Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot) Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 37 - EARLY OCT 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS Date: 9 Oct 1998 14:00:11 POST37.txt SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 37 - EARLY OCT 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS Posts to ACT only are in Archive 38 ========================================== Contents: subj : Super Scio - LRH on Martin Luther (was Apostates) subj : Super Scio - SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On anthrax.net subj : Super Scio - The Anonymous Attack subj : Super Scio - Answering Warrior on Fred Schwartz subj : Super Scio - FREEING SCIENTOLOGY subj : Super Scio - Greatest Good On All Dynamics subj : Super Scio - To Veritas On Ingo Swann subj : Super Scio - JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH subj : Super Scio - On Jenna Elfman and Rescues subj : Super Scio - Scientology Equals Bad PR subj : Super Scio Humor - OSINTOLOGY subj : Super Scio - Sci Fi Movie subj : Super Scio Tech - EXPANDED CC PLATEN ========================================== subj : Super Scio - LRH on Martin Luther (was Apostates) LRH ON MARTIN LUTHER (was Apostates) On 23 Sep 98, smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel) posted on subject "Apostates" > On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 03:05:12 GMT, publicrelations@scientology.org > (Public Relations) wrote: > > > RE: APOSTATES > > > > Religious scholars have routinely found the testimony > > and public statements of apostates to be unreliable. In his > > book "The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of > > Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movement", > > professor David Bromley, Department of Sociology and > > Anthropology of Virginia Commonwealth University, explained > > how individuals who elect to leave a chosen faith must then > > become critical of their religion in order to justify their > > departure. This then opens the door to being recruited and > > used by organizations which seek to use their testimony as a > > weapon against a minority religion: > > How does scientology feel about Martin Luther and the whole > reformation? According to the statement above you are opposed to > protestants generally because they were appostates. I do suppose you > are opposed to Christianity also, seeing as they split off from the > Jews. Maybe there is a quote from Hubbard to reflect this attitude. > Ah, here it is: > > "The man on the cross, there was no Christ" > > Ahh, there is more consistency here than I thought! > > Thanks for telling us again. > > -Neal H. Boy, that CofS Apostates remark is really dumb, and the org has been using that line for awhile now. And they are actually using a Sociologist as an authority. Seems like they have gone totally into the valence of the psychs which they oppose. The clams (by which I mean blind fanatics who keep their shells closed) don't actually study LRH for fear of getting M/Us, or else they would know what Ron really said about Martin Luther. This is from lecture 18 of the 16th ACC (available on cassette as "The Anatomy of Cause") given on 28 Jan 1957 and titled "Auditing Techniques: Simulous-Response". # What was an heretic? It was somebody who THOUGHT for himself. # They said it was somebody who departed from the status quo. # No, that's not true. It was an individual who thought for # himself." # # If the tenets which were being taught had been true, then # an original, independent thinker would have achieved the # same tenets. They would have created these things, they # would have looked them all over, and in this new creation # there would have been room for the old creation." # # So only the host of lies need fear individual adventure into # the field of original thought." # # The revolt which took place around Martin Luther, and so # on, is quite interesting. You wouldn't think that one # innocent little book penned out - not even very well # penned out - would cause such a fantastic reaction within # the citadels of the church itself. But there is where it # caused its major reaction. It caused a reaction there long # before it caused a reaction anywhere else. Wow! He # energized all of the mechanisms and automaticities and # engrams inside the church, and they kicked back. And # it was the CHURCH which caused the debacle which followed, # NOT Martin Luther, according to any casual view. You # see? The church went around and did all sorts of wild # things ..." I see a parallel here, and if I were CofS Int Management, I would be quiverring in my boots right now. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE Did everybody miss this? I would think that the critics would be jumping all over it. FZ Bible posted a transcript of the HPC lectures and they noted what had been edited out in R&D Vol. 9. This consisted of two tapes posted in a total of 4 parts. The part of interested to critics is part 2 of 4. The message header was - FZ BIBLE 2/4 HPC TAPES 1952 (Fdn Business & HofM Incidents) It was still on dejanews the last time I looked (but hurry, their posts turn into "article unavailable" very quickly). First let me repost the segment that knocked me on my ass. ------------ (begining of excerpt from FZ Bible transcript of tape HPC-1 REVIEW OF PROGRESS OF DIANETICS AND DIANETIC BUSINESS given on 25 FEB 1952 - they marked the part that was left out of R&D 9 with ">") My first effort at this was in Palm Springs. I went down to Palm Springs, I got a modest little house down on the edge of the desert and I sat down there and I figured out and wrote down the chart notes on the Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation. I severed connections actually actively with the Foundations and, using some royalty money and so forth, worked out the chart you find in Science of Survival. Then a great many sorrowful things happened to me in a rapid-fire order. I had neglected everything everywhere, practically - a lot of unfortunate incidents of one sort or another. > The lady who was my wife went and got all tangled up with > communists. It was wonderful. My back was ... my back > was turned, I could do nothing to help her, I tried to > help her, I couldn't. Bang. You've probably seen the > results in the newspapers. I finally - to get some peace and quiet, I went down to Cuba. And I sat down in Cuba with a transcriber - I mean a, pardon me, a recording Sound Scriber - and I dictated in a space of three weeks the book Science of Survival, which brought up the techniques and gave the evaluation of human behavior and so on, and then came back up here to Wichita. (end of excerpt) ---------------- I had heard this years ago, but it was well before getting on the net so I didn't pay much attention and probably assumed that he was talking about his first wife, who is known of by Scientologists (as Nib's mother and as some sort of a bad character who was hostile to Dianetics). Since then I have read Barefaced Messiah and I know about the controversy concerning his second wife, Sarah, who he later claims he was not married to (and he denied fathering Alexis). Since fraudulent marriage and paternity suits are common with famous people, I read the Barefaced Messiah account with some doubt and I've avoided any discussion of Sarah and her daughter Alexis. But here we have it in Ron's own words. "The lady who was my wife went and got all tangled up with communists ..." And the time period he is referring to on this 1952 tape is indeed the well documented 1951 visit to Palm Springs when he was writing "Science of Survival". There is no way that he could have been talking about his first wife, Polly. According to Chapter 8 of Barefaced Messiah (page 134 of the 1987 American hardcover edition), Polly filed for divorce in 1947. I would assume that this is well documented. That means that he must be referring to Sarah as his wife. And his story fits with the events described in Barefaced Messiah chapter 10 "Commies, Kidnaps and Chaos". If the CofS hadn't edited this out of the transcript, it would never have been noticed. But thanks to FZB, it has now come to light. And let me confirm their transcript. The first thing that I did was get out the old reel and check it and they are correct, its on the reel and not in the R&D, and the same goes for the other things about Don Purcell and so forth that were edited out of this lecture. As I've said before, Hubbard might exaggerate or downplay things in the 1950s lectures to his students but he doesn't lie to them. You wouldn't find a course tape where he denies that Sarah was his wife just like you wouldn't find one where he claims to be a nuclear physicist or says that he got good grades in school. Instead you find just the opposite. Even back in 1968 I always thought that the stuff the org was putting out about Ron was somekind of PR bullshit because it didn't match what I was hearing on the old tapes. Now it seems that CofS has to edit those tapes extensively because he confesses much too much on them which is contrary to the PR and bullshit and so forth which CofS is comitted to. Note that FZBA did make a goof on the second tape ("Abberative Incidents") that was in part 3 of their posting. They marked the beginning of that lecture as having been omitted in the R&D and it was not omitted. I suspect that they simply missed the first page (a short one because of the lecture heading) while they were scanning these in. They transcribed it accurately (apparently directly from the reel) so the only thing that is wrong is that they mislabled it. And the lecture does have other things (correctly labled by FZBA) that were left out of the R&D. And let me take this opportunity to encourage them to keep posting these. I think that getting all the tech out on the net is very very important. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On anthrax.net TO TILMAN ON ANTHRAX.NET On 29 Sep 98, tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) answered on subject "www.anthrax.net ?" > In <36100AF4.61A5@virgin.net>, Roland > wrote: > > >http://www.anthrax.net no longer in operation? > > No, it shut down because of threats from the 'ho. But all information > from there is available elsewhere. I hope that this is true, but as far as I know this was the only website that was carrying the PDC transcripts and the FZ Bible posts (and Zenon's LRH book postings too). They were quite brave in keeping these online and I was surprised that they managed to keep doing it for many months before the org succeeded in taking them down. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - The Anonymous Attack THE ANONYMOUS ATTACK Here is another example of Black or reverse Scientology being used to do harm - On 21 Sept 98 - Anonymous wrote: > He alters to > unrecognizable the data of Scientology and attacks anyone who > presents any serious opposition to the harm that altering the > data of Scientology counseling produces. That is anyone who > opposes his efforts. He alters - he lies. The Pilot / Free Zone = > ENEMY! Notice the intentional vagueness to the accusations. No specifics about what is supposedly being lied about, just an entheta generatlity. There is an entire policy letter about these "entheta generalities" being a suppressive characteristic and explaining how somebody might go PTS to them. So the OSA shill performs a known suppressive action on purpose so as to drive me PTS (Ha! Not likely!). If he could think for himself, he would realize that the overt motivator sequence guarantees that this will become a footbullet. So lets see what Ron says about the harm that I might be producing. This is from lecture 20 of the 16th ACC, "Auditing Techniques: Workable and Unworkable" given on 30 Jan 57, available as part of the "Anatomy of Cause" cassettes. # Bad auditing is better than no auditing. # # Horribly enough, there is only one direction for the data # of Dianetics and Scientology, in being fed to anybody with # any kind of communication at all, and that's up. We've # taken units and we've done nothing but instruct them, # we've done nothing but feed them data, done nothing but # give them lectures, and had them all improve. That's an # oddity, isn't it? Because the data they were being given # would make strong men blanch and strong women take to # whiskey. Tell them all about thought control on the # whole track, you know? ... Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Answering Warrior on Fred Schwartz ANSWERING WARRIOR ON FRED SCHWARTZ On 5 Oct 98, Warrior asked on subject "APAC" > Posted for a friend with no internet access: > > Has anyone ever heard of a business named APAC? And if it's a Scientology- > related business? It was founded by a guy named Fred Schwartz and their > logo is similiar to the green Dianetics triangle symbol. They handle incoming > calls for companies that advertise their products on tv and have the consumer > order over the phone. > > Please email any info on this to warrior@entheta.net > > Warrior > See http://www.entheta.net/entheta/1stpersn/warrior/ It might only be a coincidence (the name is not uncommon), but Fred and Gretchen Schwartz have been the Flag Liasons at AOLA for decades. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - FREEING SCIENTOLOGY FREEING SCIENTOLOGY 1. WHY WE, AS SCIENTOLOGISTS, NEED TO HANDLE THE COFS I just searched Dejanews for recent FZ Bible posts and noticed how many Lazarus Cancel reports came up in the search. OSA's Cancel Bunny is really going after these guys. FZ Bible posts hardcore tech, LRH tape transcripts that any Scientologist would be happy to see spread around. At a minimum I would expect that even a loyalist would turn a blind eye towards the copyright violation, maybe saying that its not nice to do that but leaving it alone because it is, after all, spreading real LRH tech. But the CofS wouldn't do that. Instead they attack and work to crush tech out of existance. It actually surprised me. Their other attacks make sense in a sick sort of way. After all, they can rationalize that I am a revolutionary or see me as a squirrel and they see the critics as enemies and they have policies about keeping the confidiential data hidden. But Freezone Bible? All they do is put LRH tech out where people can get it. The org actually gets members to donate money to put Scientology books in the Libraries where people can borrow them without having to pay for them. That is supposedly done to spread the tech. Isn't FZBA doing the same thing, at no cost to the CofS? Except of course for the possiblity of lost income. Even if the org puts a copy of a book in the library, they con a member into paying for it first. So maybe it does make sense in a sick sort of way. But the viewpoint necessary to operate that way is abhorrent to me. The message that I get from this is that it doesn't matter how good and honest an effort somebody makes, if it has anything whatsoever to do with Scientology they will go after it and work to destroy it. They are sinking under the weight of their overts, but their death throes are dangerous. So we can't just ignore it. 2. TAKING POSITIVE ACTION Well of course many of us have been doing that for quite some time now. But I wanted to suggest yet another action that might help speed up the process of freeing the subject. As I have said before, most of the Scientologists are sitting on the sidelines, parked on the bridge, in that horrible halfway state of not being able to either go in or leave. This is especially true of Los Angeles. There are probably about half a million Scientologists there on the sidelines (probably half of the worldwide population of Scientology fence sitters). You actually can't walk down the street without falling over one. If I go into a place that has a dozen programmers to do a computer contract, one of them will be a Scientologist. If I go into a large resturant, there will be a Scientologist. I moved into a new neighborhood, and a pair of old friends (Scientologists) that I hadn't seen in a decade were living three blocks away. In the professions that most often attract Scientologists (sales, computers, and teaching), the percentage in LA may be as high as five or ten percent. Almost none of these, of course, are active Scientologists. If you want to find those, you have to go to the complex or the Manor. Most of them are not yet in the freezone. They will talk about how they are postulating that they will win the lottery or something like that so that they can get back on lines. And then they will tell you some heart rendering story of their last actual attempt to do any services. We need to reach these people. They need to know that there is an alternative. They need to know that there is a freezone and that materials are available on the net. And the idea is theta and aligns with their purpose, so that it will spread, and when enough people begin spreading it, it will take off like a chain reaction and permeate the orgs. So I think that we should have some simple thing that can be spread around where people will see it to the point where they will open their eyes and really take a look. It has to be short and simple and attention getting without at the same time being threatening and it has to lead to more information. So I thought of - ================= FREE SCIENTOLOGY WWW.FZA.ORG ================= That is short and simple enough to make stickers and put them everywhere. And Paul's website has links to everything else and it's very easy to remember the URL. I'm suggesting putting the WWW prefix even though it isn't necessary (Paul has smartly made it optional) because it clues people in on it being an internet address without any explanation. You can print these off on standard mailing lables with normal mailing list software and then just stick the things on lamposts in places where there are high concentrations of Scientologists. It's easy if you already have a Laser printer. And paper with gummed lables for doing this is easy to get at stationary stores. And it's fun to stick lables on things. Strike a blow for freedom today. Affinity, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Greatest Good On All Dynamics GREATEST GOOD ON ALL DYNAMICS I was thinking about the concept of greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics. The org uses this all the time to push errant members back into line. The idea is that you shouldn't be selfish but should work towards the greater good and that the greatest good for the planet is CofS expansion. But there is a flaw in the logic even if you take the concept as correct and believe that the spread of Scientology is the ultimate solution to the ills of mankind. The flaw is in equating the organization (CofS) with the spread of the ideas. It is a confusion of the 4th dynamic with a particular occurance of a 3rd dynamic. Ron has said that Buddah changed the face of Asia with the spread of a single idea, and he is right. That effect was not dependent upon the survival or profit margin of some particular Buddist Temple in India. And Christ could be said to have changed the world with his concepts of "Love thy neighbor" and "Do unto others". And those concepts do not depend on the survival of the Catholic Church. In fact, if we look closely, the bad things that came out of Christianity (Crusades, Persecution, Witch Burning, Holy Wars) all came from organized bodies and do not actually stem from Christ's teachings. As Ron has said, the greatest good for the duck is not the same as the greatest good for the duck hunter. The greatest good for mankind is the free spread of truth rather than the profit margins of some organization. Now I personally believe that the tech is valuable spritual truth. I think that it is important for mankind to have it. So the stat would be spreading the tech and making it easily available. Who has the highest stats? No, its not me, although I would say that I'm one of the runners up (as are many others). The biggest all time dissemination of Scientology materials was done by Zenon Parnarsus. Over 25 Megabytes of LRH material (in simple text format, not graphics). For this the CofS sued him. How much tech has the CofS put out on the net? Almost none. One LRH tape. Lots of bullshit PR and success stories, but no tech. Their idea of "spreading" the tech is to lock it away in vaults and crush anybody who tries to use it. So if you believe that the spread of LRH tech is important to the 4th dynamic, then you should look at who is actually doing that and who is suppressing it. Supporting the CofS is not good for the 4th dynamic and it is not good for the 8th (Scientology as a religion) either. It is only good for supporting the current CofS managment in their backwards mishandling of the subject. If you consider the average CofS staff member, their first dynamic is continually sacrificed for the sake of the org. If you look at how many families have been broken up by disconnection and if you are familiar with the treatement of Sea Org children, you will see that the org is hostile to the 2nd dynamic. Of course people on the sidelines don't feel these things too much (non-staff do well in applying Scientology tech by communicating better with their children, etc.), but if you move in close to the organization, these things hit you right between the eyes. Sea Org members don't tend to have very much MEST or pets either. And the arguments about the 4th dynamic that were presented above apply equally well to the 7th and 8th. So we have a group which, when somebody moves in close to it, acts suppressivly towards all other dynamics. Maybe its not that the 3rd is in opposition to all the others. Maybe its just that one particular 3rd dynamic organization is on a reverse vector. Maybe you could have a 3rd dynamic that is in harmony with the other 7. So what really is the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics? Especially if you believe in the importance of the tech as I do. Think about it. Yours in Freedom, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - To Veritas On Ingo Swann TO VERITAS ON INGO SWANN On 22 Sep 98, Veritas posted on subject "CST and the CIA" > Dear All, > > We've just put a new page up on our site, and I thought I ought to write > and let you know. > > It's called "CST and the CIA." You can find it at: > > http://www.clever.net/webwerks/veritas/cst/cst-cia.htm > > I trust some of you will find it of interest. > > And, for those conspiracy-haters out there in ARS-land, if you didn't > like us before, you'll probably *really* despise us now. :-) > > > Sincerely, > Marie > Associate Editor, Veritas Thank you for highlighting the CIA - Scientology - Remote Viewing connection. This is definitely worth exploring further. But you are also jumping to conclusions. Ingo Swann worked as a TRANSLATOR for the United Nations back in the 1960s when he got involved with Scientology at the New York Org. As far as I can see, it was simply a good way for someone with his broad but non-standard range of talents to make some money. As to having secret clearance, that is common. I have friends who have that simply because they needed it to do some areospace programming contract. I believe Ingo when he says that he didn't know the CIA was behind the remote viewing project and that he wouldn't have joined it if he'd known. Although the appearance of "anchor points" and "dimension points" in CIA remote viewing procedures is obviously from Hubbard, there is nothing mysterious or surprising in this. It was obviously picked up from Ingo who uses these things, having gotten them from Ron's "Creation of Human Ability" and old OT 5 and 6. I would consider that the entire CIA manual is based on Ingo's extensions to LRH tech. And of course now that CIA has let go of it and Ed Dannes is trying to sell it as a course, he is going to hide any Scientology connection both for fear of CofS lawsuits and to avoid negative PR. But there is something here, especially as to how avid the CIA was to use Scientology tech. Can you pry out anything earlier? Let's say from the 1960s? The CIA rumors in Scientology were running rampant back then. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH Since I publicly criticised Jesse's first undignified rant, let me go on record as saying that his subsequent postings have been excellent. The recent post entitled "No Conscience, No Church" is a case in point, giving what I believe to be accurate insider information on what was going on in CofS management in the 1980s. I hope that one of the critics is collecting these at a web site since they are invaluable in helping us to understand what happened during and after DM's coup. We need more like this. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - On Jenna Elfman and Rescues ON JENNA ELFMAN AND RESCUES On 2 OCT 98, Xenubat@primenet.com (Bat Child (Sue M.)) posted on subject "Jenna Elfman uses Tone 40 command to break up fight" > From the "Globe" magazine, 10/13/98: > > =============================== > JENNA ELFMAN TO THE RESCUE IN REAL-LIFE ROAD RAGE HORROR > > She plays a ditzy hippie on "Dharma & Greg". But in real life, quick > thinking Jenna Elfman stopped two brawling drivers from braining each > other with their steering wheel clubs! > > Jenna was pulling off an L.A. freeway recently when she spotted the > potentially dangerous case of road rage. > > "I'm at the red light and there's a convertible in front of me with > two big dogs, but no driver," says Jenna, 27. > > "In the next lane over, there was a Honda with no driver." > > Then Jenna spotted the two men swinging their steering wheel club > locks at each other. > > "I dialed 911, but I knew it would take cops three million years to > get here," she recalls. > > "I rolled my window down and yelled: 'I'm calling the police.' > > "The two guys looked up and I said: 'You, get in your car and take > responsibility for your dogs. > > "'You, get in your car. Both of you take responsibility for your > actions.'" > > It worked! The two guys drove away without a scratch, thanks to > Jenna. > > ============================================= > > Sue, SP4(:), listed on the Scieno Sitter list 5 times! > -- > http://www.primenet.com/~xenubat > > "It will take a *long* time to find another enemy > with the combination of evil and incompetence > you see in Scientology."--Keith Henson A nice story. This is typical of new Scientologists. Somebody does a TRs course (communications course) and is more willing to face something that is happening and do something about it, and in the first flush of enthusiasm at making the world a better place, they are more likely to be responsible and act in a slightly dangerous situation. This is one of the most dramatic gains, you get a concerned and active citizen instead of somebody who doesn't want to get involved. The stories of begining course graduates tackling purse snatchers or seeing a mugging from their window and throwing something at the mugger are endless. But note that this doesn't involve any OT abilities or case handling, just an increased social consciousness and ability to face up to things. Eventually what happens is that the person gets just as enthusiastic and responsible about things that are wrong in the org. And they try and fix things. And they come into conflict with policy. And the org doesn't like that. So the new person gets handled. And they loose this glow and will to act and begin to restrain themselves again. Jenna is much too free and enthusiastic for the control freeks. Eventually she will end up at cross purposes with Command Intention. Then she will either be pushed out into the Freezone or put back in the box and become one of the robots. It is still refreshing to see somebody who is still in that first burst of enthusiasm and hasn't yet been handled. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Scientology Equals Bad PR SCIENTOLOGY EQUALS BAD PR On 30 Sep 98, ralph@hilton.org (Ralph Hilton) responded to Sarah's post on subject "(fwd) Re - Who goes there" > On Thu, 17 Sep 98 20:06:57 PDT, "Sarah Hefver" wrote: > > >For my part,we have lost a number of public who were fascinated by the > >Self-clearing book...right up until they hit the word 'Scientology'. > > > >Some were recovered,others,despite a real initial interest,were not. > > Good test for thetans who might be worth working with. > > If people can't confront a word and some bad PR in their search for knowledge > then I'm happy to let them go off and read "Teachings from the Pleiadians". > > -- > > Ralph Hilton > http://Ralph.Hilton.org Although Ralph is correct, it is still sad that the CofS has behaved so badly that the word "Scientology" actually has a negative connotation. I can't leave out all mention of Scientology in the self clearing book because it would deny and obscure the research line that I'm building on and be a betrayal. But it is still a shame. A real demonstration of reverse vectors. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio Humor - OSINTOLOGY HUMOR: OSINTOLOGY It's time that OSA came out of the closet and stopped pretending to be Scientologists. Obviously they do not believe that people should think for themselves, they do not believe that any auditing is better than no auditing, and they do not believe in spreading the tech. Ideas like total freedom and disagreeing with authority must feel like heavy boat anchors to them, continually dragging them back from their real goals of total control and compulsive agreement. So let us give them A RELIGION OF THEIR OWN. Maybe then they'd leave the real Scientologists alone and stop perverting the subject. I hereby dub their religion as OSINTOLOGY, the science of knowing how to dead agent. Some nifty slogans - When all else fails, try making more money. Any suing is better than no suing. When in doubt, shoot. The way out is through the RPF. ---- Some axioms of OSINTOLOGY - Axiom 1: Life is basically static. Like static on the radio, it is an undesirable addative and interferes with OSA operations. So dispose of it quietly and without sorrow. Axiom 2: Communication consists of talking people into giving you money. Axiom 3: The conditions of existance are four fold: a) ASS-ISNESS: This is the condition of licking DM's ass. This is the ultimate state. b) NOTS-ISNESS: This is the condition of paying endlessly for NOTS. It is almost as desirable as ASS-ISNESS. c) ALTER-ISNES: This is the condition of worshipping at the Alter of LRH and shouting Hip Hip Horray. It is not as desirable as ASS-ISNESS or NOTS-ISNESS, but is acceptible as a gradient that leads towards them. d) WOG-ISNESS: This includes everything else and is handled with the action of fair gameing. ----- THE FACTORS of OSINTOLOGY a) Before the beginning was the cause, and the total purpose of the cause was TO MAKE MONEY. b) In the beginning, now and forever, is the decision, and THE DECISION IS TO MAKE MONEY. c) And then there was a great dividing of the life units into THETOSANS who make the money and PUBLICS who pay the money. d) But the forces of darkness and evil brought forth the SPs who lead the PUBLICS astray from paying their money and drove the stats down. e) Until the coming of the Holy Hubbard who showed the THETOSANS how to dead agent the SPs and restore the universe to its native state. ------ THE OSINTOLOGIST'S CODE 1. Always evaluate for a Public. 2. Always dead agent any public who invalidates you. 3. Never fail to get angry at a public who is not paying in all its money. 4. Never let your staff and students get enought food and rest because it makes them harder to control. 5. Always record withholds revealed in session and publish them as needed to protect the organization. 6. Always push buttons on people to control them. Remember, the reactive mind is your friend! ------ THE OSINTOLOGICAL DYNAMICS There are 8 dynamic urges towards survival in the osintological universe - they are: 1) Survival through making money 2) Survival through avoiding sex 3) Survival through getting the stats up 4) Survival through dead agenting 5) Survival through disconnection 6) Survival through suppressing tech 7) Survival through not thinking 8) Survival through lawsuits ------ NEW OSINTOLOGY TECHNICAL RELEASE The Golden Age of Dead Agenting! Learn how to achieve success and advancement in corporate America by using the third party law to utterly ruin anybody who is more able and might get the promotion that you want for yourself. ------- You guys at OSA might as well face up to it, OSINTOLOGY is the road to total control and will eventually lead to using the tech to implant others. That's the real reason for needing to keep the platens secret. Oops, I guess that I just as-ised so much BS that I found myself staring at the hardcore truth. So back to the humor. ------- How many OSINTOLOGISTS does it take to change a lightbulb? 31 - 10 to investigate the lightbulb manufacturer 10 to third party the lightbulb manufacturer 10 to sue the lightbulb manufacturer 1 to explain to DM why there is no light in the bathroom. ------- T-Rex considered everything fair game and look where it got him. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Sci Fi Movie SCI FI MOVIE This might be a bit off topic. Or maybe not. Because this movie is one of the all time best illistrations of the concept that an idea alone can change civilization. I'm refering to the recent sci fi movie titled "The Postman" staring Kevin Costner and based on the classic novel by David Brin. It didn't do well at the box office, which only shows the usual shallowness of the American public. It might well be the best screen adaptation of a complex novel since "Gone With The Wind". Usually anything longer than a short story is destroyed by Hollywood. But it was mature sci fi and might have been a disappointment to people who were expecting a simple pulp stlye plot such as that used in "Waterworld". And it was based on ideas rather than special effects, so it was probably disappointing to those who went to see it for the purpose of watching things blow up real good. Set in a post hollicost world like that of "Road Warrior", the story is about a con man who foists himself off as a representative (a Postman) of a govemenment that no longer exists. The people want the idea so badly that they make it real. For those of us who believe in the tech, the potential parallel to Hubbard is really frightning. Think about that one while you watch it. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio Tech - EXPANDED CC PLATEN EXPANDED CC PLATEN One of the biggest outpoints with the old clearing course platen is that one does not get good ITSA on running it. My personal experience was that I did get Itsa on the OT 2 platens, spotting occasional locks and seeing how I'd dramatized them occasionally on the track. But this was not true when I ran the CC (which was on old OT 4, so it was after doing OT 2). A lot of it just FNed (as did much of OT 2), but some items read spectacularly, the TA action was quite good, and I felt a good bit of weight lift. So the CC platen ran well, except for the fact that there wasn't any Itsa worth a damn. I don't think that it was me. The items just didn't seem to relate properly to life. And yet there were reads and charge did come off. In fact there was one spectacular read, a gigantic theta bop between 1.5 and 3.5 on the TA with tiny theta bops at each end which would repeate exactly 3 times and then FN at 2.5 each time the item or its opterm was called. It ran like clockwork, so the items had to be right. But no Itsa. What little I know about the incident now is from running earlier track (see Cosmic History in Super Scio) rather than from running the platen. The most likely reason would be that the items were right but the platen was incomplete. My experience with researching actual GPMs (Super Scio chapter 3) was that you can get items reading well and rocket reading and going to big FNs and then take another pass over the platen and find that you had missing item pairs in between. In other words, skipped items do not create the same degree of trouble as getting an item incorrect (mis-worded, half right, etc.). I previously did some work on trying to expand the first section of the CC platen (part A - "The Sevens"). That can be found in post26 in the pilot archives at fza.org. This time I had a major cognition on the structure of the confusion GPM which is part C of the clearing course (note that part B - "The Basic Endwords" is simply a list of the endwords used in the confusion GPM - I assume that that was simply run to get charge off of the endwords first before tackling the GPM itself). The confusion GPM as given on the CC has 2 items per endword, and when I revisited it, I found 6. And with that I also found more endwords (36 instead of 21 all together) and it read nicely on the meter and my Itsa line finally opened up on how these items are dramatized in life. It's still just a big old implant, but it produces good TA and with the expanded platen (below), it runs easily. -------------- Before I present the revised platen, I thought that it might be helpful to explain how I came to it. I was skimming through the 16th ACC transcripts looking for quotes to use on a "Ron the Freezoner" web page that I'm trying to put together and I came upon the following nifty quote in lecture 20 "Auditing Techniques: Workable and Unworkable" of 30 JAN 57. > "Horribly enough, there is only one direction for the data > of Dianetics and Scientology, in being fed to anybody with > any kind of communication at all, and that's up. We've > taken units and we've done nothing but instruct them, > we've done nothing but feed them data, done nothing but > give them lectures, and had them all improve. That's an > oddity, isn't it? Because the data they were being given > would make strong men blanch and strong women take to > whiskey. Tell them all about thought control on the > whole track, you know? ..." This, combined with all the quotes I already know about how dangerous it would be to make the tech confidential got me wondering yet again about why the CC was made confidential. In keeping the platen secret, there is the danger that it will be used against people. And in publishing it broadly, the worst that would happen would probably be that a few people got a little keyed in for a few days and then felt a lot better. In fact, I think that if you published a correct platen in Reader's Digest, you would probably lighten the entire planetary case even if you got a little bit of sarcasm and riddicule in response. So why not do just that to safeguard people from having this used against them? It must be that this platen does not indicate to people as being correct. And the very title ("the confusion GPM") makes me think that even Ron found it confusing. And it must be confusing because there are items missing even though it is one of the best reading platens known. So I tried to spot what was missing and why the platen didn't make sense. The entire confusion GPM just uses Create and Destroy. That may be a heritage from looking at things as simple opterms during the research of 1963-4. And I remembered John Alexander's comment about how Jack Horner was looking at a pattern of 3, and I remembered that the cycle of action is Create - SURVIVE - Distroy. And then I remembered an old tape (I think it was from the HPCA series of 1956) where Ron had just cognited on the real cycle of action being Create-Create-Create and speculated that the Create-Survive-Destroy cycle was not only an abberation but quite possibly had been implanted. So I thought of it being a cycle of all 3 rather than just create and destroy. And since the items are in the form "creating to destroy" and "destroying to create", I simply added "creating to survive", "suviving to create", "destroying to survive", and finally "suviving to destroy". I wrote all six down with the first endword which is "The Now" (or "the present") and immediately because dizzy in a funny sort of way. So I dug out my meter and found that all of them gave nice small falls (despite having FNed the two old ones when I did the CC platen long ago). I then began meter assessing for the correct order to place the 6 items in. When I got the sequence given below, it read as correct and the dizzyness turned off instantly. Next I took that first set of six (on the endword "NOW") and began flattening the reads by repetative spotting of the items (see Self Clearing chapter 34 for how to flatten an implant platen). With that I suddenly started cogniting on all these locks in the form of "Creating an X to survive the now of a Y", such as "creating a good tooth to survive the now of a bad tooth" (or to survive a bad tooth in the present). And I could see this compulsive creation coming about out of an effort to survive some unpleasantness. But of course one then fails at creation (because it doesn't really handle the unpleasantness one is non confronting) and thereby slips into the next item, which is to "surviving to create". In other words, having become obsessed with creating, one now has to survive in order to continue creating. But when that fails, you begin destroying in order to continue to survive, and so on. And I could see this in the context of a being early on the track getting suckered into compulsively mocking things up in terms of survival and destruction. This high level of Itsa validated the pattern for me. The items as given by Ron, were - Pair One: CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW And the expanded pattern I found is - Set One: CREATING TO SURVIVE THE NOW SURVIVING TO CREATE THE NOW DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE NOW SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE NOW DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW This is obviously an early implant that lays in the Create - Survive - Destroy cycle. My thought now is that the original platen was unpleasant to read and a bit restimulative because it restimulated the missing items. In other words it wasn't the kick of the items you were reading but the kick of the items that were not there. With careful solo, you could then flatten the items anyway (if the 2 known ones were discharged, then they would stop restimulating the missed ones), but you couldn't just casually skim over it because of the omissions. Hence it would not have been optimum to publish the original platen in Reader's Digest. After this I started flattening the rest of the implant and I found more endwords in between the ones given on Ron's platen. The expanded list of endwords is as follows. I kept Ron's numbering and identified the ones I found by adding letters so that you can see which ones are from the original platen. Note that in a couple of cases I tried to reword or alter the sequence of the original ones and that doesn't work, the originals really are correct, its just that there are some inbetween that were missed. However I did find that a few of the endwords reacted better without including the "THE". I suspect that the use of "THE" is a matter of translation and what communicates best. Ron's version always has "THE" in the endword. Also, the original CC has that business of spotting "The Light" worked into it. They have it worked in between endword 11 (Life) and 12 (existance), but when I added endword 11A (Death) at that point, it seemed like there was a "Light" associated with death and that seemed to make sense. But when I reworking it this way, I seemed to get a sort of divine eturnal light (the Christian "lux aeterna") rather than an impression of a point source atomic light (which is what I seemed to get when I ran the old CC). The basic endwords of the confusion GPM are: 1. THE NOW 2. THE PAST 3. THE FUTURE 4. TIME 5. THE SPACE 6. MOTION 7. ENERGY 8. THE MASSES 9. THE SELF 10. THE OTHERS 10A. THE SOCIETY 11. THE LIFE 11A. DEATH (LIGHT) 12. EXISTENCE 13. CONDITIONS 13A. THE CAUSES 14. THE EFFECTS 14A. THE CONSEQUENCES 15. THE PICTURES 16. THE MIND 16A. THE BODY 16B. THE THOUGHTS 16C. THE MACHINERY 17. THE HISTORIES 18. THE REACTION 18A. THE TIME TRACK 18B. THE TRAP 19. THE GOALS (Ron has "THE GOAL") 19A. THE DESIRES 19B. THE SENSATIONS 19C. THE EMOTIONS 19D. THE CONFUSIONS 20. CHAOS 20A. UNCONSIOUSNESS 20B. REALITY 21. THE UNIVERSE (LIGHT) ---------------------------------- EXPANDED PLATEN FOR THE CONFUSION GPM (CLEARING COURSE PART C) LIGHT (front left) spot thetan Set One CREATING TO SURVIVE THE NOW SURVIVING TO CREATE THE NOW DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE NOW SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE NOW DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW Set Two CREATING TO SURVIVE THE PAST SURVIVING TO CREATE THE PAST DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE PAST SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE PAST DESTROYING TO CREATE THE PAST CREATING TO DESTROY THE PAST Set Three CREATING TO SURVIVE THE FUTURE SURVIVING TO CREATE THE FUTURE DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE FUTURE SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE FUTURE DESTROYING TO CREATE THE FUTURE CREATING TO DESTROY THE FUTURE Set Four CREATING TO SURVIVE TIME SURVIVING TO CREATE TIME DESTROYING TO SURVIVE TIME SURVIVING TO DESTROY TIME DESTROYING TO CREATE TIME CREATING TO DESTROY TIME Set Five CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SPACE SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SPACE DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SPACE SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SPACE DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SPACE CREATING TO DESTROY THE SPACE Set Six CREATING TO SURVIVE MOTION SURVIVING TO CREATE MOTION DESTROYING TO SURVIVE MOTION SURVIVING TO DESTROY MOTION DESTROYING TO CREATE MOTION CREATING TO DESTROY MOTION Set Seven CREATING TO SURVIVE ENERGY SURVIVING TO CREATE ENERGY DESTROYING TO SURVIVE ENERGY SURVIVING TO DESTROY ENERGY DESTROYING TO CREATE ENERGY CREATING TO DESTROY ENERGY Set Eight CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MASSES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MASSES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MASSES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MASSES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MASSES CREATING TO DESTROY THE MASSES Set Nine CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SELF SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SELF DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SELF SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SELF DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SELF CREATING TO DESTROY THE SELF Set Ten CREATING TO SURVIVE THE OTHERS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE OTHERS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE OTHERS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE OTHERS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE OTHERS CREATING TO DESTROY THE OTHERS Set Ten A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SOCIETY SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SOCIETY DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SOCIETY SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SOCIETY DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SOCIETY CREATING TO DESTROY THE SOCIETY Set Eleven CREATING TO SURVIVE THE LIFE SURVIVING TO CREATE THE LIFE DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE LIFE SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE LIFE DESTROYING TO CREATE THE LIFE CREATING TO DESTROY THE LIFE Set Eleven A CREATING TO SURVIVE DEATH SURVIVING TO CREATE DEATH DESTROYING TO SURVIVE DEATH SURVIVING TO DESTROY DEATH DESTROYING TO CREATE DEATH CREATING TO DESTROY DEATH Set Twelve CREATING TO SURVIVE EXISTENCE SURVIVING TO CREATE EXISTENCE DESTROYING TO SURVIVE EXISTENCE SURVIVING TO DESTROY EXISTENCE DESTROYING TO CREATE EXISTENCE CREATING TO DESTROY EXISTENCE Set Thirteen CREATING TO SURVIVE CONDITIONS SURVIVING TO CREATE CONDITIONS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE CONDITIONS SURVIVING TO DESTROY CONDITIONS DESTROYING TO CREATE CONDITIONS CREATING TO DESTROY CONDITIONS Set Thirteen A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CAUSES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CAUSES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CAUSES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CAUSES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CAUSES CREATING TO DESTROY THE CAUSES Set Fourteen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE EFFECTS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE EFFECTS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE EFFECTS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE EFFECTS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE EFFECTS CREATING TO DESTROY THE EFFECTS Set Fourteen A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CONSEQUENCES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CONSEQUENCES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CONSEQUENCES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CONSEQUENCES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CONSEQUENCES CREATING TO DESTROY THE CONSEQUENCES Set Fifteen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE PICTURES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE PICTURES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE PICTURES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE PICTURES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE PICTURES CREATING TO DESTROY THE PICTURES Set Sixteen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MIND SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MIND DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MIND SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MIND DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MIND CREATING TO DESTROY THE MIND Set Sixteen A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE BODY SURVIVING TO CREATE THE BODY DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE BODY SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE BODY DESTROYING TO CREATE THE BODY CREATING TO DESTROY THE BODY Set Sixteen B CREATING TO SURVIVE THE THOUGHTS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE THOUGHTS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE THOUGHTS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE THOUGHTS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE THOUGHTS CREATING TO DESTROY THE THOUGHTS Set Sixteen C CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MACHINERY SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MACHINERY DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MACHINERY SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MACHINERY DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MACHINERY CREATING TO DESTROY THE MACHINERY Set Seventeen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE HISTORIES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE HISTORIES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE HISTORIES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE HISTORIES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE HISTORIES CREATING TO DESTROY THE HISTORIES Set Eighteen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE REACTIONS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE REACTIONS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE REACTIONS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE REACTIONS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE REACTIONS CREATING TO DESTROY THE REACTIONS Set 18A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE TIME TRACK SURVIVING TO CREATE THE TIME TRACK DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE TIME TRACK SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE TIME TRACK DESTROYING TO CREATE THE TIME TRACK CREATING TO DESTROY THE TIME TRACK Set 18B CREATING TO SURVIVE THE TRAP SURVIVING TO CREATE THE TRAP DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE TRAP SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE TRAP DESTROYING TO CREATE THE TRAP CREATING TO DESTROY THE TRAP Set Nineteen CREATING TO SURVIVE THE GOALS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE GOALS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE GOALS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE GOALS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE GOALS CREATING TO DESTROY THE GOALS Set Nineteen A CREATING TO SURVIVE THE DESIRES SURVIVING TO CREATE THE DESIRES DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE DESIRES SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE DESIRES DESTROYING TO CREATE THE DESIRES CREATING TO DESTROY THE DESIRES Set Nineteen B CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SENSATIONS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SENSATIONS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SENSATIONS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SENSATIONS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SENSATIONS CREATING TO DESTROY THE SENSATIONS Set Nineteen C CREATING TO SURVIVE THE EMOTIONS SURVIVING TO CREATE THE EMOTIONS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE EMOTIONS SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE EMOTIONS DESTROYING TO CREATE THE EMOTIONS CREATING TO DESTROY THE EMOTIONS Set Nineteen D CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CONFUSION SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CONFUSION DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CONFUSION SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CONFUSION DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CONFUSION CREATING TO DESTROY THE CONFUSION Set Twenty CREATING TO SURVIVE CHAOS SURVIVING TO CREATE CHAOS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE CHAOS SURVIVING TO DESTROY CHAOS DESTROYING TO CREATE CHAOS CREATING TO DESTROY CHAOS Set Twenty A CREATING TO SURVIVE UNCONSCIOUSNESS SURVIVING TO CREATE UNCONSCIOUSNESS DESTROYING TO SURVIVE UNCONSCIOUSNESS SURVIVING TO DESTROY UNCONSCIOUSNESS DESTROYING TO CREATE UNCONSCIOUSNESS CREATING TO DESTROY UNCONSCIOUSNESS Set Twenty B CREATING TO SURVIVE REALITY SURVIVING TO CREATE REALITY DESTROYING TO SURVIVE REALITY SURVIVING TO DESTROY REALITY DESTROYING TO CREATE REALITY CREATING TO DESTROY REALITY Set Twenty-One CREATING TO SURVIVE THE UNIVERSE SURVIVING TO CREATE THE UNIVERSE DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE UNIVERSE SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE UNIVERSE DESTROYING TO CREATE THE UNIVERSE CREATING TO DESTROY THE UNIVERSE (end) (total 36 sets of items) -------------------- I would really like to know if people find this easier or harder to run than the original platen. I think that in this form its safe and easy to read, but I don't have much charge on implant items anymore so its hard for me to tell how this would affect a beginner. I'm now pretty sure that that unpleasant kick of the old CC platen is an indicator of missing items on a partially correct platen. One platen in Super Scio has that same kick and that is the "Big Splitter" implant that I put in chapter 9, and I know that one has problems and missing items (thats why I put it in chapter 9 with warnings instead of including it with all the other platens in chapter 8). I hope this helps. Best, The Pilot ========================================== All the above were posted with the following trailer - ------------------ The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net. See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm Some translations are available, see In German - www.sgmt.at/pilot.htm In Hungarian - www.extra.hu/self/index.html In Russian - http://www.user.cityline.ru/~cisergem/ and www.aha.ru/~espinol and http://www.tagil.ru/~sk/pilot/pilot.html. The MASTER LIST OF LRH TAPES which I posted recently is available both at fza.org and at http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/tapes.html All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives #37 and posted to ACT. See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG. Note that some of my posts only go to ACT. I cannot be reached by email. I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line. ------------------