Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 19 - JAN 9, 1998 PILOT POSTS TO ARS
Date: 9 Jan 1998 14:00:35
POST19.txt
SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 19 - JAN 9, 1998 PILOT POSTS TO ARS
see also post20.txt containing the posts to ACT
==========================================
Contents:
subj : Super Scio - FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW
subj : Super Scio - HEBER Was BRILLIANT
subj : Super Scio - Web Page Error
subj : Super Scio - OUTING XENU
subj : Super Scio - Scientology Funerals
subj : Super Scio - To Justin About Religion
subj : Super Scio - More To Klaus On Testing
subj : Super Scio - Plugging Away At All Fronts (Attn Hartley)
subj : Super Scio - Jerry Seinfield
subj : Super Scio - More On King In Yellow
subj : Super Scio - Answering Anthony on the rhyme
subj : Super Scio - Who'se Who (attn Bob or Martin)
subj : Super Scio - WEB BRIDGE
subj : Super Scio Tech - Working the Self Clearing Book
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW
FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW
It is all coming to a boil.
The sharks are moving in for the kill.
When the CofS picketed the Clearwater police in a stupid
attempt to handle the Lisa picket in December, they shot
a foot bullet which hit an artery.
They have been accumulating bad karma for years. Or from
another view, they have kept many of the newsrooms afraid
of their courtroom harrassment and the resentment of that
has had much time to grow.
But the New York Times ran the Lisa story. I suspect that
the CofS counter picket is what pushed it over the edge.
And the CofS legal staff and funding has been strained
handling the endless copyright violations on the internet.
And so others, who might have been holding back out of
fear, decided that now was the time because the CofS already
had its hands full.
So 60 Minutes, Extra, and The Wall St. Journal came pounding
in, one, two, three on the CAN, Lisa, and IRS situations
respectively.
Now Public Eye just hit and there is a promise of more
from CBS. They are unleasing everything in their arsenal
on the premise that the CofS legal harrassment fund will
be too drained to counter attack as they have in the past.
Now it is a feeding frenzy and every newsroom that has
ever been intimidated by the CofS into keeping a story
on the shelf will dust it off and release it.
Each wolf fears to strike the first blow, but once
the prey is bleeding, all move in for the kill.
These are the final days of the CofS, at least in the
form that we have known it.
It might still reform, although that time window is closing.
It might just shatter. In either case, something will
remain, but it will not be what has existed before.
But the Freezone story has not yet hit the big news.
And it is very important that it do so NOW while every
newsroom is hot for material and unafraid of CofS
retaliation.
Some of you have struggled in court. Many of you have
rightly feared dead agenting. It was always the big
monster overwhelming the little guy. You might rightly
have steared clear of the church and feared publicity.
But it is different now.
And there is an important reason for telling the Freezone
story.
It is a matter of religious persecution and the freedom
to have the religious scriptures necessary to one's faith.
You cannot assume that the materials will be set free
by a CofS collapse. It is quite possible that they
will end up in the hands of a fanatical and ingrown
Author Aervices that does not print them anymore but
who does practice ritual sueing.
Or somebody who wants to ensure that there will be
no more fanaticism might outbid you at a bankruptcy
sale and then suppress them with the aid of copyrights.
Or some profit oriented click might get control and
and play yet another set of profiteering games with them.
The only safe course is to break the copyrights on
the basis of these being religious scriptures and
launch them into the public domain. Not just the
NOTS or the secret stuff but all of it.
I did not begrudge Ron his royalties as an author.
But he is gone. His family are already provided for
and do not see any of the profits.
The organization has brought on its own downfall, but
if it hadn't, their members would buy the official
editions in support of their church so they are not
directly hurt by others reproducting their own materials.
In fact, the organization would not sell to "squirrels"
anyway, so there is not even a potential loss of sales.
This is the one special time when there might be so
much popular support and so much news exposure that
the religious persecution and the use of copyrights
to suppress freedom of religion might in fact be
brought to light and handled.
WHAT YOU SHOULD DO NOW, TODAY, IS TO START EMAILING
EVERY NEWSROOM IN THE US AND OTHER COUNTRIES ABOUT THE
FREEZONE STORY.
This is simple and safe. You do not have to put
yourself in reach of their last few courtroom death
throes. Just get the newspeople on it.
But GET THEM ON IT NOW. They might not listen later.
What is the freezone story?
It is very simple.
One believes in the tech. One wishes to practice
one's religion in peace and harmony. One wishes
to own and apply copies of the holy scriptures
known as the LRH materials.
One does not like the mother church. One disagrees
with how it behaves. One wishes to practice
independently or form a separate organization.
One does not wish to obey the RTC or the Sea Org.
And then one is not only sued on copyright violations,
but one is attacked and harrased at every turn.
The analogy is that of the Catholics holding
a copyright to the Holy Bible and preventing
the Lutherans from practicing their faith or
reproducing their holy scriptures.
And include a bunch of URLs for various freezone
sites such as fza.org and lightlink.com so that
the newspeople have somewhere to start from.
And if you're ambitious, write a history of
freezone harrassment and get it up on the web.
And there are some other good writers who have
been putting out reformation stuff recently.
Maybe somebody should web that and call attention
to it.
I'm not providing a literal minded email for
you to copy because this is freezone. Each
individual moves in his own way towards the
target rather than marching in ranks. We should
not look like Justin the spam clam.
For now, just get it into the media. Things
will escallate. This may be critical groundwork
for later.
I am saving my anonymousness for later. And I do
love to see OSA scurrying and PTS to who I might be.
But I will come out in the open if a point of maximum
impact presents itself.
This is happening faster than I expected. I had
thought that the self clearing book would have
a year to work its way into the orgs and errode
the foundations.
It might still happen that way. Maybe the attacks
will die down or the org will find a way to gain
a brief respite. But I don't think so. It looks
like the whole house of cards is about to tumble.
And if it does fall, the freezone has to be
positioned and visible, not only to free the
materials from religious persecution, but also
to give hope and alternatives to the membership
who will otherwise feel like the Christians
under Nero.
Yours in Total Freedom,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - HEBER Was BRILLIANT
HEBER WAS BRILLIANT
There has been some criticism of Heber's masterful handling
of the Public Eye broadcast on Lisa which appeared on CBS on
Wednesday night.
Let me present the real situation.
----------
The only effective way to have handled it would have been to
state openly that Flag was full of stupid fanatics who had
gotten out of hand and that policies would be established
immediately to ensure that such a situation would never happen
again.
And also to quote Hubbard and point out that he says in
the Case Supervisor series that a C/S must NOT GO ON HOPEING
if a rundown was not working. In other words, an intelligent
and properly trained C/S is NOT supposed to leave a poor girl
on a stupid rundown that was not working for 17 goddamn days
even if Ron himself had ordered it personally.
And also to commiserate with the family for the incredible
and unbelievable lack of compassion shown by the people
who handled Lisa.
But he couldn't say this kind of stuff because then he'd
be committed to changing policy and reforming the church
and Miscaviage would have his balls for breakfast.
-----------
Given the above constraint, namely that there was no way
to be honest or handle the situation properly, Heber did
the best that he could.
1) He ranted about psychs instead of lying outright on TV.
2) He ranted enough to fill up the time so that the
newsman would not ask yet another intelligent and probing
question.
3) He put attention on himself as a fanatical idiot and
drew it away from the real fanatical idiots who handled
Lisa. After all, the court case is about Lisa, so he
is just drawing fire.
4) The "wog" public opinion was in the toilet anyway. There
was no way that Heber was going to save the day because the
earlier part of the show was too damning. So it didn't
matter if he looked bad to the "wogs".
5) But after the first half, ten thousand Scientologists
might have walked out the door on the spot. And he recovered
them by putting their attention on the evil psychs.
Number 5 was his real victory. Its the idea that all airlines
have plane crashes, but some have better safety records
than others. He got the Scientologists in the audience
to stop and think about how many more people have been
damaged by psychs than have been damaged by Flag. That
doesn't really justify anything, but it works, at least
with people who are clutching at straws and want very hard
to believe.
I know that this worked because I watched other Scientologists
watching the show and there was a dramatic shift from dark
dispair to renewed confidence in Flag as he did his rant.
I can't see how anybody could have done better given the
constraints that he was working under (truth is forbidden
and you must prevent the Scientologists from blowing en mass).
And I don't think that he is an idiot or was out of control.
The speach was well rehearsed.
----------
As to Rinder, he was terrible. He had obviously been bullbaited
extensively and was acting like he was still in a bullbaiting
session.
His TRs were robotic crap. He really was pretending that he
was being bullbaited rather than on real TV because he almost
cracked up when they pushed a hot button on him.
That wasn't a wink or twitch. Didn't you notice the gleam
in his eye. It was suppressed laughter. Not nasty evil
laughter but the ultra nervous laughter of somebody who has
been caught with his hand in the till. You get that in
bullbaiting all the time.
Ask Dennis Erlich, I'm sure he'll spot it if he looks
at the videotape closely. I've seen it in bullbaiting
a hundred times. One tiny extra push and the person is
on the floor in hysterical laughter.
If the interviewer had simply smiled and said "gottcha",
we would have been treated to the spectacle of Rinder
giggling helplessly and hysterically, unable to control
himself.
-----------
As to Heber, I think that he is a man of good intentions,
and that he was once a man of integrity until his soul was
corrupted by the continual need to hide the truth.
To take a man and put their goodness and their honesty into
such terrible opposition that the one destroys the other
is damning in and of itself and speaks volumes about the
sickness that is currently rampant within the CofS.
Right now he is Captain of the Titanic.
I haven't seen the movie yet, but based on the A&E
documentary, we could assign the following hats -
Captain = Heber
Designer (the technical guy) = Mithoff
Owner = Miscaviage.
As I understand it, the owner demanded speed irrespective of
safty for the purpose of PR and the foolish Captain complied.
The Designer wanted to add more lifeboats and even designed
the addition but the owner said that it would cost too much.
All 3 were on board. Guess which one got off in a lifeboat
ahead of all the women and children? In fact, a lifeboat
that only contained a few people.
Yup, you've got it right. Miscaviage is the correct answer.
----------
If you are reading this Heber, please take a look around.
Notice that big looming mass off to the port side.
Notice that the guts have already been ripped out of
the ship.
And take a good look at who is getting on that lifeboat
that is preparing to launch.
ARC,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Web Page Error
WEB PAGE ERROR
Mea Culpa. Much appologies.
I was working too fast getting out that huge volume of material
during December (and working a regular job and engaging in
Christmas cheer) and a bug slipped into the Self Clearing
Webpage that I posted.
All that is missing is a single quotation mark on what was
line 223 of the original post that contained the web page.
Here is the section that contains the error -
----
The Self Clearing Book has been made freely available on
the internet. It can be picked up from the following
sites among others:
----
The bad line is
Notice the quote mark after selfclear.gz which needs to be added to
the page that is up on the web.
The result is that the text and the following link to joecisar's site
all become part of the link to uni-wuerzberg and the on screen text
identification appears to reference joecisar but it links to
uni-wuerzberg.
If you display the source text in Netscape, the line in error
will be blinking. Note that the browsers will still display
the page and it works properly except for this one bad link.
Sorry,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - OUTING XENU
OUTING XENU
On 30 Dec 97, Monica Pignotti
wrote on subject "Re- 60 Minutes did more than ARS realizes..."
> DavisS wrote:
> >
> > Keep in mind; Xenu has never been outed before. The Intergalactic Alien
> > connection has NEVER EVER been publicly broadcast on this scale.
>
> Xenu was very elaborately outed on the BBC over 10 years ago. They did
> a whole animated portrayl of Incident 2 as part of their exposee on
> Scientology. It was very cute. Xenu has also been outed in the Time
> Magazine article and the LA Times series on the CofS. After the Time
> Magazine article came out, Scientologists were reporting reading the
> article and "caving in". Funny thing was that it didn't have the
> slightest effect on any of the wogs that read it. Xenu's been out of
> his mountain trap for a long time now.
>
> Monica Pignotti
Scientologists often don't read the newspapers ("wog entheta").
Although they managed to get SO staff to stop watching TV, they
haven't managed to do that with the Scientology public (at least
not yet).
I think that the BBC show must have had a lot of impact in
the UK. Saint Hill was the third largest CofS stronghold in the
world. What is it now?
Among Scientology OTs, broad public exposure of Xenu/Xemu without
any resulting mass pneumonia or whatever forces them to wakeup
and rethink the entire business. In the US, broad public exposure
means something like the 60 minutes show.
He has been outed before, but this is the big one in the US.
Its only too bad that they didn't also show the BBC's Xenu cartoon.
HBO's America Undercover often has shows that are jointly
produced with BBC channel 4. Maybe you could write them and
suggest that they show some of the British material.
I personally don't think that the Xenu business invalidates
the tech, its just one stupid incident. But it totally invalidates
the blind fanatical mindset, the confindentiality, the ridgid
rules, and the entire operating basis of the Sea Org.
With Xenu outed, there is no way to keep the literal minded
worship of Ron's words. Either they learn to think and pick
and choose, which immediate makes them freezone or reformers,
or they say the hell with it all and bail out completely.
If they had not been suppressive to the use and availability
of the tech, if they had not blocked all further research, if
they had not attacked everything that moved, if they had not
abused and exploited their own membership, if they had
simply sat quietly in their own little world of fanaticism,
they could have been ignored and allowed to wallow in their
foolishness.
Instead they had to specialize in commiting overts, and now
the motivators are coming home to roost.
With Xenu, their stupidity is brought to light.
With Lisa, their cruelty is brought to light.
And with free self clearing, they are shown that they can have
the tech without the sacrifices.
These 3 all culminated in December. It takes time for the word
to spread, especially among staff who will only hear of things
indirectly.
I give it 3 months. One month to achieve strong word of mouth
within the organization. A second month for staff to think things
through and start talking amongst themselves. And a third month
for them to get in motion and do something.
At a guess, I would say about March 21st.
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Scientology Funerals
SCIENTOLOGY FUNERALS
========
Although cremation is common, and Ron recommends it in
Hymn of Asia, it is not required.
There is an expectation that the thetan will remain
around the body until it is disposed of (cremated or
burried) and therefore will hear the service. This
is similar to the Tibetan belief whereby they read
the Book of the Dead to the body as part of the
funeral rites.
Note that the Scientology funeral service is primarily
addressed to the thetan who has died rather than to
the congregation attending the service.
In all Scientology ceremonies, the music is choosen
by the participants (the people being married or
whatever) rather than by the minister. In the case
of a funeral, it would either be the previously
expressed wish of the deceased or, if none were
specified, the choice of his surviving relatives.
Also note that Scientologists are not required to use
the funeral service written by Ron, but it is the one
generally used.
========
"Death" Lecture 12 of the 18th ACC given on 30 July 1957.
..
"What happens to him when he dies?
Well, basically all that happens is that a separation occurs
between the thetan and the body. That's basically all that
happens.
He, however, takes with him old tin cans and rattling chains
and bric-a-brac and other energy phenomena that he feels he
cannot do without and stashes this in the next body that he
picks up.
..
Now a thetan doesn't much care concerning the actual disposition
of the body as long as it isn't given any more indignity than
it suffered in the lifetime. But he is apt to be very upset
about indignities rendered to a dead body.
..
He associates the body with his own identity to the degree
that every time an indignity is rendered to the body, he
thinks it is to some degree being rendered to him. Therefore
he hangs around a body until it's properly disposed of. When
people make wills in which they declare a certain disposition
of the body, it's a very, very, wise thing, if you want the
fellow to go on and live a happy life someplace else and
so forth, to carry out those wishes. I don't care what they
are.
..
And a person loses his body and after that behaves accordingly
and out of this a great mystery is made.
..
==============
The Founding Church of Scientology Funeral Service by
L. Ron Hubbard from the CofS Ceremonies book.
(Male pronouns and the name Sony have been substituted
as called for in the instructions).
Our loss
is gain in other times
our hopes on future bent
must then depend on incidents like these
for bodies wear
and in
the fine grist mill of time
are spent in service such
as yours
and go, our time by smallest time
into yesterday, werein began
the conquest of eternity
what did we know
when yesterday we wept?
what grip upon us had our ignorance
that we in our conciet did feel
that all of us were mortal here
and lives once led were spent
and wasted on our selfish selves.
How narrow is such scope
To feel that we
should be eternally
the goal of all the toil
and wretchedness
from birth to death
and like a play
the curtain dropped
and left an empty stage
How dull of us to feel that we
were all the target of this strife
and that we lived but once
and living then did reconcile
the whole in one brief life
Oh no, a wider drama here
was planned and staged
and we with narrowness of mind
did overlook the plan.
...
( about 200 more lines, gradually climbing through grief
up to higher tone levels)
..
Your people thank you for having lived
Earth is Better for your having lived
Men, women and children are alive today
Because you lived.
We thank you for coming to us.
We do not contest your
right to go away.
Your debts are paid.
This chapter of thy life is shut
Go now, dear Sony and live once more
In happier times and place.
thank you, Sony
and now all here lift up
your eyes and say to him
Goodby.
(congregation): Goodby
Goodby, our dear
Goodby.
We'll miss you, you know.
Let the body now
Draw away
To be consumed to ashes
And to dust
In earthly and in cleanly fire
To be no more, no more.
And that is done.
Come friends,
He is all right
And he is gone
We have our work
To do. And he has his.
He will be welcome there.
To Man!
===============
In Memorium Sony Bono
Respectfully,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - To Justin About Religion
TO JUSTIN ABOUT RELIGION
On 2 Jan 98, justin@directnet.com posted on
Subject "Why ARS Posters attack me"
> I am attacked because I stand up for my religion.
No you're not.
You are attacked because you make a mockery of MY religion
and commit overts with the false justification of it being
for the sake of religion.
An attack against the Spanish Inquisition would not have been
an attack against Christ or Christianity.
> They would have me cower before their lies.
Although there is the occasional unjustified rant, much of
what the critics are posting is true.
> I don't.
> And I won't.
This is good. You should not cower. Keep your TRs in.
But this means confronting what is out there rather than
Not-Ising it and trying to hid from the truth.
> Justin
I believe in the same religion that you do. I believe in
the tech. I apply it. It works for me.
I do not suffer from a lot of critical attacks. I might
get into an occasional argument, and there are critics who
will say that the tech is bullshit, but they will leave
me alone to practice it.
The only group that would not leave me alone if I were
to come out in the open and really start spreading
the tech is the CofS itself.
Think about it.
Where does the real suppression lie?
ARC,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - More To Klaus On Testing
MORE TO KLAUS ON TESTING
On 2 Jan 98, Klaus Bloemker
Subject: Re: Super Scio - To Klaus About Testing
> The Pilot wrote:
>
> ... 99.9% snipped ...
>
> > I would love to see a true test of the self clearing book.
> [Whether the tech actually improves IQ scores e.g.]
> ____________
>
> Let me just add two little items:
>
> 1.
> The variation of intelligence among people is conventionally believed
> to be 80% determined by inherited genes, 20% by learning environment.
> (If my neighbor's IQ is 10 points higher than mine, 8 points are
> accounted for by his parents having passed on their more intelligent
> genes and 2 points by having given my neighbor a more stimulating
> learning environment when he grew up. - But maybe the "tech" is
> something completely new that cancels this conventional wisdom.)
Even you said "conventionally believed" rather than proved.
At best, assuming the tests themselves were accurate (which is
also subject to debate), there are still many difficulties with
this proposition.
It is a ratio that was determined (80/20) which cannot be measured
by direct instrumentation (there is no "gene meter" that one
inserts into the subjects like a thermometer to see what part of
their IQ came from the genes). Therefore, one is dealing with
a sorting criteria (what goes on which side of the line) and
a statistical analysis of the results.
These kind of deductions easily become misleading if one has
not adequately determined all the factors involved or accidentally
introduced a bias into the criteria. If, for example, there are
three significant factors instead of two, sorting the data
into only two bins results in inaccuracy.
There are many other things that can go wrong when one
must depend on an indirect analysis instead of direct
observation. I don't mean to invalidate the work done
or the honesty of the researchers here, but only to point
out that there are many opportunities for wrong conclusions.
This is easiest to see in other more mechanical fields
where manufacturers intentionaly try to lead one to wrong
conclusions.
I occasionally become involved in computer performance testing.
There is an interesting book called "How to lie with statistics".
It deals with adjusting premises so that accurate numbers will
produce false conclusions. This occurs in the computer field
where the actual physical processes are well understood but
some manufacturer's wish to create false impressions to sell
their products.
For example, we were benchmarking some database oriented software
and the software company's benchmark showed an extremely high
performance of 100 transactions per second. On careful examination,
I determined that they had ensured that the database size fit
within the cache memory of the computer. So we increased the
database size by half again, and saw a one hundred to one
drop in performance.
Of course the manufacturer had selected this intentionally
and it was an area of known physical processes.
In an unknown area where one is attempting to deduce the
actual processes and perform statistical analysis, this
kind of bias (which can easily skew results by orders of
magnitude) can easily be introduced unintentionally simply
because there is an unidentified factor at work.
Furthermore, the "20% learning environment" is obviously
a broad generality which could never be proven at that level.
One could only show that particular kinds of learning
environments only affect IQ by 20%.
This is similar to proving that there are no airplanes
because the average speed at which people travel is less
than ten miles per hour.
In this case it is not the "tech" which is cancelling conventional
wisdom but simple weakness in the conventional wisdom itself.
If, for example, playing the music of Beethoven for children
in the nursery increased IQ, the conventional analysis would
neither have proved or disproved this unless this was a specific
criteria under study.
> 2.
> The good and bad of a new tech:
> When a pharmacy company wants to introduce a new drug (to lower blood
> pressure e.g.) the FDA requires the company to show that the new drug
> meets two criteria:
> - It has to be effective (it actually lowers the blood pressure more
> than a physician-administered placebo), and
> - The company that does the clinical testing has to show that the new
> drug's negative side effects are tolerable (it doesn't lower the
> sexual potency of males too much for that matter).
>
> What I mean is this: The new tech might in fact increase people's IQ
> (or other peronality traits) but it might make them unable to love.
>
> I am too ignorant on tech-matters to come up with any educated
> hypothesis. I just wanted to point to the two sides of a new drug/tech
> that have to be taken into consideration when testing it.
>
> Maybe there is a sponser out there that is willing to finance a clinical
> test - and in the end your self-clearing even gets FDA approval because
> it works AND has no or only negligable side effects.
> As a matter of fact, an FDA approval would also be honoured by the
> European Community and a number of other countries. That would be the
> step to really 'clear the planet'! (No ironie implied here ;-)
>
> Happy New Year - Klaus
Let us leave the matter of the FDA aside. They often attack things
which even your government considers healthful and they are
scandolus in their efforts to make vitamins illegal in the USA
(or rather, to make them into perscription drugs).
This two sided testing is a most excellent point. One must indeed
watch for negative as well as positive effects and both may be
present.
I have not personally experienced or heard of others experiencing
a decrease in either sexual potency or the ability to love due
to doing OT level processing.
But those who are harshly manhandled by ethics or abused while
working on staff do seem to me, IMHO, to have their capacity
to love (in the broad sense) significantly impared. And those
who are pounded with the new Sea Org anti-sex morality might well
suffer decreases in potency as well. Since public on upper
levels at Flag occasionally get hit with these things, there
might well be some such negative side effects due to going there
regularaly. But I would expect it to be ethics rather than
doing the levels that creates this.
I find it hard to imagine harm coming about through something
such as self clearing where there is nobody forcing the person
or applying any pressure.
But the application of many of the policies within the CofS often
have obvious and highly detrimental side effects which are
totally ignored by the membership. This is why there are so
many footbullet stories about the CofS. They have an inability
to confront the possibility that anything within the subject
might have any negative effects whatsoever.
---
By the way, I like your use of the term "backtracking". I
don't know if you coined it or whether it is a side effect
of translations between German and English but the term is
not used among US Scientologists and it has a nice ring to
it. So I thank you for suggesting this word.
Note that in Dianetics, the PC is allowed to run whatever he
finds rather than being pushed into any specific theory of
what should be found on the track. In practice I ran many
people on this and most past life incidents did not seem to
be on Earth. Unfortunately, there is no formal step to
establish the location of the incident in standard dianetics
(I think that one should be added).
And there is no correlation of what is found by the various
PCs. So there is no mapping of the backtrack beyond what is
in Hubbard's early (1952) materials.
It would be interesting to know if more than 12 percent of
the Dianetic PCs find incidents more than a few hundred
years ago on Earth. But these kind of statistics are
not calculated.
In my experience, much wishful speculation and inaccurate
recollections of being Julius Ceasar or whatever occurs
early on in processing and then tends to fade and be
discarded as a person continues to advance.
Best Regards,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Plugging Away At All Fronts (Attn Hartley)
PLUGGING AWAY AT ALL FRONTS (ATTN HARTLEY)
On 1 Jan 98, Hartley Patterson
responded to my earlier post on subject "Super Scio - THE OSA SPAM"
> The Pilot wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I don't know if free self clearing is what made OSA launch Justin or
> > whether it was the mention of ARS and Lisa in the NY Times or if
> > it was a combination of both.
> >
> > I don't think it was 60 minutes because I think that it caught
> > them totally by surprise by mentioning Xenu/Xemu. I expect that
> > they had a lot more worry about Lisa than about a CAN expose.
>
> I'd go for everything piling in at once. As organised by ARSCC of course
> (the usual deposit was made in your off-shore account). Targetting ARS
> is an old and tried method of counter-attack, the stats can be
> constructed to be up every month. Forget the German government and CBS,
> go for their Masters! Never mind that it failed the first time...
Of course. The super duper world conspiracy which tells me what
to write. The CofS knows it must be that way because OSA tells Justin
and company what to write.
I better check my mailbox for my latest assignment.
This, by the way, is why the critics on ARS and the freezoners
on ACT never argue amongst themselves or with each other. It is
all so carefully orchestrated by our secret masters.
> > I would suggest that you mention -
> >
> > a) Free Tech
> > b) Lisa MacPherson Info
> > c) Nifty Xenu Jokes
>
> Keep plugging away on all fronts in fact.
Yes.
But note that the above 3 hit the organization from inside
and raise doubts all the way up to the top.
The CAN, IRS, and German situations only hit them from outside.
The membership likes the IRS deduction and they don't want to
look a gift horse in the mouth. They think that the German
government is suppressive, and as far as CAN goes, they feel
that the org has won against a bunch of evil SPs even if it
had to do some slimy things in the process.
So these second 3 do not shake their resolve. But the first
three are killers to any loyalist. With those the organization
must either reform or crumble.
And if you add in 3 more internal footbullets, namely the
Golden Age loyalty checks, the new price increase, and
the guarantee that ethics will become more and more rabid as
the stats continue to crash, then their current postion
becomes hopeless.
They are already in check and I see a forced mate within a
few moves, depending on how much they sacrifice to buy time.
> > See the "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" by the Pilot
> > at http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/pilot.html
> > or http://www.igs.net/~michaelv/scnreform.htm or
> > via http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/good.htm or
> > The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm
> >
> > Get the original Pilot materials (the 32 part SUPER SCIO book) at:
> > ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/index.html
> > or from the Pilots Home Page or pick up the ss## files
> > from Homer's archive at lightlink.com.
> >
> > Get the new Self Clearing Book from the Pilots Home Page (above) or in
> > gzip format from ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/selfclear.gz
> > or pkzip from http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/fza1000.htm
> >
> > All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archive #18
> > and posted to ACT. The posting archives are also available
> > on The Pilots Home Page.
> >
> > Note that some of my posts only go to ACT
>
>
> --
> Hartley Patterson
> Home Page: http://village.vossnet.co.uk/h/hpttrsn/
> featuring News from Bree, medieval economics
> and an elderly universe
There are many possibilities.
1. Management could orchestrate a sane reform and turnover of
power. Miscaviage would have to be removed from control, but
he could retire gracefully and still have the Church's
protection. New policy could be issued based on various
loopholes that I have been quoting (especially on the
Reformer's homepage - those are all valid LRH quotes which
can be verified including "auditors of the world arise").
I would hope that they would follow my points for reform
because otherwise they will be back in the soup next year.
2. Or there could be an internal coup forcing the current
leadership from power. It could be gentile (Miscaviage
removed for incompetance by majority vote of the next
lower echelon) or violent (I don't advocate the use of
R2-45, but it is within the realm of possibility) or
somewhere in between (real or false testimony about Ron's
death and the forged documents etc.). Or perhaps Miscaviage
will flee as the pressure mounts.
3. Or there could be a massive splintering. Someone has suggested
that there are leagle precedents for a church (such as a CofS
org) winning the ownership of its facilities and joint use of
copyrights when it splintered from the mother church. This is
different from the previous splintering of missions into the
freezone because they would have joint use of the copyrights
and could themselves sell tech volumes and authorize NOTS
distribution over the interenet and so forth.
Or maybe the courts will step in and force them to unbundle
as happened to IBM and AT&T, which would have the same
effect as above.
4. The final choice is that they continue on in their blind
manner and successfully suppress any rebellions. In that
case I think that their tech staff will evaporate fairly
rapidly. They can't take another mass exodus like the ones
that happened with Mayo and Capt Bill, and this one will
be worse. With the far better communications provided by
the internet, and so much in the press, and Ron no longer
around, the membership will follow the tech people and
leave the org high and dry.
In that case, the official CofS will collapse into a small
fanatic organization that reads KSW (perhaps in Latin) at
their sunday services and shouts "Hip Hip Hurrah" ritually
in between prayers (called group postulates) for Ron's second
comming.
I think that its close. They certainly wouldn't last out
the century, they may not even last until Spring.
My personal pick is for March 21. Please have that duly
recorded in the ARSCC betting pool.
Regards,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Jerry Seinfield
JERRY SEINFIELD
On 31 Dec 97, esponj@aol.com (EspoNJ) asked on
subject "Jerry Seinfeld?"
> A few years back a friend of mine, with Hollywood connections, told me that
> Seinfeld was a "podhead", her term for a Scientologist. I don't think I ever
> heard this anywhere else, and his name never comes up when other celebrities
> are mentioned, as far as I've read or seen. Anyone know if it is true?
Jerry Seinfield did the communication course at the Bayshore
mission in Long Island.
Rumor has it that he had much fun joking and degrading while
doing the bullbaiting.
But when he continued this practice after finishing the course,
he was given a stern talking too.
With that, he was out the door in a flash, never to return.
And so we have his TV skit about how touchy the Scientologists are.
The CofS seems unable to resist this terrible urge to footbullet.
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - More On King In Yellow
MORE ON KING IN YELLOW
On 31 Dec 97, xenu@mindspring.com (Rob Clark) responded
to my post Super Scio - THE KING IN YELLOW "
> On 30 Dec 1997 14:00:18, pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot) wrote:
>
> >THE KING IN YELLOW
>
> >"The King in Yellow" is a facinating old horror novel from, I
> >believe, around the turn of the century or a bit thereafter.
> >It has been many years since I ready it and the author and
> >publishing date escape me, but it was apparantly so well known
> >in the thirites and forties that there are other horror stories
> >which are takeoffs on it or about people who found the true
> >underlying source behind the story.
>
> robert w. chambers was the author. lord dunsany and h. p. lovecraft,
> among many others, also adopted the notion of such works, with powers
> to drive the reader mad. jorge luis borges had a short story called
> "the zohar" about an object, which could be a coin or a tiger or a
> well or a book of which even a fleeting glimpse forever infected the
> consciousness of the viewer, eventually fully taking over the mind
> until the viewer would never again have a thought not about "the
> zohar."
>
> >The novel is about a book called The King in Yellow which drives
> >people insane when they read it. It supposedly drives them
> >insane because it describes the true underlying reality which
> >we have repressed within our subconcious or something like that.
>
> >The novel only gives vague hints about the true contents of
> >the insanity making book of the same title.
>
> >I believe that this novel was highly popular and well known
> >to L. Ron Hubbard when he wrote Excalibur.
>
> chambers was much admired by many of the pulp writers who influences
> hubbard's own writing, but chambers was more famous earlier than
> campbell's generation of pulp writers, and has been virtually unknown
> since the 30s or maybe 40s.
>
> i've read the novel. it is superior to anything else chambers ever
> wrote, which was mainly inane novels which have dated poorly.
>
> >I believe that in writing Excalibur he was trying to write
> >the true King in Yellow.
>
> he may have not even ripped it off directly from chambers, but from
> someone who ripped it off from chambers ;-)
>
> >Hence the stories of people going insane by reading Excalibur.
>
> >But it must have failed to created the desired effect (people
> >jumping out of windows and so forth as described in the
> >King in Yellow novel) or else he would never have put the
> >section on "The Mind's Protection" in DMSMH.
>
> >Despite the later legends about Excalibur, I'm sure that he
> >learned that you couldn't knock people off their rockers no
> >matter what you wrote in a book.
>
> i don't know. some of the worse hubbard-tech is enough to drive
> someone nuts who insists on "word-clearing" the whole thing, and
> other stuff arguably was intended to do just that.
Of course, but it is the word clearing or otherwise having
one person jamb something down another's throat.
Reading Class 8 stuff is not going to screw somebody up. But
doing the original Class 8 course and getting tossed over the
side of the ship every time you failed to be literal minded
enough about the Class 8 materials is a different matter
entirely.
I can imagine that somebody could be disturbed for a few days
or even have a nightmare from reading something or seeing a
movie. I can even imagine laughing so hard that you start
rolling around on the floor.
But that is all. The real loonie making activites require
active work by one person against another or the use of actual
force.
Reading about the lower conditions and penalties is not going
to put you in the looney bin. Being raked over the coals by an
Ethics officer who is applying those conditions to you is where
the real trouble comes in.
> >But I think it explains how quick he was to jump to conclusions
> >and decide that the upper levels had to be kept confidential.
> >He still had that idea of The King in Yellow deep down.
>
> >There never was any testing of whether this was really the
> >case or not. At least not until the internet. We now have
> >empirical validation that open discussion of Xenu, body thetans,
> >or implant platens does not make people sick or drive them
> >insane.
>
> >It does, however, encourage the creation of extremely funny
> >jokes.
>
> yes.
>
> >I do not believe that it is possible to write the true
> >King in Yellow.
>
> let's hope not. or that joke in the monty python skit that causes you
> to die laughing.
>
> >Best,
>
> >The Pilot
> >------------------
>
> (though the japanese appear to have cleverly invented seizure-inducing
> cartoons. tho' barney has previously in the US caused severe nausea
> and homicidal impulses among 90% of viewers.)
Reading Xenu jokes is also proven to introduce fits of hysterical
laughter. Perhaps this is psychosomatic and was part of the
implant.
- the implant is booby trapped. If anyone finds out about
it they will die laughing -
Maybe this is how the CofS will save the situation. A new
discovery that the implant contained a command to die laughing,
and the reaction can be observed although people usually live
through it because it has lost its strength over the centuries.
By the way, where are these seizure inducing cartoons? Maybe
we could make somebody look at them as a penalty for lower
conditions?
Just joking and degrading.
Thanks for the additional data about King in Yellow.
Regards,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Answering Anthony on the rhyme
ANSWERING ANTHONY ON THE RHYME
My appologies to ARS/ACT since this is a bit off topic, but
the original wasn't.
On 31 Dec, afrobert@neca.com (Anthony Roberts) responded to
my post on subject "Super Scio Humor - THE SEA ORGERS TALE"
which was a rhyme about a Sea Org member going to the RPF done
in the style of the Canterbury Tales.
> Not bad. Not bad at all. It gets pretty good toward the end, too.
>
> When you archive this, however, heed these warnings.
>
> In article ,
> pilot@hiddenplace.com wrote:
>
> > THE SEA ORGERS TALE
> [snip]
>
> > I wrote endless letters, for that was my job
> > to come get the tech, that I longed for so hard
>
> This doesn't rhyme. At least in American English. I doubt it rhymed in
> late Middle English, either. :)
It doesn't really rhyme in any form of English. It does, however,
rhyme in Marcabian.
Seriously, I know it doesn't rhyme and it was intentional. Call
it artistic license or the one intentional flaw in a Persian
carpet. It felt like a touch of dissonance was needed here.
> > But facing this man with the rage on his face,
> > MAAs at his back and me in my place,
>
> This would sound better as "...I in my place,". Not more correct, but
> more lyrical.
I agree. This is definitely an improvement.
> [snip]
>
> > Here is to joking and degrading in the New Year
> >
> > Have a Happy One,
> >
> > The Pilot
>
> Anthony
I hope that people had as much fun reading it as I had writing it.
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - Who'se Who (attn Bob or Martin)
I think I post enough here to belong in an ARS Who'se Who.
So here is an entry for Bob@Not.Here.com or for Martin if
he is still maintaining his FAQ.
The Pilot:
(annonymous, invalid email address of pilot@hiddenplace.com)
Current Member who wants to reform the CofS and is hiding from OSA.
Pro Tech and Anti Policy. Gives out insider data. Hosted by
many websites but none are in direct contact with him.
See, for example http://fza.org/pilot
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio - WEB BRIDGE
WEB BRIDGE
On Fri, 26 Dec 1997 21:57:54 -0800, Joe The Eternal
wrote on subject "Bridge On the Web Now!":
> It is time to put the whole Standard Scientology Bridge On the web and
> mirror the sites all over the earth to finally get the bridge out there
> for free.
>
> We either all make it together or we don't make it at all.
>
> Send any part of the Scientology Bridge via e-mail to me to get it up on
> the web permanently. This way the church will have to reform or close
> down.
At 03:09 AM 12/27/97 -0500, Heidrun Beer replied:
# Good luck and have fun - that's going to become quite a game!
#
# Did you already post the URL of the site where you will publish
# it all? I would link to it as a permanent reference.
#
# Heidrun Beer
Then On Sat, 27 Dec 1997 10:59:31 -0500 (EST),
VoltR@ctinet.net followed with:
% And then there's the question of "which bridge". There's the present church
% bridge, the one from the '80s, the one from the '70s, the one Filbert wrote
% up, etc. etc.
%
% One of the main problems being that we don't know for sure what bulletins
% LRH wrote as opposed to what others stamped his name to. There are have
% differing ideas as to what the "standard" bridge should look like, like
% the pilot's model for example.
%
% And then there's Captain Bill Robertson's bridge, and other optional
% bridges from various corners.
%
% Good luck. But I see problems in logistics right from the beginning.
%
% Robert
On 27 Dec, Joe The Eternal replied
> Thanks Robert,
>
> That is a very good response. I say we get the Bridge as it stands now
> within the church. In just the 10 or so years that I was in I saw a lot
> of changes. When I heard about the early 80's purge, which I had just
> missed, I realized it would be a big job.
>
> So the 1990's version would be the most approprate Scientology Bridge to
> put up, since this is the one they are protecting as standard tech.
> Later on we could do a version that compares the different CO$ versions.
> The idea is to hit them where they live, and make it free for all. Then
> it is up to the individual to work on their own bridge using everything
> that is available on the net. Get it?
>
> We all make it together or we don't make it at all.
> (AKA "We all hang together or we will all hang separately.)
Then Heidrun answered Roberts earlier post with
# You're right; but a good supermarket has all the brands.
#
# Then the client (the client is king!) decides what he wants
# to download and use, and you install a page counter for each brand
# and after a year you know what's "The Bridge".
#
# Free market principle!
#
# Heidrun Beer
#
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# "You shall know them by their fruits." (The Bible)
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
To which Joe replied (on 27 Dec 97)
> Excellent Heidrun. Let's get it all out there and see what works and
> what doesn't. The more people we have working on the different steps of
> all the different bridges, the more we will get real scientific
> scrutiny, and know what really works.
> Get the word out.
>
> Joe the Eternal
==========
A most excellent idea.
The logistics of gathering all tech and making it available to
all are enourmous. But it should be done. And any effort in
this direction will be of great value.
Now the first question that comes to mind is "what is a bridge?".
I assume that you mean all the references necessary to audit
all the way up.
Here we have the problem of the public reference vs the complete
reference with all background.
---
A modern set of Academy packs and tape transcripts would be
a start. But when we add in the C/S series and specialist
rundowns (ext/int etc.), we are pretty much talking about
a full set of tech volumes and many of the BC tapes as well.
---
For the clearing course, we have the public reference, by which
I mean the platens and the CC instruction booklet and the two
tape transcripts (pattern of the bank and mastery of GPMs) that
are on the internet. And we have the HCOBs on power and grade 6
also available on the internet. We are only missing a transcript
of the CC film as far as the references given to anybody on
grades 5 to Clear.
But the background theory is on a set of Staff Clearing Tapes
(SHSC) from 1964-5 which are totally unavailable anywhere and
are not even known to people who have done the Class 8 course.
I have asked ex-Flag class 8s about these and nobody has heard
them. Rumor has it that there is a set in a locked closet at ASHO
and one would assume the same for all the other advanced orgs,
but even their solo C/Ses don't apparantly train on the actual
theory underlying the CC and power.
And the more complete theory on implants and GPMs is really
the entire BC tapes, which are around here and there in the
freezone but which are not on the net.
---
For OT levels, when we include the various versions of OT 1
etc., OT 2 and 3, and the old 4-7 (which are short) in addition
to a NOTS pack, we really have all versions of the OT levels
that were issued. The only weak area is OT 2 where a few of
the last chapters are missing.
---
If we look at the old (1975) tech volumes, they are done in
a complete manner including tracking all the revisions, so
this is a totality of all bridges up to that point.
The new set has the more modern references but looses all
the historical track.
So both sets are needed.
---
At maximum, there are also all the old tapes, including the
transcripts in the R&D volumes.
This is the real background theory on old OT 5 to 7, but
it is tons more material, representing enough stuff to
yield dozens of OT levels if arranged in modern style.
There is some point in the late 60s when Ron says that
all the levels above OT 3 are already there in the 1950s
material.
There are about 2900 tapes and somewhere between 300 and 400
of them are in R&D volumes 1 to 12 covering the time from
1950 to mid 1952. The really interesting stuff only begins
around volume 10 as Ron gets into the OT area instead of
stuggling with early Dianetics.
Here is a brief summary of tapes.
Big LRH Lecture Series's (20+ tapes)
These are in hours rather than a count of lectures since
some of the ACCs number by half hour. Note that the
modern (SHSBC etc.) lectures are 1 1/2 hours. The counts
are approximate based on a quick glance at the Flag master
list of tapes and include suppelmental lectures etc.
The new names for those sets that are on casset are listed
to the right.
1952 HCL 36
T88 38
---- * end of R&D 12 ----
LPC 29
PDC 76 Philadelphia Doctorate Course
1953 SPRL 20
1ACC 83 Exteriorization & Phenomena of Space
2ACC 73
PHC 42
1954 3ACC 77
4ACC 78
5ACC 30 Universes
6ACC 50
7ACC 33 some are in the Phoenix Lectures
8ACC 33 CofHA lectures
9ACC 22
UC 21
1955 PLPS 25
4LACC 50
1956 HPCA 21
15ACC 26 Power of Simplicity
1957 16ACC 29 Anatomy of Cause
17ACC 31
LCHNR 20 Radiation
18ACC 25 Illusion or Truth
1958 19ACC 38
20ACC 37
5LACC 23
1959 SHPA 26 Skills of a Theta Being
1MACC 32 Responsibility & State of OT
1960 SHACC 25
1961-66 SHSBC 447
SHSC 29 (confidential)
Class 8 19 (confidential)
total about 1700
Short famous sets:
T80, SOP, 10ACC, 21ACC, 22ACC, 3SA-ACC
FEBC, ESTO, XDN, SO
ASMC & many congresses etc.
(note that T80 is now "route to infinity")
Note that the 11th to 14th American ACCs and unmentioned London
and South African ACCs were not given by Ron.
Many of the current sets of cassets (such as the Freedom Congress)
are not listed in the above because they fall below the 20+
size limit that I used to keep the list short.
Excluding the tapes on the SHSBC and in the R&D volumes,
there are about 2000 tapes from the 1950s. About 700 of
these are available on casset with transcripts. A different
600 or so were available up though the early 1980s on Reels
(and also about 200 of the ones that are now on casset).
About 700 have not been available in modern times.
Note that the old Reels were selections from various
lecture series (such as a dozen at random from the 1st ACC)
whereas the new style is to do complete series, but very
few have been done so far.
Some of the 700 that have not been sold in modern times
could be found in archives at the various orgs and some
can be found in the freezone from old timer's collections.
Gold has most of these but takes its time about releasing
each new set because they are expensive and the market
can't bear too many at once.
There are also notes or old transcripts of some of the
700 unavailable tapes that are floating around in the
field and freezone.
As to the 3rd ACC which I talk about occasionally (it is
the last series in the original OT research and is the
most advanced one that Ron ever did), I have heard
less than 20 of the tapes. But there is an excellent
set of ACC Course notes on this ACC (about 2 inches
thick) that has been available in xerox form in the
field (and was probably available at the orgs until
the practice of selling notes was forbidden in the
1960s). I checked these against the lectures that
I had on reels and they compare favorably, getting all
important points and processing commands verbatim.
The Class 8 tapes would be especially welcome since
I have not heard all of these.
---------------
Note that the OT Hatting courses given on the flagship
just consist of listening to one of the sets of cassettes
with a few clay demos (like the OT doctorate course).
There are many of these hatting courses, corresponsing
to different sets of tapes. Mostly they concentrate on
small sets of tapes because the price increases proportionately
when longer sets are used and it makes it hard to sell the
course and takes them longer to deliver the course.
As far as I know, there is no actual application of the
data on the tapes when somebody does one of the OT hatting
courses. They wouldn't actually run the processes.
---------------
Unfortunately, the CofS never had a good book on how to
do modern auditing. It is studied by jumping around from
one reference to another, mostly SHSBC stuff both in the
tech volumes and on tapes.
Filbert's book is an excellent textbook on lower level
auditing as it was delivered in 1967 with updates based
on later materials but doing everything in the 1967 style.
Or maybe I should call this the pre-standard tech style.
This is the way that auditing was done from the time when
the grades were released (1965) until the arrival of the
Class 8s in late 1968. Geoffrey upgraded it with what
seemed right and ignored other elements of the original
standard tech (which did, after all, make a mess of the
subject - quickies and things like that). As such, he
presents a synthesis that never quite existed in the orgs
but would have if the 8 course had not been such as mess.
His upper levels are not CofS. I think that his platen
with "to create perfect affinity" and so forth is a valid
platen, but it is not the one that CofS uses (which I
believe is also a valid implant platen).
--------------
Since Filbert's and my books are already available from multiple
websites, I wouldn't worry about them for now.
Collecting together all the upper level material from the
net would be helpful to people. Besides the Nots pack,
the biggest collection is in scamizdat 11 which is pretty
much cumulative of all the earlier scamiz sets.
The biggest boon would be to scan in the tech volumes.
The 1975 tech volumes have 12 volumes at about 600 pages
each with about 900 words per page. This totals to about
7200 pages and would be about 40 megabytes in txt format.
The new tech volumes have about 18 volumes at about 600 pages
each with about 700 words per page. This totals to about
10800 pages and would be about 45 megabytes in txt format.
The SHSBC cassets include transcripts with about 12 tapes
per book at about 300 pages each with about 800 words per
page. This would be about 11000 pages and about 55 MB in
txt format.
The 12 new R&D volumes each have about 800 pages with
about 450 words per page. This would be about 9600 pages
and about 28 MB.
The 700 or so other 1950s cassets that are available with
transcripts would probably be another 50 MB or so.
Throwing in another 30 MB (guess) for the books, this
gives us about 250 MB. Easy enough to fit on a single
CD Rom (and with enough room left for the other 100 MB
or so of tapes that we don't yet have transcripts for).
--------------
On 31 Dec 97, fun@thingy.apana.org.au (David Gerard) replied
to an earlier post of mine about putting the tech on CDROM.
The subject was "Super Scio - TO VINCE ABOUT LOST TECH"
:CD recorders are in the several-hundred-dollars range.
:
:Lots of home computers have several hundred meg spare which can be used
:quite easily for CD-ROM mastering.
:
:Blank CDs are a few dollars.
:
:The hard part is getting it all into electronic form. Making CDs from it is
:cheap and *easy*.
He is quite correct, the price has come way down on making
your own CDs.
The scanning from book form can be done using a flatbed scanner
and OCR (optical character recognition) software that usually
comes with good scanners. This gives you the book in computer
text format. From there it can be put on a CDROM or posted
to the net.
Just getting the 1975 tech volumes scanned in might take 30 to
40 hours of page turning (about the same work as photocopying
the document) and would yield a 40 MB text file as mentioned
earlier.
But this all by itself would be a tremendous boon to the
freezone and would be another step on the road towards liberating
the tech.
------------
But I really wish that Gold would get moving and do this
for us. I believe that they already have it all in electronic
format including the tapes that are unavilable.
Unfortunately, the CofS tends to be very far behind the times
technically. They rejected the very idea of using computers
until the late 1970s. They kept issuing tapes on reels for
a decade after the recording industry had gone to cassettes.
And whatever they do will be geared for monopoly pricing and
getting the maximum bucks that the market will bear.
Policy and management get in their way every time they try
to change or take advantage of something new.
Despite all the early breakthoughs, sometimes they act like
the Amish of metaphysics.
------------
I really like your idea of getting all the tech available
on the web.
Don't worry about the total volume of material involved.
Just do something and trust that others will do something
too.
Somebody said that they had scanned in the PDC transcripts
not too long ago. Hopefully they will get in touch with
you so that the work doesn't have to be repeated.
If you do scan in some large work, be sure to distribute
it to a number of locations immediately so that it can't
all be taken out with a single raid.
--------------
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
subj : Super Scio Tech - Working the Self Clearing Book
WORKING WITH THE SELF CLEARING BOOK
I have been working through the self clearing book myself.
As I have said elsewhere, I myself could be thought of as
somebody who has done a light and sloppy pass on the entire
book and who is ready to do a second run through and make a
thorough job of it.
Some beginners might actually need two times through the
book to reach the point that I'm at now, but many who
have gotten a lot of previous auditing or been working
on their own in the freezone might reach this point fairly
quickly.
So I think it is valuable to record my experiences as I
push these processes to the limit.
I have been going along carefully, starting with the very
first process and doing everything in a precise manner.
I have been violating what professional Scientologists
would call programming of cases (or mixing practices) by
also continuing to work other experimental areas occasionally,
as you can see from my post on Homer's writeup on "The Proof".
This has not caused any trouble, but I do not do the two
things at the same time. In other words, I will sit down
and spend some time working the book and not fool around
with other experimental things while I do that.
At this point I am up to the middle of chapter 6.
I have run many of these processes before. This area
of the book deals with recall processes or what Scientology
sometimes refers to as "straightwire". I was run on
the "ARC Straightwire" expanded grade back in the 1970s.
And I have run Ron's self analysis book (which also addresses
this area) more than once. In other words, I have already had
tons of processing on this subject, and some of these kind of
processes have even been overrun on me at various times
in the past.
With one exception, every process ran again without overrun
and to a new level of depth, reaching areas that had
previously been unaccessible and producing big gains
and cognitions.
The one exception was the "think about Matter/Energy/Space/Time"
process in chapter 4, which turned on immediate overrun
phenomena (I started yawning like crazy). Not only
was this originally run (to a nice win) on me when I
received the straightwire grade years ago, but it is
something I have done a lot since then. My theory here
is that it is already down to maximum depth for my
current case state and therefore overruns when I try
to push it deeper.
The handling was simply to spot the first time I went
release on it, which turned off the overrun feeling.
When I did section 4.2 agree/disagree, I decided that
a second process would be helpful in the area and added
---
4.2.2
Pick an idea such as "The Earth is Flat" and alternately
agree and disagree with it until you feel in control.
Then pick another one and repeat. The ideas can be
true or false or things that you are unsure of. Continue
until you have real freedom of thought and can think for
yourself.
----
On 5.13, I felt that a 4th command should be added to
the set as follows:
d) think of a time when another taught somebody something successfully
----
Note that both of these are enhancements rather than
essentials.
I also felt that I should add a note somewhere in either
chapter 4 or at the begining of chapter 6 to the effect
that one should concentrate on spotting precise moments
when running recalls instead of simply having vague ideas.
This is another one of these "everybody knows" type
assumptions that some beginners might miss.
-----
I'm actually surprised at how far some of these processes
are going.
I am certain at this point that the overrun phenomena
is nothing more than trying to take one area too deep
while too many other areas remain unhandled at that
level of depth.
You need to dust off areas and take your wins and move
on to other things. But you can keep coming back and
pushing these things further. And that means that the
theoretical super gains can be attained eventually.
Total recall is light years beyond a low level straighwire
recall release as achieved in ordinary Scientology grades,
but deeper second and third stage releases on the
same processes keep carrying you forward towards that
potential end product.
Looking towards a bright future,
The Pilot
==========================================
The following trailer was used on all of these posts
------------------
See the "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" by the Pilot
at http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/pilot.html
or http://www.igs.net/~michaelv/scnreform.htm or
via http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/good.htm or
The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm
Get the original Pilot materials (the 32 part SUPER SCIO book) at:
ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/index.html
or from the Pilots Home Page or pick up the ss## files
from Homer's archive at lightlink.com.
Get the new Self Clearing Book from the Pilots Home Page (above) or in
gzip format from ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/selfclear.gz
or pkzip from http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/fza1000.htm or Homer's archive
All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archive
#19 and #20 and posted to ACT. The posting archives are also
available on The Pilots Home Page.
Note that some of my posts only go to ACT
------------------