Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot) Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 25 - EARLY MAR 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT Date: 3 Mar 1998 14:00:29 POST25.txt SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 25 - EARLY MAR 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT ========================================== Contents: subj : Super Scio Humor - THE IDES OF MARCH subj : Super Scio - About FZA Reposts subj : Super Scio - Astounding SciFi (to Andreas) subj : Super Scio - Answering RVY On Cats subj : Super Scio - To The Janitor subj : Super Scio - To Mark Brehob About Earthlink subj : Super Scio - On Picking Up Posts (attn Heidrun, Homer) subj : Super Scio - Answering Proud Mark subj : Super Scio - To Roland Re Freezoners subj : Super Scio - More On Avatar (attn Eldon & Ex-scient.) subj : Super Scio - GUIDE TO CONFIDENTIAL DATA ========================================== subj : Super Scio Humor - THE IDES OF MARCH HUMOR: THE IDES OF MARCH The Loyal Officers hiding in the 4th dimension have intercepted a film clip which might be of interest, especially in light of the upcoming March picket. So they asked me to pass it along. Have Fun, The Pilot ------------ Scenes from Shake and Bake's latest box office sensation: THE TRADGEDY OF DAVIDIUS MISCAVIAGUS ---- Clip #1 - The 3 Fates of Norse Mythology, known as the Norns appear shrowded in smoke. Their faces are revealed as the smoke clears - Flo Barnett who weaves the thread. Paulette Cooper who measures it. And Lisa Macpherson who cuts it. They sing: "Double, double, toil and trouble, we'll cut his thread and burst his bubble". ---- Clip #2 - Miscaviagus is addressing the assembled staff at Helmut. "Friends, auditors, missionaries, lend me your ears. I come to bury Hubbard, not to praise him. The evil that men do lives after them; The good is often interred with their bones; So let it be with Hubbard." ---- Clip #3 - A great armored limo is pulling up at the Ceders complex. Uniformed Sea Orgers surrond Miscaviagus as he disembarks from the vehicle. Two others in SO uniforms flank the top of the ASHO stairs and whisper. 1st Sea Orger: "The upstatmobile hath arriven". 2nd Sea Orger: "T'were better dubbed the ratmobile". 1st Sea Orger: "T'were better to speak no harm of Miscaviagus here". DM pushes in front of the crowd below and begins to mount the steps. An old crone with a scarf covered head shambles forth and shakes her arm at him. DM looks toward her and she pulls back her scarf. As the scarf falls away, it is revealed that this is really Gary Scarf in drag. He anounces loudly "BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH". DM begins to shout as Scarf scuttles away. DM: "Thou hast within thee undivulged crimes, Unwhipt of justice, hide thee, thou bloody hand". As he shouts, the 1st Sea Orger whispers to the other: "Now the hungry lion roars, and the wolf behowls the moon" ---- Clip #4 - Miscaviagus is walking through the tunnel beneath the street which links the ASHO and AO basements. He sees a skull lying against the wall and picks it up and addresses it. "Alas poor Yurick, I RPFed him". Then he laughs gleefully, tosses the skull back to the ground, and resumes walking. Suddenly there is a gust of wind and Hubbard's gost appears. Gost: "Murder Most Foul!". DM: "Thou hast within thee undivulged crimes". Gost: "Get thee to a Zoo". DM shrikes and runs away down the corridor. ---- Clip #5 - DM is in the warrens beneath ASHO and a crowd of RPFers are slinking towards him. One steps forward and says: "Doth an RPFer not bleed?" DM: "Thou hast within thee undivulged crimes". The RPFers shriek and run. ---- Clip #6 - An army of picketers crowd LRH Way between ASHO and AO. The great blue buildings tower around them. A closeup shot of one of the sticks holding a picket sign reveals that it is stamped "Birnam Lumber Co". The camera swings to the top of the ASHO steps where Miscaviagus stands with his chronies. 1st Chronie: "The Prophesy! Birnam wood to the complex doth come! Alas, all is lost". DM ignores him and is rubbing his hands as if washing them. He says "Out Damn Spot" as his chronies gather around and hustle him inside. ---- Clip #7 - DM has fled to the complex at Helmut. Crowds are storming towards the fences. He runs within a building and enters "The Planetary Control Room". Soon he is joined by his coven, the 12 who rule the organization on his behalf. They file in silently and surround him. They are Heber and Lesevre. Rinder and Yaeger. Rathburn and Spurlock. Mithoff and McShane. Lenske and Harris. Starkey and Schomer. Miscaviagus looks around with fear in his eyes. The tension is high. Then he strightens his back and looks to Ron's picture for a moment. Finally he turns back to the crowd, hoping to inspire them to sacrifice on his behalf. DM: "To Squirrel or not to Squirrel, that is the question. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing end them?" He indicates Ron's picture and begins the traditional cheer, raising his fist into the air on each word. DM: "Hip Hip ..." The 12 then raise their fists, but the fists contain daggers. They shout "Hurray" and charge Miscaviagus. He disappears under them and gives a single mornful cry. Then the crowd backs away and DM is revealed bleeding upon the floor. He looks up and utters his last words: "Et Tu Rinder?". --------------------------- The Loyalist Officers have provided this as a public service. It represents events on a parallel time track in another universe and may not be representative of events here on Earth. A Planetary Control Room was known to exist back in the late 1960s, but this tradition might not have carried into modern times within our own universe. The identities of the leaders are also slightly speculative, however the central comittee is know to have 13 members as in a witch's coven. Loyally Yours, The Loyalist Officers in 4th Dimensional Hiding ========================================== subj : Super Scio - About FZA Reposts ABOUT FZA REPOSTS Recently fza@fza.org (FreeZone America) has been reposting their archives including a lot of the messages I posted last year. They announced this in a message with subject line "FZA: REPOST: Thanking "Matt" the CoS spokesperson" > To those a.c.t. and a.r.s. regulars that have already been exposed to > the upcoming material - our apologies. If you see a msg with 'FZA:' > in the beginning of the subject line - then ignore it. But don't be > bashful in pointing out to others your opinions on the subject. "Matt" > may appreciate your insight and intelligence. Note that they were handling "Matt" who had started posting to the FZA bulletin board in an attempt to handle FZA. I suspect that "Matt" may be in the RPF by now. FZA might also have been doing it to offset the flood of CofS one liners being posted by the shills. I think that it is a good idea in general to have a trickel of FZA reposts hitting ARS for the sake of picking up CofS fence sitters who might look in occasionally and to encourage discussion of CofS reform and religious freedom. Note that I am not in contact with FZA except through the ARS and ACT newgroups, but I did publicly give my permission for anyone to spread my postings around on the internet. Most of the things I posted last year are still pertinent and I was glad to see them show up again and spark some additional discussion, and I'm happy to follow up on these. It would help, however, if these FZA reposts were labeled as reposts since many people might not have picked up FZA's original message about the reposting. But it is easy to tell the difference since my posts begin with "Super Scio" in the subject lines (because I said that I would do that for easy searching). And it might have been excessive for FZA to repost the entire self clearing book because it is easily downloaded from their site (and other locations as well). It would probably have been better to post a few chapters along with the URL for a full download, as they did with Filbert's book. I'm only offering these as friendly suggestions, I was quite happy to see FZA take such a strong positive action. I also noticed that only a few critics objected and many others immediately came to our defense. My thanks to Rebecca Hartong, Bob Minton, Rob Clark, Dave Bird, David Gerard, Laudanum, Hartley Patterson, and others for their support in this matter. Any CofS members who are reading this should please take note. The black and white picture of good guys and bad guys that is painted in policy is completely wrong. I think that we have been proving that one again and again on ARS. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Astounding SciFi (to Andreas) ASTOUNDING SCIFI (TO ANDREAS) On 12 Feb 98, heldal@online.no (Andreas Heldal-Lund) asked on subject "Dianetics" and "A sound investment" from Astounding > I've requested this long time ago, but try again: > > Do anybody know if the following two writings by Hubbard are > available: > > - "Dianetics" av Lafayette Ronald Hubbard printed in > Astounding no 5 1950. > or > - "A sound investment" in Astounding no 4 1949 under > the name Rene Lafayette. > > Yours faithfully, Andreas Heldal-Lund - Adm. TOXE CXI > _______________________________________________________ > OPERATION CLAMBAKE --------------> http://www.xenu.net/ > S T O P T H E C U L T O F S C I E N T O L O G Y Back in the early 1960s, I bought a box full of old Astoundings dirt cheap. It was an almost complete set from Nov 49 up through 1954. This included the May 1950 issue (number 5) with the "Dianetics" article. The Dianetics article was "Dianetics: The Evolution of a Science". A few years later I went back through them and read various "fact" articles that I had skipped the first time through including the Dianetics article. Note that Astounding regularly featured a "fact" article on a topic that was felt to be sci fi related, such as popular science type articles on rocket propulsion or the filming of a sci fi movie (Heinline wrote one on filming the "Destination Moon" movie which has been reprinted in one of the Heinline collections). Reading this 1950 article was what got me interested in Dianetics and Scientology in the first place. Later, in 1969 or 1970 I was doing the "Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course" (HSDC) and was being checked out on the book version of Evolution of a Science (EOS) which I had just read for about the 3rd time and I felt very bothered and decided that I had a "misunderstood" of some kind. The nagging feeling was that the book wasn't quite what I had read the first time back in 1965. So I dug out the old 1950 Astounding and compared it to the published book line by line. The original discussed the "Norns" (Norse Mythology) who spun the threads of a mans life. He uses two words in the book, one is "Engram" and the other is "Norn". The "Norn" was the actual incident which impacted the person and the "Engram" was the picture of the incident which could then be restimulated and have an ill effect on the person. This version included sentences such as: "The person, having recieved a Norn, now has an Engram". The revised book version, first published in 1952 changes the word "Norn" to the word "Engram". Therefor, the above sentence became: "The person, having recieved an Engram, now has an Engram". It has been a long time, and I no longer have the magazine, so there is a slight chance that I have reversed Norn and Engram (maybe the impact was the engram and the picture of it was the norn), but I'm certain of this collapse of two words (engram and norn) into a single word (engram). Since Astounding included some illustrations, there was a drawing of "The Norns" (3 old hags) along with the article. Everything else was identical to what is in the modern EOS book except for the last page. Where the published book ends, the magazine version goes on for a few more paragraphs which are addressed to the Sci Fi readers. That missing section said something like - "Eric Frank Russel was right, there is a Sinister Barrier in men's minds but it is not imposed from outside, its source lies within man himself". He was referring to Russel's sci fi novel "Sinister Barrier" which I have previously mentioned as being one of the sci fi stories about how people are controlled by invisible entities that make you kill yourself if you find out about them. Russel called his entities "Vitrons". They were supposed to feed on people'e emotions. The book is about somebody who discovers them and successfully avoids killing himself and then finds that the Vitron's begin influencing other people against him and eventually will even influence people to set off a World War to keep from being found out. Note that Russel also wrote "Dreadful Sanctuary" which is about Earth being a prison planet controlled by a secret world conspiracy and used as a dumping ground by the people of Mars and Venus who dumped their insane criminals here. In the previous issue (April), John Campbell (editor of Astounding) gave a really big buildup to the forthcoming Dianetics article, and continued to plug it in his editorials for a number of months thereafter. I think that there were also things in the letters to the editor for a few months and possibly a few minor follow up articles, but by mid 1951, Dianetics disappeared completely from Astounding. There were also ads for DMSMH and the early Dianetics foundations for a few months in 1950. When Astounding started plugging Dianetics, one of its competitors, "The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction", took exception and published critical articles. I had a handful of F&SF issues from that time period and I think that it was the June or July 1950 issue which had a scathing attack on Dianetics. I think that it was by James Blish (another noted Sci Fi writer), but again it has been a long time and I could be wrong about the exact date and author. Hope this helps, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Answering RVY On Cats ANSWERING RVY ON CATS On 18 Feb 98, writer@eskimo.com (Robert Vaughn Young) responded to my post "ON SCIENTOLOGY ATTACKING CATS" > The Pilot (pilot@hiddenplace.com) wrote: > > : ON SCIENTOLOGY ATTACKING CATS > > Since this post is about me, my wife and our work, let me respond a bit. > > : I am a Scientologist. I believe very deeply in the Scientology > : tech and the spiritual awareness that one can achieve by using it. > : I truely consider it to be my religion. > > : The average Scientologist would not attack somebody's pets as > : an indirect method of silencing a critic. They would consider > : such behavior to be unethical in the extreme. > > I agree with you that the average rank-and-file member would not do > anything like this but there is going to come a point when the > rank-and-file are going to have to speak out more about the tactics of > this organization. > > For example, when a sting operation was run by Scientology against a > federal judge, they crowed about it in their internal publication, > "Scientology News." When Heber Jentzsch gives briefings, he does the same, > talk about how these evil critics are being attacked. And the > rank-and-file members applaud and cheer. > > When are they finally responsible? > > I appreciate what you have brought up but there are definitely further > issues. You know as well as I do that it takes time for people to wake up (too damn long, but that's life), especially when they are constantly being manipulated by upper management (you know about that too). I don't think that you and Stacy were bad people when you were working for CofS. You might have things that you regret now from hindsight, but it took you time to wake up and you had access to more data than the average CofS members would. And huge numbers are staying away from the orgs, which is why the stats are collapsing. And a lot who are afraid to leave staff are cheering with an eye on the Ethics officer and little real enthusiasm. > : But Scientology management is behaving shamefully in attacking > : the Young's cats. > > : The ordinary Scientologists do not know this and do not condone > : it. They are fed false data by Scientology managment and have > : no awareness of what it going on. > > Whoa! Hang on! First, does that absolve them now that so much information > is available from the Net, from libraries etc. Second, I thought > Scientology was "knowing how to know." If the rank-and-file cannot know > what their own organization is doing, what does that say for preaching > that Scientology is how to know something? You can't have it both ways. Ha Ha. The "knowing how to know" has been bullshit for decades now. The actual formula (1952) was based on being able to evaluate existing data in the field of metaphysics and the actual practice of it requires actively squirreling and mixing practices as they are defined in the CofS today. Knowing how to know has been forbided by policy since KSW came out, but they still use the slogan because it sounds good. As far as the Net goes, you are right and that is what will do it in the long run. But remember that most Scientologists are behind the times in the computer area (the exception being many old tech people who became programmers, but most of them are like me, wanting to see reform and no longer supporting the bad org behavior). Last year was when many were trying to get online for the first time, often with second hand 486s and with horrible software and tech support from Earthlink. The Net exposure is Right Now. It takes time for this stuff to spread. It takes time for people to stop flinching at the unpleasant truth and do something. We are right in the middle of that at this time. That's why I expect things to happen soon. Before last year, it was like waving a hand infront of somebody whose eyes were closed. Now the eyes are opening and they are starting to focus. > : I ask you not to blame them for the bad behavior of the > : organization. > > Again, these are people who claim to have the corner on "knowing how to > know" so which way do you want it? If they don't know, then the tech > doesn't work and they are all innocent victims of a fraud. Or they know > how to know and don't care. Take your pick on that scale. As I said above. It was there once but its been perverted. > At the same time, I can appreciate the view of a Free Zoner who considers > himself/herself a Scientologist, albeit an exile. That is yet another > quandry. But let's not confuse that person with the rank and file person > on the "inside" who cheers when told the critics are being assaulted, > reminiscent of the required "five minute hate" sessions in "1984." > -- > *----------------------------------------------* > Robert Vaughn Young * The most potent weapon of the oppressor is * > writer@eskimo.com * the mind of the oppressed. - Steve Biko * Its too much of a generality. Many stay away. Many distance themselves from this "hate" business. Many put on a show for the Ethics officer. How many are really supporting this kind of insanity? My intention was simply to direct people's attention to the correct target which is CofS management and OSA. Any Scientologist reading the cat newsgroup would obviously be a cat lover and would be horrified at what OSA has been up to against your cats. I wanted to drive that wedge in there. Let them stop and think. Let them not feel personally attacked but instead have their attention put on the evil things that OSA is up to. Some will get it and some will doublethink, but even the doublethinkers will be one step closer and may come around when they hear of the next atrocity. OSA can't dead agent me without drawing attention to the free self clearing book and the freezone. So they have to ignore me. And I'm very pro tech. Scientologists love tech more than anything else. And I believe in Scientology and say so. So I think that most of them will listen and believe me when I say that OSA has been attacking your cats whereas they would tune out any critic as makeing up lies. My best to the cats, and the dog(s) too. The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - To The Janitor TO THE JANITOR On 8 Feb 98, rat@rat.org (The Janitor) posted on subject "Super Scrubber-The Janitor's Self-Cleaning Book" > In the beginning of Cleanetics(TM) the founder discovered many new > techniques to clean the planet with. J. Don Scrubbard(JDS), wrote the first > book about the clean tech in 1960. This book was the foundation of the > Cleanetics empire that became world famous. The Scrub Org was soon founded and > Scrubbard loaded up his 50 foot motor home and traveled the > countryside cleaning city after city of all the scum and debris that > cluttered up the streets. Using super tech-brooms and vacuum power > unknown to mankind before Cleanetics arrived, the Scrub Org Cleaned > the USA. (snip) > The Janitor > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get The Janitor's Super Scrubber 32 page rundown at > http://www.scrub.org with advance information on Cleanetics. > > ;) > This is a parody of "The Pilot" postings! Enjoy! Hilarious. Being parodied like this tells me that I've made the big time. But what about the 76 cesspools around larger cities and the story of how the Scrubbard eventually made the cleaning tech secret and thereby failed in his mission to clean the planet? Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - To Mark Brehob About Earthlink TO MARK BREHOB ABOUT EARTHLINK On 16 Feb 98, brehob@cps.msu.edu (Mark W Brehob) responsed to subject "FZA: The Latest CoFs Plans To Get The Stats Up" > [Interesting FZA stuff clipped. I actually followed > most of it] > : Also in the news is earthlink's new anti-spam campaign. As you > : have probably noticed, they don't really give a damn about > : get-rich-quick advertisements. This is a shore story to build > : up their credibility and protect their reputation before they > : launch a massive cancellation campaign against anti-Scientology > : postings. > > : Has anybody heard anything about earthlink visiting other ISPs > : or news servers to install anti-Spam controls or to get help in > : tracking down "Spammers" (which really means annonymous ARS > : posters)? > > : The Pilot > > Do you have _any_ evidence of that? Why do you believe it? > > I don't pay too much attention to Earthlink _but_ > they appear to have stayed out of the ARS stuff > thus far. Why do you expect a change? > > Mark Note that this was an FZA repost of a message I posted in May of last year. My information on Earthlink has grown a bit stale and I'm not sure how much control the Scientologists retain at this point nor how friendly they are to the CofS. Also note that a business owned by Scientologists is not the same thing as a front group controlled by CofS. Sometimes they are very much in bed with the org and sometimes they are very cool and maintain as much distance as possible. Early last year, I was hearing from various Scientologists about how their friends who were working for Earthink were promoting to them about getting onto the internet via Earthlink. Then I was hearing stories from Scientologists about Earthlink's terrible tech support and about all the problems associated with using their service. Then I was hearing nothing about Earthlink. Concurrently with this, I was hearing all sorts of stuff about Earthlink's big anti-Spam campaign while at the same time they seemed to be one of the biggest sources for spam. And there were rumors of them playing ball with OSA. But all of this seemed to fade out last fall. I have no idea what the situation is right now, but I can offer a hypothesis based on things I have seen with other Scientologist's businesses sometimes. Some Scientologists start a business. They begin promoting it on internal lines among other Scientologists. The Scientologists like to support each other and they start using this business. The business maintains very good relations with the org, doing favors etc., a bit of a one hand washes the other kind of thing. But the Scientology businesses often concentrate on big league sales and have high prices (Survial Insurance is an example) and do not produce a competative product. The next thing that happens is that various Scientologists who have used the service start complaining to ethics. They can't use any "wog" means to bitch about the poor service. Scientologists are not supposed to take each other to court. So ethics starts getting flooded with Knowledge Reports about this company. If the volume gets too high, ethics summons the people at the company and gives them a talking too. The Scientology businessmen don't like this and begin distancing themselves from the organization. Soon the business is being run by a bunch of fence sitters who stay as far away from the org as they can while avoiding getting declared (because that would cost them business) and relationships have cooled noticably. Also, if a Scientologist is makeing big bucks, they tend to get pressured about makeing big contributions to various things and sometimes they get sick of that and start distancing themselves. Or sometimes the businessmen get mishandled by the org and get disaffected. As I said, I have no idea what the current scene is at Earthlink, but I wouldn't be surprised if the relationship has grown cool. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - On Picking Up Posts (attn Heidrun, Homer) ON PICKING UP POSTS (Attn Heidrun, Homer) On 13 Feb 98, concern@atnet.at (Heidrun Beer) posted on subject "Re Pilot" > On Fri, 13 Feb 1998 00:30:33 -0500 (EST), Homer W. Smith wrote: > > > > > Pilot has mailed a spate of postings to a.c.t., which y'all > > should go take a look at. > > You mean, download all of a.c.t. - all the stuff which I already > have in my mailbox? > > Maybe somebody who usually downloads a.c.t. could help? Ralph > normally forwards the Pilot-posts, but he is not here at the moment. > > Robert? > > Heidrun Beer Most newsreaders have an option setting which lets you only pull the titles of the posts. Then you click on the specific ones that you want and it only downloads those. I always collect everything together into either one (or sometimes two) archive files, so those are all that you need. Every individual post has the archive file number(s) mentioned at the bottom. Paul at FZA usually picks these archives up almost immediatly and places them in his archives. The filenames at FZA always seem to be in the form - http://fza.org/pilot/posts/post##.txt Substitute the archive number (as mentioned above) in place of ##. Strangly, I've noticed that newsact.lightlink.com seems to get half of the posts (at random) almost immediately and then the rest trickel in slowly. The open newserver at lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu seems to get just about everything very quickly. And they will only have a small number of postings because they age things off in a day or two. So its a good place to pick things up immediately although it doesn't have the long term capacity of lightlink. There is also a decent gopher that I included a link to on the Reformer's Homepage. That lets you pull the titles up in a web browser and then click on the one you want. When you reach the gopher the first time, just add it to your bookmarks or quicklist or whatever so you can just go back to it as needed. ----- As far as using annonymous email to send something into clear-l (which Homer suggested), I haven't started using email from the Pilot identity yet, but I'm gearing up to do this when the time seems right. So I have a couple of questions for Homer. a) Does your anonymous remailer log the IP address when someone connects to it? b) Is there a message size limit on the anonymous remailer? c) Is there a message size limit on things that are sent into clear-l? Affinity, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - Answering Proud Mark ANSWERING PROUD MARK On 12 Feb 98, nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) replied to my earlier post on subject "Super Scio - To Mark The Proud Scieno" > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998 15:00:18 +0100, pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot) > wrote: > > > > > TO MARK THE PROUD SCIENTOLOGIST > > > > > > Your troll was hilarious. > > Hi Pilot. A troll, are you really sure about that? Yup. > > > > I liked it when you put Wgert in his place. Even talking half > > truths as you do, you have put out more positive comm about > > the tech than he ever did. > > What do you specifically mean by half truths? See below. > > > > You provided an excellent example of how the orthodox > > Scientologists should be communicating. Scientology lurkers > > should note how politely the critics talked with you. > > Yes, that is part of my intentions to do that. Ther is no reason why ANY > Scientologists wouldn't be able to communicate in this way, is it? I > agree that most of the critics of my Church have been very polite, but > if you read carefully now, you will see that a few of them have gone > into attack mode, and they don't care any longer about that I condemn > the behaviour of my Church. Now a few is out to ridicule the belief > system as such. Very interesting development, wouldn't you say? Am I > about to prove anything, or what do you think? I think that most will defend your right to believe as you want and the ones who think your ideas are stupid will eventually just stop reading your posts. There might be an occasional joke at your expense, but even the President of the United States suffers from those. > > Of course you can't be "doing OT8". From what I've heard, it > > takes about a month and you don't get off the ship while you're > > doing it. The course packs are supposed to be chained to the > > wall. This is my example of one of your "half truths". If you were actually on the orthodox OT8 level when you stated that your were, you would not have been able to post to the newsgroup at that time. So either you were not on OT8, or it was a freezone OT 8 where the rules are different. > > Then again, maybe you've got an org in a different universe > > with different rules. > > > > My guess is the freezone universe. > > Hey Pilot, may I give you a new possibility? Could there exist a > Scientologist in good standing, which also is freely moving wherever he > wants to be. Be that the free zone, the Church, or wherever he chooses > to find the light? Only if he kept OSA and Ethics from finding out that he was doing that. I like this "new possibility" and it's the way that I think things should be, but I know of too many contrary examples. Here is an experiment you could try. Walk into an org and tell the registrar that you've had some freezone auditing and now would like to get some orthodox standard tech so that you can compare the two. I think that you'll end up in ethics right quick. > > Thanks, > > > > The Pilot > > > > ARC Pilot. > > --------------------------------------- > Mark. A Scientologist, and proud of it! --------------------------------------- I don't want to rain on your parade. I've been enjoying this immensly. Have you noticed that it's mostly the OSA shills who call you a wacko? ARC, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - To Roland Re Freezoners TO ROLAND RE FREEZONERS On Feb 13, 98, Roland posted on subject "Nutty Freezone Squirrels" > The freezoner, on the other hand, considers that the story > might be slightly wrong and so changes the story and changes > the processes of Scientology accordingly. Of course they think about the subject and if it seems appropriate they change the story, or adjust it or whatever. This is the difference between a thinking individual who has a religion and a stupid religious fanatic who takes everything in a literal minded manner. The parallel in Christianity is the many intelligent Christians who reconcilled the 7 days of Genisis with Darwin by considering the "days" to be a rough draft of geological epochs as opposed to the fanatics who held "monkey trials". This is just sour grapes because it is harder to poke fun at Scientologists if they are not Xemu fanatics. But don't dispair, I have seen some very funny stuff poking fun at me (the Janitor's Self Cleaning book for example), so it can be done. ----- But maybe you were trolling so as to prove a point. And it is a good point and has been well made. When you made a critical remark about the freezone, it did not trigger the CofS style viscious behavior. There was no crazy declaration labeling you as an enemy. None of the freezoner's launched dead agent attacks against you. There were no court cases initiated. There were no dead cats on your doorstep. If you want to be a freezone critic, be my guest, and we can have many good arguments. But it is distracting right now and I would prefer to leave it until after the bad behavior of the CofS has been handled. However, even if we argue philosophically, I will still enjoy other things that you post and I will continue to support your Xenu leaflet (because it helps wake up the idiot fanatics). I don't pull those fanatical black/white value judgements which try to sort people into good guys and bad guys. And that's the real point. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - More On Avatar (attn Eldon & Ex-scient.) MORE ON AVATAR (attn Eldon & Ex-scient.) Around 20 Feb 98, fza@fza.org (FreeZone America) reposted my post of July 1997 titled "Concerning Avatar". The subject line (of the repost) was "FZA: Concerning Avatar". They probably should have marked it as a repost (all the "FZA: ..." subject headers are reposts) but I'm glad they reposted it because I've finally found out about Avatar as a result. In the original post, I passed on an unfounded rumor about their using sensory deprivation tanks. I admit that I was taking a bit of a nasty shot at them and it was a bit of a troll because of their annoying wall of secrecy. The last thing I want to see is a group springing up that has even more confidentiality than the CofS. And people were asking me about Avatar, so I passed on the only story that I've heard. I was hopeing to get somebody to post some real data in response and it didn't happen when my post hit back in July. But it seems to have stirred everything up this time around and finally served its purpose. And it looks like a good insider story on Avatar has been around for years and I just hadn't found it. I highly recommend it and it sounds truthful to me although again I have no other verification. The story is by Eldon Braun (EldonB123@aol.com) and is in five parts at the following URLs http://www.digiweb.com/~ozark/awareness/avatar1-5 http://www.digiweb.com/~ozark/awareness/avatar2-5 http://www.digiweb.com/~ozark/awareness/avatar3-5 http://www.digiweb.com/~ozark/awareness/avatar4-5 http://www.digiweb.com/~ozark/awareness/avatar5-5 -------------- If the story is accurate, then Harry Palmer and his main organization are pretty slimy, which is what I would have expected considering the amount of confidentiality and so forth. -------------- The basic Avatar levels 1 to 3, on the other hand, don't sound bad, again assuming that the story presents their tech accurately. I haven't read Basher, but this idea of how to as-is a thought (or any creation) is pretty much a basic in metaphysics, at least as I got it when I was growing up. The only thing that struck me as new was the phrase "heat it up" instead of "intensify it". I think that this is in Zen and Science of Mind and earlier sources and that Basher was just outlining a commonly accepted idea. But most of my metaphysics is a jumbled up mess from my family, so I can be very off base sometimes about what came from where. And of course these ideas are in 1953 Scientology. We have as-isness and we have copying pictures and thoughts, and we have intensifying things and all that stuff. I always assumed that this was part of TR 0, or of getting your TRs in on something, but of course many people don't get that on a TRs course (unless they have read CofHA and Phoenix Lectures before doing the course). You will find this kind of thing in the Self Clearing book as well, and I didn't get it from Basher or Avatar (neither of which I knew anything about until now). Its just 1953 stuff seen in the light of an early upbringing in metaphysics. But the fact that the data is already well known doesn't invalidate the course. In fact, a good two week course in as-isness (discreating), taught like a TRs course and with lots of drilling sounds like a really good idea. So why make it confidential? That's the first outpoint. Just because somebody can get ahold of a TRs HCOB doesn't substitute for doing a TRs course. The same would go for drilling as-isness. Exposing the data probably wouldn't hurt the Avatar Master's business, it might even help it. And opening the communications might aid them in improving their course because of a free and open interchange of ideas. And my impression from reading that story is that Harry's training might have been inadequate unless the prospective Master was already bringing a lot to the table. Open communications might fill in the weaknesses for those that need it and also allow the entire subject to move forward. The second outpoint is that this is a limited technique that can only be pushed so far. Two weeks is just fine and the results should be immense if it is done right, but you will reach a point where you are bypassing too much of the guy's case and he will bog. You can't make it all the way to OT on present time as-isness alone. This is the 1953 approach and they had a lot more tricks for it than Avatar does. And it is just not enough. You can only go so far and then your case begins to drag you back. I know because I've used this kind of thing a lot. You can get into present time and drop lots of baggage. You can unmock the postulate that the past affects the present and get significant gains. But you can't keep it unmocked because every time you collect interest on a bank account, or expect to receive a paycheck for work you did last week, you reaffirm the postulate that the present is the result of the past. You can put aside things temporarily that you cannot put aside on a permanent operating basis. And so you hit limits and constraints in how far you can go with something like this. But modern standard tech flopped the other way, and concentrates almost exclusively on case. That is also fatal because you validate case too much. My own consideration in the matter is that the only way out is to do both, either alternately or in combination. You can push either one exclusively for awhile, but just count on having to balance it out. And that brings us to the third outpoint, which is to say that this is all that one needs and that case handling becomes unnecessary. The usual over inflated PR and sales bullshit that leaves one up the creek without a paddle, not because the tech used was wrong, but because all other tech was invalidated and one is steered down a course that dries up before it reaches the destination. Why not just be honest and promote it as a damn good course and a real horsepower booster, assuming, of course, that they are capable of delivering that? The only reason that I can see for these outpoints is that Harry wanted power and control and big bucks and is sitting in a late era Hubbard valence. At least Ron had his good period in the 1950s. You might say that he at least payed his dues. Harry seems to have jumped straight into the confidentiality and the chicanery from the start. And the funny thing is that he could have done better by doing it all in an aboveboard manner. If he could come up with one course, he could come up with a dozen. I certainly could. There is all of metaphysics and 1950s Scientology to tap. Makeing hybrids of these things has tremendous potential. Without the bullshit promises and maybe slightly lower prices (and much lower royalties), he could have a repeat public and lots of happy customers. And without the confidentiality there would be enough ideas flying around freely that he could put together new courses fairly easily. He could have gotten rich on volume. Of course I'd tell people to roll up their sleaves and get to work on self clearing. But there are books on how to program computers too and yet most people choose to take courses, at least to learn the basics. It's often faster to have a helping hand. And a training approach is much more economical than a professional one-on-one processing approach. ------ I don't think that there is any tech which needs to be confidential to work or which is too dangerous to be revealed. My current working assumption is that the degree of out ethics is directly proportional to the degree of confidentiality. ------ I wonder if Harry could wake up and reform and clean up his act? And my appologies to those Avatar Masters who are working hard to deliver a good course. Best, The Pilot ========================================== subj : Super Scio - GUIDE TO CONFIDENTIAL DATA GUIDE TO CONFIDENTIAL DATA There has been a wealth of Scientology confidential material posted to the internet. This began with the Fishman materials, continued with the Scamizdat postings, and culminated in the postings of Nots and other materials which were webbed at the Operation Clambake sites. Many fence sitters, freezoners, reformers, etc. are interested in collecting these things for purposes of continuing their practice of the Scientology religion outside of the confines of the orthodox CofS. These materials are still all over the net but they have become a bit harder to locate and it helps to have a list of what is there and some idea of the keywords that one might search for. Search engines that poke at web sites and pick up FTP file names can often provide links to things that are not listed on HTML pages if you can pick out some unusual keyword (like Amprinistics which is mentioned in an ethics order that was included in Scamizdat 11). Occasionally these files are "accidentally" left lying around where search engines can spot them. Also, these things get posted and reposted occasionally and end up in various obscure news archives and again it is helpful to have keywords for searching. Some of the people who wish to further their studies of the Scientology religion in this manner also need more information as to what is what and where the various things fit on the orthodox bridge. Therefore, I felt that it would be helpful to provide a guide to the materials that are available. Since the largest and most confused collection is that provided by Scamizdat 11, and since there is already a detailed index provided at the Scamizdat website, I downloaded their index and annotated it in detail. They might want to put this annotated version up at their site. Note that I'm not Scamizdat. Most of these materials from Scamizdat have been repackaged and made available at various times at various websites, so it is not the only source for these things. This is just to help people trying to sort out the entire package and to clue them in as to what they should be able to find. Following that, I'll list what else is available. For a well written list of the various OT levels, see "The Scientology OT Levels & Confidential Material Summary List" which is occasionally posted to ARS by sinner@primenet.com (SinSinner) and which can be found at www.primenet.com/~sinner/JOT4.TXT. -------- IMPROVED SCAMIZDAT 11 INDEX For those who are studying tech, more information and annotation is needed to sort out the mess of materials in Scamizdat number 11. A detailed index is available at the scamizdat website. The original lines from it are marked >. Here I have annotated the section for scam #11. Also, I have added line numbers in the form 00000. This assumes that this has been converted to txt using an HTML to text tool. The line numbers might not always correspond, but they give an indication of relative depth. Occasionally I have added an additional line from the scam post where I thought that it was useful. In other cases, I have provided additional information based on my familiarity with tech. Sometimes I checked things in the tech vols. If I looked and didn't find something, I said so. Therefore, if I didn't say anything about an ordinary (non-confidential) HCOB, it just means that I was lazy. And if something was in the old tech vols, it is probably in the new one's too but I didn't bother looking. My appologies, but I put some hours into verifying parts of this thing and I thought that was enough for credibility. > =================== SCAMIZDAT #11 ================== > > Date: 12 October 1995 > > Introduction > [If you are an identifiable critic, you may be next.] 00079 > OPERATIONS OFFICER > [Re: Successful and Unsuccessful Actions ; 9 March 1970] > [1970; ? and Mo Budlong] > [Successful... Direct theft of documents.] > > DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO > Ops Planning > Ops Execution 00338 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 APRIL 1968 > INTELLIGENCE ACTIONS > [1968] > [Investigate for crimes, the individuals who are creating trouble.] 00403 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1973 > HANDLING DISCONNECTIONS > [1973] > DISCONNECTION by Ens. Judy Ziff, CS-5 > CONFIDENTIAL > Industrial Intelligence Text Note > [L. Ron Hubbard] > [The trick is to get an unemployed ex Intelligence Officer, metered...] > > CONFIDENTIAL ; INTELLIGENCE ACTIONS > COVERT INTELLIGENCE ; DATA COLLECTION > [1969; L. Ron Hubbard] > [...remove his agents and vanquish his troops and we directly attack...] > COVERT OPERATIONS > SECURITY > OVERT DATA COLLECTION > DATA HANDLING > THE WAR 00884 > ETHICS ORDER ; September 17, 1965 > SUBJECT: SUPPRESSIVE PERSON > [1965] > [..."Jack" Horner is hereby declared a Suppressive... Declared FAIR GAME.] also mentioning Amprinistics and J. Edgar Watson from Andy Parlogean - Ethics, Los Angeles 00929 > Ethics Order No. 118 27 February 1969 > SUBJECT: SUPPRESSIVE GROUP > [1969] > [The Suppressive Group "Dianology"... run... by Jack Horner...] "The Suppressive Group "Dianology" sponsored by the "Reform Church of Scientology" is being run in L.A. by Jack Horner, a Declared Suppressive." 00969 > Letter to Jane [Kember] from "Peter Hollond" > [L. Ron Hubbard, presumably] > [...THESE ARE THE GROUPS I WANT DESTROYED.] 01031 > SEA ORGANIZATION > FLAG INFORMATION LETTER 822 ; 8 June 1989 > A NEW SLANT ON LIFE ; VITAL SURVEY RESULTS 01312 > Scientology: Booklet 27 of the Professional Course > Scientific Press: Phoenix, 1952 > SEARCH FOR INCIDENTS ON THE TRACK > [1952; L. Ron Hubbard; Tape transcript] > DEMONSTRATION This booklet was a transcription of the auditing demo given in the first half of HCL 27, "How to search for incidents on the track Part 1", Tape 5203CXX of March 1952. It used to be available as part of the HCL lectures on reels in the 1970s but it has been omitted from the R&D volumes and is probably skipped in the casset version of the HCL lectures. It is probably considered to be confidential at this time. 01639 > THE BB [Basic-Basic] GPMs > FOREIGN LANGUAGE CAUTION > THE BB GPM This is OT 2 Chapter 9. A bit of the introduction was included in Fishman and can be found at line 15251 of scam 11 (below) but he didn't include the actual platen. This copy has the full platen. To help identify the actual platen, it begins with: "Each set of 26 items is run through on each endword; 1-26 for endword 1, then 1-26 on endword 2, etc. More instructions after the command set." and it has an Explosion before each item. > THE BASIC GPM > THE BASIC GPM Trillions 150 > [10 September 1966] > [You must construct a picture machine; > You must not construct a picture machine...] This is OT 2 Chapter 10. > ONE COMMAND GPM Trillions 30th > [5 September 1966] > [Seek treasure; Do not seek treasure...] This is OT 2 Chapter 11. 02165 > INSTRUCTIONS FOR RUNNING LOWER L.P. GPM > THE LOWER ; LPGPM LP of 8 items This was Chapter 12 of OT 2. Note that LP stands for Line Plot. It is dated 5 Sep 66. Here is a quote to aid in finding this: "[For example, the first command would be: "To create nice pictures." The last would be "Those who desire to create mystifying pictures."]" I didn't get this far in OT 2 myself before attesting, so I can't guarantee this one, but it seems accurate. 02251 > HCOB 16 June, 1969 > Running Out GPM's on End Words > [1969; L. Ron Hubbard] This is a Grade 6 HCOB which is mislabled as OT 6. I don't remember this bulletin and I can't guarantee that it is accurate. It is probably just a careless transcription. 02283 > ASSISTS > Class VIII Course, Lecture #10 > [1968; L. Ron Hubbard] > [Story of the R6 implant] This is a partial transcript of the Oct 3, 1968 class 8 lecture which discusses OT 3 in detail. > GLOSSARY This is a glossary that somebody else added on to the Assists transcript (above) to help non-Scientologists to understand it. 02835 > HCO BULLETIN OF 11 MAY, AD 15 > SCIENTOLOGY VII > THE POWER PROCESSES > [1965; L. Ron Hubbard] > I - SOURCE > THEORY OF THE SOURCE PROCESS > II - EXISTENCE > THEORY OF THE EXISTENCE PROCESS > III CONDITIONS > THEORY OF THE CONDITIONS PROCESS This is the basis of Grade 5 Power Processing. The 3 sections, I, II, and III, became known as power processes 4, 5, and 6 (abbreviated to Pr Pr 4, 5, 6) because the first 3 power processes are repair actions that are not normally done. 03205 > HCO BULLETIN OF 21 FEBRUARY 1970 > END PHENOMENA AND F/NS IN POWER > [1970; L. Ron Hubbard] This is a class 8 update on how to run the Grade 5 Power Processing above. 03313 > THE POWER PROCESSES > [L. Ron Hubbard] This seems to be a command sheet giving the full set of 6 power processes (including 4, 5, and 6 descussed in detail at 02835 above). 03387 > HCO INFORMATION LETTER OF APRIL 11, 1962 > DYNAMIC PROCESSING CHECKS > [1962] > First Dynamic > Second Dynamic (Family) > Second Dynamic (Sex) > Third Dynamic > Fourth Dynamic > Fifth Dynamic (Animal, veg, Mineral) > Sixth Dynamic (Physical Univ. MEST) > Seventh Dynamic (Spiritual) > Eighth Dynamic (For non-Scientologists) > Infinity or God Dynamic > Eighth Dynamic (for Scientologists) A non-confidential info letter providing a set of "sec checks". It is not in old tech volume 5 but it does appear in altered form in new tech volume 6. The alteration is that the line "received from Jan Halpern, International Council Member" was changed to "received from an International Council Member" Since Jan's first name still appears later in the info letter (even in the altered version in the new tech vols), I assume that the scamiz post contains the true original version. This could be part of auditor training materials for doing sec checks or the false purpose rundown or grade 2 (there are a lot of sec checking forms and this is a minor one). 03646 > PROFESSIONAL AUDITORS BULLETIN NO. 51 > 29th April 1955 ; SPOTTING SPOTS > [1955; L. Ron Hubbard] > [Spot a spot in the space of this room.] This is on page 188-9 of old tech volume 2. I checked this one in detail for accuracy and it matches. 03772 > NON-EXISTENCE FORMULA ; December 16, 1989 > ELAINE SIEGEL, SNOW WHITE PGMS CHF OSA US > [1989l Elaine Siegel] > [...expand the functions of the Snow White Unit OSA US...] Note that this is a "white wash". It discusses the Snow White program as having been set up to operate by legal means using the Freedom of Information Act etc. They seem to have set up such a unit and made it operate legally so that future references to Snow White will tend to trace back to the new above board legally operating program instead of finding the old covert operation. The goal seems to be to provide sloppy researchers with an easy to find innocuous reference for the name. 03883 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1965 ; Issue VI > CENTRAL FILES SECTION > [...HELP RON COLLECT AND HOLD ALL NAMES, ADDRESSES...] 03910 > HCO BULLETIN OF 9 APRIL 1960 > OUTFLOW > [1960] > [...write lots of letters... over and over, regardless of response.] 03977 > SCN POLICY DIRECTIVE 19 7 July 1982 > THE INTEGRITY OF SOURCE > [1982; WATCHDOG COMMITTEE for the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL] > [No one except LRH can revise his issues...] 04022 > INTELLIGENCE ACTIONS > COVERT INTELLIGENCE > DATA COLLECTION > [1969] > [Tips, connections and documents are the stuff in trade...] 04112 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29TH JUNE 1971 > [1971; L. Ron Hubbard] > [...assign any case or upset... to... interference... by medicine or > psychiatry.] 04143 > SIGNING YOUR LIFE AWAY TO THE CLAMS > [...I CONTRACT MYSELF TO THE SEA ORGANIZATION FOR THE NEXT BILLION YEARS.] 04159 > Policy of Freedom and Pamphlet Publications in the U.S. > [L. Ron Hubbard] > [As 49% in the U.S. favor Freedom (of Speech, Religion, Press)...] 04267 > INTELL TRs > [Mo Budlong] > TR 3 INT > [...to get the answer to a question without startling a target.] > TR 3 INT WITH BULLBAITING > [...to improvise and maintain cover...] By Mo Budlong DG Info WW. INTELL referes to Intelligence Operatives. 04342 > INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE - TR L > [To train the student to give a false statement...] 04385 > BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN ; OF 10 DECEMBER 1969 > REISSUED AS BTB 21 JUNE 1975 > REPORTER TRS > Answering non loaded questions > No Answer > Non sequitur events > Handling a suppressive T.V. interviewer > Handling an SP > By overwhelm > By being knowingly covertly hostile > By stalling for time > By handling the reporter in front of you (verbal Karate) " By Sheila Gaiman PRAWW From the hat write up of David Gaiman PR Chief WW" Note that for a time in the 1970s, bulletins and policies that were not by Ron were supposed to be issued as Board Tech Bulletins (BTBs) instead of HCOBs, and as Board Policy Letters (BPLs) instead of HCOPLs. They took various older HCOBs and HCOPLs (such as the HCOB given here) that were by somebody else and reissued them as BTBs and BPLs during this time period. Earlier practice was to issue HCOBs etc. with other peoples names on them (at least sometimes). Later, it was recognized that staff tended to ignore BTBs (I remember one Sea Org auditor referring to them as toilet paper) so the late 1970s practice was to issue everything as HCOBs by Ron. 04563 > BOARD POLICY LETTER ; 30 May 1974 > PR SERIES 24 ; HANDLING HOSTILE CONTACTS/DEAD AGENTING > [1974] > [Spot who is attacking us.... Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime...] by "Alethiea C. Taylor Acting LRH Pers Sec ". 05026 > L12 - The Flag OT Executive Rundown > TECHNICAL BULLETIN ; 31 JULY 1984 ; ISSUE VII > THE "L" RUNDOWNS ; THE L12 RUNDOWN STEP SIX > [1984] 05224 > HCO ETHICS ORDER > FROM: ETHICS OFFICER WW 29th December 1969 > SUBJECT: JOHN McMASTER - WRIT OF EXPULSION > [1969; Ros Vosper] > [PLACING HIMSELF IN A POSITION OF BLACKMAIL WITH HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS] by "Ros Vosper HCO Area Sec. WW". 05262 > NED for OTs Series 38 > BASIC FEAR > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > [...they will become worse, go down scale.] > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1978 ; ISSUE III > NED for OTs Series 31 > THE THETAN HAND TECHNIQUE > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > [Pass the "thetan hand" between [masses of thetans]...] > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978 ; ISSUE I > NED for OTs Series 1 > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > NED FOR OTs RD ; THEORY OF > SOMATICS > MENTAL TRANSMISSION > VALENCES AND "SHELL BT" > DATA ON MIS-RUN DIANETICS > DUB-IN > MEMORY > DORMANT BTs AND CLUSTERS > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 14 NOVEMBER 1978 > NED for OTs Series 34 > THE SEQUENCE FOR HANDLING A PHYSICAL CONDITION > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > Step One -- The Item > Step Two -- The Body Part > Step Three -- Illness > Step Four -- Cures for Illness > Step Five -- Protest of Cures for the Illness > Step Six -- Body Part > Step Seven -- Item > Step Eight -- Illness on It > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1978 ; ISSUE III > NED for OTs Series 35 > NOTES ON PTS > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1978 ; ISSUE I > NED for OTs Series 36 > ROCKSLAMS > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > > > HCO BULLETIN OF 11 DECEMBER 1978 ; ISSUE II > NED for OTs Series 43 > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > REPAIR LIST FOR ERRORS IN OT III > INSTRUCTIONS > CAUTIONS > REPAIR LIST FOR ERRORS IN RUNNING OT III See the full Nots auditors pack elsewhere on the internet. 06036 "OPERATING THETAN SECTION VIII The following is a suggestion for OT8:" This is the 8th dynamic version of OT8 that has been around on the internet. The processes seem sensible, but I suspect that it is a freezone development. > [CLEARING COURSE INSTRUCTION BOOKLET] This is an error in the posted table of contents. The following are OT 2 rather than CC. The opening section on the state of clear is an explanation to those who have already done the clearing course as to why they are now to run even more implant platens even though they are "clear". The real CC instruction booklet is at 7505 below. 06196 > The State of Clear This is from the introduction to the OT 2 materials. See the Fishman OT 2 below at 14895. Fishman has the general introduction and list of implants and then gives chapters 1 to 3 with platens. It starts chapter 4 (The House GPM below) and then cuts off. Here is where you find the next set of platens from chapter 4 onwards. 06227 > The House GPM OT 2 Chapter 4. 06297 > The Psycho GPM OT 2 Chapter 5. 06344 > The Banky GPM OT2 Chapter 6. 06370 > The Forerunner GPM OT 2 Chapter 7. See OT 2 chapter 8 at 6830 below and Chapters 9 to 12 at 6139 above. 06522 > THE LOWER BANK GPM > THE LOWER BANK 24 Aug 1966 > [1966] > [To build a postulatingness machine ; Not to think yourself] This is OT 2 chapter 15 (the final chapter). Note that chapters 13 and 14 are missing from this post and are not on the internet as far as I can determine. Most people did not go through all the chapters of OT 2 before attesting to the level. 06830 > [O.T. COURSE - PART ONE] > [1966; L. Ron Hubbard] > THE ARROW THE DOUBLE ROD > WOMAN > WHITE BLACK SPHERE > HOT COLD > LAUGHTER - CALM > DANCE MOB This is OT 2 chapter 8, also present in Fishman at 15140 below > [CLEARING COURSE INSTRUCTION BOOKLET] Again an inaccurate heading in the index. The real CC instruction booklet is at 7505 below. 06916 > The Pattern of the Bank This is a good transcript of Briefing Course Lecture and Film SH-Spec 51 (eg. 2nd 51 in the old SHSBC numbering series) of 30 Dec 64. It is also known as "The R6 film" and was on the theory section of the old Grade 6 Solo course. It is CONFIDENTIAL and is not included in the new SHSBC cassettes. I can't actually verify it, but it seems to match the film that I saw. 07176 > Mastery of GPMs This is SHSpec-50 of 22 Dec 64 and was also filmed as well as being available as a taped lecture. It is a companion to "Pattern of the Bank" above but was not always included in the Grade 6 course. Prior to Dianetic Clear, everybody did the R6 theory course on their way up to the OT levels and had one or both of the above plus some HCOBs on GPM theory before they ever got near the CC or OT 2 materials. When Dianetic Clear came out, they went onto OT 1 (simple), and then OT 2 (intense running of GPM platens) without any of the above theory. The OT 2 materials reference using the CC insturction booklet (below), so that was always included on the OT 2 theory checksheet for reference (and sometimes it included the CC film as well), but none of the GPM background data was given to the OT 2 students. As a result, many OT 2 students were very confused. Sometimes the OT 2 supervisor kept a transcript of the above tapes (pattern of the bank etc.) handy to pull out and show to them even though it wasn't on the OT 2 checksheet. 07424 > R6EW Triples > Commands > The Bank The modern grade 6 process. 7505 > CLEARING COURSE INSTRUCTION BOOKLET > Mechanics of the Bank > Duration of Auditing > The Cause of Trouble > Basic Basic > The Pattern of the Bank > How to Use a Platen > Running Items > [Glossary] Finally the real CC instructions in full detail. 07964 > The 7s (Part A) > The Basic End Words (Part B) > The Confusion GPM (Part C) > The Objects (Parts D & E) These are the actual CC platens to be run. 08678 > LIST 7 CORRECTED And this is the CC and OT2 correction list in case you get in trouble. 08804 > SECRETARIAL TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ; Washington, DC > #447 ; RON'S INSTRUCTIONS ; 23 November 1963 > [1963; L. Ron Hubbard] > [Kennedy... could have prevented it if the government had not been > fighting meters.] This is what is called a SecED which is an operational order of short duration (unless extended). All the orgs issued these on a regular basis for ordinary day to day management. The ones issued by Ron were considered special and eventually these became LRHEDs and took on greater longevity. The later LRHEDs which were retained were collected into what are now called the "Blue Volumes" (like the Red (HCOB) and green (HCOPL) volumes, because the EDs were printed in blue). 08890 > HCO ETHICS ORDER ; No. 30 INT > E/O No. 28 INT added to > RACKET EXPOSED ; 6th March 1968 > [1968; L. Ron Hubbard] > [...declared Suppressive .... use Auditing Process R2-45.] 8951 > OPERATIONS OFFICER > [Re: Successful and Unsuccessful Actions ; 9 March 1970] > [1970; ? and Mo Budlong] > [Successful... Direct theft of documents.] 09147 > NEW ERA DIANETICS FOR OT's > NEW ERA DIANETICS FOR OT's > NOTS DRUG RUNDOWN > NOTS REPAIR LIST > REMEDIES This is a summary of how to run NOTs. It looks good but it might not be "orthodox". It is probably a freezone writeup. 09597 > BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN ; 3 MARCH 1977 > CLASSIFIED CONFESSIONAL > [Have you ever had unkind thoughts about Mary Sue?] By Midshipman Anne Rosenblum (CMO) & Paulette Ausley, LRH Tech Expeditor, Approved by L. RON HUBBARD This might have been the major confessional that they started running on everybody before allowing them onto upper levels in the late 1970s. If its the one I'm thinking of, you got it run once, at the point when you tried to route onto your next action at AO or Flag. And they also did a "Joburg" confessional at that point. Thereafter, a much shorter quickie confessional was used on all upper level PCs whenever they routed back on after being off lines for more than 6 months (or done every 6 months as in the Solo Nots 6 month checks). 09939 > HCO BULLETIN OF MARCH 30, 1960 > INTERROGATION > [1960; L. Ron Hubbard] > [How to read an E-Meter on a silent subject] In old tech vol 4 on pages 59-60. 10069 > FLAG OPERATIONS LIAISON OFFICE ; WESTERN US > EO 741 FLWUS ; 17 OCTOBER 1973 > FINDINGS OF FITNESS BOARD ; JOHNNY BAASKA > [John, age 7... found unfit... DO NOT RELEASE TO NON-SCIENTOLOGISTS...] by Patrick McCullough, A/Fitness Board Chairman, for W/O Susan Walker, Mission PEP I/C, FMO 1167R (A = Acting, W/O = Warrent Officer, I/C = In Charge) 10131 > HCO BULLETIN OF JULY 14, AD13 > ROUTINE 3N ; LINE PLOTS > [1963; L. Ron Hubbard] > THE AIRCRAFT DOOR GOALS > THE GORILLA GOALS > THE BEAR GOALS > THE BLACK THETAN GOALS > THE INVISIBLE PICTURE GOALS > PROGRAMMING > LATER DAY IMPLANTS This bulletin was confidential when the old set of tech volumes was issued and was therefore omitted, but it was declassified thereafter and appears in new tech vol 7 pages 225-229. 10370 > HCO BULLETIN OF JULY 24, AD13 > R3N ; CORRECTIONS > [1963; L. Ron Hubbard] > LINE PLOT RI > DATE CHANGES > FALSE PICTURE IMPLANTS > THE LENGTH OF TRACK This one is apparently still confidential (even though it is mostly a correction to the 14 July bulletin above) and is omitted from both the old and the new tech volumes. (the above 2 bulletins are then repeated a second time in the scamizdat post). 10861 > HCO BULLETIN OF 22 MARCH 1967 > (Also issued as HCO PL 25 Jan. 81 V, AKH Series 14, same title.) > IMPORTANT ; ADMIN KNOW-HOW ; ALTER-IS AND DEGRADED BEINGS > [1970; L. Ron Hubbard] Old tech vol 6 pages 193-4. 10969 > HCO Ethics Order > Subject: Suppressive Person > [1965] > [...failed to handle or to disconnect from his wife... questioned tobacco... Ralph Glaser declared suppressive by John H Higginbottom, Jr. 11037 > HCO BULLETIN OF 30 NOVEMBER 1978 > CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] 11447 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1961RB > REVISED 22 OCTOBER 1980 > PROCESSING CONFESSIONAL > [1980] > [Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Mary Sue?] 11717 > HCO BULLETIN OF 14 NOVEMBER 1978 > NED for OTs Series 34 > THE SEQUENCE FOR HANDLING A PHYSICAL CONDITION > [1978; L. Ron Hubbard] > Step One -- The Item > Step Two -- The Body Part > Step Three -- Illness > Step Four -- Cures for Illness > Step Five -- Protest of Cures for the Illness > Step Six -- Body Part > Step Seven -- Item > Step Eight -- Illness on It This one is also in the Nots set at 05162 above. 11850 > HCO BULLETIN OF AUGUST 24, AD13 > ROUTINE 3N ; SCIENTOLOGY FOUR ; THE TRAIN GPMs > THE MARKAB BETWEEN LIVES IMPLANTS > [1963; L. Ron Hubbard] > THE TRAIN GOALS > [The Implanting is done from a huge train station.] > THE BETWEEN LIVES IMPLANT Another one that was confidential and later declassified. It is is new tech vol 7 on pages 281-286. 12190 > HCO BULLETIN OF FEBRUARY 19, 1964 > SCIENTOLOGY V > [1964; L. Ron Hubbard] This one begins with "(Taken from HCO Bulletin of Sept. 28, 1963)". Again, these were once confidential but are no longer. The new tech vol 7 does not have this bulletin, but it has the more complete HCOB of 28 Sept 63 titled "Actual Goals". The bulletin of 19 Feb in the scamizdat pack is the first half of the earlier HCOB, verbatim. The 2nd half of the earlier bulletin contains details on auditing the GPM process known as R4M2. 12277 > HCO BULLETIN OF APRIL 17, AD13 ; R3 - M2 > [1963; L. Ron Hubbard] > A COMPLETE GPM PATTERN > PATTERN OF A VERB GOAL > POINTS OF INTEREST > LINE PLOT This one should have been included in new tech vol 7 but it was omitted because the idiots who compiled the book had a misunderstood. This implant platen was cancelled by HCOB 28 Apr 63, which gives a different implant platen. That is why they omitted it. They neglected to notice that that HCOB 14 Jul 63 (at 10131 above) uses this 17 Apr line plot for certain implants. Back in April of 1963, Ron was looking for the one right pattern, and by July he was collecting different patterns for a multitude of different implants. 12534 > HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY 1980 > CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY > [1980; L. Ron Hubbard] 12681 > HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1980 > PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR > [1980; L. Ron Hubbard] 12767 > Extracts from LRH tape 6308C06 SHSpec-291 > "Auditing Comm Cycles" > [Story of the Markab Confederacy] This tape has always been on Level 0 training. Some auditors and most public haven't heard things like the between lives implant tape, but they do hear this one, so it would have been a better one to play for Miscaviage because lots of Scientologists would recognize it. 12849 > HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 JUNE 1961 > SEC CHECK WHOLE TRACK ; (HCO WW Sec Form 4) > [1961; L. Ron Hubbard] > [Have you ever enslaved a population?] Old tech vol 4 pages 337-346. 13239 > [STEVEN FISHMAN DOCUMENT] > [1993; US District Court Central District California] > DECLARATION OF STEVEN FISHMAN Note that from here on the scamizdat post contains the Fishman materials that are also available at various Fishman sites on the net. 13599 > Exhibit A - PROOF OF SERVICE > Exhibit B - ON CONTROL AND LYING > [L. Ron Hubbard] > Exhibit C - WITNESS PREPARATION:HATTING THE WITNESS > [1982; L. Ron Hubbard] > Exhibit D - CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT ; HATTING > [1982] > Exhibit E - PROJECT QUAKER > [To ensure... staff... not available for questioning...] > Exhibit G - MAGAZINE ARTICLED ON LEVEL 0 ; CHECKSHEET > [L. Ron Hubbard] > Dissemination of Material > Exhibit F - [OPERATING THETAN] 14823 > OT I > [L. Ron Hubbard] > Earliest OT [I] This is the one that begins with "1. On an E-Meter, find the last 3,000 years of lifetimes.". According to rumor, this is what was used very briefly as the first OT 1, and was immediately bumped and became the 1st OT 4 (again briefly). Again based on rumor, this is probably the foundation of what is now being delivered as OT 8 on the Freewinds. 14855 > Second OT I This is the one that begins with "(a) Route I: The entire 15 steps as listed in "Creation of Human Ability". This is probably accurate, and again was probably only used briefly. The later original OT 5 and 6 are this kind of processing and may have been intended as an upgraded replacement for doing CofHA Route 1. 14874 > Third OT I This one is the single command "Spot a person". I'm not sure if it is accurate or not. It could be correct as a forerunner of the later "count bodies" etc. version of OT 1. Note that all of these are early experimental OT 1s which did not last very long, and there is yet another early OT 1 (referred to as a "clearing course repeat") which ended up as the 1970s OT 4 (see below). These early versions (from the 1965-8 era) were replaced by the 27 July 68 version that consists of 13 steps ("count bodies" etc.) done outdoors. That one remained as The OT 1 level throughout the 1970s, but rumor has it that it has been replaced in later years (after release of the Sunshine rundown). These later OT 1s are not in the Fishman materials but the "count bodies" one has been available elsewhere on the net (see below). 14892 > OT COURSE - SECTION TWO > [1967; L. Ron Hubbard] > INSTRUCTIONS > WHOLE TRACK TABLE This is the introduction and table of contents for OT 2. The whole track table lists the 15 chapters that are to be run (each chapter is an implant platen). More introductory info is above at 6196, and also see the CC instruction booklet (also above). Note that the following are the full platens for chapters 1-3. For the rest of the OT 2 chapters, see above. If I remember correctly, there was a bit more introductory material (not very much) on OT 2 in the 1970s. 14986 > THE ELECTRICAL GPM > ELECTRICAL GPM OT 2 Chapter 1. 15035 > TOCKY GPM OT 2 chapter 2. 15060 > BIG BEING GPM OT 2 Chapter 3. 15126 > THE HOUSE GPM This is only the introduction to OT 2 chapter 4. The full platen is at 6227 above and see that portion of the scamizdat post for the remaining chapters. 15140 > O.T. COURSE - PART ONE > [1966; L. Ron Hubbard] > THE ARROW > WOMAN > WHITE BLACK SPHERE > HOT COLD > LAUGHTER - CALM > DANCE MOB > O.T. COURSE PART ONE B > DOUBLE ROD > THE BB GPM'S > FOREIGN LANGUAGE CAUTION > THE LOWER BANK These are early and/or incomplete versions of OT 2 chapters 8, 9, and 15. See the full versions earlier in the scamizdat post. 15326 > OPERATING THETAN ; Section Three > [The story of Xenu] > Character of Body Thetans > Sequence of Incident II for thetans on another planet > The Basics on BTs > Instructions > Cross Auditing > Overrun on ITT > Running OT III > OT III Errors > Cluster Formation - Cumulative > Further III remedies > Rudiments Going Out On BT's > OT III Auditing > List of Volcanos > Incident II > Incident I The above are the "handwritten" OT 3 instructions, which was the long original writeup, plus the actual "platens" for incident 1 and incident 2 including the list of volcanos. The level always included the "handwritten" instructions, sometimes with as a mimeo or photocopy of the handwriting, and sometimes typed up. Not included here are a slew of "secret" HCOBs that came out subsequently to clarify or expand the level. The most noteable was "Cumulative Cluster Formation". Later tech was generally to use cumulative cluster (assess for what kind of incident and run that instead of just assuming that it was incident 2) rather than the earlier approach. I'm not sure if the cumulative cluster bulletin is on the net, if you can't find it, see Filbert's Excalibur Revisited for his description of the technique (originally called the Milazzo rundown). Note that OT 3 bulletins said "Secret" rather than "Confidential" which had been used on the lower confidential levels, implying that there were 2 major classifications of confidential materials. 16026 > OT IV RUNDOWN ; Non-Solo This describes the use of the audited section of OT 4, the actual list of what to audit is below at 16113. 16079 > OT IV SOLO > [1978] > [...HANDLE UNTIL HE DOES GO EXTERIOR...] This is the solo section of OT 4. This is the "clearing course" repeat which was very briefly one of the versions of OT 1 before being bumped up to OT 4. This is basically the 2nd OT 4, with the original OT 1 having very briefly been the 1st OT 4 before it was bumped as being too difficult. By the late 1970s, this version of OT 4 had expanded slightly with some extra steps to do while fooling around with the clearing course materials. Also, I seem to recall that a few of the steps of what is in here as the 2nd OT 1 (such as the step of "mocking up heat") were also added to the end of this OT 4. This remained as OT 4 until the NOTS OT level renumbering. This or an expanded version of it will probably be the new OT 9 when they get around to releasing it. 16113 At this point the steps of the audited section of OT 4 are listed begining with "(1) Rudiments or GF (Green Form) to F/N". This was basically a rehab of earlier levels followed by the "7 CASES" handling if necessary. Note that none of these actions was really confidential. The "7 CASES" referes to the "7 Resistive Cases" (1968) which was then renamed "7 Special Cases" (1969) and which later ended up as GF (Green Form) section 40, which is the name that most auditors will recognize it by. It is in the tech volumes under that name. The use of the term "7 Cases" implies that this is a 1968-9 version of OT 4. This audited step was mainly a repair action and almost disappeared after expanded grades were released, becoming just a simple check over before letting the person go onto the solo section of OT 4. 16131 > OT V ; CAUSE OVER MEST > Gain Freedom from Fixated ; Introversion into MEST > [Locate an object, draw energy from it into you.] 16266 > OT VI > [...exteriorized visit a friend who lives in another state.] These are the old OT 5 and 6 which remained in use until the OT level renumbering due to NOTS. These are early versions, later ones used in the 1970s had a few more processes added, unfortunately I don't remember exactly which ones, but everything on these levels is in the style of CofHA route 1 and there are hundreds of processes of this type back in the 1950s. New OT 10 and 11 will probably be re-issues of these levels, hopefully expanded considerably by adding in tons more OT drills from the 1950s. 16333 > OT VII RUNDOWN > [1979] > [Find some plants, trees, etc., and communicate to them...] This says it is the "June 1979 Revision". It looks correct but it may be a bit more extensive than the version I did. It is probably the final version of old OT 7 before the NOTs OT level renumbering. Note that NOTS was in use for awhile before the renumbering which bumped the old OT levels and replaced them with the NOTS levels. 16630 At this point is another statement of the Fishman case. 16852 > OT VIII ; HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1969 ; SECRET > [1969; L. Ron Hubbard] > WHY THETANS MOCK UP > [This is the road to returned personal power in the Physical > Universe.] This is labled as OT 8 HCOB of 1 Oct 69. It might be an authentic OT 8 HCOB from the early days when Ron was imagining a final super level after old OT 7. This seems like one bulletin out of what would have been a pack of bulletins outlining a major theory (like getting just one of the Nots HCOBs from the middle of the set). If this is authentic, I would suspect that one of the OT 8 HCOBs that Ron was putting together was passed around to some of the Class 8s to generate enthusiasm. The timeframe (1969) is right. In this period, he was still imagining a quicky series of OT levels. With the advent of expanded grades in 1970, that all went by the boards as the tech was significantly restructured, and it wasn't long before he was talking in terms of needing about 24 OT levels to make it. This one bears no relationship to any other OT level or version of "OT 8" that is floating around, but it might be part of the level that Ron never quite got into shape for release but kept promising as his ultimate. Or maybe its yet another freezone construction. 16991 > OT VIII Series I ; HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MAY 1980 > [1980; L. Ron Hubbard] > STUDENT BRIEFING > [Jesus... In addition to being a lover of young boys and men...] This one really doesn't sound authentic. My guess would be that it is some freezone attempt at putting together an OT 8 in an immitation Ron like style. > > ====================== END ========================= 17696 (after PGP signature). ===== Scamizdat 11 contained everything that was in any of the earlier Scamizdats ( 0 and 3 to 10, as listed at the Scamizdat website) with the following exceptions. The later OT 1 of 27 July 68 mentioned in my commentary at 14874 above was in Scamizdat 3 and repeated in number 5 and again in number 8 but was left out of number 11. But it has appeared separately at various times and was up at Operation Clambake at some point. SCAMIZDAT 6 of 29 May 1995 also included a complete copy of the LA Times articles. SCAMIZDAT 9 of 12 July 1995 also included > SCIENTOLOGY: A HISTORY OF MAN ; by L. Ron Hubbard > A LIST AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL INCIDENTS TO BE > FOUND IN A HUMAN BEING > (Formerly printed in limited manuscript edition under > the title 'WHAT TO AUDIT') > [1952; L. Ron Hubbard] > [The entire book] [Clams, Piltdown Man] === Other Sets of Materials - A full Nots auditors pack is all over the net. Super Power was posted, begining with: EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE LRH ED 301 INT 17 December 1978 RON'S JOURNAL 30, 1978 - THE YEAR OF LIGHTNING FAST NEW TECH, And then continuing with various confidential materials such as THE CONDITION BELOW CONFUSION. There is a set of L10 to L12 materials. They look like a freezone reconstruction rather than the originals. I believe that there was a transcript of the "Between Lives Implants" tape (July 23, 1963, SHSBC-288 in the old numbering system) and "The Helatrobus Implants" tape (21 May 63 SHSBC-266). These were once confidential but were declassified and added back onto the briefing course. Somebody began posting tech volume 1 with subject line "From the Red Volumes (1/?)" 2/?, 3/?, etc. === Quite a few other HCOBs have been on the net. Most or all of these were on Operation Clambake's "HCOBS Etc." page among other places. > HCO BULLETIN OF MAY 11, AD13 - ROUTINE 3, HEAVEN This is a portion of the 1963 materials on Helatrobus > HCOB 21SEP70 - LP-1 > The power processing correction list. > > HCOB 11SEP68 - DATA ON PR PRs > > HCOB 06JUN66 - POWER PLUS RELEASE - 5A PROCESSES > > GRADE V POWER PROCESSES ALL FLOWS > A command sheet. > > HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTETMBER 1968 - REHAB OF VA See also the grade 5 power materials in Scamizdat 11 above. > HCO BULLETIN OF JANUARY 4, 1965 - R6 EW, R6 EWS, R6 EWP CORRECTION > > HCO BULLETIN OF DECEMBER 8, 1964 - SOLO AUDITING AND R6 EW > > HCOB 13MAY65 - LIST 6 EW This is the correction list for R6EW. Also see the R6 stuff in Scam 11 above. > HCO Bulletin of 16 November 1981 - THE SUNSHINE RUNDOWN, INSTRUCTIONS I haven't done the sunshine rundown, but this bulleting sounds authentic. > HCOB Sep 23rd, 1968, Class VIII Confidential - > RESISTIVE CASES, FORMER THERAPY > > HCOB 02DEC74 Flag Only - DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT > > HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1974RA, REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1974, > REVISED 1 NOVEMBER 1974, THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973! > THE INTROSPECTION RD (Changes HCO B 23 Jan 1974, "The Introspection RD".) > > HCOB 12OCT69RB - LDN OT III RB This is the OT 3 correction list. > HCOB 24SEP78 - THE STATE OF CLEAR (confidential) This is the clear definition that was issued for dianetic clear. > HCO BULLETIN OF 2 NOVEMBER 1978R, REVISED 10 DECEMBER 1978 - > DIANETICS DELETED FROM OT III MATERIALS ================= Except for the Scamizdat 11 index, I've pretty much limited this to confidential tech (rather than policy) and I'm sure that I've missed some. However, there are some things missing. As far as what public might see while doing the OT levels, the things missing are: a) The clearing course film transcript. b) The Green Green Form (another OT 3 & above correction list). c) Some of the OT 3 HCOBs. d) Chapters 13 & 14 of OT 2. e) The handful of Solo Nots HCOBs f) The actual materials of new OT 8 as delivered on the Freewinds. g) A few HCOBs on solo auditing Note that e), f), and g) have been described in various posts. Also, public sometimes got to hear hard to get (but not actually confidential) SHSBC tapes giving the general theory of GPMs and similar materials, and the Solo Nots course included some of the Class 8 tapes. The biggest lack on the auditor's side are transcripts of the Class 8 tapes (except for the excerpt from the assist tape) and HCOBs on C/Sing upper levels (the Solo C/S course pack). And the official L10 to L12 materials. And then there are obscure things like the Staff Clearing lectures and various tapes that they have been dropping out of the 1950s materials. Hope this helps, The Pilot ========================================== The following trailer was used on all of these posts ------------------ The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net. See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm Some translations are available, see In German - http://www.cso.net/mt/pilot.htm In Russian - http://www.user.cityline.ru/~cisergem/ All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives #25 and #26 and posted to ACT. See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG. Note that some of my posts only go to ACT. I cannot be reached by email. I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line. ------------------