[continued from 05a] 024. HCOB 19 June 1970 C/S Series 7 C/S Q&A HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1970 C/S Series No. 7 C/S Q AND A Just as an auditor Q and A so can a C/S. As you know Q and A is the incorrect 2 way comm action of wandering off the question by feeding the pc what the pc said as a Question, the Answer is taken as the next auditor's Question. Many various outlines of what Q and A is already exist and this is just to refresh the subject. Example: Student Auditor is ordered "2 way comm on cities." by the C/S which is okay. But it can be Q and Aed like this: Student: "Tell me what you think about cities." Pc: "They're cold." Student: "What about cold?" Pc: "I don't like it." Student: "What else don't you like?" Pc: "Well....old men." Student: "What about old men?" Pc: "They're obnoxious." Student: "What else is obnoxious," Pc: "________________" Well you remember all about that. It's maddening and shows no auditor control and certainly doesn't handle the original C/S subject-of "cities". There are three main ways in which a C/S can Q, and A in C/Sing. PC C/S Pc goes to Examiner on own volition end says "I am ill. I need my ruds flown." A C/S Q and A would be "Fly ruds." Pc on his own goes to Examiner and says, "I am upset about my job." C/S writes "L1B on job." You get the idea. The first one is therefore Q and Aing with Exam statement of pc. This is varied by taking a pc's note or letter or report and accepting what the pc says is wrong. "Like I'm PTS to my husband." And then C/Sing "2 way comm on husband." Naturally the ancient law applies here. If the pc knew what it was it would not be wrong and would as-is. Pc coming up to Exam saying "It's my husband!" with F/N Cog VGIs would be what would happen if it was the husband. And that would be great but of no real value to C/S except pc has had a win and not to now use "husband". Give you an actual example: Pc in Solo ruds found she hated George. It F/Ned. Next audited session pc was saying she hated George. HCO B 19.6.70 - 2 - Wrote a note about George. C/S did not notice the outness. Ordered L1B on George and in a 2 way come got little or no TA, continued to he ill. The fact is it wasn't George at all and not even a terminal. Pc had gone up one grade too many, hit an overwhelm, the earlier 6 grades were out! Correct action was to have done a general repair the moment a pc suddenly and mysteriously caved in and got ill on a new level! The pc never should have been going on up grades for the last 6 grades! The tendency to toss it all off with a Q and A not only didn't handle but obscured the real situation. C/Sing A WIN The second Q and A is to C/S a pc win. Pc in 2 way come mentions cats and more cats and cats and finally at the end of session has a big F/N Cog VGIs on cats. The C/S sees all this "cat" mention and orders "Prepcheck cats." That is a very cruel sort of Q and A. Another version of it of course is to see a pc reach a full End Phenomena on a series of processes like an unmistakeable pc volunteered valence shift and keep on going into an inval. Correction is to rehab of course. Yet another version is to pull a w/h and then keep pulling it so the pc doesn't think its gone. Correction is to rehab of course. The TA often goes high or low on these Q and A actions and Inval- Eva1 actions are ordered and the release point rehabbed. The third Q and A a C/S can pull is to agree to the pc's demands for the next grade despite all contrary indicators. "I'm ready for Clear now!" says the pc full of somatics whose R6EW wasn't really done and who can't talk. The Registrar, execs and others push on this also. The D of P and C/S have total authority on this. They should be diplomatic. "He can have the grade of course but I will have to prepare him for it" is the best answer. "Please make arrangements for Clear preparation - 25 hours". If the C/S doesn't hold the fort on this the pc put into the next grade who isn't ready wall fall on his head. If this pressure from the pc (in any version) continues, have him HCO B 19.6.70. - 3 - sign a waiver "I will not hold the org or any principles responsible and waive any refund if I am put on next grade." That either gets home or he says okay and signs. So put him on the grade and hope he doesn't fall on his head - and if he does now demand he get the hours needed to get fixed up so he can really make it. A D of P or C/S often have other pressures exerted on them that are not technical in nature such as economics, ambition, status symbols (of having a high grade regardless of a headache) and have to cope with these diplomatically. But any but tech considerations are dangerous to entertain. SUMMATION Of these 5, 2 are concerned with letting someone else C/S. Like an engineer letting someone else plan the railroad. And the third is also slightly in that nature, consisting of not noticing the pcs wins and using them with which to C/S. CAUTION This doesn't mean the pc is always wrong. He is generally right when he says he's overwhelmed or upset. He's almost always wrong when he says what overwhelmed him or what BPC was out WHEN SIMPLY SAYING IT DOES NOT CORRECT THE CASE OR PRODUCE F/N VGIs. You always use the pc's data one way or another in that you are paralleling what the MIND does. That's reads, Not what the pc says. Remember that what's really wrong lies in the field of mass, energy, space, time, form and location. As these are eased up (by Standard Dianetics and 18 years of Scientology actions and processes) thoughts come to view. So if you Q and A with thoughts already in full view, you never really ease up the bank. That's why Q and A with significance is not done. LRH:nt Copyright ($)1970 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FOUNDER ===================== 025. HCOB 19 June 1970 C/S Series 8 Chart of Human Evaluation HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remlmeo HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1970 ISSUE I C/S series No. 8 CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATION Science of Survival's Chart of Human Evaluation Is a study for C/Ses and is of great use. When you find the pc on one of its columns you can see if the pc stays there or falls back there. Standard Dianetics opened this chart to full use for C/Ses. 18 years of Scientology processes and know how are to a large de- gree evolved from this chart. IF A PC IS STAYING AT A LEVEL OF THE CHART OR FALLS ON IT you know he Is running above his level. Processing Changes Conditions. If it doesn't Improve them (or the pc's behavior) then the pc's Reality is not being reached. It can be plus or minus, above or be- low. It is seldom that the pc's reality is higher than the processes used and really only occurs when a grade honestly run Is rerun. Then you get pc protest as he's made that. Pcs who get sick suddenly are being run far too high on the Class Chart. Pcs who don't change are also being run too high. Behavior, mannerisms are the Index. DO THESE CHANGE? If they do the pc is improving. If they drop lower on the Human Evaluation Chart the pc is in overwhelm. PICKING THOUGHTS OUT OF FORCES IN THE BANK BRING A NO-CHANGE. In other words you can park a pc by continuing nothing but think processes which address only significance. SELF AUDITING Self auditing is the manifestation of being overwhelmed by masses etc. and pulling only think out of the bank. Pulling out think then pulls in more force which gives more self audit. Not all self audit is bad. The pc eventually realizes its forces! After a few tens of thousands of hours! If he knows all the answers. A good push against a wall Is worth a hundred hours of self auditing. And It's force. HUMAN EVALUATION This famous chart (In use by the way by an airline and several other areas, and which had to be printed as desk blotters for per-. sennel people at one time) could easily be expanded in numbers of vertical columns to include all behavior. The C/S is at a disadvantage as he doesn't see pcs. But he can have a mannerism item filled in on a Summary Report. "Mannerisms ________________" "Mannerism changes ____________________" This serves. It also serves to look at the psychosomatic column of the chart and a pc's Health Form. HCO B 19.6.70 Iss II -- 2 -- CHANGING THE PC The pc will change In ideas when he changes his relationship to forces. Tons of processes do this. Objective Processes have to be run in on a pc now and then. Somatics passing through in a session are a definite clue to force change. The no-somatic pc Is either high as an angel or being run too high. You don't have to run directly at force for forces to change in the pc. One 2 way comm I did with a pc released his hold on a huge bundle of forces! The body responds badly to forces. The conflict between protecting or using a body and being as a thetan able to withstand large forces gets so mixed up in a pc he can wind up as a force-shy thetan! STANDARD PROCESSES Standard processes such as those in use for 18 years handle this when fitted into their levels. What the C/S has to realize is that he is (a) producing an optimum rate of change in the pc if he is C/Sing well and (b) chang- ing the pc's position upward on the Chart of Human Evaluation. LRH:nt.mek Copyright ($) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FOUNDER ===================== 026. HCOB 21 June 1970 C/S Series 9 Superficial Actions HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1970 C/S Series No. 9 SUPERFICIAL ACTIONS One of the reasons Scientology tended toward disuse in the late 1960's was not its workability. It was a growing cultural disinclin- ation to do things thoroughly. "Fast, quick results" was interpreted as seconds or minutes. In old psychotherapy as practiced In the 19th Century It required ONE YEAR of weekly consultation ?o see If anything could be done about a case' and FOUR MORE YEARS to produce a meager superficial result. Compared to that two or three hundred hours of processing was nothing. As we began to dominate this field in terms of persons handled and results obtained, psychiatry Invented "Instant psychiatry" by which no result was gotten in no time. SPEED became the primary consideration of the culture. Jet planes, fast cars, "saved time". But an old Chinese, when told by a driver that he had saved 4 minutes in speeding back from town asked "What are you going to do with the 4 minutes?". Time itself Is a basis of aberration. Dropping time out is the consideration of factory managers of production lines as "the faster something can be made the more you have of it." But look at this again. Something can be done so fast it isn't done at all! The dif- ference between a very fine camera and a cheap one is speed of manu-- facture. Cheap cameras don't get their parts carefully machined or matched - they don't fit together -- they break. cease to work. A fine gun can be told by the lack of tool marks on the hidden places. A cheap gun's Inner bolt is a mess of scars. It isn't smooth in operation, It didn't take much time to make but it also jams and freezes up when you tried to use it. Maybe you've heard of "hotter than a 2 dollar pistol". A 2 dollar pistol is "hot" because it's so quickie made if usually blows up and blows off a hand. There is a point where SPEED is simply a cover for a cheap worthless product. Let us take a filthy room. A lazy housekeeper comes in and sweeps a few bits of dust under the carpet, leaves soot all over the windows and garbage on the mantle and says Its clean. Some- body else not afraid of work spends an hour at it and leaves a really clean room. SHORT PGMS A short pc program is economically and efficiently for the birds. In the first place a C/S has to know the extent of his tech well to be able to think up' light processes' in quantity, If one heard a C/S say "But I don't have time to spend an hour doing a long program for the pc" one is listening to something pe- culiar. If one spent an hour or two doing up a real long 20 action program to repair the pc, then for the next 20 C/Ses it takes only a few minutes to look over the session and order The next action on the list. If one had no .program one would have to study ?he folder each time, One actually saves C/S time by doing long programs both to repair and to get the pc back on the Class Chart where he'd gotten to. Further auditing is sold by the hour and it WASTES money and income and pcs to short program them. "Yes, but we sell result! If we can get 200 pcs done in 100 auditing minutes we would make $18,233 clear profit......." HCO B 21.6.70 - 2 - Well the cruel answer to that was when orgs began to do that on lower grades they didn't attain the result on the pc and stats went DOWN! Power was once priced against the fact of 50 to 100 hours of auditing. It retained the price and by cutting out all End Phenomena or real gain it was at last being given in 20 minutes. And after just so many years of this economic dishonesty, SHs crashed! They had sold out the real value of the product for a quick buck. The "field" became "ARC Broken" and few takers came to an SH. It is a very long hard road back. And it is a very costly one. "Quickie Grades" instead of making fortunes for one and all crashed the whole Scientology network. BECAUSE QUICKIE RESULTS ARE LAZY AND DISHONEST. Let's just face up to the facts of life! Selling out the integrity of the subject for a buck wrecks the subject. SUCCESS The real star of an org is Success Stories. Honest grades and time spent in C/Sing and in auditing to obtain them add up to success for the Individual, the org, its field, the country and the planet. The time it takes to process somebody is how long it takes to get each single result available. It is not how slowly or quickly it is done. A book is not a good book if it takes 7 years to write. And a bad book isn't always written in 2 weeks. It takes as long to write a good book as you get a good book. The result is the result and TIME IS JUST AN ENTERED ARBITRARY. A person who overwhelms at Grade IV is an easily overwhelmed person. It might take 50 hours just to repair the case and the person's life. That might be 20 or 30 steps on the program. If the C/S can't dream up 8 or 9 ways to repair past auditing and 15 or 20 ways to repair a life, then It's time to go back and read the Original Thesis: Evolution of a Science, DMSMH, 8-80, 8-8008 and listen to a hundred or so SHSBC tapes. "Yes, but I have no time to _________." Well, that's also say- ing "It can't be done well". But there is time. If anyone looked over his area he would be able to throw out the time wasting actions if it comes to that. "Look. I'm the C/S, the D of P and have to audit 3 _________." That's a statement that the job has already been done so badly that no persons show up to take over the extra hats! And the no-re-- sult programs cripple the economics and that becomes no help. I have seen Mary Sue take over an HGC that had tons of unsolved cases and too few auditors and have watched her solve one case at a time and within 2 weeks have 35 auditors and no backlogs and in six weeks no unsolved cases! She was using the "old", "historical", "back- ground", "we don't use them anymore" processes! So it not only can be done, it is the thing to do. That orgs stats soared. It became solvent. It ran at a high run and was a happy org. SICK PCs When there are sick people on a list one doesn't just "give a Dianetic Assist" and send to a doctor and write them off. HCO B 21.6 70 - 3 - If one knows his tech, there was a reason the person got sick. One also knows a sick person goes into overwhelm easily. One can do a touch assist, a contact assist, two-way comm, ruds on the accident, ruds before the accident, Dianetic Assist, medical treatment, life ruds, HCO B 24 July '69, two way comm on suppression, 3 S&Ds, assessment' for area of illness, Prepcheck on area, ruds on area, hello and okay with the affected area, reach and withdraw from area, two way comm, recall on persons similarly ill - location of the postulate that caused it with itsa earlier itsa, prepcheck on the body or its part, more HCO B 24 July '69, more ruds, assessment of failed purposes, two way comm on the sickness. That's not a program, It's just a helter Skelter list of a lot of things to do. It would not greatly matter what order they were done In but lighter actions should be the earlier. And In a program auditing repair comes before life repair. EXPECTANCY Now if a C/S or an auditor has a magical complex, he expects ONE process to run a person from wog to OT V I and in ONE minute. The missing knowledge is "gradient scales". stairs and ladders have steps and rungs. It takes TIME to climb a tower. The magical complex thinks of processes as Incantations or charms. A person C/Sing would always be trying to find THE process the pc should be run on. The think is that THE process, once dis- covered would take no time at all and the pc would magically be- come well! Pardon me, but that's pure goofiness. And it would set the C/S up for constant FAILURE. One sees such a person scrambling through processes, trying to guess "which one which one which one. Oh there's one! Now we run It for 3 minutes on the pc, Oh dear. it didn't work. He isn't well. Let's see what's here still. Scramble scramble. Oh, here's one. This green paper is probably the right color. Auditor! Run this on the pc. Oh dear, it didn't work. He isn't well yet. So! We will take these 5 major processes and run them all in one session and add six grades. Do that! Do It! It's a desperate sit- uation. Oh dear, the pc blew. Well I guests the subject doesn't work or I'm a failure ...... " That is NOT how one should C/S. If a workman was supposed to cure an ox hide and was told salt would do It and he had a magical complex, what would he de, Well, he might take a small salt shaker and sprinkle the corner of the hide (thinking the right thought) and find that the hide rotted in a few days. He could then conclude salt didn't cure ox hides, If someone kept hammering at him to cure ox hides with salt and he kept sprinkling the corner (knowing It wouldn't work) he'd get a very odd idea about his orders! But who would suspect that this workman thought it was magic! An honest rubbing of salt all over and into the ox hide is the meaning of "salt will cure Ox hides"! But that would take work. It would take TIME! It would have to be honestly and thoroughly done. But one would have Cured ox hides and gotten shoes and a profit and pay and everything for one had a Product. Magical thought in auditing isn't likely to give anyone a product of really able people! SHORT CUTTING PROCESSING Processes can be short cut as well as programs. HCO B 21.6.70 - 4 - Take an early (means basic, useful, useable) version of Rising Scale. There are 18 pairs. Each pair should be run to F/N, cog, VGls. An auditor told to run Rising Scale can run along the 18 pairs until one F/Ns. And leave it. The process has been short cut. And with that short cut went its ability, to restore fertility! So one hears Rising Scale will sometimes restore fertility or change eyesight. Orders it done. It Is done to 1 F/N. No real result occurs. Or take Dianetics. Dianetics can be chopped "to save TIME". First feeble flutter of an F/N, no Cog, no VGIs, auditor barking Did it erase? Did It erase?" Final result, no real gain. There goes the subject. Half an hour to run the chain, no extra 30 seconds for the real F/N, the cog, the VGIs. SO ONE WASTES A RESULT FOR THE SAKE OF SAVED TIME. THE AGE It is a symptom of the age that there Is no time. But in the Data Series PLs one finds that "omitted time" is a basic insanity. That a body lives only about 70 years puts an awful limit on Man. Man's Empires endure at most only about 300 years if that. 70 years is not enough time to make a real career and 300 years is not enough time to even groove in a civil service. Man pays for it with poor lives and rotten governments, But it doesn't take 70 years or 300 years to process a pc. A year maybe up to homo novis, A few years to OT. Even traveling it casually slow. 25 hours to repair someone's life and 50 to 100 hours to get him up to no somatics with Dianetics is pretty satisfactorily fast. What's this take? A week to repair. 2 to 4 weeks for full Dianetics. At 25 hours a week. That's very little. And it's enough to tell him to get trained so he can have all he wants. SPEED LIABILITY When speed is the consideration, not results you get a very cheap camera or car. And you can expect it to fall apart very soon. You also get a cheap reputation. We are in the Leica and Cadillac and Rolls Royce product class without trying. Why settle for "Quickie Grades"? You get no students that way and that's the heavy org income. You get no expanding field. And you won't ever get a cleared planet. We've learned all this the hard way. So let's not let it go unheeded. The place to handle the situation is with C/Sing. And to gain the cooperation of C/Ses to make results real re- sults by insisting that speed is the fast road to poverty in the long run. If the C/S burden is too heavy, start pushing training. Then you'll get help. HCO B 21.6.70 - 5 - Honest C/Sing gives an honest result, It takes as long to correct a case as it takes. It takes as long to make a person well as it takes. It takes as long to get a real lasting grade result as it takes. And that's a lot longer than the time spent on it in the late 60'S. ALL pcs "have to be OT tomorrow". Why let them C/S their case by demanding it only take 2 minutes? Self C/Slng is no more effective than self auditing. Registrars as well as pcs try to grab the C/S hat. "I will sell you a Marital Intensive because you have such a bad cold." And Execs "Run this staff member on money ....... " Well, a C/S's hat is the C/S's. And he should wear it for honest results. And damn others trying to C/S and wreck his job. THERE ARE NO CONSIDERATIONS WHICH FORGIVE ANY RESULT THAT IS NOT THOROUGH AND HONEST FOR EVERY PROGRAM OR GRADE. LRH:dz.mek Copyright ($) 1970 by L, Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FOUNDER ===================== 027. HCOB 24 June 1970 C/S Series 10 Repairing a Repair HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JUNE, 1970 C/S Series No.10 REPAIRING A REPAIR When a pc is on a Repair cycle it is quite horrible to have a bad (goofed) session occur. Why? Well the pc is on a Repair Cycle because he is overwhelmable. A goofed session is more overwhelm. And it was goofed on a process type which was already what you would use for repair. So NOW what do you do? The answer of course is to sort out the real error. If you can't find it readily in the worksheet have the Examiner ask the pc what the auditor did. Then having found the actual goof, you have it repaired by rehab of the BP F/N or an L1B using "Method 3" in assessing the prepared list. The goofs are fortunately few in type. There HAS to have been a basic goof for a Repair session to have gone wrong. So when one goes wrong, you really search the worksheet until you find it and if it isn't visible get the pc asked. These goofs are pretty elementary. The auditor possibly doesn't know that a TA can go DOWN by overwhelming by overrun or way up by overrun. So a usual goof in Repair is overrun of an F/N or an item that F/Ned or a list that F/Ned. Example: In a Repair Pgm a GF is called for. Auditor clears a couple items, suddenly hits a hot one, pc gets F/N, Cog, VGIs. Auditor (told to get all the charge off the GF overlooks senior data - let pc have a win, GFs often raise hob with the TA if run further than THE item) goes on down the GF list past the F/N VGIs hunting for new charge. Pc's TA goes to 1.6! Pc cogs he has a stuck picture. TA 1.6. "End of Sess." Now what do we do. Well, a new factor now enters in. C/S WANDER The pc was on a precise Repair Pgm, is only at VI out of XVIII steps. But the pc is rough. Rough running. Diverges, critical, boggy. And now he is stuck into a goofed session and we have to repair a repair! A C/S at this point can wander. He can Q and A. The WHOLE REPAIR PGM CAN GET DEPARTED FROM AND THE PC REALLY BOGGED. When faced with Repairing a Repair Pgm session watch it! Don't wander! HCO B 24. 6.70 -2- The C/S procedure is this: 1. Find in the W/S or from the pc the exact goof. 2. Repair that goof by rehab, indicating BPC or two way comm, depending on the error. 3. DO NOT ORDER A NEW DIFFERENT NON PGM ACTION. 4. Continue the PGM. It is here a C/S can go adrift. New actions crossing the original program can soon have C/S, pc and Auditor chasing over hill and dale. It is a fatal pursuit. About the only time you change a Repair Pgm once outlined is to extend it or lighten it. But in that case do a whole new Pgm. You will find 2 way comm is lighter than a Prepcheck. Let us say pc was doing great on 2 Way comm. Gets into a Prepcheck session and goes out the bottom. In such a case the Prepcheck is repaired of any goof noted in it and 2 way comm that session - and it comes out all right. If no goof can be located, 2 way comm it and it will be okay. An Auditor can throw a list not ordered into a Repair Pgm by finding the TA high at session start and doing an O/R list and goofing the list. It would already be dicey to list a pc who is on a Repair Pgm. To then goof ordinary laws of listing and nulling can get grim. The first C/S action to repair the repair is of course to get the list corrected with an L4A. You can often spot the listing goof as a C/S. It's usually an O/R of an O/R list or an incomplete list or an "unnecessary list". It's poison to list a pc on a Repair Pgm, however. 2 way Comm it. If a check for Exteriorization reveals it, you have no choice but to do an Interiorization rundown. That's a common reason. But if the pc is already flinching at engrams, limit the Interiorization to 3 way Recall and note it clearly that he's only 3 way Recall of Int. AUDITOR FLUBS Student or new Auditors produce the most flubs. It is therefore good to keep them off repair actions or Repair Pgms. The commonest flubs are failing to trim the meter and ignoring the F/N at "3.1", yet sitting right there running the pc up to 4.0 without ever asking, "Have we by-passed a release point?". Poor TRs, not having, 2 way comm down, neglecting pc origin or chopping comm are probably next in order of frequency. HCOB 24.6.70 - 3 - Remember that pcs who need lots of repair are DELICATE cases. Feather touch is the watchword. They are not all that easy to audit. They can cause Auditors and C/See to disperse. Such pcs are afraid of force and easily get engulfed if pushed hard into the bank. So lightly, lightly. And exact repair of any flub. And get back to the program! Mid program is no time to become inventive. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:sb Copyright ($) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard All Rights Reserved