prelude to lists in the form of a Problems Intensive. In theory and practical we teach how to do a Problems Intensive, advanced metering, how to detect case changes, better sessioning, more TRs 0-4, more basics of Scientology such as Axioms and Logics. In auditing, the student does a Problems Intensive and receives one. The stress is on good sessioning and RESULTS. From this phase we expect: (a) A good command of a Problems Intensive theory and practical, how to detect case changes; and (b) The ability to actually audit to a good result and keep Mid Ruds in and CLEAN A NEEDLE. Z UNIT CLASS IIb FIFTH PHASE This is a theory and practical phase for Routine 2-12. The student also audits Routine 2-12 under supervision. The whole check sheet for Routine 2-12 is thrown at the student. The long HCO Bulletins are segmented into a page or two and thereby made into several passes (the student studies and is examined on them in segments). In auditing, the student is permitted to do full 2-12 and the stress is on RESULTS with accurate Routine 2-12. PG UNIT - CLASS II SIXTH PHASE This is a post-graduate phase on Routine 2-12. It was formerly known as "Interne". The theory and practical are all on the stress of CASE REPAIR and how to supervise Routine 2. The student is used to help supervise V unit students as his auditing activity with stress on case errors. The remainder of the student's time is taken up with preparation for examination for his HCA/HPA. The student may be used for charity cases and what was formerly Interne work. SUMMARY This is about a three months' course if steamed through. If it takes longer, then the V unit was flubbed. If a student hangs up longer than a reasonable time in any upper phase, he is returned to the V unit and is required to do and receive Routine 2 while continuing to try to pass upper level check sheets so as not to hold him up. Students are, of course, expected to study evenings and week-ends. The three section course plan is adhered to of Theory, Practical and Auditing. Auditing in the Auditing Section is done for RESULTS, not to teach auditing. Practical is where they practice. Students are progressively assigned to their units and are re-classed as they pass out of a unit. The Model of this Course is Saint Hill but it may not be so advertised. The chief difference of course is the necessary re-introduction of a student body tape programme such as in the old days. The last hour of the day is used for this. A sequence of about 75 tapes, mainly of general historical or auditing interest, are played to the whole student body, assembled in the main assembly hall, one tape each day, regardless of the students' classification. They are given quizzes on these tapes, very brief. No other tape use is made in an Academy. There are no headphone recorders. If tape play speakers are not good the students won't learn anything from the tapes. When tapes are omitted as a whole class activity, the whole direction, meaning and ethic of Scientology goes sour in an area and the students haven't a clue what Scientology is for and you find them idling about driving off pcs with nutty chatter. This Academy Curriculum requires a D of T and two instructors. To this can be added a Training Admin who is also Extension Course. The D of T becomes Auditing Supervisor, the other two instructors are the Theory Supervisor and Practical Supervisor. The Classes are awarded on the Completion of the phase and designate the check sheets. Students get cancelled out of units but not off check sheets. The only things that can keep students from passing through this course rapidly are (a) failure to schedule precisely, (b) failure to demand and obtain auditing results in all units, (c) local non-comprehension of R2-12, (d) capricious and unreal theory and practical examinations and (e) failure to enforce the course regulations. A full Academy will attend to all these things. An empty one will have ignored them. It is no real sin to do a lousy job of auditing. It is a terrible crime to do a bad job of training and dissemination because then there's nothing left to pick the cases up in this life or the next. Every bad auditor we turn out costs us a hundred preclears. Every good one puts us closer to our objectives. An Academy Class II should be good enough to go to work at once as an HGC auditor without causing the HGC a moment's worry. It can be done because it must be. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.rd Copyright c 1962 by L.Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 002 HCOB 3 JAN 63 OPPOSITION LISTS, RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE (TV5 p. 230-2, NTV VII p. 9-12) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY AD13 Central Orgs Franchise ROUTINE 2 IMPORTANT OPPOSITION LISTS RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE Most PT terminals and oppterms look more like Coterms than clean Terminals or Opposition Terminals when first contacted. They become more definite Terms or Oppterms after they have been listed a page. While you should be able to make the right choice in most cases by the usual test given in the 2-12 steps you can err. Your lists will become endless and unnullable and your pc will go downhill if you oppose an RI wrong way to. Therefore, while listing, carefully observe the needle and the pc. The TA is meaningless in this test. The Indications for testing "Right Way Oppose" and "Wrong Way Oppose" are the subject of this bulletin. In opposing a Reliable Item you can consider it a Terminal (because pc said it gave pain) and list "Who or What would a Catfish oppose?" Whereas in actual fact it was an Oppterm and should have been listed "Who or What would oppose a Catfish?" Or Vice Versa. Sad consequences follow a wrong choice. POTENTIAL MISCALLING AN RI Even the best auditor can make a mistake in calling an RI he's gotten a Terminal or an Oppterm. The pc is foggy as to what's pain or sensation. The RI may have both. Sometimes Terminals are so covered with Sen there is no pain at first. Sometimes the hidden Terminal is so hard down on the Oppterm RI it seems like a Terminal. Further, you can be doing an Opposition to an RI list, expecting a Terminal to come up and get, in fact, another Oppterm. This is fine. Accept it if the list only RSed once on nulling. But the opposing Terminal is still hidden and must be gotten. Pcs, you see, often put Terms and Oppterms on the same list. STABLE DATUM: Always regard the identity of an RI as a Term or Oppterm as potentially wrong until listed and tested as per this HCO Bulletin. Do the best you can with usual tests to tell what it is before you start listing and choose your oppose question accordingly. But be ready to find that what was a Terminal is really an Oppterm or vice versa and should have been opposed "the other way around". You have only two list questions to use in opposing a Reliable Item. These are "Who or What would oppose a __________ ?" and "Who or What would a __________ oppose?" For every Reliable Item there is only one of the above that is right. The other is wrong. There are no true Coterms - they only seem to be both a Terminal (pain) and an Oppterm (sensation). When it comes to listing you will benefit the pc only by listing the right way. The other oppose question then is the wrong way. If you list the "wrong way" (using the wrong question), you'll get an ENDLESS LIST that never completes and won't nul. You therefore have a choice of two questions and one of them is right and the other wrong, always. If you choose the right one and list it, the pc benefits. If you choose the wrong one and list it the pc will get worse rapidly, right in the session before your eyes. It often happens that you start listing the wrong way. This is because you failed to find out correctly if the RI you were about to list an opposition list to was a Terminal (pain) or an Opposition Terminal (sensation). The pc said he had "sen" but actually felt "pain". Or the pc did have "sen" and the pain appeared afterward. In short, because PT Terminals look like Coterms very often, neither the pc nor the auditor can tell on some RIs. This happens to some RIs on every case. The solution to the dilemma is to test by listing a page or two. There are certain definite signs of wrong way opposition. They can be seen with half an eye. There is no need to go on until your pc is caved in and you have 99 pages of Items to find out you can't nul and should have opposed the other way around. A list right way to or wrong way to will Rockslam, so that's no test in itself. The tests, five in number, are a little more delicate: Aside from original tests for Term or Oppterm, how to tell if an oppose list is right way to: RIGHT WAY INDICATIONS 1. In Listing needle is loose and gets looser; 2. Pc's skin tone gets progressively better as he or she lists; 3. Masses move out off pc; 4. Pc gives Items easily; 5. List completes easily. WRONG WAY OPPOSE INDICATIONS If List is wrong way oppose (which is to say the wording is reversed, such as "Who or What would oppose a Catfish?" as different from "Who or What would a Catfish oppose?") these things will always happen: 1. In listing, the needle gets tighter, stiff and tends to jerk. It goes in cycles, DR, RS, DR, clean, DR, RS, DR, clean, etc; 2. The pc's skin tone gets progressively worse, darker and off color and the pc looks older; 3. Masses move into the pc and make him feel more or less squashed; 4. Pc gives Items with some small difficulty and tends to invalidate them and RI being listed from; 5. List doesn't ever complete. You may be able to nul a while but the needle will dirty up and no amount of Mid Ruds will clean it. Whether your list is right way oppose or wrong way oppose the pc may get pain and sensation, even nausea. Indeed, be worried only if the pc doesn't. These don't count. Pain and Sensation are used for the first test you make in selection. But aren't used beyond that test given in the Steps of 2-12. It's the darkening color of the pc and his or her apparent age that count. Your tests above are visual not getting data from the pc. Pcs will list wrong way to and plow themselves right on in with no complaint. If you start listing wrong way to, and then turn it around, the pc will have trouble giving right way to Items for a bit, and then they come at a rapid easy flow and you get all the above 5 things for the right way list. Unless you change around to the right way and continue to list the wrong way you will continue to get the 5 indications given for wrong lists. Sometimes an RI is so fouled up you have to test by listing one way, then the other and then back to the first way again. A little experience is solid gold, for you begin to see the 5 indications for right lists and the 5 indications for wrong lists and recognize them more quickly. When you have opposed wrongly and then, in opposing right way to you get a complete list, you never bother to nul the wrong way list. You just abandon it. The RI won't be on it. You only nul the right way oppose list. Rule: Never nul lists taken from wrong sources. Just abandon. No list ever went to 50 pages that was right way to. Right Way Oppose Lists that can be completed are probably all below 500 Items, the usual being around 250 Items. Wrong Way Oppose is the chief source of difficulty for any opposition list, rivalled only by Incomplete Lists as a trouble maker in Routine 2. A wrong way oppose list is of course "Wrong Source" as one is using "Catfish" as a Terminal instead of "Catfish" as an Oppterm or vice versa. Endless lists also come from just continuing to list on and on and on, the pc's needle being dirty by "Protest". This is just silly. Some supervisor may develop as a stable datum, "If the needle is dirty, just continue listing." And this is wrong. A needle does get clean when a right way oppose list is completed. But wrong way oppose or Mid Ruds Out can also make a needle dirty. On an oppose list, if a needle is dirty three main things can be wrong: 1. List is right way oppose but incomplete. Remedy: Complete it to one RS only seen on nulling. 2. List is wrong way oppose. Remedy: Oppose it the other way and watch the signs (above) until you're sure. Then go on and complete. 3. Mid Ruds are out - pc protesting the session or overlisting. Wrong Source (opposing a wrong item) can mess up a pc also. But why'd you take an Item from an incomplete or wrong way list in the first place and then oppose it? The remedy of this one lies before the fact of wrong way oppose, so is not the subject of this HCO Bulletin. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L.Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS" [Not in either set of tech volumes. This was originally an HCOB and was later reissued as a BTB. We do not have the original HCOB version, but this BTB should be close. It is from a Level 0 pack of the late 70's. If someone has an older unrevised version, please post it. - Ed.] BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 14 JANUARY 1963 REISSUED 25 JULY 1974 AS BTB CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JANUARY 1963 SAME TITLE Remimeo All Auditors RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS" NOTE: This datum was already known to me about rings but this is the most severe case I've heard of. L. RON HUBBARD The following dispatch, sent in by Terry Milner and Joe Fortner, staff members of Los Angeles, describes a phenomenon which can be caused by a PC wearing rings: "A dispatch on a matter which I consider quite urgent. Since being audited quite a few rock slams have been observed on me. In the rudimentss, on lists, between comm lags, button checks, in fact any method of auditing which required the use of an E-Meter. With the advent of R2-12 I had many lists, all chock full of items that had rock slammed at one time or another. The supposedly phantom rock slam served to hang up many sessions and auditing became quite a drag even though one true package was found in spite of the rock slams that went on forever. Recently I was sent to get HGC auditing and the rock slams were ever present until my Auditor, Joe Fortner, got a little suspicious and had me take off the two rings I wore, one on either hand. They disappeared. Hundreds of things that had rock slammed no longer rock slammed. Hundreds of almost, not quite reliable items are dead now and in all truth, most them have no meaning to me anyway. Perhaps you know of this condition set up by the PC wearing rings.......the thing is most audititors do not, nor do most PCs. Revised by Training & Services Aide Approved by L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER for the BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:RS:rs Copyright c 1963, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 009 HCOPL 15 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2-12 (OEC vol 4 p 563, NTV VII p. 13) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Central Orgs AIl HGCs HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 JANUARY 1963 ROUTINE 2-12 When the six lectures of 8 Jan., 10 Jan. and 15 Jan. 63 are in your hands and understood by staff auditors, the Sec EDs banning Routine 2-12 on HGC pcs are at end. These lectures alter to some extent the original format of Routines 2-10 and 2-12 by removing arbitrary assessment lists and using only lists completed by the pc. All case repair data is also contained in these lectures. They also give methods of avoiding endless lists, dead horses and skunks. HCOBs will eventually condense all this material. However, various emergencies have inhibited the condensation and correction of the data except in lecture form. The above-mentioned lectures take priority over and correct all earlier bulletins and lectures, as they contain two months' experience in observing errors being made in application by auditors, needful indicators and correction of points that were giving trouble. Routine 2 is being in general very successful and has been getting better case gains than any earlier process. However, Routine 2 is complicated and exact and can worsen cases where applied without complete knowledge. It is urgent that Objective One be completed and that auditors who have no R2-12 seal have this pointed out to them. Squirrel versions should be mercilessly stamped on, as they cannot compete with the thousands of hours of case experience which has gone into creating Routine 2, and can bring disrepute to Scientology. Accurate R2 repairs inaccurate R2 and is the only process that will repair it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 011 HCOB 27 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2 SIMPLIFIED (TV5 p. 233-8, NTV VII p. 14-21) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex CenOCon Franchise Students HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JANUARY 1963 URGENT ROUTINE 2 - SIMPLIFIED (Communicator: Mimeo AT ONCE and RUSH TO ALL TECH DIVISIONS) I will shortly release Routine 2-12A which will incorporate Routine 2-10 and 2-12 with enormous simplification. While the basic processes and purposes remain the same, I have worked out a number of simplifications that are greatly needed. Having seen some of the trouble with R2-10 and 12, I have been furiously working to improve Indicators. I've now proved out some invariable indicators that will completely wipe out flubs if followed exactly as given in this HCO Bulletin. If they don't work for you, the R2 being done is from wrong source. These indicators are not wrong. I have also succeeded in developing a system in 2-12A that eliminates nulling, thus saving half the auditing time, and eliminates Tiger Drilling - a weak spot for HPAs. As the sessions can be run with almost no Mid Ruds or ruds, this leaves auditors with only an RS to see on the meter and cuts out almost all other meter reading. R2 then comes much more easily into the realm of Co-Audit. If you don't get results from R2 it's being done wrong. I've got the variables pretty well licked. Until the full release of R2-12A, incorporate these changes which belong to 2-12A into any R2 you are doing or supervising. Change over at once. Abandon the old way where it conflicts as these data below will keep you out of trouble and stop some of the glaring errors being done. Apply these below to any 2-10 or 2-12 currently being done. TONE ARM The Tone Arm is used in R2-12A. On any list done on a preclear, whether source, represent or oppose, RUN ALL THE TONE ARM ACTION OUT OF THE LISTING. LIST AT LEAST 50 ITEMS BEYOND THE POINT THE TONE ARM BECAME MOTIONLESS. Keep the tone arm readings in the left margin of the list column. Note TA action about every 5 Items or at every change. In a wrong-way-to oppose list, the TA tends to be more stationary. If you don't run the TA action out and at least 50 Items beyond, plus 50 Items beyond the last RS seen on listing, the list will be incomplete. Sometimes several pages have to be listed with a motionless TA before the final RS comes on the list but ordinarily the final RS comes within 50 Items after the TA has been motionless for 50 Items. LIST BEYOND LAST RS List at least 50 Items beyond the last RS on the list. Do not stop listing with the last RSing Item. If you do you can be fooled. If you get a new RS in the 50, list 50 more beyond that and so on. TEST LIST BOTH WAYS List a few Items on each way oppose as a conclusive test to find right way oppose. The needle gets stiffer on the wrong way oppose. THE NEEDLE LOOKS LOOSER ON RIGHT WAY OPPOSE. If you still can't decide, again test either way until you are sure. Use all normal tests but list a little each way to be sure. WRONG WAY LIST A list is wrong way to if 1. The list doesn't RS. 2. The RSes on the list increase in incidence - more RSes per Item on later pages. (The number is quite marked.) 3. The pc looks darker and mass is pulling in on the pc. 4. The list is inordinately long - 40-50 pages. 5. The needle gets tighter and stiffer as you list (the most noticeable test). (A needle also gets tighter on an added to list if you didn't read the right Item to the pc.) VANISHED RS If a case has RSed and suddenly can't be made to no matter what you do, the RS is swallowed into some earlier incomplete or fumbled action. Go back and handle the earlier action correctly. Sometimes an Item grabbed off an incomplete source list (but never use one that was found by representing an RSing Item) has to be handled fully to get the RS back. Example: Incomplete Parts of Existence List. "God" RSed heavily on it. Some auditor grabbed it and opposed it. List abandoned when directions came to use Items only from complete source lists. Eight Reliable Items later, RSes on the case vanish or get tiny. Pc's PTPs heavy and not being resolved by R2. Solution: Go back and get the "God" package complete. The big RS will come back on. (Make sure it's opposed right way to this time.) FOUR ITEM PKGs The biggest change from 2-12 to 2-12A is the four Item Package. Always get four Items in a row. Complete any existing 2 or 3 Item packages on a case to 4 Items whether the last Reliable Item found still RSes or not. The four are: (1) Reliable Item taken from a completed source list. (2) Reliable Item taken by opposing (1). (3) Reliable Item taken by opposing (2). (4) Reliable Item taken by opposing (3). It will be found that (4) is in opposition also to (1) if all was done correctly. All lists (1) to (4) must be complete, to no TA action and beyond, right-way-to opposition in each case. Where a represent enters in (which is seldom), there are five lists for four Items. These are: (1) Source list (complete to no TA for 50 Items but no RS). (2) Represent list from last Item in on source list. This is RSing Item. This is the first RI. List must be complete. (3) Oppose list on RI found in (2) just above. This gives second RI. (4) Oppose list on RI found in (3). This gives third RI. (5) Oppose list or RI found in (4). This gives fourth RI. Whether you get your first RI from an oppose or represent list, you always wind up with 4 RIs. PACKAGING A package always consists of Two RIs that are terminals and Two RIs that are oppterms. The terminals oppose either oppterm, one better than the other. This is two packages 2-12 style, one pkg 2-12A style. The Term-Oppterm of each pair must be of same order of magnitude. The auditor has no business with the significances of Items. He never suggests an Item or goal. He never rejects one because of significance. Here is an actual package. 1st RI found, Oppterm RELIGION; 2nd RI found, Terminal A CONQUEROR; 3rd RI found, Oppterm PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS; 4th RI found, Terminal A DISEMBODIED SPIRIT. PACKAGE TERM Oppterm A Disembodied Spirit -----> Religion \ / \------\ /-----/ X /------/ \-------\ / \ A Conqueror ----------> Public Communications [Ed. note: in the diagram, each of the two terminals has an arrow pointed at each of the two oppterms, giving 4 lines with the two center ones crossing over each other in the middle] In a 2-12A package you have to have 2 terminals and two oppterms, opposing and cross opposing as above. Otherwise you've goofed and will the pc hedge and ARC break! Oh, my! The sequence may be (1) Oppterm RI, (2) Term RI, (3) Oppterm RI, (4) Term RI, or it may be (1) Represent Item, (2) Oppterm RI, (3) Term RI, (4) Oppterm RI, (5) Term RI. Or it may be (1) Term RI, (2) Oppterm RI, (3) Term RI, (4) Oppterm RI, or (1) Represent Item, (2) Term RI, (3) Oppterm RI, (4) Term RI, (5) Oppterm RI. Always 4 RIs, always 2 Terms, always 2 Oppterms. If they don't come out that way then one of the lists was wrong way to or incomplete or both. NULLING R2-12A doesn't nul a full RSing list. Only a non-RS list to be represented gets nulled. And these are infrequently needed. One completes the list to no TA action plus 50 or more Items and then 50 Items beyond the last RS seen on listing. The 50-50 rule is minimum, not maximum. It sometimes must be more. One tells the pc that one is going to read him the next to last RS and does so. If it RSes, one adds to the list until a new RSing Item is seen and 50 Items beyond it. Then one reads the now next to last RSing Item again. (No Tiger Drill.) Auditor tells pc: "This is the next to the last RSing Item, not THE Item." When the next to last RSing Item does not RS on reading it to the pc (no TD), one then tells the pc that his or her Item will now be read and reads the LAST RSing Item to the pc. It should RS without TD. If the next to the last Item did RS, one does not read the last RSing Item to the pc but just returns to listing. If the RS is off the last Item seen to RS read the non-RSing Items just before and just after it, always to be sure. The RS could have been noted for the wrong Item. When one has read it to the pc and seen it RS, the auditor says, "That Rook Slams" and watches the pc. The auditor does no other action for a while, says nothing else. To speak or engage in new actions will rip the pc's attention to shreds. This is a critical moment. One watches the pc's face to see if it darkens or lightens. Darkens = wrong Item. Lightens = right Item. (Watch the area below the pc's eyes, the eye pouches.) Pc doesn't know if it's his Item or not = wrong Item. Pc knows it's his Item == Right Item. Pc ARC breaks shortly or gets critical of auditor = wrong Item. Pc happier = right Item. Pc doesn't cognite = wrong Item. Pc cognites = right Item. While pc is cogniting auditor will see the Item continue to RS on the meter. The RS may fade out or narrow as pc cognites. This does not mean wrong Item necessarily. Even if the RS vanishes after a good bit (5 minutes?) (no TD) it is still opposed. (3) is more likely to fade than (1) and (2) RIs. (2) is more likely to fade than (1) RI. (4) fades almost at once. The Item must always be the last RS on the list and must always RS the first few times read without Tiger Drill (providing session rudiments are even vaguely in). If you aren't sure of the RSes while listing, nul for RS only from the one above the next to last Item to the end of list. Don't nul whole list ever. If an added portion has an RS on it there is no need to nul earlier than it either as no earlier RS will exist. However always test next to last RS. If two RSes appear before a list is added to (next to last and last) or if any two Items on a list RS before a list is added to, that list is incomplete and does not have the Item on it. WRONG ITEM SIGNS A wrong Item given to the pc as his Item does the following: 1. Darkens pc's eye shadows and face; 2. Pc immediately has more mass than before pc was told Item; 3. TA tends to stay up and stuck; 4. Pc slightly or greatly ARC breaks; 5. Pc doesn't cognite at all or cognites briefly and stops (and ARC breaks); 6. Pc can't really understand how it is his Item, but sometimes is propitiatively agreeable with no cognitions; 7. Pc can't really see how it fits in package but may say so diffidently. RIGHT ITEM SIGNS A right Item given to the pc as his Item does the following: 1. Lightens pc's eye shadows and face; 2. Pc has no more mass about him than before Item was read to him; 3. TA usually blows down; 4. Pc feels more cheerful; 5. Pc cognites, usually at length; 6. Pc sees just how it is his Item; 7. Pc sees how it fits against other Items in any package. The auditor must check up on all 7 points above as well as the RS, making 8 points in all. If the wrong indicators aren't present and neither are the right ones, list on further. Don't be a niggardly lister. Another hour's listing can save 50 hours case repair. DIRTY NEEDLE Lists that never go clean needle are wrong way to. You never end up a list with a Dirty needle if you run all the TA action out on a right way oppose list. You don't have to have a clean needle anyway on this type of nulling. RS MATCHING The RS you see on the first RI of any package exactly repeats itself in width and speed on each one of the other 3 RIs in a 4 RI package. It is the same RS when listed and when called, also. A package has a characteristic RS. If one of the Items doesn't match the RS, it's wrong. If none of the 4 RSes seen are similar, run don't walk to the nearest Academy and as soon as the pc gets out of the hospital send him to an HGC. The RSes in one package all match exactly when first seen and first called to pc. Of course after a few cognitions RI (3) and RI (4) of the package may lose their RSes, but not for a while and usually only after being listed. An RS is gone when it's listed against. You only have one RS of a package of 4 RIs RSing at any one time. RI (1) RSes until listed. Then RI (2) RSes until listed, etc. RSes that grind out on packaging were wrong Items. You never audit an RI in any way but listing for another RI. Your memory and a note of width are your only tools in matching RSes on a package. USING ARC BREAKS Use any ARC Break to determine that the R2 is wrong. There is no other reason for an ARC break, no matter what the pc says. The R2 is wrong. That's the reason for the ARC break. You use ARC breaks to verify the R2. The pc will not ARC break on right R2 no matter what provocation exists in the auditing. ARC Break always equals Wrong Routine 2. Wrong Item, Item wrong way to in oppose. List Incomplete. These are what cause ARC breaks, not the auditing. Never forget that. Never try to cure an R2 ARC break with Mid Ruds or missed W/Hs. Go back to work on the R2 line-up. Example: "Your Item is 'A Cat'." Pc says ok, soon begins to chop auditor. Correct action, "Your Item is not 'A Cat'. I will examine this." That's the end of the ARC break just like that. Pc doesn't realize the wrong Item is it. He thought it was the auditor. The auditor now looks over his list to see if it's wrong source or wrong way to or incomplete and proceeds accordingly. The Rule is ALWAYS GO BACK FROM AN ARC BREAK. NEVER UNDERTAKE A BRAND NEW ACTION such as changing the universe. New lists do not cure ARC breaks. Only doing the old list right or finding the right Item cures them. This is also the dominant rule in case repair: Find the earliest ARC break and remedy what was being done just before it. Use ARC breaks to guide your R2. Don't ever Q and A with them or try to handle with auditing. Never stop the auditing on one. Just correct the R2 fast. CASE REPAIR In repairing cases all you do is look over earlier reports until you find the session where the goals went sour and correct what was done in that or the immediate earlier session. Very simple. You'll also find the RS if it has vanished off the case. Never start new actions on a case that needs repair. Only repair old ones. It's a screaming auditing goof, a major error to start a new action on such a case. DOPE OFF All dope off and boil off while listing or nulling comes from ordinary garden variety missed withholds. Pull them rapidly and go on. In R2 you only pull missed W/Hs when you can't get pc into session at all or when the pc dopes off. You don't pull missed W/Hs in case on an ARC break - you correct the R2. Pc going into apathy is also an ARC break you know. Also propitiation. NEVER REP AN RS ITEM Never represent an RSing Item. But NEVER. Don't handle or use "RIs" that came from representing an RSing Item. Some were gotten this way in 3GAXX. They're wrong. Abandon them fast. Always test a source you are going to use for a represent list for an RS. If it RSes don't represent it. Don't oppose it either as it's off some incomplete list. Find a non-RSing thing to represent instead. There's another version of this also. A pc asked to extend a list (or seeing the auditor's paper as the auditor lists) will use Items that RS to try to get the RSing Item on the list. This is fatal and will increase the number of RSes on the list and make the pc ill, give him the wrong item and so on. When you see a pc doing this tell him or her, "Just answer the auditing question. Please just answer it. The Item we're looking for probably isn't even related to any RS gotten so far." Make the pc answer the auditing question only. A pc may also seek to package when listing Items, not answer the auditing question. An educated pc knows that RI (4) must match RI (1). Get the pc off it. "Just answer the auditing question." And you'll be out of trouble. Some pcs have listed 40 pages without once answering the auditing question. SELF LISTING Getting the pc to list out of session as in goals is a poor idea in R2. Give the pc an Item wrong way to and he'll wrap himself around a telephone pole out of session. List R2 processes in session only. You would have to nul the whole list if it's listed out of session. Where's the time saved? NEVER STEER ITEMS Some eager beavers have started steering the pc to Items while listing, using the needle flicks. Never do it. You get Items that don't belong and all sorts of things. Just be simple, huh? Routine 2 is as good as you simply audit simply. So relax and start clearing. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 012 Ed. Note: OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES [Ed. The following note is on the bottom of page 239 in TV5 at the end of HCOB 11 Feb 63 "Current Auditing" (included below). It does not appear in the New Tech Volumes since this material is included and is no longer considered confidential by CofS] (R3M and R3N as developments are not included in these volumes. They will be found on courses to which they apply.) ================== 013 HCOB 1 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3, URGENT, ALL CL III AND IV AUDITORS (NTV VII p. 23-27, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 FEBRUARY AD 13 Central Orgs Missions Air Mail Class III & IV Auditors ROUTINE 3 URGENT-URGENT-URGENT ALL CLASS III & IV AUDITORS Communicators: Get this data into the hands of any auditor running goals on pcs, fast. There is a probable bug in the listing of all previous Routine 3 processes. I have been studying this for some time to solve why we are getting too few Clears after the goal is found. And why they are sometimes unclear after their needle frees. The answer comes out of Routine 2-12. Never represent a rock slamming item. A rocket read as on a goal often follows this rule and becomes never represent a rocket reading item. ln all previous R3 we were representing the rocket reading goal in two of the four lines and opposing it backwards in the remaining two. People went Clear on the four, sixteen and other multiple lines but something must have been wrong as others didn't. Therefore abandon at once any listing on any older line series. A goal may be listed only on "Who or what does the goal oppose?" Never on who or what would want or not want the goal as that approximates a represent line to some cases. Do not list anything but goal-oppose. Never list even oppose-goal. I learned all this shaping up Routine 2. ___________ Wrong goals are still dynamite. But this newly developed listing below helps prove a goal out. Goal reliable items rocket read. If a goal won't yield RR reliable items it's probably wrong. In Routine 2, you use rock slams. The bigger the rock slam the better it will go for the pc. In Routine 3 you use rocket reads, never rock slams. Routines 2 and 3 therefore do not mix. While you may encounter and use rocket reads in Routine 2, don't mix goals into it. Goals just naturally emerge in doing Routine 2. When they check out, get the pc run on Routine 3. In Routine 3 you wholly ignore rock slams and use only rocket reads. To fill the gap I have put Routine 3MX together as a theoretical process. ___________ OLD GOALS Use your pc's already-found goal. Prepcheck it back to a rocket read and use Routine 3MX from there on. ___________ ROUTINE 3MX For Experimental Use by Class III and IV Auditors and Z Unit SHSBC INTRODUCTION Routine 3MX is released as experimental. It is however already well worked out and as soon as I find any and all bugs, the X will be dropped. R3MX uses all I've learned about listing items in R2 and applies it to listing out goals. For the moment Z Unit of the SHSBC will use only R3MX, utilizing goals already found on R2MX Method A. ASSESSING FOR GOALS METHOD A Assessment for goals in R3MX Method A is by meter listing and rocket read. After doing R2-12A on the pc and a good prepcheck, particularly on former goals work, one has the pc list goals in session on the meter. One lists the tone arm action out and goes well beyond. If the pc has already listed goals with none found list more on the pc to check for TA action. If it exists list it out. One looks for and notes goals that rocket read. One then takes these rocket reading goals and tiger drills them, preferably the last one that rocket read first as it is the most likely. If pc ARC breaks, the list is probably incomplete according to R2 findings. So complete it. Don't list, in Method A, goals from items or detour. Just go on and on listing goals. Do a Prepcheck on goals every fourth session. The list may go to 2,000 goals. But if it goes so high or beyond, the pc needs more R2-12A. METHOD B R3MX Method B uses the ten lists of 3GAXX but uses any Routine 2 reliable item that still rock slams or one preferably that rocket reads. This method is not covered in this HCOB but will be familiar to Saint Hillers. METHOD C R3MX Method C uses R2-12A until the goal starts pushing up and the pc starts insisting upon it without any prompting from the auditor. One does not grab the goal. The auditor notes it down. If one keeps on doing R2-12A well, the goal will eventually rocket read easily for a checkout. Rock slams on a case indicate a lot of distance down to rocket reads. METHOD D R3MX Method D uses Problems Intensives until the goal appears. This has happened in many cases. GOAL CHECKOUT The goal must rocket read three times in three to be used for listing. If not, do more R2-12A and check the goal out later. LISTING GOALS OUT Goals listing was a more serious hazard in Routine 3 than finding goals. This simplified listing, while as yet theoretical in some respects, should be easier than any earlier listing. It is done like R2-12A but by rocket reads only. LINE ASSESSMENT One takes the goal found, makes sure that it rocket reads well (not rock slams) and assesses as follows: Use the pain-sensation analysis of the goal. If pain (as it should be) one tests: "Who or what would the goal ‘To be a Tiger oppose?' " Or, "Who or what would ‘Being a Tiger oppose?' " (the ‘ing' form of the goal). One or the other question should rocket read. Use that one. We list just this one list on the goal itself and after that use reliable items that rocket read. Using long sheets of paper with the pc's name, date and line question on every sheet, we write down all the items called off by the pc. We mark rock slams and rocket reads as we see them. We list to a still TA and then 50 items at least beyond and 50 items beyond the last rocket read (not a rock slam ever). We don't null the list. We read the next to last rocket read to the pc and then the last rocket read item (and the item just above and below) and see if the tests of 2-12A hold good (cogs, no ARC break, sudden drop of TA, lightening face color, etc.). If so, it's the pc's reliable item. We now begin the "Spiral Staircase." We oppose and oppose and oppose and oppose and oppose always according to whether term or oppterm as long as we can as follows: We determine if the reliable item is a term or oppterm by calling it off to the pc for pain or sensation and then by test listing both-ways-to on the oppose. The wrong way tightens the needle and gives no real TA action. The right way loosens the needle and gives good TA action. Example: We found "Kitten" as the reliable item. We test for pain or sensation on it and find it gave pain. (Term) We list "Who or what would oppose a kitten?" then "Who or what would a kitten oppose?" and, guided by our test (pain) also and a loosening needle and moving TA, we complete the list, "Who or what would a kitten oppose?" We list to a still TA and 50 items or more beyond and 50 past the last rocket read. We give the pc the next to last item that rocket read on listing, then the last rocket read item. We watch for the signs. (If it isn't right we go on listing.) If there are two rocket reads still firing on the list it is incomplete and we must complete it. Thus we find our reliable item. In short we find reliable item after reliable item just exactly as above each time but always by rocket read, not rock slam. This is a "Spiral Staircase" down toward the Rock and Opp Rock. We pay no further heed to the goal until our "Spiral Staircase" folds up on us. No more rocket reads on the lists or bank getting too solid. In brief, when we run out of reliable items, we go back to the goal we were using, we test it, mildly prepcheck it (put the big mid ruds in on it) and try to revive it. If it sparks up, rocket reads again or reads, we do all the above steps, the assessment from the 2 questions, the list, the first reliable item, the "Spiral Staircase" again. If we can't get a peep out of the old goal, and our auditing was good, we just do another Goals Assessment and find a new goal that rocket reads and start all over again. ___________ As soon as I find what mistakes can be made, I'll recodify and we'll have an improved R3-21 and I'll take the X off. ___________ We need Clears as we've never needed them before and we need them now and we therefore need simpler, faster clearing. I've got R2 smoothed out in R2-12A and it's a real doll. Now I'm smoothing out R3-21 using everything learned in watching R2-12 in use, but using rocket reads not rock slams. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 014 HCOPL 8 FEB 63 CURRICULUM CHANGE (OEC Vol 4 p 424, NTV VII p. 28) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 FEBRUARY 1963 Sthil Info Ds of T CURRICULUM CHANGE The following change in auditing for Units will go into effect Monday, 11 Feb. 63. Y UNIT Y Unit will revert to missed withholds and Prepchecking and will complete a Goals Prepcheck. All Y Unit auditing will be meterless, specializing in the observation of the pc, particularly coloration and apparent age. Theory and practical for this unit will specialize on R3MX. Any 2-12A cycle now in progress in Y may be completed by the current class. R2-12A will be struck from all checksheets as fast as replaced by R3MX data. R2-12A will be done in V Unit only. Routine 3MX only will be done in Z Unit. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 015 HCOPL 9 FEB 63 SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS (OEC V4 p 425) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 FEBRUARY 1963 BPI SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS Students attending the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course will hereafter be terminated and returned only when clear. As this action, by current technology, is not a lengthy process, (only very exact), it is not anticipated that the course length forecast of 16-20 weeks will suffer any great change. Current students are being held to complete this desirable goal. New students are some of them even now being cleared in the V unit before actually beginning course. Any retread student is acceptable on course and can be promised now to begin getting clear the first week on course. Retread is forecast as eight weeks where the student has his goal already. The Practical Section has been strengthened to ensure accuracy and fast passage. The Theory Section is being simplified as all materials are being converted rapidly to the exact needs of auditing and clearing. Saint Hill is gearing up for a busy spring and summer. We now have around sixty students and seven supervisors and instructors. Most of these students will have graduated, cleared, in March or April. We have only two "hung up" students who have not been able to pass course requirements over a long period, and these are both of them now being cleared and should be first goal clears by March. Morale level on the course has never been higher. Saint Hill staff is clearing itself on a co-audit basis and all should be first goal clears by mid spring. You may have been waiting for Saint Hill to start producing clears on an everyone basis. This is now successfully in progress amongst students and instructors. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.cden Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ==================