Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot)
Subject: Super Scio Archive - <4/9> posts of May-Jun 97
Date: 25 Aug 1997  14:00:15


POST4.TXT

SUPER SCIO PILOT POSTS OF MAY-JUNE 1997

(this contains 2 messages from April and 2 follow up messages
from May).

========================

Contents (Headers):

Subj : Super Scio Tech - A New Process
Subj : Super Scio Tech - TO CB WILLIS RE AUDITING ON BELIEFS

Subj : Super Scio Tech - The Furies
Subj : Super Scio Tech - CONTINUING THE FURIES DISCUSSION AND PROCESSING


========================

Subj : Super Scio Tech - A New Process

Note that I'm now putting "Super Scio Tech" in the message headers
of my posts which relate to my own attempts to extend the
Scientology tech.  


A NEW PROCESS:


This one fell in my lap while mulling over power processing theory
and stirring in various ideas about belief systems that have 
occasionally been around in the field.

This is a power process both in the sense that it can restore
great horsepower and in the sense that it needs to be handled
like power process 6.

One of the basic concepts of power was that the core abberations
float in time and are still here now in the present and can be
spotted by asking a question addressed to present time.  But
their actual source is far in the past, so you follow up with
a question aimed at the past to remove basic charge on the area.

Unfortunately, we have been saddled with the mistaken idea that
all of the core abberations disappear with the attainment of the
state of clear.  But that has to be a mistake.  Anything dealing
with engrams or implants must be far from basic because an
unabberated being would not be subject to abberation by means
of force.

The following aims at a core abberation which goes all the way
back.

a) What do you believe
b) What have you done about that

It seems deceptively simple.  Almost like you would get trivial
answers.  Let me assure you that if you are up to running it
at all, it cracks the heavens open.

This one really needs class 7 TRs if your going to run it on
somebody else.  As far as I can tell, its an order of magnitude
hotter than anything in grade 5/5A power.

This might give you things like:

"What do you believe?" "I believe that god is good."  "What have you
done about that?" "I burn down churches".

This is where a beginner might flub.  You don't query this.  You
don't fall off the chair in amazement.  And you use a gentle
acknowlegement because the PC may be cycling very very far down
the track and you musn't pull his attention up to PT.

What, you don't think you'll get an answer like the above?  How
about the Spanish Inquisition?  The PC thinks God is good, 
decides that the churches are sullying God's reputation, and
starts accidentally knocking over the candels every time he
goes to mass.  But you can't bother the PC and distract him trying
to find out all these details.  You are probably nowhere near
basic on this one.

Don't worry about whether his beliefs are right or wrong.  If
they are beliefs instead of certainties (he really knows), then
there is some unknown or unconfronted aspect and therefore he
will mess up sooner or later and mock up something undesirable.
And he will persist in his mockup because he refuses to
invalidate his belief.

These beliefs can go all the way back to the earliest universes
and even back to the jewel of knowlege.

He has things that he is continuously creating because he has
faith but he doesn't really know.  So he doesn't dare let go
of the creations.

This could be the process which resolves the 8th dynamic.
  
To run this solo, you would find a deepset belief that you have
and which you feel is very basic and goes far back in your
existance and then you would run "what have you done about
that" repetatively until you had a major cognition.

When I tried this, I picked my deep belief that "The Truth
Shall Set You Free".  I still believe in this and think that
it is correct.  The point of the process was not to lose the
belief (but one would hope to lose any beliefs that really
were incorrect) but simply to clean it up, so to speak.

When I ran the second command on this belief, my first answers
were "I studied everything like crazy", "I joined the CofS",
and similar stuff.  Then something very deep came to the
surface.  My answer was "I hold onto mass (both mental and
physical) in the hopes of learning something from it".  In
other words, I would hold onto some black mass just because
there was some faint chance that there would be a truth 
burried in it.  This action made me into a pack rat, both
physically and spiritually.  And when I realized how foolish
this was, a great deal of mental weight fell away.

Now this could be run again and again on different deeply
held beliefs.  The "done" might include overts but certainly
shouldn't be limited to only looking for overts.

And maybe this one could pull the plug on fanaticism.
Ron once said (a bit disparagingly) that "the fanatics will 
always be with us".  I might suggest that the smarter course
would be to audit out the fanaticism before they sink the
entire subject with their sick dramitizations.


Best,

The Pilot


========================


Subj : Super Scio Tech - TO CB WILLIS RE AUDITING ON BELIEFS


TO CB WILLIS RE AUDITING ON BELIEFS

In response to my post: Super Scio Tech - A New Process

cbwillis@netcom.com (C. B. Willis) wrote (on May 19, 1997)

>The Pilot (pilot@hiddenplace.com) wrote:
>: a) What do you believe
>: b) What have you done about that
>
>The Q "What have you done about that?" implies that the belief stated as
>the answer to a) is a problem, which it may not be.  The Q "What have you
>done because of that?" is a different question that is likely to produce
>quite different answers from b).  I'm confused by the question set,
>because I don't think you want to imply the person's belief is a problem
>even if it were, but to ask b) when you mean "What have you done because
>of that?" is not ideal either.  Comments?  I'm looking fwd to running the
>Q set but want to make sure I have the Q's right first, since b) above
>doesn't make full sense to me, unless I assume my belief is a problem. 
>
>- CBW
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>| cbwillis@netcom.com            | "Values are the infrastructure   |
>|                                |  upon which civilization         |
>|                                |  will be reinvented."  - CBW     |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

The assumption is that the belief is a fixed idea.  This doesn't mean
that the belief is wrong.  It is probably right.  But if it is a
belief rather than a scientific fact (from your own perspective, I
don't mean textbook science here), then it is not totally viewed.

Any fixed idea, even if correct, will occasionally get you in trouble
because absolutes are unobtainable.  If the idea is known and 
understood but not fixed, then you have the flexibility to adapt.

The style of the process and the exact wording of the second command
is based on grade 5 power processing theory.  Homer has transcripts
of John Mac's tapes, JM1 and JM2 in his archives which talk about
this style of processing.  The idea is that the a) command spots
something floating in time and then the b) command cycles the person
back on the track.  My observation is that deep seated beliefs are
floating in time and that therefore this processing style can be
applied to them.

The idea is to run this on a deep seated belief that goes very far
back on the track.

The hoped for result is to blow something that the person is
continuously mocking up now in present time.  Something that is floating
in time but originates way back on the track.  That is what I found
when I ran it on my belief in knowlege and truth, namely that I
was continuing to hold onto mental masses in the hope of learning
something from them.  I was doing this "now" in present time (not
any more thank goodness) and I had been doing it continuously probably 
for trillions of years.

But I don't think that I would have found it with "what stupid thing
am I always doing because of this belief".  It was something I had
been doing too long and it was too deeply ingrained in my operating
basis.  I would have just sat around and not noticed it.  So I had
to look earlier on the track and work back to a time when the habit
was not so much a part of me and I would causatively hang onto some
old mass for investigation rather than automatically just keeping
them there without thinking about it.  Of course I can still do that
now, what is gone is the automatic unthinking mechanism.

I think that the "done about" rather than "done because of" is more
likely to hit a continuously created doingness.  It seems to me that
it might go just a little bit earlier and can, if necessary,
encompass a time when the person was uncertain of the belief or even
comitting overts against it.

There are other things that could be done on the subject of beliefs.
A belief would become fixed because it is used as a solution.  It
is not in itself a problem (usually) but if it is held fixed as
a solution, it will generate later problems to the degree that it
is held fixed instead of flexible.

Overts and other things could also be addressed.

But in the above process, we are looking for a fixed doingness.
The command is simply meant to give the PC enough "room" to mention
problems/solutions or overts or whatever if they have to come up.
So it's very simple really.  Just spot what has been done and let
the chips fall where they may.

Good auditing,

The Pilot

Note that I'm putting a few large technical posts onto ACT only
without cross posting them to ARS.

                                    
------------------

See the new "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" by the Pilot at
http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/pilot.html

Get the Pilot materials (the 32 part SUPER SCIO book) at:
ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/index.html
or pick up the ss## files from Homer's archive at lightlink.com.

Subsequent follow-ups, arguments for reform, defenses, criticisms,
occasional jokes, and even more tech can be found by searching dejanews
http://www.dejanews.com/ either for "Super Scio" or for all
pilot postings to ARS by using the following search string:
    ~a (The Pilot) & ~g (alt.religion.scientology)

My public key is as follows: (really version 2.6ui)

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6

mQCNAjOdP4IAAAEEAMm+dCcv5Tx0KMfaqvvQrhqAlXAuUaMRyLp5VS1CHAE0C0Aq
LR9N884PAfTJ//aDBZKYMAXMxp/pp+Ei/Yq9n5Rh8GAkoFhVt1TjeyKuthTMduOD
cbkAmFGLQiKkvnx/pYtlyUIjqt2cFjh/qBWH2tEbPXW+uZV1xssIt3ZgVQbNAAUR
tCFUaGUgUGlsb3QgPHBpbG90QGhpZGRlbnBsYWNlLmNvbT4=
=q/DH
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----




========================


Subj : Super Scio Tech - The Furies


THE FURIES

There is an area which I have been calling the "black emotions" such
as hatred, vengance, jeliousy etc.  In Chapter 4 of Super Scio, I
mention that a grade of auditing needs to be researched in this
area, but I didn't have the answers to solving it at that time.

Various freezone researchers have been poking into this.  Alan
Walters call them "The Furies" and Enid Vien calls them "Psychic
Storms".  Inspired by reading their materials, I decided to take
another stab at this one myself.

Everyone can see these cores of rage exploding occasionally.  Almost
anyone who has been active in Scientology for a long time has at
least one of these masses buiding up on the CofS itself.  The
loyalists usually keep these well suppressed but they do blow
up occasionally.  And when somebody throws in the towel and leaves,
you're likely to see fireworks.  You see these things in ordinary
life too, so its not just the org, but its especially common in
Scientology, which means that we are either creating or restimulating
these things (or both) without properly handling them.

The standard tech approach is to handle these as an ARC break, and
that just doesn't work for these things (it does work just fine
on ordinary ARCXs - this area is something else).  It strips off 
the surface charge and cools the person down a bit (if you're lucky) 
by handling the trigger which caused the core of rage to blow up, 
but it bypasses the underlying reason, and so the core continues to grow.

I have had a black mass of rage building up on the time period of
late 1968 when the first crew of Class 8 auditors came back from
Flag and started cutting the auditors to shreds.  Once in a rare
while it would flare up out of control and I would feel like killing 
somebody.  I have gotten this handled as an ARCX a number of times, and 
that does cool it down for a little while, but it never errased
it.  Neither did Dianetics or any other handling.

Alan's handling goes further than the orgs, but it also misses the
mark as far as handling the source of the charge.  If I seem a
bit critical here, please realize that it is not meant as an attack.
It is simply the disappointment of an avid fan seeing somebody hit
what should have been a home run and watching them trip and fall
as they round the bases.

Alan gets itsa on the fury, and then runs the emotions ("moods")
that the thetan is mocking up as part of it.  This is good.
It puts the being at cause.  But its like handling an ARCX with
two way comm instead of simply pricking the bubble of charge with
an ARCX assessment.  So it leaves residual charge which he tries
to scan out with his "holographic" handling instead of seeing the
whole thing dissolve (which is what happens if you really pull
the plug on something).

The underlying button suggested by Enid Vien is betrayal.  This does
seem to be a factor, but when I looked over my own area of fury
from 1968, the feelings of being betrayed were after the fact
rather than at the first point of upset.  For me on this incident,
it was like spotting the subsequent drop in affinity on an ARCX
where the source was an enforced reality.  In other words, 
betrayal might be one of the key buttons, but it wasn't the
right one in my particular case.

Since ARCX handling didn't work, but this did seem to be the same
kind of thing on a vaster scale, I decided to try using the
Be / Do / Have triangle as a method of approach.  I think that
this triangle sums up to Games rather than Experience (which is
the common freezone interpretation) so I included that as well.

But the usual CDEINR assessment just didn't seem to hit the mark.
So I scratched my head about what could be done to be/do/have/games
which would get me so pissed off.  And I realized that the button
had to be "distroyed".

As soon as I formulated the assessment, I knew the answer.

The assessment was:

Connected with that area, is there a Distroyed Beingness?
Connected with that area, is there a Distroyed Doingness?
Connected with that area, is there a Distroyed Havingness?
Connected with that area, is there a Distroyed Game?

The instant reaction was on Beingness and the instant answer
was "An Auditor".  And with that answer, all the charge fell
apart spectacularly.  It was like poping a baloon or lancing a
boil.  It was unbelievable.

In early 1968 I had been a damn good auditor, perhaps a bit 
innocent and still learning, but on the whole I was very happy
with the beingness and most other people (PCs especially) were
also happy with the beingness I was mocking up.  Then the Class
8s showed up and that beingness was crushed, shattered, and
stamped into the ground.  In subsequent years, that valence was
glued back together with scotch tape and chewing gum, but it
was never the same.

The suppressed rage on this had been enormous.  The answer to
the question was completely obvious in retrospect.  And yet
I'd never quite hit it precisely in earlier auditing and I didn't
know that obvious answer until the moment that I asked myself the 
question above.  And with that, the rage was simply gone.  It was
the first time that I have every been able to think about that
time period without wanting to strangle somebody.  I'm still
amazed that I can look back at it and actually feel good.  There
is an enormous feeling of freedom and serenity connected with
this.

This is not to say that the things which happened back in late
1968 were good, but simply to say that it has lost all power to
affect me.  The original "auditor" beingness has come back to
me in place of the patched up copy.

I never audited professionally again after 1969.  I had a true
horror of doing it, it was dangerous in the extreme and highly
restimulative.  All the auditing I did subsequently (and I
did quite a lot) was auditing of family, friends, students,
and staff members, all done at no charge and either un-CSed or
with CSes who I felt were "safe".  I was lucky in that some of 
the PCs who I had audited back in the early days had themselves 
become Class 8 CSes and had a mistaken belief that I was still 
one of the best auditiors around and they coaxed and pampered me
back into auditing and gradually I built myself back up again.
But I always refused, absolutely, to ever again audit a paying PC.

Now for the first time, that big black stuck point is gone.

In this case, the whole thing simply blew, but I can imagine
that you might need to go earlier similar sometimes.  Also,
you might need to get Itsa, just like handling an ARCX.  In
this specific instance, I had already hit the area so many times
that it was ready to blow apart if the correct button was hit.

I cannot guarantee that "distroy" is always the correct button.
Maybe there are others that need to be assessed.  Perhaps things
like betrayal.  Or maybe its simply the next lower button on
the CDEINR assessment and we mearly need to add it.  Broadening
this out to a general technique would take some work on the
part of highly trained people who are sharp enough to spot
missing buttons while soloing their own areas of fury.

Because of all the recent A.C.T. discussions of Robert Ducharme's
GPM Clearing and running "shocks", I decided to try researching
this a bit further by looking for points of shock in the area.

Sure enough, they were there.  Or rather, they had been there and
now seemed to be discharged.  These were points of spiritual shock
as the beingness ("an auditor") was erroded by continual counter
postulates and impingement.  Of course there were physical shocks
as well (overboards, etc.) but they seemed insignificant by
comparison.

Examining the area further, there was absolutely no connection
with GPMs.  There was no direct opterm and no goals in opposition.
Somebody else might have had different considerations and gotten
a similar incident locked up on a GPM, but as far as I was
concerned, I had been crushed by my own side rather than by an
opponent.

But there was most certainly a valance which had been crushed.
And that brings up a point that I mentioned in Super Scio but
which I'd now like to take a little further.

The apparent pattern is that there are locks (PTPs, overts, ARCXs,
etc.) stuck onto secondaries and engrams which are in turn suck
to valences which are stuck to GPMs which are grouped together
to form the core of the reactive mind.

In 1952, Ron said that the current pattern of counter-thought
(locks) which is built up on counter-emotion (secondaries) which 
is in turn built up on counter-effort (engrams) is an inversion 
and that the scale starts with thought followed by emotion followed 
by effort.

I merged this with the more modern discoveries and some practical
observations (how could a godlike being ever get an engram or
GPM or implant or whatever unless he was already abberated in
the extreme) and came up with the following:

1. The first abberation consists of willful decisions not to 
communicate.

2. This leads to PTPs, Overts, ARCXs etc.  All these things
build on themselves (chains of problems) and each other (comitting
overts to solve problems, etc.) and lead to further out-communication
which encourages more PTPs etc.

3. Finally the being is so weak and full of considerations that
he can't recreate things at will and therefor he can experience
loss.  These lead to more PTPs etc. which in turn encourage more
secondaries and so on.

4. Eventually he has lost so much that he starts interiorizing
into his creations and therefore can be hit and hurt and thus
becomes subject to engrams.  Now he's really got things for
the secondaries and locks to stick too and all these things keep
happening and encouraging each other.  And he continues to make
decisions to not communicate (encouraged by the locks, secondaries,
and engrams) and keeps launching new abberations into the mess.

5. Hit one to many times, he now begins to solve this by mocking
up identities both to protect him from direct impact and to
let him evolve and tailor these valences to handle the locks,
secondaries, and engrams which are constantly on his plate.  And these
things get smashed and bent out of shape and the more basic abberations
start bundling up on them too.

6. But he can't make the valences persist either, so he begins
using a series of valences aligned towards a goal so that he can
shift from one to the next in succession as they get distroyed.
And so he comes around to building up GPMs, which further encourages
all the other abberations.

7. Now some bright guy comes along and designs an implant to group
all these GPMs together and its mud from there on down.


I don't think that this is a complete picture, but it does show
why an OT would continue to have PTPs, Overts, and ARCXs even 
after ungrouping the collapsed mass of his GPMs.  And it
proposes that even after somebody totally errased every actual
GPM they ever had in any universe, they might still have some
kind of "Valence Masses" on identities that had been crushed.

The more I fool around with really early stuff (home universe and
earlier), the more I seem to run into charged valences that are
not tied into a goal oppose pattern.

Think of a chess game.  There are six valences (king, queen, rook,
bishop, knight, and pawn).  The goals for both teams are identical,
the only difference being which side they are on.  The valences
are not in one to one direct opposition.  Its six against six.
And pieces might be sacrificed by their own side.

In 1968, I felt like I was a white bishop that was run over by 
the white queen (I know chess doesn't quite work this way) on
her way to attack the enemy king.  The really sad part was that
it was a failed checkmating attempt miss-planned by a white
king who had already lost his hold on the game, so the sacrifice
was for nothing.

I do think that its a big mistake to call anything "GPM Clearing"
unless it deals with goals in opposition.  I do not think of
R2-12 or 3D criss cross as GPM processes, since they deal
exclusively with valence packages.  I do think of R3GA, R3MX,
and R6GPMI as GPM processes because they do address opposing
goals.

The reason I think this way is that we are solving a huge puzzle
with a trememdous number of pieces and numerous different areas,
some of which we do not even have names for yet.  If we confuse
the blue of the sky with the blue of the lake and try to force
fit pieces into the wrong area, we're just going to get more
confused.

Robert may have found something very important, and he's making
the mistake of forcing it to fit into an area of the puzzle
that is already fairly well defined and it doesn't line up
very well.  It might actually be something more basic than
GPMs.  If it is obvious to him that he is clearing up distroyed
identities, then he could call it identity clearing or valence
clearing, but if this is not obvious to him, then he shouldn't
use that name either.  In that case he needs to find our what
he is handling and pick an appropriate name.  Otherwise some
know-it-all like me or Alan might just toss it all out the
window on the basis of it being a shallow approach to handling
GPMs when it is really some exciting new area that needs to
be addressed as well.

I've run into all sorts of other things that don't even fit into
the above pattern.  Things like symbol masses, abberative thought 
pools, and penalty universes.  

In my humble opinion (IMHO), I don't even know the half of it
yet because every time I pull on a little thread like the above,
I get as many new questions as I get answers.

Homer is right.  Post everything to the net.  I can't go it alone.
You can't go it alone.  Even Ron (numero uno super researcher)
couldn't go it alone.  Just look at how he ended up when he tried
to be the only source.

We (and this includes the Church of Scientology itself even though
they haven't cognited yet) are not in the position of auto 
manufacturers in cut throat competition to overjump each other 
with slightly different improvements.  We are in the position 
of alchemists struggling to figure out the true laws of chemistry 
and physics.  In the absence of cross-fertilization, it will 
take centuries (if it is allowed to occur at all).

Speeking of cross fertilization, I was pleasantly surprised
to see that Ralph Hilton also took a stab at the Helatrobus implant.
I only found about half of what I think is a series of about 256 goals
(see Chapter 8 of Super Scio).  He found about half of them also.
There are a surprising number that are on both our lists and
the other ones he found feel like they fit into the gaps in my
platen for this thing.  If enough people tackel this one, we
might even wind up with a complete platen and who knows what
benifits might result.  It makes Ron's research into this monster
seem posatively shallow.

Another useful piece was Homer's recent followup on my comment
that initially the being only fell into traps of his own making
and Homer's further conclusion (which I'm sure is correct) that
early on, the first overts would always be failed attempts
to commit an overt.

I have only recently started reading Homer's archives.  When I
first ran across them last year, I decided to finish the book
(Super Scio) instead before launching off into a vast area of
new ideas.  I wanted to get all my own stuff written up and
organized before I lost track completely.  For me it was a major
case action.  Now I'm taking the next step.

By the way, I never said that you shouldn't run engrams on a
Clear, I only warned about R3R.  I had a lot of dianetics after
clear.  Some of it went very well (especially a dianetic assist),
but a lot of it was trouble.  The biggest problems were health form
and drug rundown style somatic chains and (worst of all) putting
in quad flows.  Those kinds of incidents ran well on simple
recall processes or self-analysis (lots and lots of engrams
ran out very nicely on getting self-analysis audited on me in the
HGC after clear as part of an advance program).  When you run
this kind of stuff with Dianetics, you often remember the incident 
in detail on the locate step of R3R and are ready to go earlier 
and then the auditor insists that you mock it all up again 
to run, and that gets you into trouble.  Then it doesn't "errase" 
(because it was already gone and has been put back) so you 
try to go earlier on a null chain and pickup some BT's picture 
because there's nothing else there to find.  Eventually you 
wind up with more pictures than when you started and it's 
all borrowed bank.

Incident running of some sort is definitely needed.  The real 
question is what's safe and what works.  I could even see using
R3R on something heavy enough to require repetative passes.
Furthermore, full confront of the force in pictures (the
Dianetic Clear state) makes engrams into trivial incidents
but does not do so for secondaries (that would require a
willingness to lose anything, and clears do not usually have 
that).  As you can see from the above, I consider that secondaries
go much earlier on the track.

Since I don't know exactly what Robert is doing, I can't
comment either way.  If the PCs are making gains, and they're
still happy a few days later (rather than scratching their heads
about the whole thing), then its probably fine.


Good Hunting,

The Pilot

========================


Subj : Super Scio Tech - CONTINUING THE FURIES DISCUSSION AND PROCESSING


CONTINUING THE FURIES DISCUSSION AND PROCESSING


Thank you all for the informative responses to my earlier post.

As I mentioned at that time, the charge on the area had truely
blown and I felt better about late 1968 for the first time ever.
In other words, a big keyout and persistant FN.  For a PC, this
is the time to drop it, either to work on another area or to
do OT drills or even to take a break as advised in standard tech 
(but I think is a big waste because the PC is ready to really fly).

The reason you don't normally push onward on the thing that just
blew apart is that you're going to jump the PC into an area that
is way out gradient and probably beyond his ability to Itsa
accurately and you stand a chance of keying the mess back in 
again (as you stir up the underlying factors).  Furthermore,
jumping way ahead in one area can bypass charge on other 
unhandled areas.

But pushing past into the normally unaccessible areas is valid
on somebody who is up to being a researcher instead of a PC.
In other words, people who want answers more than they want to
feel good and who are up to tolerating the unknowns and confusion
that comes up when you jump really far out.  

So on this basis, I decided to try out various things that were
suggested and see what I came up with.  But I know from previous
experience (I do try this occasionally) that this can push me
far outside of the range where I'm able to Itsa accurately, so
everything here has to be taken with a grain of salt.

When you get above your ability to Itsa, everything gets 
insufferably vague.  Mysticism and Metaphysics suffer from this
chronicly.  I grew up on this stuff and believed in past lives
from an early age, but my Itsa line on past lives was this vague 
garbage until I got some straightwire and Dianetics.  In a similar
manner, I had vague ideas of higher dimensions (again from
Metaphysics) and even struggled with four dimensional geometry
(tesseracts etc.) all to no avail until I took enough charge
off of the right stuff to let me visualize 4 dimensional objects
with reality.  Its not that the vague ideas were wrong, but
simply that they were not concrete enough to be really useful.

So be warned, the following may have serious dub-in and be
missing key factors.  I probably will not defend the conclusions
drawn and I might not even believe any of it next week.

So without further ado, I will lead you down the strange path
I followed.  Note that I have strung this together like one big 
session for the sake of continuity, but it was not all done at 
one sitting.

- -------------------

My comments about Alan's tech on the Furies were based on the
older post that is in Homer's archives.  He responded with a
more extensive rundown which follows.  I have marked his statements
with a >.

>Alan C Walters writes:
>
>The Class 8 Storm Troopers possibly activated a re-occuring VIOLATION.
>
>Re: The Furies:
>
>The first step is to put the pc at cause over the Fury.
>
>You do this by having the pc express what has been restrained.

The right item in my case was "an auditor".  It was a destroyed
beingness.  Restrained doesn't indicate in this case (its too mild), 
but it sounds like the right kind of animal.  Maybe we have the 
beginings of an assessment scale here (restrained, betrayed,
destroyed, etc. followed by combining the result with
be/do/have/games).  


>The Furies are somewhat late on the chain.
>
>The second step is to locate the source of the Fury.

Again, handled by spotting that the beingness of "an auditor" was
destroyed.


>As the source of the Fury is the Being who is furious. What then is the
>Being furious about?

Again as above.

>This takes the Being prior to the Fury.

Thats right.  I was mad after the beingness was destroyed.  The
distruction came first.  Up till then, it was "put up with anything"
and eagerly try to "make things go right".


>The only thing that causes a Being to become Furious is for the Being to
>VIOLATE any one of its Codes, Virtues, Integrity, Honesty, Honor or Principles.
>So when the Class 8's descended into your space what was YOUR VIOLATION?

Wrong.  I ran tons of O/W on this at various times.  At first, the
shallow O/W based on other peoples standards.  Later, my own O/W in
terms of my own Ethics (maybe it was an overt not to shoot the C/S).
All worthless in terms of really handling the fury.  The overts at
this time are all already the effect of the fury.  But see below.


>Find the VIOLATION:

There most certainly was one.  It was a few months earlier.  It was
the thing that ended my big keyed out OT state and got me sick.
And it set me up for this later Fury and for quite a few other bad
things as well.

The violation was that I continued to push and promote the subject
after I realized that there was something wrong (unstable case
gain from running only one process per grade).  I'm not certain what 
you mean by a code, but I have a deep comittment to truth and feel
that it is wrong to blindly promote when there is something wrong.

I actually found this one a few months ago, spotting it as the
reason I fell out of the OT state.  But I hadn't connected it
up with the later fury until I hit this question.  And it seems
to make total sense.  I can feel that there was something set
into motion and happening on a "higher level" which drew me into
the later fury.  If I wasn't propitiating, I probably would have
tried to do something, even if it was only walking out.


>Take the VIOLATION back to the first time you committed a similar VIOLATION.

Way out gradient, but lets give it a try.
Sacrificing truth for expediancy?  No, not quite right.
Ah.  Sacrificing truth to protect something that I was allied with.

Before home universe.  The effort to solve all our problems by 
setting up home universe.  I knew it wouldn't work.  Others were
raising doubts too.  But beings that I was allied with were 
pushing it as the solution.  So I supported them even though I
knew deep down that it was just sinking one step lower with yet
another unworkable solution to the problem of how do you make people
get along with each other (send the kids to their rooms so that
they wouldn't fight).


>PERMEATE IT:

Done (see above).


>Handle the SHOCK of having committed a VIOLATION.

This one doesn't feel like a shock.  Its more like a blackness
I pressed upon myself to not-is what I knew was true.


>Run CONSEQUENCES of the VIOLATION. This should bring about a full
>holographic mock-up of all connected Beingnesses and mock-ups and will
>restore them for use, if WANTED. 

This whole mess is the consequence.  Specifically, I agreed to the
idea of separating people (each to his own home universe) rather
than confronting the problem of why don't beings get along with
each other.  Seems like we all made that choice, some with more
enthusiasm and some being pushed into it, but if anyone had
confronted it we wouldn't be here.

I can get a vague mockup of matter, energy, space, and time 
connected with this and vague ideas of thousands of lines
radiating off in various directions, and I can even feel quite
good about that, but it doesn't really restore all this stuff
for use.  Vague but nice.  

I'm kind of tolerating calling this "holographic" even though 
I know that holograms don't really have any mass or energy (except 
for the laser which is relaying the picture of mass and energy).  
Might as well just call it a "picture".  Real Kodak pictures don't 
have any mass or energy either (except for the mass of the 
photograph on which they are recorded) but I've grown use to our 
special usage.  I encourage using new words for new phenomena
(there is so much we haven't mapped out yet), but relabling 
needlessly justs adds to the confusion.  I always understood picture
as used in auditing to refer to a full 3D mockup including mass and
energy etc.  Even the occasional occlusion, dub-in, or stuck
picture I ran into in Dianetics seemed to at least have some depth
in most (not all) cases.


>The chain runs from the first time you committed that VIOLATION, usually
>long before the Physical Universe. 

Obviously, from the above.

>Once basic is fully owned then all later similars will just lock scan out,
>as they are involuntary replications of the pc loathing of self for its
>VIOLATION, that includes the self induced punishment of implants, GPM's,
>Engrams, secondaries and any Cult programming you have subscribed to. 

Good point.  At least partially true.  Unfortunately, I think that
we are just talking about one code here.  My suspicion would be that
we cycle threw these just like anything else.  So there would be
other codes, each with their own violation.  You'd need to handle
them all to undercut all the later stuff.

On scanning (I spotted a few specifics and vaguely ran through a
lot of generalities), it did seem to loosen up some things.  But
there didn't seem to be a lot of loathing.  It was more like
service facing around and trying to make the original violation
right by doing it over and over again.	I seem to have done that
a lot.

By the way, I do think that violation is the right word (rather
than overt) in this case.  It fits the action better.  Overts would
be things done to another.  Violations would be betrayals of one's
true self.

>Rehab fully the Code, Virtue, Integrity, Honesty, Honor or Principle that
>was VIOLATED.

Yup.

>Alan
>

Seems like I'm finally getting an idea of what Alan means by
codes.  And it seems like something very basic.  It would seem 
to go earlier than either GPMs or "Games" (at least in the abberated
sense), since it would affect how you played games and might
cross multiple games and GPMs.

But it does seem to me that these codes are solutions to problems.
Very basic and early solutions, which is why they are so close to
theta, but solutions none the less.  I'm probably seeking truth
as a solution to entrapment or to handle the problems steming
from false data.

There has been some mention of a balancing negative code.  And
there is mention of using the negative instead of the posative
when the being wants to get out of something in an irresponsible
manner.  On that basis, the posative and negative would be
complementary rather than opposing.  In other words, the negative
of a code to know truth would not be lying or putting out false
data.  Instead, it would be using the posative factor in a 
perverted or negative manner (which was subtily reverse vector).

So what would I do if I was being lazy or irresponsible and didn't
want to take the time to handle something the right way?
The posative aspect would be to push for truth (with getting
the correct data as a significant lock) and bring people to
enlightenment.  The irresponsible act would be to overwhelm
with data.  This is the negative code.

Do I do that.  Yup.  Technical design meetings.  Nine times out
of ten, I sit there and explain carefully over and over and try
to handle MUs and (mostly) others lack of experience or lazyness.
But then comes the bad day when I'm fed up with the endless
bitching and somebody is trying to score points with managment
by insisting on a stupid (but highly political) idea.  I stop
being careful about gradients and defining things and simply
dump accurate but undefined data all over them.  It puts them
into shock.  In a few cases people have actually blown high
paying corporate jobs after such a meeting.

Lots of charge.  Lots of justifications.  Maybe even a bit of
self loathing (I usually feel sorry after doing such a thing).

Anthing basic and high scaled can be used as a two edged sword.

But this negative side feels really charged, and basic is not
in view, so I look earlier.  Magic universe.  Dangerous and
dark knowlege.  Making people afraid of knowing.  Kill them
with truth, undefined and out gradient.  And now I reap the
rewards, seeing the subject I love destroyed by an insane
urge towards confidentiality created by the deadly misuse of
truth.

You never hurt anybody with a full discription of anything.
Its the tiny piece out of the middle of a larger mass that
creates the impact.  Especially if you have managed to create
a big mystery and beef up the importance of it all.

The only way you could make somebody sick with the upper levels
is if you made them confidential and vastly important and then
hit somebody with tiny pieces out of sequence.  That has 
real impact because it stirs up things that they can't Itsa.
If the whole pack is just lying there and they can read it
if they're in the mood, its never going to bother them.

I'll guarantee this one.  A huge chain of overts of doing
this exact thing just came into view.  Its deadly.  And because
you make people afraid of knowing truth, they fall into your
trap and work hard at keeping things confidential.

I may have bored people sometimes with long winded explanations.
But its safe and nobody has ever gotten sick from it.  But
you can put somebody in shock with enough little snippits of
half truths from many different unknown areas all at once.

Notice how the negative side only pretends to compliment the
posative.  This negative use of the knowlege of truth actually
reduces knowlege and truth.

Well that seems to have cooled the area down a bit.  I have no
idea whether or not I was working on the same kind of codes
that Alan has been talking about.  But whatever I was playing
with seemed to be of vast significance and I'm now feeling
considerable relief.

It would be nice, however, to have a good definition of "codes"
and the attendent patterns/phenomena.  Keeping peoples codes
hidden (which I think is a mistake but Alan does have the right
to choose how his own org operates) is not an excuse for failing
to put out some good made up examples.

- -----------------

Getting back to the subject of "Games", there is a case factor
here and I will use Enid's term "Game Sphere" to refer to it.
Just as all goals are not GPMs, all games are not these game
spheres.

Ron made some early comments about goals, and then followed up
with the GPM research of the 1960s.  He also made some comments
about games (and that seemed to be much more significant) and
then never got back to it.  What a shame that he thought that
GPMs were it.  They are shallow late track abberations (definitely
post home universe).  The games spheres and valence masses go much 
earlier.

I'm not sure if I'm using Enid's term correctly.  If she has
something else in mind, I'll have to shift over to talking
about game masses or something like that, but it seems to me
that we are looking at the same area even if we might be seeing
some of it from different angles.

Oddly enough, I see silver spheres in connection with this games
area.  The GPMs make black mass, the earlier basic games make
silver spheres.  These are not real colors.  The GPM masses
seem "black" because they are like black holes which suck everything
in.  The game spheres seem silver because they are reflective.
My attention bounces off of them, like hitting a mirror.
These are masses of abandoned identities and I flinch away from 
occupying them again.

These things are single charge instead of double (plus minus)
charge.  Singular charges of the same polarity will repel each
other.  Double charges are electrically neutral and will collapse
into gravity wells.

And now, on to Enid's post, which I will mark with #s.

# From: ladyv <ladyv@cts.com> Wed, 21 May 1997

(mostly snipping the stuff from my previous post)

#  Actually, no. Betrayal is only one factor. There is the shock, 
#the emotion and so forth, but the key is the shift in belief. What was is 
#now not so. Whether it be a beingness, or a belief. In a Psychic Wound 
#(often accompanied by a Psychic Storm) the person shifts his game sphere 
#identity, because who he was being has failed him in some way. 
#
#	You seem to have done a good job in finding and eradicating the 
#exact consideration for you, this is the essence of Psychic Wound 
#Handling. 
#
#  So Well Done!!

Thank you.

Now here is a key point, which is the shift in belief.  Although
the charge and shock in that 1968 fury are gone, I can get a trifle
more Itsa by noticing that there indeed was a major shift in
belief.  Earlier (the violation I mentioned above), I had begun
worrying about the completeness of the tech, but I still trusted
Ron, mearly feeling that the research was incomplete and expecting
him to come up with more solutions.  The Class 8s seemed like the 
answer, and then they turned out to be on a reverse vector.  This is
what shattered my trust in Ron.

I think that psychic shock is a good term here.  Its an incident
and its significant, but it is neither physical impact (an engram)
nor is it a loss (secondary).  The earliest shocks in my 1968
incident were simply shocks, which were impacts to my beliefs
or valence or frame of reference which caused, shall we say, 
shifts in what I thought was reality.  Of course losses and
impacts hooked into this as the game progressed, but the first
impingments at that time were simple shocks.  Its definitely
another type of incident, and probably runs earlier on the track
than either secondaries or engrams. 

#  These shocks are often the key to clearing up Psychic Wounds, 
# especially at beginning levels. That they discharged so easily for you, 
# is a bonus.

I tried to blow the charge on those shocks for decades with little
success.  It wasn't easy.  It was hitting the exact right button
on the heaviest shock that I have had in this lifetime.  Namely,
spotting that it was a destroyed beingness and that the beingness
which was destroyed was "an auditor".

I would suggest that if you hit the exact right button, it will
always discharge miraculously.  The trouble is that I don't
know all the possible buttons (like destroyed beingness), and 
that you might have to L&N for the item (an "auditor" in this case).
I had run so many grades style buttons (PTPs, overts, ARCXs, 
eval, inval, protest, and so on) on this area previously that
the answer was obvious.  Maybe the right approach would be to
cool the area down a bit first with that kind of stuff (ruds etc.) 
before going for the key button that blows the whole thing.

#  If you use a Game Sphere pattern, the connection becomes clearer. 
# The "goals in opposition" approach leaves lost beingnesses which are out of 
# balance. The goals all align to a Game Sphere, in which all the factors 
# of a game are present. One must assume an identity before an actual goal is 
# set.

Here I think that you are making the same mistake that Hubbard was
famous for, namely that there is one basic or one right approach
or one source etc.  He had his cronic 'eureka I've finally got it
and lets throw out all the old tech' (he wouldn't quite say it
this way, but that's what he did pretty much on an annual basis in
the 50s and 60s).

There are problems, overts, and upsets and these are three different 
things. And there are secondaries, engrams, and shocks (in the sense 
of shifts in beliefs or frames of reference) and these are three
more different things.  And then there are GPMs, game spheres, and codes 
and these are yet another three different things.  And I'll bet
that there are quite a few more factors besides these.

One has identities as senior to goals, and also identities derived
from goals.  First there are problems.  Then there are overts (in
an effort to solve problems).  And then there are more problems
caused by the overts.  In a similar manner, there are valence masses
before GPMs, and they eventually lead to mocking up GPMs and then
the GPMs bring about more valences.

As to the goals in opposition approach leaving lost beingnesses
out of balance, I would expect this to be the case if you
concentrated on GPMs exclusively.  But if you ignore GPMs,
you will have the problem of leaving "opposition" type charge
unhandled.  Each is an area that needs to be run.

I would be very interested in seeing your exact layout for
a game sphere pattern.


# There are three types of goal:
#
# True goals which flow naturally from the essence of the being.

Certainly.

# Actual goals which belong to identities and are altered from true 
#  goals by the narrow band an identity must assume.

Yes.  The slightly distorted goals connected with these game spheres.

Next would be implanted games, which would lead to very abberated
goals (New Idea - wow).

So of course I wondered what would be an implanted game.  Instant
answer: making money.   But of course implants mimic actuals,
so there would also be actual games to make money.  Another
new cog: we each had our set of games but they were not necessarily
shared or agreed on, so we all implanted each other to jam our
games down each others throats.


# Implant goals, which are altered even further.

Yes.  Implanted simple goals.  Single (rather than double) firing
patterns (decay scales) like the penalty universes.

#
#	Love,
#		Enid

Then there are actual GPM goals.  With their sick behaviour of
mocking up your own direct oppostion.  Definitely late track.
Only a very decayed being would do this to himself.

And finally there are the implanted GPMs (double firing patterns).

So I get a total of six.  Namely, the simple ones, the game
related ones, and the self opposing ones, each in a natural form
followed by an implanted form.  Of these, only the very first
(simple actual) is unabberated.

Carrying on, I decided to try and see how the 1968 incident might
lead back to an early game sphere.

To begin with, I had the valence of an auditor being trashed by
the valence of a C/S.  But I also had Ron in the picture and paying
public and ethics officers and regs, etc.  Lots of game valences,
all supposedly working together but really tossing each other in
the dumpster.

Obviously, the specific items I described are not general enough,
so I tried to generalize it a bit.  Then I thought of my current
actual GPM which is the goal "to be intelligent".  I could see a
teacher and student getting into this kind of game.

It would make sense for an earlier game sphere to get sucked into
later GPMs.  I could see that this teacher/student game had
come in at an earlier time in the GPM while living the GPM items.

But the game sphere did not derive from the GPM, and the GPM
didn't derive from the game sphere, only a small section latched
onto this particular game sphere (but I had the sense of other
game spheres coming into play in different sections of the GPM
item plot).

So I grabbed my next earlier actual GPM, which is the goal
"to be Holy", and looked to see if this same game sphere had been
operating then.  And I saw that there was a segment where I
was the desciple of a holy man and the same game was played out.

And with that, I began to see the pattern of the game.  Namely,
that the master always holds something back and is more interested
in the practical profits or whatever.  And the student is sold
on the goals and tries to devote himself and finally discovers
that he is betrayed by the master.

And I thought of being an apprentice carpenter, studying with a
master craftsman and persuing some sort of asthetic and constructive
goal about building beautiful spiral staircases.  And I learned
and crafted and believed in the wonderful integrity of the master
because he lectured on such things.  And then we went on a real
constuction job and I wanted to build a perfect staircase,
and he cheated the patron on the materials and substituted cheap
lumber and told me that they'd never know the difference anyway.
And I felt betrayed.  This might have been in what I've been
calling the "conflicts" universe which was just before the Magic
Universe (see the Cosmic History in Super Scio).

And in this last one, it did not seem to me that I was working
a GPM type goal with regular opposition.  And it seemed like
something very basic released.  And suddenly I realized that
I must have been the master first before I decayed into being
the apprentice.

And a pattern was revealed.  First you can do it.  And its not
that important to you, because you can do it.  So you do it to
achieve other things (like making money or whatever), so of course
your ethics end up a bit slimy.  Therefore you lose ability.
So next you try to relearn the skill, and become the apprentice.
Now you're all devoted and idealistic, and get betrayed (by a
master who acts just like you did).  Eventually you are so 
upset that you can't do the thing at all.  So you become a
patron and try to buy it, but you always get screwed by the
unethical master and the incompetant apprentice.  The game
pattern is constant, whether you are building staircases or
auditing PCs.

And there was the sense that this goes back very early and
I don't even have the terms to describe the godlike guru 
and chela that exist in the manifestations of this game
back in the era before home universe.  But again something
has discharged even though my Itsa line is inadequate in the
basic area.

The feeling is that early on there are many of these game
spheres, each accumulating more not-isness and abandonment
of specific manifestations as one keeps re-enacting and
flinching at these games.  They float losely, occasionally
getting dramatized, thoughout the early track.  Then one
starts building real GPMs and these game spheres have
something solid to latch on to.  After that its like a
criss-crossed set of lines.  Each game sphere threads
through many different goals, going into play occasionally
when the GPM items swing close enough to launch the 
specific game.  And each GPM pulls different game
spheres into restimulation in different parts of its item
plot.

A possible cognition (but I'm way over my head and not sure
that its right) is that there was a "games implant" which
attempted to act as a grouper on the game spheres.  And
it layed the foundations for building actual GPMs.  This
would be many universes earlier than the GPM grouping
implants like the CC and OT2 (which depend on earlier
actual GPMs for their force).

Another new thought: There would also be (of course),
codes implants (ethics implants) after the fact of simple
codes and violations.  Initialy these would have been done
to try and get everybody to have the same ethical standards,
and of course it simply confused everybody as to what was
right or wrong because any agreed upon standard will always
have some conflicts with each beings specific codes.

I'm probably restimualting as much as I'm blowing at this
point.  Everything looks strange, thin, unreal, and drifting.

We've been jaming stuff down each others throats for a long
time now.  Implanting our own codes and games and GPMs 
and whatever into each other in an effort to become the
one static (which is a lie since the static is neither 
one nor many nor mearly infinite but rather is all of these
and none simulateously).

There, that stopped the drifiting unreality.  I was simply
protesting the enforcement of the physical universe.  Yet
another thing we jam down each others throats.  I force you
to have my mockups and you force me to have yours and the
end result is that neither of us can mock up anymore but
simply carry on the shared residue of our earlier unique efforts.
This hints at the anatomy of a real grade devoted to eval.
Its heavier than I thought.  The whole physical universe is
a cronic eval imposed by each of us upon the others.

And on this note it seems like the right point to move on
to Richard's pre-Mest ideas.

- --------------

From: VoltR@ctinet.net (Robert Ducharme) - marked by *s

*The Pilot wrote as part of his article:
*
*> Examining the area further, there was absolutely no connection
*> with GPMs.  There was no direct opterm and no goals in opposition.
*> Somebody else might have had different considerations and gotten
*> a similar incident locked up on a GPM, but as far as I was
*> concerned, I had been crushed by my own side rather than by an
*> opponent.
*
* These are found only by further inspection of the shock.  Every step of
* the shock moment handling must be done in order to discharge these.  I have
* been finding instances of multiple opposing goals in each shock moment to
* where I'll check each postulate with the question of "is there a postulate
* that opposes that?"  Sometimes there is, sometimes there isn't.  But there
* is always at least one pair of opposing goals.

Further inspection.  OK.  Still no direct manifestation of a GPM.
Opposing goals?  Not really except in a mundane sense ("to not be
thrown overboard" opposing the goal "to throw somebody overboard").
We could get exotic and full of dub-in and say that Hubbard was
opposing my goal to be free, except that I wasn't thinking that
or mocking it up even unconciously.  I felt that they (CSes, Ron,
etc.) had all gotten confused and enturbulated and lost their way.
I didn't think of them as enemies although I was upset with them
about what was going on.  Later I might have had thoughts of
opposition, but that was after the fury had continued to accumulate
locks and charge.

On a point like this you take the PCs data.  Doesn't matter if
it violates theory, whether the theory is yours, mine, or Ron's.

But wait, you changed the question on me.  Postulates in opposition.
Now thats a different matter entirely.  Most postulates are not
goals (although a goal will be a senior postulate).  You can find
those in the simple act of driving down the street or searching
for a good channel on the radio (you're postulating Mozart and
they're postulating Led Zepplin).

Postulates are the lightest most common thing there is.  And yet
they are also potentially the most powerful and the most basic.

I can find lots of those in the incident.  The heaviest was the
postulate to stop auditing (and of course the DofP and the C/Ses
wanted me to keep auditing and everybody wanted the HGC stats
to go up).  Not a goal, just a simple decision.  And I might
have changed my mind the next day except for all the charge that
was coming from the fury.  And I changed my mind the following
month anyway (but I decided that I wouldn't let anybody be
charged for my auditing - again due to the charge on the fury).

* After the opposition forces are discharged, then the computation holding the
* shock in place by justifying its existence must be ferretted out.  I haven't
* found anybody that could short-circuit these steps. **   RD

Hmm.  A computation holding the shock in place?  Of course.  I had
to hang on to that entire mess so that I could figure out what the
hell happened.  Big mystery.  Much enturbulation.  Must understand
it so that I can keep it from happening again.  So I keep
restimulating it and even forcing similar stuff to happen so that
I can figure it out (later similars with execs, SO missions,
FEBC grads, etc.).


* Last saturday I ran two highly experienced processees each on the item
* they presented me with.  The force in the shock was so intense that they
* both told me that they'd momentarily passed out.  One claimed to have passed
* out several times.  And that person was a NOTS completion, L's completion,
* BC graduate.  I'd say there was a lot of force in them thar shocks.  They
* both literally stated that that was the toughest session they'd ever had.

Not surprising.  My charge evaporated on the destroyed beingness
button.  But it WAS a destroyed beingness.  That is massive
unconciousness, like dying on the theta level.  Hitting the right
button was like grounding a charged up capacitor before touching it.
I had tried to run this at previous times, and without any tech on
shocks etc. it would tend to either knock me anaten or stir up
the fury.

Note that my incident was not an engram (no serious impacts),
not a loss initially (although there was a loss after the fact),
not a GPM (not mocking up my own direct opposition), and not
handleable by ruds type buttons (although out-ruds existed in
the incident).  None the less, it was capable of totally overwhelming
me even after clear, clear OT, cause over life (BTs), and a
keyed out OT state that included direct violations of physical
laws.  And I'd run everything the org has deader than a doornail
on this one.

Definitely not GPM clearing.  Nothing aimed at GPMs would have 
had a chance against this one.  But your shock handling might 
have had a chance.  And Enid's or Alan's stuff might have had
a shot at it as well.  I think that all three of you are getting
people with this stuff in heavy restim because the org totally
bypasses it and simply stirs it up without handling it (and
busily creates the condition as well).

Lets forget about these status buttons.  An OT 6 with grade 1
in restim can get burried under the weight of his problems.
And grade 1 does not errase (at least short of about OT 98)
so it can always key in again.  If he's dumb enought to blame
the problems on BTs and pretend that he isn't responsible for
them, it can just about kill him.  I've seen this in practice.

An unhandled level in heavy restim is serious no matter how many
other levels you have done.


* They both discharged the items completely in the end, by the way, and had a
* full E.P.  I don't know if there are things beyond what I'm addressing (I
* consider them to be GPMs by definition) but I think my processees have a lot
* of stuff to work with until a new plateau is reached, if that indeed does
* happen.  I asked them both if they could see any phenomena above what we
* were handling, and they both replied negative.  **  RD

Very well done on getting them through it.

As to their not seeing other stuff, most people don't when they'er in
the middle of a level.  And even after they finish, they don't
usually until they go out and bump into life again.

There was awhile when I really did think everything came from BTs
and I was successful in tracing everything back to them.  This is
a phase you go through on each level.  When you're working
something intensively, everything does get mixed up with it
even though its not the basic source on most of it.  Then you
finish the level and are senior to it and you look around and
see how much is left.

If you're working somebody on shocks, you would keep working that
way until they reached the point of being senior to shocks.
I can see it although I don't have it myself yet.  You would
get to the point where you had no shock on shifting valences
or changing game contexts.  Willingness to be anything at
will.  To some degree senior to time and sequence of play.
A very high state indeed.  You'd go around super blown out
for a month.  And then you'd get very gutzy and postulate
that you were President of the USA (can assume any beingness
at will, so why not try that one out), and then you'd discover
that you still had PTPs, overts, and ARCXs among other things.


The next part is from a later post of Robert's:

* I had answered this point in a previous post, but I failed to add an
* important datum to the answer.
*
* When a person takes an item back to a pre-MEST area, he will often, as a
* free being, be off by himself playing games solo and getting himself into
* trouble. In these cases, there will be no opposing force from others'
* intentions, but there will still be his own postulates - counter postulates.
* The key here is the shock moment which is also the moment of shift, where
* the person shifts from one identity to another.  The person will at one
* moment be happy and playful, and the next moment will be terrified, or sad
* or something.  Those two identies will be in opposition because he never
* really stopped being the first identity.  He simply has taken on a second
* identity that opposes the first.  And this is actually the basis for all
* inabilities all the way down the track.  The being is ultimately the one who
* is stopping himself.  The identity before says something like "I can" or "I
* disagree" while the identity after says "I can't" or "I agree".  
*
* When the shock moment is taken up in session, the identity before the shock
* and the identity after the shock become the sources of the opposing goals.

Well lets see about this one.  Before the shock, the identity was "an
auditor".  Afterwards it was a confused and miserable being who
didn't know what the hell to do about anything.  

Taking a broader view, the big current GPM (to be intelligent) didn't 
even go through an item shift (if it had I'd probably be dead), I was 
still being a smart-ass (that's not actually my RRing item, but it has the
approximate flavor) but now I was a miserable one instead of a cheerful 
and successful one.  

But examining the game sphere that had gone into operation, the game 
had hit its point of betrayal, so there was a shift from being the wide 
eyed innocent into being the betrayed synic.  Looking earlier, I can
see this same game played out (sort of) in a lifetime back in the
1700s.  The lifetimes in between have different game spheres in 
opperation.  However, they all have a consistancy of this goal to
be intelligent.  Last lifetime it was the game of the starving artist
rather than the betrayed desciple.

* There may be other identies involved in the incident, but his own are the
* most important.  They also contain all the postulates that are worth taking
* up.  In the end the being finds out that he tricked himself into believing
* that he was unable when he was actually perfectly able.  He even justifies
* it like a child not wanting to go to school, convincing his mother and
* consequently himself that he's ill.

Tricked myself into believing that I was unable.  Now that's an odd 
though in this case, hard to believe.  But it sounds correct per
basic theory.  So here were these class 8s, and there was Ron playing
at being Mr. overwhelm, and there I was with no hope in hell of
changing all this.  Maybe I could have operated there without getting
hit myself, and maybe I could have blown and mocked up my own org or
something, but even that would not have remedied the gross outnesses
which were destroying my friends, and that was part of the picture.

But wait, we are mocking up reality, and I had even been keyed out
OT before the incident.  So maybe I could have just waved a hand and
changed everything.  Or maybe just teleported to the ship and thrown
off some big sparks and ordered Ron to behave.  Or maybe even just
snuck over to the telex machine late at night and started sending
messages to Ron that would snap him out of his dramatizations.

So why not?  Just the feeling that it would violate big heavy codes.
There's darkness here I can't penetrate.  Implanted codes, drawing
their force from earlier actual codes.  Mustn't screw around with
reality.  Must not violate the sequential nature of time (I might
know enough now to shift Ron into a saner valence, but I wouldn't
have then).

Ah.  The implanted codes work because violating them restimulates
the real violations of your own codes.  I have no personal code
against violating phsical reality.  I think that it makes more game
and is good for people.  And I'm quite willing for other people to
re-arrange reality to taste.  I like to see that kind of ability.
But the implanted code on not violating physical laws is pretty darn 
tough and I've only managed to slip around it on rare occasions.

Its not my code and yet it must be locked up on something which is
my code.  Maybe something like giving others a chance or playing
fair or something (I might have actual codes like that) and the implant
convinces me that it would be unfair or wouldn't give others a chance 
to play if I messed around with the playing field.  Something like that.  
But this area is still full of blackness.  Might need a hundred hours 
of running codes and violations to really get a clear view.

But I have this strange idea that at basic I'm going to find out
that agreeing with physical reality (an implanted code, at least
for me) will turn out to be a subtile violation of my own real
codes, including the ones that I think I'm keeping by not violating
physical reality.

We each have integrity and self-consistancy within ourselves and
then we implant me into you and you into me and we become
inconsistant and continually violate ourselves by following each
others codes.

We were implanted into believing that our codes were wrong.  There
is more to be learned here.  This is very early track, prior to
GPMs.  At least 3 or 4 universes back, but after the fact of having
our own basic codes (the first actuals are before implants, always).
But probably after home universe, because we were still too much
ourselves at that time to have gotten screwed up in this kind of
manner.

Digressing for a moment, Homer had a question concerning Robert's
post.

*>>    How does a being, who is playing alone, create a shock for himself?
*>> 
*>>    Let us analyze this further, please.
>> 
>>    Homer

Of course you can shock yourself, but it requires forgetting
something so that you can be surprised.  If you mock up a wonderful
palace, and can manage to forget about it, then you can find it later
and delight in this palace that some kind soul left abandoned.  Then
one day you remember mocking it up.  That is a shock.  Especially if
you didn't believe that you were ever powerful enough to mock up
such a thing.

But its debatable as to whether this could be basic rather than after 
the fact of separating from others.

I don't think that these shocks can be basic.  How could you truely shock
a being who was still capable of being anything and could shift
valences/identities at will or maintain multiple ones simultaneously.
Any shocks at this level would be transitory ones for purposes of
self-amusement rather than anything abberative.

Its the same problem as with secondaries and engrams, namely that
the being already has to be abberated to some slight degree before
these can actually impact him.

There can be no true shocks or abberations of game as long as the
being can conciously operate multiple roles and viewpoints
simultaneously because the shocks only happen to the players.
We can still do this at a very low level.  Play a chess game or a
game of monopoly with yourself, taking on different roles for each
player (aggressive, conservative, etc.).  Shocks can happen to the
players you are mocking up.  But they don't happen to you yourself.
And if you give each of these roles a code to follow, you will see
that even the codes give way at this level.

Now make it into a giant monopoly set with a thousand "players".
And have 20 people come over and manage 50 "players" each.  There
are still no shocks or codes for the senior beings even though
there are now multiple senior beings playing.  Its the shutdown
of awareness into a single identity (or multiple singularities
with no senior awareness) that makes the shocks to the "players"
stick.  The senior beings could not have any of the more advanced
abberations (shocks, secondaries, engrams, valences, games, codes,
GPMs, etc.) but they could have out ruds (problems manageing
their pieces, cheating, going out of ARC with other senior beings
etc.).

Now I'd like to take a second digression because I want to leave
Roberts pre-Mest stuff for last.

Since I have been trying out everyone else's theories, I though that 
it would also be appropriate to survey Ron's tech in the area of this 
1968 fury.

Certainly there were various entities restimulated and probably
at least a few at work adding fuel to the fire.  It certainly would
not have been as bad for me if I had already run Nots, and I
did a very intense clean up of any Nots suff connected with this
while doing solo Nots.  But that certainly didn't errase the area
or relieve the real charge.  It simply reduced the PT restimulation
of that charge.

It had little connection with my current actual GPM except to
contribute to the factors chipping away at the current valence
item.  Maybe stirred the service fac around a little ("they're
stupid"), but no big deal.

It restimulated implant GPMs.  In fact it seemed like one big
implant at the time.  Definite charge.  Running implants got
some of the weight off, but again came nowhere near handling
the real fury.  Even so, it would not have been as restimulative
if I had run out lots of implants (both Ron's and my own platens)
before hand.

There was no serious engram at the time.  There is no hint of
an engramic command phrase in operating (as in DMSMH).  Maybe
some faint engramic restim from being thrown in the showers
(oh no, I'm at the mercy of the implanters) but I even though
that a bit laughable at the time (I had gone clear on power but
of course was not an attested clear and had not done the CC.
I didn't find force very restimulative, it was the intentions
which really bothered me).

There was a secondary.  Lots of feelings of loss.  I've scanned
this area a lot, so I wouldn't bother with another pass trying
to run it as a secondary.  Instead, let's try some kind of an
assist for secondaries.

So I use the 1st ACC handling which is to blow up the terminal
(in mockup form) that was lost ("if you blow up the right person,
you can just about crack the case").  My first thought is that
the entire org was lost.  So I start blowing up mockups of the
org.  Suddenly I realize its all the individuals I've lost.
I turn on a heavy grief charge.  It's not the org at all but the
people.  Old friends never seen again, old 2Ds or prospective
2Ds.  Close allies.  Auditors who swore that they were never
going to audit again and left.  PCs and students betrayed, never
to be seen again.  Others shifting valence, becomeing somebody
else, dramatizing and psychotic instead of the friends I once
knew.  Some of them stay on staff and attack other staff members.
Others blow and attack those who remain.  I've actually been
crying slightly and suddenly something shifts and I start
laughing.

Whether they stayed in or left, people had the same pissed off
dramatization.  The hostility that was subsequently aimed
at the org by those who blew is identical to the hostility
aimed by the senior staff at the junior staff and by the junior
staff at the "psychs and squirrels".  It is a consistant something.
A dark energy hunting for a target.  Some people give themselves
over to it and become vehicles for it and others just have
momentary hot flashes and then reassert their own integrity.
But it blankets the subject.  Its the same rage that Ron is
dramatizing.  I'm not doing an A=A here, it just seems like
one vast pool which finds different outlets.

The obvious idea is that its just Ron's rage being copied around.
But I just can't see him as source.  The cloud seems more solid
when I think of it as his mockup.  Even he was not capable of
putting out that much energy at that time.  He was dramatizing
it along with the rest of us.

But I've already run my rage/fury, so how does this fit?  Actuals
before implants.  Self as source before external.  The cloud
was already there in early 68, but it did not fasten on me.
Then came the destroyed beingness and my own reason for rage.
Then the cloud increases the intensity ten fold.  That feels
right.  Running my own rage exteriorized me from it.  Then I
could look at the cloud which was not me and see its contribution.

Another new basic idea.  You can't be source for another being.
But you can contribute to his motion.  That's how you help or
hinder.  External sources amplify or diminish.  You can sooth
the hurt or inflame it.

Then comes the big question.  What was the source for the cloud.
Now I think we're out of the Mest universe and talking about some
senior area.  Again way over my head.  So I'll put it aside
briefly and take another look after poking around at the pre-Mest
stuff.

Conclusion:  Even after all the other handlings, there was still
charge on this incident as a secondary. 

Moving right along, the next area of tech would be the
grades / ruds.  This incident contained out-ruds in vast quantities.  
Running them always brought some relief but did not really clean 
up the area.  Thats funny because I do think that the ruds are basic.

But I've previously said that you can't really undercut all the
way to basic on ruds because the force band is in the way.
So the ruds I always ran on this would have been shallow key outs
rather than basics.  Maybe now I can take a look.

There were endless ARCXs at the time.  But now it seems like a
vacuume.  No charge.  I have this strange idea that that black
cloud was the real charge which was being bypassed and therefor
ARCX tech no longer applies.  Maybe just a wierd idea, so I'll
drop it for now.

There were endless overts, withholds, motivators, and justifiers.
All run ad naseum because I thought it was the most likely target.
But there was a lot of valid charge run before I pushed into
overrun.  However, overrun might occur because true basic is completely
out of the band of accessibility.  So I'll take a fresh look.

There is the feeling of a basic overt.  Letting myself be
overwhelmed.  Letting it happen so as to convince somebody else
that they had comitted an overt.  Goes way way back.  Reality
Wars (see Cosmic History).  I can see it.  Pretending that I
had been destroyed to cave somebody else in.  Reminicent of that
bulletin on how help became betrayal.

Another one.  Handing off responsibility to others.  Letting
them take the blame.  Very early.  Done to make them guilty.
This all feels earlier than any real codes.  Just nasty tricks to
get one up on the competition.

Lots of stuff in the area of problems.  The basic problem of 
getting people to co-operate without losing their individuality.
So people intentionally exchange pieces of themselves (as BTs)
to share themselves with others and bring about a comonality of
agreement and understanding.  Of course that is a solution and
it abberates instead of cures.

Out comm.  Of course.  Some good communication could have blown
the whole thing apart.  Same for everything else in existance
if we felt like it.

Looks like there were all sorts of underlying basics in the area
of ruds.  And none of them ever really surfaced on the ruds type
handlings that were done on the area before running off all the
heavier stuff.

But now I feel like I'm bypassing that pre-Mest area.  So back to
Robert's post.

* By the way, lately I've even been doing well by adding a new step to the
* process.  I have the person "move thru the moment of shock from beginning to
* end by not-being".  This is evidently the 8th dynamic viewpoint where the
* 7th dynamic viewpoint would be the viewpoint of being.  Strange, but it has
* been yielding blowdowns and VGIs.  
*
* I may try adding Alan's procedure of scanning thru the time track back to
* the present.  But then I'm not sure if that would need to be done from
* multiple viewpoints.  (I hate adding more arbitraries to an already workable
* process.)
*
* Robert

Moving through by not-being.  Gives me the idea of running from the
unconcious senior viewpoint that lies above my current personal
manifestation.

This fits with another thought I've had about the pre-Mest business.
It's both before and concurrent.  The super individuals who setup
the monopoly board and then play, but who are asleep and only 
live on in the pieces on the board.

Very early track.  Concious of self as many and senior to the many.
No reason not to think a thousand different things at once or
occupy infinite viewpoints simultaneously.  But there are also
other infinities who are not you, so there is still individuality
in its own strange higher manifestation.  As above, so below.

Trying to spot something now in PT.  Myself as higher source above
this current identity.  Get a very strange visio.  A sort of greenish
aneoba like thing in a sea of bluish grey.  Maybe some absurd dub-in
because the reality is totally out of reach.  

I try an odd experiment.  I imagine that the gap between two of the
pseudo-pods is filled in, sketching a line between the two peaks
and filling it in.  There is no force or charge on this.  Doesn't
feel like I'm doing anything.  But the wierdest thing happens.
As I do it, I instantly have a cognition out of the blue with no direct
connection to anything I've been running and no obvious reason
that led up to it.

The cognition is as follows:  That we are a wellsping of creativity
at the top (I sort of knew this part), and we have become stuck in
a fixed reality (also obvious), therefore we must sleep and dream to 
give all that bottled up creativity some chance to manifest itself
(this is the new awareness).  This gives me the idea that when
we have to sleep, we are being knocked out by our own suppressed
creative forces which demand to be manifest in some manner.

It does seem to me that I can sit up half the night and only sleep
a tiny amount if I'm writing or otherwise creating or designing
something.  A lot of artists have said things like this.  
It's not an absolute, eventually the body drags me down, but
its at least half true.

This seems like a neat way to make gains, so I try to connect
more pseudo-pods.  But the strange higher level reality has
fluttered out of reach.  I'm not really ready for this and have
simply gotten lucky.  I can mockup the vision I saw and play
at connecting things but its just a mockup.  I was not seeing
what was really there, the picture I saw was meaningless.
But I momentarily touched the unpercieved reality behind it,
and did something to expand it, hence the cognition.

Back to the process.  Moving through by not-being.  It seems like
shock is too narrow.  I already had the feeling of something
extending forward from the earlier violation (a few months earlier)
that predisposed me to the shock and the fury.  But Robert might
have a broader definition of shock than I do, and he has also
mentioned earlier beginings, so I'll just take the whole broad
timeperiod from the violation onward.

Feeling of forces moving like a river below me.  But no real
conciousness or awareness.  I have though previously that there
is a higher viewpoint like this but that it has long been unconcious.
Sort of going through a perpetual "engram".

But why so unconcious.  Why is it all so obscure.  My gut feeling
is "hiding".  Been hiding for a long long time.  I see myself as
a multi-part infinite manifestation at the time of the Reality
Wars and I see myself as already knocked out in the higher state
and only concious in the fragments by the time of home universe.

The feeling is of a sleeping giant with threads trailing down
into the universes.  The threads are sequential in their own
time streams.  They are individual "me"s.  But they are not
necessarily sequential or parrallel relative to each other.
And the time of the giant is not the same as the time of the
threads and might also be non-sequential to them.  And their
are other sleeping giants, and all of their threads intertwine.

And maybe a spark lands on the intertwined mass of threads in
their pseudo reality.  A spark that would wake the giants up.
And one of my threads, the one that is writing this, gets caught
up in the conflaguration, and I hope to be awakened as do others.
But the fire fighting gear goes into operation and drops a black
mass onto the spark to put it out.  And the thread is blackened.
But perhaps it is still smoldering here and now.

Of course I'm just drawing an analogy to the feeling I get on
trying to scan through this from a higher viewpoint.  I'm in an
area of massive unreality and dub-in.  But I do think that there
is something there and that in some odd way I have gotten a
feeling of what occured.

So why are we resisting waking up.  There might be old fire
fighting gear, but we would still have to be creating it now,
so that's just a via.  There would still need to be a current
reason.  Maybe its the same reason we went to sleep in the first
place.  Here is certainly more food for thought.  But I think
that a lot more will have to be run to get any reality on this
and make things visible.

When I looked over this again later, it occured to me that the
strange cognition I had about needing to sleep might hold an
answer to how the "higher level beings" were knocked out.
If blocking channels of creativity can kick back and knock a
being out, then blocking out all but 3 dimensional creations
would have one hell of an impact and could be what put us to
sleep at this higher level.  Maybe the reality wars are still
going on and we are simply lying unconcious on the battlefield.

I seem to have dredged up endless data and cognitions and taken
off a ton more charge.

So let me thank you all very much for the inspiration and 
suggestions and encouragement.

The Pilot


========================

This is the trailer that was put on most of the above messages:

See the new "SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" by the Pilot at
http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/pilot.html

Get the Pilot materials (the 32 part SUPER SCIO book) at:
ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/index.html
or pick up the ss## files from Homer's archive at lightlink.com.

Subsequent follow-ups, arguments for reform, defenses, criticisms,
occasional jokes, and even more tech can be found by searching dejanews
http://www.dejanews.com/ either for "Super Scio" or for all
pilot postings to ARS by using the following search string:
    ~a (The Pilot) & ~g (alt.religion.scientology)

My public key is as follows: (really version 2.6ui)

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6

mQCNAjOdP4IAAAEEAMm+dCcv5Tx0KMfaqvvQrhqAlXAuUaMRyLp5VS1CHAE0C0Aq
LR9N884PAfTJ//aDBZKYMAXMxp/pp+Ei/Yq9n5Rh8GAkoFhVt1TjeyKuthTMduOD
cbkAmFGLQiKkvnx/pYtlyUIjqt2cFjh/qBWH2tEbPXW+uZV1xssIt3ZgVQbNAAUR
tCFUaGUgUGlsb3QgPHBpbG90QGhpZGRlbnBsYWNlLmNvbT4=
=q/DH
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----